Columbine, Tucson, Aurora, Newtown. Liberals love to bring up these massacres as “evidence” that we need to ban guns.
But the thing is that, apart from some bizarre Hollywood film, there has NEVER been a single documented case of a gun EVER rising up by itself and deciding to start shooting people.
Liberals are free to try to refute me by documenting cases of guns developing independent consciousness and choosing to go on murderous rampages. Until then, my statement stands as fact.
But now let’s briefly consider the worldviews of the people who actually pulled the damn trigger of those guns. Let’s look at the belief systems of the PEOPLE who committed those murders. You know, rather than contemplating the worldviews of guns that non-liberals understand DO NOT HAVE WORLDVIEWS.
The Columbine killers were atheists who glorified in their atheism. One of their quotes haunts me to this day. They recorded themselves claiming, “We are no longer human, for we have evolved beyond human morality.” In one of their notes they scribbled – and pardon the language – “Why give a fuck what Jesus would do?” And, “I blew off his head with one shot. I am god. He died.”
I welcome atheists to explain in detail how it would be impossible for mankind to ever “evolve” into the kind of alien cultures that wickedly prey on the weak and kill every sentient being they can get their tentacles on that we watched in movies like Independence Day. Remember that signature line from the film:
President Thomas Whitmore: I saw… its thoughts. I saw what they’re planning to do. They’re like locusts. They’re moving from planet to planet… their whole civilization. After they’ve consumed every natural resource they move on… and we’re next. Nuke ‘em. Let’s nuke the bastards.
Given that liberals love to demagogically and slanderously characterize conservatives in these terms, I demand that evolutionists explain to me how human beings could never so “evolve beyond human morality.”
I remember the exchange from the movie Alien:
Ash: You still don’t understand what you’re dealing with, do you? Perfect organism. Its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility.
Lambert: You admire it.
Ash: I admire its purity. A survivor… unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality.
I challenge the atheist with his implicit faith in evolution to demonstrate how it could never possibly happen that human beings could so “evolve beyond human morality” that we would likewise be “unclouded by conscience” and “delusions of morality.” Especially given the sheer number of human beings who have clearly DONE so.
I submit that there is little question that we are in fact as a culture “evolving beyond human morality.” Just take a look at the Supreme Court openly considering imposing sodomy in place of marriage while we re-elected the first openly pro-sodomite president. Which openly flies in the face of the entirety of human civilization and all previous “human morality.”
Liberals WANT the morality that was based entirely on Judeo-Christianity and the Judeo-Christian worldview to “evolve.” That is their most cherished goal.
Now, on my worldview of Judeo-Christianity, I have a very firm rebuttal to the Columbine killers. You did NOT “evolve” beyond human morality. Rather, you were created in the image of a holy God. And you will be held accountable to the morality that God created you to live out. What do you have in your moral arsenal to respond to this crisis, atheist?
Right now, according to Judeo-Christianity, the Columbine killers are screaming in hell. In a trillion years, they will be screaming in hell as God imposes the justice upon them that they denied to their victims. In a trillion times a trillion-trillion years, they will be viscerally screaming in hell in refutation of the vile atheist crap they believed that motivated their actions. They were profoundly and wickedly wrong; and all eternity will attest to that FACT. What punishment do YOU have to deter these moral monsters from committing these terrible crimes, atheist?
It is with this in mind that I recall the famous words of the liberal Supreme Court Justices expressed their opinion that the Ten Commandments – including the one about “Thou shalt not murder” – be forcibly taken down from shcools for the following reason:
“If the posted copies of the Ten Commandments are to have any effect at all, it will be to induce the schoolchildren to read, meditate upon, perhaps to venerate and obey, the Commandments… [which] is not a permissible … objective.”
Was it worth it, liberals? Was Columbine and all the other horrors that have followed worth your adventure into godlessness? Are you glad that Eric Harris and Dyland Klebold were never allowed the opportunity to read, meditate upon, and yes, perhaps even to venerate and obey, the Ten Commandments? Was it a good thing that disturbed people with an urge to mayhem were never exposed to the one reason NOT to indulge their murderous fantasies? If you have a superior reason not to murder than the Judeo-Christian one that you purged from society, perhaps it is time to share your secret.
Let’s take Jared Lee Loughner and his massacre at Tucson, Arizona.
As Loughner and Tierney grew closer, Tierney got used to spending the first ten minutes or so of every day together arguing with Loughner’s ”nihilist” view of the world. “By the time he was 19 or 20, he was really fascinated with semantics and how the world is really nothing—illusion,” Tierney says. Once, Tierney recalls, Loughner told him, “I’m pretty sure I’ve come to the conclusion that words mean nothing.” Loughner would also tell Tierney and his friends that life “means nothing,” and they’d reply, “If it means nothing, what you’re saying means nothing.”
And of course it DID mean nothing – expect to those famous secular humanist atheist thinkers who basically share in Loughner’s moral idiocy.
I’ve described precisely WHERE the belief system - that words mean nothing, that the world is really an illusion – of Jared Loughner originated from: it came from the philosophical systems and worldview of the left – from existentialism, from postmodernism, from secular humanism. And I’ve pointed out that these leftist ideas have CONSEQUENCES. These systems of thought don’t sit in the ivory towers of the secular humanist liberals who invent them. They spread like the malignant thought cancers that they are.
I’ve similarly posted this refutation of this mindless atheist evolutionary nihilist crap by Dr. Gleason Archer many times, so it isn’t hard to find:
“But it should be pointed out that consistent atheism, which represents itself to be the most rational and logical of all approaches to reality, is in actuality completely self-defeating and incapable of logical defense. That is to say, if indeed all matter has combined by mere chance, unguided by any Higher Power of Transcendental Intelligence, then it necessarily follows that the molecules of the human brain are also the product of mere chance. In other words, we think the way we do simply because the atoms and molecules of our brain tissue happen to have combined in the way they have, totally without transcendental guidance or control. So then even the philosophies of men, their system of logic and all their approaches to reality are the result of mere fortuity. There is no absolute validity to any argument advanced by the atheist against the position of theism.
On the basis of his won presuppositions, the atheist completely cancels himself out, for on his own premises his arguments are without any absolute validity. By his own confession he thinks the way he does simply because the atoms in his brain happen to combine the way they do. If this is so, he cannot honestly say that his view is any more valid than the contrary view of his opponent. His basic postulates are self-contradictory and self-defeating; for when he asserts that there are no absolutes, he thereby is asserting a very dogmatic absolute. Nor can he logically disprove the existence of God without resorting to a logic that depends on the existence of God for its validity. Apart from such a transcendent guarantor of the validity of logic, any attempts at logic or argumentation are simply manifestations of the behavior of the collocation of molecules that make up the thinker’s brain.”
Go ahead, secular humanist liberal. Go ahead, atheist. Show me how what Dr. Archer is saying doesn’t follow. Show me how the more you scramble something with random and by definition arbitrary evolutionary “progress,” the more ORDER you’ll get. Show me how you’re correct in asserting that mind necessarily comes from mindlessness rather than from Mind. Show me how your drivel is anything other than pure degradation – as St. Paul so eloquently states in Romans chapter one (in which St. Paul also points out that some cultures can sink so low into the moral sewer that it will welcome sodomy just as we are doing RIGHT NOW).
Let us also, through the writing of Dinesh D’Souza, consider what would happen to two tribes if one was religious in worldview and the other was atheist:
The Reverend Randy Alcorn, founder of Eternal Perspective ministries in Oregon, sometimes presents his audience with two creation stories and asks them whether it matters which one is true. In the secular account, “You are the descendant of a tiny cell of primordial protoplasm washed up on an empty beach three and a half billion years ago. You are the blind and arbitrary product of time, chance, and natural forces. You are a mere grab-bag of atomic particles, a conglomeration of genetic substance. You exist on a tiny planet in a minute solar system in an empty corner of a meaningless universe. You are a purely biological entity, different only in degree but not in kind from a microbe, virus, or amoeba. You have no essence beyond your body, and at death you will cease to exist entirely. In short, you came from nothing and are going nowhere.
In the Christian view, by contrast, “You are the special creation of a good and all-powerful God. You are created in His image, with capacities to think, feel and worship that set you above all other life forms. You differ from the animals not simply in degree but in kind. Not only is your kind unique, but you are unique among your kind. Your Creator loves you so much and so intensely desires your companionship and affection that He has a perfect plan for your life. In addition, God gave the life of His only Son that you might spend eternity with Him. If you are willing to accept the gift of salvation, you can become a child of God.”
Now imagine the two groups of people – let’s call them the secular tribe and the religious tribe – who subscribe to these two worldviews. Which of the two tribes is more likely to survive, prosper and multiply? The religious tribe is made up of people who have an animating sense of purpose. The secular tribe is made up of people who are not sure why they exist at all. The religious tribe is composed of individuals who view their every thought and action as consequential. The secular tribe is made up of matter that cannot explain why it is able to think at all. — Dinish D’Souza, What’s So Great About Christianity, pp. 15-16
We’ve actually seen this experiment played out in actual human history as we’ve seen the rise of an America founded upon the Judeo-Christian worldview versus the society of the godless French Revolution and its resulting Reign of Terror; versus the rise of godless Marxism and its degeneration into state atheist Stalinism with over forty million of its own people murdered during peacetime; versus the rise of state atheist Maoism and its murder of over sixty million of its own people during peacetime; versus the crushing of the human spirit in state atheist Cambodia where over a million were murdered in the Killing Fields; and versus the godless tyrant regime of state atheist North Korea and the fact that the entire nation is dark at night.
But since when did FACTS ever matter to the left? Even when there have been more than 100 million “facts” murdered by their official state atheism.
Which is precisely why we are moving in the direction of socialism and communism today. Because the Democrat Party consists of secular humanists, liberals, atheists who all have the same agenda: to reshape society by reshaping the economies of the world in their image.
You want to ban something? I suggest we ban a godless left-wing State that has all the guns versus a disarmed and oppressed people who were promised Utopia but have nothing but misery and the very sort of propaganda that we are seeing right now in America to feed them the manure of self-serving lies.
I would suggest banning that instead of going the opposite direction as Democrats demand.
Let’s continue our tour to Aurora, Colorado and the warped worldview that perpetrated it. He went from murderer to Muslim. Which given the rabid tendency of Islam to produce terrorists isn’t that far of a stretch.
Let’s look our show to Newtown/Sandy Hook and consider the worldview of the ghostly little creep who murdered 26 people in a school that had no armed security of any kind:
The Sandy Hook gunman worshiped the devil and had an online page dedicated to Satan, a former classmate revealed, as his childhood barber recalls Adam Lanza never spoke and would stare at the floor every time he had his hair cut.
Lanza’s worshiping page had the word ‘Devil’ written in red, Gothic-style letters against a black background, Trevor L. Todd told The National Enquirer, something which he said was ‘weird’ and ‘gave him the chills’.
The FBI are trying to piece together his smashed up hard drive to see if his online footprint will reveal any motive for the killing, but they strongly believe he made use of devil-worshiping and suicide sites and boasted of his murder plans on message forums.
I actually saw claims by atheists that this turd was a “Christian” because his desperate, troubled mother took him to church a few times.
You moral idiots, I can not only walk into a garage, but even lie down on the concrete and start calling myself a “car.” If Adam Lanza was a “Christian” because somebody else took him to a church and he sat in the pew, I guess that makes me a “car.” Let’s see four of you moral imbeciles climb into me and start driving me down the road on my nonexistent wheels. I hope I’ll get really crappy gas mileage, just to irritate you.
Let’s get one thing straight. Rather than banning guns, let’s try banning all these idiotic and depraved worldviews instead.
Now, some of you are shouting that that would violate the Constitution. But that never stopped you leftists before. Just as it’s not stopping you now as you stomp all over the 2nd Amendment.
The day that you secular humanist liberals manage to melt every gun down and turn it into ploughshares – as the Holy Bible declares that Messiah will one day do during the Millennium when He reigns as King of kings and as Lord of lords – then you won’t be a crazy fascist nutjob. Until then, you are crazy fascist nutjobs. Because the simple fact is that you CAN’T ban guns; you can only pass laws that prevent LAW-ABIDING citizens from being able to legally buy them as criminals couldn’t give less of a damn about your stupid laws.
I pointed out this inconvenient truth about other Dianne Feinstein attempts to stop crime by criminalizing legal products. Thanks in large part to liberal Democrat Feinstein, it is now incredibly difficult for anyone to purchase pseudoephedrine – a prime ingredient of “meth” and “crank” – except for the criminals who have explodied meth production as a result. Her proposed ban on assault weapons does little more than treat law-abiding citizens like criminals even as liberals treat criminals like law-abiding citizens.
Secular humanist liberals stupidly think that human nature is something infinitely malleable, something they can mold and shape by replacing God with “the State.” They foolishly think that the GUN has the depraved worldview rather than the mind of the person who is pulling the trigger. They think that they can control human behavior by controlling human environment.
In reality, they are the very ones who are producing these sick, evil minds. In reality, when you criminalize guns you only allow the criminals who don’t give a damn about your stupid laws to possess them. In reality, when you criminalize guns, you only keep law-abiding citizens from having the means to protect themselves.
By the way, Adam Lanza parked his vehicle in a fire lane. I know that’s impossible, because it’s illegal to park in a fire lane. But that’s what he did. That’s the “respect” psychos have for your stupid laws. That’s how successful all your stupid laws are in deterring crime. And in the same way, NONE of the bans or regulations that Obama is proposing as he hypes and demagogues Newtown would have done ANYTHING to prevent the very mayhem that he is so cynically exploiting.
A pro-2nd Amendment rape victim asked the question, “How does rendering me defenseless protect you against a violent crime?” I demand that question be answered.
How does it? How does abrogating the right and the ability of self-defense to the government – a government whose president literally fearmongered to take away the police as he deceitfully demagogued the sequester - do that? Why should I surrender my own security and protection as a law-abiding citizen to a president who literally threatened to withhold the police protection that I would as a result of his policies depend on for my survival unless I agree to his massive tax hikes? Why should the American people make themselves hostages to an incredibly cynical political agenda?
Under secular humanism, i.e., under liberalism, no one is responsible for their actions – just as no one is to be given any credit for their hard work or the wealth that they earn as a result of their efforts – and therefore ANYBODY can go nuts at any time and therefore NO ONE should be allowed to possess a gun even as no one should be allowed to work hard and keep the wealth they earned. Except liberals and the government they erect to advance liberal fascism. Society is to blame when murders murder; society is to be credited when rich people work hard and become rich. Individual responsibility and individual credit alike are anathema to the left. We are herd animals; only the herd matters.
And liberals – who invariably manage to exempt themselves from all their edicts – hypocritically view themselves as having some sole mandate to rule over all others and crush all opposition to their rule. Society is all that matters; and they get to dominate that society.
We find that Obama has been the WORST president when it actually comes to enforcing the gun laws already on the books. Just as his home city of libturd Chicago is the worst city in the nation at enforcing the laws already on the books. These people don’t want to protect the defenseless; they want to exploit the tragedies that their policies create in order to impose more fascist control over the people and render them more and more and more powerless to defend themselves and defend their Constitution from government tyranny.
Every single tyrant regime on earth – whether it be Nazi Germany, or Stalinist Russia, or Kim Jong-Un’s North Korea – seized guns from the people before they imposed their godless agenda. Every single one. And now we’re following the same path toward slavery and the ultimate crushing of the human spirit.
That was the whole point of the 2nd Amendment: it was to be the people’s protection against future government tyranny.
Since we’ve already seemingly decided that the Constitution isn’t worth its weight in bovine manure, why don’t we just cut to the heart of the matter and ban something that will actually stop the mayhem??? Why don’t we ban secular humanism? Why don’t we ban atheism? Why don’t we ban murderous political systems masquerading as religious systems like Islam does?
In reality, over 55 million innocent human beings have been murdered by Obama’s demonic abortion hell pits. As opposed to the relatively miniscule number of children killed in gun homicides. If you care about children, why do you smile sweetly at the millions of precious babies murdered by your abortion??? Why should anybody give one damn when holocaust baby murdering liberals demand children be “protected” by fascist gun laws? And why is it that it is LIBERAL cities like Obama’s home city of Chicago - rather than the pro-gun conservative areas – where all the children are being murdered as law-abiding people are rendered defenseless and helpless? Why is it that the murderous policies of liberalism become the basis for even more murderous policies of liberalism?
We’ve got a Democrat doctor right now on trial for delivering numerous babies alive so he could have an easier time slashing their little spines and throats with his scalpel. Just as we have a Democrat professor demanding that his students stomp on Jesus and everything Jesus stood for.
Why don’t we ban Obama? Why don’t we criminalize the Democrat Party?
But of course we’re not going to do those things, are we?
The beast will be celebrated, worshiped and praised by the Democrat Party that actually voted to remove God from its Party platform. He will be celebrated, worshiped and praised by the same Party whose representatives demanded that the idiot youth whose morally-warped minds Democrats have captured stomped on the name of Jesus. He will be celebrated, worshiped and praised by the same Party that is now exalting in the homosexual sodomy that God in His Word declared to be an abomination.
That’s why when the beast of the Book of Revelation comes, there will BE no guns for people to protect themselves with. And every single Democrat will eagerly worship the beast and take his mark on their right hands or on their foreheads.
You’ll get yours, Democrat. In the exact same place where the Columbine killers are already getting theirs. Your day is coming.
As a P.S. of how liberalism is to blame for these savage murders, it turns out that thirty years ago, a family could petition a court to declare a family member crazy and have him or her committed. But guess who decided that was inhumane? You guessed right: ACLU liberals. Liberals, understanding that liberalism is a mental disease, figured that it was better to keep these psychotic lunatics outside where they could vote Democrat than locking them up and putting them in rubber rooms where they belong.
As a P.P.S. of how liberalism is to blame for these savage murders, it similiarly turns out that Hollywood liberalism is responsible for both the violent movies – which glorify violence – and the video games that literally teach kids how to kill while desensitizing them to the violence they commit. And again, liberals, apparently understanding that they are entrenching a violence-laden culture, could do something about this problem they created if they wanted. But they would rather cynically exploit their culture of violence by blaming it on guns. And of course, on Republicans.
Should I add a P.P.P.S. about liberals and rap music that glorifies violence, hostility toward women and the lowest form of gang-banging nihilism???