Firing Empress Pelosi As Speaker And Hiring Republican John Boehner Already Saving Americans HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS

Nothing but the best for Empress Pelosi when she was Speaker of the House.

And so what?  You were paying for it; and you’re just a pissant peasant proletariat taxpayer.

Reported back in May 2010:

Every time the speaker boards her personal military aircraft it costs the taxpayers approximately $28,000 a flight. The leader of the people’s House should travel just like everyone else.” […]

Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by Judicial Watch, which investigates and prosecutes government corruption, show Pelosi incurred expenses of some $2.1 million for her use of Air Force jets for travel over a recent two-year period. […]

Judicial Watch said the 2,000 pages of documentation it obtained showed Pelosi’s military travel cost the U.S. Air Force $2,100,744.59 over two years – including $101,429.14 for in-flight expenses, including food and alcohol.

Incoming House Speaker Rep. John Boehner underscores that Empress Pelosi’s military flights were unnecessary, wasteful and extravagant.  Not to mention incredibly hypocritical – coming from a woman who constantly polluted the atmosphere with her own hot air self-righteously talking about how “green” she and the Democrats were.

Unlike Nancy Pelosi, John Boehner values the taxpayers’ money.  Unlike Pelosi, Boehner doesn’t think he’s entitled to spectacular largess.

“Over the last 20 years, I have flown back and forth to my district on commercial aircraft. And I’m going to continue to do that.”

New Republican House Majority Leader Boehner also said:

“I told my constituents, in a primary in 1990, that if they thought my job was to come to Washington and rob the public treasury on their behalf, they were voting for the wrong guy. I said it, I mean it, that’s who I am, and I’ve never taken [an earmark].”

Versus San Fran Nan, who took a $30 million slice of cheese to save some stupid mouse with stimulus money.  And who asked for another $106 million more in earmarks from next year’s federal budget.  Just for a couple of recent examples among many.

Pretty damn refreshing.

Buh-bye, Nancy.  When you clean your desk out, please take that great big giant sanctimonious gavel out along with your heavily plasticized face.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Firing Empress Pelosi As Speaker And Hiring Republican John Boehner Already Saving Americans HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS”

  1. Robert Branscomb Says:

    You are the perfect example of the value of being an American..
    you get to rant your ignorance and hatered and not get arrested or shot..on the other hand you still get all the benefits of being an American..I don’t agree with you but as most vets have done..we fight to protect your view..a word of advise..
    since it seems to be very important to your cause and rants..let’s spend equal time on how much this war has cost us and all the fraud of contractors and what happen to the oil money that was going to pay for it and who benefits from the war, so far all we get in return is we pulled down a staute and hung a guy..for a $trillion dollars and more..yikes
    and lastly all the rants of people like you that enjoy VA benefit, SS benifits..Medicaid, and Medicare…ect ect..
    Happy Thanksgiving..

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    Well, Robert, let’s take a moment to review your post:

    #1) A fellow who says “you get to rant your ignorance” is truly throwing stones in glass houses when he proceeds to horrendously misspell practically the very next word after bitching about my “ignorance” in his own rant. It’s not “hatered” you’re demonstrating in your post, you dumbass; it’s “hatred.”

    #2) You allege that I’m ranting my ignorance; but you can’t manage to find even so much as a single thing that is ignorant about what I said. That kind of makes YOU the ignorant one, doesn’t it? You liberal retards who drive-by with ad hominems divorced from any kind of evidence or meaningful argument just make me sick.

    #3) You want to spend “equal time,” and then invoke as your example what is clearly a fallacious comparison. I compared Nancy Pelosi’s wasteful travel to John Boehner’s promise of costing the taxpayer minimal cost. And then I compare Pelosi’s wasteful earmarks to Boehner’s documented history of never taking earmarks. That’s apples to apples, you stupid turd. What do YOU do? You say that a direct comparison is “ranting my ignorance” and then proceed to compare apples to anvils instead.

    But not only is your example a fallacious comparison, but it’s not even true. Maybe if Obama had pulled all troops out of both Afghanistan (Obama has MASSIVELY INCREASED our costs in Afghanistan) and pulled all troops immediately out of Iraq, it might be valid. But your liberal is spending just as much as Bush did, even as his causalities in Afghanistan are skyrocketing. Last month was the worst American causality total since the war began.

    As for your last point, what an ass. You pass these liberal wastes of billions of dollars, and then demand that even though I’m paying for it as much (and quite probably more) than you, I shouldn’t use it because I was opposed to it to begin with. Social Security is a Ponzi scheme that would be illegal if anyone but the government had done it. We’ve got some $200 trillion in unfunded liabilities because these programs did exactly what conservatives said they’d do a generation ago. But I’ve had tens of thousands of dollars seized from my pay in “contributions,” and now I’m supposed to kiss off my contributions because the same stupid liberals who forced the program down my throat now say I shouldn’t be able to get my money back??? Only a genuine idiot says that the government should be able to seize your money in taxes, and then deny you the right to use the programs that your government seized your money to fund. Just what species of dumbass are you, anyway?

    So kindly kiss off. There’s no point wasting time arguing with a fool.

    Beyond all that, Happy Thanksgiving to you, also.

  3. kayinmaine Says:

    Actually, the reason why Pelosi got to fly on a military plane is because the Sargeant of Arms chose that big plane for her. Why did they choose it? Because she lives in California. California is a long trip, so the SofA felt it would better protect her for her to be on a larger plane than flying commercially which could result in layovers (and we know how the right wing is: they might try to take a shot at her! The SofA knows this and that’s why they didn’t want to take any chances!). Flying from DC to Ohio is nothing compared to flying all the way to the West Coast from the East Coast.

  4. Michael Eden Says:


    Um, no. Not.

    This will probably astonish you, but as someone who has flown commercial aircraft I can assure you that many of them are quite large and are actually capable (yes, I know this will leave you stunned) of flying across the country.

    I know, I know, kayinmaine, you thought only the GOVERNMENT could possibly design a plane that wouldn’t drop out of the sky before it made it to Iowa. But you’re wrong.

    Hey, but that’s a really super try for you to justify whatever your empress does. And I congratulate you for your drinking as much Kool-Aid as you possibly can.

    Btw, what is a “Sargeant of Arms”? I’m guessing he’s the guy who let’s liberals get away with murder?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: