Obama Not A Happy Marxist Camper

It’s kind of pathetic, really.  The Slobbering Love Affair that the media has had with Obama still isn’t over; it’s just that Obama has been such an abject failure in every aspect of his failed presidency that even über minister of propaganda Joseph Goebbels couldn’t bail him out.  But Obama can’t seem to emotionally handle that ANY media outlet or ANY reporter is permitted to say anything negative about him (and I don’t seem to remember Obama decrying this phenomenon of negative news coverage when George Bush was president).  Obama has received the most fawning media coverage of any president in the modern era – and it STILL isn’t enough for him.

Obama is the guy who has routinely and shrilly demonized Fox News for reporting what has turned out to be the truth.  Obama is the guy who hasn’t had a press conferance for longer than any of his predecessors.  It’s now been nine months since Obama was accountable to the media.  And even liberal media such as the Los Angeles Times has pointed out that his self-righteous claims of “transparency” has been a bogus load of crap.

Obama is not happy about not being able to control the media. This is typical of a socialist….if he can’t control the message, then the message must be a lie. This thought process, this way of thinking, is very dangerous. To quote the President:

“Meanwhile, you’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t rank all that high on the truth meter. With iPods and iPads; Xboxes and PlayStations; information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment. All of this is not only putting new pressures on you; it is putting new pressures on our country and on our democracy.”

Flopping Aces put it this way:

Imagine if Bush had said this…

What [Obama’s] crying about is the fact that he and his cohorts haven’t been as successful as hoped in controlling the flow of information, and how we…his minions…should interpret that information. Very hard to lie when there are so many forms of media today. How else can he sell us crap like how well the economy is going, or a State actually enforcing laws is a bad thing, or Socializing medicine isn’t going to cost us more in the long run, both economically and in the quality of that service.

It was sooooo much better when all we had were the alphabet channels, the NYT’s, and Cronkite to control what the flow of information….right?

Now we know why Barack Obama selected Marxist Mark Lloyd to be his “Diversity Czar”; Obama believes the identical same communist garbage about controlling the media to control the people’s perception that Lloyd does.

From Obama’s handpicked Marxist:

Lloyd wrote in his 2006 book, Prologue to a Farce: Communication and Democracy in America, “It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press.  This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies. … “[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance.”

Freedom, screedom.  It’s overrated.  There’s no God.  We’re biologically determined meat puppets.  The “people” (i.e. the Marxist-fascist totalitarian big government) really ought to have complete control over the herd animals otherwise known as the human race.  Then we could have the kind of “democracy” that big government liberals want.

Lloyd also said of Marxist dictator Hugo Chavez:

“In Venezuela, with Chavez, is really an incredible revolution – a democratic revolution.  To begin to put in place things that are going to have an impact on the people of Venezuela.  The property owners and the folks who then controlled the media in Venezuela rebelled – worked, frankly, with folks here in the U.S. government – worked to oust him.  But he came back with another revolution, and then Chavez began to take very seriously the media in his country.”

If by “began to take very seriously the media” you mean “used the power of government to destroy free speech,” you’re right.

Sean Penn explained what the standard of media coverage should be from his liberal, progressive perspective:

“Every day, this elected leader is called a dictator here, and we just accept it, and accept it” said Penn, winner of two Best Actor Academy Awards. “And this is mainstream media, who should — truly, there should be a bar by which one goes to prison for these kinds of lies.”

Ah, just the kind of media standard that Hitler and Goebbels would have loved.

And, of course, many prominent Democrats have been trying to implement dictator Hugo Chavez’s policies via their “Fairness Doctrine” for years.  And when one version of this socialist takeover of the media fails to cut the mustard, there’s always the “new, improved” version.

Obama’s handpicked czars like Ron Bloom also hold radical Marxist positions such as:

Generally speaking, we get the joke. We know that the free market is nonsense.”

And:

We know this is largely about power, that it’s an adults only no limit game. We kind of agree with Mao that political power comes largely from the barrel of a gun.”

We know that Obama’s number one visitor – Andy Stern of SEIU – is a rabid Marxist:

– “Because workers of the world unite, it’s not just a slogan anymore.”

– “We like to say: We use the power of persuasion first. If it doesn’t work, we try the persuasion of power.”

We know that Obama demonstrated his radical Marxism via his appointment of self-described communist Van Jones:

  • I met all these young radical people of color — I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’”
  • How’s that capitalism working for ya?
  • And the white polluters and the white environmentalists are essentially steering poison into the people-of-color communities.
  • “This movement is deeper than a solar panel! Deeper than a solar panel! Don’t stop there! Don’t stop there! We’re gonna change the whole system! We’re gonna change the whole thing!

And we know that Obama’s White House CONTINUES to employ Marxist hostility and jack-booted-thug rhetoric about private companies, as demonstrated by Obama’s Interior Secretary Ken Salazar’s comment:

Salazar’s boots kept walking on CNN, where he said, “Our job is keep our boot on the neck of British Petroleum and make sure they live up to their responsibilities.”

The media has largely been like Pavlov’s dog, trained to drool every time Obama has called to them.  But even their fawning coverage hasn’t been enough for him.  He is a Marxist to his core.  And such people have always done everything they could to undermine freedom and liberty.

Read Liberal Fascism.  Realize that the first word is just a nice-sounding synonym that means the second word.  Look at who REALLY wants to control the press, control free speech, use the politics of demonization and demagoguery to divide the country, and impose the big government socialism of Marxist-fascism.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Obama Not A Happy Marxist Camper”

  1. Ross Wolf Says:

    Is Obama’s refusal to secure our Mexican Border from millions of invading Illegal Immigrants by design?

    This President vehemently refuses to secure the Mexican border despite America approaching bankruptcy, while millions of unemployed Americans are losing jobs to illegal aliens and while many states’ infrastructures are broke and can’t afford the burgeoning expense of illegal Immigrants’ medical, educational and incarceration costs warehousing illegal immigrants that commit crimes. Before addressing that question, one might ask, why Obama in the midst of the U.S. Financial Crisis wants to burden U.S. taxpayers making Puerto Rico a state, often referred as Welfare Island.

    Americans find it unbelievable Obama came out against Arizona’s immigration bill SB 1070 without reading the bill. But it is believable when you consider Obama has a Socialist/Marxist constituency that intends to absorb into their ranks millions of illegal immigrants via Amnesty to help Obama force his socialist ideology on America—socialism mandates U.S. Citizens’ share their wealth with the masses. Increasingly it appears Obama intends to force Socialism on Americans—even if that means destroying the U.S. economy in addition to abolition of the U.S. Constitution. It is problematic that if Obama can bring into the U.S., millions of indigents that a large number will vote for his socialist policies, bleeding U.S. Taxpayers dry, politically changing the direction of America toward Socialism. Recently the Obama administration took legal steps to stop an illegal Arizona immigration law taking affect that criminalizes employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants. Obviously Obama does not want to remove the main driving force that brings most illegal immigrants to America, jobs. And obviously Obama is numb to millions of Arizonans and other Americans out of work. America’s greatest threat is not from foreign enemies, but from Marxists and Socialists like Obama that slithered into U.S. Government. Despite America being in the worst recession since the Great Depression Obama’s has forced unaffordable health insurance, new taxes and regulatory costs on U.S. Citizens and businesses that will inhibit investment and hiring of new employees for years. If Comrade Obama succeeds in spending America into bankruptcy, it is foreseeable millions of disparate Americans might accept, even welcome a hybrid form of Marxist/socialism.

    Millions of Americans in every State should peacefully march in their State in protest against the Obama Government and ask Obama to Resign Now!

  2. Ross Wolf Says:

    Could Obama Be America’s First Defacto President?

    Innocent Americans increasingly are sent to prison based on false evidence manufactured by police forensic crime labs. Now President Obama wants the power to incarcerate U.S. Citizens not on evidence, but for what they might do.

    Compare: Two days after the 1933 burning of Germany’s Parliament Building, blamed on communists, Hitler responded with a powerful speech before Parliament. Hitler asked Parliament to suspend sections of the Reich Constitution that protected Citizens’ Rights and Civil Liberties. Hitler said the suspension was necessary so government could protect the homeland from being destroyed by communists. Hitler promised Parliament the Constitution would later be restored. After Parliament passed Hitler’s Discriminatory Decrees and Hitler signed it February 28, 1933, Hitler immediately used the news laws to abolished Parliament. See Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Laws below:

    Obama gave a speech in May 2010, that proposed incarcerating in indefinite prolonged detention without evidence, any person government deemed a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future; that would include U.S. Citizens “without evidence of wrongdoing.” With that amount power Obama like Hitler could arrest members of Congress, drag U.S. Citizens off the street and from their homes to be imprisoned indefinitely based only on Government’s claim they are a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future.

    If Congress approves Obama’s categories of people likely to engage in violent acts, overnight millions of lawful U.S. activists could be subject to arrest, Indefinite Prolonged Detention. When you examine Obama’s speech, it appears Obama wants retroactive power to incarcerate anyone government claims (prior) supported violent acts on the premise that person is likely to support violent acts in the future: U.S. activists would be extremely vulnerable because no activist can control what another activist or group might do illegally they network with domestically or overseas. Government would only have to allege a person; group or organization might commit a violent act in the future to order Preventative Detention of lawful participants with no evidence whatsoever. Americans would be afraid to speak out. See: Obama Sound-Video http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/630.html

    It is foreseeable any “individual” who writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against or entity of U.S. Government or its coalition partners could be deemed by authorities a “Combatant” or likely to engage in or cause violent acts: government too easily could claim an author’s writings inspired people in the past and will in the future to commit or support violent acts. It is problematic that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or allowed legal counsel; interrogated, will be prosecuted for ordinary crimes because of their alleged admissions while held in indefinite “Prolonged Detention. Obama wants the power to override the U.S. Constitution. Obama wants the power to detain indefinitely any American without probable cause or evidence, based on conjecture someone might do something violent in the future.

    Obama similar to Hitler is centralizing power in the federal Government by getting passed legislation the U.S. government could potentially use to intimidate and threaten corporations among others. Hitler got passed similar laws shortly before the burning of the German Parliament building blamed on the communists. Immediately after the fire, Hitler used his new laws to coerce corporations and influential Citizens to support passage of fascist legislation that suspended provisions of the German Constitution that protected Citizens’ freedoms and civil liberties. Obama is now approaching a position where he can use similar new laws, including the Patriot Act and 200 asset forfeiture laws to seize any corporation or individual’s assets; and force U.S. corporations and other institutions like Hitler did to support legislation that threatens or curtails rights of Americans.

    More recently Obama has moved forward to crush Free Speech, silence his critics by pushing passage of HR 5175: this abomination will choke the 1st Amendment, denying the right of free speech to ordinary Americans. Under Title II: groups like Gun Owners of America and other groups including bloggers that only mention “public officials” within 60 days of an election, could be required to file onerous disclosures–and potentially have to disclose their membership lists—despite the Supreme Court ruling in NAACP v. Alabama that held membership lists like those of GOA’s) are off limits to government control. Is Obama’s support of HR 5175 similar to what Hitler did to shut up his critics? In the run up to Parliament passing his police state laws including the 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that abolished Citizen’s Free Speech, Hitler employed thugs to beat up reporters, arrest anyone who had courage to criticize the Fuhrer or his Nazi government or expose introduced legislation. Is Obama by supporting HR 5175 to shut up his critics, trying to take American to the same place?

    Alarmingly the Obama Government recently employed a vendor to search Internet social networking sites to collect information about Americans that could potentially be used by this government to injure Americans, for example, if you apply for a federal job, your name might be crossed referenced by the Obama Government with comments you made at Websites against Obama; or if you make application at a bank for a loan the Government has control since the financial crisis, could your Internet comment(s) prevent you getting that loan? Obama’s monitoring of the Internet sites can too easily be used by Government to intimidate Citizens from speaking out. Obama Top CZAR Cass Sunstein prepared a 2008 paper that proposed spying on Americans, infiltrating groups and organizations to obstruct Free Speech, disrupt the exchange of ideas and disseminate false information to neutralize Americans that might question government.
    See: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=121884

    To hear Obama proposing Indefinite Detention without evidence, you access sound-video-sound at following web addresses:
    http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/630.html

    See Hitler’s 1933 Nazi Laws below:

    DECREE OF THE REICH PRESIDENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE AND STATE

    Note: Based on translations by State Department, National Socialism, 1942 PP. 215-17, and Pollak, J.K., and Heneman, H.J., The Hitler Decrees, (1934), pp. 10-11.7

    In virtue of Section 48 (2) of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against Communist acts of Violence, endangering the state:

    Section 1
    Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.

    Section 2
    If in a state the measures necessary for the restoration of public security and order are not taken, the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the highest state authority.

    Section 4
    Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.

    Whoever endangers human life by violating Section 1, is to be punished by sentence to a penitentiary, under mitigating circumstances with imprisonment of not less than six months and, when violation causes the death of a person, with death, under mitigating circumstances with a penitentiary sentence of not less that two years. In addition the sentence my include confiscation of property.

    Whoever provokes an inciter to or act contrary to public welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.

    Section 5
    The crimes which under the Criminal Code are punishable with penitentiary for life are to be punished with death: i.e., in Sections 81 (high treason), 229 (poisoning), 306 (arson), 311 (explosion), 312 (floods), 315, paragraph 2 (damage to railroad properties, 324 (general poisoning).

    Insofar as a more severe punishment has not been previously provided for, the following are punishable with death or with life imprisonment or with imprisonment not to exceed 15 years:

    1. Anyone who undertakes to kill the Reich President or a member or a commissioner of the Reich Government or of a state government, or provokes to such a killing, or agrees to commit it, or accepts such an offer, or conspires with another for such a murder;

    2. Anyone who under Section 115 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious rioting) or of Section 125 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious disturbance of the peace) commits the act with arms or cooperates consciously and intentionally with an armed person;

    3. Anyone who commits a kidnapping under Section 239 of the Criminal with the intention of making use of the kidnapped person as a hostage in the political struggle.

    Section 6
    This decree enters in force on the day of its promulgation.

    Reich President
    Reich Chancellor
    Reich Minister of the Interior

  3. Michael Eden Says:

    We’ve had two periods in which citizens were incarcerated in a racist, paranoid, and flagrently illegal manner. During World War I, under the presidency of “the father of the progressive movement,” Democrat Woodrow Wilson. And during World War II, under the presidency of Democrat FDR, who was as fascist as Benito Mussolini ever was.

    Why shouldn’t we expect progressives and Democrats to do again what they’ve already done twice before?

    Liberals call conservatives all kinds of pejoratives about how “fascist” we are, but again and again, they’ve been the ones who’ve done the actual fascist acts.

    In addition to what Obama has proposed as president, he has also nominated Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. And this woman has supported detaining indefinitely people whom are merely suspected of terrorism. And anywhere in the world, too.

    Bottom line is that liberals talk and talk about how wonderful they are in protecting our civil liberties. But they would be putting people in camps for political “crimes” if they had the power to do so.

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    I’ve got two words: Cloward and Piven.

    Politico Article Reveals Obama’s Cloward-Piven Strategy Backfiring

    Obama’s Cloward-Piven Redistributionism Shaping The Future Collapse

    ObamaCare Is Cloward-Piven Strategy In Microcosm

    Cloward-Piven Alive And Well: Progressives CONTINUE To Push For Destruction Of U.S. System

  5. Your Fat Mother Says:

    Its just amazing to me how right-wing tea baggers get so upset about the same tactics their politicians utilize when they are in power (lying, war) when its a democrat that does it. Obama is a mild democrat and nothing compared to real Marxism…sadly. I must say he is still much better than little Bush. Have a great [expletive deleted] day!

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    I deleted an F-bomb from this creep – next one I just block him.

    I notice 1) he names himself something that will be as vile and insulting as he could think of. Because vile and insulting define his very existence. 2) He readily identifies himself as a rabid Marxist – and tells us that Obama is not up to his standards of Marxism. 3) He has no actual negative things to say about Republicans, and so merely alludes to ad hominem rhetoric in place of actual facts. 4) However, in so doing, he tacitly acknowledges that Democrats are guilty of lying and stupid war-fighting, but that he’s too much of an ideologue to care if the left is guilty. 5) He somehow managed to miss out on “Bush derangement syndrome” and now says that we somehow just started the thing they’ve been doing for years.

    One of the things stupid people don’t realize is that a Marxist president can’t just walk in on day one and have the 20th year of the Stalin regime the next day. It is – shall I use the word? – “progressive.” A Marxist-fascist comes into the picture and just keeps pushing as hard and as fast as he thinks he can possibly get away with.

    Ezra Taft Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture during all 8 years of the Eisenhower administration, quoted a conversation he had with USSR leader Khrushchev:

    “as we talked face to face, he indicated that my grandchildren would live under communism. After assuring him that I expected to do all in my power to assure that his and all other grandchildren would live under freedom.”

    He arrogantly declared in substance, “You Americans are so gullible, no you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you finally wake up and find that you already have communism.”

    “We won’t have to fight you, we’ll so weaken your economy, until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands!”

    Do you get it? Not 100% communism overnight, but a steady, constant, forceful trend in the direction of communism until we’re finally “there.”

    So let’s say a Marxist came into the White House, oh, say, in 2009. What would he do?

    Well, he would probably first put us massively in debt, and massively increase the size and power of government in the process. So I suppose he’d enact some kind of “stimulus” package that put us in debt by, oh, say, some staggering sum like $3.27 TRILLION.

    Then he’d probably socialize our health care system. That’s certainly what Ronald Reagan believed a Marxist would do:

    There are many ways in which our government has invaded the precincts of private citizens, the method of earning a living. But at the moment I’d like to talk about another way because this trip is with us and at the moment is more imminent.

    One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. Most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can’t afford it.

    Now, the American people, if you put it to them about socialized medicine and gave them a chance to choose, would unhesitatingly vote against it. We had an example of this. Under the Truman administration it was proposed that we have a compulsory health insurance program for all people in the United States, and, of course, the American people unhesitatingly rejected this.

    And, of course, in the socialized health care plan, the lying demagogues would say one thing, but do another. And millions of Americans would get dumped into a socialized plan that they never would have agreed to unless statist socialist had taken real choice away from them.

    Then, being a fascist at heart, if he had a Marxist in office, he would demagogue some disaster and try to socialize the energy system too. Then he would have control of the two largest and most powerful forces in our entire culture – health and energy.

    Of course, he’d do the same thing to other important issues, such as holding border security hostage to a Marxist “workers-of-the-world-unite” attempt to get rid of our sovereign borders and create a perennial leftist political base.

    Then he could really start going, because he would literally have the power of life and death, prosperity and poverty, over the people that such a Marxist rat bastard has always wanted over the people.

    I know, I know. It doesn’t sound the least bit familiar to what Obama’s doing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: