Two things come out of this radio interview of Gloria Allred by Mark Levin:
1) The peculiar form of mental retardation that is endemic in even the most brilliant liberals. Listen to Gloria Allred repeatedly use every form of rhetorical jujitsu in order to make herself some kind of offended victim instead of just answering the damn question. It is simply amazing, and frankly demented, how a liberal can go on a program and talk and talk and talk all the while complaining that she isn’t being allowed to talk.
Add to that the fact that Gloria Allred bizarrely becomes self-righteously indignant and refuses to use the term “illegal alien” even though Mark Levin spoke as a lawyer himself and was using “illegal alien” as a recognized legal term, which any lawyer worth cat feces would recognize.
2) The fact that Gloria Allred deliberately put this woman, who is, yes, AN ILLEGAL ALIEN, in direct legal jeopardy just so that Gloria Allred can pursue an ideological vendetta against a candidate for governor.
Now, two things should happen.
1) Gloria Allred’s client should be criminally prosecuted because of her fraudulent criminal falsification of documents in order to illegally obtain a job. Then, after serving time in jail, she should be deported as a criminal illegal alien. And why should these things happen? Because Gloria Allred revealed the criminal activities of her client just to political attack a Republican candidate for governor. Had Gloria Allred NOT revealed the criminal activities of her client, her client would have been able to get another $23-an-hour housekeeping position.
2) Gloria Allred should be disbarred for exploiting a client rather than representing that client’s best legal interest. As attorney Mark Levin points out:
“When you represent a client, you have to make sure you are not exposing that client in other ways. So I’m asking you: are you aware that your client forged or falsified a Social Security document? Yes or no.” Levin goes on to say, “I am accusing you of putting your client in legal jeopardy. How do you respond?”
Gloria Allred “responds” by saying, “You know, even though my client is a housekeeper, and some people don’t respect a housekeeper, I happen to respect housekeepers.”
At this point, Levin impatiently says: “Aren’t you swell. Now answer my question.”
Gloria Allred stupidly says, “I’m answering your question” [which she clearly isn't].
Levin now explodes:
“You put your client in legal jeopardy! I don’t need a lecture from a liberal about housekeepers! I asked you about your client, and the legal jeopardy that your client is in now.”
And Allred proceeds to go on yet another morally insane lecture in which she self-righteously presents herself as standing up for the truth, and how Mark Levin – who is practically screaming for Gloria Allred to stop grandstanding and provide the facts – is afraid of the facts. She mentions that her client – who was paid an incredible $23 an hour to do a menial job – was not reimbursed for all of her travel expenses.
Levin asks, “So you are aware that she falsified and forged a Social Security document.”
Allred pathetically says, “You want to attack a housekeeper. You don’t want to deal with…”
Levin interrupts the – excuse my language – lower-lip-high bullshit. And says:
“No, no. I want to deal with YOU. I want to deal with you as a fellow member of the Bar. My question: 42 United States Code 408A18. It’s a federal felony to forge or falsify a Social Security document. And you’re telling me that your client came forward and said, “Okay. Expose me to possible deportation. Expose me to up to five years in prison, I want my travel money?”
And Allred again self-righteously and pompously states that she would never tell anyone the conversation she had with her client. Because it’s attorney-client privilege. Which Gloria Allred apparently interprets as being allowed to destroy her client’s life at will and use her client’s destruction to advance liberal political partisan politics.
“It is absurd for you to say that you filed a complaint because she didn’t get reimbursed for her travel or what have you. Yesterday, as a matter of fact, you filed it. And you and the immigration attorney have exposed your client in my humble opinion to very, very serious matters which could cost her her liberty. And your answer is that I don’t like housekeepers! It’s you who apparently don’t like housekeepers.”
Gloria Allred repeatedly states that Mark Levin is afraid of the facts, and doesn’t want to deal with the facts – even though Levin is determined to get to them, and even though Allred is equally determined to whine about anything and everything BUT the facts.
And Gloria Allred refuses to disclose whether she is being paid by a third party – say, for example, the Jerry Brown for Governor campaign.
And what are the facts? Other than the fact that Gloria Allred would be willing to watch her client get tortured and then burned alive if her screams and her ashes would help keep a Republican from being elected governor?
Meg Whitman relied on an employment agency that guaranteed to her that the housekeeper they sent was in the country legally. She has a copy of Nicandra Diaz Santillan’s Social Security card and her California Driver’s license – which both indicate that Santillan was a legal resident.
In other words, it wasn’t that Whitman didn’t bother to check her housekeeper’s legal status: it was that she CLEARLY DID CHECK HER HOUSEKEEPER’S LEGAL STATUS, and an examination of the official state documentation provided by Santillan showed that Santillan was in fact legal.
So who is the criminal here? It most certainly was not Meg Whitman; it was CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIEN Nicandra Diaz Santillan. It was Santillan who committed felonies by using fraud to criminally obtain official government documents.
In exposing these facts about her client, Gloria Allred is all but guaranteeing that said client will be criminally prosecuted for multiple felonies, and then deported as a CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIEN.
And why does Gloria Allred destroy her client’s future? Because she thought she had a “gotcha” document in the form of a letter sent by the Social Security Administration. The letter was allegedly signed by gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman’s husband (Dr. Griffith Harsh), who had written on the letter, “Nicky (i.e., ILLEGAL ALIEN Nicandra Diaz Santillan who had criminally falsified her documents to get the job in the Whitman household), please look into this.” And given the letter to the ILLEGAL ALIEN housekeeper. And, of course, “Nicky” (did I mention she’s a criminal illegal alien) sat on the letter. Until giving it to Gloria Allred.
Now, why does Meg Whitman’s husband write, “Nicky, please look into this”? Because he was duped by a criminal. He had no idea that this housekeeper had criminally falsified documents including a bogus Social Security Number in order to get the job which she had held for three years prior to the letter.
The letter, which Gloria Allred says proves that Meg Whitman knew she was employing an ILLEGAL ALIEN, in fact only proves that Meg Whitman’s HUSBAND (i.e. NOT Meg Whitman) was in fact ignorant that “Nicky” was an ILLEGAL ALIEN. There is absolutely no evidence that Meg Whitman had ever seen the letter, or that her husband had informed her about it.
Which is to say husband Dr. Griffith Harsh assumed it was a minor paperwork issue BECAUSE HE TRUSTED A CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIEN WHO HAD SWINDLED THE COUPLE.
“While I honestly do not recall receiving this letter as it was sent to me seven years ago, I can say it is possible that I would’ve scratched a follow up note on a letter like this, which is a request for information to make certain Nicky received her Social Security benefits and W-2 tax refund for withheld wages,” he said. “Since we believed her to be legal, I would have had no reason to suspect that she would not have filled it in and done what was needed to secure her benefits.’‘
Harsh also wrote: “The essential fact remains the same, neither Meg nor I believed there was a problem with Nicky’s legal status and I certainly don’t recall ever discussing it with my wife, nor did I ever show her any letter about it. The facts of this matter are very clear: Ms. Diaz broke the law and lied to us and to the employment agency. When she confessed her deception to us last year, we ended her employment immediately.”
So much for the “smoking gun.” It actually proves that the Dr. Harsh and Meg Whitman did NOT know that their housekeeper was in fact an ILLEGAL ALIEN.
Apparently, the heart of Gloria Allred’s case is that Meg Whitman should have known that all Hispanics are liars and criminals. And even if a Hispanic has come from a legitimate employment agency, and even if that Hispanic has documents, that Meg Whitman should have realized that simply to be Hispanic is to be both a liar and a criminal.
So everyone should immediately fire any Hispanic under employment. Because having documents means nothing. You know that “those kind” will criminally produce fraudulent documents and then lie about it.
Liberals don’t give a leaping damn about Hispanics. They would destroy them in a heartbeat if they voted Republican. Just as Gloria Allred will destroy Nicandra Diaz Santillan in order to illegitimately demonize Meg Whitman.
And, as I’ve said over and over again, the quintessential element of a liberal is massive hypocrisy. The same liberals who have done everything they can to cynically aggrandize themselves to criminal illegal aliens – including making it impossible to verify their illegal status – are now trying to crucify a Republican political candidate for not being able to do what liberals have spent years trying to keep them from doing. All the while condemning as racist anyone even trying to do it to begin with.
I will always wonder how liberals’ heads don’t simply explode from trying to contain all the massive contradictions.
As a final note, if the media were even remotely fair in its coverage of this Glorai Allred political stunt, they would be asking the other gubernatorial candidate a question: given that Jerry Brown is the California Attorney General, why hasn’t he arrested Nicandra Diaz Santillan?