Sarah Palin And Mitt Romney Completely RIGHT On Ukraine And Russia VS Barack Obama Who’s Just A Complete FOOL

Remember what a bimbo the mainstream media made Sarah Palin out to be (remember, it’s OKAY to trivialize a woman as long as it’s liberals doing it to a conservative).

But in 2008, Sarah Palin predicted something in which she turned out to be right and every liberal on earth turned out to be a morally idiotic jackass.

She predicted that if coward and fool Barack Obama were elected president, it would embolden Russia into invading Ukraine given the kind of idiocy and naïve weakness he displayed when Putin invaded Georgia:

“After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama’s reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia’s Putin to invade Ukraine next.”

Of course, the mainstream media savaged her for that.  What else is their mission if not a fools’ mission???

For the record, Russia seized two Georgian provinces.  And Obama allowed it.  And Putin has never given them back.  And now he’s going to help himself to what he wants out of the Ukraine – just as Sarah Palin warned would happen if Obama were elected president.

History records that Sarah Palin was wise and Barack Obama is an incompetent boob and a disgrace to the office of President of the United States.

Of course, four years later Mitt Romney demonstrated he had a shred of common sense.  Barack Obama demonstrated that as Pharaoh god king there is NOTHING whatsoever “common” about him, most especially “common sense.”

In their third presidential debate, President Obama ridiculed Mitt Romney when he said that Russia remained a threat to the United States. Here’s what Obama said in the debate:

PRESIDENT OBAMA: “Governor Romney, I’m glad that you recognize that al-Qaida’s a threat because a few months ago when you were asked, what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia — not al-Qaida, you said Russia. And the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.

“But, Governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s. You say that you’re not interested in duplicating what happened in Iraq, but just a few weeks ago you said you think we should have more troops in Iraq right now.“And the — the challenge we have — I know you haven’t been in a position to actually execute foreign policy, but every time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong.”

Here’s how Mitt Romney responded. Notice how Obama tries to cut Romney off before he can make his point:

MR. ROMNEY: I’ll respond to a couple of the things you mentioned. First of all, Russia, I indicated, is a geopolitical foe, not —

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Number one —

MR. ROMNEY: Excuse me. It’s a geopolitical foe. And I said in the same . . . paragraph, and Iran is the greatest national security threat we face. Russia does continue to battle us in the U.N. time and time again. I have clear eyes on this. I’m not going to wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to Russia or Mr. Putin, and I’m certainly not going to say to him, I’ll give you more flexibility after the election. After the election he’ll get more backbone.

In an interview, Wolf Blitzer had asked Romney if he thought Russia is a bigger foe than Iran, China, or North Korea. Here was Romney’s response:

“I’m saying in terms of a geopolitical opponent, the nation that lines up with the world’s worst actors. Of course the greatest threat that the world faces is a nuclear Iran, and a nuclear North Korea is already troubling enough. But when these terrible actors pursue their course in the world — and we go to the United Nations looking for ways to stop them — who is it that always stands up with the world’s worst actors? It’s always Russia, typically with China alongside. And so in terms of a geopolitical foe, a nation that’s on the Security Council that has the heft of the Security Council, and is of course is a massive nuclear power, Russia is the geopolitical foe.”

It seems that Romney was ahead of the game when it came to understanding how Russia is still a major political player to be reckoned with while Obama was is in the dark. Will the media notice? Don’t count on it

Read more at http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/09/romney-right-russia-obama-wrong/#8IeCoUCxoq3tjVfr.99

You need to understand that Barack Obama was operating under the worldview of a complete fool and moral idiot.  On Obama’s view the problem was George W. Bush who was poisoning American foreign policy, NOT Russia or Vladimir Putin.  Obama actually believed that with Bush out of the picture and a “reset” with Russia, that Russia would actually “reset” its entire foreign policy as Obama cowed Putin with his divine magnificence.

And Vladimir Putin has treated Barack Obama like his own personal roll of toilet paper and wiped his butt with Obama at every single turn.

And of course, again, the mainstream media, being demon-possessed jackasses, mocked Romney with their “Hey, Mitt. The 1980s called and they want their foreign policy back!”

Where are we at now (because America was stupid enough to elect and actually RE-elect a complete failure)???

Russia just invaded Ukraine, just as Sarah Palin correctly predicted they would.  Because she knew that Obama’s weakness as a human being would be like catnip to Putin.  And Ukraine is begging America for help.

Fat chance of that happening.  They’re in this fix BECAUSE of America, or at least because of the naïve moral idiot America elected as president.

Barack Obama is exactly like Neville Chamberlain, as I corrected stated years ago (and see here).  Neville Chamberlain, like Obama, was absolutely RUTHLESS in domestic policy.  Neither man cared one damn about his nation, and they knew that they could use a socialist media and exploit the other side’s unwillingness to call their bluff as they took the nation to the brink of collapse to impose their socialist agendas.  But when it came to foreign policy, both men turned out to be complete weaklings and cowards and naïve fools.  And the reason they were so weak in foreign policy was precisely the same reason they could be so strong in domestic policy: because the same media that they could exploit so ruthlessly at home was useless to them internationally.  The Russian media couldn’t care less what the pathetic American media thinks.  The American propaganda mill can’t cow Putin the way it can cow Republicans.  Similarly, Republicans care enough about America to back down from Obama when Obama plays chicken with the nation.  For example, why did Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts blink and call what was clearly not a tax a “tax” in order to rewrite ObamaCare enough to “make” it constitutional?  Because Obama basically said he would demonize the Supreme Court and try to delegitimize it the same way we have now seen him delegitimize Congress – as I pointed back in June of 2012.  That’s why Republicans had to cave in on the debt ceiling to a man who had demonized George Bush for raising the debt ceiling and voted AGAINST raising the debt ceiling as a Senator who then played the part of “Hypocrite-in-Chief” by demonizing the Republicans for taking the EXACT SAME POSITION that he had taken when Bush was president.

Obama is like the absolutely craven coward who would grab his own mother hostage and hold a gun to her head and threaten to blow the bitch’s brains out if the police didn’t drop their guns.  And the police drop their guns saying “Please don’t hurt her.”  Only in this case it’s America that Obama has held the gun to.  And it’s been Republicans backing down time and time again.  Obama has NEVER negotiated with the Republicans.  He’s basically said, “I’ll take this country right over the edge if you don’t give me what I want.”  And it’s worked for him.

But it won’t sure work with Putin.  To continue, Obama could play chicken with Republicans because Republicans are terrified of seeing their country be driven right off a cliff.  But that won’t play with Putin, anymore than the media demonization trick will play with Putin.  Putin just doesn’t care about America just like Obama doesn’t care about America.  And so Obama is exposed as the weak, trivial, cowardly incompetent fool that he is.

So Obama’s Secretary of State John Kerry and then Obama’s Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel “warn” Russia to stay out of the Ukraine.  But what is that?  Just a bunch of blathering words from inconsequential cowards and phonies who can be TRUSTED not to do a damn thing while America’s gets its face grabbed and has its nose rubbed in its own feces.  Vladimir Putin knows for a damn fact that Obama will do NOTHING.

What do you think are the odds that Obama’s gutless weakness to make the American military its weakest since before World War II was the inspiration for Putin in Ukraine to pull a Hitler in Czechoslovakia?  Try 100 percent.  What did I say?  Weakness is the ULTIMATE provocation.

And then Obama gives a press conference in which he says absolutely nothing worth repeating.  Both our allies and our enemies were frankly shocked at Obama’s weakness that was put on display.  Remember George H.W. Bush who said, “This will NOT stand!” when Iraq invaded Kuwait?  And it didn’t.  Because Bush TOOK a stand.  Obama just blathered on like the babbling idiot that he is.  And nobody is listening to him because he doesn’t matter.  Syria wasn’t listening to the disgrace when he gave his “red line” warning that he allowed Syria to cross about twenty damn times before caving in to Putin’s (Syria’s staunch ally, fwiw) negotiations.  And why the hell would Putin listen now after all the times he’s punked Obama?

I’d say the left aren’t mocking Mitt Romney or Sarah Palin now, but the left and the mainstream media who prop them up with their propaganda are so pathologically dishonest that they merely re-write history.  And they never ever have to apologize for having been so wrong because they never admit they were wrong in the first place.  That would take honesty and integrity, neither of which any liberal has.

So no matter how completely wrong and proven to be completely wrong they are, they don’t even skip a beat.  And most people never know what genuine fools we have leading us or what wise people we COULD have had leading us if we had only just not listened to the idiocy of the complete fools.

Just take this as yet another proof that to be a Democrat is to be a demon-possessed fool and a liar without shame.

What would Ronald Reagan have done?  K.T. McFarland – a foreign policy expert under Reagan – channeled his wisdom.  Reagan would have recognized – as he recognized when he was president at the height of the Cold War – that Russia’s chief vulnerability is economics.  A couple of decades ago, Vladimir Putin wrote his doctoral dissertation acknowledging that the USSR collapsed economically.  Putin wrote that the key was to harness Russia’s vast oil and natural gas resources, make Europe dependent upon Russian oil and gas, exploit the political clout that would result from Europe’s dependence on Russian fossil fuels, and then use the revenues to rebuild the Russian military.  And that is precisely what Putin has done.  Reagan, McFarland says, would have targeted that.  Reagan would have rightly realized that Russia’s chief vulnerability is STILL economics: Reagan would have offered to sell U.S. oil and gas – which we could have FAR more of if it weren’t for Obama’s stupid policies – to undercut the Russians.  He would further have provided the fracking technology – that Obama and his whackjob liberal base is so deadly opposed to – to our friends to undercut the price of oil which would be devastating to Russia’s economy and FORCE Russia to fly straight or pay dearly.  And of course Reagan would have reinstituted the missile defense treaty that Obama stupidly rescinded after telling Putin that he would be “more flexible” to bowing down to Putin after Obama’s reelection.  Obama proceeded to follow through with his bowing down to Putin by reneging on the missile defense treaty in question.

Under Reagan, that treaty would be brought back to the table and Reagan would make Putin HOWL as the Ukraine was taken away from his dream of a return to empire for good.

Reagan would also invite Ukraine into the protection of the NATO alliance and simply let Putin know that if he didn’t get the hell out he’d be in a shooting war with NATO.  Reagan would punch Russia in the nose by freezing all bank assets held by Russians in the nation of every bank who will side with us (and Russia and Russians have HUGE assets in US and European banks).  Reagan would forbid all travel of Russian citizens and isolate the Russian people that way to pressure Putin to withdraw.  If there was a sanction that would really hurt Russia or really piss them off, he would issue that sanction.

You don’t HAVE to go to a full-fledged shooting war to show some resolve.  Reagan understood that.  And, interestingly, after the USSR collapsed we found out that the moment that shocked the Russians into fearing Reagan was when he fired the 11+ thousand striking air traffic controllers after ordering them to report to work or be fired.  They realized he would follow through with his threats and do what he said he would do.  Obama has long since squandered that kind of perception of integrity – but he did it with a giant exclamation mark when he gave Putin’s ally Syria a “red line” and then failed to do jack squat when they repeatedly crossed that red line.

Of course Ronald Reagan had four things Obama lacks: a wise worldview, strategic foresight, common sense and moral courage.

About these ads

Tags: , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “Sarah Palin And Mitt Romney Completely RIGHT On Ukraine And Russia VS Barack Obama Who’s Just A Complete FOOL”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    well said—-everything you pointed out about our Shakedown-Artist-in-Chief was dead-on.

  2. LookOUt Says:

    1. Your commentary might be more effective without the generic slur an liberals. “That would take honesty and integrity, neither of which any liberal has.” The word has a broad application, including everything from traitors to veterans.
    2. You seem to assume that Obama is diminishing American influence and power by accident via idiocy. Many Democrats and leftists desire the diminution of American influence; how are you sure the their President does not desire the same?

  3. Michael Eden Says:

    LookOUt,

    You are incorrect about your #2. I think I state very clearly that Barack Obama has ZERO love for America. It isn’t merely incompetence, but incompetence plus outright MALICE that Obama is bringing down American influence. Right now, this situation in Ukraine isn’t about U.S. national security or American prestige to Obama; it is solely about Obama to Obama.

    You ARE right that liberals actually DESIRE “the diminution of American influence.” But that only serves to undercut your #1, that I’m wrong to provide a ” generic slur an [sic] liberals.”

    Obama AGAIN has been THE leader in desiring a weakening of America, beginning with his infamous “apology tour” and continuing with his hostility toward American exceptionalism which he has been rightly criticized for from the right.

    It is amazing: never in all of human history until this time has there ever been a group of pathetic, nihilistic ideologues so morally stupid as to hope their nation becomes WEAKER. And thanks to the policies of Democrats, they have gotten their wish: America is now weaker in its domestic economy, with the lowest labor participation rate measuring working-age adults who actually have a damn JOB since the LAST time a gutless liberal fool ran America. We are weaker in our national security, with Obama literally having so gutted the military that it is now weaker than at any time since BEFORE we were deemed weak enough to attack on our own soil at Pearl Harbor to begin WWII for us. And we are weaker in our diplomacy as NONE of our former allies trust us and ALL of our enemies have become far more emboldened by Obama’s WEAKNESS.

    So I have to thank you for actually providing the grounds to refute yourself in your point #1. Because damn are liberals ever depraved.

    Overall, I’ll tell you what: when Obama gave his State of the Union and informed us that he would ignore the Constitution and abrogate the separation of powers and every single Democrat stood up and cheered, yes, ALL liberals are genuinely fascist and genuinely evil.

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    Thanks, Anomymous

  5. Beeker D. Says:

    I truly am thankful for your site. ‘God Bless You’ and you sure have got this ‘Feckless Fascist 0bama’ PEGGED!

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    Beeker D.,

    Thanks much. On THIS particular issue, I had not even BEGAN to see just how incredibly feckless and historically pathetic Barack Obama is. Wait till you see what I have today!

  7. Anonymous Says:

    funny how you idiots jump on the one and only thing that moron ever said that was close to being correct. even a broken clock is right twice a day

  8. Michael Eden Says:

    Anonymous,

    Well, all I can say is that is at least TWICE as often as you’ve ever been right in your whole life. Because you’ve never even been right ONCE by random accident.

    When Sarah Palin was proven so completely right on such a critical issue and your moron messiah was proven so disastrously wrong, and you STILL mock her, that proves that you are simply pathologically and rabidly stupid. Because you are the very worst kind of “stupid”: you are determined to be stupid even when your enemy is right and you know she is right and the fact that she is right doesn’t matter to you.

    There’s another word for that kind of “stupid”. It is “evil.” It’s the kind of evil that Satan – who knows he’s wrong but doesn’t care – has.

    Your kind of stupidity actually demonstrates precisely why Obama is such a reckless and dangerous fool. Because he’s just like you: no matter how obviously wrong people like you and Obama are, it doesn’t matter. You are morally incapable of EVER receiving correction. You rather just keep doubling down on dumb and then dumber and then dumber still, ad infinitum, ad nauseum. You’ll never be capable of ever wising up because you just rabidly continue to mock the truth.

    Now get lost. I don’t waste time on people who can’t refute a single thing I say but offer a sneering drive-by comment anyway. If I DID waste time arguing with the likes of you, I really WOULD be an “idiot.”

  9. Manu Says:

    I got a headache reading this bs. Romney and Sarah never ever mentioned Ukraine. If they did someone from inner circles had the idea of CIA messing with Ukraine. Just like when Reagan used CIA to topple jimmy carter during Iran’s problem. And, later backfired on him. I am surprised that intelligent people quote idiots for glory. Romney and Sarah two fortune tellers are quoted as know it all.

  10. Michael Eden Says:

    Manu,

    I get a headache dealing with dishonest fools such as yourself. Dumbass, I quoted Sarah Palin’s prediction of Putin invading Ukraine from an article on October 22, 2008. That article actually features a clip from MSNBC of Sarah Palin saying these words:

    “After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama’s reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia’s Putin to invade Ukraine next.”

    The funniest thing about the link I cite is that it is a liberal perspective mocking Sarah Palin for being such an idiot that she would predict WHAT HISTORY NOW RECORDS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED AND IS HAPPENING NOW.

    You are wrong. You are even WORSE than wrong: you are a LIAR.

    I block liars, because there is no way one can have an intelligent conversation with somebody who simply ignores factual reality. So get lost.

    Now where’s my damn Tylenol???

  11. chuquestaquenumber1 Says:

    Why are all of you giving W a free pass for his weakness when putin invaded Georgia ?

  12. Michael Eden Says:

    chuquestaquenumber1,

    I’m actually smart enough to explain that to you. It’s too bad that you’re too dumb to figure this out for yourself, which means you’re probably not smart enough to understand it even when somebody explains it to you.

    George W. Bush had less than three months remaining in his presidency when Putin invaded Georgia. His presidency was O.V.E.R. I know, I know, you can’t quite understand such concepts as “time” and how it kind of matters when a president has days left in office as opposed to years left in office. But for us humans created in God’s image with minds to understand, that turns out to be relevant.

    To add to Bush’s dilemma here, he was being so viciously demonized for being a warmonger by the opposition party that it was beyond unreal.

    So let’s sum up what we have so far: Bush had less than three months left in office before he was out and his opponents were demonizing him as a warmonger.

    Now, understanding that you are far, FAR dumber than my dog, I’m trying to be patient here: what would have happened had Bush dealt strongly with Putin? What do you think the Democrat Party and Obama would have done???

    My dog actually knows the answer to this one, but I have no doubt you don’t, so I’ll just tell you: they would have come so unglued and so viciously demonized him it would have been UNREAL.

    Putin even THEN knew that he had a friend and an ally in the Democrat Party and in Obama.

    Putin knew that in Obama he would have an ally who would be “more flexible” to the fascist agenda particularly after the 2012 election when Obama would utterly betray America.

    My dog is also smart enough to understand that while the Democrats would have viciously attacked Bush had he done the right thing, Obama’s opponents – the Republicans – would have cheered and supported him had Obama shown that America had any kind of spine or integrity or courage under Obama. You see, there is a profound difference between the two parties, with one being the party of anti-American treason and the other being the party that wants a strong America.

    And my dog knows one from the other. Because he’s a pretty smart dog.

    Harry Reid declared defeat in Iraq. I still remember: he said, “This war is lost.” Harry Reid is a Democrat and therefore a complete disgrace to America, as even Obama’s own Secretary of Defense pointed out. Gates said Reid’s comment was “one of the most disgraceful things I’ve ever heard a politician say.”

    Now, that was nothing new. I remember earlier in the war (the war that 60% of Senate Democrats voted for only to treacherously and treasonously demonize because they are cynical cowards) when Democrats literally hoped General Petraueus would announce defeat for America. That’s right: House Majority Whip Representative James Clyburn said that good news in Iraq amounted to a problem for Democrats.

    Now, we DID stay the course. And Bush turned the war around with the surge that traitorous, treasonous Democrats tried so hard to stop. They wanted America to lose, to be defeated, because blaming Bush was far more important to them than anything good happening for America. But yeah, Bush so turned the war around that Obama and Biden began to say it was actually THEIR victory. Bush left a safe, stable Iraq behind.

    Here are a couple of examples of what Obama and Biden said:

    » “I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.” — Joe Biden
    » “This strategy is grounded in a clear and achievable goal shared by the Iraqi people and the American people: an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.” — Barack Obama, 2011
    » “[W]e will work to promote an Iraqi government that is just, representative, and accountable, and that provides neither support nor safe haven to terrorists.” – Barack Obama, 2011

    But Iraq is now a terrorist caliphate, thanks to Obama. Obama is a liar; he claims he tried oh-so hard to get a status of forces agreement. BULLSHIT. It is a documented FACT OF HISTORY that Barack Obama was hell-bent on removing ALL US forces from Iraq the day that turd took office:

    WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

    But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

    Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

    Obama cut-and-ran out; the terrorist group ISIS that is even WORSE than al Qaeda poured in to create the caliphate that Osama bin Laden dreamed of.

    Had Obama kept the few thousand US troops in that Bush planned and that Petraeus planned ISIS never would have gained a foothold in Iraq. But we’ve got a Traitor-in-Chief now.

    And our “more flexible” Obama is able to twist America past the breaking point of its national spine.

    So anyway, that’s the difference. Obama has two years left in his “more flexible” presidency; Bush had two months left in office. Obama and Democrats demonized Bush for being strong and literally deliberately try to lose wars by political sabotage; Bush and Republicans only want a strong America that can actually WIN a war.

    And there’s your difference.

    America will NEVER win another war as long as there is so much as ONE Democrat who hasn’t been hunted down with dogs and burned alive. And even if we DO win a war – as we did in Iraq – Democrats will betray America so that the terrorists regain everything we fought and died to win.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 537 other followers

%d bloggers like this: