Obama and Pakistan: So much for his “judgment”

It wasn’t too long ago that Barack Obama, wanting to sound tough, and not like a foreign-policy wuss, rattled the saber against Pakistan:

“I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges,” Obama said, “but let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”

it was a real ominous statement, and many conservatives jumped all over it: the man who would be willing to talk to enemies such as Iran and North Korea without preconditions was actually threatening to invade an ally like Pakistan.

It’s not very often that we get to see what would happen if a candidate for President’s foreign policy positions were actually put to the test (which is why a Barack Obama can talk so much smack in a campaign).  But we get to see so following the aftermath of President Bush taking Obama’s cue:

Pakistan could end support for U.S.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — The furor intensified Friday over Washington’s decision to pursue Islamic militant targets inside Pakistan, with opposition lawmakers threatening that the country could pull out of the war on terror if the United States refuses to respect its borders.

Now, Barack Obama has zealously attempted to saddle John McCain as representing “a third Bush term.”  But in this matter, it is Barack Obama – and most definitely NOT John McCain – who is “Bush-like”:

“Sen. John McCain of Arizona, close to clinching the GOP nomination, called Sen. Barack Obama ‘naive’ today and…blasted him for advocating a bombing of Al Qaeda hide-outs in Pakistan,” the Los Angeles Times reports.

“The best idea is not to broadcast what you’re going to do, that’s naive,” said McCain, who also questioned the very notion of “bombing Pakistan without their permission.” …

So here’s a pair of George Bush’s pants that YOU get to wear all by yourself, Mr. Barack Hussein – or should I say, Mr. Barry Bush?

This episode adds to Obama’s asinine policy of speaking to dictators without preconditions (which even Obama’s Democratic rivals for President ridiculed), his being totally wrong on the troop surge in Iraq (and then scrubbing his website in hopes that the public would forget just how wrong he was), his being for a Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel until he was against it, and his offering of moral equivalency in place of clear condemnation over Russia’s invasion of Democratic Georgia.

Sorry if I have to be the one to tell you this, but anybody looking for judgment in their President should be looking at John McCain.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Obama and Pakistan: So much for his “judgment””

  1. NoBama GA Says:

    Obama knows he was wrong all the way using the Iraq War to capture the Presidency. I use the word capture knowingly and literally. Have you noticed that he hardly ever refers to the war lately? His anti-war candidacy is gone since the surge. So what now? He must rebuild a candidacy and picked Macho Man. Tackle Pakistan’ or at least convince the Sheep who follow him that he can be Macho Man. There will be no action if he aver makes it to the White House. The man is a wimp with a loud mouth and has no substance whatsoever. He couldn’t serve a second term for Jimmy Carter even if you let him try.

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    As despicable as Obama has been in Iraq – and he HAS been despicable – he’s actually way down the list of despicable Democrats.


    It was the Democrats who were FOR the war before they were AGAINST it who most disgust me.

    But Obama is pathetic. Unlike McCain – who stood up for the surge virtually ALONE – Obama is a coward who will not stand up for his convictions if he thinks they will hurt him politically.

  3. Old Tennessee Says:

    Convictions? Obama? I may add to find convictions in Obama would be like looking for ethics in Obama. The concepts are mutually exclusive.

  4. Old Tennessee Says:

    Thanks Michael. I managed to get to those two sites. What detailed stuff? Wow! I will respond as soon as I have studied it.

  5. Michael Eden Says:

    I have posted those links in easily over a dozen articles, just hoping someone like you would read them and become as outraged over the Democrats’ treachery as I was when I first came across them.

    I never cease to be amazed when I read those quotes – and consider their flat-out treasonous condemnations of the very things they once claimed they themselves believed for nothing more than simple political expediency.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: