Now Official: Arizona Shooter Jared Loughner A Bush-Hating Liberal

One can only look at the moral and psychological insanity of the left and whistle in amazement.

The demonic left heard that a Democrat U.S. Representative had been shot (never mind that she was one of the more conservative Democrats in the House) and immediately concluded that a Republican conservative tea party member – well, make that ALL Republicans, ALL conservatives and ALL tea party members – were guilty of the crime.

Democrats IMMEDIATELY resorted to the worst kind of demonizing, hatred and lies:

Arizona State Rep. Linda Lopez – a leftwing Democrat – stated:

”the shooter is likely, from what I’ve heard, an Afghan vet..”

Why would this vile woman falsely demonize our war veterans?

All you have to do is contemplate the title of an article I wrote on April 14, 2009: “Obama Administration Says Americans Should Fear Their Combat Veterans.” The article referred to an Obama DHS memo that warned that war veterans were to be considered dangerous rightwing extremists.

But that was a lie.  Jared Loughner never served a day in the military, let alone pull a combat tour.  In fact, the Army threw him out of one of their recruiting stations when they found out he was a pothead.

But let’s see.  According to the Gallup polling:

“Support for legalizing marijuana is much lower among Republicans than it is among Democrats…”

Rep. Lopez also immediately blamed the tea party for the assassination.

Paul Krugman demonstrated that all you have to do these days to get a Nobel Prize is be a far-left liberal ideologue.  His column demonizing conservatives for the Arizona shooting was published all of 2 hours after the event.  And like everything else the man has ever said, not a single word of it was anything short of propaganda (not to forget to mention the fact that Krugman has his own documented “gale of anger” problems).

For all the vicious hate and lies from the left, what we found when we actually looked at the facts is that Jared Loughner had a grudge against Rep. Gabrielle Giffords dating back to 2007.  That grudge predated Sarah Palin; it predated the Tea Party movement; it predated the so-called “rightwing rhetoric” against Barack Obama.  And to go further, we find that, in fact, Loughner’s hatred of Rep. Giffords actually occurred during the LEFTWING hatred targeting George W. Bush and Republicans.  And we find that while Loughner nowhere in any of his writings or videos mentioned Sarah Palin, the tea party movement, ObamaCare, conservatives, or anything “right wing,” he DID repeatedly mention his über-leftwing belief that George Bush was responsible for engineering the 9/11 attacks.

So let’s set aside the circumstantial evidence that Jared Loughner was far more leftwing than he was rightwing.  Let’s set aside the fact that he was a devotee of The Communist Manifesto.  Let’s put aside the fact that “A classmate of the man accused of shooting Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords this morning describes him as ‘left wing’ and a pot head.'” Let’s put aside the fact that Loughner never listened to conservative talk radio, surfed conservative sights, or read conservative writers like Mark Levin.  Let’s even put aside the fact that Jared Loughner loved far-left conspiracy theory documentaries such as “Zeitgeist” and “Loose Change”.  In the words of a friend:

“There was a lot of talk about lucid dreaming and understanding reality. . . . And there were a lot of books and movies . . . things that I never would have heard about or watched — things like Loose Change about the 9/11 conspiracy.”

According to reviews, Zeitgeist is anti-Christian, anti-George Bush and anti-capitalism.  And I just scratch my head bleeding wondering which of the two parties would be those three things.  The plot of Loose Change can be summed up in three words” Bush did it.

Let’s put aside that Jared Loughner never bothered with rightwing stuff.  Let’s put aside that Jared Loughner filled his sick mind with leftwing stuff.

Let’s just put aside the facts which all line up to say that if Jared Loughner was anything, he was a far-left liberal loon.

And let’s just put the icing on the cake.  Was Jared Loughner a conservative or was he a liberal?  Let’s ask the liberal “newspaper of record,” a.k.a. The New York Times:

He became intrigued by antigovernment conspiracy theories, including that the Sept. 11 attacks were perpetrated by the government and that the country’s central banking system was enslaving its citizens. His anger would well up at the sight of President George W. Bush, or in discussing what he considered to be the nefarious designs of government.”

Bingo.  If The New York Slimes says it, it clearly must be true.

Jared Loughner was a liberal.

If you listen to or watch or read any source that ever once mentioned that right wing rhetoric or conservative anger or any such thing contributed to the Tucson, Arizona shooting, you are tuning in to a demonstrated source of propaganda and lies.

Every Democrat politician (and like the demons who called themselves “Legion, for we are many” in Luke 8:30, they are legion) and mainstream media figure who alluded to conservative anger in this tragedy should be forced to resign in disgrace for their disgrace of the truth.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Now Official: Arizona Shooter Jared Loughner A Bush-Hating Liberal”

  1. Jeff Lange Says:

    You begin by categorizing the left as the “demonic” left, then you accuse Democrats of resorting to “the worst kind of demonizing”. It would be difficult to demonize a group in a more direct manner than your own.

    You end by demonizing the left again, comparing Democrats to demons in the Bible. In-between kicking things off with demonizing and ending things with demonizing, you accuse the left of demonizing — when you’re not busy calling the left “vile” or “vicious”. I’m not sure why anyone would take you seriously.

  2. dethspud Says:

    Jar-head was a classic pot smoking, paranoid, gold standard embracing, Ayn Rand reading RW nutbar of the Ron Paul variety.

    Nice try.

    Thanx fer playin’.

  3. Michael Eden Says:


    You’re right. My side has no right whatsoever to complain that YOUR side exploited a tragedy to invent a bunch of lies and say MY side was responsible when there was no such connection.

    And how dare MY side respond when YOUR side tells hateful lies? Because, when MY side points out how evil the lies YOUR side told, aren’t we being hateful???

    Your post omits the fact that it was YOU and YOUR side who started this. On YOUR misleading view of things, I’m merely doing the “same thing” my side accuses your side of doing. Because you’re too personally dishonest to mention the numerous Democrat politicians who immediately demonized conservatives; you’re too personally dishonest to mention the fact that Paul Krugman – a pedicured liberal elite – was demonizing my side within two hours of the event.

    On your morally idiotic view, when a jackbooted thug stomps on the face of an innocent person, the “innocent person” becomes the scumbag the moment he tries to protect himself from the jackbooted thug by fighting back, and the jackbooted thug – who was the one who started the fight by stomping on the face of the innocent person – becomes the victim and the hero.

    I just published an article that pointed out that CNN had repeatedly used words like “crosshairs” on SARAH PALIN and on Michelle Bachmann before demonizing Palin for the same thing and before essentially saying, “We’re not like Sarah Palin; we’re not going to use ‘hateful’ words like “crosshairs.”

    This constant double standard by the left – by people like you, who get in conservatives’ faces for “hate speech” while you let your side run wild with hate – simply pisses me off to no end.

    Why don’t you try being honest for just once in your life? You don’t want to end the anger and hate; you just want to keep conservatives from feeling like they can fight back with your PC bullcrap.

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    Well let’s see, dumbspud,

    “Jar-head” was in fact NOT a jarhead. He did not serve a single second in the Marines. You are dishonest for importing a historically-used label that falsely implies he was a Marine or any member of the armed forces whatsoever. He was – as you point out – a “pot smoking” loon. Of that Gallup points out:

    “Support for legalizing marijuana is much lower among Republicans than it is among Democrats…”

    Now, to the extent that Ron Paul supports pot or opposes it, it is nevertheless the LEFT that are the pot-smoking hippies. Always has been, and always WILL be.

    I go back in my mind to the Vietnam War – where pot-smoking liberals threw feces at conservative military types – and think how profoundly dishonest you are in your project.

    By portraying Loughner as a “Jar-head” and by portraying a “pot smoker” as a conservative, you manage to turn recorded history on its head in a manner that I frankly find as amazing as I find it contemptible.

    But further…

    Aside from the fact that Loughner’s “favorites” included The Communist Manifesto and video of American flag burning, I would also respond to your Ayn Rand thing by repeating what I myself have said about Ayn Rand long before you came along:

    The anti-Reagan junk aside, you should be aware that very few conservatives are followers of Ayn Rand. Rand was an atheist who denounced Ronald Reagan over abortion. I most definitely am not a follower of Ayn Rand. Most of her philosophy is repulsive to me, just as it is repulsive to anybody who derives their moral/ethical system from God and from religious foundations.

    Let me put it this way: you despise Ayn Rand for her laissez-faire attitudes supporting free market capitalism; I hope that you are consistent and despise her for her celebration of personal freedom and individuality at the expense of government power that homosexuals enthusiastically endorsed.

    I simply reject as absurd your throwing Ayn Rand at me, Reagan, conservatives, or anybody else, and then ignoring the stuff she put out that you very likely support. That is just plain intellectually dishonest.

    Ayn Rand was an atheist and an adherent to a philosophy of objectivism which any consistent conservative rejects. It depends on elements of Nietzschean atheism, Freudian illusionism (also atheistic) and hedonistic egoism that any true conservative finds repulsive. And while she also picks up on certain elements of Adam Smith’s capitalism and Aristotelian rationalism, those elements are thoroughly contaminated by the vile LEFTWING elements of her thought.

    There are a few self-professing “right wingers” out there who love Ayn Rand, I know. And you can throw Rand in THEIR faces and see how they respond. But you clearly have no right to throw her in mind. Because I reject her philosophy and openly did so a long time ago.

    So, as you said, “Nice try.

    Thanx fer playin’.”

    Too bad you suck at your own game.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: