You could start by being specific: what services should WHAT LEVEL of government provide? Or should I assume you are a true fascist who believes that the nationalist socialist government should provide ALL services and that states, counties, cities and local jurisdictions should do whatever the Führer dictates down to them?

The founding fathers described the states as “laboratories for democracy”: if a state went too far – as states like New York and California very clearly have – then people could prove them wrong by moving to another state and taking their money with them. Today, there is increasingly nowhere to go but to disavow one’s citizenship and flee the country. We cannot flee a totalitarian federal government that has gone WAY too far. Do you agree or disagree that the federal government should be strictly limited in its power?

Here’s a fun question for you: do you believe that Obama should be able to force the Catholic Church to fund abortions? Do you believe that the federal government should have the right to literally force the Catholic Church and other Christian denominations out of the hospital care and care for the poor that they provide by imposing godless federal mandates upon them? Did you know that Christian sects built nearly ALL of the hospitals and schools prior to the 1900s when they turned many of these services over to the government with the promise from the government that it would never do what it is very clearly doing now and banning religion? Do you approve or disapprove of the government using lies to seize control of institutions? Do you approve or disapprove of the federal government being rewarded for lying?

My next question – since you are clearly question-begging and trying to force me into a box – would be to force YOU into a box and ask: is it seriously your contention that every single service your messiah’s all-powerful statist government proves are necessary? Are you here to argue that Obama should be funding studies to study the penis size of gay men?

How about this question: how do you feel about a large liberal Democrat city like Stockton taking out a huge bond to fund union pensions and then going bankrupt? Do you likey?

How do you feel about Obama racking up over $6 trillion in debt in just four years? Is that a good thing? You approve of that, do you? How do you feel about the fact that the size of our actual total debt is now well over $225 TRILLION? Do you believe that was wise and nothing more than the result of the federal government limiting itself to necessary services???

Are you still there, Mike, or does your question seem pretty damn stupid now? Government should be providing a hell of a lot FEWER services than we are and return to the historic tradition of allowing Christians and other religious groups and generous Americans to help people rather than subsidize their broken lives for generation after generation. Nobody starved in this country prior to FDR’s takeover of government.

You seem to think that conservatives are nihilists who want to destroy all government and return to the state of raw animal nature. And you are a dumbass who isn’t worth talking to if that is your view.

you contributed to the dumbing down of America

Anonymous,

You toxic, rabid hypocrite fool.

I simply cannot believe you people. You call me a:

name caller of people he’s nevr met

Hey, buttwipe, what was that you called me just BEFORE you said that? A “sterotype of all rightwing fringe lunatics” wasn’t it? “Rabid” wasn’t it? Then immediately after you call me a buch of names in spite of the fact THAT YOU’VE NEVER MET ME, YOU HYPOCRITE, only then do you demonize me for being a “name caller.” And then right after you say name calling is bad, you immediately proceed to call me more names, such as a “hater” and a “Koolade drinker.”

I keep asking you people this: how does your skull not explode from all the contradictions. Why do you literally do – both before and after – the very thing you demonize me for doing??? Your soul is completely filled with lies.

I contribute to the dumbing down of America, do I? And you’ve made it brilliant again? Other than your personal attacks against me, show me ONE THING in your “comment” that was a fact. What did you document to prove what I was arguing was wrong? What argument did you provide? Just ONE damn thing. The ONLY thing you offer is name-calling and hate; and you’ve got the balls to tell me that my being a “name caller of people I’ve never met” and that “I’m contributing to the dumbing down of America ” as the reason why your messiah is such a complete failure????

You think you’ve been unfortunate to have met rightwingers, do you? The EARTH itself says its unfortunate to have known YOU.

You tell me that “the GOP continues to shrink in numbers.” You stupid dumbass, you were saying that in 2010 too just before the GOP kicked your ass up one side and down the other in the most historic sweep in over seventy freaking years. Not that factual reality matters to you or anything.

Nobody who has so much as a single shred of self-respect would do what you just did, you documented hypocrite without shame.

And we are now at thirteen consecutive liberals who have now pretty much proven that liberals are categorically too stupid and too evil to respond to a single fact or argument.

The idiocy of the left is an amazing thing, when you think about it.

Obama was talking about roads and bridges, not the business itself

Anonymous dumbass,

Too bad you can’t comprehend the English language. And too bad the only “ground” you’ve got to stand on is your talking point ideologue outrage

Obama’s words examined:

“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet. The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together.”

The Team then explains: “The President’s full remarks show that the ‘that’ in ‘you didn’t build that’ clearly refers to roads and bridges–public infrastructure we count on the government to build and maintain.”

That’s bunk, and not only because “business” is more proximate to the pronoun “that” and therefore its more likely antecedent. The Truth Team’s interpretation is ungrammatical. “Roads and bridges” is plural; “that” is singular. If the Team is right about Obama’s meaning, he should have said, “You didn’t build those.”

Barack Obama is supposed to be the World’s Greatest Orator, the smartest man in the world. Yet his campaign asks us to believe he is not even competent to construct a sentence.

Hence, you abject dumbass:

“If you’ve got a business (singular), you didn’t build THAT (singular).”

Which of course is what Obama very clearly said. Because yes, you turd, he WAS referring to business.

Whereas if Obama had intended to refer to roads and bridges and ignore the general antecedent rule with pronouns he would have said:

“Somebody invested in roads and bridges (plural). If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build THOSE. Somebody else made THOSE happen.”

Which he didn’t say. Because he’s a communist among other reasons.

I understand, anonymous dumbass. You’re just a cockroach. How can you know stuff that only English-speaking humans should know? You’ve got to worry about those humans swatting you all the time, you can’t figure out the intracies of our language.

I also keep pointing out – and this is now what the TWELTH DAMN TIME YOU LIBERALS HAVE FAILED TO INTERACT WITH WHAT I HAVE NOW REPEATEDLY SAID? – That mass murdering psyco James Holmes USED OBAMA’S ROADS to drive to the theater and murder people.

I have pointed out that James Holmes went to a public school with public school teachers. I have pointed out that James Holmes used public roads. I have pointed out that James Holmes got a government grant. I have pointed out that James Holmes used the Internet. I have pointed out that James Holmes used his government grant to buy his arsenal on the Internet.

So if the government is responsible for Jack Gilcrhrist’s success, you lying demon possessed roach, then the government is responsible for James Holmes and virtually every criminal and every crime in America.

What you are doing is pure evil to credit government with the success of individual hard-working business owners.

And here we are: ten for ten. That’s a milestone of real pathetic gutless cowardice, lefties.

Not one of you has bothered to so much as try to deal with the argument I presented in this article and have repeated over and over to the first eight roaches.

I document it HERE.

YOU LIBERALS are responsible for mass murdering psychos, for rapists, for child molestors, for gang bangers, for drug dealers, for every form of vermin. Because YOU’RE vermin.

Jack Gilchrist received government loands, so government should be given credit for his successs. That’s what you mindless drones have told me over and over.

James Holmes, mass murderer, received government GRANTS, so government chould be given credit for his murder spree and for every murderer who ever got so much as one penny from the government.

James Holmes also drove to the theater to murder people on PUBLIC ROADS. James Holmes used Obama’s INTERNET to purchase his arsenal. The government is responsible for the “success” of every predator on society who uses public roads, because after all, Obama claimed that government is responsible for every good thing that happened on roads and bridges.

Oh, and btw, James Holmes used his government grant money to PAY for his arsenal. So there is little question from your own reasoning that Obama is a murderer.

So, you idiot demon possessed cockroaches want to claim that you’re responsible for Jack Gilchrist? Fine. But you are murderers and rapists and pedophiles by the same damn reason.

Liberals are now nine for nine in documenting that they are stupid people who simply aren’t decent enough or smart enough to get off their damn talking point and actually interact with FACTS.