Documented Fact: Obama, Democrats LIED About Reducing Health Care Costs

I pointed out back in March that health care premiums were on the increase and said, “Blame Obama and Democrats!”

Obama and Democrats lied in the most cynical and corrupt way.  They assured America that they could cover some 30 million more people and yet make health care cheaper.

Key components of ObamaCare are going into effect.  And yes, Average Joe American, YOU are going to pay for Obama’s compassion (because HE certainly won’t!).  Insurance companies are now being forced to accept children regardless of prior-existing conditions, raising their costs dramatically.  And “children” up to 26 years of age must now be accepted under parents’ plans.  As health insurers are forced to accept more and more risks that will hit their bottom lines, they are passing those costs on to everyone.

As anybody but a fool should have readily understood.

And you’d do the same thing if you were a business owner with a functioning brain cell in your skull.

Bill O’Reilly put it this way:

Obamacare begins to affect your wallet

“A couple of days ago I received my new health care premium and Oxford Health is charging me $2,100 more than it did last year. Almost every health insurer is raising premiums to cover the anticipated cost of Obamacare because the rules have changed. For example, this year health companies will have to cover adult children until the age of 26, they will have to cover all children regardless of pre-existing conditions, and they cannot cancel coverage for any reason other than fraud. So all that cost is being passed to us. And there’s more: The cost of Obamacare will be borne by the taxpayer as the government gives ‘free’ health insurance to those who don’t have much money. So we get hit two ways. President Obama does not seem to understand the unintended consequences of higher costs on businesses and productive workers. Talking Points believes we are headed to a bad place if the Democrats continue this big government spending craziness and taxpayer-supported entitlements. I can afford the 2-thousand bucks more I have to pay for my health insurance; many Americans can’t.”

Watch your premiums begin to skyrocket.  Watch employers dump your plans.  Watch Obama’s and the Democrat Party’s lies become increasingly awful.

Health Care Premiums Are Already Soaring In Advance of Obamacare
By Bradley Blakeman
Published August 16, 2010

This past month millions of Americans got notice from Blue Cross/Blue Shield providers across the country that their insurance premiums were going way up effective immediately. Here is the terse reason CareFirst/ Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Washington gave its subscribers for raising a monthly premium from $333 to $512 on a middle aged man who is healthy, is not a smoker and is not obese: “Your new rate reflects the overall rise in health care costs and we regret having to pass these additional costs on to you.”

Recently, Fox News anchor Bill O’Reilly also received a similar notice from his health care provider, (Anthem Blue Cross), and was told that his annual premium will increase by $2,100.

The excuse given was the same boilerplate as set forth above.

An 85-year-old New Yorker received notice from his health care provider, (Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield), wherein he was notified that:

1. His Medicare deductible is being increased from $1,068 to $1,100;

2. His co-insurance liability for skilled nursing facilities is being increased from $267 per day to $275 per day and that 60 lifetime reserve days is being increased from $534 to $550;

3. His Medicare Part B deductible is being increased from $135 to $155.

American health care providers are gouging consumers in advance of Obamacare taking effect in 2014.

According to publicly available profit and loss statements, our nation’s largest health care providers such as  Humana, Wellpoint, United Health Group, Cigna and Aetna collectively posted a net income of over 12 billion dollars in 2009.

Is it not just a little bit suspicious and beyond coincidence that so many Americans are receiving these letters from separate “independent” health care providers all over the country? The letters are almost identical in content and verbiage.

According to the Consumers Union report, not-for-profit Blue Cross/Blue Shield groups are raising health insurance premiums by as much as double digits to build up their cash reserves — in some instances to more than three times what states require.

It is no secret that these companies generate substantial investment income from reserves.

Here are just a few of the worst examples cited by Consumers Union:

– Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona raised its reserves from $648 million in 2007 to $717 million in 2009  (more than seven times the amount required in that state). During that time, individual policy rates jumped about 40 percent.

– Health Care Services Corp., which includes Blues plans in Texas, Illinois, New Mexico and Oklahoma, built up its surplus from $6.1 billion in 2007 to $6.7 billion in 2009, five times the minimum in those states.  Meanwhile, its plans’ rates rose by up to 20 percent a year.

So which is it? Are the companies raising rates to build reserves or are they raising rates in advance of rising costs they are anticipating by Obamacare, or are they raising rates because of an actual rise in the delivery of actual medical costs? You cannot get a straight answer.

If, in fact, health care providers are sitting on piles on cash that is far in excess of what it should be under state laws, why are they not rebating those surpluses to policyholders, as many automobile insurance companies do?

Another example of how Obamacare has influenced the behavior of health care providers is that under the new federal law it mandates that no more that 20 percent of every premium dollar be attributable to administrative costs. Therefore many companies who currently run 26 percent of administrative costs for every dollar have now “reclassified” many administrative services as “medical” so they do not lose income and can avoid reducing overhead.

In April of this year, the U.S. Senate reported that Wellpoint alone reclassified more than half a billion dollars in services from “administrative” to “medical.”

The bottom line is that in advance of Obamacare the consumer is getting taken advantage of with any recourse.

Looming over their heads is a law that does not even take effect until 2014. In the meantime We the People are stuck between greedy insurance companies and incompetent government
.

Now is the time to repeal and replace Obamacare. The answer to health care reforms does not lie in creating a government system; it lies in improving a free market system. Here are some of the reforms that should be done:

1. Creation of refundable credits for health care costs;

2. Strengthening health savings accounts;

3. Repeal of the 7/5% threshold on deduction for medical expenses;

4. Allow for purchase of health care insurance across state lines;

and 5. Facilitate the import on FDA approved drugs.

At a time of deep recession, high unemployment, record home foreclosures and personal and business bankruptcies, the last thing we need is further economic uncertainty looming with regard to nationalized health care.

America, let’s not accept commercial gouging or government incompetence and bureaucracy. Let’s fix what needs fixing!

Bradley A. Blakeman served as deputy assistant to President George W. Bush from 2001-04. He is currently a professor of Politics and Public Policy at Georgetown University and a frequent contributor to the Fox Forum

Every single one of these companies are raising their rates dramatically at the same time as incredibly costly ObamaCare provisions begin to take effect.  It isn’t a coincidence.

And because of such expensive provisions, some insurers are no longer offering policies covering children.

ObamaCare is a catastrophe.  It is “the sum of all fears.”  And, as Bradley Blakeman points out, it couldn’t have attacked the economy at a worse time.

ObamaCare was NEVER about health care; it was ALWAYS about imposing more control over the people.

Those who didn’t vote for Obama and Democrats ought to be able to take their premiums to their Democrat neighbors and force them to pay for the massive increases that they voted for.

It is long past time that Democrats should be allowed to get away with voting to be generous with other peoples’ money.

When Soylent Green time comes, eat all the Democrats first.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Documented Fact: Obama, Democrats LIED About Reducing Health Care Costs”

  1. Geoffrey Britain Says:

    “According to publicly available profit and loss statements, our nation’s largest health care providers such as Humana, Wellpoint, United Health Group, Cigna and Aetna collectively posted a net income of over 12 billion dollars in 2009.”

    I’m sure that’s true. Isn’t it also true that the profit margin for the health insurance industry is only 3.4%? Does anyone want to argue that to be too much? Puts a bit of a different spin on those 12 billion in profits doesn’t it?

    Incidentally those reserves, necessary to pay out claims are invested in the economy and in order to attract investment dollars, the insurance company must offer the prospective investor something in return for using the investors $$…otherwise known as a profit.

    “So which is it? Are the companies raising rates to build reserves or are they raising rates in advance of rising costs they are anticipating by Obamacare, or are they raising rates because of an actual rise in the delivery of actual medical costs? You cannot get a straight answer.”

    It’s ALL of the above and this ‘choice’ is dishonestly or incompetently framed, which given the ease with which the subject is understood is intellectually unforgivable.

    Rates are raising because in order to meet the certainty of increased costs ( “Insurance companies are now being forced to accept children regardless of prior-existing conditions, raising their costs dramatically. And “children” up to 26 years of age must now be accepted under parents’ plans. As health insurers are forced to accept more and more risks that will hit their bottom lines”) reserves must be increased to meet the coming greatly increased claims that these insurers will now be forced to pay (otherwise they go bankrupt and then your insurance can’t pay for any care).

    It’s econ 101 and anyone who rails at the greedy insurance companies (3.4% profit margin) either reveals their utter economic ignorance or betrays their intellectual dishonesty in service of a socialist agenda.

    Want to end capitalistic excess? Fine, say goodbye to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness because the economic engine that fuels the individual pursuit of happiness is capitalism. Restrict the pursuit of individual happiness and you place everyone but the elite in the same boat, the “equality of misery” where everyone is poor because you’ve eliminated the engine of economic growth; privately held pools of investment wealth. Just look to Europe who are just about at the end of the socialist road; running out of other peoples money.

    You can’t have it both ways, end capitalism’s ‘winners and losers’ (the poor you shall always have with you) and you get the ‘social justice’ of tribal struggle (we all belong to one special interest group or another) and/or the tyranny of the nanny state, otherwise known as 1984.

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    That was just a super summation, Geoffrey Britain. Agree with every word. Thank you for sharing it.

    Capitalism was the product of Christianity, which recognized that human beings are depraved, and which then strives to turn individual self-interest into the best possible benefit for society. Say I’m a business owner. Now, it might be my desire to gouge you, but I am in competition with other business owners to sell my products, and if I gouge my customers, they will take their business to my competitor(s). So it actually turns out to be in my interest to sell good products at fair prices. And competition thus insures the best benefit for society.

    Now, the funny thing is that the left – which believes so ardently in evolution – proceeds to show that they actually don’t even understand evolution. Because evolution is about competition, and competition producing the most fittest organisms. It turns out that they embrace evolution merely because they hate God and hate God’s morality; because they certainly don’t favor the idea of competition in business and in economics.

    If government got the hell out of the way, insurance companies would be able to cross state lines and compete with one another, and would be able to offer product lines that produced the best benefits to their customers for the lowest prices. But no. The left won’t have that competition; they want a centrally-planned society which doesn’t work, and which drives up the cost of everything.

    Not only do they take away the incentive of insurance companies to lower their prices, but they actually perversely encourage them to RAISE their prices. All the regulations prevent insurance companies from actually having to compete with one another, just as they discourage other businesses from getting involved in the market.

    So the left which has imposed ALL KINDS of government control over the health industry then proceed to argue that the private market – which they have prevented from operating – have failed, and we need the very government bureaucracy that has totally failed to dictate even more.

  3. david michel Says:

    people are stupid

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: