Gay Military: Something America Needs Like A Massive WikiLeak

Well, what would have been absolutely freaking unthinkable to our first commander-in-chief, George Washington, has finally happened: we’ve got a gay military now.

I feared this from the outset of the Obama presidency and wrote it up in tones of irony and as much derision as I could muster:

Heck, I’ve got an even better idea.  Liberals have thought excluding gays from the military was so danged unfair and discriminatory.  Why don’t we “swing the other way,” and have a “Gay All The Way!” military?  Maybe – in the name of tolerance – you might allow a few token heterosexuals in as long as they don’t reveal that politically incorrect sexual orientation of theirs.  It’s time to gear up for battle, Rump Rangers; you’re going to need to feed a lot of red meat into the grinder once the world’s dictators realize that the President of God Damn America is an appeasing weakling.  You can use those superior compromising skills of yours to deal with Iran unleashing terrorist hell once your Messiah-President does nothing while Iranian President Ahmadinejab develops nuclear weapons so they can launch terrorism-by-proxy strikes on us with impunity.

The new God Damn America could augment its “Gay All The Way!” status with women who believe that being excluded from being able to do anything a man can do is discriminatory.  They can start walking sustained patrols while carrying a hundred pounds of extra weight in 110 degree heat, and be the ones who try to keep all their body parts intact while running and dodging with fifty pound combat loads.  Good luck with that, girls.  The guys carry that; surely you can do it too.  And don’t worry; you won’t have any heterosexual males around who would let that insulting and patronizing chivalry of theirs get in the way of your NOW-feminist-style equality.  You’ll get the chance to develop that upper body strength of yours digging your own fighting positions out of the rock hard clay.

It is absolutely stunning that we have these disastrous leaks revealing literally hundreds of thousands of pages of US government secrets at the hands of a homosexual soldier, and the very next thing we do is provide for the creation of another hundred thousand Private Bradley Mannings.

I would have thought the theft and release of 250,000 top secret documents would have made the “intelligentsia” pause about the wisdom of recruiting homosexuals who have a documented history of super-massive hissy fits.  But nope.  That would be the sane thing to do; and we can’t have that.  Onward ye proverbial lemmings!  Mush!  Mush!!!

Irony aside, and Bradley Manning aside, I thought this article from Townhall nailed the biggest reasons why this thing is going to be a disaster:

Obama’s New ‘Gay’ Force
Kevin McCullough

With the passage of the law to repeal the Clinton-era legislation commonly referred to as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” President Obama enters into a new reality. In one last blaze of defiance of the American people, and expressly those who serve in our nation’s armed forces, President Obama was able to shove social engineering into pretty much the very corner of American culture where we have no business doing so.

Upon his signature President Obama will begin a process that will at the very least disrupt operations, and at the very worst see the eventual weakening of our armed forces.

Throughout the entirety of this debate I’ve had questions, none of which seemed to be answered or even asked in the congressional sessions dealing with the matter.

From a purely pragmatic standpoint perhaps someone could answer them now, since I’m especially sure that President Obama wouldn’t push for such a fundamental transformation of our military without good answers to them.

1. What happens to housing, on base and in theater?

If it is morally questionable to have men and women housed together because of the sexual tension that exists between primarily men who would be predatorily interested in the women they might shower with or frequently be seen in the act of dressing and undressing on a regular basis, why is it any different if you have identified the predatory homosexual male who might have an unrequited “thing” for a fellow service member? If it is proper to keep men and women housed separately do we now go to four sets of housing. Men who don’t engage in homosexual activity, Men who do, Women who don’t, Women who do? Practically speaking Mr. President how do you get past the fundamental sexual tension that will be present the minute some make it known?

2. Do you expect the military system or the civilian courts to deal with the influx of phony sexual harassment cases to follow?

Consider this issue a prediction of sorts, but take it to the bank that those who engage in open homosexuality will feel the freedom if not the need begin to portray themselves as victims of harassment pretty much anytime something doesn’t go their way. And it may not require anything all that severe to trigger it. A drill instructor gets a little too rough in his language while trying to beat the “sissy” out of a recruit in basic training or Officer Candidate School and the backlog will commence.

3. Will base commanders be required to host “pride” events that allow for similar conduct to the x-rated displays that go on in the nation’s cities each year?

There was much discussion in the Senate and House hearings about the issue of morale, the breakdown of structure, the significance of discipline and the ability to command respect and a readied force. Nothing related to any “pride” event ever held comes close to anything resembling respect, discipline, or structure. There is a reason our best volunteer to serve their nation, and it has nothing to do with speedos, bump or grind.

4. Will all other sexual conduct be made legal as well?

It is still a crime to commit adultery in active military duty, and even more so for officers. How can you possibly be allowing for the flamboyancy of effeminate male soldiers to engage in sexual conduct and their notorious ever wandering lust for the new on one hand, and hold court martial for those who have discreetly hidden their sexual escapades while destroying their families?

There are many legitimate reasons why the military is not the place to run experiments on the restructuring of the society at large.

For the leftist idiots who will scream the meme that, “every other nation on the planet already does it,” shut up!

None of those military forces are the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marines.

I know the progressive elites in the nation awake this morning feeling better about what has been done to the U.S. Military in this vote. I know this President has never served and likely barely knows anyone who has. I know that the godless in our nation think this is all a tremendous step forward.

In the hundreds of conversations I’ve had with those that serve in our nation’s armed forces, from Naval F-18 aviators to Army Rangers, Marine specialists to Air Force pilots of B2 stealth bombers, C130s, and military drones, the view of the military is clear. They serve to focus on the mission at hand, not because they may or may not display pictures of their romantic interests in the living quarters.

I know that our military has been the best in the world, and that they deserved to be listened to when they spoke clearly from the four branches to the President. The head of each branch clearly made the case for not allowing the military to become a place where the focus of our troops was placed on when and how they can have sex, instead of achieving their mission.

But now that reality has been thrust upon us. It is a focus of magnificent distraction, and in terms of operational priorities it is of miniscule importance.

It was President Obama’s doing, and the results that follow will be laid at his feet.

Another set of questions by a Marine that no one ever asked about ending “Don’t Ask” can be found here.

In my “day” in the Army, soldiers in the infantry that I served in just would not have tolerated openly homosexual soldiers.  There would have been blanket parties galore, until the gay-berets got the message that they were most definitely not wanted.  I don’t know that that will happen today, but I just can’t imagine the mindset has changed that much in the years I’ve been out (by which I mean out of the military, and not, you know, “out”).

I heard a Democrat representative today say that the military is having a hard time keeping up its recruiting goals, and so therefore it’s stupid to deny thousands of gay men and women the opportunity to serve.  What that omits is the fact that there are a lot of heterosexual men and women who don’t want to be forced to shower and sleep right next to same-sex soldiers who may well want nothing more than to have “sexual relations” with them.  There are also a lot of young men who continue to have something of that Judeo-Christian worldview who rightly believe that homosexuality is a serious moral issue, and these young men aren’t going to want to be forced to trust people that they don’t trust with their lives.

“Missile defense” is about to take on a whole new meaning.

It will be interesting to see if the infantry units – you know, the guys who basically do all of the fighting and most of the dying – are going to see significant drops in enlistment.  The Marine Corps will be an interesting place to look, since “infantry” enlistment figures are hard to find.

One thing I definitely don’t expect to see is huge swells in enlistment, as all of those homosexuals suddenly join up and fill the ranks.  If I’m wrong, you’ll see – based on statistics homosexuals offer – that the US military will suddenly have 143,000 more enlistments, as that 10% of the population that are homosexual suddenly rush to join up.  The thing is that these people didn’t want a gay military so they could join it; they wanted a gay military so they could ruin it.  Just like marriage.

The liberal ideologues whom we just appeased are not the people who will serve.  The people who will serve just got served an in-your-face insult.

The same people who want homosexuals in the military are the same people who think WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is a rock star for publishing every stolen classified American document he can get his filthy paws on.

This was a terrible and an immoral decision, which is all the more terrible and immoral for occurring during time of war.

The left always points to Europe or “other countries” and say that we should do what they do.  A few things are wrong with that: one of them emerges from Thomas Jefferson’s words, “With all the defects in our Constitution, whether general or particular, the comparison of our government with those of Europe, is like a comparison of Heaven with Hell.”  To wit: why on earth would we want to be like Europe?  Another emerges from the question, “WHAT PART OF EUROPE ARE YOU FROM? THE PART WHOSE ASS WE SAVED, OR THE PART WHOSE ASS WE KICKED?” To wit: why on earth would we want to be like Europe.  And yet another emerges from the question why European nations aren’t bothering to stand up and fight for freedom?  Europeans aren’t sending troops to Afghanistan; the troops they do send don’t fight; and most European Union nations are failing to spend even the minimum 2% of their GDP on defense, as required.  To wit: why on earth would we want to be like Europe?

Now we’re way down the path to becoming useless, pathetic and apathetic Europe, only with deodorant.

If homosexual men and women really wanted to serve their country – rather than further break down our nation and its social structures more than they already have – then they would have continued to volunteer and serve their country, rather than imposing their rabid homosexual agenda onto those who just want to defend their country.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

27 Responses to “Gay Military: Something America Needs Like A Massive WikiLeak”

  1. HL Says:

    Michael, we were sick over the passage of this legislation. Thank you for this commentary and putting into words what God fearing, decent patrioitc Americans are feeling over this ungodly legislation.

  2. Michael Eden Says:


    “Sick” is a good description. It is a good description of the poisonous legislation and its effect on America, and it’s a good description as to how people like you and I – and I have no doubt the core of the military community – feel about this disgusting piece of social engineering.

  3. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    “Missile defense” is about to take on a whole new meaning.

    Only MichaelE…only MichaelE…roflmho!!!

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    Thanks for noticing that one, Dauntless.

    I was pretty pleased with myself over that one.

    I never tell anyone I’m funny. But I do have to admit, I make myself laugh all the time…

    It’s even better when someone laughs with me (you know, rather than AT me).

  5. David E Says:

    I can’t believe the Demogods passed it. I am glad I am retired from the US Army and don’t have to worry about dropping the soap while being in a common shower with these sickos. I am sure there will be a flood of “straight” people knocking the doors down to join the armed forces, yea….right! I can just visualize all of the Gay Sickos in drag going out the gate to head down town to party. If a bullet doesn’t get them, maybe aids will.

  6. Michael Eden Says:


    I know exactly how you feel. Of everything that’s been done to this country – even ObamaCare – this makes me feel the most nauseated. Because that was MY Army Obama just crapped on with his social engineering. I feel it personally.

    The people who wanted this hate the military. They’re the kind of people who self-righteously kept ROTC out of various universities just because they found whatever excuse to do it and feel righteous about doing it.

    If it wasn’t “they’re discriminating against gays!” it would have been something else. The actual reason is they hate the military and would love nothing more than to see it destroyed.

    We’re both retired from the Army. I don’t doubt that your day is the same as mine: and in my day there would have been a blanket party – in which a bad apple would be surprised in his sleep and pounded on while others held his blanket down so he couldn’t get up. He’d get the crap beat out of him and nobody would be responsible for it. And that punk would get the message pretty darn quick.

    In my day, in the infantry, we would not have tolerated an open homosexual. It just wouldn’t have been allowed to happen.

    I would not serve in this military.

    Now, some liberal will say something like, “You don’t give a damn about your country after all, do you?” And I would point to Nazi Germany, and ask that lib if he’d serve his fatherland by fighting to the death for his fuhrer. Because some times the best way to serve your country is NOT to serve it when it has evil and vile policies.

    I genuinely feel sorry for NCOs who can’t leave because they have families to take care of, and can’t get a job in Obama’s screwed-up economy. You men deserve better.

  7. David E Says:

    Michael, Just wanted to wish you and yours a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. I know how helpless one can feel at times like this when there is really nothing we can do to change this situation no matter how much we love our country. It is like, if you will pardon the expression, it is like shoveling shit against the tide.

  8. JC Says:

    Hahahaahahaa look at all you hateful people, you are probably gay yourself, hate all you want, we won!

  9. Michael Eden Says:


    Are you suggesting there’s something wrong with being gay??? You seem to be.

    You also call me a “hater,” but dang if you don’t come across as chock full of hate.

    What’s interesting with your whole, “you are probably gay yourself” line is that there are in fact people who viscerally react to homosexuals, and yet are quite homosexual themselves.

    Many of them are in prisons, where they butt-rape anyone they can (but they’re hardly “gay” just because they love sodomizing other men, are they?).

    Thank you for helping underscore the fact that homosexuals are everything that the Judeo-Christian worldview basically says they are.

  10. Michael Eden Says:


    Merry Christmas to you and yours as well, and thank you.

    I think I’ve gone through that stage. My eyes were opened to the fact that the there are many American people who just were not who I thought they were. It was terribly disappointing in 2008.

    Now I’m just recongzing that the Lord is going to take me and my loved ones out of the mess that antichrists like Obama are creating, and leaving behind the best record I can to explain to those left behind why they will end up with hell on earth.

    As for your last expression, the only thing I can say is, “If there are a lot of conservatives with shovels, maybe we can turn that tide yet.” At least for a time until the ignorance and apathy of the people returns to crumble the last remaining foundations that the founding fathers built for us.

  11. David E Says:


    No one really wants to hear from you or your homo. friends so until you can join them…just suck your thumb for now.

  12. David E Says:

    Michael Eden,

    Thank you Sir. I too believe we are truely in our last days and Christ will be returning soon to the dismay of poor JC.

  13. Michael Eden Says:


    While I believe my Bible rather than pop culture and understand homosexuality to be a sin, I don’t just condemn all homosexuals.

    I’m in no way trying to imply that you do; I’m simply making this distinction to advance my own view.

    There are homosexuals who are just broken people. They were molested as children, and because of some vile predator, their whole sexuality was just destroyed. They know that there’s something wrong, but they’re trapped in homosexuality the way someone might be addicted to drugs.

    Many of these people don’t want to impose homosexuality on culture. They’re just trying to live their lives. And if they could just snap their fingers and be “straight,” they’d do it.

    I have a great deal of sympathy for this group. There but for the grace of God, as they say.

    Then there are the militant homosexuals. And they would love nothing more than impose their radical homosexual agenda, fascist-style. This group are enemies. They are dangerous. We have to fight them.

    JC is in that group.

    JC doesn’t care about the military. He doesn’t care about God. He doesn’t care about truth. He doesn’t care about right and wrong. All he cares about is his next penis-fix. And about imposing homosexuality on society whether it’s right or not, or even whether society wants it or not.

  14. David E Says:

    Well said, and I totally agree. I was raised in California where there are a lot of homosexuals. Their life style just repulses me. Have a great day.

  15. Michael Eden Says:


    I was raised in California and live there now (with various places during my time in the Army and living in Oregon during my undergraduate college years in between).

    Can’t disagree with your last thought before “Have a great day.” Homosexuality IS a repulsive lifestyle. It is morally and biologically filthy.

    When you consider the rampant homosexuality in our prisons, the homosexual pedophiolia that FAR outrepresens the homosexual population, when you consider the shockingly high numbers of the nastiest cases of STDs through the most vile sexual practices, when you consider the massive drug use, the massive incidences of domestic violence relative to heterosexual married couples, when you even consider the suicide rates, you can know for a fact that the Democrat Party is the party of genuine demonic moral evil in America today for pushing such a lifestyle.

    That said, there are people who struggle with homosexuality because they were molested by some homosexual pervert predator when they were children, and they are messed up because of what someone did TO them. I remember reading a magazine article that was very friendly to the gay agenda that pointed out that over 80% of homosexuals acknowledged having been sexually molested as children.

    I feel for those poor people.

    The militant homosexuals who have literally welcomed the demons into their minds, and seek only to inflict the horror show that is going on in their souls upon others and upon society, not so much.

  16. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE said: “Thanks for noticing that one, Dauntless.”

    Oh, btw, in the bubba years, it was known as Air Force One…well, at least according to bubba.

  17. Michael Eden Says:

    I hoped I’d never see a president as self-absorbed and as personally despicable as “Bubba.”

    There’s another “hope” that got dashed by “hope and change.”

  18. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    Dittos…to put it another way, in the eyes of bubba he had Air Force One and everyone else had those little missiles.

  19. Michael Eden Says:

    I remember watching a Military History channel program on Air Force One. It’s amazing, all the preparation for even a “routine” flight with the POTUS on board that goes on.

    I saw it before the election. And I was thinking, “Man, that slimeball Obama doesn’t deserve that.”

    Not a huge McCain fan by any means, but John McCain dedicated his life in service to his country, spent six years in a North Vietnamese hellhole, and I wouldn’t grind my teeth to think of him in Air Force One.

    Obama? He dedicated his life to using socialist “community organizing” to launch a political career and benefit enormously FROM that political career. He was and is all about Obama.

    And he ought to be flying coach on a discount carrier like Southwest Airlines. He ought to be “redistributing” Air Force One to the poor. He’s just like his spiritual mentor (and fellow Marxist) Jeremiah Wright; everyone else should give up their wealth and privileges, while these scumbags live at the highest possible level.

    John Boehner gave up his jet. You know, the one that Empress Pelosi insisted upon. Why can’t Obama finally live up to his hypocritical value system???

    These liberals make me sick. Oh, they’re just so all about the people. And then they live like kings. While the Republicans who get constantly demonized by these hypocrites routinely demonstrate FAR more generosity.

    Now look at what you did, Dauntless. You made me get on my soapbox again!!!

  20. David E Says:

    As far as I am concerned, Obama should be riding camels.

  21. Michael Eden Says:


    I’d personally rather put it thus:

    “As far as I am concerned, Obama should be hiding in Osama bin Laden’s cave.”

    But, yeah, if Obama was spending all his time on a camel, we’d only have to worry about camel crap, and not Obama crapping on our country.

  22. David E Says:

    Mike, You are right, I never thought of it that way.

  23. Michael Eden Says:

    Gosh, David, and I was thinking that maybe YOU were right.

    How about this: Obama could sleeping in Osama’s cave when Osama’s camel comes into the cave and accidentally sits on Obama’s head. And then the camel – unbalanced because Obama’s head is stuck up its butt and his scrawny body is flailing around – could plunge off a cliff with Osama riding it. Obama’s head plops out of the camel’s butt as the camel plummets off the cliff with Osama on it, but he is so overwhelmed by the experience that he resigns from office.

    If that happened, for the record, I would be willing to give Obama full credit as “the man who finally got Osama bin Laden.” I’d even be willing to agree to the claim, “Bush was stupid, but Obama used his head to get Osama.”

    And if – by means of that same chance – Joe Biden were to meet the identical fate in the cave and with the camel of whoever is now running al Qaeda, and similarly resigned following the traumatic experience – we’d have President John Boehner.

    If that happened, for the record, I would not mind if President Boehner cried during his inauguration.

  24. Robert Says:

    I am one of the “godless” referenced. I am an Atheist serving in the active duty Army. But… I think homosexuals openly serving will destroy the army that I love. We are an army of standards and discipline. Those same things the gay community is lacking. As for the 2/3rds that don’t care about gays in the military are the [profanity deleted by moderator] support MOS’s that are not out on patrol or based at a fob the size of a football field. They are the woman and men who can not or will not be on the front lines. They should not have a voice on this. Every MOS is there to support the infantry. Only the infantry should have a voice. They are the fighters.

    Faithless and Free!

  25. Michael Eden Says:


    Atheist or not, I honor you for your service to your country.

    I’m glad that we – who served, and who actually know the culture of the infantry that we love – can both agree on this one thing.

    Few who did not serve in the infantry – and particularly in the infantry during combat – have any clue the terrible sacrifices and the physical and psychological suffering that the young men who fight our wars have to endure. And to impose political correctness upon them is just absolutely vile.

    The kind of people you describe – the “chairborne rangers” who make demands far from the front lines – don’t care about this country. They blithely assume that they can do whatever the hell they want and that America will just go on and on. They undermine our military, they undermine our intelligence capability, they undermine our economy, they undermine our system of government, and don’t give a damn about the disaster they leave in their wake.

    The liberal’s view that “the military follows orders” is the same sort of crap that says, “soldiers are paid to die.” It is a cavalier disregard for our warriors; it is a contempt that could care less about making an already impossible job even harder and worse.

    Our soldiers should be worried about the enemy in front of them; they shouldn’t have to worry about the guy in the foxhole next to them, or about what the ideologues will push on them next.

  26. Anonymous Says:

    You Americans are disgusting, and the more prejudice and racist people on the planet

  27. Michael Eden Says:


    What a prejudiced and racist thing to say, you disgusting hypocrite.

    First of all, the last I checked, homosexuals don’t qualify as a “race.”

    Second, you are clearly a religious bigot, given the fact that all major religions condemn homosexuality.

    Third off, condemning all Americans? Really? And you aren’t smart enough to see what a prejucided racist hypocrite it makes you to condemn an entire nation of more than 300 million people based on one American guy’s blog???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: