An article from the Los Angeles Times talks about a former USC “professor of gender and sexuality studies” – AKA a professor of perversion – having sex with boys. Which of course is supposed to identify the pervert as a pedophile.
Oh, he’s a child molester, all right, but let’s take a look at this and you tell me if the description “homosexual” is equally descriptive:
Ex-USC professor pleads guilty to sexually assaulting boys overseas
By Richard Winton, Kate Mather
▼Ex-USC prof on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted list pleaded guilty to having sex with minors overseas
▼Former USC professor admits to having sex with boys on overseas trips to Southeast Asia
▼Former USC professor of gender studies guilty of having sex with boys overseas; gave child porn to archives
September 5, 2014, 5:53 PM
A former USC professor once on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted fugitives list pleaded guilty Friday to flying to the Philippines and sexually assaulting underage boys he groomed online.
Walter Lee Williams, 65, admitted engaging in illegal sexual contact with minors in foreign places, entering the plea during a brief appearance before U.S. District Judge Phillip S. Gutierrez.
As part of a plea, federal prosecutors agreed to recommend that the onetime eminent professor of gender and sexuality studies serve no more than five years in a federal prison. He also would be subject to 10 years supervision upon release and must pay $25,000 in restitution to his seven victims. Williams will be sentenced Dec. 15.
He was apprehended within a day of making the FBI’s Most Wanted List in June 2013 after he was indicted on sex crimes involving two 14-year-old boys in the Philippines. He was captured in the Mexican coastal town of Playa del Carmen after a resident recognized his photo from a newspaper.
Los Angeles Police Department Deputy Chief Michel Moore said Williams’ conduct came to light three years ago when a person concerned about the safety of children contacted authorities.
Williams taught anthropology, gender studies and history at USC for about two decades until he quit in 2011. Under the guise of academic research on sexuality in the Southeast Asia/Pacific region, he repeatedly traveled to the area.
Federal prosecutors alleged that the author and Fulbright Award winner used those trips to sexually assault underage boys. Investigators believe he has at least 10 victims across Southeast Asia, aged 9 to 17.
Williams engaged in webcam sex sessions with two boys, aged 13 and 14, in the Philippines in 2010. The next year, he traveled to the country and sexually assaulted both boys and a 15-year-old boy, according to the plea agreement. He was 62 at the time.
While there, he also had sexual contact with three other 16-year-old boys, records show.
When he returned to Los Angeles International Airport on Feb. 11, 2011, he was “intercepted,” and child pornography was found on him. The professor fled Los Angeles a week after being interviewed by the FBI.
An attorney for USC last year provided the FBI with materials the professor donated to the ONE National Gay and Lesbian Archives that contained “lascivious visual depictions of minors,” according to the plea agreement. FBI agents also obtained similar images from Williams’ former home.
Recognition for Williams’ work included the USC General Education Outstanding Teacher Award in 2006.
I don’t know what YOU were doing when you were 17 years old, but I was serving in the United States Army. In the infantry. I’d already completed basic training, advanced infantry training, and airborne training before turning 18, in fact. My parents signed off on a form stating that I was an adult capable of making a very adult decision. And I made that decision to serve.
And again, I don’t know about you, but I wasn’t a “boy”; I was a MAN, serving his nation, physically trained and morally prepared to fight and die for it.
Throughout most of human history, people have married at FAR YOUNGER AGES than what we are doing today. It was not at ALL uncommon for fifteen year old girls to already be wives and mothers. For example:
In Ancient Rome, it was very common for girls to marry and have children shortly after the onset of puberty. Roman law required brides to be at least 12 years old.
And you can just go to any damn high school and look at the “girls” and at the “boys” and see with your own stupid sheople eyes that these are young ADULTS. With all their sexual natures already on all-too graphic display.
I mean come on, it may very well be beyond “inappropriate” for a man to have sex with one of these young adults who are young enough to be his GRAND KIDS – especially in today’s age where you’re still deemed a “child” by Obama when you’re twenty-damn-six years-old – but it is hardly as if these young adults are some kind of a different species or somehow do not have all of the same sexual equipment that any ADULT male or female has. It is not as if 17-year-old “underage children” constitute a different sexual gender than legal eighteen-year-olds.
We just crossed another major Rubicon in the age of Obama: more than HALF of all adults in America aren’t married, up from 37% in 1976. Now, there’s a couple of different reasons for that, such as that the left has “progressively” redefined “marriage” such that it is a blasphemous perversion of what the God who ordained it says it is – and why even bother getting married when “marriage” is nothing more than a trivial societal convention rather than something that God ordained and made sacred? But the other major reason that we’re no longer marrying or marrying at increasingly older ages is that the big labor unions have so destroyed the education system that a boy and girl who used to be ready to tackle the world as teens are now STILL not ready to tackle the world when they’re in their late 20s and beyond. I mean, mid-thirties is the new eleven these days. And we can’t have these 35-year old violating Roman tradition and getting married when they’re emotionally and intellectually only eleven, can we?
There is no question that it ought to be a crime for a grown-up adult to have any kind of sexual intercourse with a minor, given these times. Young people have not yet formed their identity and the devastation is beyond terrible for young people who have sexual intercourse too early outside of the bonds of sacred marriage – you know, as the BIBLE says and as Christians who are for abstinence keep pointing out. Casual sex is destructive for anyone at ANY age, for what it’s worth, as anyone who has any wisdom knows. But it’s far beyond “naïve” to suggest that these young adults are “genderless children” and that a man having sexual relations with one is a “pedophile” as opposed to being either a hetero- or homosexual PERVERT. It is simply dishonest to the point of being obscene. To suggest that a 17-year-old YOUNG MAN is no freaking biologically different from a six-month-old is beyond idiotic and beyond irrational.
By creating the category of “pedophile” you are creating some kind of disease the way we’ve turned alcoholism into a disease when it used to be a MORAL problem that people were RESPONSIBE for not being able to control back in the day when we had this thing called “morality and common decency.” And back in the day before we had sky-high rates of this perverted garbage.
You people who say this pervert is a “pedophile” because he’s having sex with “underage boys” versus “men” are sick and depraved and frankly insane.
But you DO IT ANYWAY because your sick and twisted liberal ideology compels you to do so.
This “homosexual-no-no-no-it’s-just-pedophilia” bait and switch goes on all the damn time.
The left played this game with the infamous “Pedophile Priests.” In actual fact, 80% of the “boys” molested were teenage boys rather than prepubescent kids:
Second, 80% of all priests who in fact abuse minors have sexually engaged with adolescent boys not prepubescent children. Thus, the teenager is more at risk than the young alter boy or girls of any age.
Do you know why these “pedophile priests” became “pedophile priests” rather than what they actually WERE – HOMOSEXUALS? Because the left wanted it that way and because they twist facts and bend them into whatever conclusion they want, is why.
Let’s consider the FACTS about the Catholic priesthood and the rampant number of homosexuals who have increasingly come to dominate it:
Father Donald Cozzens wrote that several studies have concluded that about 50% of priests and seminarians are gay. 5 David France of Newsweek, referring to St. John’s Seminary in Camarillo, CA, wrote: “Depending on whom you ask, gay and bisexual men make up anywhere from 30 percent to 70 percent of the student body at the college and graduate levels.” 3 Rt. Rev. Helmut Hefner, rector of St. Johns Seminary “accepts that his gay enrollment may be as high as 50 percent.” 3 Gay journalist Rex Wockner commented: “When I was in the Catholic seminary in my early 20s (St. Meinrad College, St. Meinrad, Ind., 1982-1983; University of St. Mary of the Lake, Mundelein, Ill., 1983-1984), at least 50 percent of the students were gay….At St. Mary of the Lake, the straight students felt like a minority and felt excluded from some aspects of campus life to such an extent that the administration staged a seminar at which we discussed the problem of the straight students feeling left out of things…” 6 Author and sociologist James G. Wolfe estimated that 55.1% of seminarians were gay. 7 Bishop Jerome Listecki is an auxiliary bishop of Chicago, rejects some estimates that as many as 50% of seminarians have a homosexual orientation. 3
An anonymous priest from the Boston area commented in an interview with Joe Fitzgerald of the Boston Herald: “there’s a subculture of gay priests and everyone knows it. I went through seminary with a lot of them and got hit on. And when I reported it, I was harassed to a point where, emotionally, it was very difficult to get ordained. I’m not the only one who had to fight to get through it; I know guys who left because of it. It was clear there was a cabal tacitly saying, ‘Don’t bother reporting this stuff.’ You wouldn’t believe the self-justifications, like, ‘Well, celibacy only applies to not getting married, so since we’re not getting married we can do whatever we want.’ It was horrible, with a lot of intimidation, but I stayed because I felt this was what God was calling me to do; besides, if I’d walked, they’d have won.” 8 Father McBrien, a theologian at the University of Notre Dame, commented that some seminary students “…who feel they have a genuine vocation for priesthood go into a seminary and feel very alienated by the gay culture. I don’t say this in any homophobic sense. It’s just the reality.” 2 Pope John Paul II held a meeting with the American cardinals which dealt with the clerical sex scandals. Afterward, Bishop Wilton Gregory, head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said: “One of the difficulties we do face in seminary life or recruitment is made possible when there does exist a homosexual atmosphere or dynamic that makes heterosexual men think twice [about entering.] It is an ongoing struggle to make sure the Catholic priesthood is not dominated by homosexual men.” 9 R. Scott Appleby, a history professor at Notre Dame, said: “People I know quite well have left the seminary either in disgust because people are not keeping vows, or in alienation because they’re not gay. In some cases it’s a serious problem.” 3 The Most Rev. Wilton Gregory said: “[T]here does exist a homosexual atmosphere or dynamic that makes heterosexual men think twice.” 3 The Rev. Charles Bouchard, president of the Aquinas Institute of Theology in St. Louis said: “I think straight priests and seminarians shouldn’t be whining. I just don’t think it’s a big deal.” 3 Father Donald Cozzens wrote: “What impact does the gay subcultrue have on the straight priest and seminarian?….straight men in a predominantly or significantly gay environment commonly experience chronic destabilization, a common symptom of which is self doubt…Their psychic confusion, understandably, has significant implications for both their spiritual vitality and emotional balance.” 10 Timothy Radcliffe, Master of the Order of Preachers, commented on the emergence of a homosexual sub-culture within a seminary or religious order: “It can threaten the unity of the community; it can make it harder for the brethren to practice the chastity which we have vowed. It can put pressure on brethren to think of themselves in a way that is not central to their vocation as preachers of the Kingdom…” 11
You can go to the site to view the source of each of these footnoted points.
If you are a “professor” clinging to that lie, you are as dishonest as “Professor Williams,” you are nearly as depraved as “Professor Williams,” and you ought to have your damn credentials stripped from you as a moron.
It wasn’t all that long ago that I was reading my local newspaper and a “wildlife expert” said not to kill rattlesnakes because they would only reproduce more and you’d end up with more of them. And I was like, “Really? You’re expert is THAT stupid?” You’ve got to understand that I live in a state that has a grizzly bear on its state flag when there are NO grizzly bears in the state any more: BECAUSE WE HUNTED THEM TO EXTINCTION HERE.
If you kill a rattlesnake, one of the things that rattlesnake won’t do anymore is reproduce. And it’s not like the rest of the rattlesnakes have a conference and determine that they need to each reproduce a little bit more to pick up the slack for poor dead Ronald the Rattlesnake. And so all the rattlesnakes at the Great RepFab agree to have more babies for Ronnie’s sake.
At the time, I merely dismissed it as idiotic. But it later came to me that this expert wasn’t stupid; what he was was dishonest. He was trying to use his influence as an “expert” to manipulate people into behavior that he wanted as a philosophical environmentalist: don’t hurt rattlesnakes; you should just let them hurt YOU instead.
And of course at the same time, other “experts” are having it both ways. Because at the same time one expert is suggesting not to kill rattlesnakes lest they increase their breeding rate, others are out there helping to impose incredibly draconian regulations on
It’s no coincidence that so many professors are leftists, because this is intellectual Stalinism: they think they ought to get to have everything not only both ways, but in as many ways as they want it. And if their ways contradict each other, if their theories are contradicted by the facts, well so much the worse for the facts.
As an example of the left having it both ways, consider the fact that when it comes to “pedophilia,” the victims under 18 are “children.” But when it comes to justifying ABORTION, these young girls are as adult as anybody else and have all the adult rights of access to abortion so they can make the adult decision to kill their own babies rather than have to as children have their parents’ consent. The left ALWAYS must have it BOTH WAYS or else it would crumble for the intellectually and morally vacuous cancer upon society that leftism is.
You want another blatant example of the left having it both ways? Take feminist women. Women are every bit as capable as men, they tell us. Women ought to be cops and firefighters and serve in combat and be Navy SEALs. But then Ray Rice shows us what happens when a man and a woman actually fight and it’s lights out for the woman. And now the same woman who can do EVERYTHING a man can do is a helpless victim against domestic violence. Because the left is the nexus where mutually exclusive realities converge into one massive contradiction. [My own view, fwiw, is that women CAN'T do everything men can do - and vice versa - and that when men batter women it is intrinsically an unfair fight and men ought to be held accountable for that abuse the same way adults ought to be held accountable for beating children. But then again, I'm something called "consistent" which no liberal can ever possibly understand].
And so just like our “pedophile” – and please make that HOMOSEXUAL – Professor Williams, we have a massive overrepresentation of homosexual priests who acted out on their HOMOSEXUALITY. Period.
According to the American Psychiatric Association, until 1974 homosexuality was a mental illness. Freud had alluded to homosexuality numerous times in his writings, and had concluded that paranoia and homosexuality were inseparable. Other psychiatrists wrote copiously on the subject, and homosexuality was “treated” on a wide basis. There was little or no suggestion within the psychiatric community that homosexuality might be conceptualized as anything other than a mental illness that needed to be treated. And, of course, homosexuality was listed as a mental illness in DSM-II.
Then in 1970 gay activists protested against the APA convention in San Francisco. These scenes were repeated in 1971, and as people came out of the “closet” and felt empowered politically and socially, the APA directorate became increasingly uncomfortable with their stance. In 1973 the APA’s nomenclature task force recommended that homosexuality be declared normal. The trustees were not prepared to go that far, but they did vote to remove homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses by a vote of 13 to 0, with 2 abstentions. This decision was confirmed by a vote of the APA membership, and homosexuality was no longer listed in the seventh edition of DSM-II, which was issued in 1974.
What’s noteworthy about this is that the removal of homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses was not triggered by some scientific breakthrough. There was no new fact or set of facts that stimulated this major change. Rather, it was the simple reality that gay people started to kick up a fuss. They gained a voice and began to make themselves heard. And the APA reacted with truly astonishing speed. And with good reason. They realized intuitively that a protracted battle would have drawn increasing attention to the spurious nature of their entire taxonomy. So they quickly “cut loose” the gay community and forestalled any radical scrutiny of the DSM system generally.
You want to be declared mentally healthy? Just RIOT enough and then watch the moral and intellectual cowards declare you to be whatever you want to be declared.
Given the FACT that homosexuals constitute no more than 2% of the population, and given the whopping number of “child molestation” cases, to properly link the two together as the facts actually DEMAND is to point such a whopping finger of indictment at homosexuals that their predatory danger to the soul of the nation would be manifest. And that would in the same way indict all these damn “experts” who said all these twisted people were fine, wouldn’t it?
Can’t have that, obviously. No matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
In so many ways it is beyond unreal, homosexuality is dangerous to America and to our moral fabric as a society.
But the truth is suppressed in unrighteousness, as Romans 1:18 – which begins the outcry against homosexuality – points out. And they lie with their statistics and their theories and their pronouncements.
The Bible is as clear as it can be in its condemnation of the danger of the homosexualization of society as has HAPPENED in our society. Just read Romans 1:18-32 for that.
If you’re a liberal, you’ve made your choice to completely disregard the teachings and warnings of Scripture. You have radically rejected God and as a result one day soon He will radically reject YOU to the hell He prepared for the devil and his demons. But if you’re NOT yet submitted to worshiping depraved culture rather than God, consider reality. Realize that most of what’s being pumped into culture today – whether in the name of “art” or “politics” or “academia” or “science” – is demonic garbage from people who have “exchanged the truth of God for a lie” (Romans 1:25). These are people who have had their minds blinded by the god of this age (2 Corinthians 4:4) so that they are “always learning, but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth” (2 Timothy 3:7).
President Barack Obama and the Democrat Party have defiantly led America to the full wrath of God according to Romans chapter one. To the extent that we yet have time, if it is not too late, you had better make your stand right now and determine to either stand with Christ or stand with the coming Antichrist who will complete the Democrat Party agenda in its radical and terrifying opposition to God.