When Obama wants dirty work done, he turns to someone he can later discard like just another used condom after the nastiest of nasty acts of gay sex.
Top Gay Blogger John Aravosis: Obama Campaign Asked Me to Do ‘Dirty Work’ in 2008, and I Did
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 | Kristinn
Leading gay blogger John Aravosis, writing today at his Americablog about White House spokesman Robert Gibbs attacking inside the beltway progressive critics of Barack Obama, like Aravosis, let slip that he performed surreptitious “dirty work” for Obama at the behest of his 2008 presidential campaign:
Joe and I are upset with Obama, and we, for example, raised nearly $43,000 for the man, According to the White House, our money now doesn’t count. Great, would they like to give it back? I for one, would love the $1000 back that I personally donated to the Obama campaign. Joe gave even more. I suspect a lot of our readers wouldn’t mind their contributions back too, since apparently they’re not appreciated.
Then there’s all that work we did for the campaign, all the dirty work they asked us to do – and we did it, gladly, and quietly – none of that counted either, apparently.
Presumably, the “Joe” who Aravosis mentions his Americablog’s deputy editor Joe Sudbay.
Aravosis does not detail the “dirty work” he and “Joe” did for the Obama campaign, however he has earned a reputation for despicable, life destroying behavior against political opponents.
Aravosis gained prominence earlier this decade for outing closeted homosexuals who did not follow the liberal homosexual agenda.
Act like a tool, get used like a fool.
Here’s the story that is posted on the last link above that might exemplify the “dirty work” Aravosis performed at Obama’s request:
March 29, 2005
The Gay-Outing Terrorists of the Left: The ‘Gayjahidiin’
The tactics used by John Aravosis (Americablog) and Michael Rogers (BlogActive-Raw Story) have become more and more disgusting with time. Recently, we noted in a series of posts that the two have teamed up to ‘out’ Republican National Committee Chair, Ken Mehlman.
Now, the pair have sunk to an even lower low–if that is possible to imagine. Gay Patriot likened the two to ‘terrorists’. What did it get the anonymous gay-blogger? According to Outlet Radio:
According to GayPatriot, who is also a client of mine, Michael Rogers called GayPatriot’s place of employment on Friday immediately following the post above and spoke to GayPatriot’s secretary and boss. GayPatriot had no idea Rogers would go to such measures and shared with me that both he and his secretary were very upset by the calls but that his boss was understanding.
Rogers excuse for calling Gay Patriot’s boss?
Rogers expressed feeling threatened by the post and compared it to posts by anti-abortionists who posted the names of doctors performing them.
That is how threatening people behave, not those that feel threatened.
As Rob at Say Anything puts it:
They’re telling us, with their actions, that if you’re gay in this country you can not support the Republican party or any aspect of the political right and if you do support that sort of thing you will be persecuted.
He also points me to Lime Sherbert who was appparently also a victim of the gayjahidin
Jay Tea over at Wizbang adds:
So, let’s sum things up: the attitude of conservatives towards gays is “do whatever the hell you want, just keep it in private. And no, you aren’t getting married, so forget about that.” The liberals say “we’re all for you, we’ll give you whatever you want, just so long as you do exactly as we say. Otherwise, we’ll fry your faggot asses — and not in a way you’ll like.”
The left keeps using that word tolerance. I do not think that word means what they think it means.
A couple of things. One: I’m not out to defend homosexuality. Two: I’m not out to personally destroy them as human beings, either. Even the ones with whom I most disagree.
The activities of these liberal homosexuals to personally destroy conservative (or at least Republican) homosexuals is similar to an earlier effort that slimebag liberal gay activists unleashed against Prop 8 donors.
This kind of crap goes right to the heart of why the phrase “liberal fascism” is so legitimate. And the term “Gayjahidiin” is accurate.
Apparently liberal gay activist John Aravosis screwed and hurt fellow gays to advance the Obamafuhrer agenda, and now he’s upset that they won’t give him the correct time of day. Poor, poor thug.
Aravosis and the many liberal gay activists like him are more than thugs; they are hard-core fascists who routinely shout-down those with whom they disagree even as they themselves demand that they be heard.
I’m kind of reminded of this happening once before: In the events previous to and during “The Night of the Long Knives” during Hitler’s Nazi’s regime.
Many homosexuals have pointed out that Hitler persecuted homosexuals, and that they were actually victims of Nazism. And this is true. But they didn’t start out as victims; they started out as tools of Nazism. Nazis themselves, who oppressed and persecuted others. And then when their usefulness was over, Hitler eliminated them.
This was the same as Hitler’s use of avant-garde art prior to his persecution of avant-garde artists. While Nazism was rising to power, it was revolutionary, and it permitted and even encouraged other revolutionists to serve the cause of Nazism. But after taking total control, Nazism – revolutionary as it had been during its rise – became the new regime. And the totalitarian regime would tolerate no rivals, and no other voices. Thus the once revolutionary Nazis became profoundly anti-revolutionary.
And it was exactly the same with the communists. They were very encouraging of expressions against the established order when they were trying to bring down the established order. But once they were in power, they persecuted every voice that wasn’t exactly the same as their own.
The problem with Ernst Rohm and the SA weren’t that they weren’t “Nazi” enough; the problem was that they were too radical for Hitler’s political position as he tried to consolidate his power. They were TOO Nazi, too unwilling to yield to Hitler’s toned-down rhetoric as he tried to reach other groups. As an example, they wanted to kill all the Jews before Hitler was ready to kill all the Jews.
This is why we have the phrase “Useful idiots.” And why it was a Stalin who coined it for us.
Like Hitler and like Stalin, Barack Obama was willing to use and encourage homosexuals to slavishly work for him and assist him in his rise to power. But now it’s HIS regime, and he doesn’t want to do anything that will in any way undercut his regime.
And thus we have our own version of the SA today, and our own version of Ernst Rohm in John Aravosis. Obama found homosexual thugs like John Aravosis to persecute and oppress others. Eventually he will find other thugs to identify, isolate, freeze and escalate marginalizing actions upon the John Aravosises of the world. Only Obama is too big to fail, on Obama’s view of the world.
One way or another, these slime who deliberately hunt down and harm others to advance their radical political agenda will ultimately get theirs.