PC Police Unable To Determine If ‘Beat Whitey Night’ Attacks Racially Motivated, And The Growing Unrest

There comes a point when one is so “tolerant” that one’s brains spill out of one’s head and splatter all over the floor.

As a nation, we reached that point in the 1990s.  Out-of-control and frankly demonic political correctness was one of the fringe benefits of the Clinton years.

John Wayne may have put it best to describe our current situation when he said, “Life’s tough. It’s even tougher if you’re stupid.”

And, oh my Lord, are we ever getting dumber and dumber:

‘Beat Whitey Night’: Racism suspected in Iowa State Fair attacks
From The Des Moines Register

Des Moines, IA — Des Moines police are trying to determine what led to a series of attacks outside the Iowa State Fairgrounds over the weekend that included the assault of two police officers.

At least three people were arrested Friday through early Monday morning. Other arrests may occur as officers investigate the incidents, officials said.

There are indications that some of the fights – which appear to involve mostly teenagers and young adults – were racially motivated, police said.

“We don’t know if this was juveniles fighting or a group of kids singling out white citizens leaving the fairgrounds,” Sgt. Lori Lavorato said. “It’s all under investigation, but it’s very possible it has racial overtones.”

Officials announced last week that they were stepping up security outside the fairgrounds after a series of attacks Aug. 14 that included a pair of stabbings. Investigators are still investigating those assaults and victims intend to pursue charges.

Sgt. David Murillo stated in a report on Friday night, “On-duty officers at the fairgrounds advise there was a group of 30 to 40 individuals roaming the fairgrounds openly calling it ‘beat whitey night.’ “

Jammie Carroll, 36, of Polk City, was seriously injured in the 3000 block of East Grand Avenue Friday night after a group of people beat him up, causing severe injuries to his eyes, cheekbones and nose, Murillo wrote. Carroll is white, and many of the suspects are black, police said.

State Rep. Ako Abdul-Samad, D-Des Moines, who has worked to fight gang-related violence, said he doesn’t have enough information to decide if the fights were racially motivated. He said police comments that race was involved could miss other factors, such as nonracial taunting.

“Unfortunately, like any other city, you have certain parts of town that individuals congregate in,” Abdul-Samad said. “You have those that go into that area with no problem, and those who cannot.”

And you know that our cultural elites would have every bit as much difficulty in determining 30-40 white guys savagely beating a black man and calling it “whack blacky night” was racially motivated.

You can see the puzzled police scratching their heads and pondering, “Maybe they meant ‘beatwhi teynight’.   We’d better let them off.”

You know what Obama “justice” is: “Never bring a lawsuit against a black.”  We’ve got a president who prejudges situations based on race and who basically says, “I don’t know – not having been there and not seeing all the facts – but I think it’s fair to say that those white police acted stupidly.”  And I hope all you white, dirty cracker whores out there are good with that.

Let me explain something: there is nothing more undermining of civil society than misguided “tolerance.”  If everyone is treated equally under the law, and violators are punished according to one colorblind standard, we have justice and we have peace.  Otherwise, we have one group of people taking advantage of the unfair treatment, and another group of people becoming increasingly embittered over the unfair treatment.

This is the thing.  For much of American history, black people have been unfairly discriminated against.  And that was evil.  But the one thing that saved America from massive civil unrest is that blacks were in the minority.  Now, too many black “civil rights leaders” demand that the scales be balanced by essentially discriminating against whites.

But whitey – who all too soon WILL be a minority group in America – aint one yet.  And whitey is going to increasingly get pissed off about “beat whitey nights,” and about the many forms of preferential treatment that “minorities” are regularly receiving.

Treating 79.6% of the American population in a racially biased manner is bad, bad mojo.

Which is why articles such as this Washington Times piece entitled, “Is Obama fomenting a race war?” describes an incredibly troubling trend.

Even more troubling is Obama’s own racist background, given the theology of his racist church and his racist pastor for more than twenty years.  That racism can be expressed in one quote by Jeremiah Wright’s favorite theologian:

“If God is not for us and against white people,” writes Cone, “then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community.”

That’s not just “beat whitey,” but “kill whitey.”  And a man who imbibed that The Audacity of Hope” came directly from a Jeremiah Wright sermon in which Wright said, “white folks’ greed runs a world in need.”

Some white groups – and some black groups and some Hispanic groups, for that matter – have been planning for a race war.  If you don’t want to see one, demand one standard of equality under the law.  If you WANT to see one, keep defining “racism” as something like this:

“[R]acism happens when members of society’s most powerful ethnic group suppresses other ethnic groups — through economic power, for example, or by having the power of the majority group.”

Such that blacks like Samir Shabazz who said the following –

SHABAZZ:  I hate white people.  All of them!  Every last iota of a cracker, I hate him!  You want freedom? You’re going to have to kill some crackers! You’re going to have kill some of their babies.

Samir: We didn’t come out here to play. There is to much serious business going on in your black community to be sliding through south street with white, dirty cracker whores on your arms. What’s a matter with you black man, you got a doomsday with a white woman on your arm.
“We keep begging white people for freedom. No wonder we’re not free. Your enemy can not make you free fool. You want freedom you’re going to have to kill some crackers. You’re going to have to kill some of their babies.

Let us get our act together. It’s time to wake up, clean up, and stand up.”

“I can’t wait for the day that they’re all dead. I won’t be completely happy until I see our people free and Whitey dead.”

“When you have 10 brothers in uniform, suited and booted and ready for war, white folks know these niggas ain’t their niggas. We kick white folks asses. We take it right to the cracker.”

We’re going to keep putting our foot up the white man’s ass until they understand completely. We want freedom, justice and mutha[expletive]‘ equality. Period. If you ain’t gonna give it to us, mutha[expletive], we’re gonna take it, in the name of freedom.”

– by some bizarre standard of political correctness can’t possibly be racist because the very concept of “racism” has been so radically redefined to suit the ideology of the rabid left.

Such definitions, and the far-leftist racial groups that advance them, are evil.  Allow me to provide a definition: “‘Racism’ is when people believe that members of any race or racial group are biologically or morally inferior based solely or primarily upon race.”

One can hate one’s own race, by the way.  For example, Karl Marx was a Jew-hating Jew.  And an ideology based in part on the racist hatred of his own people resulted in the murder of over a million Jews inside the Soviet Union.  Not only that, but there is evidence that Adolf Hitler – the rabid anti-Semite – had Jewish genes as well.

If radical race-based political groups keep pushing their racist policies and standards of labeling one racial group as inherently racist, while defining their own groups as incapable of the stain of racism, there is trouble coming.  Because the political-correctness-protected class can literally get away with anything, even as the overwhelming majority of Americans becomes increasingly angry.  Think of the “black rage” defense, which would have been utterly unimaginable in previous times.  In these awful economic times, that mindset will be like gasoline poured on a growing fire of unrest.

Jesus Himself prophesied that in the last days, “race will rise against race” (Matthew 24:7).  Jesus used the word “ethnos,” meaning “ethnic group,” “race.”

Jesus said it, and it’s coming.  But please, PLEASE, don’t rush the day of destruction.

Update, August 26: Am I right, or am I right? From an article reporting that the Aryan Nations is coming to Iowa:

The Aryan Nations may be headed to Des Moines, Iowa. Why? Because the Des Moines, Iowa police department say they cannot confirm racial motives behind the “beat whitey night” assaults at the Iowa State Fair. The Des Moines, Register reports that the police now say that they cannot confirm that anyone said “beat whitey night”.  This is contrary to the reports immediately following the assaults.  An officer was even on TV and said that they were likely racially motivated attacks. […]

City Councilman Bryan Meyer said he didn’t want the Aryan Nations coming to Des Moines. Saying that they could take care of their own problems. Maybe the Aryan Nations view the handling of beat whitey night like the rest of us. It isn’t being handled.

Let me make it clear: I don’t want the Aryan Nations coming to Des Moines either.  And the best way to handle this moment and this event is to treat this black racist mob the identical same way we would treat a white racist mob.

Reverse racial discrimination fuels more and then more racial discrimination like nothing else.  We need to end this leftist radical stupidity and hold ALL people accountable for their actions and their attitudes.  Or America will face the bitter consequences.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 Responses to “PC Police Unable To Determine If ‘Beat Whitey Night’ Attacks Racially Motivated, And The Growing Unrest”

  1. HL Says:

    REALLY troubling article, but I’m grateful to be informed. This CRAP has got to stop along with the blame Bush crap.
    WHAT an absolute dangerous disaster Obama and the Left’s stupid agenda is for America.

  2. kangrudy Says:

    helpfull information. thank’s

  3. Michael Eden Says:

    “Racism” is a club that the evil left have been using against conservatives for years.

    As with everything else, the truth is the exact opposite of what the left asserts.

    It’s time to take the club of “racism” away from Democrats and start pounding them over the head with it. But even more, it’s time to demand that people be treated equally and fairly under the law. This “double-standard” and “reverse racism” crap has got to stop. Before we see an explosion unlike anything we’ve ever seen since the Civil War (you know, that war where Republicans had to fight a bloody war with Democrats to free the slaves).

  4. repentent Says:

    Oh Lord, please forgive me for being white. Give me the wisdom and perseverance to suffer the punishment for what our white forefathers did to the blacks. Blacks do not believe your grace is sufficient, regardless of our repentance. Please give me the strength to work harder, pay more taxes, and do without so that our black brothers and sisters can have the government welfare they truly deserve. Lord, theirs is the kingdom that we must pay for. Accept us into your kingdom Lord and let them have theirs. Amen

  5. Michael Eden Says:

    From James Cone, the theologian of choice for Barack Obama’s “spiritual guide” Jeremiah Wright:

    CONE: “If the powerful in our society, the white people, if they want to become Christians, they have to give up that power and become identified with the powerless — if you’re going to be a Christian, you can’t be identified with the powerful and also a Christian at the same time…

    The only way in which your repentance, your forgiveness can be authentic, your reception of it can be authentic, your repentance can be authentic, is that you give back what you took — and white people took a lot from black people.”

    Amazingly, by Cone’s, Wright’s, and Obama’s theology, a black gangbanging murderer drug dealer is “saved.” But that little old white grandma who has loved Jesus all her life is going to hell.

  6. jphenna Says:

    …the struggle among themselves arises less from inner aversion than from hunger and love. In both cases, Nature looks on calmly, with satisfaction, in fact. In the struggle for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less determined succumb, while the struggle of the males for the female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the healthiest. And struggle is always a means for improving a species’ health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher development.

  7. Michael Eden Says:

    Ah, the introduction of Darwinian thought to the racism of the left.

    Darwin’s full title was “On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life.” And he said such stuff as:

    At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes … will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla” (Descent of Man, p. 178).

    Here is a compendium of quotes by Charles Darwin that give the white man sanction to crush those not entirely like himself. Some examples:

    – “It might also naturally be enquired whether man, like so many other animals, has given rise to varieties and sub-races, differing but slightly from each other, or to races differing so much that they must be classed as doubtful species?

    – “Finally, it may not be a logical deduction, but to my imagination it is far more satisfactory to look at such instincts as the young cuckoo ejecting its foster-brothers, ants making slaves, the larvae of ichneumonidae feeding within the live bodies of caterpillars, not as specially endowed or created instincts, but as small consequences of one general law leading to the advancement of all organic beings–namely, multiply, vary, let the strongest live and the weakest die.”

    Some more interesting observations about Darwin’s racism:

    Darwin wrote that he would rather be descended from a monkey than from a “savage.” In describing those with darker skin, he often used words like “savage,” “low,” and “degraded” to describe American Indians, pygmies, and almost every ethnic group whose physical appearance and culture differed from his own.

    In the 1860s, around the time of the abolition of slavery, Darwinism made its way to American shores. It was used to justify racism against blacks, as well as the elimination of “savage native tribes” who hindered westward expansion in the name of “manifest destiny.”

    Liberals have worked very hard to make their beloved godless atheism untainted by racism. But it’s founded on a fundamental lie. If Darwinism and the survival of the fittest works with all the animals, and if humans are animals uncreated by God as His unique image bearers, then the Darwinian principle works for humans, too. Obviously, blacks or “Negroes” are at the very least a sub-species of human, competing with a different subspecies of humans called “Caucasians” or whites (as Darwin stated). And by the standard of Darwinism, which liberals love, blacks are easily shown to be inferior (I mean, just LOOK AT AFRICA!!!). And therefore it is no crime to do unto the inferior races what the animals do (supplant them, enslave them, and drive them into extinction).

    That paragraph cited by jphenna also gives males sanction to rape. It’s part of the biological necessity, which Nature smiles down upon. The whole thing about evolution is leaving behind the fittest offspring, and it is within every man to want to be the fittest. And since males BECOME the fittest by leaving behind the most offspring, and since Darwinian survival of the fittest trumps artificial human morality, well, ergo sum, rape away.

    And, of course, Darwinism strictly implies social Darwinism. If Darwinism is actually TRUE, and not a crock of crap, then we ought to live as though it were true, and the rich should crush the poor into little tiny pieces, and then eat those pieces.

    I hasten to add that I don’t believe the vile crap above, because I don’t believe in godless evolution. I believe that man was created in the image of God. But the left has to have all sorts of hypocrisy to maintain their views.

    The Nazis embraced Darwinian principles, and the Holocaust was the fruit of that embrace. The Nazis extended Darwinian principles to their logical conclusion, recognized that they could 1) harness Darwinism and 2) help Darwinism along by exterminating the Jews in their quest for the Darwinian superman.

    “Darwinism led—in a pretty much straight line—to Nazism and the Holocaust.” Ben Stein rightly declared.

    For the record, the quote cited by jphenna came from Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf. And if it does not conform to Darwinian evolution, please explain precisely how Hitler got evolution wrong in this reference.


    Today, Darwinism and evolutionary thinking also enable ordinary, respectable professionals — otherwise dedicated to the saving of life — to justify their involvement in the slaughter of millions of unborn human beings, who (like the Aborigines of earlier Darwinian thinking) are also deemed “not yet fully human.”

  8. rphenna Says:

    “From the ‘Preservation of favored races in the struggle for life’ [that is, Darwin ‘s subtitle to Origin of Species] it was a short step to the preservation of favored individuals, classes or nations – and from their preservation to their glorification . . . Thus, it has become a portmunteau of nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and dictatorship, of the cults of the hero, the superman, and the master race . . . recent expressions of this philosophy, such as Mein Kampf are, unhappily, too familiar to require exposition here.” – Gertrude Himmelfarb, Social Darwinism in American Thought, 1962

    Substitute “favored races” with Blacks.

    Substitue “favored individuals, classes or nations – and from their preservation to their glorification . . . ” with Blacks.

    Substitue “a portmunteau of nationalism, imperialism, militarism, and dictatorship, of the cults of the hero, the superman, and the master race” with the Obama administration.

    There you have it.

  9. Michael Eden Says:

    There IS a difference between our modern liberal fascists and Hitler’s Nazism, we should point out. Hitler wanted to cooperate with evolution to help weed out those whom he believed were biologically unfit. He wanted to create his superman, and wanted to cooperate with Darwinism. Just as with Peter Singer (who uses a criterion for “personhood” that babies can’t attain until they’re about 3 years old, allowing for infanticide of human beings at younger ages), Hitler was evil, but had a consistent view.

    Hitler also said:

    “If the German Volk is not strong enough and is not sufficiently prepared to offer its own blood for its existence, it should cease to exist and be destroyed by a stronger power.”

    He said, “If WE NAZIS aren’t strong enough to survive, then we should likewise be replaced by a stronger Darwinian power.” Again, consistency.

    Not so today’s liberals. They cling to evolution more because they hate God than anything else. And rather than allow their belief in evolution to let nature take it’s course – or even to cooperate with it as Hitler thought he was doing – liberals fight evolution like an enemy. Every endangered species must continue to live in its native habitat – not matter how unfit it is for that environment or how much it costs the society at large (which is in its own struggle for existence). And, of course, the same with the human equivalents.

    And while conservative and religious people seek to help the poor and the underachieving by helping them to become better, stronger people who can help themselves, not so liberals. No, they want to fund these people and actually aid them in their very dysfunction. They want to promote and celebrate lifestyle dysfunction. They want to promote the Darwinian dead-ends qua Darwinian dead ends. They want to hang the dysfunctional around the necks of the functional like the proverbial Mariner’s albatross.

    As one example, let’s take the Darwinian dead-end of homosexuality, who can’t reproduce in an era when we aren’t producing enough children to replace ourselves, and who inflict incredibly costly diseases such as AIDS upon society at a time when our medical costs are already out-of-control as it is, and let’s impose that on society. Let’s FORCE society to be less fit in the Darwinian sense. Liberals don’t bother to even try to explain how that makes sense in a Darwinian context (and Darwinism is their Creator God as much as the Triune Godhead is to the Christian). Because they’re hypocrites and moral and rational consistency doesn’t matter to them.

    Liberals are the kind of moral and mental perverts who acclaim evolution and place the mantel of “science” and “reason” on their heads, and then proceed to do everything they can to undermine the very thing they acclaim.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: