Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up Scandal Far, FAR Worse Than Nixon’s Watergate Cover-Up EVER Was.

First of all, do you know what the Watergate cover-up was about?

You probably don’t.

Most people – misinformed as they are by a mainstream media propaganda operation that is second only to the Nazi’s Ministry of Propaganda – believe that Nixon’s infamous “Plumbers” Unit was sent into the Watergate Hotel to look for information that would help his re-election campaign.  That is simply false.

So what were Nixon’s “Plumbers” looking for?

 
President Nixon authorizes the creation of a “special investigations unit,” later nicknamed the “Plumbers,” to root out and seal media leaks. The first target is Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers to the press (see June 13, 1971); the team will burglarize the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist, Dr. Lewis Fielding, in hopes of securing information that the White House can use to smear Ellsberg’s character and undermine his credibility (see September 9, 1971). Nixon aide John Ehrlichman, who supervises the “Plumbers,” will later say that the Ellsberg burglary is “the seminal Watergate episode.” Author Barry Werth will later write, “[L]ike all original sins, it held the complete DNA of subsequent misdeeds.” During the upcoming court battle over the documents, Nixon tells his aide Charles Colson: “We’ve got a countergovernment here and we’ve got to fight it. I don’t give a damn how it’s done. Do whatever has to be done to stop those leaks.… I don’t want to be told why it can’t be done.” Whatever damaging information the “Plumbers” can find on Ellsberg will be itself leaked to the press, Nixon says. “Don’t worry about his trial [referring to Ellsberg’s arrest on conspiracy and espionage charges (see June 28, 1971) ]. Just get everything out. Try him in the press… leak it out.” [Werth, 2006, pp. 84-87]

The Plumbers were looking for dirt to smear Daniel Ellsberg, who had leaked the Pentagon Papers.

Here’s the thing: what did the Pentagon Papers reveal?  Who – or perhaps it is more appropriate to ask, which administration – did the Pentagon Papers indict?  The boldfaced type provides the answer:

Daniel Ellsberg is a former U.S. Marine and military analyst who precipitated a constitutional crisis in 1971 when he released the “Pentagon Papers.” The papers comprised the U.S. military’s account of theater activities during the Vietnam War. Ellsberg released top secret documents to The New York Times. His release of the Pentagon Papers succeeded in substantially eroding public support for the Vietnam War. A succession of related events, including Watergate, eventually led to President Richard M. Nixon’s resignation.

The Pentagon Papers were mostly an indictment of the Democratic administration of Lyndon B. Johnson, but they fed the Nixon administration’s preoccupation with finding information and document leakers. They eventually led to the secret White House “Plumbers” group and then to Watergate. In its turn, Watergate led to the first resignation of an American president, Richard M. Nixon. The Pentagon Papers contained plans to invade Vietnam, even though President Johnson had told the public that he had no intention to stage an invasion.

The simple fact of history – despite all the lies that the liberal ideologues have told masquerading as “journalists” – is that Richard Nixon was watching a liberal media campaign based on anonymous leaks erode and undermine U.S. foreign policy that had been approved by successive DEMOCRAT administrations (i.e., both the Kennedy and the Johnson administrations).  Barack Obama notwithstanding, American presidents have the duty to GOVERN and LEAD based on actual REALITY.  Both Republican and DEMOCRAT presidents who had sat in the Oval Office had made the tough calls based on the best intelligence ANY American will ever have access to.  And Nixon was watching the mainstream media communist fascists undermine that policy with a campaign of illegal leaks to selectively embarrass and ultimately undermine and cause the military defeat of the United States of America.

The Pentagon Papers documented that the DEMOCRAT LBJ administration had done some despicable things in their conduct of carrying out the Vietnam War.  They did NOT indict the Nixon administration:

The Pentagon Papers, officially titled United States – Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967: A Study Prepared by the Department of Defense, is a United States Department of Defense history of the United States‘ political-military involvement in Vietnam from 1945 to 1967. The papers were first brought to the attention of the public on the front page of The New York Times in 1971

The Nixon presidency did not begin until 1969.

It’s amazing how history damns Democrats again and again and again.  The Civil War was waged against the United States by DEMOCRATS.  The Klu Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the DEMOCRAT Party.  Prior to the Vietnam War – which had “DEMOCRAT” written all over it – Harry Truman’s incompetence and stupidity literally caused the Korean War in which nearly 60,000 Americans miserably perished.  History reveals that Harry Truman first refused to give weapons to the South Korean government, which emboldened the communist North which was armed to the teeth with the most sophisticated Soviet and Chinese weaponry:

Both Rhee and Kim Il Sung wanted to unite the Korean peninsula under their respective governments, but the United States refused to give South Korea any heavy weapons in order to ensure that its military could only be used for preserving internal order and self-defense. By contrast, Pyongyang was well-equipped with Soviet aircraft and tanks.

History reveals that Harry Truman then proceeded to massively screw up by failing to list South Korea in their zone of protection which gave North Korea, the USSR and China the green light to attack the South:

But just because he did not include South Korea as part of his “defensive perimeter,” it was said later on that such omission had served to give the communists “the green light” to try to overrun Korea.

Emboldened by the exclusion of South Korea from the American defense line in the Pacific zone in the so-called Acheson Declaration, Kim Il-sung decided to launch an outright invasion of the South

Just as history also reveals that Harry Truman – in a pattern that has characterized Democrat administrations for decade after decade – disarmed and weakened America so that we were in no shape to fight anybody anywhere which further emboldened our enemies.

All that the Democrat fiasco in Vietnam was was a longstanding continuation of Democrat fiascos that ultimately included Bill Clinton disarming America and inviting the 9/11 attacks before Bush prior to Obama baring America’s throat to terrorist attacks after Bush.

As much as you want to dump your hate on Richard Nixon, his crime was that he was trying to protect a Democrat administration in order to protect American foreign policy.  And he was trying to expose a dishonest and corrupt media propaganda operation.  And he himself used corrupt and dishonest tactics to accomplish those goals.  And he got busted.  By the very liberal communist fascist rat bastard pseudo-”journalists” who were selectively illegally leaking classified government documents in order to bring about America’s defeat in the Vietnam War.

We now know that Barack Obama is the kind of Chicago thug who criminally used the IRS to target his political opponents.  The word “Nixonian” doesn’t begin to do Obama’s thug tactics justice.  You have to call it “Obamian.”  And if the crap that Obama is pulling doesn’t qualify as “enemies list” garbage, then NOTHING does.

We also know that Obama has his lapdog Kathleen Sabelius ILLEGALLY shaking down businesses to coerce them to give money for ObamaCare (see also here).  It is specifically illegal for someone in such an official capacity to strongarm businesses that you are regulating and asking them for money.  Democrats were besides themselves with frothing rage when Reagan did something like this to get around specific Congressional refusal to fund a program during Iran-Contra.  And they passed a law to criminalize it.  Just as they passed laws criminalizing the Watergate crap that Obama just pulled.  Again, this is Obamaian – because it goes beyond “Nixonian.”

This thug Obama is a demon-possessed criminal who has contaminated the White House beyond repair.  He is the epitome of what his cockroach pastor for 23 years railed when he said, “No, no, no!  NOT God bless America.  God DAMN America!”

But let’s get back to Benghazi.  We now know that the Obama administration engaged in a cover-up.  We know that they tried to cover-up their abysmal, incompetent failure before the 9/11 (2012) attack against the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.  We know that they tried to cover-up their abysmal, cowardly failure during the attack to bring any U.S. assets to bear to help the Americans – including the first U.S. Ambassador to be killed in the line of duty since the failed Carter years – who ultimately perished during the attack.  And we most certainly know that they tried to cover-up the crystal-clear connection to terrorists and al Qaeda.

Obama claims that he called the Benghazi attack an “act of terror” the next day.  Bullcrap.

Obama supporters (read, “dishonest lying weasels”) claim that Obama called the Benghazi attack an “act of terror” the day after the attack. Right. And I called Obama an honest man and a good leader. Obama had just referred to the 9/11/2001 attacks – which even Obama would call “acts of terror” – immediately prior to his statement that “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation.” There is absolutely NO reason – grammatical or logical – to believe that Obama was referring to the attack against the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi with that reference. And Obama went on to PROVE that he wasn’t referring to the Benghazi attack as an “act of terror” by going out and repeatedly claiming that it was NOT an act of terror, but a mob protest gone bad over a Youtube video. Which it was NOT.

Here’s the thing: the very same NIGHT that Obama gave that speech above – at an event memorializing the 9/11/2001 attacks – he gave an interview to 60 minutes.  Let’s look at a snippet from that interview:

KROFT: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word terrorism in connection with the Libya Attack, do you believe that this was a terrorism attack?

OBAMA: Well it’s too early to tell exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other.

KROFT: It’s been described as a mob action, but there are reports that they were very heavily armed with grenades, that doesn’t sound like your normal demonstration.

OBAMA: As I said, we’re still investigating exactly what happened, I don’t want to jump the gun on this. But your right that this is not a situation that was exactly the same as what happened in Egypt. And my suspicion is there are folks involved in this. Who were looking to target Americans from the start. So we’re gonna make sure that our first priority is to get our folks out safe, make sure our embassies are secured around the world and then we are going to go after those folks who carried this out.

So CBS stated as a FACT that Obama “went out of his way to avoid the use of the word terrorism” and Obama clearly continued to avoid using the word “terrorism.”  And if “it was still too early to tell” if it was an act of terror” the night AFTER he gave the speech in which he now claims that he claimed that it WAS an act of terror, well, you see the pretzel Obama twisted the truth in.  Which pretty much proves that when Obama later said he DID call it “terrorism” was a lie.  A lie from a serial liar.  And what we have had was a cover-up by the Obama administration from the very start. 

And why did Obama attempt this cover-up?  Was it for the sake of the previous Republican administration the way Nixon tried to protect the previous Democrat administration?  Nope.  Obama has demonstrated that he is a vicious partisan ideologue who would NEVER lift a finger to ever do anything but demonize and slander the Bush administration.  Was it to protect U.S. foreign policy?  Nope.  Obama was two months from an election and the only thing he was trying to protect was his own scrawny political neck.

Republicans pointed out the TRUTH from the outset. They said the very DAY that Susan Rice went out on all five major Sunday morning political programs and repeatedly lied to the American people that “Most people don’t bring rocket-propelled grenades and heavy weapons to a demonstration.”  Which was obvious to anyone who wasn’t a demon-possessed Obama ideologue.

But as a whole, we know that the Chicago thug Obama administration and the mainstream media thug propaganda were on the same damn page.

The funny thing is that the Chicago thug Obama administration, the Democrat Party propaganda machine and the mainstream media cockroaches are all frantically claiming that there’s nothing to see in any Benghazi investigation because the Republicans are trying to politicize it.  Here’s the thing: these Democrat roaches have just been caught RED-HANDED “politicizing” Benghazi from the very first moments:

WASHINGTON — Political considerations influenced the talking points that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used five days after the deadly Sept. 11 assault in Benghazi, Libya, with State Department and other senior administration officials asking that references to terror groups and prior warnings be deleted, according to department emails.

The latest disclosures Friday raised new questions about whether the Obama administration tried to play down any terrorist factor in the attack on a diplomatic compound just weeks before the November presidential election. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed when insurgents struck the U.S. mission in two nighttime attacks.

The White House has insisted that it made only a “stylistic” change to the intelligence agency talking points from which Rice suggested on five Sunday talk shows that demonstrations over an anti-Islamic video devolved into the Benghazi attack.

Numerous agencies had engaged in an email discussion about the talking points that would be provided to members of Congress and to Rice for their public comments. In one email, then-State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland worried about the effect of openly discussing earlier warnings about the dangers of Islamic extremists in Benghazi.

Nuland’s email said such revelations “could be abused by members of Congress to beat the State Department for not paying attention to (central intelligence) agency warnings,” according to a congressional official who reviewed the 100 pages of emails.

Which is to say that the Obama State Department falsified the truth and engaged in the very FIRST act of “politicizing.”  They literally admit here to altering the facts so their opponents won’t be able to point out that they were incompetent fools.  Which the facts now prove that they very clearly were.

Obama had a completely bogus narrative that, because he had been the president when we got Osama bin Laden, that somehow he had decimated al Qaeda and the War on Terror was over.  Obama stated that as a fact again and again and again prior to the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi planned and carried out to correspond with the anniversary of the 9/11 attack against America in 2001.

The official liar of the Obama Administration, Press Secretary Jay Carney, had told the American people this:

The White House and the State Department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of those two, of these two institutions were changing the word ‘consulate’ to ‘diplomatic facility,’ because ‘consulate’ was inaccurate,” Mr. Carney said on Nov. 28.

We now know that like everything ELSE the most dishonest administration in American history has claimed, that this was a pure lie.  We now know that the talking points went through a DOZEN revisions in order to falsely scrub any connection to al Qaeda or terrorism in order to “support” the Obama lie that the attack was a protest over a video gone bad.  We now know that CIA director (and war hero) David Petraeus was “frustrated” and “surprised” by Obama’s whitewash and distortion of the Benghazi talking points.  Just as the number two man in Libya who clearly KNEW what had actually happened said “my jaw hit the floor” when he heard Susan Rice repeatedly report the Obama lie again and again and again and again and again five days after the attack.

We now know that – contrary to the Barack Obama White House and the Hillary Clinton State Department official lies – that the intelligence IMMEDIATELY claimed that the Benghazi attack was a planned, coordinated terrorist attack by an al Qaeda-linked terrorist group.  And we now know that Obama and Clinton deliberately falsified the intelligence and lied to the American people to cover their own incompetence and their own political aspirations.

Obama lied, Americans died.  Clinton lied, Americans died.  Unlike anything that happened during Watergate. Pat Smith, whose son Sean was murdered, is furious because Hillary Clinton looked her right in the eye and lied to her.  She now says, “She has her child.  I don’t have mine because of her.”  Americans died for Obama’s and Clinton’s sins.

But let’s forget all about Pat Smith’s pain.  After all, as Jay Carney claimed, “It happened a long time ago” (after eight months of delay and cover-ups).  And of course Hillary Clinton exlaimed, “What difference at this point does it make?” 

Susan Rice and Jay Carney need to go to prison – along with these IRS thugs - for their official lies and participation in an obvious cover-up.  Barack Obama needs to be impeached for his high crimes.  And Hillary Clinton needs to never show her face in public again.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

18 Responses to “Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up Scandal Far, FAR Worse Than Nixon’s Watergate Cover-Up EVER Was.”

  1. yammolloy Says:

    Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 12:01:42 +0000 To: bmolloy124@hotmail.com

  2. yammolloy Says:

    Hi Me… Want to send this to me. Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 12:01:42 +0000 To: bmolloy124@hotmail.com

  3. Dog Walker Says:

    I never realized that about Watergate, the leak, the plumbers. Dang! Here I am schooled again.

    Thanks for the detail.

  4. Democrat Says:

    Yes, but we really don’t care about a handful of dead guys in Libya.
    Besides it is all Bush’s fault.
    And all that really matters is that our society becomes more accepting of homosexuality… and that all homosexuals can have government jobs. Oh, not jobs in Libya of course.

  5. Democrat Says:

    Oh, strike that remark about being Bush’s fault. What I really meant to say was that way more diplomats were killed during the Bush years. So, only four, that isn’t so bad compared to Bush.

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    Democrat,

    That is a positively stupid argument.

    That is tantamount to arguing that Abraham Lincoln and FDR were by far and away the worst presidents in American history. Why? Because they led more American soldiers to their deaths than all the other presidents combined.

    Are you truly that stupid, Democrat? (The fact that you ARE a Democrat implies that you are, of course). You are THAT incapable of examining the context of how our diplomats died and under what conditions???

    Apparently so.

    The four Americans murdered in Benghazi, we now know as a FACT, amount to blood on Obama’s hands. The murdered ambassador PLEADED for the security that Obama and Hillary Clinton denied him. They literally left him hanging until the terrorists came to collect the sacrifical offering that Obama and Clinton provided them. We now know that just as Obama and Hillary Clinton abrogated their duty BEFORE the attack, they were cowards DURING the attack. Obama refused to allow ANYBODY to help those Americans while they were fighting for hour after hour for their lives. And we now know that Obama and Hillary Clinton entered into a true cover-up by whitewashing any reference to “terrorism” while claiming over and over again that the attacks were nothing but a demonstration over some stupid video gone bad.

    Show me where Bush let ANY of the diplomats killed under his watch down like that. Show me where these diplomats were on the record pleading for security the way Ambassador Stevens pleaded for security. Show me where Bush actually REMOVED the inadequate security that they had. Show me Bush refusing to help diplomats under fire. Show me Bush entering into a cover-up and lying about how Americans were killed to cover his own ass. Show me. Or get the hell lost, you pathololgically dishonest turd.

    And I’m glad that you stated what is becoming obvious: that being a “Democrat” and being a militant advocate of homosexuality are the same thing.

    All Democrats will one day burn in hell. Except the ones in Libya, of course.

    My God, you people are truly loathsome.

  7. Michael Eden Says:

    Besides it is all Bush’s fault

    Democrat,

    No, I’m NOT going to “strike that remark.” It proves who you are: a knee-jerk ideologue incapable of all thought and all reason.

    All you can do is find somebody else to demonize because you WILL NOT EVER be accountable for the consequences of your reckless and immoral policies.

  8. Michael Eden Says:

    Dog Walker,

    It really is amazing. I had always been told that Nixon had the plumbers break in to the Watergate looking for material to help his re-election. Who told me that? Liberal ideologue public school teachers, of course.

    I didn’t know that the lie I’d always heard wasn’t true until I actually heard Daniel Ellsberg explain in an interview (that I saw watching the Military History Channel) that in fact they were trying to identify the source of leaks of government secrets. Nixon knew by that point that the Democrat Party had become the official party of treason by that point – and that the Democrat Party was coordinating the leaks to undermine America’s effort in the Vietnam War.

    It is beyond amazing, but the Democrat Party had literally “fundamentally transformed” into Jane Fonda. They had literally become the party that wanted to help the communists in Vietnam defeat America.

    And what is even MORE beyond amazing is that the Democrat Party has actually become even MORE depraved since then.

  9. Dog Walker Says:

    Look what happens when a homo/Democrat gets a security clearance.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Manning

    I think this guy’s trial is supposed to start pretty soon.

  10. Pete Says:

    This is one of them trick questions, right?! . . . I mean, What’dya think? . . . . As Far As I’m Concerned The Republicans Could Go Extinct And I Wouldn’t Even MISS THEM! Know what I mean? . . .They’re just totally worthless as human beings, dudes . . . .

  11. FMC Says:

    I was wondering how long we would have to wait before the tyranny and corruption of the Obama regime would be brought to light or if it ever would be. It seemed that Obama’s left-wing media protection would always allow him to operate full blown Chicago-thug-style with total immunity. Amazingly, the regime’s evil deeds are being revealed to the masses, whether they want to accept the truth about this miscreant or not. Only the most delusional liberal drones can deny the truth, now. Even the most far-left cesspool media is reluctantly forced to cover the unfolding saga. The truth is speaking too loud and seemingly impossible to spin away, even though sycophant efforts are still trying. Maybe some residual rays of light will even somehow reach the low-information voter, but that is the realm of miracles.

    The only question now is whether any of this will truly stick and what will the consequences be? Will Obama be able to throw some underlings like the ugly biyatch Hillary under the bus and slip away unscathed or will he be able to convince the dumb populace that this is just a vicious and ruthless attack from the far right? For me, the least of any punishment should be impeachment, but what this scum bag really deserves is a one-way trip to Club Gitmo, where he can spend the rest of his natural life with his terrorist Muslim brothers bowing to Mecca.

    It still utterly amazes me how 50 some million idiots voted for this turd and, even more so, how people cannot see his true intent behind the thick, nasty layers of lies. Like someone once stated, it takes an immoral and depraved mind to believe such lies.

    Everyday I wake up, I can’t wait to see what is unfolding next. My greatest fear is that, even though this clown is be exposed, nothing will happen and the evil democrats will be able to just bury the truth in a stinking pile of lies and spin, and then business as usual God, please let this evil tyrant and his minions get the punishment they so richly deserve.

  12. difference30360 Says:

    Kudos to the three Heroes (Gregory Hicks, Mark Thompson, and Eric Nordstrom), unfairly called whistle-blowers), WHO SAID IT AS IT WAS, not as the Dem’s want to make it look like. Especially KUDOS to Hicks, who happens to be a democrat and voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012….He put country above Obama and party . . .
    You will remain in History as three brave men. Thank you for your courage and sacrifice.
    I hope the American people will do their part to continue what you’ve started.

  13. Michael Eden Says:

    Dog Walker,

    I remember back in the day when I had the same profound sense of moral annoyance at the monsters who prey on us assuring us that they’re the “tolerant people” and they mean culture no harm…

    http://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2010/12/20/gay-military-something-america-needs-like-a-massive-wikileak/

  14. Michael Eden Says:

    As Far As I’m Concerned The Republicans Could Go Extinct And I Wouldn’t Even MISS THEM!

    Pete,

    I can understand why that is true in your case: Republicans are people of ideas and moral awareness and you possess neither and frankly can’t even begin to understand either.

    I presented a rational argument supported firmly by facts. You come here without NOTHING but ignorance and a resultingly ignorant opinion.

    Get lost. I don’t waste time on worthless, mindless thinkers.

  15. Michael Eden Says:

    Only the most delusional liberal drones can deny the truth, now.

    FMC,

    I watched Juan Williams benightedly deny and try to assert over and over again that Obama clearly couldn’t have even theoretically have done anything wrong or even anything incompetently.

    The rest of the panel presented one devastating fact or devastating argument after another and Williams mind simply just wasn’t able to “go there” because of the blinders of his ideology. If he considered these facts, he would be forced to admit that Obama was a turd and Juan Williams had been an ignorant useful idiot for his entire life. And thus so much the worse for the facts. He didn’t respond to them; he pretended he hadn’t heard them or understood them again and again.

    Here’s the problem: I just heard that amazing numbers of American girls have the hots for that terrorist who put a bomb near innocent people and little children knowing it would kill or maim them.

    http://now.msn.com/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-is-too-handsome-to-be-guilty-of-the-boston-bombings-teen-girls-say

    And these are the people who most support Obama.

    When you have a nation of moral idiots, the truth simply is irrelevant.

  16. Beeker D. Says:

    “AMORAL” better word choice. “AMORAL” lack of ANY morals or recognition or concept of MORALITY. Like Liberals or Progressives
    WHAT EVER THEY `FEEL LIKE TODAY` IS THEIR IDEA/CONCEPT OF MORALITY!
    What ever sends a ‘TINGLE’ up their leg or through their groin for that day equals a, `LIBERALS MORALS`!
    56 Million human beings put to death but they’re more concerned and consumed about some ‘CHIPPIE’ getting FREE BIRTH CONTROL, either via the Pill or Having the Living Fetus TORN APART piece by piece!
    **MORALITY** They, LIBIDIOTS and RETROGRESSIVES simply lack the Faculty To Grasp That Concept!

  17. Anonymous Says:

    You are deeply disturbed… You have every right to spew this as fact but you’re deeply disturbed…

  18. Michael Eden Says:

    Anonymous,

    Maybe the fact that what I’m saying IS fact – as you yourself document by being unable to find so much as a SINGLE THING that isn’t true in this piece.

    You people who don’t bother to argue your case because you don’t have ANY facts on your side, such that all you can do is offer nothing but personal attacks and insults, make me sick.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 493 other followers

%d bloggers like this: