Posts Tagged ‘Trayvon Martin’

As We Survey The Race-Baiting Disaster In Furgusen, MO Caused By Liberals, Remember That The Democrat Party Is THE Party of Evil In America

August 15, 2014

Okay, we’ve got a beef, folks.  So let’s riot and burn down the community and throw Molotov cocktails and get violent and nasty and rabid.

Oh, wait.  What’s that?  Oh, you’re right; we’re NOT liberals.  Which is another way of saying we’re not race-baiting rabid fascists.  So we can’t do that because we’re conservatives.

I remember the frenzied furor that the mainstream media erupted into when that rancher in Texas had Obama and his lawthug Eric Holder in his face and tea partiers started showing up with their rifles to make sure the government acted right.  You know, after Obama’s BLM thugs did crap like THIS.

Who actually fired the gunshots?  None were fired during the Bundy standoff.  But plenty were fired BY LIBERALS in Ferguson.

Nobody was shot.  Oh, except for the cattle who were callously and thuggishly massacred by Obama’s BLM goons.  As best I can remember there were no riots.  There was no looting.  I don’t think the tea partiers threw so much as ONE Molotov cocktail.  No towns burned down.

But the way the fascist propaganda mill covered it, you’d have thought the tea partiers had brought thousands of babies to have mass human sacrifices to their Nazi gods or something.

Of course, the same truth-despising fascist media propaganda tactic was employed against the Tea Party when they were peacefully protesting and the blanket of silence surrounding the vicious, rabidly fascist leftist Occupy Movement defied belief.

Remember how the Tea Party was described as being so WHITE and by implication so RACIST by the leftist media propaganda?  It of course subsequently didn’t matter whatsoever that the beloved Occupy Movement was EVERY BIT as white if not MORE so.

7,775 documented arrests of liberals.  Versus ZERO of conservatives.  But the way the most dishonest propaganda machine since Joseph Goebbels and his Nazi Ministry of Propaganda depicted it, it was the conservatives with their zero arrests who were the side of naked evil.

What is interesting is when you actually consider our murders and our mass shootings, and you consider that the black people and young people who are the backbone of the Democrat Party vote machine are responsible for virtually all the damn crimes and murders in America, this is nothing new.  Which is why liberals refuse to consider the actual facts.

We’ve seen non-stop race-rioting, burning and looting for DAYS in Ferguson, Missouri, and of course its the good guys’ fault because how DARE they try to maintain law and order when secular humanist statist fascists want to riot and burn and loot in the name of “justice”???

But now the details are starting to come out.

We learn that the poor, helpless little boy who was gunned down when he hadn’t even done anything wrong.  And he was even shot in the back, we were told on MSNBC.  Now we know a little bit more about him, too:

A suburban St. Louis police chief on Friday identified the officer whose fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager ignited days of heated protests, and released documents alleging the teen was killed after a robbery in which he was suspected of stealing a $48.99 box of cigars.

Ferguson, Mo., Police Chief Thomas Jackson said that the robbery took place just before noon on Saturday at a nearby convenience store roughly 10 minutes before a police officer identified as Darren Wilson fired the bullet that killed Michael Brown. Police say that the shot was fired after a struggle touched off by Wilson’s confronting Brown. Jackson said Wilson is a six-year veteran with no disciplinary action on his record.

The news conference came after nearly a week of sometimes-violent protests and calls by many, including President Obama, for local law enforcement to be more transparent about the circumstances surrounding the shooting. Police previously said they withheld Wilson’s identity because of the potential for threats on the officer and his family. The officer has been on administrative leave since the shooting.

Police released still images and were planning to release video from the robbery, at a QuikTrip store in Ferguson. Jackson said Wilson, along with other officers, were called to the area after a 911 call reporting a “strong-arm robbery” at a nearby convenience store. He didn’t immediately release details about the alleged robbery, saying more information would be released later.

Jackson provided few other details about Wilson at the news conference and did not take any questions. Jackson said Swisher Sweets cigars were stolen in the robbery. He was suspected of stealing the box of cigars. The documents released by authorities include surveillance images from the store.

According to the police reports, Brown and his friend, Dorian Johnson, were suspected of taking a box of cigars from a store in Ferguson that morning.

“I am incensed,” Laura Keys, 50, told The St. Louis Post-Dispatch. “I can’t believe this is the tactic they are using, bringing up a robbery to make the victim look like he was the person who created this whole mess.”

Police have said Brown was shot after an officer encountered him and another man on the street. They say one of the men pushed the officer into his squad car, then physically assaulted him in the vehicle and struggled with the officer over the officer’s weapon. At least one shot was fired inside the car before the struggle spilled onto the street, where Brown was shot multiple times, according to police.

But a much different story has been told by Dorian Johnson, who says he was walking down the street with Brown when he was shot. He has said the officer ordered them out of the street, then grabbed his friend’s neck and tried to pull him into the car before brandishing his weapon and firing. He says Brown started to run and the officer pursued him, firing multiple times.

We know that Michael Brown – this poor, helpless little teenage victim – was in reality a 6’4″ 290 lb brutal THUG who strong armed robbed a store after physically assaulting the owner.

So we had the liberal Democrat account of a brutal police officer just randomly harassing and then murdering a poor innocent black kid just for being black.  And then we have the actual fact that the cop who came upon these two thugs was responding to a suspect who had just committed a STRONG ARM ROBBERY that had just taken place.  And then these two hoodlum gangsta thugs attacked him.

At this point details get murky.  This above news report was based on the police chief’s earlier report that the officer in the shooting was responding to the strong arm robbery.  The chief has since clarified that Officer Wilson was not aware of the robbery and actually was stopping them for walking in the middle of the road when the attack on the officer and the subsequent shooting by the officer occurred.

This latter actually makes more sense; because if the officer was responding to a strong arm robbery suspect, he would have immediately held Brown at gunpoint as opposed to allowing him to get close enough to attack him.  The cop was unaware of the fact that Brown had just committed a strong arm robbery, but Brown certainly wasn’t unaware.  Which is why he attacked the officer the first chance he had.

If there’s any question as to whether Brown is a thug, why don’t we ask that owner how helpless this poor little 6’4″ 290 pound black boy was???

And we know that the police officer who confronted and shot Brown was physically injured in the death struggle that Brown initiated as the officer found himself shoved backward into his own squad car and struggling for possession of his weapon.

But here’s the thing: Democrats are THUGS who LOVE THUGS.  So whose side do they take?  Well, after demonizing as some kind of racist cop a guy who turns out to be an impeccable police officer, and after lionizing the poor little boy who turns out to be a violent thug, liberals being liberals and therefore THUGS believe Michael Brown’s thug buddy.

And that is because liberals are EVIL people who routinely side with evil thugs time after time.

This is getting tiring.

This is now the third time Turd Obama has jumped in to side with evil in race-baiting incidents.

I think of Obama stupidly getting on national television – after admitting he was personally ignorant – and accusing the police that responded to the call in Massachusetts that “the police acted stupidly.”

Do you remember that?

Who ‘Acted Stupidly’? The Cop, The Professor, Or The President?

911 Caller In Gates Case Gets Death Threats As ‘Racist': But Who Are The REAL Racists?

The only two people who truly acted “stupidly” was Henry Louis Gates – who erupted in racist rage when most people would have been glad that a police officer had showed up to investigate a report that someone was trying to break into their home – and one Barack Hussein Obama.

All the poor cop knew – and again, this was an EXEMPLARY cop just like our current cop Darren Wilson is an exemplary cop – was that he had received a report about a man breaking into a house.  That’s all the cop knew; someone had called 911 and reported that a man was trying to get into a house late in the night.  And had the black Harvard professor not had a chip on his shoulder about a mile deep, and had he not been a racist, bitter Democrat turd, the matter would have been easily cleared up.

But no, no, no.  Liberals are vicious, bitter, rabid little fascists.  They cannot help themselves.  And the demons are quick to erupt out of these wicked people.  So Professor Henry Louis Gates went – and the only appropriately descriptive term is “apeshit” –  on the poor officer who had no choice but to arrest the man.

Then we had the Trayvon Martin shooting.  And Obama AGAIN dived into it and sicked his lawthug Eric Holder on George Zimmerman.  Because when a black thug is on top of you beating you, how dare you think you have the right to defend yourself???

The Left Goes Batpoop Over George Zimmerman’s ‘God’s Plan’ Remark. My Thoughts On The Subject.

Obama FBI Thinks It’s A ‘Hate Crime’ That George Zimmerman Bloodied Trayvon Martin’s Knuckles With His Broken Nose And Lacerated Head

Mainstream Media Lynching Of George Zimmerman Pretty Much Confirms Everything I’ve Said About Both Liberalism And ‘Journalism’

ABC News Enhances Zimmerman Arrest Video And FINDS ‘A Pair Of Gashes Or Welts On George Zimmerman’s Head’

Obama Dives Into ‘Racist’ Trayvon Martin Shooting Case (Please Try To Remember That ‘Racist’ Shooter George Zimmerman Is Hispanic)

Trayvon Martin, Racism, The Stand Your Ground Law And Michael Dunn. No Comparison Whatsoever.

A trial that never should have GONE to trial completely exonerated George Zimmerman of having done anything wrong that night.  And Eric Holder – who was determined to punish Zimmerman – by the way, a HISPANIC - in whatever kangaroo court he could create, was humiliated again when we subsequently learned there were no civil rights violations, either.  But that of course was just allowed to dwindle away.

FACTS don’t matter to liberals.  That’s what makes them “liberals.”  They literally couldn’t BE liberals if they cared anything about truth.

 

 

 

Trayvon Martin, Racism, The Stand Your Ground Law And Michael Dunn. No Comparison Whatsoever.

February 12, 2014

One can do a search on my blog and see how vigorously I defended George Zimmerman’s right to defend himself against Trayvon Martin.

I was of course called a “racist” by the incredibly racist left for doing so, as someone reading the comments can see.

George Zimmerman was physically attacked.  Only the most rabid ideologue fool refuses to acknowledge that Zimmerman was on his back getting beaten with Trayvon Martin on top of him “MMA style” raining down blows on a man who had already suffered a broken nose and serious abrasions to the back of his skull.

Liberals are fascists who do not want ordinary people to possess the right or capability to defend themselves.  Period.  On top of that, liberals are racist race-baiters who demonize white people and who have no compunction whatsoever to alter reality to make themselves victims.  Thus George Zimmerman became a “white Hispanic” to eradicate the fact that he himself is a racial minority.  And Trayvon Martin became an innocent ten-year old in the news accounts rather than a 6’3″ thug who already had had numerous encounters with the law and who by his own accounts was already glorifying in violence.

The case was a “no-brainer” from the outset.  And liberals proved that they are brainless ideologues who refuse to accept the real world in their steadfast determination that George Zimmerman be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for daring to defend himself rather than placing all his trust that Obama and the State would defend him.  The ONLY reason the case even ever went to trial was because Democrats are rabid fascists.

The Michael Dunn case is entirely different.  And pathologically rabid liberals might be surprised to learn that I am very firmly on the side of the car-full of black kids who got shot rather than on the white man who shot them.

Michael Dunn, unlike Zimmerman’s defense, is citing the “Stand Your Ground Law.”  Again, pathologically dishonest Democrats made the Zimmerman case all about that “Stand Your Ground” law even though Zimmerman’s defense NEVER cited it.  And the reason that Democrats hate that law so much is that, again, they are fascists whose demons inhabiting them start twitching hysterically the moment an ordinary person is deemed to have the right to stand in any way, shape or form or to protect himself in any way, shape or form.  And that is especially true – in the Democrat age of “Never bring a lawsuit against a black” – when race is involved.

George Zimmerman is Hispanic.  Not a “white Hispanic” as the racist, bigoted, socialist and frankly evil New York Times branded him.  Either acknowledge that Zimmerman is Hispanic, you jackals, or for the sake of any kind of honesty whatsoever STOP CALLING OBAMA AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHEN HE IS ONLY HALF AFRICAN-AMERICAN.  But the fact of the matter is that Democrats are hypocrites without any kind of shame, honor, decency, integrity or virtue whatsoever.  So Obama gets to be the first black president and anybody who doesn’t like Obama’s policies is a “racist” by definition while Zimmerman becomes a “white Hispanic” with the sole emphasis on his being “white” and therefore guilty.

But let’s get back to Michael Dunn.

Here’s the basic account of what happened:

Mr. Dunn, a middle-aged white man, allegedly opened fire on a car with four black teenagers in it at a Jacksonville, Fla., gas station. The boys were apparently blasting music, and when Dunn asked them to turn it down, they responded angrily. Dunn has said he felt threatened and thought he saw someone point a gun at him through the back window, so he opened fire. No gun was found in the boys’ car, and none of the witnesses to the altercation noticed a gun.

Here’s another:

The day after last Thanksgiving, Dunn was in good spirits when he attended his son’s wedding at a historic home overlooking the St. Johns River in Orange Park, a quaint Jacksonville suburb.

But after the wedding, Dunn got into a parking lot dispute with teenagers at a gas station that ended with a 17-year-old dead and Dunn charged with murder.

Police portray the South Patrick Shores resident as an out-of-control gunman who became enraged over loud rap music booming from a nearby car, grabbed a 9mm pistol from his glovebox and fired two volleys into a Dodge Durango containing four black teens. The gunshots killed Jordan Davis and narrowly missed two other boys.

Dunn told detectives he acted in self-defense after he heard threats and thought he saw Davis raise the barrel of a shotgun above the SUV’s rear passenger window. No gun was found, police said.

Here’s the thing that makes Michael Dunn guilty:

Asked by detectives why he didn’t report the shooting by calling 911, he said he planned to drive Rouer home to Brevard County in the morning, then confess to authorities.

By 4:25 a.m. the next morning, Jacksonville police had obtained an arrest warrant and contacted the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office, looking for Dunn. A witness at the gas station had reported his license tag number.

He was arrested by deputies at about 10:30 a.m. at his condo, then taken to police headquarters in Viera for a videotaped interview with two Jacksonville detectives.

Wearing a yellow short-sleeved collared shirt and striped shorts, fidgeting and wiping his hands on his knees, Dunn related his side of the story – but neither detective bought his version of events.

Rather, they said details of Dunn’s story didn’t match those at the crime scene. Neither the surviving boys nor independent witnesses at the gas station said Davis had a firearm or tried to exit the SUV – in fact, one of the boys later said Davis couldn’t have exited a rear door because the child locks were engaged.

“If there was a shotgun coming up at you, we would expect you to do what you did. The problem that we have is, there is no shotgun. That’s the bridge that we’ve got to get across,” a detective told Dunn.

“You keep dwelling on this shotgun as if there’s one at the scene. If there was a shotgun, a BB gun, any type of gun at the scene – hell, if there was a water gun that was black that looked real at the scene. …” the detective said.

This case is NOT about race, any more than the George Zimmerman case was ever about race.

Democrats pathologically despise the Constitution or the United States and our founding fathers, unless and until these great men are perverted into deists and atheists in radical abandonment of actual history and unless and until their words are “fundamentally transformed” by liberal judges into a grotesque mockery of anything they ever actually intended their words to mean.  And the words that Democrats hate only slightly less are Martin Luther King, Jr.’s words from his “I have a dream” speech:

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

Democrats hate those words.  They hate the idea that the content of one’s character should matter.  They want it to be exclusively about the color of one’s skin.  And if you are black, you are by definition a “victim” and if you are white, you are by definition a “racist” and a “bigot” and “privileged” and therefore guilty of whatever crime Democrats want to scapegoat you with.

I think of the character in the great movie, “The Ten Commandments” named Nathan.  Because he is the epitome of the Democrat Party.  Like Nathan, DEMOCRATS are the real party of slavery.  Democrats literally fought the damned Civil War to keep slavery while Republicans fought to liberate the slaves.  The Ku Klux Klan that rode like a living cancer after that Democrat War constituted the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party who persecuted blacks and white Republicans while their fellow Democrats undid everything Republican president Abraham Lincoln tried to do in his Reconstruction Act.

I’ve documented this before, so I’ll quote myself.  Who are Democrats?

The Democrat Party under Woodrow Wilson actually RE-segregated the US Military and government service (after Republicans had de-segregated them and allowed blacks to serve).  The Democrat Party in 1924 was SO completely dominated by the Ku Klux Klan that the Democrat National Convention was called “Klanbake.”    The Democrat Party under FDR and their New Deal was rife with racism and unions and Democrats used it to prevent blacks from getting jobs.  The Democrat Party continued to be THE Party of hard-core racism for the entire history of the republic.  The racist horror story of “Mississippi Burning“ was OWNED by Democrats from the Governor right on down.  In fact, the state Democrat Party in Mississippi was limited to whites only.  And the fact is that a FAR higher percentage of Republican Congressmen and Senators voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act than Democrats.  Democrats were the Party of keeping the black man down until they cynically – incredibly cynically – saw that there was another way to keep exploiting black people to keep them on their plantation and keep them down.

The cry of Democrat blacks today is “Give us welfare or give us death.”  But the two amount to the same thing as blacks have given in to bitterness, hopelessness and a spirit of entitlement rather than trying to actually fulfill the American Dream for themselves.  You can either wait for your damn check to come off the work of other people or you can go out and work your ass off to make your world and your kid’s world a better place.  And because of the Democrat Party, blacks have pursued the former and abandoned the latter.  These are people who have fallen prey to the belief that whitey is out to get them and there isn’t any hope of a fair deal – so why try?  And the only reason that is true is the same Democrat Party who told them that are the very same white people who have actually been the ones keeping them down with promises of welfare for nothing forever.

Or read my slightly different account here about who the Democrats are:

We know that FDR was a racist bigot who detested black people and allowed labor unions to exclude blacks from work that they desperately needed to survive the darkest days of America.

The question as to why black people have in recent years chosen to celebrate and support the party that put their ancestors in the chains of slavery, fought a vicious Civil War to keep them in those chains, invented the Ku Klux Klan as the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party to keep blacks who had been freed by Republicans in subjugation, resegregated blacks under the tyranny of “the father of the modern progressive movement” also known as the racist white supremacist Woodrow Wilson, was still so racist in 1924 that the Democratic National Convention of that year was called “Klanbake,” allowed black men to go untreated with syphilis so researchers could study the progression of the disease (the Tuskegee Experiment) throughout the entire FDR presidency, was largely THE party of racist discrimination through the 1950s, and then only passed the Civil Rights laws with the overwhelming supporting votes of Republicans, is a mystery that I will not attempt to explain.  I have no idea why black people as a culture allowed Democrats who had subjected them to one form of plantation allowed Democrats to bait and switch them into a different form of plantation (the welfare plantation of institutional generational dependency).

Or for more modern facts, read my account here about who Democrats are:

Now, of course, you run into the irony that it was that Grand Old Party that freed the slaves, and fought a bitter war to free the slaves against the Democrat Party that was fighting just as bitterly to keep black people in the chains of human bondage.  But that’s beside the point in the Democrat narrative.

Harry Reid is also on the record admiring Obama as a:

‘light-skinned’ African American ‘with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.’

Maybe it’s because Obama was half white, but Harry Reid nevertheless praises Obama for overcoming that stupid negro dialect.  And being light-skinned is a huge bonus for Harry Reid.  “Whiter is better” when you’re in the party of “the White Man’s Burden.”

Bill Clinton wasn’t quite as happy with the man who was stealing his white wife’s rightful place as leader of the free world.

Bill snidely told Ted Kennedy,

A  few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.”

I know, William Jefferson.  That’s back when southern Democrats like you had a different way of keeping black boys in their proper place.

Senator Robert Byrd, a distinguished “Exalted Cyclops” and “Kleagle” of the famous Democrat-created Ku Klux Klan, was on the record as once saying:

“I  shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by  my side …   Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory  trampled in the   dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved  land of ours become   degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the  blackest specimen from  the  wilds.”

Ah.  There’s that depiction of blacks as being in that long-way-from-being-human I earlier mentioned.

And:

“The Klan is needed  today as never before and I am  anxious to see its  rebirth here in West  Virginia and in every state in  the nation.”

When Bill Clinton honored fellow Democrat Robert “Exalted Cyclops” Byrd, Clinton said:

“He  was a country boy from the hills and hollows of West Virginia. He  was  trying to get elected. And maybe he did something he shouldn’t have   done…”

Well, as long as he was just a Democrat trying to get elected, then ANY racism or racism is fine, isn’t it, Hill Billy?

And you can read here for the massive, hypocrite double-standard that Democrats lived by when it comes to “race.”

Liberals are liars and haters.  And worst of all, they are true moral idiots.  “Democrat” stands for “Demonic Bureaucrat” as they seek to advance two interests: Satan’s love for 55 million murdered human beings in the abortion mills and the worship of homosexual sodomy, plus their determination to replace the God of the Bible with “the State” and make GOVERNMENT our God and Savior while increasingly marginalizing and even criminalizing the worship of Jesus Christ and the God of the Bible.

So what’s this Michael Dunn case about?  I already stated it above.  It is about a guilty man – and I don’t frankly give a damn WHAT color he is – who fired ten shots into a vehicle with kids inside and claimed he was being threatened with a gun when nothing even remotely resembling a gun was found at the scene.

It’s about this question: do you have the right to stand your ground with a gun?  You’re damn right you do – and again, I don’t CARE if you are white or black or Hispanic or Asian or whatever.  Do you have a right to whip out a gun after confronting somebody and then start shooting at them when they are no real threat to you?  You’re damned right you don’t.

Michael Dunn ought to be convicted for his crime of shooting at those kids and for murdering one named Jordan Davis.  And if Michael Dunn were black and the kids were white, he should be every bit as convicted.

And I say that as a conservative and a Republican rather than a racist liberal Democrat.

 

Three Black Thugs Viciously Beat White Boy: Where’s Obama And Sharpton And All The Race-Slandering Demagogues Now?

August 15, 2013

Where are you, Hussein Obama?

Where’s your prepared remarks stating that if you had a son, he’d look just like those thugs beating on that poor white boy the way you pimped Trayvon Martin?

Where’s the liberal mainstream media?  Why aren’t they deliberately darkening the skin of those black thugs to make them appear even more black the way they lightened George Zimmerman’s skin to make him look like a “white Hispanic” so they could demonize him with their propaganda???

Now that these violent punks have been basically sentenced to NINE MONTHS OF PROBATION, rather than punished for their racist beatdown, where are all the leftist mobs screaming in rage over the absence of justice in America?

Where are you coward liberals?

Come on, crawl out of your filthy little nests and speak out about the REAL race hatred sinking America.  I mean, talk about yourselves.

The black homicide rate is TEN TIMES that of whites and Hispanics (that accounts for BOTH sides of George Zimmerman’s heritage, fwiw) combined.  But that doesn’t have anything to do with anything because liberals are pathologically dishonest, demon-possessed hypocrites without shame, without honor and without integrity.  They refuse to address the real issues facing race in America because it undercuts everything that liberalism stands for – and they won’t have that no matter who gets hurt or how many get murdered in the process.

Here’s another question: where are all the white conservative mobs beating people up and vandalizing businesses as just happened among liberal mobs over the George Zimmerman verdict?  If the verdict had gone the other way, were the police terrified of violent white mobs the way they reasonably feared violent black mobs?  And would journalists have been terrified of all the beatings they’d get if Zimmerman had been convicted???  Oh, yeah, that’s right; white conservatives are decent, law-abiding people contrary to Hussein Obama’s demagogic and racist and hateful statement that they are “bitter haters clinging to their guns and their religion and their racist antipathy for people who aren’t exactly like them.  Which is why we wouldn’t take to the streets as violent flash mobs the way we didn’t take to the streets when a black jury found O.J. Simpson not guilty in spite of the fact that he viciously murdered two white people.

We’ve got a new “racist” situation now, involving police who shot and killed a 14-year old black kid:

A 14-year-old boy who police said was armed with a handgun and had fired at another man was fatally shot by a New York City police officer in the Bronx on Sunday morning, authorities said.

Shaaliver Douse was shot in the jaw by a rookie police officer from about 40 feet away after refusing to drop his gun at about 3 a.m. Sunday on East 151st Street and Courtlandt Avenue, authorities said. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

The officers—a 26-year-old white officer and a 27-year-old black officer—were patrolling less than a block away when they heard shots fired, police said. Mr. Douse turned the corner from Courtlandt Avenue and was chasing another man down the middle of the street westbound on East 151st Street and had fired at least three shots at the man when police arrived, authorities said.

A 14-year-old boy, who police said was armed with a handgun and had fired at another man, was fatally shot by a New York City police officer in the Bronx on Sunday morning. Surveillance video provided by NYPD.

Police said the boy then turned the trajectory of the gun more toward the officers and fired a shot. The younger, white officer fired one shot, police said.

[...]

Surveillance footage released by police on Sunday showed a young person who authorities said was Mr. Douse, dressed in a white T-shirt and blue jeans. The person pulls out a handgun and appears to fire at a man standing outside a bodega. A chase ensues that police said led to Mr. Douse’s confrontation with the officers

Police haven’t identified the man Mr. Douse allegedly chased.

A 9mm semiautomatic handgun was recovered at the scene. Police said Mr. Douse has several prior arrests, including one for the attempted murder of a 15-year-old in May and one for bringing a weapon to school last year. Prosecution was deferred in the attempted murder charge because the witness couldn’t identify a shooter, said Steven Reed, a spokesman for the Bronx district attorney’s office.

And all he did was brandish a gun and SHOOT AT POLICE with that gun.  But never mind, that delinquent kid’s delinquent mother believes the police should have died instead, and that returning fire to save their own lives let alone defend the public from another violent and vile thug is wrong.

Another relevant quote:

“That was my sister’s only baby,” Quwana Barcene said. “I’m tired of the police getting away with murder.”

Yeah, I’m pretty damn tired too, Quwana.  Only I’m tired of all the sheer lunatic moral idiocy and the abject refusal of a group of people to EVER accept ANY accountability for ANYTHING they do.

Meanwhile, Oprah is alleging she was the victim of racism because she wasn’t allowed to look at the $40,000 purse she wanted to buy.  I mean, if she’d been a white bag lady, they would have let her put her filthy hands on that obscenely expensive purse, of course.

Hey, for what it’s worth, I agree with Oprah.  Hey, Democrats, let’s NOT be just like Europe, after all; Oprah says they’re racists over there.  The fact that they’re rabid socialists who once literally started a world war over whether the world ought to be fascist national socialist or communist international socialist being entirely besides the point.

Mind you, we’re now learning that in all likelihood, Oprah significantly altered her “story” in order to demagogue racist allegations, much the way the movie she is trying to pimp significantly alters actual history to do the same damn thing by racially sliming Ronald Reagan.

And if the three black thugs beating the white boy on a school bus wasn’t “racist” enough in its hate for you, how about the attack where two black kids decided to murder a white kid “just for the fun of it”???  Note that the white kid who was arrested merely drove the vehicle carrying the two black murderers.  Again, where ARE you, Obama?  Why aren’t you telling America that one of these two murderous thugs would have looked just like your son?  Where ARE you, Al Sharpton?  Where’s that racist bigotry of yours now?

George Zimmerman never said ANYTHING hateful about white people and liberals invented the brand-new category of “white Hispanic” while they slandered him as a race-murderer.  Now we’ve got a black thug who murdered a young white man openly tweeting,

“90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.”

And just to make sure that there is a clear and obvious connection between the liberal hypocrisy of the George Zimmerman case and the liberal hypocrisy of the James Edwards case, the young black murdering thug made it for us:

On July 15, days after the George Zimmerman verdict, Edwards tweeted “Ayeee I knocced out 5 woods since Zimmerman court!:) lol shit ima keep sleepin shit! #ayeeee.”

“Woods” is a derogatory term for white people.

And just where the hell ARE you hateful liberal hypocrites???

Crickets do an awful lot of chirping after all the race-hatred crimes of blacks against whites.  Until the next time that a black kid is the victim of a white (even if they have to invent categories such as “white Hispanic” to pull it off).  Then the bitter wailing and hate is echoed

Yeah, I’m “tired” too.  I’m tired of all the race pimps peddling their liberal fascist hate by making up lies to slander anybody who gets in the way of all their “stories” designed to frame innocent people.

[Note; I updated this article on August 21 upon learning that my original link to the "fourteen-year-old boy being shot by police" getting purged].

The Left Goes Batpoop Over George Zimmerman’s ‘God’s Plan’ Remark. My Thoughts On The Subject.

July 23, 2012

The leftwing media is in a frothing hysteria about George Zimmerman’s words:

I feel it was all God’s plan.”

You had better bet that the witch-hunting prosecution will be as eager to condemn this “heresy” as the press when they go after Zimmerman in a courtroom for daring to defend his own life.  I hope they are ready for it when it comes at them: “Mr. Zimmerman, were you acting as an agent for God when you shot and killed the victim?  Didn’t you say that you thought it was God’s plan for you to kill Trayvon Martin?”

When I heard George Zimmerman refer to “God’s plan” in his interview with Sean Hannity, I a) immediately understood him to be referring more to the fact that he had survived than that Trayvon Martin had been killed and b) just as immediately knew that the press would have a field day depicting Zimmerman as some crazed hater out “doing God’s will” by murdering teenagers. Because that’s the way they’ve exploited this tragedy from the very beginning in terms of prejudicing every single story against George Zimmerman.

Let me take on Trayvon Martin’s father’s words:

As Trayvon Martin’s father told the Associated Press, “We must worship a different God. There is no way that my God wanted George Zimmerman to murder my teenage son.”

I would argue that, yes, we probably have a very different God.

Trayvon Martin’s father has a god who has no plan.  God didn’t have a plan that night that Trayvon Martin was shot.  The Martin family god isn’t smart enough, or isn’t powerful enough, or isn’t even good enough, to have had a plan.  The Martin family god wasn’t even there that night.  Because their god isn’t very much good for anything.

My God IS smart enough, because my God is omniscient and knows everything.  My God IS powerful enough, because He is omnipotent and knows everything.  My God IS good enough, because He is omnibenevolent and serves as the universal standard throughout the universe that He created as to what is good.  And my God WAS there that night, because my God is omnipresent and his presence fills His universe such that nothing was beyond Him.

When you really start asking questions about how God DIDN’T have a plan the night Trayvon Martin was killed, and understand that “if God didn’t want Trayvon Martin ‘murdered'” the way Trayvon Martin’s father – and pretty much the entirety of the mainstream media propaganda – frames the discussion, that God pretty much isn’t in charge of a damn thing in this world, you start to realize what George Zimmerman meant.  I don’t know about Trayvon Martin’s father; but I DO know that an astonishing majority of the mainstream media are atheists in proportion to the 92% of Americans who believe in God.  For example:

“And while about 60 percent of Americans say morality and a belief in God are inexorably linked, only 6 percent of national journalists and executives surveyed believe that.:

So you need to understand that the people who are attacking “God’s plan” and the people who most hate God to begin with are largely, albeit not exclusively, the same people.

On my view, and apparently on George Zimmerman’s view, God WAS there the night that Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin and Trayvon Martin died, and God DID have a plan.  These are simply necessary theological premises for anyone who takes the Holy Bible even remotely seriously.  There are many things which happen in this world – a world tainted by the Fall described in the first chapters of Genesis – that we don’t and frankly can’t understand.  But that doesn’t make it any less true.

God is not the author of evil.  He did not “invent” evil OR good, for that matter.  God IS good; goodness is an essential quality in God that necessarily flows from His character.  But when God created free-willed beings (angels and humans), God knew that these free-willed, finite, limited beings would ultimately be corrupted and would choose (“invent”) evil out of their natures.  Neither the fall of Lucifer and a third of His angels nor the subsequent fall of Adam and Eve in the Garden took God by surprise.  There is a line from a movie: “Infinite goodness is creating a being you know in advance is going to complain.”  God knew the fall would happen; He didn’t WANT it to happen or will it to happen; but He knew THAT it would happen.  He knew that limited, finite beings would ultimately selfishly choose to reject Him and His plan.  But God had a plan that would overcome evil and bring about a greater good.  In fact, a good so great that it would overcome and outweigh all the evil that was done by His created, free-willed beings since the beginning of time.

In my own theology, the rebirth of Israel was a major component of God’s prophetic plan.  Ezekiel 37:1-14 as dried up, dead, desiccated bones that will return to life.  Which is exactly what happened in the miracle of 1948 when a nation that had been dead for centuries returned to life.  Jesus is the Son, the Word of God (John 1:1-3).  And yes, Jews have largely rejected God’s Son.  But God never turned His back on His people the Jews.  God’s hand is on the Jews, whether they like it or not.  They ARE “His people.”  In the fullness of time, according to His divine plan, God WILL return to Israel and will ultimately bring them to a point in which He “will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn” (Zechariah 12:10).

Now, with that, if I say, “The Holocaust was God’s plan,” it can very easily be framed in a way that sounds utterly hateful and abhorrent.  It can easily be made to sound heartless.  It is a statement that is a “Godsend” for God-hating propagandists. 

But it was part of God’s plan, nevertheless.  God did not WANT the Holocaust to happen; God did NOT want 6 million Jews to be killed as if they were insects to be exterminated.  But God also did not want the Jewish people to forever continue to wander without a land as they had prior to 1948.  And God did not want them to continue to wallow in unbelief of the God who had called to them through Abraham, through Isaac, through Jacob – and yes, through their Messiah Jesus.

It was as a result of the Holocaust that a shamed, grieving world finally allowed the creation of a Jewish state in 1948.  Simply put, no objection could outweigh the suffering that the Jewish people had suffered; no sufficient reson could be provided that the Jews should not have a government to protect them against the next monster to come along.  And so in 1948, accompanied by miracle after miracle, the nation of Israel emerged and triumphed over an enemy that outnumbered them fifty to one who was as determined to exterminate them as Hitler had been.

And ultimately, I believe with every fiber of my being that God will be true to His word to Israel and not abandon them, but bring them into His arms and into true “shalom.”

What’s the flip side of that view?  The flip side is that the Holocaust was merely an event that had no meaning and no higher purpose.  It was just “one of those tragic things.”  God didn’t have any plan and He wasn’t involved.  God was just casually watching the earth like a cosmic fishbowl for His amusement.  There is no purpose to evil and suffering; in fact, there’s really no purpose in anything.  We might talk about “God” to comfort ourselves, but really there is nobody upstairs.   And George Zimmerman’s words, “I feel it was all God’s plan,” are incorrect simply because God isn’t the kind of being who is capable of having a plan or seeing His plan through, is He?

Elie Wiesel recounts a particularly terrible moment of his life in chapter 4 of his book Night.  In chapter 3, he’d arrived at Auschwitz.  He was told, “Do you see that chimney over there?  See it? Do you see those flames? (Yes, we did see the flames).  Over there – that’s where you’re going to be taken.  That’s your grave, over there.”  In the next chapter, Wiesel recounts how the Nazis decided to make an example of three men whom they randomly pulled out of the line of inmates and hung on a gallows.  Two of the men were older, and died quickly.  But one, whom Wiesal described as “an angel-faced pipel,” struggled grotesquely as he strangled to death on the gallows.  “Where is God now?” Wiesel heard a voice muttering behind him.  “Where is God?”  And Wiesel wrote, “And I heard a voice within me answer him: ‘Where is He? Here He is—He is hanging here on this gallows. . . .'”

Which God literally hung in death, having been executed for His people?  Re-read Zechariah 12:10 and then read the Gospel of John for that answer.

Yes, God was at Auschwitz.  God was there.  The same God that Christians know who hung and died on the cross for our sins was there in the very darkest moment of the Jews.   God grieved.  But God had a plan.

Had God decided to abandon mankind to its sins and its self-destructiveness?  There’s a story that I remember vividly.  In 1994 a South Carolina mother named Susan Smith loaded her two young children into a car and then rolled that car into a lake so that they would drown.  Why?  Because she wanted to be with a man who didn’t want a ready-made family.  And she could have other children him, right?  Sometimes we feel that God is that kind of God.  But the coming of Jesus into the world proves that He isn’t.  Our God is a God who comes to us in the darkness and in our terror.  He comes to our aid.  He rescues us.  Even in the worst and the ugliest moments.  The great biography “The Hiding Place” by Corrie Ten Boom recounts the extermination of her entire Dutch family in the death camps for having dared to help Jews.  Before she died in the Ravensbrück death camp after having been beaten by a guard, Corrie’s sister Betsie assured her, “There is no pit so deep that God’s love is not deeper still.”

And there isn’t.

No matter what happens.

It comforts me to believe – to know by faith – that God has a design, a plan, for even the terrible things that happen.

If one of my loved ones were shot and killed – whether by accident, in an act of self-defense, or in a murder – it would comfort me to believe that God had some greater purpose for allowing that death to occur.

I hope that the Martin family can get to the point in which they care capable of accepting comfort in the belief that God had some higher purpose in allowing their son to be killed.

But while I agree that tactically, given the sheer theological ignorance and the left’s clear intent to frame and blame George Zimmerman in every way imaginable, George Zimmerman’s words were probably not the wisest, I nevertheless can’t see anything wrong with what he said from the standpoint of someone who bothers to read his Bible.

As I write this, America is reeling over the latest tragedy as James Holmes perpetuated our latest mass murder in a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado.  People are asking, “What’s wrong with the world?”

Well, it reminds me of a true story about G.K. Chesterton.  Long ago, the London Times asked a number of different writers for essays on the topic to be published in the newspaper on exactly that topic – “What’s Wrong with the World?”  And the other writers wrote thousands of words explaining the dilemma of the world, but Chesterton’s essay was by far the shortest and by far the most to the point.  Chesterton wrote, “Dear sirs:  I am.  Sincerely yours, G.K. Chesterton.”

God could end evil today.  All He would have to do is wipe you – yes, that’s YOU – out.  Along with me.  Because of the evil that WE do.

One day, which I believe is coming soon, God WILL finally end all evil.  Until that day, I believe that God ultimately has a purpose for everything that happens in this world.  And a plan to bring ultimate good to fruition.

Obama FBI Thinks It’s A ‘Hate Crime’ That George Zimmerman Bloodied Trayvon Martin’s Knuckles With His Broken Nose And Lacerated Head

May 18, 2012

Never bring a lawsuit against a black, Obama DOJ lawyers were instructed.

There was a challenge delivered by mega-geek Sheldon Cooper to one of his geek friends:

“Well, I grew up with an older brother and a very contentious twin sister, and I believe I can easily best you in any physical confrontation, be it noogies, swirlies or the classic Why Are You Hitting Yourself?”

That’s basically the game Obama’s shyster Eric Holder is playing with George Zimmerman: why were you hitting yourself, George?  No matter how wrong or how unreasonable it is, it’s not just a stupid game when the federal government is the one administering the judicial equivalent of swirlies and noogies and “Why Are You Hitting Yourself?” tactics.  You see, it turns out that George Zimmerman used his face to hit Trayvon Martin’s knuckles, and that’s a hate crime around these here parts when we’re running things.

FBI Seeks To Charge George Zimmerman With Hate Crime
May 14, 2012

Excerpted from WFTV: SANFORD, Fla. — WFTV has learned charges against George Zimmerman could be getting more serious.

State prosecutors said Zimmerman, a neighborhood watchman, profiled and stalked 17-year-old Trayvon Martin before killing him, so the FBI is now looking into charging him with a hate crime.

FBI investigators are actively questioning witnesses in the retreat at the Twin Lakes neighborhood, seeking evidence for a possible federal hate crime charge.

Martin was unarmed when he was shot to death, police said, and some accuse Zimmerman of targeting the teenager solely because of the color of his skin.

WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said federal prosecutors would have to prove the hate crime to charge Zimmerman, though.

“What the government would have to prove is that Mr. Zimmerman acted out of hatred toward African-Americans. That’s why he came into contact with him. That’s why he shot and killed him,” Sheaffer said.

Sheaffer said a federal hate crime murder charge could bring more serious consequences than the second-degree murder charge Zimmerman faces now.

“Mr. Zimmerman could be punished by up to life in prison or even the death penalty,” said Sheaffer.

Zimmerman said he used deadly force in self-defense after Martin punched him, knocked him to the ground and repeatedly slammed his head against a sidewalk.

In the meantime, a photograph recently surfaced which is said to show Zimmerman’s mother in the arms of her grandfather, who is black.

Zimmerman’s mother testified at his bond hearing that she has met the black child whom he mentored and even risked his safety in a dangerous neighborhood to do it, because he didn’t want to abandon the child. 

Okay, Obama sicked Attorney General Eric Holder who sicked the FBI on George Zimmerman.  Because apparently “Never bring a lawsuit against a black” doesn’t go as far as these racist pigs want to go.

Never mind that pretty much ALL the evidence now completely conforms Zimmerman’s account:

ABC News Exclusive: Zimmerman Medical Report Shows Broken Nose, Lacerations After Trayvon Martin Shooting
By MATT GUTMAN (@mattgutmanABC) and SENI TIENABESO (@senijr_abc)
May 15, 2012

A medical report compiled by the family physician of Trayvon Martin shooter George Zimmerman and obtained exclusively by ABC News found that Zimmerman was diagnosed with a “closed fracture” of his nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back of his head and a minor back injury the day after he fatally shot Martin during an alleged altercation.
 
Zimmerman faces a second degree murder charge for the Feb. 26 shooting that left the unarmed 17-year-old high school junior dead. Zimmerman has claimed self defense in what he described as a life and death struggle that Martin initiated by accosting him, punching him in the face, then repeatedly bashing his head into the pavement.
 
Also today, a trove of documents are being examined by lawyers for both the defense and prosecution as part of discovery in Zimmerman’s trial — including 67 CDs worth of documents, video of Martin on the night of the shooting, his autopsy report and videos of Zimmerman’s questioning by police.
 
Zimmerman’s three-page medical report is included in those documents that the defense could use as evidence.
 
Watch World News with Diane Sawyer for the latest on the Trayvon Martin shooting and the trial of George Zimmerman.
 
The morning after the shooting, on Feb. 27, Zimmerman sought treatment at the offices of a general physician at a family practice near Sanford, Fla. The doctor notes Zimmerman sought an appointment to get legal clearance to return to work.

The record shows that Zimmerman also suffered bruising in the upper lip and cheek and lower back pain. The two lacerations on the back of his head, one of them nearly an inch long, the other about a quarter-inch long, were first revealed in photos obtained exclusively by ABC News last month.
 
But the report also shows Zimmerman declined hospitalization the night of the shooting, and then declined the advice of his doctor to make a follow-up appointment with an ear nose and throat doctor.
 
In addition to his physical injuries, Zimmerman complained of stress and “occasional nausea when thinking about the violence.” But he was not diagnosed with a concussion. The doctor noted that it was “imperative” that Zimmerman “be seen with [sic] his psychologist for evaluation.”
 
According to the report, prior to the shooting Zimmerman had been prescribed Adderall and Temazepam, medications that can cause side effects such as agitation and mood swings, but in fewer than 10 percent of patients.
 
A neighbor told ABC News that the day after the shooting he saw Zimmerman as he spoke to officers outside his home. He too recalled seeing black eyes and significant swelling — as well as a bandage over his nose.
 
Moments after the shooting Zimmerman told eyewitnesses he shot Martin in self defense. He later told officers his head was being pounded into the pavement and that he feared for his life, but that it was only when Martin seemed to reach for the gun wedges in his waistband that Zimmerman drew his weapon and fired directly into Martin’s chest — killing him.
 
The medical notes may bolster Zimmerman’s claim that he acted in self-defense because he was being attacked. However, the prosecution contends that Zimmerman instigated the confrontation after profiling the teen, who was walking home after buying skittles and ice tea. They prosecution says Martin was breaking no laws and was not disturbing anyone as he walked back to his father’s girlfriend’s home.
 
Zimmerman was granted a $150,000 bail and has since been in deep hiding since his April 20 bail hearing.

There has never been and never will be enough evidence for any liberal to ever believe anything other than what their authority figures tell them to believe, I know, but I saw a single picture taken at night by the officer at the scene that was broadcast on Fox News yesterday (5/17); and it showed George Zimmerman’s face.  There was no question that his nose was clearly swelling from a fracture and his eyes were beginning to blacken. 

I looked for that photo and could not find it online; but anyone who has ever had a broken nose (as I have) can take one look at that image and see the obvious.

But there’s still more:

Autopsy: Trayvon Martin Had Knuckle Injuries
Wednesday, 16 May 2012 11:06 AM
Autopsy results show that Trayvon Martin, the 17-year-old whose shooting death in Florida has turned into a national controversy, had injuries to his knuckles when he died, Orlando TV station WFTV reports.

That evidence could back up George Zimmerman’s claim that Martin beat him up before Zimmerman shot and killed him. Zimmerman said that Martin broke his nose and slammed his head on the sidewalk before Zimmerman opened fire.

The autopsy found that Martin had broken skin on his knuckles. Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara declined to comment on that evidence.

But WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said it helps the defense, as Martin’s knuckle injury appears much less serious than Zimmerman’s bloody head wounds. “It goes along with Zimmerman’s story that he acted in self-defense, because he was getting beaten up by Trayvon Martin,” Sheaffer said.

But another explanation is possible for Martin’s knuckle injury too. “It could be consistent with Trayvon either trying to get away or defend himself,” Sheaffer said.

Zimmerman killed the unarmed Martin Feb. 26 after calling 911 to report that he was acting suspiciously. Zimmerman said Martin hit him first and that he shot in self-defense after no one acted on his cries for help.

The only eyewitness to the events immediately before the shooting has stated for the record that Trayvon Martin was on top of George Zimmerman beating the crap out of Zimmerman’s face while Zimmerman cried out for help.

I heard the actual audio testimony from this eyewitness; there is absolutely no question whatsoever who was on the ground getting beat (Zimmerman) and who was on top doing the beating (Martin).  There is also no question who was shouting for help (Zimmerman).

From CBS News, May 18, 2012:

No doubt who was screaming for help, eye witness account:

“In a statement to police the night of the shooting, witness 6 said he saw two men wrestling on the ground. He said he saw a man matching Martin’s description on top, punching Zimmerman on the ground.”

“The one guy on top in the black hoodie was pretty much just throwing down blows on the guy kind of MMA-style,” witness 6 told Sanford police within hours of the shooting.

“The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911,” he said.

Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.

“MMA-style” is mixed martial arts-style.  Zimmerman was helplessly taking a beating that could have ended his life and absorbing one punch after another ad nauseum.  Unless he used his gun in a blatantly obvious act of self-defense.

Just when it basically can’t be any more obvious that this case needs to be dismissed and George Zimmerman needs to be set free with about a million apologies from the state of Florida and so-called “civil rights leaders” such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, Obama dumps this “hate crime” crap on Zimmerman.

The mainstream media did everything they could to help their messiah Obama punish the Hispanic who in a clear act of self-defense shot Obama’s “son” Trayvon MartinThey covered up the fact that Zimmerman was Hispanic and altered the photographs to deceitfully make Zimmerman appear white; they falsified audio evidence; they falsified video evidence (see also here and here); and they repeatedly drew bogus conclusions to frame George Zimmerman to demonize him to any potential jury even as they shrilly demanded Zimmerman face such a mob/jury.

Now when pretty much every other loose end has emerged in George Zimmerman’s favor, we also find that Trayvon Martin had drugs in his system.  Which is to say that any sense of “paranoia” that might have justified Martin’s physical attack on Zimmerman the resulted in Zimmerman’s shooting Martin was drug-induced psychosis rather than any reasonable sense of fear.

This case is just one more powerful reason Obama needs to be thrown out of office.  It was beyond inexcusable and contemptible for Obama to publicly involve himself in this case in just a clearly racially-biased way.  And it is clearly immoral for Obama’s thug Attorney General to be persecuting Zimmerman for a “hate crime” when the only “hate crime” is what the Obama federal government is doing to a clearly innocent man.

Mainstream Media Lynching Of George Zimmerman Pretty Much Confirms Everything I’ve Said About Both Liberalism And ‘Journalism’

April 21, 2012

Keep in mind that the mainstream media (CBS being the primary culprit) posted video of George Zimmerman being arrested and claimed that there were “no apparent injuries” to Zimmerman.  And all the screeching liberals then stated as fact that George Zimmerman was a cold-blooded murderer, etc, etc.

It didn’t matter that it was a giant load of crap.  The liberal media is to “truth” what the sun is to “cold”; neither has so much as an iota of the aforementioned qualities.

There is no question that this picture obtained by ABC was taken by the officers at the shooting scene:

This simple FACT was obvious from the very start in the police report:

While I was in such close contact with Zimmerman, I could observe that his back appeared to be wet and was covered in grass, as if he had been laying on his back on the ground. Zimmerman was also bleeding from the nose and back of his head.”

No apparent injuries George Zimmerman’s bleeding head!  But there’s nothing wrong with being wrong as long as you’re serving as one of the faithful attack dogs for liberalism and political correctness, is there.  Which is why their blatantly obvious act of biased and deceitful reporting is simply whistled away.

One of the other things that was interesting that came out today was just how incredibly “Hispanic” Zimmerman looked:

In spite of everything the media did to try to cover that up so they could make him “white” – and therefore destroy him as a “racist bigot”:

Exhibit A: “Martin, who was black, was on his way to a convenience store in a mostly white gated community when George Zimmerman, who is white, shot and killed him after a disputed altercation.”  — Gwen Ifill, PBS “Newshour” anchor

Exhibit B: ABC deliberately altered the George Zimmerman booking photo to make him appear “white”:

THIS was the effect that the media was trying to create in doctoring/altering the photo to turn George Zimmerman into “whitey”:

It would have been a lot harder to fabricate if George Zimmerman had been Hispanic instead of the “pussy ass cracker” the mainstream media propaganda mill made him into.  It’s wrong to hate on Hispanics, of course, but every self-respecting liberal despises whitey – especially if that liberal is himself or herself white.  Self-hating whitey has been a requirement for liberals since Karl Marx came along and showed the left how to properly self-hate:

There were also great Jewish philosophers who suffered from an aggravated confusion over their Jewish identities. Karl Marx is perhaps the most extreme example of this. It is curious to note that both his mother and father were the offspring of rabbis. Marx’s father, who became a prominent Russian Jewish lawyer, converted to Protestantism because of an edict prohibiting Jews from being legal advocates. In Marx’s own materialistic interpretation of the world, he found no place for a valid Jewish experience. In his essay “Zur Judenfrage” (“About the JewishQuestion”) he wrote:

What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money…Out of its entrails bourgeois society continually creates Jews.” [Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 11, pp. 1071- 1074]

How ironic that Marx’s view of his own Jewish people became a view of Hitler, who boasted of his anti-Communism.

And of course there was nothing “ironic” about it: Nothing would have made Karl Marx happier than to find out that somebody was “inspired” by his writings to put 6 million of his fellow Jews into gas chambers; just like nothing would make a white liberal happier than having his own race marginalized and demonized in a “multi-cultural society.”  The liberal mind is a diseased mind; and self-loathing is the fruit of a diseased mind.

Exhibit C: The New York Times infamously labelling George Zimmerman as a “white Hispanic” in defiance of their very own “political correctness” and in frightening similarity to the Nazi Mischling laws of the 1930s that attempted to categorize how “Jewish” one was:

Mr. Zimmerman, 28, a white Hispanic, told the police that he shot Trayvon in self-defense after an altercation. The teenager was walking home from a convenience store, where he bought iced tea and Skittles, when he was shot once in the chest.

Let’s try that: Mr. Obama, 50, a white African-American, lied to the American people again today…

Nope.  Sounds pretty damn racist. 

The Washington Times puts a lot of the mainstream media propaganda shenanigans together:

I see that the New York Times let us know the dastardly George Zimmerman was a “white Hispanic” – and the Times seems to have put an emphasis on “white.” However, it did not tell the general public that Mr. Zimmerman is a registered Democrat.

Now we learn that the NBC News department left off the question from the police dispatcher asking Mr. Zimmerman the race of the person he was following, Trayvon Martin. Why was that omitted? In both cases, the omissions seem to have been made only to support the developing narrative that mean, white George Zimmerman is a racist.

How could the New York Times make the distinction that he was white? And leaving out the question from the dispatcher as to the race of the person being followed made it appear that Mr. Zimmerman could have been targeting Trayvon for his race. By now everyone must know that ABC News also got to take a few shots at Mr. Zimmerman. When broadcasting a video of him, ABC conveniently covered the back of his head with a banner on the screen. After receiving many complaints, they removed the banner, and then you could see it appeared that Mr. Zimmerman had some kind of cut on the back of his head. Dare I ask again why this happened? Was the object to tell this story, or was it to hide the truth?

Then there’s the crap they pulled with Trayvon Martin by bombarding us with pictures of a smiling little twelve-year old boy:

Instead of what he really looked like at the time George Zimmerman saw him:

Let’s try that with another sweet-faced and obviously innocent guy:

Charles Manson was a charming young kid who couldn’t have done anything wrong and that picture proves it.

And of course the same mainstream media propaganda machine that pimped pictures of a twelve-year-old and clearly “innocent” Trayvon Martin rather than showing him for what he was when it MATTERED  (the night of the shooting) simultaneously used a booking photo from the worst moment in George Zimmerman’s life.  And then doctored it to frame him even FURTHER in the court of public opinion.

ALL of the mainstream media has been convicted for obvious bias and deceit.

NBC despicably altered the 911 call audio to deceitfully make it appear that George Zimmerman was a racist who was out to emphasize that Trayvon Martin was black:

The Today show’s segment, which included an ellipsis on screen to indicate omitted text, ran as:

Zimmerman: ‘This guy looks like he’s up to no good …’

Zimmerman: ‘He looks black.’

The full conversation ran as:

Zimmerman: ‘This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.’

Dispatcher: ‘OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?’

Zimmerman: ‘He looks black.’

NBC literally tried to explain that this was just some perfectly innocent error, that some engineer somehow accidentally happened to inadvertently erase the dispatcher’s voice and it was all just completely innocent.  And only a diseased liberal mind would accept that “explanation,” just as only a diseased liberal mind would try to fabricate “evidence” to falsely turn a man into a “racist” to begin with.

In the same way, CNN “enhanced” the 911 audio to “prove” that George Zimmerman was a racist bigot who said – and excuse the language here – “fucking coons” during the 911 call.  BUT IT WAS A LIE:

Recently, CNN enhanced audio of George Zimmerman — the man who shot Trayvon Martin — to try to determine if he did, in fact, use a racial slur while calling police on the night of the shooting. Back then, it sounded like Zimmerman might have used the phrase “fu**ing coons,” and his critics have cited it as evidence of a racially-motivated attack. But now CNN has enhanced the audio again, and the reporter is casting doubts that the term was used.

(Related: ‘This Is for Trayvon’: 6 Youths Attack 78-Year-Old Man in Alleged Racially-Charged Attack)

“It certainly sounds like that word to me,” Gary Tuckman said when the audio was first enhanced. But after the latest enhancement, he’s not so sure:

“Now it does sound less like that racial slur. … From listening in this room, and this is a state-of-the-art room, it doesn’t sound like that slur anymore. It sounds like … we‘re hearing the swear word at first and then the word ’cold.’ And the reason some say that would be relevant, is because it was unseasonably cold in Florida that night and raining.”

The audio expert agreed it sounded like “cold,” and said the new method gets rid of a lot more background noise but doesn’t change the voice or words.

Sorry we fabricated evidence to turn you into a racist and incite pretty much the entire black community to want to murder you and your entire family, George.  Our boo-boo.  Sorry we helped destroy your life and all.

A further lie that I have heard reported over and over again is that George Zimmerman continued to follow Trayvon Martin after he was instructed to stop.  The evidence simply does not support that; rather, it supports Zimmerman’s account that after being instructed to stop following Martin he got a final address and then began heading back to his truck:

From the call released by the Sanford Police:

At 2:07, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, “He’s running.”

At 2:09, you can hear a car door open and an alarm begins that is undoubtedly the “door open, keys in ignition” warning on Zimmerman’s truck.

At 2:13, you can clearly hear the car door slamming shut, and the alarm stops.

At 2:17, Zimmerman’s voice wobbles and he starts breathing heavily into the phone, indicating that he has started running.

At 2:22, without any prompting other than the aforementioned noises and breathing, the dispatcher asks “Are you following him?” to which Zimmerman responds, “Yeah.”

At 2:26, the dispatcher says, “Okay, we don’t need you to do that,” to which Zimmerman responds, “Okay.”

Zimmerman proceeds to give the dispatcher his name. Then he says, “He ran.”

Zimmerman can still be heard breathing into the phone until about 2:39, at which point the heavy breathing stops entirely, a mere 13 seconds after the dispatcher asked him to stop following. A very calm and collected Zimmerman then proceeds to give the dispatcher his own information, directions and a description of his location for another 1 minute and 33 seconds.

The difference between someone running while on the phone and not running can be heard quite clearly, and I encourage readers to listen for themselves.

There’s another reason to believe that Zimmerman stopped following Martin: After he gives the dispatcher his personal address, at 3:35, he says, “Oh crap, I don’t want to give that all out. I don’t know where this kid is,” meaning he is worried Martin might hear where he lives. If Zimmerman doesn’t even know where Martin is, would it even be possible for him to still be following Martin at this point? Would it even be possible for him to have continued following Martin after hanging up the phone — a full two minutes after he first got out of his car and a minute and a half after he fully stops breathing heavily — unless Martin came back and revealed himself?

It was a mistake for Zimmerman to leave his car in the first place. But while the audio may not decisively prove that Zimmerman stopped following Martin when the dispatcher asked him to, it is very strong evidence that he did, especially when coupled with his testimony to police the night of the incident. But that isn’t even the point.

The point is this: With no witnesses stating that Zimmerman defied the dispatcher’s wishes and continued following Martin and no evidence to suggest he did, how did the idea that he pursued Martin after the dispatcher told him not to become a universally recognized, undisputed fact?

That it did is a testament to Al Sharpton’s ability to manipulate the media — and the media’s willingness to be manipulated.

The eyewitness in this case has almost completely confirmed George Zimmerman’s account of what happened that night:

But one man’s testimony could be key for the police.

“The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911,” he said.

Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.

The witness only wanted to be identified as “John,” and didn’t not want to be shown on camera.

His statements to police were instrumental, because police backed up Zimmerman’s claims, saying those screams on the 911 call are those of Zimmerman.

“When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point,” John said.

Zimmerman says the shooting was self defense. According to information released on the Sanford city website, Zimmerman said he was going back to his SUV when he was attacked by the teen.

Sanford police say Zimmerman was bloody in his face and head, and the back of his shirt was wet and had grass stains, indicating a struggle took place before the shooting

The police report that night also corroborates Zimmerman’s account:

According to the initial police report, Zimmerman, 28, told police he was screaming for help and that no one would help him. The report also said Zimmerman was bleeding from the nose and the back of the head.

Officials said in the report that Zimmerman’s back appeared wet and that he was covered in grass.

Nevertheless, there is widespread reports from the same biased and dishonest and slanted sources as did all the OTHER crap reporting that the cry for help could not have been George Zimmerman.

This is the liberalism and the news media propaganda that I have been describing for four years now.  It is evil; it is based on lies and pure distilled deceit on a daily basis.  And the more “established” and the more “elite” the media is – The New York Times, ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC – the more dishonest and biased it is.

Liberals might respond and say something like, “But it was those liberal media that corrected themselves.”  I’ve got two responses: the first is that the only reason the leftwing propaganda corrected their own lies is because honest media confronted them with their lies and forced them to make the corrections.  For example, in the case of NBC fabricating the 911 audio to remove the dispatcher asking Zimmerman to identify Trayvon Martin’s race we find:

NBC News issued an apology today for the way it edited a broadcast of a conversation between George Zimmerman and a police dispatcher before teenager Trayvon Martin was killed.

Last week Fox News did a report in which it presented ‘before’ and ‘after’ versions of the call. NBC had broadcast the edited exchange on its flagship ‘Today’ morning show.

NBC News launched an investigation after the Fox report. ‘During our investigation it became evident that there was an error made in the production process that we deeply regret,’ NBC News representative Lauren Kapp said in a statement on Tuesday.

If Fox News hadn’t been there to report the TRUTH – and liberals HATE Fox News FOR reporting the truth – that story would have never been refuted or corrected.

My second response is that opening the barn door after the horses have burned to death doesn’t exactly save the horses.  This gets to Mark Twain’s famous quip that a lie gets halfway around the world before the truth can get its boots on.  The media have got EXACTLY what they wanted: they have poisoned the country against George Zimmerman and flamed the fire of racist hate in the black community which largely continues to believe ALL of the above now-documented lies.

The judge frankly ought to dismiss this case and tell the black community – which is already beyond outraged after all the lies they have been told – that if they want to go after the people who are to blame for the case being thrown out, they ought to go after all the pseudo-journalists from the mainstream media who guaranteed that George Zimmerman could not possibly receive a fair trial.  Furthermore, even the left agrees that there is absolutely no way whatsoever that this case – having been so exploited by both Obama and the left – is going to end in a conviction.  It will be a referendum on guns, on Obama, on what Obama’s son would have looked like, on the stand your ground law, on race, on everything but what it SHOULD have been on.

Any possibility for true justice died in this case the day Barack Obama cynically exploited it:

ABC News Enhances Zimmerman Arrest Video And FINDS ‘A Pair Of Gashes Or Welts On George Zimmerman’s Head’

April 2, 2012

Put this in your crack pipe and smoke it, you evil Democrats:

Trayvon Martin: ABC enhances George Zimmerman video
9:31 a.m. EST, April 2, 2012|By Hal Boedeker, Sentinel Staff Writer

ABC News has re-digitized video of George Zimmerman taken shortly after Trayvon Martin‘s shooting.

The video was unveiled as an exclusive this morning on”Good Morning America.”ABC was the first news organization to show the original tape.

Reporter Matt Gutman said the clearer video shows “what appear to be a pair of gashes or welts on George Zimmerman’s head.”

Neighborhood Watch volunteer Zimmerman has said he shot 17-year-old Trayvon in self-defense. The video shows Zimmerman arriving at the Sanford Police Department within an hour after the shooting.

Gutman said the video had been “clarified” by Forensic Protection Inc. Former FBI Special Agent Brad Garrett told ABC that the clearer video shows “marks on the back of Mr. Zimmerman’s head.”

The enhanced video currently appears at this ABC News link with the title “George Zimmerman: Enhanced Video Shows Injury.”

Here is a screenshot captured from that video that shows the injuries to the back of Zimmerman’s head:

Allow me to simply copy and paste my response to a liberal in a comment to provide the details of the case up to this point:

But we have an eyewitness saying this:

But one man’s testimony could be key for the police.

“The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911,” he said.

Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.

The witness only wanted to be identified as “John,” and didn’t not want to be shown on camera.

His statements to police were instrumental, because police backed up Zimmerman’s claims, saying those screams on the 911 call are those of Zimmerman.

“When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point,” John said.

What is most damning about the video is the fact that it confirms that Zimmerman WAS wearing a red jacket exactly as the eyewitness described in conformation of his account.

And we have the police saying this:

Sanford police say Zimmerman was bloody in his face and head, and the back of his shirt was wet and had grass stains, indicating a struggle took place before the shooting.

And a close analysis of the video does in fact seem to reveal an injury to the back of Zimmerman’s head.

Here’s what the police officer who disarmed and handcuffed Zimmerman said in his official police report:

While I was in such close contact with Zimmerman, I could observe that his back appeared to be wet and was covered in grass, as if he had been laying on his back on the ground. Zimmerman was also bleeding from the nose and back of his head.”

So we’ve got Zimmerman saying he was attacked and beaten. We’ve got an eyewitness saying that Zimmerman was on his back being attacked and beaten with Trayvon Martin on top of him and beating on him. We’ve got the officer on the scene noting Zimmerman’s inuries to his nose and back of his head in his report. And we’ve got the police telling us that one of the reasons they’d let him go was that he had clearly been attacked and beaten which documented why he legitimately believed he was in danger.

But I’ve long-since given up trying to explain reality to liberals.

Democrats are genuinely evil.  Their souls swim in an ocean of lies.  Obama interfered in this case to illegitimately take sides; Democrats all over the place (e.g. Bobby Rush) crawl out of their nests to put on “hoodies” and further hype the case.  Democrat Frederica Wilson shrieked anger over the “sweet young boy who was hunted down like a dog.”  The New York Slimes labels Zimmerman a “white Hispanic” reminiscent of the Nazi Mischling laws to deceitfully and demagogically insinuate “white” into the turbulent mix.  Obama donor Spike Lee posts the address of a terrorized elderly couple out of the belief that he’s sicking vigilantes on George Zimmerman.  The New Black Panthers - an organization that Obama refused to prosecute for obvious voter intimidation – posted a $10,000 “dead-or-alive” bounty on Zimmerman’s head.  And seven black teens comitted a racist hate crime in beating a Hispanic in an obvious act of racial vengeance.

Democrats pull this crap as a matter of routine: they take an event and just fill it up with lies in order to score political points on the basis of sheer demagoguery.  And usually by the time the media gets around to correcting the record with facts, Democrats have won a political victory and moved on to the next event to fill up with lies to score political points on the basis of sheer demagoguery.  Again and again they benefit from their lies in the short term and by the time the factual record emerges to expose them as liars the people are no longer paying attention.  While the nation teeters closer and closer to implosion and collapse.

For Democrats, “truth” is “racist.”  And so they despise the truth with a fanatical passion and declare total war to end truth in America once and for all.

All while the mainstream media has largely done everything they could to present every lie and cover-up every fact:

Race-baiting demagogue Jesse Jackson says that Trayvon Martin proves “blacks are under attack in America.”  And George Zimmerman proves that “Hispanics are under attack in America.”  By Democrat blacks.

The Real Picture Emerges Of A Dangerously Biased Propaganda-Mill Media In Trayvon Martin Shooting Case

March 28, 2012

Let’s take a look at the images the media has fed us:

Let’s meet the victim: a smiling twelve-year-old boy:

And let’s meet the shooter: he clearly just got out of jail from the last time he shot some unarmed little boy:

But here’s the thing: that twelve-year-old boy grew up into a 6’3″ thug the night George Zimmerman first laid eyes on Trayvon Martin:

And George Zimmerman is a man who cleaned up his act and became a professional:

Yes, haters; Fox News was the first to publish the recent photos that ought to be far and away the most relevant.  Liberal media refused to do so until long after that cat of truth was let out of the media bag.

Mad Jewess posted a collage of pictures to document the blatant media bias:

It’s blatant manipulation of the truth like this that makes a nice Jewish girl get “mad.”

This butchery – let’s use a favorite activity the left adores – this “abortion” of reality is THE activity of the mainstream media today.  It’s not enough to say that they refuse to provide the “true picture”; they actively seek to put out a FALSE picture of events in order to bias the thinking of people AGAINST the truth.

You can see why the left hates Fox News so much: you’ve got the entire mainstream media beaming lies into our minds; and all that propaganda gets routinely refuted by a news organization that is even willing to consider providing the “other picture” (i.e. the truth).

Fox News has FAR more liberal analysts and commentators on their programs (e.g., Juan Williams, Julian Epstein, Judith Miller, Lis Weihl, Bob Beckel, Kirsten Powers, Tamara Holder, Alan Combs, Mark LaMont Hill, Geraldo Rivera, Mara Liasson, Jane Hall and Neil Gabler are just a FEW of the liberals who are regularly on Fox News offering their opinions) than ANY other network – or even most of the networks combined – has conservatives.  So it’s not that Fox News in any way, shape or form suppresses the liberal view; it’s just that they go that one extra step that no other network will allow in which they allow THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PICTURE TO EMERGE.

The media provided a bogus account of Zimmerman as being “white.”  And when the truth came out that George Zimmerman is every bit as Hispanic as Barack Obama is black the New York Times literally coined a racial phrase to continue their fabricated narrative: a “white Hispanic” (March 22, 2o12, “City Criticizes Police Chief After Shooting” by New York Times writer Lizette Alvarez):

“Mr. Zimmerman, 28, a white Hispanic, told the police that he shot Trayvon in self-defense after an altercation. The teenager was walking home from a convenience store, where he bought iced tea and Skittles, when he was shot once in the chest.

Show me the number of times the New York Times had used such a modifier to describe Barack Obama (President Obama, a white African-American…).

This very literally hearkens back to the vile Mischling laws in which Nazis used race to target people who were “half Jew” or “quarter Jew,” etc.  And when I keep saying “liberals are racists,” I state it as a long-documented historical fact.

The mainstream media is so far into the tank for liberalism and for Obama that it rivals Joseph Goebbels being in the tank for Adolf Hitler.  Obama wants to demagogue racial tension – just take a look at Rep. Bobby Rush smuggling a “hoodie” onto the House Floor which specifically forbids headgear of any kind for a demonstration of that:

My slightly modified Bobby Rush quote: “Just because somebody dresses like a gangster thug does not make them a hoodlum.”

To show where the left is going on this, consider that Bobby Rush’s fellow Black Panthers have put a $10,000 contract out on Zimmerman’s head:

New Black Panther leader Mikhail Muhammad announced the reward during a protest in Sanford Saturday. And when asked whether he was inciting violence, Muhammad replied defiantly: “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.”

And Obama worshiper Spike Lee tried to finger George Zimmerman’s house so leftist vigilantes could murder him, only he fingered an elderly couple who have nothing to do with Zimmerman instead:

Elderly Couple In Fear Over Spike Lee Tweet
Star erroneously linked Floridians to man who killed Trayvon Martin

MARCH 27–With Twitter and Facebook continuing to explode with posts purporting to contain the address of George Zimmerman, property records and interviews reveal that the home is actually the longtime residence of a married Florida couple, both in their 70s, who have no connection to the man who killed Trayvon Martin and are now living in fear due to erroneous reports about their connection to the shooter.
 
The mass dissemination of the address on Edgewater Circle in Sanford–the Florida city where Martin was shot to death last month–took flight last Friday when director Spike Lee retweeted a tweet containing Zimmerman’s purported address to his 240,000 followers.
 
The original tweet was sent to Lee (and numerous other celebrities like Will Smith, 50 Cent, and LeBron James) last Friday afternoon by Marcus Davonne Higgins, a 33-year-old Los Angeles man who uses the online handle “maccapone.” Higgins included the direction, “EVERYBODY REPOST THIS.”

This is the same Spike Lee who is on the video record saying:

“It means that this is a whole new world. I think…I’ve been saying this before. You can divide history. BB Before Barack. AB After Barack.”

And history records that “AB” is a racist and race-baiting age of demagoguery and slander and lies and naked thug intimidation.

Barack Obama is unlikely to call this couple and apologize to them for the result of his racial exploitation of this case.  He is unlikely to call George Zimmerman and apologize that his words incited the Black Panthers to put a “dead or alive” bounty on Zimmerman’s head.  And the meainstream media has the same capacity for a guilty conscience that a killer shark has.

We now know that Trayvon Martin – whom according to Barack Obama looks exactly like his own son if he’d had one – looked exactly like a thug the night of the shooting.

Here’s Barack Obama’s son saluting America:

Such a darling little 6’3″ boy.  You can almost see that twelve-year-old boy emerge from the picture if you squint your eyes and try really hard to tune out the real world.

We know that the media deliberately decieved us on just about every detail possible as to what happened that night.  We know that eyewitness accounts have Trayvon Martin attacking George Zimmerman prior to Zimmerman drawing his weapon.  We know that George Zimmerman had clearly been beaten the night in question and ended up with a broken nose and an injury to the back of his head.  We know that George Zimmerman’s account has been substantiated by ALL of the direct evidence that has since emerged.  And we know that the mainstream media did everything it could to suppress that real picture and insert its own propaganda instead.

One verse from the Bible sums up the mainstream media:

The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness — Romans 1:18

The left is dishonest and depraved.  One day they will gladly take the mark of the beast and one day they will burn in hell forever and ever.  And at the lowest, hottest part of that hell will be the “journalists,” whose unending parade of lies paved the way to deception.

 

Obama Dives Into ‘Racist’ Trayvon Martin Shooting Case (Please Try To Remember That ‘Racist’ Shooter George Zimmerman Is Hispanic)

March 26, 2012

[Update 3/26/12] One of my good friends on this blog, HL, provides information in her comment that I did not know – such as the facts that the mainstream media have been streaming pictures of Trayvon Martin from when he was a twelve-year-old boy rather than recent pictures to create a false impression of “innocence,” and concealing facts about Trayvon Martin that indicate a propensity for violence.  In the same way, the media have deliberately demagogued Zimmerman’s 911 call to allege that he uttered a racial slur when there is no reason beyond their own biases to conclusively prove that he did.  Maybe he did use a racial slur, maybe he didn’t.  But even if he did use the slur, as offensive as such racism ought to be it still doesn’t in any way mean that Trayvon Martin did not attack Zimmerman as he claims (see below for more).

There are about 300 homicides a week in these United States of America.  The media only cares about an incredibly tiny cross-section of those tiny homicides, such as when a pretty little white girl is killed or when a black person is killed and it can at least be made to appear linked to racism.

More than nine out of every ten black people who are murdered in America are murdered by other black people -

The department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics report offers a snapshot of racial disparities among violent crime victims. Black people represented an estimated 13 percent of the U.S. population in 2005, the latest data available, but were the victims of 49 percent of all murders and 15 percent of rapes, assaults and other nonfatal violent crimes nationwide.

Most of the black murder victims — 93 percent — were killed by other black people, the study found.

- but covering all of those awful stories undermines the leftwing narrative, so let’s not trouble ourselves with all of those murder victims.  Let’s try to be like the liberal mainstream media and not give a damn about them.  Let’s try to think of murdered black people the way the left thinks of murdered black babies:

“Frankly I had thought that at that time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of” — 7/2/09 Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

And if black people are murdering black people in the womb and out of it in droves, try to think, you know, good liberal thoughts instead.

Just remember what the left said in the form of überliberal heroine Margaret Sanger:

We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the negro population.”

And try to remember that dead black people only count in liberalism if you can link the deaths to white racism. 

Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson swooped into this tragedy like the vultures they are so they could get in front of the cameras and racially demagogue and demonize they way only they can do.  This case was all about racism and it’s frankly racist to think it could even possibly be about anything other than racism (well, except how guns are evil and how any law that allows an ordinary American to be allowed to touch a gun is evil), we’re told.

For the record, a former NAACP leader denounced Sharpton and Jackson as the exploitative vultures that they are.   Good for him.  That’s what courage looks like.

And of course nobody mentions that George Zimmerman, the shooter, is Hispanic (i.e., is a member of an ethnic group that overwhelmingly votes Democrat) because that kind of information doesn’t suit the leftist mainstream media narrative.  He is every scintilla as Hispanic as our first black president is black.  Oh, and some of his relatives are even black -

“His father is white, neighbors say. His mother is Latina. And his family is eager to point out that some of his relatives are black.”

- But how often have you been told that little bit of trivia on MSNBC???

The shooter, George Zimmerman – and I remind you again for the record that said shooter is Hispanic and therefore a recognized member of the Democrat voting block - has been about as convicted as the mainstream media can convict somebody.  Well, him and “stand your ground” gun laws.  Because how dare an ordinary citizen believe he or she ought to have a right to stand his or her ground in America!!!

Nothing has been allowed to stand in the way of justice.  If the media has to bury certain facts and hype certain others, well, demagoguery is a small price to pay for lynch-mob justice.  Which is why this item hasn’t made the story lines on MSNBC, either:

Witness: Martin attacked Zimmerman
Updated: Friday, 23 Mar 2012, 6:19 PM EDT
Published : Friday, 23 Mar 2012, 5:47 PM EDT

ORLANDO – A witness we haven’t heard from before paints a much different picture than we’ve seen so far of what happened the night 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was shot and killed.
 
The night of that shooting, police say there was a witness who saw it all.
 
Our sister station, FOX 35 in Orlando, has spoken to that witness.
 
What Sanford Police investigators have in the folder, they put together on the killing of Trayvon Martin few know about.
 
The file now sits in the hands of the state attorney. Now that file is just weeks away from being opened to a grand jury.
 
It shows more now about why police believed that night that George Zimmerman shouldn’t have gone to jail.
 
Zimmerman called 911 and told dispatchers he was following a teen. The dispatcher told Zimmerman not to.
 
And from that moment to the shooting, details are few.
 
But one man’s testimony could be key for the police.
 
“The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911,” he said.
 
Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.
 
The witness only wanted to be identified as “John,” and didn’t not want to be shown on camera.
 
His statements to police were instrumental, because police backed up Zimmerman’s claims, saying those screams on the 911 call are those of Zimmerman.
 
“When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point,” John said.
 
Zimmerman says the shooting was self defense. According to information released on the Sanford city website, Zimmerman said he was going back to his SUV when he was attacked by the teen.
 
Sanford police say Zimmerman was bloody in his face and head, and the back of his shirt was wet and had grass stains, indicating a struggle took place before the shooting.

Not that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson give a damn about such information.  Any more than the racebaiting duo cared about the evidence that exonerated the Duke Lacrosse team.  You know, before the black woman who wrongfully accused them – with Al Sharpton’s and Jesse Jackson’s assistance – ended up murdering - you should have guessed it - a black man named Milton Walker.  Not that the 93% of black people who get murdered by other black people matter one tiny bit to the left, mind you.  Let’s not lose our focus on racism, by which I mean focusing on cases involving killers who can at least be made to appear more or less white.

So why did Barack Obama jump into this case?  Because he’s the exact same sort of racebaiting media whore that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are, that’s why.

We’ve got a couple little pieces of info on Obama’s taking that question from the press.  The New York Times writes:

The president often appears perturbed when he is asked off-topic questions at ceremonial events, but on Friday, he seemed eager to address the case, which has quickly developed into a cause célèbre around the country. He cautioned that his comments would be limited because the Justice Department was investigating. But he talked at length about his personal feelings about the case.

And we’re also told how the whole question was a fascist media set-up for a fascist media-hungry president:

pm317

@Admin A few minutes before the press conference began Josh Earnest of the press office approached the NBC JournoLister present and whispered something into his ear. The NBC JournoLister later asked Obama about Trayvon. Yes, we are implying this was a set up question designed to exploit the death of Trayvon Martin.

Aside from the fact that America used to have a quaint and bizarre notion that accused people were supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty – and Zimmerman may actually be innocent of everything but not having an adequately Hispanic-sounding surname – Obama’s assistance as “Demagogue-in-Chief” may very well be the thing that gets George Zimmerman off on this shooting.

Because how is George Zimmerman going to get a fair trial for shooting a young black man who “looks like Obama’s son” would have looked???

“But my main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

Have you ever heard of the legal term “mistrial”???  Apparently our Constitutional-Scholar-in-Chief hasn’t.

Not that it matters – because the New Black Panthers have Barack Obama’s back:

If you’ve been living in a cave: George Zimmerman is the guy who killed the young black kid Trayvon Martin. So forget the system — let’s kill him if necessary!

On Thursday, members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense circulated a “wanted dead or alive” poster for George Zimmerman over the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.

The posters were circulated during a press conference led by Minister Mikhail Muhummud, who said he is the southern regional director for the New Black Panther Party in Jacksonville, Florida.

You remember the New Black Panthers, right?  They’re the ones that got to intimidate white voters because that clearly isn’t a crime???  Barack Obama sure remembers them.

For what it’s worth, I have absolutely no idea what took place between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin. All I know is that it was a tragedy, and Trayvon Martin looked like a real nice kid with a big smile in the pictures I’ve seen of him. It sounds like Zimmerman was following Martin – quite possibly after he was told to stop – and that therefore this wasn’t a “stand your ground” case. It’s possible that this whole thing was a terrible misunderstanding, in which George Zimmerman was pursuing a suspicious black guy in a hoodie and Trayvon Martin was becoming increasingly paranoid about the Hispanic guy who clearly seemed to be stalking him. It’s quite possible that both young men actually thought they were legitimately defending themselves from the other man. All I know is that Obama didn’t help anybody but Obama by injecting himself into this case.  And all I know is that by attempting to transform this case into one about guns rather than about homicide, the left has turned it into a political football and undermined the justice process.

[Update, 3/26/12] I said immediately above that “Trayvon Martin looked like a real nice kid with a big smile in the pictures I’ve seen of him.”  What I didn’t know was that the mainstream media propaganda was playing a collage of pictures from when Trayvon Martin – who looked very different when George Zimmerman encountered him – was 12 years old.  I also didn’t know that the facts that we haven’t been given by the media paint a very different picture of this “kid” that begins with the fact that he had just been suspended from school for ten days for drug possession and was temporarily staying with his father:

Of course, this is why Trayvon was staying as his Father’s house, so far away from school. And it also explains why George Zimmerman, who by all accounts seemed to stay on top of everything that happened in his neighborhood, didn’t recognize him that evening, Trayvon didn’t really live there, and was only in town because of the suspension.

It seems we may not find out more anytime soon, as a lawyer representing Trayvon’s family has sealed his school records.

[...]

Even though Trayvon was only 17, he already was sporting gold teeth, and several large tattoos. This one was on his wrist, apparently of his girlfriend’s mother’s name.

[...]

It seems that Tray was also on Twitter, but his account seems to have been recently deleted by his family or friends.

His screen name was “@NO_LIMIT_NIGGA, as you can see from the twitpic account screenshot above. He was also a member of a twitter hash group #team4dat.

At first, I was skeptical that anyone would maintain an account with that sort of derogatory slur in the title, but after doing some research, it’s apparent that it was Trayvon’s account.

[...]

There seem to be several allusions to violence on Tray’s Twitter account.

Oh, and Trayvon Martin’s suspension from school also possession of stolen jewelry as well as possession of a burglary tool.

THAT’S the 6’3″ “kid” the 5’9″ Zimmerman encountered the night of the shooting.

And Barack Obama and the mainstream media propaganda are doing absolutely everything they each can to poison the justice process so they can convict a “racist” “white” guy who is really Hispanic out of their larger goal to convict guns in the hands of American citizens.

It very much sounds like Trayvon Martin was growing into a brutal thug.  And I think about that thug when I contemplate Chicago-style thug Obama saying, “If I had a son, he would have looked like Trayvon.”  It sounds a lot more true now than it did before, knowing what I’ve learned about Trayvon Martin and knowing what I’ve sadly experienced in Barack Obama.

[End update].

This country is such a mess it is absolutely unreal.  And when you’ve got a president interfering in a state case that’s already being interfered with more than quite enough as it is instead of doing his job keeping Iran from getting nukes and causing Armageddon, or maybe keeping gas from getting to $5 a gallon, you can understand why.

ObamaCare Is A Two-Year-Old Bastard Child – And Barack Obama Is A Deadbeat Daddy Desperately Trying To Avoid Taking Responsibility For His Son

March 23, 2012

It’s interesting how Obama – who supposedly hates impromptu questions from the press – answered a question about the  Trayvon Martin slaying.

Of course, it turned out that the question was only one more example of a fascist Obama fascistically controlling his fascist leftwing media:

pm317

@Admin A few minutes before the press conference began Josh Earnest of the press office approached the NBC JournoLister present and whispered something into his ear. The NBC JournoLister later asked Obama about Trayvon. Yes, we are implying this was a set up question designed to exploit the death of Trayvon Martin.

Anyway, in spite of the whole “fascist-president-handing-his-fawning-propaganda-the-questions-he-wants-to-answer” thing, it was what Obama said about Trayvon Martin that was fascinating:

“When I think of this boy, I think about my own kids,” Obama said. “I can only imagine what his parents are going through. … If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

It’s fascinating because Obama actually does have a son who turned two years old today – and he’s running from that kid as if it had flesh-eating disease:

March 21, 2012 4:00 A.M.
Obamacare, Two Years Later It’s still a failure.
By Michael Tanner

This week marks two years since of the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and if the Obama administration has chosen to all but ignore the second anniversary of Obamacare, the rest of us should pause and reflect on just what a monumental failure of policy the health-care-reform law has been.
 
What’s more, it has been a failure on its own terms. After all, when health-care reform was passed, we were promised that it would do three things: 1) provide health-insurance coverage for all Americans; 2) reduce insurance costs for individuals, businesses, and government; and 3) increase the quality of health care and the value received for each dollar of health-care spending. At the same time, the president and the law’s supporters in Congress promised that the legislation would not increase the federal-budget deficit or unduly burden the economy. And it would do all these things while letting those of us who were happy with our current health insurance keep it unchanged. Two years in, we can see that none of these things is true.

For example, we now know that, contrary to claims made when the bill passed, the law will not come close to achieving universal coverage. In fact, as time goes by, it looks as if the bill will cover fewer and fewer people than advertised. According to a report from the Congressional Budget Office released last week, Obamacare will leave 27 million Americans uninsured by 2022. This represents an increase of 2–4 million uninsured over previous reports. Moreover, it should be noted that, of the 23 million Americans who will gain coverage under Obamacare, 17 million will not be covered by real insurance, but will simply be dumped into the Medicaid system, with all its problems of access and quality. Thus, only about 20 million Americans will receive actual insurance coverage under Obamacare. That’s certainly an improvement over the status quo, but it’s also a far cry from universal coverage — and not much bang for the buck, given Obamacare’s ever-rising cost.
 
At the same time, the legislation is a major failure when it comes to controlling costs. While we were once told that health-care reform would “bend the cost curve down,” we now know that Obamacare will actually increase U.S. health-care spending. This should come as no surprise: If you are going to provide more benefits to more people, it is going to cost you more money. The law contained few efforts to actually contain health-care costs, and the CBO now reports that many of the programs it did contain, such as disease management and care coordination, will not actually reduce costs. As the CBO noted, “in nearly every program involving disease management and care coordination, spending was either unchanged or increased relative to the spending that would have occurred in the absence of the program, when the fees paid to the participating organization were considered.”
 
This failure to control costs means that the law will add significantly to the already-crushing burden of government spending, taxes, and debt. According to the CBO, Obamacare will cost $1.76 trillion by 2022. To be fair, some media outlets misreported this new estimate as a doubling of the law’s originally estimated cost of $940 billion. In reality, most of the increased cost estimate is the result, not of increased programmatic costs, but of an extra two years of implementation. Still, many observers warned at the time that the original $940 million estimate was misleading because it included only six years of actual expenditures, with the ten-year budget window. The new estimate is, therefore, a more accurate measure of how expensive this law will be. Yet even this estimate covers only eight years of implementation. And it leaves out more than $115 billion in important implementation costs, as well as costs of the so-called doc fix. It also double-counts Social Security taxes and Medicare savings. Some studies suggest a better estimate of Obamacare’s real ten-year cost could run as high as $2.7–3 trillion. And this does not even include the over $4.3 trillion in costs shifted to businesses, individuals, and state governments.

All this spending means that we will pay much more in debt and taxes. But we will also pay more in insurance premiums. Once upon a time, the president promised us that health-care reform would lower our insurance premiums by $2,500 per year. That claim has long since been abandoned. Insurance premiums are continuing to rise at record rates. And, while there are many factors driving premiums up, Obamacare itself is one of them. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, insurance premiums had been rising at roughly 5 percent per year pre-Obamacare. That jumped to 9 percent last year. And roughly half that four-percentage-point increase can be directly attributed to Obamacare. Even Jonathan Gruber of MIT, one of the architects of both Obamacare and Romneycare, now admits that many individuals will end up paying more for insurance than they would have without the reform — even after taking into account government subsidies — and that those increases will be substantial. According to Gruber, “after the application of tax subsidies, 59 percent of the individual market will experience an average premium increase of 31 percent.”

Finally, if the past two years should have taught us anything, it is that we may not be able to keep our current insurance, even if we are happy with it. The CBO suggests that as many as 20 million workers could lose their employer-provided health insurance as a result of Obamacare. Instead, they will be dumped into government-run insurance exchanges. And, the recent dust-up over insurance coverage for contraceptives is a clear illustration of how the government will now be designing insurance plans for all of us. Regardless of how one feels about the contraceptive mandate itself, it is just the tip of the iceberg as government mandates tell employers what insurance they must provide, and tell us what insurance we must buy, even if that insurance is more expensive, contains benefits we don’t want, or violates our consciences.
 
Next week, Obamacare will slouch its way to the Supreme Court. How the justices decide will be based on questions of constitutional law. Their decision will set a crucial precedent in setting the boundaries between government power and individual rights. But regardless of whether the Court upholds Obamacare or strikes it down, in whole or in part, we should understand that, simply as a matter of health-care reform, Obamacare is a costly and dangerous failure.
 
— Michael Tanner is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and the author of Leviathan on the Right: How Big-Government Conservatism Brought Down the Republican Revolution.

ObamaCare costs are soaring out of control after all of Obama’s lying promises.  And now he’s walking away from this “baby” like a daddy who had his fun but has to move on to another momma to use and abuse and leave high and dry.

Here’s an article that sums up this birthday of the ObamaCare Obamination quite well while managing to capture the sheer-chutzpah-hypocrisy that is Obama:

Obamination Anniversary: Corpse Of Trayvon Martin Abused By Barack Obama To Hide From Heathcare Scam Anniversary

Today is the second year anniversary of the horrid and hated Obama heath scam passage into law. Did Barack Obama celebrate and trumpet his singular “achievement”? No. Barack Obama chose instead to mutilate the corpse of Trayvon Martin by saying that kid resembles him. What an insult to the dead!

This miserable creature called Barack Obama is without shame. The Associated Press wrote last week about Obama’s use of his daughters for political gain:

“He’s cited Sasha and Malia, now 10 and 13, in discussing everything from the rescue of an American aid worker from Somali pirates to the touchy subject of public access to emergency contraception. His daughters also are prominent in a family photo being used by his re-election campaign. [snip]

Obama said at a news conference that he’d called Fluke after Limbaugh made his comments “because I thought about Malia and Sasha, and one of the things I want them to do as they get older is to engage in issues they care about, even ones I may not agree with them on. I want them to be able to speak their mind in a civil and thoughtful way, and I don‘t want them attacked or called horrible names because they’re good citizens.”

Invoking his daughters is a way for Obama to bring big issues down to human scale, in a disarming way. It also is a reminder to Americans of the president’s photogenic family, a priceless political asset in an election year.

The Obamas can be fiercely protective of their daughters’ privacy in some ways, complaining if the girls are photographed while out on their own, for example. But they’ve been more than willing to keep bringing them up in the national conversation and to keep them in the minds of voters as the general election approaches.”

This past week most Big Media news organizations actually removed news stories already published about an Obama daughter traipsing off to a Mexico vacation, earthquake included. So Obama exploits the daughters and Big Media scrubs references to them that do not flatter Barack Obama.

Exploitation of his daughters (is this “pimping” your daughters? as Obama lovin’ and protectin’ MSNBC once accused Hillary Clinton of doing?) apparently is not enough. Now Obama is entering the various realms of necrophilia as he exploits the dead Trayvon Martin.

Today, Barack Obama weighed in on the Trayvon Martin case. “If I had a son he’d look like Trayvon” Obama said. It’s always about Barack to Barack.

Barack started his statement by noting he is the head of the Executive branch of government. It’s always about Barack. Then Barack proceeded to exploit the death of Trayvon. It should be noted that the Obama White House spokesmen have not commented all week on the Trayvon Martin case. [That might have been a smarter policy because the attempts to make this shooting a "racist" case (or as Geraldo does, blame the hoodie) might face some difficulty as the shooter is a Latino who comes from a multi-racial family and the facts on the case as presented by Big Media reports conflict with statements from the Latino Zimmerman family.]

A few minutes before the press conference began Josh Earnest of the press office approached the NBC JournoLister present and whispered something into his ear. The NBC JournoLister later asked Obama about Trayvon. Yes, we are implying this was a set up question designed to exploit the death of Trayvon Martin. It was the race card with a personal twist from a twisted personality that “occupies” the White House as if it were Zoo-cotti Park.

Why did Obama posthumously adopt Trayvon Martin? It’s a Friday adoption to make Americans forget about the Obamination Anniversary:

“Friday marked the second year anniversary of the passage of President Barack Obama’s controversial healthcare law referred to by many as “Obamacare.”

Next week, the law goes before the U.S. Supreme Court, which will hear arguments on whether the law violates the Constitution.

One of the major sticking points to Obama’s contentious healthcare overhaul is the requirement that all Americans must buy health insurance by 2014 or pay a penalty.

Recent polls show three out of every five Americans oppose that mandate.

The White House was noticeably silent on the law’s two-year anniversary.

The Supreme Court takes up the law Monday to hear arguments on whether it’s constitutional.”

Two years ago Joe Biden said it was a “big f*cking deal”. Now it is without doubt a big f*cking disaster and Trayvon Martin will be hoist onto an Al Sharpton flatbed truck for an Obama adoption ceremony in order to avoid the “big f*cking disaster” getting discussed.

Today in a typically biased-towards-Obama article, Politico states those assumptions by Democrats on Obamacare were way off. Politico JournoListers did everything they could to help Obama pass his health scam two years ago and now even they have to admit we were right and they were wrong. Big f*cking wrong.

Barack Obama wants to posthumously adopt Trayvon Martin as his own today rather than discuss his own soon to be dead ultimate “achievement”. Others are not ignoring the Obamination Anniversary. Some are marking Obamacare’s Anniversary:

“On Wednesday, The Hill reported that Barack Obama wouldn’t do anything to celebrate the two-year anniversary of ObamaCare, his signature legislative achievement. That might have to do with the fact that a majority of voters wants it repealed, and even a plurality of Democrats (48%) want it rolled back in whole or in part. Still, just because Obama wants to be a party pooper doesn’t mean that others aren’t celebrating. The RNC, for instance, has this brief spot called “ObamaCare’s Lonely Birthday,” but which could also be titled, “It’s My Party and I’ll Cry If I Want To”:

 The Barack Obama lies on his signature Obamination are coming home to roost. The “cost curve” has not been bent downwards, as promised. Prices are soaring.

 Next week the Supreme Court will begin its review of the Obamination. Barack Obama did not want to spend the Friday before that review begins on Monday engaged in a public discussion of how hated the Obamination is. That’s why Obama dredged up the body of Trayvon Martin today.

Shame on you, Barry Hussein, for fathering a huge boondoggle trillion dollar a year baby and then pretending you don’t even know it.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 530 other followers