Liberals: ‘It’s Okay To Burn The Bible, Just PLEASE Don’t Burn The Holy Koran’

This is just another example of the breathtaking liberal ignorance and moral stupidity of the mainstream media.

We’ve got Time Magazine world editor Bobby Ghosh explaining on MSNBC’s “Hardball” that burning a copy of the Qur’an was “much more inflammatory than burning a Bible” because of the greater spiritual significance of the Qur’an.

Here is a transcript via Mediaite:

GHOSH: The thing to keep in mind that`s very important here is that the Koran to Muslims, it is not — it is not the same as the Bible to Christians.

The Bible is a book written by men. It is acknowledged by Christians that it is written by men. It`s the story of Jesus.

TODD: Yes.

GHOSH: But the Koran, if you are a believer, if you`re a Muslim, the Koran is directly the word of God, not written by man. It is transcribed, is directly the word of God.

That makes it sacred in a way that it`s hard to understand if you`re not Muslim. So the act of burning a Koran is much more — potentially much, much more inflammatory than –

TODD: Directly attacking — directly attacking God.

GHOSH: — than if you were to burn a — burn a Bible.

TODD: Directly attacking God.

If you buy Time Magazine, allow me to correctly label you a DUMBASS.  You’ve got the international editor of Time ignorantly claiming that Christians don’t believe the Bible is “the Word of God,” and you’ve got the MSNBC host first agreeing with him that the Bible is just a book written by men and then trying to help Ghosh make his point by repeatedly saying “Directly attacking God” like some kind of particularly idiotic jihadist-trained parrot.

Muslims do not claim that God wrote the Qur’an and handed it to Mohammed.  Rather, they claim that a human being wrote it under an angel named Gabriel’s direction.

Here are a number of passages – and hardly an exhaustive list by any means – about the Bible:

‘Thy word I have treasured in my heart that I might not sin against Thee’ (Psalm 119:11)

‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God’ (Math 4:4).

“The word of God is alive and powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword…” (Heb 4:12).

“So will My word be which goes forth from My mouth; It will not return to Me empty, Without accomplishing what I desire, And without succeeding in the matter for which I sent it.” (Isaiah 55:11).

“For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God” (1 Pet 1:23).

“And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God” (Ephesians 6:17). 

‘All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work’ (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

I want you to carefully note that NONE of these passages is speaking about Allah or the Qur’an.  In fact, neither existed yet.  Muhammad had not yet been born to invent him and pirate Judaism and Christianity to fabricate his own religion.  And the doctrine of the inspiration of the Holy Bible is merely one of the things that Muhammad pirated.  In addition to Abraham and Jesus, Muhammad frankly even pirated the angel Gabriel whom he claimed dictated the Qur’an to him (Daniel 8:16; 9:21; Luke 1:11–19).  They ALL came from the HOLY Bible long before they had anything to do with the Qur’an.

I would submit that, given that the Qur’an plagiarized large portions of the Bible, whereas the writers of the Bible – both the human and the ultimate Divine behind their writings – would regard the Qur’an as incoherent rubbish, it should be rather obvious which of the two is truly “holy” and which is not.

I’ve read the Qu’ran.  It is virtual gibberish.  I couldn’t agree more with Robert Spencer in his description of the Qur’an in The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion:

“reading the Qur’an is in many places like walking in on a conversation between two people with whom one is only slightly acquainted.  When Islamic apologists say terrorists quote the Qur’an on jihad ‘out of context,’ they neglect to mention that the Qur’an itself often offers little context.  Frequently it makes reference to people and events without  bothering to explain what’s going on” (p. 20-21).

And Spencer proceeds to offer an example which proves just how muddy and indecipherable the Qur’an truly is.  Without a vast collection of volumes of very human Islamic tradition called the Haddith, nobody would have any idea of what is being said about what.

The Bible, by contrast, stands on its own.  And the best interpreter of the Bible is the Bible.  Commentaries are certainly useful for helping one understand a few passages here or there.  But with the Qur’an, they are utterly essential for having so much as the vaguest clue.

Do you ever notice how often mainstream media “journalists” who would NEVER refer to the “holy” Bible due to their “journalistic objectivity” invariably bow and scrape before Muslims lest they be murdered for failing to say “the holy Qur’an”???

Is it merely fear, or is it that journalists – who are far more atheist than the general population – agreeing with the most fanatic jihadist Muslims that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”  With said common enemy being Judeo-Christianity???

Then there’s the manner in which these “journalists” have tried to create the perception that a crackpot preacher of a tiny church is more guilty of murder than the intolerant religion of hate that just racked up another 21 innocent murder victims.

I mean, who doesn’t go attack a U.N. compound and murder people who had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the thing you claim to be angry about, anyway?

Let me further ridicule the ignorant Time Magazine international editor who stupidly said that Christians don’t mind Bible burning as much because, after all, we don’t think the Bible is God’s book.  How about Jesus versus Muhammad?  Christians don’t just rightly call Jesus “the Word” (John 1:1-3), but they believe Him to be the Son of God, who assumed a human nature to free us from sin and death.  Do Muslims regard Muhammad as God?  As far as I know, they don’t.  And yet guess who didn’t turn into a murderous mob when their God was placed in a jar of urine and called “art” by secular humanist liberals???  If you guessed the same Christians who don’t erupt into a murderous frenzy whenever someone burns a Bible, you win a prize!!!

In other words, the problem isn’t so much that some nutjob burned a Qur’an; the real problem is that Muslims are murderers who can’t control their demonic urge to murder at any provocation.

Some liberals are so completely morally stupid that they think we should turn our backs with a wink and a nod while 1.6 billion Muslims annihilate Israel.  What they stupidly refuse to understand is that Israel is only the “LITTLE” Satan; America is the GREAT Satan.  We’ll have to go too.  Oh, and England will have to go.  And France.  And pretty much all of Western Europe.  And if it’s okay, anyone who doesn’t bow down and confess that Allah is greater, and Muhammad is his prophet.

As Spencer pounts out, Islam is a truly intolerant and violent religion.  Don’t burn our Qur’ans or we’ll riot and murder.  Don’t draw cartoons or we’ll riot and murderDon’t send female journalists to report the news or we’ll gang-rape and riot and murder.  Or at least beat the women with clubs.  And, of course, don’t oppose Islam or we’ll murder your women and children.  It is frankly amazing how “journalists” who claim to stand for free spech and free expression will so willingly if not eagerly censor themselves in the face of fundamentalist Islamic intolerance while so “courageously” attacking peaceful Christians and the Judeo-Christian worldview that made free speech and freedom of expression possible in the first place.

If you’re reading Time Magazine or watching MSNBC, you are trusting abject moral morons to inform you about the world.  And it’s frankly little wonder you’re so pathetically ignorant.

Finally, there’s Barack Hussein.  He falsely claims that he’s a Christian, but the man who routinely refers to “the holy Koran” has never once used the phrase “the Holy Bible” and has in fact even mocked the Bible in a way that he would never dare do to the Qur’an.

Men like Barack Obama and Bobby Ghosh are cowards and weasels.  And it’s long past time to expose them as such.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “Liberals: ‘It’s Okay To Burn The Bible, Just PLEASE Don’t Burn The Holy Koran’”

  1. HL Says:

    And expose the weasels you did…….in spades! I was very grateful to hear Rush address this on his program yesterday.

    You know Michael, one of these days, these lying weasels are going to come face to face with He who is the Truth and gave us His Holy Word…. aka The Holy Bible.

  2. Joey Says:

    I couldn’t have said it better myself. Remember when Pope Benidict simply quoted “Show me the Koran and I will show you murder and plunder” (something to that effect). And they went crazy. Idiots all of them. The difference is God, The God, Our God is patient and kind and loving and for their sake they should thank him. Cause Allah is nothing nor is Mohammid. Mohammad just got lucky with a bunch of idiots that obviously didn’t make it to the holy land. Mohammad had to justify Jesus Christ in his teachings because he couldnt do miracles. so he justified that by saying i don’t have to. Morans all muslims i don’t care how peacefull they are and you right in saying, OBAMA and ALL YOU LIBRAL JOURNALIST are cowards. Take a stand.
    Question of those innocent people that were killed because some guy half way around the world did something to something that is a cheap knock off from the real HOLY BIBLE. How many of those were their own people? IDIOTS.

  3. Michael Eden Says:

    That’s the bottom line, HL.

    David asked, “Why do the wicked prosper?” Job asked “Why do the righteous suffer?”

    The bottom line is that this earth is not fair. Liberals who demand it be fair are self-centered people who demand that it be fair to THEM and to THEIR SPECIAL INTERESTS but profoundly unfair to everyone else (you know, the people whose wealth gets “redistributed”; the people who DON’T get the job even though they are more qualified because they’ve got the wrong skin color; the people who oppose abortion and homosexuality being shoved down their throats because they believe in a God who is far wiser than the fool judge who is imposing these things by unconstitutional usurpation of their roles).

    But one day God will balance the scales.

    We were made for justice. We were created in the image of a just God, and so we look for justice even though we rarely find it in the world around us.

    I don’t have to take vengeance; God Himself will do that to these vile people.

    One day they will stand before a just and holy – and very outraged God – and explain why they felt free to murder 53 million innocent human beings. And God will do some “redistribution” of His own; for those babies will get the lives that were robbed them in heaven; and the murderers who sacrificed those precious lives on the alter of personal convenience will get the eternal destruction they earned for themselves.

  4. Jim Says:

    great article

    re libya – interesting muslims killing each other is aka a civil war is something we get involved as a “humanitarian” mission if you will (didnt obama say several years ago we should NOT get involved in civil wars?)… but in darfar muslims in the north slaughtering christians in the south we fail to even mention.

    obivously i only advocate for a foreign policy that serves our national interest.

  5. Michael Eden Says:

    Thank you, Jim.

    The moral hypocrisy of Obama is truly stunning. In previous speeches demonized Bush and demonized any combat mission re: humanitarian grounds.

    Those speeches are very much worth revisiting.

    State Senator Obama said on Oct. 2, 2002, that he isn’t “opposed to all war,” only “dumb war, rash war.”

    Substitute Gadhafi and Libya for Saddam Hussein and Iraq in this excerpt from that speech: “I suffer no illusions about (Moammar Gadhafi). He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions. … He’s a bad guy. The world and the (Libyan) people would be better off without him.”

    Here is Obama in 2002, with his ultimate argument against the Iraq war. Again I substitute Libya for Iraq and Gadhafi for Hussein: “(Gadhafi) poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors … the (Libyan) economy is in shambles … the (Libyan) military (is) a fraction of its former strength and … in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.”

    We should impeach Obama. And the star witness demanding that Barack Obama be impeached would be Barack Obama.

    And on the Darfur area you are right again. As long as it’s Christians being massacred by Muslims (which Saddam Hussein and then al Qaeda in Iraq also did), Obama seems fine with it.

    There is no consistency to his foreign policy at all. Saudi Arabia is now terrified and more hostile to the U.S. than it has ever been because they understand that Obama will not stand with them if the terrorists stir up a “popular revolt” there, as the Muslim Brotherhood did in Eqpt with another key American ally named Mubarak. It’s like Mr. Toad’s wild ride.

  6. stephen Says:

    “Finally, there’s Barack Hussein. He falsely claims that he’s a Christian, but the man who routinely refers to “the holy Koran” has never once used the phrase “the Holy Bible” and has in fact even mocked the Bible in a way that he would never dare do to the Qur’an.”

    How can you possibly know that Obama never, not one time, used the phrase the Holy Bible? As Christians we are forbidden to bear false witness.
    FYI it was during the Bush administration that the Army burned bibles not Obama. Perhaps Bush is a “false” Christian as well.
    As for a hate filled religion I recommend to anyone seeking the truth to read Martin Luther “The Jews and their lies”. Published in Germany prior to WWII. There is a man that had a hate issue and who nonetheless is called the founder of protestantism. A summary if his belief is that Jews are evil, should have their property stripped from them and be forced to do heavy manual labor. You really must read the book to get the full effect. Not saying Islam does not promote violence, obviously it can but some bloody acts have been perpetrated in the name of Christ. ie Popes claiming any soldier killed in a ‘Holy Crusade’ would go to heaven. Sound familiar?

  7. Michael Eden Says:

    Stephen,

    You are reading far more into “has never once used the phrase” than I ever intended.

    I am clearly contrasting Obama’s repeated PUBLIC statements with his LACK of such public statements about the Bible. I do NOT simply assert “Obama has never once used the phrase ‘the Holy Bible’,” which would make your point legitimate. I say, “but the man who routinely refers to ‘the holy Koran’ has never done the same thing with the Bible.”

    So why are YOU bearing false witness about me???

    Next this thing about Bush burning Bibles. I have no idea what you’re talking about, but for the sake of argument (rather than waste my time researching) will grant that some kind of Bible burning incident happened sometime during the Bush years.

    Here’s a newsflash: in the true religion of Christianity, Bibles are the Word of God, which we should treasure in our hearts and our minds. But the Bible I hold in my hand and carry around is just a book, made of paper (and if I’m extravant leather). Unlike Muslims, I don’t need to go on a jihad because somebody somewhere burned a Bible. I would also point out that if a flag touches the ground it is supposed to be burned. It is NOT an act of disrespect to burn that flag. And so it is not necessarily an act of disrespect to burn a Bible, either. So this thing about dragging George Bush into this – aside being a red herring – just kind of shows you have no ability whatsoever to grant a point no matter how valid it is.

    But you’re not through dragging extraneous garbage into a debate about liberals fawning all over the Koran, are you? You drag in Martin Luther (and for the record, I’m NOT a Lutheran) into this discussion. Just how on earth would a fair-minded person say that whatever Martin Luther did 500 years ago in Germany give liberals in America the right to fawn over the Koran and Islam while being hostile to the Bible and Christianity???

    This post wasn’t about Islam; this post was about stupid hypocrite liberals who have a fundamental bias against Christianity and the Bible and then prostrate themselves before Islam in the name of political correctness.

    For the record, I am a pre-millennial dispensationalist. I believe that God has a plan for Israel, and that one day soon during the coming tribulation Israel will look upon Messiah and mourn as for an only Son because Messiah came and they rejected Him (Zechariah 12:10). And I believe that when Paul said “all Israel will be saved” in Romans 11, I believe with all my heart that it will literally be ISRAEL. Far too many Christians have a terribly flawed view of Israel, and both their terribly flawed belief and the actions that follow from that terribly flawed belief are reprehensible and even evil. I don’t have to justify Martin Luther. I probably have more and better grounds to condemn his attitudes than YOU do.

    Lastly, your final words expressing your moral equivalence are despicable. Did people do terrible things and wrongly claim they were doing them as Christians a thousand years ago during the Crusades? Yes. And that makes what the Muslism are doing TODAY somehow legitimate? Seriously? What you are saying is that if somebody did something a long time ago and then repented and acknoweledged it to be wrong and stopped doing it (Christians), that that is no different than continuing to do that thing going on a thousand years later and glorifying in it (Muslims). On your reprehensible view, the fact that I stole a candy bar as a child, but have never stolen a single thing since, makes me no different from someone who has stolen hundreds of thousands of dollars of stuff from people all his life and continues to steal. So I guess either I should go to prison for life or we should refuse to hold the lifelong practicing thief accountable.

    I hate arguing with moral idiots.

  8. Emily Says:

    Um. But it is historical fact that the Bible was not only transcribed, but in fact WRITTEN by man. (I.e. Chapters of Mathew, Mark, Like and John)? And it’s pretty funny that you take the word of the pope as ultimate fact. It’s not like he’s biased or anything. As far as pirating religions. Are we going to talk about how the Church of England is considered okay just because king Henry VIII wanted to divorce his wife for not bearing him a son? I’m not saying either should be burned because honestly, the whole thing is stupid and childish. And Obama the weasel? Oh my gosh! He’s never said the words “the holy bible” (And yes. Lowercase bible.) In public, what do we do? You know why he said the “Holy Koran”? Because that’s the title. Whereas its very commonly accepted to refer to it as simply the Bible. Not to mention hes trying to show RESPECT (something you very obviously know little about) in public relations. How about we don’t start some more holy wars, guys.

  9. Emily Says:

    Ha.”I hate arguing with moral idiots.” My thoughts exactly.

  10. Emily Says:

    Sorry, one more thing. You say you’ve read the Koran. You’ve said its plagerized from the Bible. Then you say it’s gibberish. Jesus Christ of fucking Nazareth guys, pull yourself together. Is it really necessary at ALL to simply spread you’re OWN doctorine of hate and intolerance, or do only the Muslims do that?

  11. Michael Eden Says:

    Emily,

    The first thing I want to point out is your spirit of hypocrite liar that you simply IGNORE the FACT that Obama is treasonously playing religious favorites by favoring a murderous, theocratic tyrannical religious system of Islam over the religion of Christianity that our founding fathers held and which has characterized our nation until this very day.

    My title and the point of my article is clear: Liberals: ‘It’s Okay To Burn The Bible, Just PLEASE Don’t Burn The Holy Koran’

    You don’t have the courage or the intelligence to deal with that documented FACT that we’re actively persecuting Christians and Christianity and the Christian Bible, but treating the terrorist religion of Islam and the Koran with kid gloves. You can’t even TOUCH the REASON I wrote this article and the thesis that I documented.

    The second thing I want to point out is that you simply factually LIE. You say:

    And it’s pretty funny that you take the word of the pope as ultimate fact. It’s not like he’s biased or anything.

    Lady, I don’t even MENTION the pope. Nor am I a Catholic. I DENY the Catholic claim that the pope is “the vicar of Christ” or is in any way, shape or form infallible. You simply dihonestly manufacture something that is completely false to slander me with and falsely appear to refute something I don’t actually even say or believe. And that is a horrible characteristic of you leftist haters of truth.

    If I were a dishonest slanderer like you, I would simply rightly conclude, “the fact that you refuse to deal with ANY of my actual points certainly gives me the right to refuse to deal with any of your claims.”

    Sadly, I suppose, I’m nothing like the intolerant bigot that you are. I actually have the intellectual and moral courage to interact with other people’s ideas. Too bad you proved you don’t have that. Because what you say in your 1:15 AM post (which are too evil for me to quote) as you got more and more rabid and evil leaves me no choice but to block you. You are the worst kind of hater there is for using those words to revile my Christ and I will be done with you after I refute your words here.

    You begin what turns into a rabid and demonic rant against Jesus where you describe Him with the F-word by saying the following:

    Um. But it is historical fact that the Bible was not only transcribed, but in fact WRITTEN by man

    Yes, the Word of the LORD came to His prophets, who were human. Just one verse is enough to point out that very simple and biblically-acknowledged fact:

    Surely the Lord GOD does nothing Unless He reveals His secret counsel To His servants the prophets. — Amos 3:7

    The problem is that you ignorantly believe that if man had any part in writing the Bible, that it can’t be the Word of God. And that is because as a militant atheist your brain is simply too insect-tiny to have a Creator God in it who created man in His own image so He could reach out to man and speak through man and – in the Incarnation – actually take the image of man that HE had created in HIS image and become a man Himself.

    So here’s another Scripture that points out the human-cooperation in God’s inspired Word:

    for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God. — 1 Peter 1:21

    Here’s another powerful passage describing the Incarnational spirit of the Bible:

    For we were not making up clever stories when we told you about the powerful coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. We saw his majestic splendor with our own eyes when he received honor and glory from God the Father. The voice from the majestic glory of God said to him, “This is my dearly loved Son, who brings me great joy.” We ourselves heard that voice from heaven when we were with him on the holy mountain.

    Because of that experience, we have even greater confidence in the message proclaimed by the prophets. You must pay close attention to what they wrote, for their words are like a lamp shining in a dark place—until the Day dawns, and Christ the Morning Star shines in your hearts. — 2 Peter 1:16-19

    What Peter is saying is that he and his fellow apostles didn’t make anything up; they were THERE to SEE as EYEWITNESSES. They literally had GOD physically WITH them to guide their understandings so they could understand and thus reveal the truth. And Peter realizes that ALL Scripture – EVERY SINGLE WORD IN THE BIBLE – is the same way. It is the Word of the Living God revealed through the capstone of God’s creation, through beings created in God’s image so they could reflect God’s glory by sharing in God’s Spirit of Truth.

    Your narrow-minded view that if man wrote the words, that therefore God could not have had anything whatsoever to do with is, is abject idiocy. There is a reason the Word of God has stood for MILLENNIA, where as you offer only the words of another trite fool.

    The terrorist religion of Islam has NOTHING like this. There IS no “imago Dei” in Islam. In fact the very notion that there COULD be such a thing is BLASPHEMY in Islam. Islam demands that mankind be as NOTHING so that it can be trampled upon BY men in Allah’s wicked name. Which is why Islam is so much like the Stalinism that leftists like YOU desire: the “Word” is DICTATED to man. By an oppressive totalitarian system. Because the ONLY worldview in the history of the world more murderous than the worldview of Islam is the worldview of SOCIALISM that has murdered more than 100 million of its own people just in peacetime ALONE: https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM

    We Christians believe that God created us as responsible individual beings in His image and that He holds us responsible for our actions. Versus leftists and radical Muslims who view individual man as either like ants or as mindless herd animals who are to be led by the nose by our superiors whether it be superiors under Allah or superiors in the doctrines of Marx. The God of the Bible created man and woman in His image. Which is why the Islam the terrorists impose is the same sort of totalitarian government YOU and your fellow Stalinist thugs constantly try to impose.

    Christians do NOT claim that God dictated the Bible to His prophets the way the totalitarian theocratic religion that YOU defend here – because if you understand the point of my article that is precisely what you are doing, defending Obama’s right to uphold the Koran while denying Christians’ right to uphold the Bible – claim about their Allah and their Koran:

    The Quran (/kɔrˈɑːn/[n 1] kor-AHN; Arabic: القرآن‎ al-qur’ān,[n 2] literally meaning “the recitation”; also romanized Qurʾan or Koran) is the central religious text of Islam, which Muslims believe to be a revelation from God (Arabic: الله‎, Allah).[1] Its scriptural status among a world-spanning religious community, and its major place within world literature generally, have led to a great deal of secondary literature on the Quran.[2] Quranic chapters are called suras and verses, ayahs.

    Muslims believe the Quran was verbally revealed by God to Muhammad through the angel Gabriel (Jibril),[3][4] gradually over a period of approximately 23 years, beginning on 22 December 609 CE,[5] when Muhammad was 40, and concluding in 632, the year of his death.[1][6][7] Muslims regard the Quran as the most important miracle of Muhammad, a proof of his prophethood,[8] and the culmination of a series of divine messages that started with the messages revealed to Adam and ended with Muhammad.

    So you slander me by associating me with Islam and Muslims. While saying that only Islam could be true because unlike Christianity IT dictates the exact same way liberals love it when omnipotent power dictates and oppresses.

    It’s actually rather funny to me that the ONLY form of revelation that YOU are willing to accept is that of the vicious religion of hate and violence that is Islam. YOU have to have a rabid totalitarian religion that dictates and imposes that comes from a God who “dictates” His Word. Otherwise you hate it. Which is why you hate the God of the Bible so much. Because He’s not a rabid hater like YOU.

    It’s like I’ve always said: at the core, there is NO DIFFERENCE between a leftist like you and a rabid Muslim. You BOTH want the SAME thing: a totalitarian system that is dictated to and imposed on herd animal worshipers of big government.

    The God of the Bible is very different from the rabid, totalitarian dictator – LITERALLY – God that you don’t mind being imposed on mankind in many ways. But it all comes out in this very thing that you demonize: God didn’t “dictate” His Word in the Bible; He relied on the humanity of His prophets and shaped their lives and their experiences so that they would say His Word precisely as He intended.

    Here’s an article on it: http://www.signstimes.com/?p=article&a=40030805929.786

    Here’s another: http://mindrenewers.com/2011/12/03/the-scriptures-moved-by-the-spirit-summary/

    It is frankly a shame that someone so ignorant and obviously uninformed as you has her mind so made up. But you clearly understand NOTHING whatsoever about the Christian doctrine of divine inspiration. Not that such ignorance stops you from mocking what you are so ignorant of, mind you.

    Ultimately, I believe the inspiration of the Bible because of the following NON-circular logic:

    Jesus proved He was the Son of God by means of the HISTORIC FACT of His death and His Resurrection from the dead. The Empty Tomb is EMPTY – unlike the tomb of YOUR Mohammad and his dictation and his dictatorship that resulted from his dictation. And we can further know that Jesus’ Resurrection from the dead that confirmed Who He IS is a historic fact because of the transformed lives of His disciples from cowardly men who ran and hid to bold proclaimers who preached and DIED as martyrs. EVERY SINGLE ONE of Jesus’ disciples save St. John are historically proven to have died as martyrs proclaiming Jesus and His Resurrection. The disciples were in a UNIQUE position to know for a FACT whether Jesus truly rose from the dead or not: they SAW Him. They TALKED to Him. They TOUCHED Him. And it is only because they knew for a FACT that Jesus rose from the dead that they followed Him and died for Him themselves.

    St. Paul pointed out that there were 500 witnesses who had seen Jesus alive following His death and Resurrection in the creed of 1 Corinthians 15. Paul recites a creed that he himself did not write and he points out that HE RECEIVED IT:

    https://carm.org/questions/about-jesus/1-cor-153-4-demonstrates-creed-too-early-legend-corrupt

    https://carm.org/analysis-pre-pauline-creed-1-corinthians-151-11

    The point is that Jesus proved Who He was and IS by rising from the dead. You try dying and then raising from the dead and I’ll buy your message.

    Jesus CONFIRMED every word of the Old Testament. In fact Jesus confirmed ALL the most controversial things about the Old Testament: Jesus conformed the existence of Adam and Eve; He confirmed Noah and the Flood; you name it, if it was controversial, Jesus confirmed it. And Jesus CONFIRMED the authors of the New Testament. He chose them and commissioned them to carry His message.

    The EXACT same message that I believe and carry to this day. Because we can know for a fact that the Bible is EXACTLY as it was handed to us in antiquity. We have the manuscript evidence to prove that.

    You proceed to talk about stuff that frankly not only doesn’t have a DAMN thing to do about the FACT that I document – namely that Obama is allowing the Koran while he persecutes the Bible – but has nothing to do with your own bogus claim that somehow the Bible shouldn’t be believed.

    You sit there and say of the pope that you falsely slander me as following and say, “It’s not like he’s biased or anything.” WHEN YOU YOURSELF ARE LITERALLY AS BIASED AS HELL. And proceed to prove it when you slander Jesus with the f-word that is your soul.

    You HYPOCRITE OF THE VERY LOWEST AND WORST SORT.

    What does the Church of England or Henry the VIII have to do with the Bible that was written and canonized CENTURIES before???? If the Bible IS the Word of God – as Jesus’ Resurrection from the dead PROVES – then in what way did Henry VIII travel back into time and destroy the truth of something that was established centuries before he was even BORN????

    You can go now.

  12. Michael Eden Says:

    For the record, this is why blocked Emily.

    This isn’t “argument.” This is a rabid hater who has the same demonic spirit of the “artist” that placed a crucifix into a jar and then filled it with his urine.

    There is no discussion with a demon-possessed, slandering spirit of hate.

    It’s almost comical that Emily began her rant with “it’s not like he’s biased or anything.” When Emily WORSHIPS bigotry and bias.

    Whenever I block somebody, I take great pains to show that person up for the lying moral idiot that they are.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: