Obama’s mouthpieces are warning Congress not to send “mixed messages” over Libya:
White House press secretary Jay Carney said that the more than 30-page report and analysis will be sent to Congress Wednesday afternoon.
Carney also issued a warning, saying it is “important for Congress not to send mixed signals about a goal… we all share.”
The problem is that Obama is a liar, a demagogue and a hypocrite without shame.
Even DEMOCRATS are now beyond pissed with Obama’s lies and deceit:
Representative Lynn Woolsey charged the President of showing “contempt” for the Constitution, and insulting the intelligence of the American people. Woolsey made the following statement: “The Obama Administration’s argument is one that shows contempt for the Constitution and for the executive’s co-equal branch of government, the United States Congress. To say that our aggressive bombing of Libya does not rise to the level of ‘hostilities’ flies in the face of common sense and is an insult to the intelligence of the American people. This act must not stand, because we can’t afford another full-blown war—the ones we’re already fighting are bankrupting us morally and fiscally. Let those who support the military campaign against Libya make their case, in an open debate culminating with a vote in the U.S. Congress. The American people deserve nothing less.”
Of course, if Democrats actually believed the stuff they’re saying, they would impeach Obama and vote him right out on his butt.
But let’s spend a little time on the profound hypocrisy that characterizes Barry Hussein.
This was our Hypocrite-in-Chief when he didn’t give a rat’s ass about sending “mixed messages” when he condemned Bush for Iraq:
“The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation,” Obama responded.
I’m sure that Libyans parachuted into your neighborhood just like they did in mine. We’ve got the whole “Red Dawn” thing playing out here, only its Libyan paratroopers invading us instead of Russians. I’m actually typing this in the hills as I partiicpate in the heroic resistance being led by our brilliant president Barry Hussein. Either that, or Obama is so full of fecal matter that he could fertilize Brazil all by himself.
It also didn’t matter if President Bush had Congressional approval for that war. Obama doesn’t give a DAMN about the Constitution OR Congress.
Obama also didn’t have a problem undermining President Bush or sending plenty of “mixed messages” when he said about Afghanistan:
“We’ve got to get the job done there and that requires us to have enough troops so that we’re not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous pressure over there.”
And of course he was doing everything he could to send mixed messages and undermine the Iraq War when he said things like:
“I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there. In fact, I think it will do the reverse.”
Obviously he was 100% wrong about the surge strategy that turned the Iraq War around. But why should a lying weasel like Obama worry about being right, or worry about being a hypocrite???
And Obama also said things like –
“Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world”
– to send mixed messages galore. Again, he couldn’t have been more wrong. Which is why this loathsome weasel later tried to take credit through his vice president for what he had spent all his time undermining and condemning:
This little weasel is not only still in Iraq and Afghanistan after running as the fraud who would messianically end all our wars and bring our troops home; he is now in FIVE wars, having added Libya, Pakistan and Yemen to his total.
Because Obama is the kind of fool who thinks he can eat his cake and have it too – with the full cooperation of a mainstream media that might as well be under Goebbel’s Ministry of Propaganda to keep us distracted while he does it.
Obama is ignoring the War Powers Act which was PASSED BY DEMOCRATS IN 1973 to restrain Nixon’s adventurism. He is a fascist who doesn’t give a damn about our Constitution or our laws as he “fundamentally transforms” America into something it never has been and never should become.
Obama’s dishonest argument is that he doesn’t have to give Congress a voice because he already surrendered American sovereingty to NATO. Not only was that utterly depraved to begin with, but it is also cynical and dishonest: because NATO is merely the politically correct version of American military power.
In his speech, Defense Secretary Gates excoriated NATO as a hollow sham. It’s not Europe leading while America supports in Libya, because Europe is too cowardly, weak and weaselly to take responsibility for anything under the sun. Just like Obama himself. Defense Secretary Gates pointed out that without MASSIVE US involvement, NATO not only wouldn’t exist, but can’t even provide the resources for a TINY military campaign. Which is to say that Obama using NATO as a cop-out to dodge the law is about as lame as lame can get.
Pajama’s Media has a nice piece detailing the sheer moral fraud of the Democrat Party. After playing videos of Democrats – including Obama – being treasonous little vermin while Bush was president – they point out:
No, heavens no, they’re whining about Libya, a war they won’t call a war which has nothing to do with our national interests. The Democrats were cool with sending all kinds of mixed signals when we were battling a fierce Islamic insurgency in the heart of the Middle East. But on the fringes, in the NATO kinetic whatever against Daffy the Dictator? You’d better watch what you say.
I’m past sick of this crap.
You want to hear my Middle East policy?
It consists of three parts: 1) We support the only democracy in the history of the entire region as well as the people with whom we share profound moral and spiritual heritage – Israel. Any attack on them is an attack on our vital national security interests. 2) any country we deem a threat to our security will be bombed into the stone age. No “hearts and minds” campaigns, no “nation building,” no aid and most definitely no costly rebuilding campaigns that will drain our treasury and cost our lives. And if they threaten us again, we will come back and bomb the pieces into even smaller pieces. And if they threaten us a third time, we will “fundamentally transform” their country into a lake. And 3) that means YOU, Iran.
Tags: Afghanistan, Congress, Constitution, five wars, hypocrisy, hypocrite, Iran, Iraq, kinetic military action, Libya, Middle East policy, mixed messages, NATO, Obama, Pakistan, Surge, War Powers, Yemen
June 16, 2011 at 3:34 pm
Michael,
Awesome blog, I agree 100%, especially with the last part. I have a small saying that I had inscribed into a license plate frame, “Problem: Middle East, Solution: Parking Lot” Except for Israel of course. Thanks for doing the heavy lifting, keep the daily blogs coming, I look forward to each and every one.
Sincerely,
Jim
June 16, 2011 at 4:44 pm
Jim,
Oh, I sure we could have a giant argument over one detail: should we turn our terrorist-harboring enemies’ countries into “lakes” or “parking lots.” And of course the two rival factions would split into the “lakers” and the “lotters.”
Nah. I’d be just as happy with your parking lot solution.
Thanks for your comment and for your support.
June 17, 2011 at 5:45 am
I agree with your Middle East policy, Michael.
Another great post.
June 17, 2011 at 2:13 pm
The Middle East is only a moral morass if the people formulating Middle East policy themselves live in a state of moral morass.
When George Bush stated that he believed that Muslims should embrace democracy, he failed to understand that democracy is fundamentally antithetical to Islam. And then of course, to the extent that Bush made mistakes, Obama took those mistakes and multiplied them by a factor of 100.
Israel is a democracy because democracy is part of the spirit of the Judeo-Christian tradition.
July 21, 2011 at 1:11 am
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black?
Alledgedly.
July 21, 2011 at 3:08 pm
Albert,
Is your “allegedly” being used the same way the mainstream media keeps using “unexpectedly” to describe each new month of terrible economic news?