If Roseanne Barr’s ‘Apes’ Tweet Was Racist, Then Samantha Bee’s ‘C-Word’ Was Hateful To All Women, But Double Standard ALWAYS Applies

June 1, 2018

I’ll make my point right here, if it wasn’t already crystal-clear enough in my title: if Roseanne Barr’s tweet about Valerie Jarrett being the baby resulting from the Muslim Brotherhood and Planet of the Apes was “racist” and an attack against all people of color, then Samantha Bee’s CBS network-aired spewage about the President of the United States’ daughter being a “feckless cunt” is misogynistic and an attack against all women,  And CBS is misogynistic and hateful to women for not having already fired her.  It is as simple as that.

So Roseanne Barr makes a stupid, and yeah, frankly racist comment about former top Obama advisor Valerie Jarrett.  Among the many reasons it was just beyond stupid is that Roseanne Barr frankly shouldn’t be throwing stones in glass houses when it comes to how other women look.  I also must personally confess that I remember finding “Dr. Zira” strangely attractive when I first saw her in the original movie.  But that’s another story.

And then, immediately after ABC proved it has a zero-tolerance attitude for anyone who could be perceived as a Republican saying anything nasty, Samantha Bee had this to say in viciously attacking President Trump’s daughter:

CBS rightly took some responsibility for the comment, because the word appeared on their network show which is NOT broadcast live.  Which means the entire network actively participated in Samantha Bee’s vile comment.  Whereas while the left and their many allies masquerading as “journalists” tried to make it appear – fake-news-style- that Donald Trump was to blame.  When in actuality it was only Roseanne and her Ambien, or whatever she was on.

It doesn’t bother me that Roseanne was fired.  Yeah, what she said was beneath contempt.

What bothers me is to be a liberal is to be a pathological hypocrite.  And progressive liberals are now every bit as much the combination of self-righteousness and hypocrisy as the Pharisees and Sadducees of Jesus’ day ever were.

In addition to Samantha Bee, who said something on a network and directly involved her network when Roseanne Barr did no such thing, we also have a Democrat  named Dan Helmer who is running an ad on these same self-righteous television networks that directly compares the President of the United States to Osama bin Laden.  Now, what makes that funny in a pathologically self-righteous hypocrite sort of way, is that Roseanne Barr’s exact tweet was, “muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj.”  And so we literally just had a trifecta of hypocrisy: Bee’s “cunt” remark is FAR more hateful than Barr’s “planet” remark; Dan Helmer’s “Osama bin Laden” ad was far more beyond the pale than Barr’s “Muslim Brotherhood” was; and Valerie Jarrett actually went to CBS which hosts Bee and participated in “cunts” to pontificate about Roseanne Barr’s unacceptable words.

But keep in mind, the same damn Disney which through ABC which oh-so self-righteously immediately fired Roseanne Barr has in its employ a vile roach turd named Keith Olbermann.  And he’s got his job.  And if these liberal progressive networks fire an Olbermann for hate, you can bet they will quickly rehire them.  Which they will never do to anyone who could be positively connected to Donald Trump.  Let’s go down memory lane and hear what a liberal progressive can spew and remain on the damn air.  And the same Disney that so quickly raced to fire Barr actually hired Olbermann POST-hateful spewage.  And yeah, Olbermann has also spewed hatred for women.  But that’s fine.

We’ve got Kathy Griffen rescinding her non-apology after doing a photo of herself holding an incredibly lifelike severed head of the President of the United States.  And amazingly in terms of self-righteous hypocrisy, she rescinded her so-called apology on an ABC program.  Somehow, I don’t think that taking back of an apology that was never sincere to begin with would have been quite so-okay had Roseanne Barr did the same ugly thing a few years ago with Barack Obama’s gory, severed head.  Any more than it would have been okay for Barr to hatefully attack – and even using the word “cunt” – against Obama’s daughter.

I haven’t forgotten what the so-called “journalists” did at their White House Press Correspondents gala through their vile mouthpiece Michelle Wolf.

A matter of days ago, the left was aghast and appalled and oh-so righteously outraged when pictures of the federal government holding illegal immigrant children in CAGES (like animals!!!).  But just one small detail: it was OBAMA who did it and the left had to go to photos depicting Obama hatred for immigrants to fake-news frame Donald Trump:

President Trump on Tuesday slammed Democrats who shared pictures of child migrants sleeping in cages to knock his immigration policies, only to backtrack after realizing the photos were taken during the Obama administration.
“Democrats mistakenly tweet 2014 pictures from Obama’s term showing children from the Border in steel cages,” Trump tweeted. “They thought it was recent pictures in order to make us look bad, but backfires.”

One photo of children in a cell was shared numerous times over the weekend amid outrage over Trump administration policies of separating illegal immigrant parents from their children at the southern border.

Trump opponents who shared the photo included activists, journalists and former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau, who said: “This is happening right now, and the only debate that matters is how we force our government to get these kids back to their families as fast as humanly possible.”

Tucker Carlson ran a beautiful segment about how the progressive left incredibly hypocritically kowtows to human-rights abusing China.  When it comes to human rights, human freedom and human dignity, China is the greatest monster in the history of the world, but ALL the liberal progressive communications entities literally aid and abet China in its destruction of the human soul as a matter of routine.  And it’s easy to document:

This is the same regime from the Great Leap forward, the Cultural Revolution, the Tiananmen Square Massacre.  China now has a monster-dictator for life with even more power to unleash evil against humankind than Mao had.  But hey, this monster is willing to give liberal progressives lucrative access to the Chinese communist market, so no big deal.

The left doesn’t care about humanity or human decency.  These people stand for nothing.  They don’t care about black people.  They don’t care about women.  They don’t care about illegal immigrants.  They don’t care about anyone but themselves.  They never have stood for anything but themselves.  And everything has always been nothing more than an ends-justifies-the-means means to and end to these people whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.

It’s hard for me to get too angry or upset about Roseanne’s racism when it’s so easy to demonstrate that the people who are the most “outraged” by it are themselves incapable of decency, or integrity, or honesty, or virtue of any kind.  It’s nothing but a game.  And in this game the progressive left constantly moves the goal posts and controls all the referees.  And when I condemn a Roseanne Barr, I am merely playing the game on their terms, because they will never condemn in the same manner their Samantha Bees, their Keith Olbermann’s, their Kathy Griffens, their Michelle Wolfs.  I merely participate with them in destroying my players, but they will never participate in any way, shape or form in destroying their players.

We stand for what’s right.  But the left will NEVER stand for what is right.

The Word of God prophetically described these people and this end-times generation that would be both hateful and lawless just before the coming of the beast whom they will worship because they are evil.  And here we are.

Advertisements

Roseanne Barr Entirely Correct In Her Thesis Against Liberalism: ‘I’m still the same. You all moved! You all went so f–king far out…’

March 30, 2018

So Roseanne Barr is back, and appeared on Jimmy Kimmel to promote the return of her show after 20 years off the air.  That first episode was watched by more than 18 million people, simply giant ratings numbers.  Frankly, if the mainstream media networks had any honesty or integrity or virtue whatsoever, they would be promoting programs like this.  Instead, they in Stalinist style destroy such programs, the way they did when they killed Tim Allen’s Last Man Standing in spite of the fact that the show was a solid performer with superior ratings over programs the network keptincluding leftist political programs such as “Black-ish.”

Anyway, when Barr appeared on leftist-whackjobber Jimmy Kimmel’s show, this exchange took place:

“I am shocked because I know you are a socially liberal person in general,” Kimmel said.

“I’m still the same! You all moved,” she said.

“We did?” Kimmel asked.

“You all went so fucking far out you lost everybody,” Barr said.

“You’re probably right, by the way,” Kimmel reacted.

“Seriously, a lot of your audience, and including me — I just want to say this, a lot of this, no matter who we voted for we don’t want to see our president fail, you know?” she said to tepid applause.

“You want Pence for the freakin’ president?” she asked Kimmel

“No,” he said.

“Well then zip that fucking lip,” she told him.

That is exactly right, and it is what is most disastrously and dangerously wrong with liberalism and with the Democratic Party that is now owned lock, stock and barrel by the most radical ideologues.  Stop and think about Roseanne Barr’s last obviously true point: if you get rid of Trump, do you know who you’ll be calling “Mister President”????  The arch-conservative Mike Pence, that’s who.  But the left is so animalistic, if not bug-like, in it’s roach-hate that it is incapable of any manner of introspection whatsoever, and so, in wild, rabid contradiction to their own interests, they are trying to do everything imaginable to impeach and boot the non-ideological Donald Trump as president and thereby install Mike Pence who would not only be able to carry Trump voters, but get the mainstream conservatives behind him as well and guarantee a Republican victory in 2020.  Or, in other words, no thinking liberal would want Mike Pence as president; but the only problem is that there is no such THING as a “thinking liberal.”  Such creatures went extinct quite a while ago, as I can continue to prove and document.

Hey, for instance, remember just a couple presidents back, when Bill Clinton’s central message that won him the White House was “It’s the economy stupid”?  Remember that???  I mean, jobless claims have fallen to the lowest level since January 27, 1973African-American unemployment under Trump has hit the lowest rate in American historyConsumer confidence under Trump is at a 17-year high, meaning that Barack Obama never saw such great numbers.  It gets even worse for Obama, because consumer confidence throughout Obama’s entire presidency was NEGATIVE: Americans’ confidence in the economy soared 16 points during Trump’s first year in office, reaching positive territory for the first time since Gallup began tracking it in 2008.  We can go on and on with positive economic numbers.  Keep in mind, the left predicted ECONOMIC DOOM when Trump was elected; the very fact that Obama is whining to receive credit for Trump’s astonishing success is itself fantastic proof that Trump has been an awesome force for the US economy.  But Democrats not only rabidly and dishonestly refuse to give Trump credit, they don’t even give a flying damn about the awesome economy.  As Roseanne Barr points out; they want Trump to fail and they literally want America under Trump’s presidency to fail.

Here’s another example, just from the last couple days:

Forget MAGA: Trump Made America’s Oldest Gun Company Go Bankrupt
By John Bonazzo • 03/26/18 12:11pm

MAGA may actually mean Making America Gun-Free Again.
Remington was once among the nation’s largest gun and ammunition makers – it was founded in 1816, when there were only 19 U.S. states. But due to sliding sales and mounting debt, the company announced over the weekend that it was filing for bankruptcy. […]

One of the main reasons for the sales downturn was ironically the election of President Donald Trump. During his campaign, Trump claimed that “Hillary Clinton wants to take your guns away and she wants to abolish the Second Amendment.”

As such, gun enthusiasts began stockpiling rifles in fear of a Clinton victory. But after Trump won, sales cooled—consumers likely thought a president who was endorsed by the National Rifle Association wouldn’t infringe on their rights.

So Remington, expecting a Hillary win because that’s what everybody from the damn fake news mainstream media assured us was going to happen, gambled huge on a Clinton gun-grabber win and massively ramped up production so panicked citizens could buy guns while America was still America and we still had a viable Constitution and people still had rights in this country.  But instead Donald Trump – contrary to all the egghead liberals who were wrong and have been wrong every damn since – won.  And comforted people relaxed and didn’t buy all the guns Remington expected them to buy.  And now they had all this inventory on hand that they suddenly couldn’t sell.  Because it turns out that most Americans don’t necessarily want to have a gun; they just want to be able to buy one if they believe they need it.  And that the last thing they want is a fascist gun-grabber who does what ALL fascist totalitarians have done throughout history and strips the people of their right to defend themselves from tyranny so of course tyranny can reign supreme.

It is simply a fact that no rational intellect can dispute: Barack Hussein Obama did more for gun sales than any American president in the entire history of the republic.

Let’s consider something called “reality”:

President Barack Obama has glibly been awarded the title of the World’s Greatest Guns Salesman during his seven years in office, and it appears that his eighth and final year will be his most successful ever.

According to the FBI, the NICS background check system, which serves as a proxy for gun sales, reported 1,870,000 background checks in the month of May, the highest in recorded history and enough to re-equip the entire United States military. That is 290,000 more background checks than last May, 440,000 more than May of 2014, and 850,000 less than Obama’s first May in office in 2009.

Americans Have Bought Over 100 Million Guns During Obama’s Presidency (as of December 9, 2015).  Obama grew the gun industry by more than 158% as of April 2016In other words, if there existed a liberal or a Democrat who was not pathologically insane, no one who actually wanted fewer guns in America would have voted for Obama.

Again, the problem is that there is no such thing as a liberal or Democrat who is not pathologically insane.  They all went extinct, killed off by their own rabid, hysterical batpoop craziness.

Liberals went too far.  WAY too far.  And because they rabidly abandoned the Imago Dei, the image of God, they became mindless roaches and mindlessly created the exact opposite state of affairs that they would have wanted if they just had functioning humanity within them.

What’s truly hilarious is that, even as Obama tried to erode and destroy the American people’s right to keep and bear arms, this fascist rat-bastard hypocrite roach was brokering more arms deals than ANY president since World War II.  Because this fascist fool was FINE with Muslims having weapons; just not Americans.  The fact of the matter is that Obama was such a wicked arms dealer that his arms sales actually MORE THAN DOUBLED the hated George W. Bush’s.

Which is to say that there is going to be a very special place at the very bottom of hell for Barack Obama.  This piece of filth was truly a monster – especially by the left’s own rhetoric.

And the left would truly despise this hypocrite fascist: IF there existed such a thing as a liberal capable of moral consistency, that is.  But the last liberal capable of moral consistency faded away into extinction long ago and it is highly unlikely that the magic force of unicorn fairy-dust evolution will be able to produce another such creature ever again.

Liberal, Democrat-appointed Supreme Court Justice (retired) John Paul Stevens just publicly came out demanding a repeal of the 2nd Amendment and I demand a litmus test for any candidate for president swear that they will never appoint such a Justice.  But as I’m going to show you below, to be a Democrat is to be a lying swindling hypocrite who plays word-games with reality and with the truth and who cannot be trusted in anything whatsoever.  So these lying weasels will smugly declared, “Oh, I’m not in favor of doing the thing that I actually am totally in favor of doing.”  They’ll play the imbecilic game that the 2nd Amendment was written at a time when all we had were muskets, and so all we’re allowed is muskets.  Okay, fine, you hypocrite Luddite frauds, we’re also not allowed telephones or televisions or automobiles or computers or phones or damn near anything else we didn’t have back in 1787.  And to make it even crazier, the Constitution doesn’t guarantee the right to ANY of the things but it DOES guarantee “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.”

I must point out a previous article I wrote and it’s title:

The Legacy Of Barack Obama And The Democrat Party Can Be Summed Up In Four Words: ‘President Donald John Trump’

And way, way back in May of 2012 I predicted that there would be a giant backlash due to Barack Obama’s rabidly fascist policies that no liberal saw as anything other than mainstream and wonderful because they are such deluded, pathologically fascist narcissists:

Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit.  Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.

What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States.  And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions.  You mark my words.  Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification???  Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage.  You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching.  And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame.My words on June 18, 2012

Obama gave us Trump.  Now the left wants to take Trump back and give us Pence instead.  So they can go even more rabid with frothing hate while demonically and hypocritically calling themselves the party of “tolerance.”  What the hell kind of “tolerance” do these whackjob hypocrites have????  We can literally win a national election and STILL be dismissed in terms of the most stupid, most deluded, most absurd strawman in the leftist arsenal.  If my point of view isn’t valid after a national election victory, then please explain to me why I ought to even remotely consider ANY point of view that you clowns offer.

I suppose I simply could have said what Roseanne Barr said to Jimmy Kimmel: the left went too damn far.  So damn far it was beyond UNREAL.

It is an amazing thing to view the sheer number of policies that the left now screams are the most evil things in existence that they themselves were declaring just a few years ago: whether it was on abortion, or on illegal immigration, or on homosexuality and marriage.

Consider that in 2008 BOTH political parties agreed on a moral fact of human existence:

Barack Obama in 2008:

REV. WARREN: Define marriage.

SEN. OBAMA: I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. (Applause.) Now, for me as a Christian, it’s also a sacred union. You know, God’s in the mix. (Applause.)

But one political party was pathologically dishonest and lied and reneged on what it claimed so it could “fundamentally transform” what it had previously claim was the truth.

Barack Obama claimed that marriage was between one man and one woman and that he wasn’t for gay marriage “as a Christian.”  As a Christian, the Democratic Party will burn in hell forever and ever and ever according to these words that they falsely claimed they believed.  Because to be a Democrat is to be a demon-possessed lying hypocrite pathologically incapable of honesty or integrity or decency or virtue or any other good thing.

Or go back down memory lane to when the Democratic Party gave Democratic President Bill Clinton a standing ovation for these words:

PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON: “All Americans, not only in the States most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country.

The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers.

That’s why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens.

In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace…

We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.” (Bill Clinton, Remarks At State Of The Union, Washington, D.C., 1/24/95)

There is simply no question whatsoever that the Democratic Party of today stands condemned as the most vile kind of traitorous vermin as rightly judged by the Democratic Party of 1995.  Working class Americans realized Obama and the Democrats were literally at WAR with them, literally intentionally giving illegal immigrants their jobs and devaluing their work if they did have jobs because of the millions of people Democrats had artificially added to the labor force competition through illegal immigration.  But Democrats don’t give a flying damn about working class Americans; they need voters.  And they’re fine illegally importing foreigners to cynically get what they cynically want.

I could go on and on about all the stuff that Democrats used to acknowledge as simply true facts but now rabidly despises as worse than the Nazis.  It’s remarkable how these fools’ heads don’t explode from trying to contain all the contradictions.  I mean, we have the new “Me Too” movement and oh, are they ever trying to give Trump hell about alleged affairs that the so-called “victims” themselves claim were entirely consensual.  Let’s forget about the legitimate allegations of rape, of overt sexual harassment, that Bill Clinton was guilty of.

George Stephanopoulos is the honored, esteemed anchor of ABC News.  Let’s go back down memory lane of George overtly threatening a journalist – oh, and a female journalist at that – who had uncovered numerous women who were claiming that not only had they had sex with Bill Clinton, but in some cases he’d even fathered their babies.  Let’s watch this living emobiement of the fact that to be a liberal is to be a pathological hypocrite in every imaginable way possible:

Why are you hypocrite fools so self-righteously coming out against Donald Trump’s lawyer for doing anything to contain any allegations of ANYTHING or allegedly making any kind of a threat to anyone to stop reporting anything?  When there’s this giant log named George Stephanopoulos and basically the entire Democratic Party of just a few years ago blocking your damn view of the speck in Donald Trump’s eye???

We can talk about Russia.  Remember how Obama told the Russian president that “After my election I have more flexibility”????  Obama bent over so Putin could sodomize this country.  It was during OBAMA’s wicked presidency that Russia played whatever election games it played while a weak, passive, cowardly fool Obama did NOTHING.  Remember when Obama arrogantly lectured Mitt Romney that “The 1980s are calling and they want their foreign policy back”???  Remember that???  And now hysterical Democrats in screaming about Russia are implicitly acknowledging what a demon-possessed moron Barack Obama was throughout his failed presidency.  The actual fact is that Russians DID collude massively; but they colluded with DEMOCRATS.  And Democrats’ very hypocritical act of screaming about Trump has itself been a massive gift of collusion with Russia and Putin.

With that said, let’s talk about Hillary.  Let’s first point out that Hillary Clinton, in all of her damn demagoguery over the so-called supposed “pay gap” between men and women actually HERSELF paid her female staffers less than she paid her male staffersAnd if that isn’t enough, the Clinton Foundation itself had a massive pay gap.  So the last person you’d want representing women on this statistic alone would be Hillary Clinton.  Just saying.

Keep in mind, this election was a bipolar choice between Hillary or Donald Trump.  People chose.  And married women, and in particular white married women, chose for Donald Trump over Hillary.  Why did they do that???

Hillary Clinton told the world this:

“[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”

Which is to say that women are strong, tough and decisive.  But of course, simultaneously, they are weak, pathetic and think whatever thought they are allowed to think if and only if their husbands give them permission.  Now, proceeding from Hillary’s rationale (as a white woman), she would had she been elected president only done what her husband told her to do.  But her husband is a rapist and serial sexual predator.

I hope you see the sheer ridiculousness of this idiocy.  But Hillary Clinton in mutual contradiction ran her campaign carpetbagging simultaneously on her husband’s coattails and on the mantras of feminism both at the same time.  And also in mutual contradiction, she was this strong, tough, decisive woman whenever it suited her; but every time she was criticized she instantaneously transformed into a helpless victim.  And that is exactly how feminism itself works: they are mutual exclusively self-referentially contradictory things at the same time.

This capacity to say things and believe things that simply fly in the face of any and all credibility should help inform you to try to comprehend how anyone could believe what follows:

When it comes to the craziest example of whackjob, pathological liberal moral insanity, I saved the very best for last.  I had to create a transcript of Tucker Carlson’s interview with University of Toronto psychology professor, Jordan Peterson.  He offered this in response to the now at least 71 different “gender options” we supposedly now have:

The radical left insists that gender is a social construct and that’s just simply not true. So the scientific data on that are absolutely crystal clear. No reasonable scientist disagrees. And so they’re all foaming at the mouth because I’m poking holes in their cherished notions. And they like to think that people are completely malleable because that means that people can be made over in their ideological image.

Peterson points out that his views are “more common than you think,” stating that “My views on gender are shared widely in the personality community. Anyone who understands personality and is a credible scientist knows the difference between men and women in personality should be contributed primarily to biological factors. This isn’t contentious. The only people its’ contentious around are gender ideologues. They’ve already lost the scientific battle, so they’re taking it to the legislative front to enforce their views. So, they’re really not contentious viewpoints, they’re mainstream science. And we’re criticized all the time for spouting pseudo-science. It’s not pseudo-science; it’s mainstream science. And people who know the literature aren’t disputing this: it’s been known at least since the 1990s.

The Canadian government built a social-constructivist view of gender into the law. And that’s just incorrect. The idea that biological sex, gender expression, gender identity and sexual preference have no relationship to one another, that they vary independently, there’s almost nothing you can claim that’s more false than that. But now it’s being written into the law. It’s just patently absurd. It’s actually a telling commentary on the state of political discourse across the West, that something like that can actually happen. But I think that it’s equality of outcome that’s the real pathological desire. That’s the bad one.

Well then, Tucker asked, why are people whose views are not rooted in science, but instead in emotion and superstition, dominating our public conversation, and punishing anyone who doesn’t disagree? How did they get so much power?

Look, I actually think there’s a technical reason for that. It’s obvious that things can go too far on the right and they can go too far on the left. And it’s kind of easy to put a box around people who go too far on the right: you can just look at claim’s of racial superiority. But it’s not so easy to put a box around people who go too far on the left. There’s not a single thing you can point to that they do that has the same sort of red flag nature as claims of racial superiority. So it’s hard for people who are left-leaning, say I’m concerned with inequality and that sort of thing, to dissociate themselves from those who have clearly gone too far. And the problem is we really don’t know where the red flags are in leftist territory. Now for me it’s equality of outcome that is a good so-called equity. That’s a red flag. But it doesn’t seem as immediately pathological as claims of racial superiority. So it’s harder for people on the left to dissociate themselves from the people who, well, would do everyone in, essentially.

This in contrast to the college professor, the moderator to all the “tolerance” that the left preaches it is so good at, for trying to humiliate and ultimately rabidly “intolerating” the student who raised the question that hey, maybe there were only TWO genders, the way actual scientific biology says there are.  This crap happens all the time with ZERO consequences for these rabid ideologue professors; contrast that with the living hell Laura Ingraham is being put through for going after David Hogg (“How COULD you???  He’s just a CHILD!!!”).  Liberals are the worst hypocrites on earth.  And there is no one on earth, including ISIS terrorists, more extremist and totalitarian and Stalinist in their views than the liberal progressive.  You will agree with them or they will bury you, destroy you, and utilize raw official power to do so.  Liberal progressives are now the most self-righteous, the most Pharisaical, beings in all existence.  And when the entirety of all human history opposes them (they imposed by rabid fiat within the last few years what had never previously existed in any civilization in all history), when any kind of legitimate science opposes them (when they find the 69 other chromosomes besides “X” and “Y” maybe they’ll begin to have some kind of legitimate case), they follow the same mentality as the IED-wearing terrorist and simply go batpoop until whoever their target for hate is is publicly destroyed by a demonic cultural process.

Peterson’s assessment was so brilliant simply because it is so obviously true.  Consider the bald, naked FACT that communists murdered more than 100 million of their own people just during peacetime alone.  Chairman Mao was responsible for as many as EIGHTY MILLION DEATHS during his “Great Leap Forward.”  Understand that this mass-murdering psycho was actually lionized by top Obama administration officials!!!!

What makes this guy so right is the fact that Obama told America that The War on Inequality Is the New War on Poverty.  And the 20th century actually proved that this is THE most evil idea in the entire history of the human race.

This “equality of outcome” has ALWAYS been THE most cherished goal of the most wicked ideology in the entire history of the human race.  We’re all going to be so “equal” that we’ll all be equal in that we’ll all be JUST AS DEAD AS EVERYONE ELSE.

Pause in horror to consider the hell on earth Mao unleashed as he sought to impose the liberal dream and socialist goal of “equality of outcome” so everyone would be the same:

Chairman Mao:

“The atom bomb is nothing to be afraid of,” Mao told Nehru, “China has many people. . . . The deaths of ten or twenty million people is nothing to be afraid of.” A witness said Nehru showed shock. Later, speaking in Moscow, Mao displayed yet more generosity: he boasted that he was willing to lose 300 million people, half of China’s population.”

Chairman Mao:

LEE EDWARDS, CHAIRMAN, VICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: In 1959 to 1961 was the so-called “great leap forward” which was actually a gigantic leap backwards in which he tried to collectivize and communize agriculture.

And they came to him after the first year and they said, “Chairman, five million people have died of famine.” He said, “No matter, keep going.” In the second year, they came back and they said, “Ten million Chinese have died.” He said, “No matter, continue.” The third year, 20 million Chinese have died. And he said finally, “Well, perhaps this is not the best idea that I’ve ever had.”

CHANG: When he was told that, you know, his people were dying of starvation, Mao said, “Educate the peasants to eat less. Thus they can benefit – they can fertilize the land.”

Frankly, the fact of the matter is that Nazism itself came from the left: “NAZI” stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party.”  You tell me if there was a “Socialist American Workers Party,” which side of the political spectrum it would be on?  The fact of the matter is that the Nazis were a “rightwing” party ONLY in the sense that they were the “far right” of the whackjob hard core radical LEFT.  Hitler and his Nazis were avowed Darwinists and just like Marx and the communists, the Nazis got their doctrines of hate from Darwinism.  Hitler stated in the beginning of his rise to power that, “A stronger race will drive out the weaker ones, for the vital urge in its ultimate form will break down the absurd barriers of the so called humanity of individuals to make way for the humanity of nature which destroys the weak to give their place to the strong.”  Pure Darwinism.  Hitler stated as his Darwinian-survival-of-the-fittest-based Nazi regime was coming crashing down that, “If the German Volk is not strong enough and is not sufficiently prepared to offer its own blood for its existence, it should cease to exist and be destroyed by a stronger power.”  As the disastrous war based on Darwinism came to a vicious end, Hitler issued what has infamously become known as his “Nero Decree,” saying, “There is no […] need to worry about saving what is necessary for the German people to survive. … On the contrary, it is much better that we ourselves destroy everything. […] Our people has shown that it is the weakest; the future belongs exclusively to the people of the east, which is the strongest.”  All of these statements are Darwinian to the core.  Just as was the garbage about purifying the race so that the German Arian would be the strongest and most dominant race.  Hearken to Darwin’s less-famous subtitle for his “Origin of the Species:” On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.”

The principle rationale for the Holocaust was that the Jews were biologically inferior, and interfered with the Nazi scientists’ efforts to aid evolution by creating a master race.
Listen to these words and tell me who wrote them:

“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

It was none other than Charles Darwin himself (Darwin, C.R., “The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex,” [1871], John Murray: London, 1874, Second Edition, 1922, reprint, pp.241-242). Charles Darwin literally predicted that someone would come along and extend his Darwinism to its logical conclusion – and thus literally predicted both the Holocaust AND the motivations FOR the Holocaust.  Charles Darwin spake as a prophet, and Adolf Hitler was the messiah who fulfilled the demonic prophecy.  But it wasn’t just the Jew that Hitler was willing to exterminate as being “biologically inferior.” Adolf Hitler – who had made the Holocaust of the “biologically unfit” and “sub human” Jew the centerpiece of his campaign to create a “Master” Aryan race – ultimately made his “master race” the victim of his hateful Darwinian views.  The simple fadt of the matter is that Adolf Hitler thought in entirely Darwinian terms and his total war was an example of Darwinian survival of the fittest in action. He decreed the Jew had failed the test of Darwinism, and ultimately believed that if the German people could not prevail in his war that THEY TOO should be exterminated and replaced by a more fit race just as Darwinism taught.

And this atheist and Darwinist crap is all pumped out of the vile soul of the ideological LEFT.  The left has followed the same script that the communists gave them: identify what people realize is evil and demonize their ideological opponents for it – even though they practice the very identical same evil themselves; and even in fact when they are the ONLY ONES who practice that evil.  So the left says the Nazis were “right wing” because they were militaristic, demonically ignoring the fact that the largest militaries ever assembled were assembled by COMMUNISTS.  Think of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. whose military dwarfed our own; think the People’s Republic of China; think of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.  No one other than a fool or a liar would claim that “militarism” is “right wing.”  Similarly, they claim that “nationalism” makes a regime right wing, again demonically ignoring the fact that throughout his fight against Hitler, Stalin miraculously transformed his communism into nationalism, urging his people to fight for “Mother Russia” again and again and again.  And today for that matter, the communist People’s Republic of China is FIERCELY nationalistic and is economically employing a model far more similar to socialist fascism that pure communism.  Or they will with straight faces lecture us that the Nazis were “right wing” because they were “racist.”  Again, the model of demonizing whatever is most evil as belonging exclusively to their ideological enemies.  The U.S.S.R. murdered tens of millions of non-Russian people; today the Chinese still persecute non-Chinese ethnic peoples such as the Tibetans.  Our own “progressive left” in the United States has frequently employed hard core racism, and I still remember a leftist SEIU union head telling his very own union workers as “so fucking rabidly racist.”  In my very own family, one of the few rabid Democrats in 2008 refused to vote for Barack Obama.  Why?  Because he said, “I won’t vote for that fucking nigger.”  When I would have happily voted for Herman Cain, or later for Ben Carson.

I still remember a true ideological coward named Barack Hussein Obama dishonestly, vindictively and hypocritically attacking the Republicans as being “social Darwinists.”  When he himself is the true Darwinist.  Social Darwinism is logically and morally ENTAILED if Darwinism is true because the weak die out and the most fit survive.  And if that is true in the whole cosmos, then without any logical or moral question it would necessarily be true of any society that correctly followed this universal law of the universe.  Evolution and Darwinism logically and consistently applied would apply as an axiom the policy that the weak need to perish so the stronger can better survive, end of story.  But to be a Democrat is to be the worst and the most despicable kind of moral coward.  They constantly play the rhetorical game of deceiving people that they don’t believe what they clearly believe.  And so Democrats believe in evolution while simultaneously implicitly recognizing that theirs is an utterly evil ideology.  Stalin murdered at least forty million of his own people and Mao murdered as many as eighty million of his own people: but neither did so until they had total power over their people and until they had that total control abetted by leftist gun seizure laws that left the people weaponless and defenseless they constantly talked about how they cared about the people.

So to bring the point home, Democrats aren’t honest.  Like Obama with marriage, Democrats refuse to tell you what they truly believe.  They hide behind a world of slandering lies and fake outrage rhetoric.  Democrats used to actually believe in God, but they are now the official party of rabid secular humanist atheism.  Just like the communists who alone actually DO have “separation of church and state” in their Constitution.  Article 124 of the Soviet Constitution reads, “In order to ensure to citizens freedom of conscience, the church in the U.S.S.R. is separated from the state, and the school from the church.”  A better name for “communism” is “official state atheism,” since every single communist regime has in fact been officially atheist.  That’s the REAL premise upon which the evil regime is truly based.  Just like the Darwinan Nazis whose true war crime was actually believing the evil otherwise known as Darwinian evolution.  And just like the godless communist and the Darwinist Nazis, Democrats likewise want to strip the people of their right to resist their totalitarian power that they are seeking.

But not even the most ardently ideological, the most whackjob Nazi, Maoist or Stalinist, ever dared to dream that we could screw around with the very nature of gender and sexual identity.  That required a level of shocking human depravity that dwarfed even the most wild imaginings of even these most wicked bugs.

As of today, Democrats are directly responsible for the mass murder of SIXTY MILLION of THE most innocent human beings in their abortion mills.  Democrats will one day stand before God condemned as being ten times more evil than the damn Nazis; and every single Democrat will scream in the agony of the lowest pit of hell for a trillion times a trillion millennia for every single NANOSECOND that they callously ripped from these 60 million babies employing the same damned-by-God “logic” that the Nazis employed arguing that Jews weren’t fully human and therefore could be exterminated.

Abortion is a war of extermination not just against babies, but more directly against FATHERHOOD.  If that baby in the womb isn’t a baby, isn’t a human being, then what the hell IS a “father”???  What the hell did he “father”???  A lifeless lump of goop, Democrats assure us.  A thing that can be exterminated without thought or consequences, they assure us.  If that is in any way true, then any father can simply walk away from his kid without any thought or any consequence just as easily as any mother can murder the innocent human life growing in her womb as a result of what she and that father participated in creating.

Again, even the Nazis weren’t this damn depraved.  Heinrich Himmler told his SS who were carrying out the Final Solution that they had to be strong, that they were simply doing what had to be done, what was necessary, in his own version of the “make abortion safe, legal and rare” rationale.  Just like everything else, the Democratic Party has also become so warped it even now betrays the warped ideology it used to hold such that there is now a rabid, militant approval of what used to be something that was deemed sad, but necessary.  Which would be the moral equivalent of Himmler boasting in the Final Solution, exulting in it.  You could be a Nazi and not even know about, let alone believe in, the Final Solution of the Jewish race.  But now you can’t be a Democrat and not believe in abortion as the final solution for millions upon millions of babies who are selected for extermination.

The Democrat Party has made war on fathers and on fatherhood for a generation now.  And it is amazing how sick and toxic a place they have “fundamentally transformed” our society into as a direct result of their war on fatherhood, their war on children, their hell on earth policies that every single one of them will one day have to stand before God Almighty and give an account for.

And if you’re going to go to total, Hitler-style war-of-extermination-style wars on fatherhood and fathers and children, well, in bowling-analogy terms you’ve simply got to try to pick up the spare and similarly declare total war on so-called “toxic masculinity” and on boys.

It is frankly a truly amazing thing that has the left screeches about the crisis of “toxic masculinity,” in actual scientific fact men’s sperm counts have quite literally PLUMMETED.  “Sperm counts dropped by more than half over nearly four decades,” a massive scientific study recently found.  Which is to say to whatever extent there IS a crisis of “toxic masculinity,” it is quite literally the very OPPOSITE of what the left falsely claims it is.  What is in actual scientific fact “toxic” is that males AREN’T getting more masculine; they are getting less and less and LESS so.  Here’s the ACTUAL crisis of toxic masculinity:

The assessment, one of the largest ever undertaken, brings together the results of 185 studies between 1973 and 2011.

Dr Levine, an epidemiologist, told the BBC that if the trend continued humans would become extinct.

Liberalism is a mindless phenomenon, just as a colony of roaches is a mindless phenomenon.  These bugs will just do what they do.  They will not quit.  They have been programmed to mindlessly advance much the way Mao’s communist army mindlessly charged the U.S. military at the Chosin Reservoir in Korea in 1950.  And if these leftist ideologues fail to charge screaming machine-gun toting commissars will gun them down from behind.  Because the left only wants to seize guns from the people, not from the commissar-class who gets to control the people.  The left will not stop until males are extinct and the last feminist triumphantly dances on the last male’s grave, freed from the God-given burden of bringing the last baby into the world.  THAT is the assured result of liberalism, the cherished goal, the dream.

As the REAL toxic crap from leftist ideologues calling themselves “educators” persecuted boys and demonized maleness and manhood and basically indoctrinated a culture of boys being ashamed to be what they were biologically – even as the same rabid fools dismissed the very notion of “biology” itself in their Stalinist rather than scientific assessment that gender is a social construct – boys have simply been first falling behind, then dropping behind, then dropping out.  The left is literally targeting and attacking as unacceptable even the very words “man” and “male,” let alone being a man or being encouraged or even allowed to ACT like one.  As an example, the widely-used online writing and grammar resource by Purdue University encourages college students to avoid ‘generic use of MAN and other words with masculine markers.’

Men are becoming less male because that is the only choice the screaming, rabid, leftist culture that simultaneously depicts itself as “the tolerant ones” will allow.  And the decline of men simply logically follows the extinction-path generated by the left, by liberals, by the Democratic Party, of fathers and fatherhood.  THIS has been the longest war in American history, the war on men.  And men have surrendered but the feminist left won’t stop with mere victory.  Fewer and fewer men are working; and the men who are working are working fewer hours than ever beforeMillions of prime age men are simply missing from the economy as the ravages of liberal policy have ripped their dreadful toll into our culture.  As a result of these simple facts that liberals simply mindlessly deny as much as Hitler denied he was losing the war, fewer and fewer men are getting married because they don’t have the economic resources to get married.  Which means fewer and fewer women are getting married because they no longer view men as viable partners.

And as a result of this war, the very group that denies the reality of biology has created a species-threatening biological reality.  We have diminished sperm counts.  That is NOT a sign of masculinity, but rather the exact freaking OPPOSITE.  But that’s just reality, and liberalism is a rabid denial of reality.

And yes, the sad, assured result of these liberal policies which have utterly destroyed the American middle class primarily by destroying men, young men are increasingly becoming bitter, resentful, angry.  And they are increasingly acting out.  And that means more and more violence.  Because males have been treated like animals and what the hell do you expect animals to do???

Yeah.  The left went too far.  WAY too far.

The only problem is that the time to stop them was nearly forty years ago.  Because everything that has followed since Roe v. Wade in 1973 was the equivalent of a snowball running downhill until it became an avalanche.

And now it may very well be too late for our species.

Hey, Hypocrite Facebook Fools, Why Didn’t You Damn Liberals Care When Obama Pulled The Same Stunt In 2012?

March 23, 2018

So I’m reading my paper and seeing all the butthurt and anger over the fact that a researcher named Aleksandr Kogan gave a research company named Cambridge Analytica access Facebook users’ data. Which used that data to help Donald Trump win the presidential election. And Facebook is now claiming that Cambridge Analytica had “violated its rules” and suspended them. But now, the entire planet is alarmed that Facebook is armed with so much data on so many of its addicted users and that it might actually give such information to a Republican presidential campaign to help them win. I mean, its truly evil.

And so now Facebook’s stock has plummeted to the tune of a $40 billion loss and Mark Zuckerberg is out confessing how terribly wrong it is hoping to avoid regulation the way the makers of other highly addictive products are regulated and the way other monopolies are regulated. And authorities are climbing all over Cambridge Analytica for its worse-than-what-the-Nazis-did crime against humanity.

Personally, I would be thrilled if Facebook and Google were broken up. But that would require the political left being morally consistent for once in its roach-collective existence, and that will never happen.

But here’s the rub: Facebook did the exact same thing back in the 2012 campaign and helped Obama win.

Townhall – in an article titled, “Former Obama Staffer: Facebook Allowed Us To Break User Data Rules Because They Were On Our Side,” put it this way:

Well, one former data officer for the Obama campaign, Carol Davidsen, admitted that Facebook allowed them to break the rules because they were on their side.
First, she tweeted a Time magazine piece showing what the 2012 campaign did to gather information:

In the final weeks before Election Day, a scary statistic emerged from the databases at Barack Obama’s Chicago headquarters: half the campaign’s targeted swing-state voters under age 29 had no listed phone number. They lived in the cellular shadows, effectively immune to traditional get-out-the-vote efforts.
For a campaign dependent on a big youth turnout, this could have been a crisis. But the Obama team had a solution in place: a Facebook application that will transform the way campaigns are conducted in the future. For supporters, the app appeared to be just another way to digitally connect to the campaign. But to the Windy City number crunchers, it was a game changer. “I think this will wind up being the most groundbreaking piece of technology developed for this campaign,” says Teddy Goff, the Obama campaign’s digital director.

That’s because the more than 1 million Obama backers who signed up for the app gave the campaign permission to look at their Facebook friend lists. In an instant, the campaign had a way to see the hidden young voters. Roughly 85% of those without a listed phone number could be found in the uploaded friend lists. What’s more, Facebook offered an ideal way to reach them. “People don’t trust campaigns. They don’t even trust media organizations,” says Goff. “Who do they trust? Their friends.”

Davidsen then detailed on Twitter how representatives from the social media company were surprised how much data they mined, adding that they were “very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.”

And Townhall didn’t merely make up an “unnamed source” the way the leftist media gets their sources for their fake news hit pieces on Trump; they actually posted former Obama campaign director Carol Davidsen’s own words:

Carol Davidsen_Facebook helped Obama

So Obama’s 2012 campaign director publicly stated that the Facebook crack dealers “were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.” She said that Facebook was surprised that Obama roaches “were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing.”

FACT: The Obama campaign harvested user data from MILLIONS of Facebook users in the 2012 campaign. It literally gave Obama victory.

FACT: none oft he people who are so rabid and so angry and so bitter gave a flying damn that Obama did the very thing that is so terrible and so inexcusable and so evil now.

FACT: Facebook even benignly assisted Obama, as opposed to merely not realizing that one of its researchers had done for a pro-Trump organization what the entire organization had done for Obama.

FACT: to be a liberal is to be the very worst manner of hypocrite vermin there is; to be a liberal means to be a being incapable of virtue, or integrity, or honesty, or decency, or any kind of good thing whatsoever.

Good Questions For Both Sides On Gun Control And Good Questions For The Left To Contemplate As Their Toxic Worldview Reveals Itself

February 28, 2018

One of the lines that I have borrowed from radio talk show host Dennis Prager is this: “I prefer clarity to agreement,” which means that I would rather we both honestly understand one another’s true positions even when we fundamentally disagree with one another than that we come to some misleading politically-worded compromise following a “dialogue.”

I came across the following today and thought it worth posting.  The author is a Democrat politician and clearly reveals his own personal bias at the outset.  But he also points out that even his own side has “routinely disappointed” him and then proceeds to offer five very fair questions for both sides in the gun control debate.  I will interact with him on the questions he poses for my position, in which I state my own bias that the 2nd Amendment exists for a very important reason and that as long as we intend to remain in any meaningful way connected to our Constitution, we need to safeguard the right for citizens to keep and bear arms and fight efforts to infringe on that right:

Questions you should ask politicians about guns (according to a politician)
By Mike Gatto
Feb 27, 2018 | 10:30 AM

My father was murdered by a handgun-wielding assailant, so the firearms debate is personal for me. And I’m routinely disappointed by how disingenuous it is on both sides. I worry that each party just wants to mobilize its base and raise campaign funds rather than solve tough policy problems.

Next time you hear a politician offer a simplistic solution, here are some questions to ask.

If the politician favors gun control:

1. What will tougher laws accomplish when there are already roughly two guns in circulation for every American adult? Are you proposing the mass seizure of firearms? It’s not just the 2nd Amendment that’s at issue, but the 5th, which prohibits the taking of private property without compensation.
2. You say you favor an “assault weapon” ban, but most murders in the U.S. are committed using handguns. Do you have a separate plan to address handgun violence (which occurs daily)?

3. For that matter, do you realize that there is no sound legal or technical definition of an “assault weapon?” The 1994 ban, which expired in 2004, was rife with loopholes. Rather than political catchwords, explain your intentions using terms that have a precise meaning, like “semiautomatic.”
4. You’ve suggested that the 2nd Amendment should be read to protect only the muskets and rudimentary rifles extant at the time the Constitution was drafted. Do you realize how problematic this logic is? Do you believe the 1st Amendment should protect print newspapers but not television broadcasts, web-based journalism, or social-media posts?
5. The Constitution belongs to the people of the United States, and if the requisite supermajorities agree, the people can amend it to reflect changing mores. So have the guts to be honest: Do you believe we should repeal the 2nd Amendment?

If the politician does not favor gun control:

1. You’ve offered “thoughts and prayers” for the victims. Do you realize how trite that sounds? Could you please take the initiative to change your phrasing once in a while? And is there anything besides thinking and praying that you believe you can do?
2. You say you believe the solution is not to pass more gun laws, but to enforce the ones we already have on the books. So what have you done to insist that the relevant agencies do just that?
3. According to the National Rifle Assn., only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun. You’ve extended that logic to schools, advocating that we arm teachers. But most mass shootings happen so fast, there isn’t much time to react. I can’t imagine my first-grade teacher stopping a determined killer, and I don’t believe parents want schools to look like prisons. Besides, is it fair to turn teachers into security guards? Do you really believe arming educators is the solution?
4. The 2nd Amendment confers a right to bear arms, but no constitutional right, even free speech, is absolute. So if you make blanket statements about the 2nd Amendment, why don’t you tell us where you draw the line?
5. Background checks won’t end gun violence. But they can stop a portion of the mentally ill population (or criminals or domestic abusers) from purchasing guns legally. How can you argue that a better system won’t prevent at least some crimes?
Even under pressure, I fear politicians on both sides are neither honest nor realistic on this issue.
But here’s what we can do. The low-hanging fruit if we want to lower rates of gun violence is to address drug use and mental health problems. Large percentages of those incarcerated for violent crimes committed those acts under the influence of drugs or to obtain money to buy drugs. And a large percentage of mass shooters are mentally ill. So try to notice the signs of mental illness and addiction, and do whatever possible to get friends and family the help they need.
Meanwhile, by all means, ask politicians those tough questions.

Mike Gatto, a Democrat, served four terms in the California Assembly. He is an attorney and legislator in residence at USC’s Unruh Institute of Politics. Twitter: @mikegatto

I have not met Mike Gatto and frankly have never heard of him.  But I have respect for this man because I believe he tries to be equally tough on both sides in this debate and I have the sense that he too prefers clarity to bogus agreements that are nothing but words loaded with loopholes intended to deceive the public into believing that something was done when in fact it wasn’t.

I will deal with Mike Gatto’s “If the politician does not favor gun control” point-by-point:

FIRST, “thoughts” are surely trite, but “prayers” are not to anyone who believes in God and believes that He created us in His image and loves us.  Is this an open acknowledgement that Democrats don’t believe in God or in the power of prayer?  Because it frankly seems obvious to me at this point that the Democratic Party has radically turned into a secular humanist party and “God” is a nice-sounding thing for these people to say much the way Adolf Hitler referred to God and Christianity as a cynical way to cloak a clearly ungodly thing with the language of pseudo-religiousity.

But having stated that, let me proceed from there: we are at an impossible point with the mainstream Democrat Party – by which I now mean radically liberal (when even the reliably liberal Dianne Feinstein is not NEARLY “liberal” enough for this radical Democratic Party today) – in which they very CLEARLY want to first erode and undermine and ultimately strip the 2nd Amendment of having any actual force or meaning.  And so in this climate, every single thing we give them is simply one step closer to what I truly believe is a fascist goal: every single on of the 22 former totalitarian communist regimes and currently including the five current totalitarian communist regimes stripped their people of the right to keep and bear arms.  Every single one of them.  And when 82% of communist countries are “former” communist countries, I submit that this is just one of many powerful evidences that this system does not work.  Adolf Hitler stated, “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjugated races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subjugated races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police.”  This is the clear totalitarian mindset, to strip people who could be a threat to your regime – such as the people you intend to work to death in death camps – to have access to weapons to fight back against tyranny.

I simply submit that what the Democrats want is opposed to the very heart of what our founding fathers believed was most important to a free society.  And we’re seeing it now very starkly as Democrats not only oppose the guns which guarantee my right to free speech, but the very free speech and the right to my religious beliefs protected by the 1st Amendment.  We have seen tyrannous impositions on religious belief protected by the First Amendment in the forms of direct and very personal systematic attacks in the name of abortion and homosexuality.  Barack Obama repeatedly attacked “The Little Sisters of the Poor” for the thought crime of being pro-life.  As just one of his many direct attacks on people who merely tried to follow the crystal-clear teachings of their ancient religion which in fact was the foundation of our nation.  And now on our universities that were enshrined as institutions cherishing freedom of thought, ideas and speech, we are increasingly seeing the rabid left essentially scream that anyone who disagrees with them should not have the right to speakWe are now watching a terrifying tactic playing out as liberal activist violently protest conservative speech and literally riot; which is followed by liberal administrators declaring that because liberals are vicious fascist, they have no choice but to ban the conservative right to free speech which these administrators themselves also oppose!  Democrats today represent a clear and present danger to everything our founding fathers established.

The framers of the Constitution enshrined the 1st Amendment first because free speech which is the heart of all true freedom was their most cherished goal; and they enshrined the 2nd Amendment right after it because they correctly viewed the right of the individual to keep and bear arms as the greatest safeguard of the 1st Amendment.  The 2nd Amendment was a reaction against government tyranny.

We have a situation in which we are seeing more shootings not because there are more guns than there were fifty years ago.  In fact there actually were more guns per capital fifty years ago than there are today, and with fewer gun restrictions/laws.  And interestingly, overall gun crime has actually gone DOWN in the years since 1993 when Bill Clinton first began to terrorize the American people into starting to buy guns in the fear that their rights would soon be taken away (a policy doubled-down upon by Barack Obama which caused another frenzy of gun purchasing).  The result of Bill Clinton’s efforts was the 1994 Assault Weapons ban which was documented to have produced absolutely nothing.  And when Democrats keep screaming at us “to do something,” why shouldn’t the onus be upon them to prove that their stripping me of my constitutionally guaranteed rights will actually produce what they falsely claim it will????

But let me get back to the paragraph that precedes the immediately above: we are seeing our society devolve – I believe because of the secular humanism and atheism and the abortion mentality that have created a zeitgeist of nihilism.  Nothing is sacred, there is no ultimate judgment, and if I am unhappy there is no reason why I shouldn’t “exercise my right to choose” and “my right to my own body” and start killing as many people as I can just like I learned to do on television programs and movies and video games created by liberals have taught me to do.  They have desensitized us to violence because they claimed they had a right to do that even when no, they did NOT have such a right!  And now they want to take away the most necessary rights that were guaranteed by our Constitution.  Sixty million innocent human beings are now dead, making the Democratic Party ten times more murderous than were the Nazis with the Jews in the Holocaust.  Democrats have an absolutely morally vicious agenda.  And so, even as Democrats have in fact caused people to become more violent by taking away God and divine morality, I still prefer the violence that they have unleashed to the greater violence they surely WILL unleash in the years that would follow when I wouldn’t have the means to resist them when they come after me the same way Hitler came after Jews and Democrats came after babies.

And so when every single “gun control” measure is merely one more small step toward the giant step for repealing the 2nd Amendment (just like Lenin and Stalin did, just like Hitler did, just like Chairman Mao did, just like the Kim dynasty did), I will fight it tooth and nail.  It comes down to this: if you want us to come your way with more common-sense gun control measures, then YOU have to come our way with more definitive pro-2nd Amendment measures.  As long as any repeal of the 2nd Amendment is on the damn table, as long as Democrat activists are allowed to keep agitating to something that Hitler and Stalin and Mao failed to be able to do in this country, as you keep hysterically screaming that we need to “do something” no matter how irrational and useless that something is.

SECOND, are you seriously trying to tell me that the refusal to follow the damn law as it already exist on the damn books is somehow OUR fault, you who rabidly fly in the face of THE LAW when it comes to illegal immigration????  Are you seriously that dishonest, that much of a hypocrite????  It’s not just illegal immigration; you did the same thing with our drug laws and a whole host of other laws.  We’re now entering the rabid hysterical madness of the leftist “Me Too” movement, but the liberals driving this movement conveniently forget great moments in history when they were the ones fighting FOR powerful sexual predators, such as when Roman Polanski was cheered with a standing ovation by Hollywood liberals for drugging and sodomizing a 13-year old minor girl.  Such as when first Ted Kennedy literally abandoned a young girl to die a miserable death and then returned to his party and such as when Bill Clinton was demonstrated to be a serial sexual predator for years and then was protected by Democrats after saying, “It depends on what the meaning of the word is is,” incredibly telling the American people that since he wasn’t in fact actually having sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky at the precise nanosecond that he claimed he hadn’t had sex, that in fact he was somehow being honest in saying there is no sexual relationship.  The fact of the matter is that Democrats have been the anti-law and the anti-order party for a generation.  The fact is that Obama mass-pardoned gun-toting criminals on a regular basisThe fact is that Obama simply refused to prosecute criminals for violating all kinds of gun laws even as he routinely whined for more gun laws.  And the fact is that liberal-and-Democrat-dominated cities such as Chicago are notorious for refusing to prosecute gun criminals.  So don’t you Democrats damn refuse to apply the law in your Democrat Party bastions and then blame me for it.

Yes, we need to enforce our laws.  Republicans believe that; it’s Democrats who need to learn that.  When a Democrat-Party-owned liberal state like California becomes a “sanctuary state” in direct opposition to our clear federal laws, when a Democrat, liberal mayor actively defies and interferes with federal law and literally warns criminals that the law is coming for them so they can continue to get away with their violation of federal law – and you actually tolerate that and don’t demand she resign immediately – you don’t get to lecture me about that and not have me point out what a lying, no-good, dirty rotten hypocrite fascist you are.  And there is simply no point trying to negotiate with the likes of you because you are totally and utterly devoid of anything even close to honor or virtue or decency or honesty or integrity.

In other words, Mike Gatto’s number 2 FAR more applies to Democrats than it does to Republicans.  Don’t you DARE pin that on us.  As Jesus put it, look at the damn log in your OWN eye before you mention the speck in mine.  So there are actually SIX objections to gun control that Democrats have to answer and only four we have to respond to – EVEN FROM A LIBERAL.

THIRD, are you seriously trying to claim that since gun violence can happen quickly, that there is therefore no reason to try to react to that violence as quickly as possible?  There isn’t much time to react, so let’s not react at all.  That would be insane, but that is your prima facie argument.  No, let’s react.  Let’s get that good guy with a gun in as quickly as humanly possible to stop any bad guy with a gun.  If you’re going to lecture me that the only way to deal with this is to take away everybody’s right to own a gun as the only possible way to deal with the possibility of a bad guy getting a gun, please refer to the Constitution.  That is not an option.  And a far better option that actually IS Constitutional is to end “gun free zones” given the fact that 98% of all mass shootings in our history have happened in gun free zones.  There’s a reason psychos are attracted to gun free zones for the same reason that there’s a reason that burglars don’t enter homes with the owner pointing shotguns at their faces.  Like the death penalty that Democrats refuse to allow, armed citizens is a deterrent to tyranny.  It simply is.  And so, no, while I am not demanding that every single 1st grade teacher strap a .44 magnum to their belts, I AM saying that there surely ARE teachers and staff members who would be willing to be armed to protect their children.

This argument that “I am a teacher and teaching is fundamentally incompatible with protecting children” is again frankly morally insane.  I frankly would prefer a teacher who would be willing to protect me to one who militantly refuses to protect me.  Yes, please give me the teacher who loves his or her students enough to protect them.  And the state of Texas is just one state that believe it or not already found that yes there are TOO teachers who are willing to protect their students.

We can install metal detectors and that would do some good.  But when you start paying full-time active-duty police officers to be on site at a school all day, you will drive up the cost of education.  And maybe homeschooling kids is then the best option and we should simply fire all ya’all teachers if you won’t lift a finger to protect kids and teach our children in the safety of our homes since you insist on remaining a gun-free zone where 98% of all shootings have happened.

So yes, it IS fair to turn our teachers into security guards.  At least if they’re going to claim that they care about their kids rather than their damn leftist Stalinist ideology.  Okay?

Or maybe an even MORE unacceptable alternative to these same leftist teachers is that they return to teaching about God and about the divine morality that we used to teach back in the day when our schools weren’t shooting galleries????

FOURTH, this idea that “the 2nd Amendment isn’t absolute” is actually quite laughable when you consider something called “facts.”  You see, I happen to know that we already have ALL DAMN KINDS OF LIMITS on the 2nd Amendment.  Or else, for instance, I’d have a damned machine gun and I’d be free to shoot any liberal who pissed me off.  We have at least TEN MAJOR FEDERAL GUN LAWS not to mention the thousands of state gun laws.

But here’s the funny thing, since you don’t believe in “absolute rights” then I’m glad to hear you’re willing to have a Voter ID card!!!!  No?  Because you actually DO believe in “absolute rights” even for illegal immigrants and even for felons????  Hey, Nazis, did you know the Nazi Party was ELECTED by voters????  Did you know that the Palestinian people used their right to vote to elect a terrorist group as their leaders????

Homosexuals have absolute rights even to marriage as leftist fascist and yes-homosexual-and-therefore-personally-biased judges simply threw out and disregarded the clear will of the people even in liberal states like California with Proposition 8.  The left similarly simply ignored all previous morality as well as any pretense to “science” and has created 63 genders and given them absolute rights that boggle the damn mind.  When a girl who is trying to become a boy and pumping herself full of male hormones is allowed to win the girls wrestling championship because she had some kind of damned “absolute right” to compete as a whatever-the-hell-she-is, it is so way past time for you liberals to look in the damn mirror when you whine about “absolute rights” that you make me puke.

The fact is that we conservatives and even we conservative NRA members are FAR more likely to limit the right to keep and bear arms than you have been with all your wicked rights.  Capeesh????

I’ll take to you about sensible limits on guns the day AFTER you stop believing that any of your fellow liberals should have any right to believe you have “absolute rights,” let alone the absolute right to keep seeking to take away my constitutionally enshrined rights even as you invent right after right after right to murder your own babies, practice immoral and depraved behaviors, etc.

FIFTH, background checks.  We’ve already got them, flying in the face of your frankly incredibly ridiculous argument number 4. above.  But at this point, we aren’t allowed to go into somebody’s medical records because fascist liberal judges who dreamed of a world with 60 million murdered babies in America invented “the right to privacy.”  At least, unless I want to be “private” about my 2nd Amendment RIGHT which unlike the “right” to abortion actually IS a right.

If you actually would like to end the carnage, please stop being wicked and morally insane and END ABORTION LOGIC.  END ABORTION MENTALITY.  And we’ll start with this “right to privacy” which was the first “penumbra and emanations”-fake-right invented by judges as they stared into their own crystal ball to visualize a right that had never before existed so they could impose whatever the hell “right” they wanted.

Hey, Democrat, my mental health is as much a private matter between me and my doctor as your abortion is a private matter between you and your doctor.  I’m crazy and you’re a murderer and we’re both about to do something truly evil and take another human being’s life.

And maybe you moral monsters should end this vicious cycle.

So let’s END abortion privacy rights which would cause the “right” to abortion to topple like a rotten, termite-infested foundation that it is.  And then we can go into the medical records of people requesting to buy a gun and say, “Wait a minute!  This man is NUTS!  Oh, HELL no!”

So Democrats, being fascist hypocrites, of course want “the right to privacy” to murder babies, but they want to take away the same right so they can take away the 2nd Amendment.  Bullcrap.  Just bullcrap.

But until then, let us understand that liberals gave the next shooter the right to privacy, the right to choose, the freedom over his own body.  And their acts are merely retroactive abortions.

On these issues, kindly deal with the great big fat giant logs in your own eyes, Democrats.

 

 

I’m In Favor Of A 21-Year Minimum Age To Buy ‘Assault Weapons’ – The Day AFTER We Have The Same Minimum Age To Vote Or Serve In The Military

February 27, 2018

I didn’t register for Selective Services when I turned 18 as the law has required for now over a hundred years.  Do you know why?  Because I was already enlisted in the United States Army, that’s why.  And when I was in boot camp looking at all the newly shaved heads around me, do you know what I saw?  A whole lot of other 18-year olds.

Those 18-, 19- and 2-year olds form a giant chunk of our military.  Did you know that?  How about this one: 36.9% of our Marines are 21 or under.  If we didn’t have these “kids” bearing arms, we wouldn’t have the guys who rush enemy positions.  Not unless YOU’RE going to do it, you weak, limpy old fool.

But just stop and think about the logic for a second: let’s decide that people under 21 can’t have a gun because they’re not responsible enough.  Except for the military where they have proven for a thousand generations that yes, they ARE responsible enough and in fact we need the flower of our youth to be armed so they can fight our battles for us.

I was 18-years old with an assault rifle; I was 19-years old with an assault rifle; I was 20-years old with an assault rifle. And not your dumbass fake-news “assault weapon,” but an actual assault rifle capable of fully automatic weapons fire.  The term “assault weapon,” by contrast, is a purely leftist and media and Democrat Party created fake news.  “Assault weapons” in fact do not actually exist.  It is an arbitrary, aesthetic manufactured meme.  A sporting rifle with a walnut stock is just another garden variety sporting rifle; take that walnut stock off and replace it with a black plastic one with an L-shaped grip and presto bismo you suddenly have an “assault weapon.”  The actual characteristics of the rifle remain unchanged.

Further, assault rifles (and the so-called “assault weapons” marketed on the design concept) are chambered in far less powerful cartridges than most other sporting rifles. And the assault weapons favored by the left for demagoguery are actually far less lethal than other rifles. I happen to own a Browning BAR in .300 Winchester Magnum. And yeah, I know it’s not an “assault weapon” because it has that beautiful walnut stock on it! Do you know how devastatingly powerful that sucker is compared to an “assault weapon”? Compare between 3,600 foot-pounds of muzzle energy and a 1,500 meter maximum effective range for the 300 Winchester Magnum versus 1,600 foot-pounds and a 550 meter maximum effective range for the .223 caliber “assault weapon.” Back in World War II, the average soldier carried his M-1 which chambered a .30-06 round; again, the actual ballistics favor the M-1 over the “assault rifle” by amazing levels: again, a thousand-yard gun with twice the energy of an “assault weapon.” This “debate” is based on pure demagoguery at its very most cynical, disingenuous, dishonest level.

And my actual assault rifle was also sans bump stock. A rifle needs to be held securely and firmly against the shoulder in order to be accurately fired.  Anybody who knows a damned thing about rifles knows that.  But a bump stock requires a loose shoulder hold that creates the rattle to rapidly depress the trigger.  And that affects accuracy in a way that simply doesn’t exist with true assault rifles that are designed for select-fire.  A bump stock reduces your accuracy to virtually nothing.  Stephen Paddock was able to shoot into a giant crowd, but otherwise he couldn’t have hit the broad side of a barn with that stupid gadget.  I’m all in favor of banning bump stocks simply because they are a novelty that make guns less effective rather than more effective.  Me, I was entrusted with an actual assault rifle! And I carried that weapon for every single American citizen! And guess what else I had? Large magazines to carry lots of firepower. And every single day of my service I proved that I was capable of bearing arms in a responsible manner for the good of my society and my country.

The reason the left hates me so much is because I am a living refutation of their lies: I not only carried these weapons, and carried them in a responsible manner, but carried them to the benefit of my country.  As do millions of other responsible gun owners who use these weapons safely and responsibly.

If you ban “kids” from having these weapons, you might as well just ban the United States Marine Corps altogether.  It’s a damn shame.  No enemy on earth could defeat our Marines; except for despicable, pathetic, gutless, miserable liberalism and the pure moral stupidity and spirit of cowardice that permeates our nation because of these jackass fools.

But I’ll tell you what: if kids aren’t responsible enough to own weapons or fight in our military, then you snot-nosed little dumbasses are hardly responsible enough to do the most responsible thing one can do in our democratic society and VOTE. No own who can’t have an assault weapon should be trusted to vote, either.

Fifty years ago we had more guns per capita and we had a lot fewer gun laws per capita, and yet we had far fewer of these mass shootings.  Something has changed in our culture and it is NOT the guns.  And even since first Bill Clinton in 1993, then Barack Obama frightened Americans into buying guns before these fascists tried to take them away, in fact gun violence actually went DOWN even as gun ownership went UP.  Because it’s NOT the guns.  Again, for Stephen Paddock, it wasn’t his rifle that pulled the trigger; it was his secular humanistic atheism and the nihilistic spirit that entails from that cockroach worldview that pulled the trigger.  Liberalism put the REAL weapon in these murderers’ hands because they took God out and allowed the nihilistic emptiness in.  Stephen Paddock, like 98% of all mass shooters, deliberately identified “a gun-free zone” so that he would be the only one with the gun.  Only two mass shootings in the U.S. since 1950 have occurred in an area where citizens were not prohibited from carrying a gun.  We’re having these mass shootings because we have more crazies than ever and thanks to liberalism we can’t put them away for the same reason we can’t violate illegal immigrants’ “rights” and deport them.  We have no means to deal with mentally sick people now unless and until they explode and do something truly evil.  And even AFTER their crimes liberals try to help them avoid true justice by taking away the death penalty so that these murderers can find out that the atheism that liberals pumped into their skulls was fake news and there REALLY IS a God who judges evil.  JUST TODAY, liberals assured us yet again that theirs is a worldview that WILL NOT hold people who commit truly brutal and heinous crimes accountable for what they did to their victims.  And it is the same left who are pumping out incredibly toxic video games and movies and television programs that desensitize us to violence in the most appalling manner.

What is interesting is that WE ALREADY TRIED this “assault weapons” ban thing.  For ten years we did this starting with Bill Clinton in 1994.  Which by the way was the very act of government fascist tyranny that began the movement for Americans to start buying more guns lest their rights be usurped from them that I referred to above.  And do you know the effect the “assault weapons ban” had???  ZERO.

Do you know what the definition of “insanity” is?  Trying to do the same damn thing that didn’t work before again and again.  Which is a prima facia evidence that liberals truly are insane.  And that leads to another realization: if we eliminated guns just from the groups of people who overwhelmingly vote “Democrat,” our gun violence would drop by a good 90 percent overnight.  These are the actual factsThey surely are.  I’m serious, that’s what the actual facts when you truly begin considering crime and race show.

So I’m actually all in FAVOR of taking guns away.  By removing the right to own guns from the political party that wants to have them banned in the damn first place.  Because this would be a vastly safer nation if we just gave them what they wanted and took their guns away from them while those of us who know that we are responsible kept our 2nd Amendment right and used that right to safeguard our freedom.

Getting back to my main argument, and removing “assault weapons” from people under 21, what is frankly amazing in its hypocrisy is that the left – the liberal mainstream media and the Democratic Party – are trotting out and touting all these angry teenagers who have just been traumatized as being the very smartest, wisest and best informed liberals whom we should therefore listen to.  But here’s the damn thing: by their very own “logic” these kids aren’t psychologically or emotionally capable of handling this issue – because they’re saying none of these whiny little fools ought to be trusted with guns in the first place!!!  Which means I can simply tune you whiny little ignorant punks out.  Again, this is demagoguery at its very lowest level.

It was the left, it was liberalism, it was secular progressive humanistic atheism, that has created this horrible vacuum in which people are beginning to increasingly say, “I’m miserable and since we all just ‘evolved’ from pond slime there is no true, ultimate purpose, no real, ultimate value and no genuine, ultimate meaning and therefore my life doesn’t matter and therefore nobody else’s life matters and so what I’m about to do is nothing more than a mass retro-active abortion.

Hearken to the words of Blaise Pascal:

“What else does this craving, and this helplessness, proclaim but that there was once in man a true happiness, of which all that now remains is the empty print and trace? This he tries in vain to fill with everything around him, seeking in things that are not there the help he cannot find in those that are, though none can help, since this infinite abyss can be filled only with an infinite and immutable object; in other words by God himself.”
– Blaise Pascal, Pensées VII(425)

That “God-shaped” hole has been filled with something that is most definitely UNGODLY and the hole will get uglier and uglier until we turn away from liberalism and fill the hole in our soul with the God who formed us in His image to be morally and spiritually accountable to Him as He fulfills His plan for us in our lives.  If we don’t have God, we’re going to have something else.  And now we’re finding out what that “else” is.

 

What We REALLY Need To Ban If We’re Going To Even Think Of Banning The 2nd Amendment

February 19, 2018

First of all, if the 2nd Amendment is a “limited” right, then ALL of our other constitutionally guaranteed rights are also “limited.”  I have to love it that the same people who want to “limit” the 2nd Amendment rabidly demand that there be no limits whatsoever to “the right to vote,” including not only convicted felons but now even also to illegal immigrants.  If you are even considering “limiting” the 2nd Amendment and you are not for voter ID laws, then you are simply somebody to disregard as an ideologue.  The fact of the matter is that “the right to vote” is an obviously dangerous thing, unless you happen to believe that the rise of the Nazi Party that was ELECTED is not a dangerous thing.  In another example, recently the Palestinians elected a TERRORIST GROUP to power.  Further, since we’re largely talking about illegal immigrants from Mexico when we discuss voter ID, let’s not forget the fact that in Mexico, if you do not have a voter ID, YOU DO NOT GET TO VOTE.

Now, one of the reasons I mention “illegal immigrants” is the fact that the shooter – Nikolas Cruz – IS HISPANIC.  Liberals snarl that if we were disarmed from having “assault weapons” he wouldn’t have been able to pull this off.  But how about this one: if we didn’t have HISPANICS he wouldn’t have been able to pull this off, either.  If you’re going to ban the one, let’s ban the other.  Otherwise you might start getting reasonable and realize that we have tens of millions of these weapons in the hands of decent, law-abiding people and just maybe we shouldn’t target all of them because of the actions of one miserable whackjob.  But otherwise, let’s turn as much rage and hate on Hispanics for being Hispanic as we do on “assault weapons” for being “assault weapons.”  Because, news flash, fools, that rifle Cruz used did NOT squeeze its own trigger.  Cruz squeezed it and kept squeezing it.

What’s really funny – in the ironic sense of moral idiots who refuse to learn from history – is that we’ve already TRIED this and IT DID NOT DO A DAMN THING.  Democrats banned what they created the term “assault weapons” (to mimic the military term assault rifle referring to a weapon capable of full as well as semi-automatic fire in order to artificially create a false equivalence between the two) and it had no impact on crime or violence.  None.  That’s why we don’t have it anymore.  It lapsed, having been nothing more than a deprivation of the rights of millions of Americans.

What liberals want is to create and then keep taking us down a slippery slope, such that if the “assault weapons” ban (which is already a proven failure) fails again, well, we just need to keep banning more stuff, like handguns.

For those liberals in favor of applying limits to the 2nd Amendment, I simply ask you, what can I ban that YOU believe is a critical and fundamental right, given that you want to take away my right to defend myself and my family?

Here’s another one: the way the left wants to blame gun owners and people who advocate for the 2nd Amendment every time a gun is used to kill someone, please to explain why the hell we can’t demonize YOU in any jurisdiction with tough gun laws when a victim is first rendered defenseless and then a vicious predator comes in and attacks?

How about this little factoid from USA Today:

Killers continue targeting locations where guns are not allowed. Ninety-eight percent of public mass shootings in this country occur in gun-free zones — the Florida school being one of them.

How about if we start screaming that we need to purge the world of all proponents of gun-free zones so that we can be SAFE???  We need to BAN gun-free zones and criminally prosecute anybody who supports them.

Here’s another fact:

that 81% of police officers support arming teachers and principals, so that the real first responders — the potential victims — can protect the children.

Let’s BAN anybody who doesn’t believe in arming guards and teachers and even volunteer parents who are willing to pass background checks and have required training so we can protect our children on our schools.

It is a fact proven in every single situation we have faced that these mass shootings stop the moment a good guy with a gun shows up.  A whopping majority of the time the killers kill themselves.  Which kind of proves that guns aren’t evil; guns are tools.  People are evil.  And so if you’re going to start banning, ban people.

But, oh wait, liberals are already doing that.  It’s called “abortion” and liberals have already banned 60 million people from having a right to live.

We talk about DACA and these poor, poor DACA kids who were brought here through no fault of their own and that means they should have a right to live here.  Okay, fine.  As long as you realize that 60 million times now liberals have ignored the very logic of their own hypocritical belief and kill innocent human beings who were brought into the world through no fault of their own.

Nikolas Cruz exercised his “right to choose” and his “right to his own body” and retroactively aborted 17 people.  Abortion is death.  And we now have a culture of death.  And we ought to ban everybody who has in any way, shape or form contributed to this evil zeitgeist.

Fifty years ago there were more guns per capita in American hands than there are today.  Fifty years ago we also had far fewer anti-gun laws and regulations and restrictions than we have today.  THE KILLINGS WE ARE SEEING TODAY ARE NOT BECAUSE OF GUNS and anyone who isn’t a fool immediately realizes that something ELSE has changed.  THE KILLINGS WE ARE SEEING TODAY ARE DUE TO GODLESSNESS.

Fifty years ago we believed in God and taught divine morality and therefore we believed in the soul and the sanctity of human life.  We rejected “abortion morality” and the belief that innocent human beings could be exterminated like bugs.  We are now talking about every single liberal being ten times more guilty of mass murder than the damn NAZIS.

And I’ll just say that if you believe in abortion and you believe in gun control, I’ll just quote your ideological buddy Adolf Hitler who said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.”  Along with Stalin.  Along with Mao.  Along with Castro and Pol Pot and Kim Jong-un.  Because you are following the same damn pathway to hell on earth and somebody needs to ban your vile ass fast.

I tell you what: our last two mass murdering psychos were both atheists.   Eric Paddock, Stephen Paddock’s brother, claimed that his brother had no religion and no religious affiliation.  The last mass shooting psycho was a militant atheist.  Paddock too exercised his “right to choose” by choosing a country-music venue for his rabid hate dominated by religious conservatives.

I still vividly remember the first mass school shooting, the Columbine High School massacre on April 20, 1999.  It’s amazing how the secular humanist left took that ball and ran with it in bogus documentaries like “Bowling for Columbine.”  But the real weapon wasn’t guns as much as it was ATHEISM.  Both were outspokenly atheist.  They recorded their thoughts and one of them was, “We are no longer human, for we have evolved beyond human morality.”  I can easily refute that from my Christian biblical vantage point, but atheist, I defy YOU to refute that premise and prove that it cannot be true.  You cannot, because you believe in human evolution and you believe that “morality” evolved as nothing more than a part of human evolution.  And just as the lion and the tiger and the wolf evolved to kill, why couldn’t Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris?  We don’t remember now because our mainstream media doesn’t want us to acknowledge or comprehend the REAL pattern of school shootings, but the Columbine killers followed an example that had already been set for them on December 1, 1997, when fourteen-year-old Michael Carneal concealed a shotgun and a .22 rifle in a blanket and brought them to school so he could attack a Christian youth prayer meeting.  He killed 3 and wounded five Christians.  There is absolutely no question that Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris specifically targeted students who believed in God.  The media tried to cover this motive up but the father of one of the victims published the audio recordings of the killers detailing their rabid atheist anti-Christian hate.  Had they not fixated on their rabid atheist hatred, and just indiscriminaetly murdered, they would have been able to murder a whole lot more kids.

And this trend has continued in school shootings.  In Oregon, atheist gunman Chris Harper-Mercer had already made his hatred for Christians rabidly visible on his online profile before he went to Umpqua Community College in Roseburg and asked his victims, “Are you a Christian?”

We have ALWAYS been a gun-culture in America because we have always been a FREE society and the most basic tenet of true freedom is to be allowed to have the damn right and freedom to protect yourself and what is yours from anyone who would try to take it.  There are people, socialists, communists, atheists (who don’t believe in the soul and therefore cannot have any doctrine of free will given that they are forced to believe we are meat puppets who think the way we do simply because the molecules in our brains randomly happened to arrange themselves a certain way), liberals and Democrats, who do not believe in freedom.  And these people who deny our freedom need to be banned.

The fact-free news that falsely identified and linked Nikolas Cruz with a “white supremacist group” because it was in their ideological propaganda interests to do so try to tell us that atheism and mass killings are somehow non sequitur.  To be a “journalist” today is to be a liberal hired by liberals to distort the truth and “report” only “facts” that advance a particular ideology and atheists are a cherished, protected species of these liars.  But fact:

Atheism is the political philosophy responsible for more than 100 million murders of their own people just in peacetime alone.

Atheism and the communism atheism ultimately logically entails is without any question whatsoever THE most murderous worldview of any that has ever contaminated the human species.  And atheism needs to be banned and atheists and communists alike need to be banned.

Let me simply point out that generals have always known that most human beings and most soldiers simply will not kill other human beings without a great deal of conditioning.  And the primary barrier to killing has always been religious faith and the belief that this “enemy” is in fact a human being created in God’s image just like me.  Amazingly, one small change was enough to dramatically increase American soldiers’ willingness to aim a rifle at an enemy and pull the trigger.  During the Vietnam War, human-shaped sillouhettes were introduced.  And soldiers became more conditioned to kill.

Today, our secular humanist atheism has spawned savage, vicious, vile video games that are to the human-shaped sillouhette what the atomic bomb is to a spear.  Atheism and the ramifications of atheism has spawned this culture of death that we are now haunted by FAR more than we are haunted by guns that by themselves have never once so much as harmed anybody because it takes hate to pull the trigger.

And the left is so deeply into mass media culture it is beyond unreal.  Google and Facebook and all the others are rabidly liberalFacebook workers routinely suppressed conservative news and views by sheer fraud, pretending it was “trending” and that the masses of users were doing the work of bias when really it was fascist workers at Facebook.  The whole “tech” industry is so overwhelmingly liberal it is beyond unreal.  And the people coming out with each new “execution” video, each “school shooting rehearsal game” are LIBERALS.

And they need to have their asses BANNED because you yourself are participating in their murders if you DON’T ban them.

If we can limit constitutional rights and specifically limit certain components of those rights, we can certainly isolate out and limit atheism from the panoply of religious rights and ban atheism and the ugly worldview of hate and meaningless, murderous rampages straight to the hell it came from.  So let’s do it.

But don’t believe me.  Believe your fellow liberal traveler, CBS vice president and senior legal counsel Hayley Geftman-Gold who posted after an atheist gunned down 500 mostly conservative and Christian country music fans in Las Vegas:

“I’m actually not even sympathetic bc [sic] country music fans often are Republican gun toters [sic].”

I mean, you’re not a victim unless a liberal SAYS you’re a victim.

The media is so rabidly biased it is unreal.  When 91% of Trump coverage is negative, something is toxically rancid in “journalism.”

We need to BAN liberal bias in our newsrooms and if they won’t ban these “reporters” and these “journalists” who are propagandists, we need to ban the entire publication.  BAN IT.  Because if you can ban the 2nd Amendment, you can ban the media.  And damn you if you don’t, you hypocrites.

And so when the rabid Democrat who shot up the baseball practice of the Congressional Republican baseball team first asked if the players on the field were Republican or Democrat, Republicans weren’t victims of rabid Democrat hate.  When Rand Paul was physically attacked by a Trump-hater and Bernie Sanders supporter, he didn’t get to be a victim of political hate.  When Trump rally after Trump rally was violently attacked by Democrat activists, Trump supporters didn’t get to be victims but literally got “fake-news” depicted as the bad guys.  When Hidden Camera Video Shows Democrats Sent Agitators To Trump Rallies, it didn’t matter.  And it doesn’t matter how much of an obvious fact that rabid, Democrat Party hate is.

This punk turd, Nikolas Cruz, should never have been allowed to have any kind of gun.  That is a fact that nobody is arguing.  If you have something from the NRA saying that Nikolas Cruz should have had his guns, then let’s see it.  This isn’t about guns.  This is about a massive failure in a system that is broken in a whole bunch of ways.  This pathetic loser showed “every red flag,” according to the New York Times.  The turd posted a YouTube video of himself saying he wished to be a professional school shooter.  He had obvious mental health issues.  You’ve got government law enforcement agencies that failed; you’ve got government social services agencies that failed.  The FBI was informed of his behavior but did nothing because they had been commissioned by Obama and by the Democrat Party machine to invest all of their resources into a witch-hunt against Donald Trump and the 2016 presidential election and the democratic will of the people itself.

But what does the left want?  Amazingly, the left wants MORE power and MORE control in the very government that was just proven to be so damn broken!!!

The definition of insanity is giving the same government that continuously fails more power to fail even more while simultaneously stripping people of their God-given right to defend themselves against that very government, let alone all the horrible people that Democrats keep demanding we let out of our prisons to prey upon us again and again.

We ought to ban anybody who doesn’t believe in the death penalty.

It can also be pointed out that the FBI is so damned overwhelmed not only with the rabid Democrat-collusion-with-Russia-based-investigation into President Donald Trump, but also the shocking number of IMMIGRANTS on the terrorist watch list.  There are over a million names on that list now to occupy the FBI with less than half of one percent being US citizens.

Don’t believe me, liberal?  Then please believe Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein:

Feinstein explained that the Watch Lists are populated with “information derived from intelligence and law enforcement sources…” and are maintained by the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center. She further revealed that largest list, the Terrorist Screening Database, contains over one-million records but less than 5,000 Americans included on that list. Or, as Sen. Feinstein repeatedly said, Americans make up less than one-half of one percent of the Terrorist Screening Database.

And so anyone who is not in favor of massively banning immigrants is to be viewed as personally responsible for the mass shootings because we have lost any meaningful way to detect our monsters due to the massive number of immigrants whom Democrats rabidly protect.

How the hell are the FBI agents – you know, the ones who AREN’T wrapped up in political investigations started by Democrat ideologues and obviously rabid partisan ideologues within the FBI itself – supposed to examine a Nikolas Cruz when they’ve got more than a million potential terrorists invited into our country by the Democrat Party???

These fools who think like this need to be banned something fierce.

Here’s yet another example of Democrats being people who we need to ban: the death penalty which they rabidly oppose and play every single shenanigan there is to undermine it when they can’t ban it.  Nikolas Cruz actually is willing to plead guilty to his crime.  Why?  To avoid the death penalty.  Newsflash: the death penalty IS a deterrent, you fools.  Especially if it is done swiftly and with certainty where we put these rabid human beings down like the rabid animals they are as soon after the crime as is humanly possible.

We have a mental health system that is fundamentally incapable of dealing with this insanity because the same mentality that justifies preventing investigations into illegal immigration status and getting illegal immigrants out of our country also justifies preventing us from getting crazy people off the streets.  I mean, these people should have all the same rights the rest of us do.  And until an illegal immigrant or a psycho commits some terrible crime, you shouldn’t be able to do a damn thing.  And in the case of the illegal immigrant murderer of victim Kate Steinle, even if an illegal immigrant DOES commit murder he still gets to go free.

Let me return to Mexico – you know, the country with strict voter ID laws – that also allows families to have a process to commit a mentally unstable person against that person’s will.  It’s amazing to me how liberals want more and more millions of Mexicans flooding into America but refuse to allow any of the actual good things that the country that sends them here actually follows.

We need to ban people who believe that anyone who is acting or posting crazy shouldn’t be taken off the streets and examined and treated until they are no longer a threat.

My God, I think of a family that is dear to me, who suffered with a young man who was schizophrenic.  The young man KNEW he needed help and tried to get it, but there was only one crack to fall through after another.  He used drugs like virtually all mentally ill people who are wandering around to try to self-medicate the pain, but he couldn’t get arrested literally to save his life even when police found all the drugs and drug paraphernalia on him.  Because, after all, the left employs this “logic”

We are now indoctrinating and addicting an entire generation of young people into the use of mind altering substances, and I am simply going to guarantee you that the problems plaguing our society are going to increase beyond stratospherically.

The Democrat-created drug culture WILL be a nightmare.  You watch and enjoy the horror show first on the news, then in your town, then in your home.

But no liberal, no Democrat, is ever going to accept responsibility for the hell they caused.

Which is why we need to ban the damn Democrat Party fast.  The Democrat Party is the party of slavery and the party that fought a vicious war to continue the institution of slavery.  It has been the party of abject evil ever since.  And it needs to be banned something fierce.

If we’re going to start banning, then for God’s sake let’s start banning what truly needs to be banned.

Finally, we have laws against what Nikolas Cruz did.  Did you know that?  It is ILLEGAL to go to a school and start shooting people!  But he did it anyone.  Why on earth does anybody believe that criminals and psychopaths won’t still get guns if some dumbass makes it “illegal”?

Of The Political Leftist (And Godless) Spin On ‘Christians’ And The Recognition Of Jerusalem As Israel’s Capitol: Prepare to Be ‘Left Behind’

December 26, 2017

I’ve been real busy these past few weeks, frankly too busy to write blog articles.  Now here it is Christmas and my routine has come to a glorious pause.  But it’s fortuitous that my last article was on the status of Jerusalem and the wicked going batpoop over President Donald Trump doing what Bill Clinton and Barack Obama along with George W. Bush and basically the entire Congress including one hypocrite named Diane Feinstein all said they believed should be done.

So Obama on June 4, 2008 told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in his very first foreign policy speech after winning the Democratic Party nomination for president this:

“Let me be clear. Israel’s security is sacrosanct. It is non-negotiable.

“The Palestinians need a state that is contiguous and cohesive, and that allows them to prosper — but any agreement with the Palestinian people must preserve Israel’s identity as a Jewish state, with secure, recognised and defensible borders.

“Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided. I have no illusions that this will be easy.”

But history since amply proved that whenever Obama said the words, “Let me be clear,” that whatever came out of his mouth afterward would be an outrageous lie.

George Bush also spoke to AIPAC and he said:

“Something will happen when I’m president: as soon as I take office I will begin the process of moving the US ambassador to the city Israel has chosen as its capital.”

What about Bill Clinton?  Oh, yeah, he’s a liar and hypocrite too, who said one thing and then did another.  Might as well have said, “Let me be clear” the way Obama has done with his red line on Syria and so many other times when he was about to lie to the American people.

Bill Clinton declared in February 1992, at the height of the Democratic primaries, that he supported recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, a step that would alter U.S. policy.

Later, during the general election campaign, Clinton attacked President George H.W. Bush for having “repeatedly challenged Israel’s sovereignty over a united Jerusalem.” He promised that he and running mate Al Gore would “support Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Israel.”
read more: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.769498

And I detailed in my last article:

In 1995 The 104th Congress of the United States passed The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 overwhelmingly in a bipartisan vote and a veto-proof majority by a by the Senate (93–5) and the House (374–37).

And also as I detailed, just six months ago, Democrat Senators like U.S. Senator from uberleftist Californiastan voted to demand that the president recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capitol:

(CNSNews.com) – Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein has written to President Trump, urging him not to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel or to announce he is moving the U.S. Embassy to the city.

Exactly six months ago Tuesday, the senior senator from California voted in favor of a resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of Israel’s reunification of Jerusalem, and calling on the president to “abide by” the provisions of the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act.

That 1995 legislation said Jerusalem should be recognized as Israel’s capital, and required the president to move the embassy from Tel Aviv by May 31, 1999. Feinstein, the eighth-longest serving senator, voted in favor of it on Oct. 24, 1995.

So it’s not like Donald Trump did something unheard of, out of the blue.  He merely did what every single U.S. president and virtually ALL Of Congress have declared they were going to do.

But that’s, well, basically obvious and clear U.S. history for the past seventy years, since Harry S. Truman became the first world leader to officially recognize the state of Israel in 1948 when beyond miraculously, Israel defeated six nations that each dwarfed them in size, in population and in resources to fulfill what the Bible declared would happen in Ezekiel chapter 37:1-14 in the prophecy of the dry bones:

37 The hand of the Lord was on me, and he brought me out by the Spirit of the Lord and set me in the middle of a valley; it was full of bones. He led me back and forth among them, and I saw a great many bones on the floor of the valley, bones that were very dry. He asked me, “Son of man, can these bones live?”

I said, “Sovereign Lord, you alone know.”

Then He said to me, “Prophesy to these bones and say to them, ‘Dry bones, hear the word of the Lord! This is what the Sovereign Lord says to these bones: I will make breath[a] enter you, and you will come to life. I will attach tendons to you and make flesh come upon you and cover you with skin; I will put breath in you, and you will come to life. Then you will know that I am the Lord.’”

So I prophesied as I was commanded. And as I was prophesying, there was a noise, a rattling sound, and the bones came together, bone to bone. I looked, and tendons and flesh appeared on them and skin covered them, but there was no breath in them.

Then He said to me, “Prophesy to the breath; prophesy, son of man, and say to it, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: Come, breath, from the four winds and breathe into these slain, that they may live.’” 10 So I prophesied as he commanded me, and breath entered them; they came to life and stood up on their feet—a vast army.

11 Then He said to me: “Son of man, these bones are the people of Israel. They say, ‘Our bones are dried up and our hope is gone; we are cut off.’ 12 Therefore prophesy and say to them: ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: My people, I am going to open your graves and bring you up from them; I will bring you back to the land of Israel. 13 Then you, My people, will know that I am the Lord, when I open your graves and bring you up from them. 14 I will put my Spirit in you and you will live, and I will settle you in your own land. Then you will know that I the Lord have spoken, and I have done it, declares the Lord.’”

Now, somebody who doesn’t understand Scripture beyond their own pathetic theological system might try to explain this away by saying it was already fulfilled when Israel came back from Babylon.  Some problems with that: 1) the Jews don’t come back from Babylon in Ezekiel 37; they come from “the four winds.”  They come from the four corners of the planet, having been dispersed worldwide.  And 2) the next chapter, 38, gives us the enemy that this reborn from dried bones Israel would face: Gog of the land of Magog – i.e. every single linguistic analysis says this is modern-day RUSSIA – Persia, a.k.a. modern-day Iran and a host of nations that today are ALL Islamic.  So the Jews will come not from Babylon but from all over the earth and the enemy the reborn Israel will face will NOT be Babylon, but Russia and Iran leading a host of Islamic nations.  In point of fact, Babylon is not mentioned in the prophetic narrative of the last-days invasion of Israel at all.  Which is why Joel C. Rosenberg BEFORE the 9/11 attack wrote his novel, “The Last Jihad” in which terrorists from Iraq flew a plane into the World Trade Center: to get rid of Saddam Hussein.  Why?  Because Joel realized that Iraq (modern-day Babylon) was NOT in the host of nations that would attack Israel, and could not understand how a Saddam Hussein would not participate in such a war against Israel.  And so Rosenberg, simply believing the biblical account, took Saddam out.  And yes, what Rosenberg realized from prophecy came to pass because the Bible is the true, inspired word of a God who declares the end from the beginning (Isaiah 46:10).  Further, if anyone wants to foolishly argue that the prophecy of the dry bones of Israel coming back to life from the dried, desiccated dead was a past event with no present or future ramifications, another passage from Scripture prevails:

He has remembered His covenant forever, the word which He commanded to a thousand generations, the covenant which He made with Abraham, and His oath to Isaac.  Then He confirmed it to Jacob for a statute, to Israel as an everlasting covenant, saying, “To you I will give the land of Canaan As the portion of your inheritance.” – Psalm 105:8-11

The LORD God has remembered His covenant for how long?  FOREVER.  A thousand generations?  Well, keep in mind Jesus was born in Bethlehem only 50 generations ago, so I think we’re still good on the thousand thing.  And again, what kind of covenant is it?  Oh, it’s an EVERLASTING one.

So I pick up my Lost Angeles Slimes and read an article titled, “There’s a sharp split among Christians over Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital,” and spit out my coffee.  How can one human being be so full of crap as the author of this article or the editor who allowed it or the publisher of the paper who publishes fake news like this?

The article authoritatively asserts, “The key to understanding this rift is the evangelical belief in what is necessary to pave the way for the second coming of Jesus.”

No, you pathetically ignorant dumbass who clearly has no idea whatsoever what the hell you’re writing about.

Interestingly, as I will get to, that above quote in context says, “The divide between evangelicals and other Christian denominations reflects two views of Jerusalem — one traditional and political, the other literal and theological. The key to understanding this rift is the evangelical belief in what is necessary to pave the way for the second coming of Jesus. ”  I’ll get to the “traditional and political” versus the “literal and theological.”  But let me begin my attack on this stupid notion that evangelical Christians are trying to “pave the way for the second coming of Jesus.”

I don’t like to throw out my bona fides, but I’ve got not one but TWO masters degrees from basically THE most evangelical Christian university on the planet: BIOLA University’s Talbot School of Theology.  And I can assure you that evangelicals are in no way, no shape or no form attempting to “pave the way for the second coming of Jesus.”  No, that’s a branch of Islam, that is looking for the Twelfth Imam who will only appear if they bathe the world in blood to force his appearing.  They believe that “In order to save the world, it must be in a state of chaos and subjugation.”  And so they are trying to force the hand of destiny.  And that is NOT the project of Evangelical Christians.  The Los Angeles Times is doing nothing more than spreading propaganda and bigoted hate against evangelicals in making such preposterous claims.

As a testimony to that fact, simply scroll down my last article written on December 6 about Trump and Jerusalem, and see if I say ANYTHING about “the second coming.”  Because the fact of the matter is that I don’t say a single word about that.  Rather, I look to the PAST of what God declared in His eternal Word and I look at what is simply RIGHT.  I passionately believe in the Second Coming of Messiah Jesus, and I just as passionately believe the scriptures from both the Old and New Testaments that state that Jews WILL recognize the Messiah whom they pierced (Zechariah 12:10) and they will repent and believe just short of too late.  And in the Book of Revelation, again, we see Israel and Jerusalem and yes, even the TEMPLE which WILL be rebuilt.  We see 144,000 Jews from each of the Twelve Tribes of Israel coming like a host of Billy Grahams (Revelation 7:4 and Revelation 14:3); we see a divine rescue of Israel from the coming Antichrist (Revelation 12:13-17) as Jews take shelter in a place that is very likely Petra and be kept safe until Messiah – like the Good Shepherd protecting His flock – rescues them at the 2nd Coming.  So, certainly there is darned good reason I believe in the modern state of Israel as an amazing fulfillment of biblical prophecy and a key to the coming last days before the Rapture, the 2nd Coming and the Millennium.

But I’m not out to “pave the way.”  I’m an evangelical; which means I am standing for what is right against what is wrong, and I am standing for what the Word of the Living God declares.  And the Word of the Living God declares that yes, Jerusalem IS the capitol of Israel, always was and always will be particularly given the fact that God raised Israel from the dried bones of death after the nation had been dead and in the grave for very nearly 2,000 years (from A.D. 70 to 1948 and in fact 1967 when they miraculously retook Jerusalem).  I didn’t cause Israel to become a nation again and neither did evangelicals and neither did the United States or any other country or even Jews; GOD caused Israel to become a nation again beyond all hope.

Therein lies the issue with these supposed “Christians” who so ardently oppose what God declared was His will from the time of Abraham until now and forever for a thousand generations as an everlasting covenant.

And we just witnessed in the United Nations vote the other day the mindset that will be a fulfillment to Psalm 83:4, “Come,” they say, “let us destroy them as a nation, so that Israel’s name is remembered no more.”  This is the same wicked United Nations that has wickedly voted to condemn Israel more times than it has condemned all the rest of the nations of the world COMBINED.  And everyone who is on the side of the United Nations is in fulfillment of the Word of God on the side of the devil against the LORD God, the God of Israel.  And very frankly, if you are one of these people reading these words now, it is YOUR wickedness that is “paving the way” for the second coming of Jesus.  Because the Bible makes very clear that it is WICKEDNESS, not righteousness, that will cause Messiah Jesus to save the world that He created from destroying itself.  The Bible pits the works of the devil and those who are of their father, the devil (John 8:44), against the work of God: and it is in response to the works of the devil and those who are of their father the devil, rather than evangelicals “paving the way,” who will bring about the coming of the King of kings and Lord of lords.

Don’t you dare blame me LA Times, wicked unrepentant and unregenerate sinners, for “paving the way for the second coming of Jesus.”  Because that’s going to be on YOU.  As for me, I believe I’ll already be in heaven, having either been raptured or martyred, prior to the return of Jesus as King of kings and Lord of lords.  Prior to the events known as the Tribulation (right after the Church age described in Revelation chapters 1-3 in 4:1), the Bible describes a “Come up here!”) moment for Christians.  After which a coming political figure (Revelation 6) called the Antichrist or the beast rules over a world that most clearly does NOT want the LORD God of Israel, but rather secular humanism and socialism, to be their god, will worship this political tyrant and eventually take his mark on their right hand or forehead (Revelation 16:2).

The Bible tells us that there will be a great apostasy in the end times, a falling away, prior to the emergence of the man of lawlessness:

“Don’t be fooled by what they say. For that day will not come until there is a great rebellion against God and the man of lawlessness is revealed–the one who brings destruction.” — 2 Thessalonians 2:3

St. Paul – after restating the clear message of the Bible that yes, there WILL be a third temple constructed where the world says over its dead body will there be a Jewish temple, and that the Antichrist will sit in the holy of holies and declare himself “God” when it is built, continues:

“And you know what is holding him back, for he can be revealed only when his time comes.  For this lawlessness is already at work secretly, and it will remain secret until the one who is holding it back steps out of the way.  Then the man of lawlessness will be revealed, but the Lord Jesus will kill him with the breath of His mouth and destroy him by the splendor of His coming.” — 2 Thessalonians 2:7-8

The ONLY thing holding Antichrist back is the Holy Spirit present in the true, believing Church.  But there will be a time when we will all be “caught up together” with Jesus to meet the Lord in the air (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18).  It is this word “caught up” – harpazo in the Greek, rapturo in the Latin – that the word “rapture” comes from.  In the Rapture, Christ doesn’t come to earth, but rather WE who truly know Him and love Him will come to HIM in the air.  And there will be a moment where there are literally no true Christians living or dead on planet earth.  Those who have Christ in their hearts, the true Church that is restraining the true evil that will result in the spirit and the coming of Antichrist, will be taken away.

Jesus says to one of His faithful churches, the last church before the apostacizing church of Laodicea where Jesus is literally outside knocking trying to get in with the door shut in His face (Revelation 3:20), these words:  “Because you have kept the word of My perseverance, I also will keep you from the hour of testing, that hour which is about to come upont he whole world, to test those who dwell on the earth” (Revelation 3:10).

Which is my cue to leave this earth as I’m caught up to meet the Lord in the air, and the cue of all of those who were faithful to the Word of God and who kept God’s word even when the world hated us because they hated Jesus first (John 15:18-19).

When Jesus says to the last generation of faithful Christians before the coming of the apostasy where most of the church totally falls away, “Because you have kept the word of My perseverance,” He isn’t referring to the “‘political and traditional’ “Christians.”  Oh, no, He is most definitely NOT.  You who are of the Laodicean age, of pseudo-Christians who are wedded to the ways of the wicked world, will be very, very surprised when true Christians are suddenly GONE and yes, in the plot of the famous Tim LaHaye novel series, you are “Left Behind.”  The LA Times article sets up the contrast very, very succinctly: there are those who are about “tradition and politics,” and there will be those who are about faithfully, literally following the Word of God as He revealed it.  We  didn’t abandon the Word of God when some feminist organization said that abortion was in and the sanctity of life was out; we didn’t abandon the Word of God when some opinion poll came out and said homosexuality was in and God-ordained marriage between one man and one woman was out of vogue.  We held to our conscience which was rooted in the Word of God, not godless secular humanism.

Tradition and politics.  Neither are very good things.  As for politics, that these people who oppose God’s Word and therefore oppose Jerusalem as God’s capitol of God’s people Israel hold so fast to, do you know what it is?  It is sticking your finger up to the latest public opinion survey and demagoguing at best the least of two evils.  And that’s politics at its BEST, because often they slant the truth and try to convince the people to vote for utopian lies that will never come true.  And yes, tradition. Jesus pointed out what He thought of tradition in Mark 7:8: “You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”  As the NLT puts the same verse, “For you ignore God’s law and substitute your own tradition.”  Yeah, that works.  Jesus said, “you cancel the word of God for the sake of your own tradition” (Matthew 15:6).  That is EXACTLY what the left has not only done, but gloried in doing.  Colossians 2:8 says, “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, which are based on human tradition and the spiritual forces of the world rather than on Christ.”  Everything the left and the Laodicean “Christian” loves is based on human philosophy and empty tradition in diametric opposition to the Gospel and the Word of God.

And the same is true of Israel and Jerusalem.  The Bible couldn’t be more clear who should have Jerusalem, but the world and the Laodicean church don’t give a flying damn what the Word of God declares, other than the fact that they are like the coming Antichrist wicked people who delight in moral godlessness and lawlessness and make up their own gods and their own laws as they impose their will and their way.

How did this pseudo-Christian garbage on Israel and Jerusalem begin?  It began in the 5th century AD through a man named Augustine.  Augustine read his Bible and it didn’t make any literal sense to him because any literal reading made it clear that Israel and Jerusalem the temple were part of the fundamental plan of God and there hadn’t been an Israel or a temple for over 400 years and it didn’t look like they were coming back.  Why, they were like dried up bones in the graveyard!!!  And so Augustine rewrote the understanding of the Bible, came up with his own damned theology, that was based not on the Word of God as it was literally revealed in literal, actual words, but rather in allegory and “spiritualization” and metaphor.  And so the Bible came to mean exactly what humans wanted it to mean, and it came to stand for exactly what humans wanted it to stand for.  The Word of God was no longer allowed to clearly and simply speak for itself; no, it required clever men with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense to explain it to the rest of us.

We see this in the Bible and we see the exact same people using the exact same crap on our Constitution.  What does the Constitution mean?  Certainly not what it says, but what liberals want it to mean as they impose their will on it and on society, all the while claiming to be the damn champions of the very thing they are most intent on perverting.  You take the 2nd Amendment as a very clear example: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”  Well, say the intellectuals – which is another word for “fool” these days – only a well-regulated militia is able to keep and bear arms, not the people.  Or the people are the militia and nothing else.  The only problem is that the Constitution very crystal-clearly says “THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”  So on their own damn reading, let’s make sure that only militia people have the right to anything the 1st Amendment guarantees.  After all, it focuses on “the right of the people” and we know that only applies to people in militias, right?  In the same way, only militia members should be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.  Because again, the 4th amendment declares it’s “the right of the people” to have these things.  And if morally idiotic liberals had any kind of moral consistency, they would apply this ONLY to people in well-regulated militias.  Liberals are indoctrinated into a tradition of lies and are therefore filled with lies and propagate lies in place of the truth.

When you read what the founding fathers themselves said about gun ownership and “the people,” it is compelling to anyone who is NOT a complete fool.  “The people” actually means “the people.”  Go figure.  The problem is, that in these last days, we have a gigantic surplus of complete fools.  And the 2nd Amendment properly understood was the founding fathers’ distrust of government and even democracy itself and a reaction against government- and mob-tyranny, such that we should in the United States of America have a government afraid of its people rather than a people afraid of their government.  Take Benjamin Franklin’s quotes.  He said, “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!”  He said, “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

I’m sorry, that’s just me reading something literally, you know, the way it is supposed to be read.  If I tell you the phone book is a cookbook for cannibals and that we all are supposed to dine on the bodies of liberals after slaughtering them like pigs, all I’m doing is reading the phone book a different way.  But the liberal judges have “penumbras and emanations” to guide them and to hell with the obvious, literal meaning.  As Thurgood Marshall once encapsulated liberal thinking, “you do what you think is right and let the law catch up.”  Because to be a liberal means to stand above the law, above the Constitution, and as we have seen above presidential elections.  And impose whatever the damn hell they want and feel pharisaically self-righteous about it the whole damn time they’re doing it.  We’re seeing that on our universities as even professors scream down free speech which they once hypocritically professed as sacred and as sacrosanct as a ruse to get their fascist way and then slam the door shut on everyone else.

Just so you understand the two sides, one is the ONLY democracy in the history of the entire Middle East; the other side has an official “pay to slay” policy that has been issuing incredibly generous benefits to the family members of terrorists who killed themselves in the act of murdering Jews.  Thank God, the Republicans just passed a bill to yank American taxpayer funds that have been used to murder Jews and even to murder US citizens.   Donald Trump has virtually destroyed the Islamic State that Obama was helpless to defeat in a matter of months.  But that victory doesn’t even MATTER to the left that was very frankly actually likely rooting for the terrorists to defeat Trump.  By and large, the media and the Democratic Party has despicably simply pretended there never was an “ISIS.”  And because Islam is at its heart a violent political ideology masquerading as a “religion of peace,” violence immediately erupted following Friday prayers as was expected.  If Islam WERE a religion of peace, imams would have calmed down the political passions of Muslims; instead they used the pretext of religion to inflame violence.  Would a genyine Christian pastor of any decent church declare “three days of rage” and send out a Christian flock to commit acts of violence if something were passed/decided that we didn’t like?  Would you go out with violence in your heart in the name of “the Prince of Peace”?  The news said, “Anger was the mood”  in this “three days of rage.”  Interesting reaction from “the religion of peace”!!!  And here we are, weeks later, witnessing the same rabid spirit of hate from the same “religion of peace.”

In the LA Times article, the focus is on the hate of the other side as the primary justification for why Trump was wrong.  And the hateful side that embraces violence as solution is right!!!

What does this say about the left when they keep doing this?  Not only with the Palestinians on Jerusalem – notwithstanding that they built their damn mosque RIGHT ON TOP of the temple and if Jews treated Arabs the same way Arabs treated Jews there wouldn’t be any Muslims – but think of the violent movement Occupy Wall Street which warped into the violent movement Black Lives Matter and so on with the embrace of the leftist media and the Democratic Party leadership.  Think of the liberal universities cancelling free speech because the side they hate wants to be allowed to exercise the right to free speech and their own side is wiling to use violence to prevent it.  Liberalism is believing that people should have the right to do what people ought not do.  Liberalism is siding with evil against good.

In point of fact, Trump declared that we have given the Palestinians fifty years to fairly negotiate peace, and all they have done is spill as much blood as possible.  Even today, they rabidly refuse to even acknowledge in their maps for their school children that there IS such a thing as “Israel.”  For Palestinians who teach terrorism to their children and financially reward the families of “martyred” terrorists who “nobly sacrificed their lives” to murder innocent victims with explosives in marketplaces and on public transportation, anyone who has a shred of decency in their hearts, let alone the Holy Spirit, clearly sees which side is on the right and which side has been wrong and in fact demonically evil for decades.

Jesus put it clearly, ye Laodicean “Christians” who are so rich in your liberal traditions and your liberal politics and who don’t honor God or His Word: prepare to be Left Behind when the rapture comes.

President Trump Does What He Promised And What The United States Promised To Do In 1995 And Recognizes Jerusalem As Israel’s Capitol

December 6, 2017

In 1995 The 104th Congress of the United States passed The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 overwhelmingly in a bipartisan vote and a veto-proof majority by a by the Senate (93–5) and the House (374–37).  But we had a dissembling liar, coward and yes, we know today by the left’s own standards, a RAPIST in the White House named Bill Clinton.  And that dishonest cowardly rapist refused to sign what the Congress had overwhelmingly declared.  And so the law was never implemented.

When he was running for president, Donald Trump repeatedly declared that he would recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capitol and relocate the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem.

Israel built the first temple in the 10th century Before Christ, about 950 BC.  That temple was destroyed by the Babylonians in 587 BC but rebuilt with all construction completed in 516 BC.  That temple stood until the Romans destroyed it in 70 AD.  Versus the Muslims, who built their Dome of the Rock or Mosque of Omar ON TOP OF the Jewish Temple, with construction beginning in the late 7th century Anno Domini, in 687 AD.  Now, there are people who have the divine ability to comprehend something called “reality” who therefore understand that the Jews were there first and that it IS and always HAS BEEN their land.

In fact King David retook by force what his ancestor Abraham had lawfully purchased back in Genesis 23:1-20 and Genesis 49:31.  Abraham proved his faithfulness to God at that same site known today as the Temple Mount and the Temple was built on the place where God had spoken to Abraham.

When the Muslims conquered the land in the 7th century, they built a mosque on the very location the people they conquered held most sacred.  By any liberal or secular humanist standard that isn’t a hypocritical double-standard, what the Muslims did was an act of great historic evil.

But sadly, there is literally no such thing as a liberal or secular humanist who is not a hypocrite who bases his or her worldview and understanding of right and wrong on a constantly shifting double-standard with the only consistency being that they are always right no matter how gravely wrong they are.

Just so you understand the two sides, one is the ONLY democracy in the history of the entire Middle East; the other side has an official “pay to slay” policy that has been issuing incredibly generous benefits to the family members of terrorists who killed themselves in the act of murdering Jews.  Thank God, the Republicans just passed a bill to yank American taxpayer funds that have been used to murder Jews and even to murder US citizens.

I’m simply going to put it thus: anyone who sides with the terrorist Palestinians is every bit as bad as any Nazi.  Pure and simple.  I’m sure Hitler would have been delighted to have such a generous pension program for Holocaust murderers as the Palestinians set up.

There are in fact two realities: the reality of historic fact and the reality of present Islamic and Palestinian terrorist EVIL.

And so President Trump said this:

Jerusalem is today and must remain a place where Jews pray at the Western Wall, where Christians walk the stations of the cross, and where Muslims worship at Al Aqsa Mosque. However, through all of these years, presidents representing the United States have declined to officially recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. In fact, we have declined to acknowledge any Israeli capital at all.

But today we finally acknowledge the obvious. That Jerusalem is Israel’s capital. This is nothing more or less than a recognition of reality. It is also the right thing to do. It’s something that has to be done.

But there are people who are owned and operated by Satan, by the prince of the power of the air, people who have “followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient” (Ephesians 2:2).  And these people are no more capable of receiving or comprehending genuine reality than a cockroach is capable of building a rocket that can land roaches on the moon and assure their safe return to earth.

And these people have played their stupid, pathetic political games year after year, decade after decade.

In President Trump’s words:

Yet, for over 20 years, every previous American president has exercised the law’s waiver, refusing to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem or to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital city. Presidents issued these waivers under the belief that delaying the recognition of Jerusalem would advance the cause of peace. Some say they lacked courage but they made their best judgments based on facts as they understood them at the time. Nevertheless, the record is in.

After more than two decades of waivers, we are no closer to a lasting peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.

It would be folly to assume that repeating the exact same formula would now produce a different or better result.

Therefore, I have determined that it is time to officially recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

While previous presidents have made this a major campaign promise, they failed to deliver.

Today, I am delivering. I’ve judged this course of action to be in the best interests of the United States of America and the pursuit of peace between Israel and the Palestinians. This is a long overdue step to advance the peace process. And to work towards a lasting agreement.

Israel is a sovereign nation with the right, like every other sovereign nation, to determine its own capital. Acknowledging this is a fact is a necessary condition for achieving peace. It was 70 years ago that the United States under President Truman recognized the state of Israel.

Ever since then, Israel has made its capital in the city of Jerusalem, the capital the Jewish people established in ancient times.

Today, Jerusalem is the seat of the modern Israeli government. It is the home of the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, as well as the Israeli Supreme Court. It is the location of the official residence of the prime minister and the president. It is the headquarters of many government ministries.

For decades, visiting American presidents, secretaries of State and military leaders have met their Israeli counterparts in Jerusalem, as I did on my trip to Israel earlier this year.

In other words, it was reality, everyone understood the reality, but lying dissemblers based on the foundations of a rapist have suppressed the truth and have played games.  And for decades we have gone nowhere with no peace.

The Word of God delivered to Jeremiah the prophet declared:

They offer superficial treatments for my people’s mortal wound. They give assurances of peace when there is no peace.  — Jeremiah 6:14

That is what these fools – and the Bible calls them out for the fools they are – have been doing year after year, decade after decade.

One shining example of the utter hypocrisy and depravity of this “peace when there IS no peace” position is Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein.  This hypocrite was one of the “lifers” who were in the Senate and voted for the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995.  And so we have this piece of a preening coward who has pretended to stand for something for much of her political career, but who in actuality stands for NOTHING:

(CNSNews.com) – Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein has written to President Trump, urging him not to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel or to announce he is moving the U.S. Embassy to the city.

Exactly six months ago Tuesday, the senior senator from California voted in favor of a resolution commemorating the 50th anniversary of Israel’s reunification of Jerusalem, and calling on the president to “abide by” the provisions of the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act.

That 1995 legislation said Jerusalem should be recognized as Israel’s capital, and required the president to move the embassy from Tel Aviv by May 31, 1999. Feinstein, the eighth-longest serving senator, voted in favor of it on Oct. 24, 1995.

And the same damn people who claim that we ought to continue to pursue a model built on the very definition of insanity – doing the same stupid thing over and over and expecting a different result – are the people who first gave North Korea the framework to build nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles to deliver those weapons and even gave them more than 4 billion dollars to build it; and then gave the terrorist regime Iran the framework to build nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles to deliver those weaponswith secret side-deals that literally amount to treason against the United states of America that make what is obviously bad on its face purely evil – and gave them hundreds of millions of dollars CASH in a secret plane like drug dealers in what was on its face clearly an illegal ransom payment to buy the technology from North Korea.  In fact, the total amount Obama gave Iran is a terrifying $1.7 billion that Iran has already used for terrorist purposes.  But the same world that will never the simple statement of Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel likewise never recognized that Bill Clinton’s deal and the billions of dollars and the construction of nuclear reactors that North Korea used to build nuclear weapons and likewise will also never recognize that Obama’s similar deal with terrorist state Iran will ultimately guarantee that they have nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles to deliver them to the United States and of course to Israel.  Any more than cockroaches will land on the moon, plant their little roach flag, and then return safely back to earth in their roach rocket.

The Word of God is crystal clear that the land in question is the land of Israel and the home of the Jewish people.  And that Jerusalem is the sacred capitol of that land.

I celebrate with all devout Jews that their God is faithful and that President Donald Trump finally restored honor to the U.S. government after 22 years of hypocrisy and deceit.

Sexual Harassment Firestorm And The True Problem That Has Been Mocked By The Left: It’s Something Called ‘Sin’ And ‘Our Sin Nature’

November 30, 2017

I’ll just say up front where I’m going with this.  We obviously have a problem with sexual harassment and abuse, but if you think Republicans are bad, just realize that Democrats are proving themselves to be truly evil.  You won’t find a story describing the number of Republicans facing charges of harassment or abuse compared to the number of Democrats currently facing those charges because there are a LOT of Democrats currently facing those charges and the media protects and shelters Democrats just as they did when Bill Clinton was being accused of these things and much, much worse.  And, to continue,  if you think it’s bad in America, go to a country that does not have a Judeo-Christian tradition to see what sexual harassment and abuse truly looks like – and you will be shocked at how good America is by comparison.  I am going to submit to you that the problem is sin and our sin nature, and that sexuality is deep within the beast that is man, and the only way to get the man to reign in the beast is to literally scare the hell out of him.  Which is impossible when that man has been steeped in a worldview that ridicules hell.  Again, sexuality burns hot and deep in the beast that is man; and if there is no God, if there is no heaven and no hell, then there is nothing – NOTHING – beyond your opinion versus my opinion.  A partisan vote or a media propaganda poll or for that matter a legitimate vote or opinion poll among human beings has NOTHING to do with what is right or wrong: a majority doesn’t make right any more than might makes right.  But when we return to the realization that yes, we ARE all truly created in the Imago Dei, and that male and female He created us, then we have the basis for not only returning to a culture that veers back from the vile sexual values that secular liberal human progressives have been perverting us into, but a true foundation built on God and upon eternal truths that are truly right and there are things that are truly evil.  And that abusing a girl or a woman created in God’s image is in the category of evil even if a lot of people disagree.  We have a degenerate problem and we desperately need a transcendent solution.  That’s my synopsis.

It wasn’t all that long ago that Vice President Mike Pence made a statement that shouldn’t have garnered him anything but respect and even praise, but instead resulted in widespread ridicule and condemnation: he said that he would not be alone with a woman not his wife and would never attend any event with alcohol if his wife were not with him.

And he was actually condemned and demonized for that.

The liberal Washington Post argued as it’s headline title that “Pence’s unwillingness to be alone with a woman is a symptom of a bigger problem.”  And stated:

It’s easy to make jokes about, and it’s also easy to argue that this is nobody’s business but the Pences’. But there’s a deeply troubling worldview at work here, one that has profound implications for policy — and we’re already seeing it play out at both the state and federal levels.

Let’s take just a moment to consider this pair of rules Mike Pence has for himself. He obviously thinks that every interaction he has with a woman is so sexually charged that it’s safe to be around them only if there are other people there, too. Unless someone might be drinking, in which case even the presence of a crowd isn’t enough to prevent … something from happening. There’s little distance between that perspective and that of the ultra-Orthodox Jews who refuse to sit next to a woman on an airplane, or the fundamentalist Muslims who demand that women be covered head to toe to contain the unstoppable sexual allure that renders men unable to control their urges.

That was March 30 of this year.

Pence was stating that he would never allow himself to be in a position where he could harass or abuse a woman, nor would he ever allow himself to be in a position where he could ever be accused either rightly or wrongly for having harassed or abused a woman.  He would represent himself as a man of integrity.  And truly despicable people slimed him for it.

May I offer something that no liberal progressive will never comprehend called “moral clarity”???  The accusation that Mike Pence stating that he made a moral decision to govern his own behavior is akin to Islamic culture forcing women to cover themselves displays a degree of such moral idiocy and frankly such political bias that it is so far beneath contempt to be unreal.  When it comes to morality and moral decency, liberal progressives are literally both schizophrenic and psychotic.  They have no grasp of moral reality whatsoever.

What Mike Pence did is wrong, not allowing himself to be alone with a woman who isn’t his wife.  Restraining his own conduct that way.  Far, FAR better to be a liberal like Matt Lauer and have a damn button on his desk he can push to lock a door so he CAN be alone with a married woman who is not his wife and rape her until she passes out.

All the moral wisdom and moral clarity of liberalism in one bite.

The Washington Post is a discredited partisan witch-hunting band of propagandist hacks, but let’s take the roof off of what they were claiming in light of the avalanche of sexual harassment charges that began since one of the Democratic Party’s biggest donors got revealed as basically a serial rapist.

I’m going to say a few things about Roy Moore now: first being that, very unlike Democrats with first Al Franken (even with photographs of the turd in the act proving his guilt) and then John Conyers (who acknowledged his guilt in a legal settlement for sexual harassment), Republicans IMMEDIATELY distanced themselves from Roy Moore.  Oh, no, you did NOT have a Majority Leader Mitch McConnell attempt to justify Moore hanging around the way we awkwardly watched a Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi try to justify the unjustifiable.

Now, Roy Moore’s people have poked some serious holes in many of the accuser’s verifiable statements.  Interestingly, I wouldn’t mind if the entire case against Moore stood or fell on the alleged yearbook signature that it is claimed Moore signed in the high school yearbook of the woman making the most serious accusation.  Her attorney, famous legal hack Gloria Allred, refuses to allow ANY legitimate unbiased inspection of that yearbook, acknowledges as an officer of the court that she refused to ask her client if she actually saw Roy Moore sign her yearbook, because the answer might destroy her case, and refused Wolf Blitzer’s repeated demand to claim whether or not the signature is legitimateMultiple other witnesses have specifically refuted the account of a different Roy Moore accuser who claims Moore sexually assaulted her behind a restaurant.  There comes a point when maybe you’ve got a valid right to question 40 year-old claims of sexual abuse that come out one month before a critical US Senate race when one side claims to have evidence that it WILL NOT release to prove or disprove assertions.

Amazingly, ABC News immediately “reached out” to all 52 Republicans for their reaction to the allegations against Roy Moore.  I could find no example of any major media outlet attempting to pin down THE 46 Democrats and the 2 supposedly “independents” who always cast their vote with the Democrats on their reaction to Al Franken and the numerous allegations against him.  Some of which are evidenced by PHOTOGRAPHS of Franken IN THE ACT.  The Republican example was THE very top hit on the page to answer my Google search.  Whereas I looked through six pages of Google hits when I changed the search phrase from Senators Republicans respond Roy Moore to Senators Democrats respond Al Franken.  The closest thing I could find was from a source called “conservativereview.com.”  Which pointed out that at the time of its article, not ONE Democrat Senator had called for Al Franken to resign.  Rather, the only call was for a “Senate ethics investigation” which has never ONCE failed to expel a Senator since 1861 no matter how heinous any Senator ever acted.  For the record, the one “journalistic” news agency that most definitely did NOT “reach out” to all the Democrats in the Senate over Al Franken was ABC News which immediately played that trick to Republicans over Moore.

It’s this shameless trick the mainstream media plays over and over again, dating back to Walter Cronkite and even way before Old Man Walter who we found out was a doctrinaire liberal and slanted the news like a doctrinaire liberal before another doctrinaire liberal named Dan Rather tried to falsely frame George W. Bush with doctored documents.

The reason Republicans are so often utter cowards is because whenever anybody says or does anything offensive in our culture, you can bet that the media will cavalry itself over to every single Republican for a reaction and force them to go on the record fer or agin.  You never see that behavior with the media when the offensive words or deeds would embarrass Democrats.

But wait, you say.  Liberalism means respect for women.

Tell that to Al Franken and his now six so-far sexual assault accusers.  In uberleftist California, tell that to the 140 women who have described “a pervasive culture of misconduct in state government” by liberal Democrats such as Raul Bocanegra and Tony Mendoza.  Tell that to the multiple staffers of Rep. John Conyers.  Oh, wait, I’m sorry, fellow black Democrat James Clyburn says all those women were all white, and you know how them cracker bitches all lie.  So scratch them because Democrats are now as racist as they are rapist.  It was because cracker bitches are all stupid liars that prompted House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to give an utterly incoherent defense of ConyersBut she’s been a holier-than-thou faux feminist Democrat who only sees evil in conservatives all her life.

Or we can take a trip down the pages of history and tell the story of liberals’ championing women.  Tell that to “the Lion of the Senate,” Ted Kennedy, who abandoned a woman to horribly and slowly die alone in the dark and cold of a watery grave.  A better term for Senator Kennedy would be “the senator of sleaze who was a drunk sexual bully.”  Tell that to Bill Clinton, hard-core sexual predator and rapist as even the New York Times is being forced to acknowledge by the standards that liberals tried to exclusively apply only to others.  We can take that same memory train when liberal progressives FIERCELY defended rapists and even child rapists like Roman Polanksi – who was adored and defended and celebrated and eulogized after drugging and sodomizing a 13-year old girl (something Roy Moore has not been accused of doing, fwiw).  Hey, let’s watch Hollywood adore this child rapist and tell me the likelihood of whether Judge Roy Moore who didn’t sodomize any young girls to the best of my knowledge would get such an ovation from this crowd:

“But he’s… he’s an ARTIST!” the left says. You know, because Beyoncé shouldn’t be forced to write or sing music condemning homosexuality the way that other artists like wedding photographers and bakers and custom-designers ought to be forced to condone the homosexuality that flagrantly flies in the face of their Christian biblical values. Because “art” is subjective, you see, and only liberalism qualifies as the sole critic of “art.” Mind you, Hollywood has been as racist as they have been religiously bigoted, with back-to-back years of all white nominees until political correctness forced them to pick some token negroes.

You have to apply a different standard to liberal progressives.  They’re better than everyone else, you see.  They deserve special treatment.  In fact, the class that creates “entitlements” are “entitled” to special treatment.  I know that Hitler ruined the term “master race” for everyone, and so we have to come up with a different name to describe what liberal progressives think of themselves.

Harvey Weinstein was one of damn near every single liberal progressive male in THE most liberal progressive industry in the world who routinely sexually abused women.  Think back to Bill Cosby, who endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 and said that those who opposed Barack Obama were “racists” in 2013.  Before his 2015 criminal charges.  What a damn miserable loathsome roach you are, Dr. Huckstable.

As we think of how vile the mainstream media is – and it is VILE, isn’t it NBC anchor Matt Lauer, CBS anchor Charlie Rose, NPR news chief Michael Oreskes, New York Times political reporter Glenn Thrush, and political analyst Mark Halperin – consider the fact that 96 percent of media political campaign donations went to Hillary Clinton.  Remember this of Halperin and the in-your-FACE bias of ABC:

And now ABC News has left in place its Political Director Mark Halperin. ABC has done this despite the network’s acknowledgement that Halperin wrote a memo that to many seems to direct ABC reporters, anchors and producers to slant its coverage by downplaying the misstatements of Democratic presidential candidate Senator John Kerry and by viewing negatively any misstatements by Republican candidate Bush.

I’ve been saying it for years now.  These people are as dishonest as the sun is hot.

Not that the sun has anything whatsoever to do with global warming, mind you.  Heat, as we all know, is entirely produced by man and specifically through CO2 – a substance that scientifically stupid people idiotically believe is necessary for trees and for life – but really is a poison that should be banned even though anthropogenic CO2 is responsible for less than 0.1 of one percent of the greenhouse effect.

And now think of who was administering that bias.  Take a moment to realize that when conservatives called these people “fake news,” it amounted to FLATTERY compared to what they truly are and always have been.  Because all these people who are such miserable roaches it is beyond unreal get to write our news for us.  These morally-diseased slimebags get to tell us what is true and what is false.

Democrats and liberal progressives didn’t bat an eye when Hillary Clinton received tens of millions of dollars from countries that systematically abuse women.

And now we all know why: because all the damn liberal progressives were systematically abusing women, too.

Just remember what the Democratic Party taught us just in the 90s alone: that a young woman getting on her knees to give a powerful man blowjobs in the workplace office is perfectly A-OK, and that all the women who accuse such powerful men of any misconduct are trailer trash and you can patently disregard anything they say.

Women are good for one thing and to do that one thing they need to do only two things: get on their knees and open their mouths.  But not to talk.  Every single Democrat – EVERY SINGLE ONE – taught America that fact in 1999.

And the mainstream media helped them write that truth and repackage it into something entirely different than what it actually was.

Let’s not leave out another very top Democrat Party machine: the tech industry.  Like all the rest of liberal progressives, the tech industry is a woman-abusing machine, too.

Ninety-nine percent of the woman-abusing tech industry’s campaign donations went to Hillary Clinton.

We can look at the college and university campuses that are steeped in secular humanist progressive liberalism and see the shocking statistics of sexual assault.  Their very own worldview created this toxic system.  There’s been a more than 200% increase in assaults on college campuses; and women are more likely to be sexually assaulted on those bastions of secular humanist progressive liberal values than damn near anywhere else.

We can now also look – sadly – at our military and see how the secular humanist, liberal progressive policies of Barack Obama made our military machine a stinking bed of sexual assault and sexual harassment.  It absolutely SKYROCKETED under Obama’s watch, most especially during Obama’s 2nd term – where as he told the Russian president while he was colluding with Russia on a hot microphone, “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”  And Obama EXPLOITED that “flexibility” in incredibly vile ways.  The dishonest mainstream media says that Obama was “fighting” sexual harassment/assault.  Baloney: both SKYROCKETED under him because of his policies as Obama abandoned all history, all tradition, all religion, all science about human biology, and imposed politically correct dogma as some kind of “solution.”

Just like in the Obama military, the vile record of sexual assault on secular humanism-dominated college campuses TRIPLED during Obama’s second term.

Now the amazing thing is that most women vote for this.

Now, I have just in the space above categorically demonstrated and documented that liberal progressives have absolutely no right and no platform to lecture anyone about the treatment of women or what is good or bad for women.  They themselves are a massive part of the damn problem.

If liberal progressives or Democrats want to pretend that the answer lies in education or “sexual harassment training,” allow me to simply state from the outset that the very ones “training” everyone else are themselves sexual predators and sexual harassers.

And anyone who wants to tell me that “we need more women” has to deal with the fact that women have overwhelmingly voted for these horrible, awful people.  Women are part of this too.  And women are corrupt.  I think of all the women who knew damn well what was going on and kept their mouths shut because the rapists and the sexual harassers were Democrats and they were ideologues who put their politics first and everything else second.

I think of liberal “journalist” Cokie Roberts who said that she knew for YEARS that John Conyers was a serial sexual harasser or worst and that “We all knew to avoid getting in an elevator with Rep. Conyers.”  But he was a Democrat, so we just took the stairs, let him prey on the stupid girls who didn’t know not to get in that elevator, and kept our mouths shut.  Because to open our mouths around Democrat men involves a penis being shoved in.  But we sure weren’t going to out this Democrat.

And the reason is that liberal-progressive so-called “feminists” have indoctrinated the belief that “being a woman” is numerically identical to “being a baby murderer,” such that if you don’t murder babies or believe that human life ought to have any sacred dignity whatsoever, you cannot qualify as a “woman.”

Mind you, these same liberal-progressive so-called “feminists” have arbitrarily decided that any man who decides he’s a woman IS a woman.

Understand that there are consequences to the idea that there is nothing whatsoever that is sacred about the dignity of human life.

Just like Nazism, an idea that began decades before the death camps and Zyclon B, ideas have consequences.

You cannot deny humanity and not have that evil ultimately emerge.

According to evolution, there is nothing special or sacred or dignified about you.  According to evolution:

humans are a tiny little twig representing one species among so many millions on this enormous arborescent tree of life

And any unwillingness to accept evolution merely:

represent our unwillingness to give up on the notion that there is meaning out there expressed in human terms, which is a kind of ultimate hubris.

Try to comprehend that any “morality” is a fabrication:

Asian Homo erectus died without issue and does not enter our immediate ancestry (for we evolved from African populations); Neanderthal people were collateral cousins, perhaps already living in Europe while we emerged in Africa… In other words, we are an improbable and fragile entity, fortunately successful after precarious beginnings as a small population in Africa, not the predictable end result of a global tendency. We are a thing, an item of history, not an embodiment of general principles.

Ah, yes, arguments of moral worth in evolutionary terms come up with the reasoning of Joseph Goebbels:

Certainly the Jew is also a Man, but the Flea is also an Animal.

Stephen Jay Gould phrased the worldview bluntly, stating that “there’s no reason humans are ‘higher’ life forms than bacteria or insects” [in Biography Magazine, March 1998, page 110].

A female is a human being, but the embryo is also a Homo Sapiens.  And that argument is actually true where Goebbels’ is intellectual evolutionary gibberish only if evolution is true and God is not.  Otherwise, we make up our own rules: the Jew is human if we allow the Jew to be human and the Jew is not human if we decide by popular vote or by dictator’s decree is not.  Barack Obama gave us all a classic example of this when he assured us that marriage was between one man and one woman until he decided it wasn’t.

It’s not enough to say that there is no meaning, no value and no purpose apart from a Creator God: there is no POSSIBILITY of any ultimate meaning, value or purpose apart from God.  And that is a rigorously proven fact.

Fact: there is a God OR it is perfectly appropriate to rape women; versus the Bible which has a decidedly different view:

In a  recent book, A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion,10 authors Randy Thornhill and Craig T. Palmer claim that rape is “a natural, biological phenomenon that is a product of the human evolutionary heritage,” just like “the leopard’s spots and the giraffe’s elongated neck.” In other words, rape is a biological “adaptation” that allows undesirable males the opportunity to pass on their genes. According to Randy Thornhill, “Every feature of every living thing, including human beings, has an underlying evolutionary background. That’s not a debatable matter.” According to the anthropology department at the University of California Santa Barbara, “That rape might be an adaptation is a reasonable hypothesis to pursue, and the proper framework is intersexual conflict.”11 If rape is just an evolutionary adaptation, then how can it be immoral?

The Bible says that morality is a result of choices that people make, and not the result of some conditioned evolutionary response. Is there any experimental evidence supporting this viewpoint? In a newly released book, Three Seductive Ideas, Harvard University psychologist, Jerome Kagan, makes the claim (and backs it up with experimental evidence) that humans are radically different from every other species of life on earth. Dr. Kagan refutes the ideas of evolutionary psychologists, including “infant determinism” (the idea that all human behavior is set by age 2) hedonism (the idea that all human behavior is motivated by a desire to maximize pleasure and minimize pain), and “abstractionism” (the idea that all human behavior is controlled by a limited set of laws or rules). He points out that men who committed terrible atrocities had loving parents during their childhood years and that “evolutionary arguments are used to cleanse greed, promiscuity, and abuse of stepchildren of moral taint.” Instead, Dr. Kagan shows that humans are a special creation, endowed with a spiritual nature, and motivated by a desire to maintain a feeling of virtue, which is unique among sentient animals. He points out that there are no non-human animal models for human pride, shame, and guilt. Humans also appreciate the difference between moral right and wrong. According to Dr. Kagan, “Not even the cleverest ape could be conditioned to be angry upon seeing one animal steal food from another.” According to a recent review of the book in Science, “The idea of the duality of human nature (of meaning over and above mechanism, or mind over and above mechanism, of angel over and above beast), and of the remarkable discontinuity of human nature from everything that came before, is alive and well for Kagan precisely because he has such a high regard for facts.”12

The Bible makes a startling claim about human nature and it makes that startling claim over and over again:

  • Now the earth was corrupt in the sight of God, and the earth was filled with violence.  God looked on the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way upon the earth — Genesis 6:11-12
  • For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God — Romans 3:23
  • “When they sin against You (for there is no man who does not sin) and You are angry with them and deliver them to an enemy, so that they take them away captive to the land of the enemy, far off or near — 1 Kings 8:46
  • as it is written, “THERE IS NONE RIGHTEOUS, NOT EVEN ONE — Romans 3:10
  • For all of us have become like one who is unclean, And all our righteous deeds are like a filthy garment; And all of us wither like a leaf, And our iniquities, like the wind, take us away. — Isaiah 64:6
  • Indeed, there is not a righteous man on earth who continually does good and who never sins.  — Ecclesiastes 7:20

I could go on and on.  Interestingly, there are far more verses that point out that sin is universal to human nature and that we are all sinners than there are in the New Testament.  Look at these passages for yourselves.

There is a God.  That is why we are held to an objective moral standard which does not change the way secular – or should I now start calling it “sexular” – humanist liberal progressive pseudo-morality changes practically every damn day.  There simply is no such thing as “objective morality” to a liberal.  There are zero grounds for that.  “Morality” for them is an opinion poll, and usually from a doctored survey, at that. And so, no, there is nothing objectively morally wrong with rape or any other kind of sexual harassment with liberal progressives, according to their moral system.  And to whatever extent they even actually HAVE a “moral system,” they are so hypocritical and filled with so many perverted double-talking double standards that we are right to mock these self-righteous preening modern-day Pharisees for whatever “morality” they now claim to stand for.

There IS something called “sin,” and we are ALL guilty of it.  Some of us are more guilty than others, and yes, I truly do believe that there will be levels of reward in heaven and there will be levels of suffering in hell.  But there is something called “sin,” and sin is anything we think, say or do that is in violation with the character of God because:

God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.  — Genesis 1:27

And our holy, righteous Creator holds us each and every one accountable to the image of God, the Imago Dei, that He instilled every single human being with.

That is why we are ALL valuable as human beings, male and female, and it is why Democrats are murderers to the tune of 60 million babies which is tenfold more murderous than the Nazis in the Holocaust and counting.

The Bible tells us that “it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment” (Hebrews 9:27).  The Bible tells us that “God sees not as man sees, for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7).  We’re told that God “will bring every act to judgment, everything which is hidden, whether it is good or evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:14).  On the last day, on Judgment Day, that every human being whether small or great will face, every act, every thought, every intent, every word will be revealed and will be judged.  And God will not allow even ONE sin, one sinner whose sins are detected, into His heaven.  Atheists and Secular humanist liberal progressives mock this and viciously attack the God of the Bible.  They call Him “judgmental,” which is a VERY JUDGMENTAL thing for them to do, especially given HE has the right to judge them as their Creator and they don’t have the right to judge HIM.  But the reality of heaven and the reality of the other destiny of hell are the basis for any true morality.  Why should I be good and not evil?  Why should I be good and not evil if I am powerful in this world and can get away with it?  One reason: because “you may be sure that your sin will find you out” (Numbers 32:23).

Let me contrast this with the teachings of Jesus.  Most people don’t know this, and the disinformation-hate-spewing dogma toward Christianity by the secular humanist liberal progressive “education system” will never tell you: but Jesus had FEMALE disciples.  Matthew chapter 28 and Luke chapter 24 records that the very first eyewitnesses to the Resurrected Jesus were WOMEN.  We have several of these women named in Luke 24:10: Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, as well as other women who followed Jesus.  What is interesting is that women were not allowed to testify in Jewish court during the time of Jesus, but Jesus allowed the honor that his very first witnesses be women.  Jesus TAUGHT women, which was UNHEARD Of for a Jewish rabbit during the time of Jesus.   The word for “disciple” is used in its feminine form to describe female Christians in Acts 9:36.  Jesus was a true revolutionary who restored to women the rights and freedoms they should have had as co-image-bearers of God (Gen 1:27).  The New Testament repeatedly warns Christians, most especially men, to avoid things like “fornication” and “adultery” that secular humanist liberal progressives openly mock and revile and ridicule.

Women do not need secular humanist progressive liberalism or the Democratic Party that champions that vile worldview: what women need is JESUS and the Christianity that truly seeks to follow their Lord and their Savior.

One of the things that liberalism gave us is rampant pornography and the pornification of our culture.  There are ALL KINDS of studies that document on this degraded and despicable act of Democratic Party liberalism upon our culture and upon the male mind.  Quote from a Harvard study:

The first way in which pornography undermines some males’ internal inhibitions against acting out their desires to rape is by objectifying women.

To whatever extent that “feminists” today are starting to turn on pornography as a demon that feeds male lust and reduces male inhibitions to carry out the desires they were taught watching degrading pornography, the same school of “feminism” was saying the EXACT opposite thing, claiming that “we have a right to our bodies!” and with the assistance of Democrat-appointed judges who professed abject moral stupidity in being unable to see a difference between porn and art they imposed this incredibly toxic, cancerous worldview and sexually-depraved view on our culture.  When Christians who wanted to follow the clear teachings of the Holy Bible pleaded with secular humanist liberal progressives, please don’t DO this awful thing!

Please understand, the Greek/New Testament word translated “fornication” that secular humanist progressive liberals and Democrats have mocked and ridiculed is “pornea.”  You’re not that dumb to not see where I’m clearly going, and where Christians went in the 1970s when morally depraved and morally stupid liberals declared it to be harmless and a right (even as they argued that the clear rights given to Americans in the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution are NOT rights!).  Liberal justices invented this “right” out of perverted ideology.  And it has toxified our culture.  And today the same Democrats who began the process of degrading and perverting our culture continue full-speed ahead as they ignore all legitimate biological science to similarly INVENT new sexual genders and orientations on a nearly daily basis now.  For the record, God created TWO and ONLY two: they are called “male and female.”

For the scientific record, that same legitimate biological science also tells us that when a male sperm cell and a female egg are joined together, they form a genetically unique human being that is therefore genetically different from the mother or the father.  It is NOT “your body.”  It is a separate and unique child’s body.  That zygote is a being by virtue of the fact that it is alive and it is human by virtue of its parents: IT IS A HUMAN BEING.  And any legitimate scientific analysis of the cells of that human being would reveal an organism that is rigorously scientifically classified in the following manner:

Kingdom-Animal
Phylum-chordata
Class-Mammalia
Order-Primate
Family-Hominid
Genus-Homo
Species-Sapiens

Just like you and me, pal.  A zygote is a human being in an embryonic stage as much as a teenager is a human being in an adolescent stage.  And any parent can tell you there is FAR more justifiable reason to kill the latter than there is the former.

Abortion, pornography, easy divorce all contributed to abort fatherhood in our culture.

Abortion is based on the premise that at the moment of conception – and literally even up to the very moment of delivery – that is NOT a baby in the womb; that is NOT a precious human being. It’s a thing inside a woman’s body and so it’s her property and so she can kill it. And so at the moment of conception, does a father father a child? No! Not if abortion is legitimate!!! He has merely contributed to an inanimate, nonsentient lump of goop and nothing more. And what is his “fatherhood” worth when the thing he conceived is a worthless thing that can be killed at a whim?

In Satan’s hatred for God and contempt for Fatherhood, fathers are NOT fathers and have NO right to their children. Given that fatherhood has been trivialized to nothing, given that fathers are now denied the most basic right to even the very life of their own children, given the destruction of what was once the sacred bond of marriage, the glue that kept fathers cemented to their families has been dissolved.

In our popular culture pumped out by Hollywood, men and particularly fathers are further reduced to useless imbeciles only good for mockery. Males and masculinity is pretty much blamed for every ill there is. Our leftist politicians and academics have pitted women against men and declared that men are responsible for every evil in the world. In the public schools we have seen secular humanism’s war against men warp into a war against boys. And these forces have combined to fundamentally distort and warp our very notion of what it even means to be a male, to be a man. While increasingly there IS no father at home to tell these children anything different: 39% of America’s children between first and twelfth grade live in homes without a father today.

Let me tell you something: Democrats LOVE the fact that they have warped our culture into one composed of single, unmarried women who live in homes without the father of their child/ren.  Because they have exploited these women their policies created such that 70% of single, unmarried women vote DEMOCRAT.

Understand something, single, unmarried woman: Democrats are sick, twisted, perverted, warped people who do not WANT you to be happy, do not WANT your children to grow up stable, do not WANT you to have a dream of living in your own home with your loving husband who is the father of your beautiful, well-adjusted children.  Because you would vote these DemocRats right out of office.  And that is simply a statistical fact.  The longer DEMOn-possessed-bureauCRATS can keep you down, women, the longer they can isolate you, keep you without a husband and a father to your kids, the longer they can keep you in grinding poverty, on welfare, desperate, without a true man to love you and keep you and stay beside you, the longer you will keep giving them what they want.

Anyway, the problem is something that secular humanist liberal progressives mock is spelled S-I-N.  And we are ALL sinners.  So let me get back to Roy Moore.  Yes, it is possible he did what the women accusers claim he did going back forty years ago.  Sin extends to all human beings.  Even Christians.  The Bible teaches that unbelievers have a sin nature and believers have two natures: the godly nature that comes from the Holy Spirit and the old human natures.  And we have to learn how to reign in our old sinful natures that remain with us.  And that includes our sexual “issues.”

We are sinners, and sinners need a Savior.  We need Jesus.  The Bible assures us that God created us in His image, and part of that image is eternity.  The Bible says that God set eternity in our hearts (Ecclesisates 3:11).  God created heaven and God created hell.  Both are real.  Our destiny is to be in one or the other.  And the thing is that God cannot allow any sin – ANY sin – into heaven or heaven, which is perfect, cannot be heaven.  And so everyone and everything that is allowed into heaven will be morally pure and perfect.

But the Bible says quite clearly that we are all sinners.  Which is quite a problem for us, one that we cannot solve or hope to solve on our own.  God created us and created us in HIS image.  And we are held accountable to that image.

But the Bible also teaches us that the very God who created us in His image assumed OUR image, added a human nature to His deity, and came to earth to represent sinful humanity.  And while we all sinned, Christ Jesus never sinned once in anything He ever thought, said or did.  He perfectly represented the sinless, pure righteousness of a holy Creator God.  And we can have our sins washed away by His blood because after living that perfect life on our behalf, representing me, He died to pay for my sins.  Because the wages of sin is death (Romans 3:23).  And so Jesus conquered the power of sin, and because He is God and death cannot hold God, Jesus rose again bodily from the dead.  And He conquered the power of sin and the power of death.  And therefore my eternal destiny is heaven because my sins do not exist when God looks at me through the perfect righteousness of Christ.

And when I believe that, when I believe that Christ died for my sins according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3), and that He rose again from the dead according to the Scriptures (1 Cor 15:4), and I declare that with my mouth in faith, something happens.  Yes, you can still sin, but now there is also a new nature implanted within you, a nature that unlike your sin nature does NOT want to sin, but to obey the Christ who placed that nature within you.  Jesus told us that the Holy Spirit within us convicts us of sin and righteousness and judgment (John 16:8-10).  Unlike the “righteousness” of secular humanist liberal progressives, this righteousness and sin and judgment are NOT based on constantly shifting human standards that mean nothing, but come from the character and nature and power of the Living Creator God who will one day hold every single human being who has ever been born to account.

And when I truly believe these things, when I truly have God’s Spirit living within me, there is simply something inside me that won’t let me do the things we see in our culture.

If there is no hell, there are no consequences for evil. And there is absolutely no reason not to allow evil to have free reign. The bottom line is this: all atheism requires is to believe there is no God and all agnosticism requires is to doubt God; in either case, there IS no moral system. There IS no moral disqualification to atheism or agnosticism. Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot and the Kim dynasty in North Korea were and are all perfectly fulfilled atheists who murdered well over 100 million innocent human beings JUST IN PEACETIME ALONE.  One can be a perfectly consistent atheist or agnostic and be a complete moral monster in a way that is impossible to be a Christian claiming to truly follow Jesus and be a moral monster.  Because Jesus was righteous and calls upon His followers to be righteous.  Any and all “moral” rules these people come up with are first of all self-serving and hypocritical and second of all nothing but shifting sand that will change as the winds of political correctness blow. Which is why Bill Clinton was never guilty of rape even though he had credible accusers and numerous instances of sexual assault and sexual harassment even though there were numerous accusers, but today Roy Moore was pilloried as guilty merely because women said something and therefore had to be believed. Even Hillary Clinton has implicitly acknowledged that by the standard that she currently espouses, her husband and the man who still most represents the Democratic Party and Democrat values belongs in a prison cell doing hard time for his outrageous and depraved violence toward women.  Back then, Democrats claimed that all the women who said Bill assaulted them or worse should NOT be believed, and mocked them by claiming that they were trailer trash.

If you think all this crap that you are seeing going on all around you is wrong, then you turn to the antidote to sin: you turn to the only way out of sin, past sin, through sin.  You turn to Jesus.

Liberal progressives have now thoroughly proven that their way may seem right to them and even to a depraved culture, but in the end it is the way of death (Proverbs 14:12).  The Bible warns about them and their ways: they say what God declares is evil and what they declare is good, but they are in for a terrifying end (Isaiah 5:20).

That’s the bottom line.  And liberals are themselves proving that what the Word of God declared centuries ago remains as true today as when God first declared it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

New Sex Charges Filed. Only Not Against Roy Moore, But Al Franken. AND SHE HAS PIC OF BEING GROPED WHILE ASLEEP!!!

November 16, 2017

Either Al Franken needs to resign or be impeached and expelled from the Senate with full Democratic Party participation, or Roy Moore needs to be elected.

I’ve watched the fiasco of the Roy Moore allegations – and Moore’s poor responses to those allegations – with growing horror.  But I am just as outraged that women would wait for 38 years to bring charges against a man who has been in public service for nearly his entire life – including a high profile Republican primary runoff in which Moore defeated a Republican candidate supported by Donald Trump and the entire GOP establishment – without saying so much as “boo.”  ONLY when Moore wins that runoff and ONLY when it is too late to even remove his name from the ballot according to Alabama law, does the self-acknowledged biased Washington Post put out this story.

I am forced to acknowledge that the Moore allegations might be true; but it is every bit as obvious that this was nothing short of a political hitjob where politics and ideology, rather than any issues with “women,” were at the heart of the left’s attack.

What is amazing to me now is that liberals and feminists are actually revisiting charges against Bill Clinton.  Remember him?  Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broaderick (among many other victims of Bill Clinton’s lust problems) sure do.  And back then, liberals and feminists rabidly supported Bill.  Because none of these “feminists” have ever ONCE given a flying damn about actual “women.”

In a November 13, 2017 New York Times piece entitled “I Believe Juanita” written by Michelle Goldberg, we have this stunning admission by a feminist:

Of the Clinton accusers, the one who haunts me is Broaddrick. The story she tells about Clinton recalls those we’ve heard about Weinstein. She claimed they had plans to meet in a hotel coffee shop, but at the last minute he asked to come up to her hotel room instead, where he raped her. Five witnesses said she confided in them about the assault right after it happened. It’s true that she denied the rape in an affidavit to Paula Jones’s lawyers, before changing her story when talking to federal investigators. But her explanation, that she didn’t want to go public but couldn’t lie to the F.B.I., makes sense. Put simply, I believe her.

Oh, Goldberg parses out some reasons why she didn’t believe Willey and Jones, with the later being just because she was supported by political opponents (which means she shouldn’t believe any of Roy Moore’s accusers, either).  But she now believes that Bill Clinton is not merely a sexual harasser, but an actual RAPIST.

This title from the leftist The Atlantic is pretty amazing:

Bill Clinton: A Reckoning: Feminists saved the 42nd president of the United States in the 1990s. They were on the wrong side of history; is it finally time to make things right?

Here we have an open acknowledgment from the left that feminists who “saved the 42nd president” were “on the wrong side of history.”  They weren’t on the wrong side of history; THEY WERE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF MORALITY.  Feminists blatantly and hypocritically sided with evil against good, and wrong against right.  Because all that really mattered to them, all that has EVER mattered to them, all that matters to them to this very day, as I will explain, is the ideological left rather than anything else.

A couple of days after these Nov 13 pieces, we had this on Nov 15 entitled “What About Bill?’ Sexual Misconduct Debate Revives Questions About Clinton” also in The New York Times:

The cultural conversation about women, power and sexual misconduct that has consumed the United States in recent weeks has now raised a question that is eagerly promoted by those on the political right just as it discomfits those on the political left: What about Bill? While Fox News and other conservative outlets revive years-old charges against Mr. Clinton to accuse Mr. Moore’s critics of hypocrisy, some liberals say it may be time to rethink their defense of the 42nd president.
Matthew Yglesias, a liberal blogger who once worked at the Center for American Progress, a pillar of the Clinton political world, wrote on Vox.com on Wednesday that “I think we got it wrong” by defending Mr. Clinton in the 1990s and that he should have resigned. Chris Hayes, the liberal MSNBC host, said on Twitter that “Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against him.”

According to the new morality of the left, versus what the Democrats, liberals and the left have been saying whether about Donald Trump or Roy Moore, is that every single Democrat who has EVER voted for Bill Clinton is a vile sexual predator and enabler of hate against women.  Buh-bye, Democrats.

We can properly argue that Roy Moore merely looked at what liberals and feminists and Democrats did for Bill and said, “I want me some of that!”

Let’s just understand something: this stuff dated November 13 are coming out now because of the stuff dated Novemeber 9 against Roy Moore.  And you’ve got a lot of very legitimately angry Republicans and conservatives pointing out that virtually ALL of the most rabidly angry Democrats coming out demanding Roy Moore be hung, drawn and quartered without so much benefit as any trial or any presumption of innocence whatsoever had a very different song to sing when Bill was a serial damned rapist getting blowjobs from young girls in the Oval Office.  Even his semen on her blue dress matching his DNA didn’t change Democrats’ tune.

They surrounded him and they protected him.

Remember Nina Burleigh, just one of many stunning examples that “journalism” in our nation is a sick, depraved JOKE, who said she would be “happy to give [Bill Clinton] a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.”  That was said AFTER the Paula Jones story broke!

That’s who these people REALLY are.

We’ve known this since Ted Kennedy let a woman named Mary Joe Kopechne slowly drown to death at Chappaquiddick in 1969 and be lionized as one of the great Democrats.  Because, Democrat, you are just like your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires.  You have been murderers since you started killing unborn babies by the tens of millions, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in you.  And when you lie, you speak your native language, for you are liars and of the father of lies.

To be a Democrat is to be a rabid hater of women.  And I say that not by my standard, BUT BY THEIR OWN.

Most of the haters of women who have been publicly revealed, such as Harvey Weinstein, are LIBERALS in a VERY LIBERAL INDUSTRY.

So let me explain why liberals and progressives and Democrats and feminists are turning on Bill Clinton [and Hillary] now.  The ONLY reason: BECAUSE THEY ARE DONE.  Democrats pathologically and rabidly protected Bill and Hillary while they mattered and while they were advancing the leftist agenda.  And now they are more of a liability than they are an asset.

And we’ve got this Roy Moore thing and a chance to steal the power balance in the Senate.  And that matters right now today.  But ohmigod, what we said about our perverts gives the other side the right and even the duty to shelter their perverts.  So let’s throw our old perverts under the bus and pretend that we somehow learned something and that will give us the right to scream for Roy Moore’s head in a way that guarantees us a STEAL for a Senate seat that we otherwise could never have possibly ever won.

Okay, but here’s the rub: his name is Al Franken.  And he’s a right-now pervert.

And we don’t have accusations: we have PICTURES!!!

The actress says that Al Franken kissed and groped her against her will and she has PROOF.

Here is part of her story against the Democratic Senator and hate-filled rabid leftist roach, the Honorable Al Franken:

As a TV host and sports broadcaster, as well as a model familiar to the audience from the covers of FHM, Maxim and Playboy, I was only expecting to emcee and introduce the acts, but Franken said he had written a part for me that he thought would be funny, and I agreed to play along.

When I saw the script, Franken had written a moment when his character comes at me for a ‘kiss’. I suspected what he was after, but I figured I could turn my head at the last minute, or put my hand over his mouth, to get more laughs from the crowd.

On the day of the show Franken and I were alone backstage going over our lines one last time. He said to me, “We need to rehearse the kiss.” I laughed and ignored him. Then he said it again. I said something like, ‘Relax Al, this isn’t SNL…we don’t need to rehearse the kiss.’

He continued to insist, and I was beginning to get uncomfortable.

He repeated that actors really need to rehearse everything and that we must practice the kiss. I said ‘OK’ so he would stop badgering me. We did the line leading up to the kiss and then he came at me, put his hand on the back of my head, mashed his lips against mine and aggressively stuck his tongue in my mouth.

I immediately pushed him away with both of my hands against his chest and told him if he ever did that to me again I wouldn’t be so nice about it the next time.

I walked away. All I could think about was getting to a bathroom as fast as possible to rinse the taste of him out of my mouth.

I felt disgusted and violated.

Al Franken claimed he was just being funny.  “Is that funny if she does that to your sister or to your daughter or to your wife,” Leeann Tweeden asked?

And you’re going to rabidly turn on him, Democrats, or you’re going to once again show that you are just as hypocrite and wrong and evil today as you were when you were backing your Rapist-in-Chief.

Al Franken needs to be forced to immediately resign from the U.S. Senate.  Period.  End of story.  Or get off your high horses about Roy Moore.

For the record, there is nothing in atheism that disqualifies one from atheism if he or she is morally depraved.  There are no grounds for “morality” in evolution.  The ONLY way to be a “bad atheist” is to start believing in a Creator God.  Rape is merely a historically successful method to survive according to “survival of the fittest,” according to which theory the fittest organisms are defined as those who leave behind the most offspring with the most partners and thereby alters the gene pool.  Don’t like that?  Then abandon atheism and secular humanism and start reading your Bible to look for a God who declares right from wrong because He created us in His image – male and female (Genesis 1:27) – and holds us accountable to His ways as His imagebearers.  And where the pagan gods of the pantheons were rapists, the God of the Bible is most certainly NOT.

If it turns out that Roy Moore committed these acts that he’s being accused of from four decades ago, then he violated everything that he professed to believe about Jesus and about the Christianity he claims.  And so I can definitively state that if Roy Moore treated women the way he is being accused of having done, he is a lousy Christian and a hypocrite who pretends to be something he isn’t.

But when a Barack Obama assures the American people that he is AGAINST gay marriage because he believes “as a Christian” that marriage is between one man and one woman, and then reverses himself, was Barack Obama the LORD God Almighty and Creator of the heavens and the earth who changed his mind???  All liberalism is – and you can add the pseudo-descriptor of “Christian” to liberalism – is constantly evolving moral hypocrisy.

Whenever you claim any connection whatsoever to Christianity or to Jesus Christ, you are liars, pure rank liars.  You have no standards or integrity, and any moral standards you claim are parasitic upon a faith that you have done everything to destroy with casual divorce laws, with homosexuality, with the abortion holocaust, with Government-as-God-and-Savior.  You stand for nothing.  Your feet are firmly planted in midair.  And even when you DO come to some moral realization, such as the fact that you all voted for a rapist, it is only a political pretense to help your cynical and craven political cause now.