As Economy Continues Toward Toilet Bowl, Don’t Forget True Cost Of Failed Stimulus

There is increasing evidence mounting that Barack Obama’s $787 billion stimulus bill (the euphemistically-titled “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009” as opposed to “The Porkulus Act of 2009” or “The Generational Theft Act of 2009) has utterly failed to deliver anything that Obama promised.

As I reported in my article, “Obama Wreckovery Act And Stimulus ‘Employment’: The Pathetic Reality,” it has utterly failed to produce jobs.  In rushing the bill through Congress when unemployment was at 7.2%, Obama promised the country something that is now laughable: his administration assured America that the economic stimulus would prevent unemployment from rising above 8 percent.” It is now over 9.4%, and is expected to enter double-digit territory before the end of the year.

At the time that Obama was arguing that we needed a stimulus plan to avert total disaster, and assuring the country that his stimulus plan would keep unemployment under 8%, the Congressional Budget Office said that unemployment would only go to 9% by 2010 if we did absolutely nothing.  Which is another way of saying that not only has Obama’s stimulus not helped, but it has actually HURT the economy:

New jobless claims jump unexpectedly to 627,000; continuing claims rise to 6.74 million

By Christopher S. Rugaber, AP Economics Writer
On Thursday June 25,The Labor Department data released Thursday show jobs remain scarce even as the economy shows some signs of recovering from the longest recession since World War II.

The department said initial claims for jobless benefits rose last week by 15,000 to a seasonally adjusted 627,000. Economists expected a drop to 600,000, according to Thomson Reuters.

Several states reported more claims than expected from teachers, cafeteria workers and other school employees, a department analyst said.

The number of people continuing to receive unemployment insurance rose by 29,000 to 6.74 million, slightly above analysts’ estimates of 6.7 million.

To make it even more laughable, many of the very jobs that Barrack Obama had heralded as “saved” – including private sector jobs at Caterpillar and government sector jobs at the Columbus, Ohio police department – are the ones being wiped out.

But even though Obama’s stimulus has hurt the economy, it doesn’t change the fact that we’re still going to have to pay the bill for it.

And that bill WON’T be for $787 billion; it will be for $3.27TRILLION.

Stimulus Verdict: A $3.27 Trillion Porker

By: David A. Patten     February 14, 2009

The gargantuan stimulus bill Congress has rubber-stamped with virtually no Republican support contains tens of billions of the very spending projects that made the legislation a lightning rod for criticism.

And although the bill is generally described as costing $787 billion, the Congressional Budget Office reports the actual figure is now closer to $3.27 trillion.

That stems from the $744 billion it will take to pay for the additional debt the legislation will create, and $2.527 trillion in increased spending from the new and expanded programs the bill will spawn over the next decade.

The bill now spans more than 1,000 pages. While Democrats removed some provisions that fiscal conservatives objected to, most of the pork remains. Among them:

  • The plan has more than $3 billion in “neighborhood stabilization” and Community Development Block Grant funding, much of which may go to benefit ACORN, a low-income housing and voter registration “community” organization that is under federal investigation for its suspicious voter registration practices.
  • $1.3 billion to bailout AMTRAK, the perennial money-loser railroad.
  • $1 billion for educational programs, including courses on sexually transmitted diseases.
  • $30 million for restoration of wetlands to be spent in the San Francisco Bay Area – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s district. The money will go in part to protect the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse.
  • $200 million for a low-pollution, coal-fired power plant in President Barack Obama’s home state of Illinois.
  • $45 million for ATV four-wheeler trails, and government office renovations, according to RNC Chairman Michael Steele.
  • $200 million to provide computers to community colleges.
  • $50 million for the National Endowment of the Arts.
  • Over $650 million in coupons to help consumers buy digital TV converter-box coupons.
  • A reported $300 million for hybrid vehicles and electric-powered cars. According to the Washington Times, this item will include buying golf carts for federal workers.GOP Sen. John McCain summed up his view of the bill: “This measure is not bipartisan. It contains much that is not stimulative.”Some of the criticisms of the bill, however, center on policy rather than cost.The Heritage Foundation, for example, reports the bill reverses the bipartisan welfare reforms achieved during the Clinton administration.Also, opponents have slammed the bill for being “anti-religious,” because it expressly prohibits the use of stimulus funds for faith-based schools, schools of divinity, facilities used for “sectarian worship,” or places of religious worship.
  • Heritage Foundation has an image of the CBO’s scoring:

    So while the media continues to report “$787 billion stimulus” to mask the actual devastating cost of this mess, in point of fact we’re not talking about a colossal $787 billion boondoggle; we’re talking about a mega-colossal $3.27 trillion boondoggle.

    There are a whole lot of questions about whether Obama is creating any jobs with his massive government spending (beyond his fairy tale “saved” jobs that the US Bureau of Labor Statistics has said can’t be verifiedand can you even imagine the mainstream media allowing President George Bush to hype job numbers that he couldn’t verify???), but there is no question at all that the trillions of dollars being spent are all-too-real. And there is no question that a great big giant lead anvil will fall on the US economy due to the near doubling of the national debt as Obama adds a projected $9.3 trillion to the $11.7 trillion hole we’re already in (which doesn’t count the tens of trillions of dollars in unfunded mandates from Social Security, Medicare, etc).  Obama is borrowing 50 cents on the dollar as he explodes the federal deficit by spending four times more than Bush spent in 2008 and in the process “adding more to the debt than all presidents — from George Washington to George Bush — combined.” And most terrifying of all, Obama’s spending will cause debt to double from 41% of GDP in 2008 to a crushing 82% of GDP in 2019.

    What will be the result of all this insane spending, and not very far off? A quote from a CNS News story should awaken anyone who thinks the future will be rosy:

    By 2019, the CBO said, a whopping 82 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) will go to pay down the national debt. This means that in future years, the government could owe its creditors more than the goods and services that the entire economy can produce.

    Now you have to add to that the fact that the Democrats are pushing a $3.5 TRILLION health care bill that will socialize – on top of a big chunk of the economy that already HAS been socialized (e.g. banks, auto companies) a further 1/6th of the US economy.

    And you have to add in the staggering future costs to our economy that will be imposed by the Waxman-Markey (or as I prefer to call it, the Wackjob-Marxist) cap-and-trade bill that will result in capping productivity and trading away our prosperity: $6,800 per family of four by 2035, even as our energy costs skyrocket (or to quote Obama himself: Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket).  And as energy costs (and therefore production) increase dramatically, do you think employers will hire more workers, or fewer and fewer?

    All that staggering hyperinflation-creating debt-funded government spending, along with the simultaneous nationalization of our economy and the systemic undermining of our productivity, and about the only jobs that are being created are for washing cars and running errands for politically-connected Democrats.

    By the time the American people understand what has happened to their economy and to their way of life, it’s going to be too late to undo the damage that will have been done.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    7 Responses to “As Economy Continues Toward Toilet Bowl, Don’t Forget True Cost Of Failed Stimulus”

    1. hl Says:

      Hi Michael,
      “CAP our PRODUCTIVITY and TRADE our PROSPERITY!” What a great summation of this abomination of a bill!
      We watched C-Span on Friday evening as Rep. John Boehner R-OH, read through portions of the 300 page ammendment added to the humongous bill at 3 am that morning. What we heard was jaw dropping frightening.
      The shear amount of rules and regulations and taxes on industry is beyond belief.
      This administration is sucking the very life blood out of the producers in this country.
      To add insult to injury you have Obama, Pelosi, Waxman and others heralding this and those who voted for it as visionary heros, leading the way of the future. All the while accusing those who resisted as liars, fear-mongers and stuck in the ‘status quo.’
      Their fantasy, utopian ideology and their wicked, lying, deceiving rhetoric is infuraiting beyond words.

      Truly, the days are evil!

    2. Michael Eden Says:

      Cap and trade will kill us. That’s the nutshell.

      Countries like China and India won’t be capping their productivity and trading their prosperity, I can assure you. So while we send our energy prices through the roof, they will be expanding their economies to match our contraction.

      First of all, global warming is becoming more and more obviously a giant lie. More and more scientists are talking now about GLOBAL COOLING. And China and India – which are building several new coal plants EVERY WEEK, will continue to pollute at such a high rate that our undermining our own economy will have no effect whatsoever.

      I am more and more convinced that we are truly in the last days, and the Antichrist will soon be here. We are committing suicide at a rate that stuns even me (I say that as someone who looked into the ugliness of Jeremiah Wright, recognized the evil of a president who spent 23 years in such a toxic cesspool, and had a vision of the future if Obama was elected). But I have no fear, because the same God who warned us of the last days promised He would come for His people and take them out of the hell on earth man is about to create for himself.

    3. hl Says:

      The delusional insanity of a Liberal:

      “New York Times liberal columnist Paul Krugman accused those who voted against Waxman-Markey of committing “treason against the planet” and said global warming was a bigger threat to America than terrorism.”

    4. Michael Eden Says:

      I call it the Wackjob-Marxist bill, but that’s just me.

      Treason, huh?

      Some day we’ll be hunting Paul Krugman and other liberals who destroyed out country down with dogs. Krugman can live it up until then.

    5. insurance quotes Says:

      Nice content and very good knowledge – I have bookmarked your blog.

    6. Gene Sprenkle Says:

      Michael, the antichrist arrived on the scene nearly 2000 years ago. Study the first epistle of John in it’s entirety for proof.

    7. Michael Eden Says:

      You are coming from the preterist school of thought, and I won’t begrudge you.

      The book of 1 John uses the word “antichrist” five times. In John 2:22, we’re told the antichrist is the one who denies the Father and the Son. This is clearly the same sense that is intended in 1 John 2:18, which says, “even now many antichrists have arisen.” We’re also told in 1 John 4:3 that the one who denies the Son is from the Father is antichrist. Was such a person in the world? Of COURSE. Such a spirit has been around from the first moment that Christ began His public ministry. And you CAN’T say the antichrist came 2000 years ago in the sense John is using in his epistle, unless you say that there is no one today who denies Christ, or denies Christ comes from the Father. Come to my neighborhood; I can take you to the homes of several “antichrists” today using that sense.

      The Book of Revelation uses the word “beast,” rather than antichrist. Many Christians use the terms interchangeably – because the beast of Revelation is clearly a satanic “Christ-substitute” who will be personally indwelt by Satan whereas Christ was indwelt by the Holy Spirit. Revelation clearly refers to a future figure who does things that engulf the entire world. Nothing close to what is described in Revelation has ever happened, I would argue. It refers to a yet future person at a yet future time.

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

    Connecting to %s

    %d bloggers like this: