Obama Guilty Of Crimes Against Humanity

The left called George Bush a war criminal, a man who was guilty of crimes against humanity.

Pretty much every day of his presidency.

Of course, Barry Hussein is at war in absolutely every country that George Bush fought in.  But that’s different.  Because liberals are hypocrites and don’t really give much of a damn about facts.

So they were beyond frothing-at-the-mouth outrage at every opportunity when the President was a Republican.

Analysis: Press Largely Ignored Incendiary Rhetoric at Bush Protest
By Bill Sammon
Published August 12, 2009

News outlets that are focusing on the incendiary rhetoric of conservatives outside President Obama’s town hall meeting Tuesday ignored the incendiary rhetoric — and even violence — of liberals outside an appearance by former President George W. Bush in 2002.

When Bush visited Portland, Ore., for a fundraiser, protesters stalked his motorcade, assailed his limousine and stoned a car containing his advisers. Chanting “Bush is a terrorist!”, the demonstrators bullied passers-by, including gay softball players and a wheelchair-bound grandfather with multiple sclerosis.

One protester even brandished a sign that seemed to advocate Bush’s assassination. The man held a large photo of Bush that had been doctored to show a gun barrel pressed against his temple.

“BUSH: WANTED, DEAD OR ALIVE,” read the placard, which had an X over the word “ALIVE.”

Another poster showed Bush’s face with the words: “F— YOU, MOTHERF—ER!”

And exactly HOW MANY screaming-in-your-face protests have the left thrown at Zero?  Obama, that’s how many.  Or maybe it’s the other way around.

The mainstream media treated Cindy Sheehan like the incontrovertible voice of truth when Bush was president; now they just treat her like a demented shrew with Obama putting his feet up on the Oval Office desk.

Let us remember, and never ever forget:

So Bush was evil for fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq.  And Obama is only a little bit guilty for completely lying about getting us out, and not a bloodthirsty warmonger at all.  Even though Bush got us into a war that we could win, whereas Obama said Bush’s war that we could win was evil, and we needed to put all our eggs in Vietnam I mean Afghanistan instead.

Barack Obama is a month away from equaling the total number of American casualties that George Bush lost in his entire eight years of war in Afghanistan.  Obama is every bit as much of a warmonger as George Bush ever was.

But that’s only part of Obama’s crimes against humanity.

Barack Obama is also guilty of crimes against human beings being able to have a job.

Want an example?  Here you go:

SHOCK! Offshore Drilling Moratorium Would Cost United States 175,000 Jobs Per Year Through 2035
by Bob McCarty

During a 45-minute conference call with journalists from 40 major media outlets this morning, Jack Gerard shared some startling predictions about the future health of the nation’s oil and natural gas industry if the Obama Administration gets its way in adding more regulation and increasing taxes on offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. The biggest one of all is enough to cause anyone to take pause:

“The administration’s moratorium, if continued indefinitely — or similar legislative proposals which would make the deep water unavailable or uneconomic — would cost this country 175,000 jobs every year between now and 2035, according to our latest analysis,” said Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute, a group representing some 400 oil and natural gas companies.

And that’s not all!

“The Gulf of Mexico accounts for 30 percent of our domestic oil production and 13 percent of natural gas,” Gerard explained. “The deepwater areas account for 80 percent of the Gulf’s oil production and 45 percent of its natural gas production. Twenty of the highest-producing leases are in the deep water.”

When one considers that the oil and natural gas industry, according to Gerard, supports 9.2 million workers and 7.5 percent of all U.S. gross domestic product, even a small percent of decline can have a tremendous impact on the economy.

According to an API-produced report released today, the economic impact of a complete shutdown of deepwater drilling would yield some awful results. For instance:

  • Reduce direct and indirect employment in the oil & gas and its service industries by 93,000 jobs – every year through 2035;
  • Reduce an additional 82,000 jobs every year through 2035 in non oil & gas related industries due to less income in the economy;
  • Reduce annual GDP by over $20 billion per year or a cumulative impact of approximately $500 billion in the next 25 years;
  • Reduce long-term U.S. oil production by 27 percent; and
  • Increase long-term U.S. foreign oil imports by 19 percent.

And so we can add “crimes against employment” to “crimes against humanity.”

We need to grasp reality: Obama’s job killing policies kill jobs.  And the only thing Obama is stimulating is unemployment.

Let’s face facts: business leaders – you know, the people who actually know something about business – are out in force saying that Obama policies are ‘job-destroying.’

The Wall Street Journal views Obama’s policies as a manifesto for job destruction.

Barack Obama is destroying jobs.

By the Democrats’ own standards from their 2004 campaign rhetoric against George Bush, Barack Obama is the worst president in American history.

And the right to work is a basic human right, according to Franklin Delano Roosevelt:

“The inherent right to work is one of the elemental privileges of a free people. Continued failure to achieve that right and privilege by anyone who wants to work and needs work is a challenge to our civilization and to our security.”

I submit, therefore, that Barack Obama is guilty of crimes against humanity – and by the very standards that Democrats created.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “Obama Guilty Of Crimes Against Humanity”

  1. HL Says:

    I could not agree more!

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    Obama is a man who will need to leave the country to save his own skin. Because one day – most likely when he’s out of office (i.e. after 2012 – the American people will finally come to realize the extent of his ruination of this country.

  3. HL Says:

    I hope your prophetic insight comes to pass. Prior to the final Judgment I hope this CRIMINAL faces accountability for his heinous crimes against us.

    Thanks for your continued documentation of the truth of what we are living through.

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    I’m not sure we want it to come to pass, given what will happen as a result.

    The terrorist Weathermen wrote:

    Defeating imperialism within the US couldn’t possibly have the content, which it could in a semi-feudal country, of replacing imperialism with capitalism or new democracy; when imperialism is defeated in the US, it will be replaced by socialism—nothing else. One revolution, one replacement process, one seizure of state power—the anti-imperialist revolution and the socialist revolution, one and the same stage.

    “Imperialism” being defined as the system of government our founding fathers bequeathed us, versus the Marxism the Weathermen wanted.

    Then you have the Cloward-Piven strategy to literally deliberately create the downfall of America in order to obtain the cherished goal of a socialist system.

    Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation

    I literally see Obama’s policies bringing the entire system crashing down. Followed by desperate people seeking help from a government which will have to grow giant in order to provide it.

    And then Antichrist, here we come.

  5. Diarmaid Ó Cadhla Says:

    George Bush has moved toward open promotion of fascism, he should be arrested!


  6. Michael Eden Says:

    First of all, you don’t have the slightest idea of what fascism actually, do you?

    From The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics:

    As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

    Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.

    In other words, to whatever extent George Bush was a “fascist,” you stupid liberals are a thousand times more fascist.

    You’re also a thousand times more hypocritical. For instance, Obama self-righteously denounced water-boarding, but actually increased the practice of “rendition,” in which he sent suspects to foreign countries for interrogation knowing full well that they would be tortured.

    So really, it’s people who like Obama who should be arrested, Diarmaid.

  7. Diarmaid Ó Cadhla Says:

    >> First of all, you don’t have the slightest idea of what fascism actually, do you?

    I know very well what fascism is, its a bit arrogant of you to presume otherwise. You are also wrong to label me as either “stupid” or a “liberal”, I regard myself as neither – why not just deal with the content of what I said rather than name calling?

    The statement I contributed to this blog was topical with the release of Mr. Bush’s book and his openly declared support for what has been described as torture by the current US administration. My contention is that therefore he should be arrested, torture is a crime under US and international law, is it not?

    In regards to Obama I agree he is also a war criminal.

    Your quoted description of socialism/fascism/totalitarianism/liberalism is something I don’t agree with – I don’t think the writer appreciates the role of history or the development of human society, however, this is not a discussion I wanted to raise.

    I simply wanted to highlight that to advocate torture and to admit to having organised it is a serious CRIME.

    I don’t know where you are from, I am Irish – but I suggest that Americans need to take stock of their democracy, which doesn’t appear very democratic to me. In the US, I think, both the ‘Republicans’ and ‘Democrats’ basically promote the same policies, the rule of monopolies and imperialism on a world scale. This is something which has cost the world, and Americans, hugely and it needs to change.

  8. Michael Eden Says:


    You clearly have no understanding of fascism whatsoever. Because you continue to make “torture” the single defining element of fascism when that is clearly not much of an element of “fascism” at all.

    You then proceed to reject a definition of fascism because you have no comprehension of what fascism is.

    Furthermore, it continues to be a stretch to define waterboarding as “torture.” Many of our own American soldiers and pilots have underwent waterboarding as part of their training to resist interrogation.

    The terrorists are NOT in ANY WAY under the Geneva Convention or any of its protections. They are not uniformed soldiers; they are not operating under a recognized nation-state; they are not following the orders of a legitimate chain of command.

    It is amazing that your outrage is directed against George Bush, and not against the people who murdered 3,000 innocent Americans. How someone like you can tolerate the mass murderers of innocents and seek to punish the people who fight those murderers is way beyond me.

    Given your last paragraph, you are right in saying I was wrong to label you a “liberal.” You are clearly WELL TO THE RADICAL LEFT of a mere “liberal.”

    As to whether you are “stupid,” I would let others judge that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: