This is just beyond disturbing:
In a video made from 135 separate photographs taken at a United Nations function, Barack Obama had the same exact smile in every single one.
Here’s the video available via Donklephant.
In case you think this is just too bizarre to be real, you’re wrong. Here are the 135 pictures, available via an official White House flikr site. They were taken during a reception at the Metropolitan Museum in New York City, New York.
Either we elected an automaton owned, programmed, and operated by some George Soros-type billionaire, or else we elected the world’s phoniest human being.
And either option is really scary.
Tags: 135, consistent, fake, Metropolitan Museum, Obama, photos, pictures, reception, smile, UN, United Nations
September 29, 2009 at 9:21 am
I promise, I thought for sure his image was put into those…but it’s actually real…geez, un-freaking-believable!
September 29, 2009 at 10:17 am
well its doesnt matter i mean how is a smile supose to look u white close minded man!!!!
September 29, 2009 at 9:28 pm
It absolutely is.
I can’t even maintain the same smile in TWO pictures, let alone 135.
It’s like they put a mannequin there, or something.
September 29, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Oh, I didn’t mind his smile. It’s actually a nice smile. I just truly didn’t expect to see the same one 135 times.
October 9, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Oh please I have thousands of pictures with the same smile, the same face, it’s called posing u know, u know which angle is the best for you, and then u pose with the same face everytime, I admire him even more, Bush was fugly
October 9, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Diego, it would be even more believable if you said you had MILLIONS of pictures with the same exact smile.
Let me get this straight: you admire Obama more because he is capable of wearing a robot smile? Alas that we live in a world in which great smiles matter more than great ideas, great leadership, or great anything else.
October 10, 2009 at 8:03 am
Did you seriously waste my time with this crazy ass email?? Why don’t you use your time for good and towards humanity and not stupidity.
October 10, 2009 at 11:16 pm
As to your final sentence, I’m sure that you spend all your time feeding the hungry and clothing the poor. I should probably feel guilty because of the incredibly noble things you WOULD have done if you hadn’t taken the time to write your comment to me.
For the record, I have never emailed any article I’ve ever written to anyone. In fact, I’ve never emailed an article I’ve written for this site to family or friends, let alone losers like you. So I didn’t waste your time with anything. Rather, you’re wasting my time now by blathering comments to my blog.
But if someone is aggravating you by emailing you of any of my articles, I can only smile one of those poop-eating grin smiles.
October 18, 2009 at 9:13 pm
Obama is the world’s most fake human being but it isn’t because of his smile. Anyone paying attention for the last couple years should be able to easily tell what he is: A happy smiling face on the same old conservative b.s. Face it America: Face it America: Conservatives are all that you are allowed to vote for because conservatives (including those who pretend in most superficial fashion to be “centrist” which is the closest an American politician nowadays can come to being liberal without being declared an “enemy combatant” by Glenn Beck) are all that the wealthy ruling elite that actually makes the decisions in this country will back. Nobody who could remotely change America into something approaching a respectable country will get anything from the elite besides derision and ridicule.
See, here’s how it works: The high-rollers who have more money than they can spend in several lifetimes don’t start wringing their hands and getting ulcers every four years out of fear that the public might finally elect someone who will derail their gravy train. They don’t get their luggage all packed to move to the Bahamas or the Caymans every election cycle. Know why? Because they don’t have to. It’s far easier for them to fund all the major candidates from BOTH hardly-dissimilar political parties and let them fight it out. May the best man or woman win! Because they know that no matter who wins it will be guaranteed to be someone that won’t give them heartburn. Rigging elections is so third-world. The richest country on the planet doesn’t need to. Its bourgeoisie simply buys all the plastic marionette candidates that could have a shot at winning and thus controls all the choices available.
They have the best of both worlds: All the control and continuity of policy and predictability one could expect from an obvious dictatorship but with the thin veneer of respectability because the big money a-holes deign to let their subjects CHOOSE who will be the next puppet of the oligarchs, nevermind that it doesn’t matter a hill of beans who they choose since nothing will change anyway. And most of the American public is so damn simpleminded and cowed and easily led and downright gullible that they fall for it! Every. Single. Time.
October 19, 2009 at 4:51 am
Lev thinks that Barack Obama is a conservative. Which is another way of saying that Lev just isn’t very smart.
Conservatives believe in small government. Conservatives believe in a strict-constructionist view of the Constitution. Conservatives believe in adhering to a view of our Constitution and our government as the founding fathers intended.
If Barack Obama is a conservative, I am a resident of the planet Krypton, and have superhuman strength, X-ray vision, etc. etc., and I fly around rescuing Lois Lane.
For all of his craziness, Lev is right in one thing: the truly rich are truly fine regardless of the party in power. They can invest their money, or shelter their money. Either way, they’re still rich. Liberals always claim that they’ll going to “make the rich pay their fair share,” but the richest people never end up paying. Rather, it’s the small business owners who get hosed under the liberals’ Marxist class warfare games.
September 14, 2012 at 2:52 am
PANAM SMILE
September 14, 2012 at 11:45 am
I had to look that term up as I had not heard it before:
Pretty much nails it with the “Pan-Am” presidency of fakeness.