Schumer, Democrats Goose-Stepping To Their Fuhrers’ Marching Orders

When Charles Schumer’s caucus gives marching orders, Charles Schumer knows exactly how to proceed: “Jawohl, mein Fuhrer!”

Even the New York Times of all sources affirms this was  an incredibly stupid display.  But it is an incredibly stupid act that reveals that the Democrats are strickly a Big Brother-style operation.  And that Republicans are their Immanuel Goldstein.

March 29, 2011, 12:30 pm
On a Senate Call, a Glimpse of Marching Orders
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER
4:58 p.m. | Updated Um, senators, ever heard of the mute button?

Moments before a conference call with reporters was scheduled to get underway on Tuesday morning, Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate, apparently unaware that many of the reporters were already on the line, began to instruct his fellow senators on how to talk to reporters about the contentious budget process.

After thanking his colleagues — Barbara Boxer of California, Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland, Thomas R. Carper of Delaware and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut — for doing the budget bidding for the Senate Democrats, who are facing off against the House Republicans over how to cut spending for the rest of the fiscal year, Mr. Schumer told them to portray John A. Boehner of Ohio, the speaker of the House, as painted into a box by the Tea Party, and to decry the spending cuts that he wants as extreme. “I always use the word extreme,” Mr. Schumer said. “That is what the caucus instructed me to use this week.”

A minute or two into the talking-points tutorial, though, someone apparently figured out that reporters were listening, and silence fell.
Then the conference call began in earnest, with the Democrats right on message.

“We are urging Mr. Boehner to abandon the extreme right wing,” said Ms. Boxer, urging the House to compromise on the scale of spending cuts and to drop proposed amendments that would deny federal financing for Planned Parenthood and for government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency.

Mr. Carper continued with the theme, referring to some House Republicans’ “right-wing extremist friends.” Mr. Cardin decried Mr. Boehner’s giving into “extremes of his party.” Mr. Blumenthal closed by speaking of the “relatively small extreme group of ideologues” who are “an anchor” dragging down the budget negotiation process.

How news is made . . .

Update: Later in the day, Mr. Schumer’s spokesman, Brian Fallon, issued this statement about the senator’s remarks: “There’s nothing wrong with reporters overhearing him calling the House Republicans’ [position] extreme, because that’s what it is. He had just given a speech on the Senate floor saying the same thing. The sooner Speaker Boehner abandons the Tea Party’s extreme demands, the sooner there can be a bipartisan deal on the budget.”

So’kay, Republicans are “extreme right wing.”  But you guys are nothing more than a bunch of Nazis, goose stepping to your fuhrers’ marching orders.

The “relatively small extreme group of ideologues” just won the largest landslide election in 70 years, while Democrats – the “mainstream” in their warped view – just LOST the largest landslide election in 70 years.  What is wrong with this picture?

The Republican House is trying to fulfill the campaign pledge that won them victory in that landslide.  The are trying to cut a MERE $61 billion out of a $1.65 TRILLION deficit.  Democrats falsely and deceitfully claim they want to reduce the deficit when literally everything the Republicans propose to do so is “extremist.”

Let’s talk “extremist”:  When Democrats took over, Republicans had left them with a deficit of $161 billion (the deficit in the Republican-passed FY-2007 Budget).  The very next budget, and the first budget passed by Democrats (FY-2008), contained a $459 billion deficit – nearly three times larger than the previous year’s GOP budget.  If that seems crazy, consider their next budget, the FY-2009 budget that had a $1.4 TRILLION deficit – which again virtually tripled their previous tripling of the deficit.  Then there was the Democrats’ FY-2010 budget with a deficit of $1.6 trillion.  And even with total control over the White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate, Democrats – caught like cockroaches with the kitchen lights turned on – couldn’t pass a budget at all prior to the election that threw them out of that total control.

Thanks to the Democrats, the United States is adding $4 billion to the deficit every single day this year. 

Now, you need to decide that either THAT is “extreme,” or Republicans trying to cut just a tiny fraction – just 1.5% – of that deficit, is “extremist.”

Republicans are the extremists?  Again, what is wrong with this picture???

Let us see who has used this tactic of unrelenting blame in the past:

Hitler wrote his Mein Kampf.  He blamed the Jews for pretty much everything that was wrong with Germany.

Hitler seized power after blaming the Reichstag fire on a communist conspiracy.

Hitler launched his Anschluss in Austria claiming that he was “protecting” the Austrian people from a Communist uprising (i.e., he blamed the communists).  For the record, both Nazi fascism and Soviet communism were both socialist and both left wing (“Nazi” stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party”).  The Nazis were “rightwing” only in that they were the far right of the extreme left.

Hitler demanded the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia after blaming the Czechs for oppressing the Volkdeutsch (ethnic Germans) there.

Hitler invaded Poland after fabricating the Gleiwitz incident which provided him with the pretext to blame the Poles.

The tactic of demagogic blame has worked for fascist socialists many times before.  Only an evil people falls for this tactic.

It remains to be seen whether it will work this time.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Schumer, Democrats Goose-Stepping To Their Fuhrers’ Marching Orders”

  1. HL Says:

    Hi Michael. I’m reading Eric Metaxas’ book. ‘Bonhoffer- Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy.’ I wanted to recommend it to you and your readers. It is confirming and sobering to read what a fellow believer lived through and eventually died for. in circumstances that eerily relate to today. A Church and country that for the most part could not or would not discern the evil that was at work through Hitler and the Nazi’s, stand up and resist them with the truth. Though Bonhoffer had a more influential calling and platform as a pastor and teacher, I can so relate to his frustration with professing Christians and Germans who refused to listen to the truth.
    Just like today, the truth was available for anyone who was willing to see reality as it is, not what one wants it to be.

    Keep up the GREAT work.

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    Thanks, HL. And thanks for the recommend.

    Bonhoeffer was/is a true hero of the faith. At the same time, he exposed a culture that at once was “Christian” and the most “modern” and “scientific.”

    In reality, Germany’s Christianity was a hollow, rotton shell. Liberalism (by which I mean theological liberalism) had rotted the Germany that had produced Martin Luther to the very core:

    Theological liberalism was the backdoor by which secular fads, follies and prejudices entered Christian doctrine. Writes Steigmann-Gall: “Not only did racialist anti-Semitism find a warmer reception among liberal Protestants than among confessional Lutherans, in many ways racialist anti-Semitism was born of the theological crisis that liberal Protestantism represented.”

    Here’s one article on “Nazi Christianity” that points out what an oxymoron the phrase truly is.

    Hitler openly mocked Martin Luther. Luther’s greatest work was “The Bondage of the Will.” Luther’s point was that our will’s are fallen; we are sinners who cannot choose rightly apart from God in Christ. Hitler turned that on its head. His “contribution” was “The Triumph of the Will.”

    Only fools cannot understand that Hitler was not only not “Christian,” but that he was a true antichrist. On the Christian – and more specifically the JUDEO-Christian – worldview, the human will is evil, in bondage to sin. On Hitler’s view – and on the view of modern liberalism – the human will is the most wonderful thing there is. Liberals view Hitler as a “Christian” only because they are true sons of hell themselves.

    Bonhoeffer understood that. He also understood the depravity – “the bondage of the will” – that had come to truly seize German culture. Nazi Germany represented the most modern and scientific culture of its day. But it was a culture without Christ; a culture that purged Christ and replaced it with socialism in which the government becomes God. And as a result they became the worst kind of sophisticated barbarians who took barbarism to an entirely new level.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: