Keep in mind that the mainstream media (CBS being the primary culprit) posted video of George Zimmerman being arrested and claimed that there were “no apparent injuries” to Zimmerman. And all the screeching liberals then stated as fact that George Zimmerman was a cold-blooded murderer, etc, etc.
It didn’t matter that it was a giant load of crap. The liberal media is to “truth” what the sun is to “cold”; neither has so much as an iota of the aforementioned qualities.
There is no question that this picture obtained by ABC was taken by the officers at the shooting scene:
This simple FACT was obvious from the very start in the police report:
“While I was in such close contact with Zimmerman, I could observe that his back appeared to be wet and was covered in grass, as if he had been laying on his back on the ground. Zimmerman was also bleeding from the nose and back of his head.”
No apparent injuries George Zimmerman’s bleeding head! But there’s nothing wrong with being wrong as long as you’re serving as one of the faithful attack dogs for liberalism and political correctness, is there. Which is why their blatantly obvious act of biased and deceitful reporting is simply whistled away.
One of the other things that was interesting that came out today was just how incredibly ”Hispanic” Zimmerman looked:
In spite of everything the media did to try to cover that up so they could make him “white” – and therefore destroy him as a “racist bigot”:
Exhibit A: “Martin, who was black, was on his way to a convenience store in a mostly white gated community when George Zimmerman, who is white, shot and killed him after a disputed altercation.” — Gwen Ifill, PBS ”Newshour” anchor
Exhibit B: ABC deliberately altered the George Zimmerman booking photo to make him appear “white”:
THIS was the effect that the media was trying to create in doctoring/altering the photo to turn George Zimmerman into “whitey”:
It would have been a lot harder to fabricate if George Zimmerman had been Hispanic instead of the “pussy ass cracker” the mainstream media propaganda mill made him into. It’s wrong to hate on Hispanics, of course, but every self-respecting liberal despises whitey – especially if that liberal is himself or herself white. Self-hating whitey has been a requirement for liberals since Karl Marx came along and showed the left how to properly self-hate:
There were also great Jewish philosophers who suffered from an aggravated confusion over their Jewish identities. Karl Marx is perhaps the most extreme example of this. It is curious to note that both his mother and father were the offspring of rabbis. Marx’s father, who became a prominent Russian Jewish lawyer, converted to Protestantism because of an edict prohibiting Jews from being legal advocates. In Marx’s own materialistic interpretation of the world, he found no place for a valid Jewish experience. In his essay “Zur Judenfrage” (“About the JewishQuestion”) he wrote:
“What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money…Out of its entrails bourgeois society continually creates Jews.” [Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 11, pp. 1071- 1074]
How ironic that Marx’s view of his own Jewish people became a view of Hitler, who boasted of his anti-Communism.
And of course there was nothing “ironic” about it: Nothing would have made Karl Marx happier than to find out that somebody was “inspired” by his writings to put 6 million of his fellow Jews into gas chambers; just like nothing would make a white liberal happier than having his own race marginalized and demonized in a “multi-cultural society.” The liberal mind is a diseased mind; and self-loathing is the fruit of a diseased mind.
Exhibit C: The New York Times infamously labelling George Zimmerman as a “white Hispanic” in defiance of their very own “political correctness” and in frightening similarity to the Nazi Mischling laws of the 1930s that attempted to categorize how “Jewish” one was:
Mr. Zimmerman, 28, a white Hispanic, told the police that he shot Trayvon in self-defense after an altercation. The teenager was walking home from a convenience store, where he bought iced tea and Skittles, when he was shot once in the chest.
Let’s try that: Mr. Obama, 50, a white African-American, lied to the American people again today…
Nope. Sounds pretty damn racist.
The Washington Times puts a lot of the mainstream media propaganda shenanigans together:
I see that the New York Times let us know the dastardly George Zimmerman was a “white Hispanic” – and the Times seems to have put an emphasis on “white.” However, it did not tell the general public that Mr. Zimmerman is a registered Democrat.
Now we learn that the NBC News department left off the question from the police dispatcher asking Mr. Zimmerman the race of the person he was following, Trayvon Martin. Why was that omitted? In both cases, the omissions seem to have been made only to support the developing narrative that mean, white George Zimmerman is a racist.
How could the New York Times make the distinction that he was white? And leaving out the question from the dispatcher as to the race of the person being followed made it appear that Mr. Zimmerman could have been targeting Trayvon for his race. By now everyone must know that ABC News also got to take a few shots at Mr. Zimmerman. When broadcasting a video of him, ABC conveniently covered the back of his head with a banner on the screen. After receiving many complaints, they removed the banner, and then you could see it appeared that Mr. Zimmerman had some kind of cut on the back of his head. Dare I ask again why this happened? Was the object to tell this story, or was it to hide the truth?
Then there’s the crap they pulled with Trayvon Martin by bombarding us with pictures of a smiling little twelve-year old boy:
Instead of what he really looked like at the time George Zimmerman saw him:
Let’s try that with another sweet-faced and obviously innocent guy:
Charles Manson was a charming young kid who couldn’t have done anything wrong and that picture proves it.
And of course the same mainstream media propaganda machine that pimped pictures of a twelve-year-old and clearly “innocent” Trayvon Martin rather than showing him for what he was when it MATTERED (the night of the shooting) simultaneously used a booking photo from the worst moment in George Zimmerman’s life. And then doctored it to frame him even FURTHER in the court of public opinion.
ALL of the mainstream media has been convicted for obvious bias and deceit.
NBC despicably altered the 911 call audio to deceitfully make it appear that George Zimmerman was a racist who was out to emphasize that Trayvon Martin was black:
The Today show’s segment, which included an ellipsis on screen to indicate omitted text, ran as:
Zimmerman: ‘This guy looks like he’s up to no good …’
Zimmerman: ‘He looks black.’
The full conversation ran as:
Zimmerman: ‘This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.’
Dispatcher: ‘OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?’
Zimmerman: ‘He looks black.’
NBC literally tried to explain that this was just some perfectly innocent error, that some engineer somehow accidentally happened to inadvertently erase the dispatcher’s voice and it was all just completely innocent. And only a diseased liberal mind would accept that “explanation,” just as only a diseased liberal mind would try to fabricate “evidence” to falsely turn a man into a “racist” to begin with.
In the same way, CNN “enhanced” the 911 audio to “prove” that George Zimmerman was a racist bigot who said – and excuse the language here – “fucking coons” during the 911 call. BUT IT WAS A LIE:
Recently, CNN enhanced audio of George Zimmerman — the man who shot Trayvon Martin — to try to determine if he did, in fact, use a racial slur while calling police on the night of the shooting. Back then, it sounded like Zimmerman might have used the phrase “fu**ing coons,” and his critics have cited it as evidence of a racially-motivated attack. But now CNN has enhanced the audio again, and the reporter is casting doubts that the term was used.
(Related: ‘This Is for Trayvon’: 6 Youths Attack 78-Year-Old Man in Alleged Racially-Charged Attack)
“It certainly sounds like that word to me,” Gary Tuckman said when the audio was first enhanced. But after the latest enhancement, he’s not so sure:
“Now it does sound less like that racial slur. … From listening in this room, and this is a state-of-the-art room, it doesn’t sound like that slur anymore. It sounds like … we‘re hearing the swear word at first and then the word ’cold.’ And the reason some say that would be relevant, is because it was unseasonably cold in Florida that night and raining.”
The audio expert agreed it sounded like “cold,” and said the new method gets rid of a lot more background noise but doesn’t change the voice or words.
Sorry we fabricated evidence to turn you into a racist and incite pretty much the entire black community to want to murder you and your entire family, George. Our boo-boo. Sorry we helped destroy your life and all.
A further lie that I have heard reported over and over again is that George Zimmerman continued to follow Trayvon Martin after he was instructed to stop. The evidence simply does not support that; rather, it supports Zimmerman’s account that after being instructed to stop following Martin he got a final address and then began heading back to his truck:
From the call released by the Sanford Police:
At 2:07, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, “He’s running.”
At 2:09, you can hear a car door open and an alarm begins that is undoubtedly the “door open, keys in ignition” warning on Zimmerman’s truck.
At 2:13, you can clearly hear the car door slamming shut, and the alarm stops.
At 2:17, Zimmerman’s voice wobbles and he starts breathing heavily into the phone, indicating that he has started running.
At 2:22, without any prompting other than the aforementioned noises and breathing, the dispatcher asks “Are you following him?” to which Zimmerman responds, “Yeah.”
At 2:26, the dispatcher says, “Okay, we don’t need you to do that,” to which Zimmerman responds, “Okay.”
Zimmerman proceeds to give the dispatcher his name. Then he says, “He ran.”
Zimmerman can still be heard breathing into the phone until about 2:39, at which point the heavy breathing stops entirely, a mere 13 seconds after the dispatcher asked him to stop following. A very calm and collected Zimmerman then proceeds to give the dispatcher his own information, directions and a description of his location for another 1 minute and 33 seconds.
The difference between someone running while on the phone and not running can be heard quite clearly, and I encourage readers to listen for themselves.
There’s another reason to believe that Zimmerman stopped following Martin: After he gives the dispatcher his personal address, at 3:35, he says, “Oh crap, I don’t want to give that all out. I don’t know where this kid is,” meaning he is worried Martin might hear where he lives. If Zimmerman doesn’t even know where Martin is, would it even be possible for him to still be following Martin at this point? Would it even be possible for him to have continued following Martin after hanging up the phone — a full two minutes after he first got out of his car and a minute and a half after he fully stops breathing heavily — unless Martin came back and revealed himself?
It was a mistake for Zimmerman to leave his car in the first place. But while the audio may not decisively prove that Zimmerman stopped following Martin when the dispatcher asked him to, it is very strong evidence that he did, especially when coupled with his testimony to police the night of the incident. But that isn’t even the point.
The point is this: With no witnesses stating that Zimmerman defied the dispatcher’s wishes and continued following Martin and no evidence to suggest he did, how did the idea that he pursued Martin after the dispatcher told him not to become a universally recognized, undisputed fact?
That it did is a testament to Al Sharpton’s ability to manipulate the media — and the media’s willingness to be manipulated.
The eyewitness in this case has almost completely confirmed George Zimmerman’s account of what happened that night:
But one man’s testimony could be key for the police.
“The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911,” he said.
Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.
The witness only wanted to be identified as “John,” and didn’t not want to be shown on camera.
His statements to police were instrumental, because police backed up Zimmerman’s claims, saying those screams on the 911 call are those of Zimmerman.
“When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point,” John said.
Zimmerman says the shooting was self defense. According to information released on the Sanford city website, Zimmerman said he was going back to his SUV when he was attacked by the teen.
Sanford police say Zimmerman was bloody in his face and head, and the back of his shirt was wet and had grass stains, indicating a struggle took place before the shooting
The police report that night also corroborates Zimmerman’s account:
According to the initial police report, Zimmerman, 28, told police he was screaming for help and that no one would help him. The report also said Zimmerman was bleeding from the nose and the back of the head.
Officials said in the report that Zimmerman’s back appeared wet and that he was covered in grass.
Nevertheless, there is widespread reports from the same biased and dishonest and slanted sources as did all the OTHER crap reporting that the cry for help could not have been George Zimmerman.
This is the liberalism and the news media propaganda that I have been describing for four years now. It is evil; it is based on lies and pure distilled deceit on a daily basis. And the more “established” and the more “elite” the media is – The New York Times, ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC – the more dishonest and biased it is.
Liberals might respond and say something like, “But it was those liberal media that corrected themselves.” I’ve got two responses: the first is that the only reason the leftwing propaganda corrected their own lies is because honest media confronted them with their lies and forced them to make the corrections. For example, in the case of NBC fabricating the 911 audio to remove the dispatcher asking Zimmerman to identify Trayvon Martin’s race we find:
NBC News issued an apology today for the way it edited a broadcast of a conversation between George Zimmerman and a police dispatcher before teenager Trayvon Martin was killed.
Last week Fox News did a report in which it presented ‘before’ and ‘after’ versions of the call. NBC had broadcast the edited exchange on its flagship ‘Today’ morning show.
NBC News launched an investigation after the Fox report. ‘During our investigation it became evident that there was an error made in the production process that we deeply regret,’ NBC News representative Lauren Kapp said in a statement on Tuesday.
If Fox News hadn’t been there to report the TRUTH – and liberals HATE Fox News FOR reporting the truth – that story would have never been refuted or corrected.
My second response is that opening the barn door after the horses have burned to death doesn’t exactly save the horses. This gets to Mark Twain’s famous quip that a lie gets halfway around the world before the truth can get its boots on. The media have got EXACTLY what they wanted: they have poisoned the country against George Zimmerman and flamed the fire of racist hate in the black community which largely continues to believe ALL of the above now-documented lies.
The judge frankly ought to dismiss this case and tell the black community – which is already beyond outraged after all the lies they have been told – that if they want to go after the people who are to blame for the case being thrown out, they ought to go after all the pseudo-journalists from the mainstream media who guaranteed that George Zimmerman could not possibly receive a fair trial. Furthermore, even the left agrees that there is absolutely no way whatsoever that this case – having been so exploited by both Obama and the left – is going to end in a conviction. It will be a referendum on guns, on Obama, on what Obama’s son would have looked like, on the stand your ground law, on race, on everything but what it SHOULD have been on.
Any possibility for true justice died in this case the day Barack Obama cynically exploited it: