‘Republicans Just Want Obama To Lose’ And Other Utterly Stupid Democrat Talking Points

I got a comment to an article on Obama demagoguing taxes that set me off:

Is this really about the rich wanting to keep their $$ or give more? Let’s go back to the Bush/GW era. Not one word about spending or the dollars for 2 wars. I could go on, but this is all about Republicans wanting Obama out. I say give a new Pres 8 yrs in this case to clean up GW and The GOP’s mess. The real problems is congress. Divided and lets never give any Pres, Dem or REP both houses. WE saw what Bush did for 4 yrs. Never forget

My responding tirade:

this is all about Republicans wanting Obama out.”

Chuck,

I’m sorry, but apparently you are a rabidly biased human being who is incapable of comprehending reality and therefore must exist off of leftwing talking points like a catfish feeding off the bottom of the muck in a stagnant pond.

You see, you remember a time when Democrats rallied around Bush and worked to see him reelected. But I happen to live in this place called “the actual world” that you have never seen. I remember things quite differently. I remember eight years of the Bush Derangement Syndrome. I remember how Democrats began demanding that Bush be impeached almost as soon as he took office in 2001. I remember Democrats such as Howard Dean (who became the DNC CHAIRMAN) and Cynthia McKinney accusing President Bush of knowing about the 9/11 attacks in advance and not doing anything.  And that insane group includes more than HALF of ALL Democrats, fwiw.  I remember the mainstream media coverage and the Democrat Party constantly and rabidly hyping Cindy Sheehan who was demonizing George Bush as a murdering warmonger.  I remember when George Bush was trying to reform Social Security in 2005 and the Democrats attacked him with stunning viciousness. I remember when a fellow Democrat asked Rep. Nancy Pelosi when their party would offer its own Social Security plan.  And Pelois’s answer was “Never. Is that soon enough for you?” I remember Democrats literally demonizing Bush for the damned weather during Hurricane Katrina, and calling him a racist who hated black people even though the Democrats at every level from the state Governor down to Mayor Ray Nagin – who let 2,000 school busses that could have saved lives get flooded – were far more to blame for the disaster than Bush was. I remember George Bush trying to get a debt ceiling increase and a Democrat Senator named Barack Hussein Obama decried it a “failure of leadership” while Senate Majority Leader Reid demanded that Republicans explain “why they think more debt is good for the economy.” I remember the Democrats when they forced Reagan to come hat-in-hand begging for a debt ceiling every five months, and laughed hysterically that Barack Obama had the balls to demand he get the most massive debt ceiling increases in history that would last past the 2012 election as if that was “reasonable.” I remember Democrats and Barack Obama demonizing George Bush over Iraq and Afghanistan. I remember Obama demonizing the surge strategy and predicting it would lead to more sectarian violence. You know, before the same Obama’s administration actually took credit for Iraq as “one of the great achievements of this administration.” I also remember Obama demonizing Bush in Afghanistan where Obama claimed Bush was just “air-raiding villages and killing people.” 

You mention the “2 wars” without mentioning that Bush WON one of them while Obama massively escalated the war and is nevertheless LOSING the other (see also here).  You also forget to mention that Obama has actually gotten us into three MORE wars – with Libya (which is about to seriously melt down), Yemen and the “secret war” Obama is waging in Pakistan.  Libya alone has cost America nearly a BILLION DOLLARS so far.

Obama is on pace to send more American soldiers to their graves than Bush did during his first term.  And yet somehow all the protestors who screamed at Bush are so silent I hear the crickets chirping (hypocrite alert).  Obama has actually killed more civilians than Bush did, and yet see how the media protect their messiah.

But you’ve got an idea, don’t you, Chuck.  Why don’t we all blame Bush for everything.

Democrats take credit for every single sunrise and blame Bush for every damned sunset.  It’s one of the ways that they show they’re vermin.

“Republicans want Obama out.”  Cry me an ocean. Because with all due respect, if you don’t understand that Democrats wanted BUSH out, then you are a pathetically stupid idiot and I won’t even waste my time with you.

But assuming you AREN’T a pathetically stupid idiot, you instead are a hypocrite without shame, Chuck, if you don’t mind my saying. You and your ilk unrelentingly demonized George Bush for eight crazy years. And now you’re upset that we Republicans would do unto Obama as you did unto Bush. You’d be ashamed of yourself, if you were capable of that virtue.

You talk about “the real problem is congress.” You somehow omit to mention that Democrat had control of both the House AND the Senate for the two years prior to the 2008 collapse. You seem to omit the fact that unemployment was 4.6% when the Democrats took control of Congress before that collapse. You somehow omit that it was Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that led to and caused the rest of the housing mortgage industry to collapse in 2008 which in turn blew up our economy, and that Bush and Republicans tried SEVENTEEN TIMES to reform Fannie and Freddie but were stopped by shrill Democrat opposition.

I recently wrote that up in an article about how the Democrats set up America for the 2008 collapse, and Barack Obama became their king.

You utterly lack the integrity to admit that if Bush was responsible for the bad economy then simply because he was president even though Democrats controlled both the House and the Senate that OBAMA is responsible for the bad economy now when Democrats controlled the House, the Senate AND the White House for the two years since 2008 and STILL control the White House and the Senate NEARLY THREE YEARS AFTER BUSH LEFT OFFICE.

For the record, it has now been 847 days since Democrats passed any kind of a budget whatsoever. Which is another way of saying, “Democrats are a total disgrace.”  But hey, let’s blame that complete and utter failure of Democrats and ONLY Democrats on George Bush and the Tea Party that barely even existed yet when this total abdication of leadership began.

You know what we need, Chuck, besides a lot fewer people like you? We need a president who actually says, “I am president. This is MY economy. I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS COUNTRY. AND INSTEAD OF CONSUMING ALL MY TIME TRYING TO FIGURE OUT NEW WAYS TO BLAME THE OTHER PARTY OR THE LAST PRESIDENT LIKE OBAMA HAS, I AM ACTUALLY GOING TO LEAD.”

And one way our president could lead would be by presenting a budget that wasn’t so utterly vile and beneath contempt that not even ONE DEMOCRAT in a DEMOCRAT-CONTROLLED SENATE could vote for it, much less any Republicans.  You know, the way Obama did in presenting his joke of a budget that got voted down 97-0 in a Senate controlled by his own party.

Democrats are people who have NO budget and NO plan, but rely EXCLUSIVELY on demonization and fearmongering to relentlessly pursue even more big government power and tyranny. Democrats are people who scream hate about Republicans while at the same time patting themselves on the back for giving speeches about their “new tone of civility.”

DEMOCRATS exploded the economy in 2008 by creating the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac monsters and then refusing to allow them to be regulated at a time when regulation and reform might have saved us. And they took total control of this nation and exploded our debt by so much that we’ll probably NEVER be able to crawl out as our children’s children become debt slaves paying interest payments from YOUR DAMN SPENDING.

Never forget that.

P.S. There’s a whole lot more to take your “this is all about Republicans wanting Obama out” and shove it right up your @$$, isn’t there?  Because we don’t just have the past to look at; we’ve got yesterday and today to prove what loathsome hypocrite frauds you Democrats are.

Hey, the Democrats were on every television program and every newspaper they could get on calling the Tea Party Republicans “terrorists.”  Vice President Joe Biden was among them. “The Republicans held American hostage,” they kept saying over and over again even though it turns out that DEMOCRATS voted like “terrorists” at a higher rate than the Republican Tea Party Caucus all by itself. So, I mean, Republicans are terrorists and they’re the worst kind of people who hold America hostage, but it’s not like the Democrats who said that wanted Republicans “out,” is it????  Oh, no. I mean, that would demonstrate what utterly vile, despicable hypocrites Democrats like you would be with your two-faced double standard, wouldn’t it, Chuck???

And then we’ve got Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters who said “the Tea Party can go straight to hell.” And that doesn’t mean that she wants them “out,” of course. Maybe she was just inviting them to her miserable district where her miserable and evil policies have created hell-like conditions??? No, that probably isn’t it, because she said in her next breath, “And I intend to help them get there.”

Liberals like you are defined by your quintessential moral characteristic, Chuck. You are hypocrites. If a Republican Tea Party Caucus member were to say, “The Black Congressional Caucus can go straight to hell. And I intend to help them get there,” why, there’d be calls for that Republican’s resignation and impeachment, along with a demand for the complete dissolution of the Tea Party Caucus as inherently racist. There would literally be RIOTS. Not to mention the fact that it would be “racist” to have a White Congressional Caucus out to do the same thing for the white race that black congressmen want to do specifically for the black race – and riots if one were ever started – to begin with.

You cockroach liberals frame EVERY issue under the sun in terms of double-standard hypocrite rhetoric. You viciously attack us every single damn day while whining at the same time about Republicans not having your “civility.” You frame the heart of your message in Marxist class warfare, hatefully demonize the people who pay nearly ALL of our taxes as it is, and then demonize them as greedy if they have the balls to actually try to stand up for themselves and protect their families and try to leave what they built for their children.

Your policies lead to poverty every single time they are tried. You claim to only want to help minimum wage workers by forcing businesses to pay them more than their labor is worth, and look what happens: teen and minimum wage-level unemployment goes through the roof! Because you’ve priced them right out of a job. And you walk away from those poor people and create hell – the hell of Maxine Waters – somewhere else. You have destroyed industry after industry with your union agenda. You’ve made American products too expensive and America uncompetitive. And then you whine like spoiled children when businesses are forced to react by moving overseas. You demand more regulations and then more regulations on top of the regulations you’ve added. And those regulations cost businesses more than $2 trillion in compliance cost. And that figure is SOARING due to ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank and EPA regulations you’re forcing through as we speak. And then you can’t understand why businesses can’t be productive even though you’re strangling them and demagoguing them.

And all you have to offer is still MORE class warfare, and MORE demonization – all the while shrilly and hysterically crying that “this is all about Republicans wanting Obama out.”

Man do people like you ever disgust me.

It shouldn’t surprise you at all to know that seventy members of the Democrat Party are officially members of the Socialist Party of America.  It shouldn’t surprise you that Democrats are the unpatriotic party of America.  It shouldn’t surprise you that exposure to an American flag has a way of turning people away from the Democrat Party and making them Republicans.

Republicans want Obama to lose because Obama is destroying America, and Republicans want to get this evil fool out of office before we circle the drain beyond the point of no return.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

5 Responses to “‘Republicans Just Want Obama To Lose’ And Other Utterly Stupid Democrat Talking Points”

  1. Robbie Says:

    http://michellemalkin.com/2011/08/23/what-happened-when-katy-perry-tweeted-pray-for-israel/

    dont know if you saw this michael – gee do you think anyone in hollywood will stand up for her – and actual free speech – not the pretend rights they are always babbling about!

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    Robbie,

    I don’t know if you’re old enough to remember the “crying Indian” commercial about the Indian Chief riding around on his horse looking over hideous pollution, with the ad ending up in a close up of him shedding a tear.

    But I feel very much like that Indian these days. I look at all the entitlement, the flash mobs, the failed stimulus followed by the demand for an even BIGGER stimulus, and that tear the Indian shed for what he saw his land turning into makes a lot more sense. And the vile attitude toward Israel is the capstone of vileness.

    Tell you what, world. I stand as one who prays for the PEACE (shalom) of Israel. And a bunch of rabid vicious pro-terrorist pro-child murder leftists aren’t going to make me reverse my position.

    I am on the side of Jehovah God, the God of Abraham, of Isaac and of Jacob. And God is on the side of His people Israel.

    When you come for all the Jews, I want you to come for me to, God-hating world.

    As for Katy Perry, it appears nobody stood with her, and she caved like a sink-hole when her “fans” turned rabid.

  3. Michael Eden Says:

    And here’s another example under the headline, “How do Democrats’ heads not explode trying to contain all the massive contradictions?”

    Quote:

    “Let us all remember who the real enemy is. The real enemy is the Tea Party,” Rep. Frederica Wilson, D-Fla., said at a Miami town hall, according to The Hill. “The Tea Party holds the Congress hostage. They have one goal in mind, and that’s to make President Obama a one-term president.”

    I’ll post the entire article beneath my comments, just to preserve it for the record. But here’s the main point: this is a Democrat who literally believes that “the real enemy” of America is the Tea Party. It’s not al Qaeda, it’s not the Chinese, it’s conservative Republicans who want to make huge cuts in spending so America doesn’t go bankrupt. And as an illustration of just how graphically and genuinely evil these Republicans are, they actually want to make Obama a one-term president.

    What is utterly amazing is that it’s fine in Frederica Wilson’s warped and depraved mind if she despises and hates the Tea Party above and beyond all other things in existence. But the Tea Party has no right whatsoever to think that Democrats are wrong.

    I don’t give a rotten fig if Democrats think I’m evil. One day God will judge between us, and it will turn out that either God smiled benignly while Democrats aborted 54 million innocent human beings (and counting) and facilitated a billion abortions around the globe – and will judge people like me harshly for trying to protect these innocent lives – or Democrats will burn in hell for a trillion times a trillion years for every second of life for each one of those 54 million babies that liberals ruthlessly exterminated.

    Because eternity in hell isn’t long enough for one side to suffer for its evil. And I believe that the Bible couldn’t be much more clear which side will be vindicated and which side will learn to scream and scream and scream.

    So Democrats thinking I’m evil doesn’t bother me one bit.

    Here are some Scriptures that directly apply to Democrats:

    You love evil more than good, Falsehood more than speaking what is right. — Psalm 52:3

    But he who sins against Me injures himself; all those who hate Me love death — Proverbs 8:36

    Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! — Isaiah 5:20

    You who hate good and love evil, Who tear off their skin from them And their flesh from their bones — Micah 3:2

    Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools – Romans 1:22

    For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all the ungodliness and wickedness of those who in their wickedness suppress the truth – Romans 1:18

    In their case, the god of this world has blinded the minds of those who do not believe to keep them from seeing the light of the glorious gospel of the Messiah, who is the image of God. — 2 Corinthians 4:4

    Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron — 1 Timothy 4:2

    For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. — 2 Tim 4:3-4

    Here’s the thing that just drives me batty:

    Think of the Nazis and the Jews as an analogy. The Nazis were doing everything they could to exterminate the Jews. Imagine if the Nazis at the same time they were trying to kill every single Jew were morally outraged that the Jews actually hated the Nazis. “How DARE you want to make our beloved Adolf a one-term Führer! How DARE YOU!”

    The only word I can think of to explain Frederica Wilson and every single Democrat (Chuck included) who harbors this kind of rage against Republicans while at the same time being livid that Republicans want to defeat Democrats in elections is “psychotic.”

    It is so far beyond sanity that it is unreal.

    That the same people who say, “The Tea Party can go straight to hell. And I intend to help them get there,” actually think it’s evil for Republicans to NOT want to go straight to hell are simply so far beyond rabid and so far beyond sanity that all we can do is utterly defeat them.

    There is no point whatsoever in trying to compromise with people who are this far beyond the capacity of reason.

    The article:

    Jesse Jackson, Democrats: Tea Party Racists, ‘Real Enemy’
    Tuesday, 23 Aug 2011 09:30 PM

    Days after Rep. Maxine Waters told her supporters the tea party movement could go “straight to hell,” a fellow House Democrat said the movement is “the real enemy.”

    “Let us all remember who the real enemy is. The real enemy is the Tea Party,” Rep. Frederica Wilson, D-Fla., said at a Miami town hall, according to The Hill. “The Tea Party holds the Congress hostage. They have one goal in mind, and that’s to make President Obama a one-term president.”

    Wilson’s comments suggest that members of the Congressional Black Caucus may be following a uniform strategy in attacking the tea party. This in spite of frequent calls by Democrats for a move civil tone in political discourse.

    “This is a tough game. You can’t be intimidated. You can’t be frightened. And as far as I’m concerned — the Tea Party can go straight to hell,” Waters, D-Calif., said at a town-hall-style meeting in California.

    The Rev. Jesse Jackson, also participating in the town hall, compared the modern tea party movement to opposition to the civil-rights movement. “The Tea Party is a new name on an old game,” he said. “Dr. King fought a ‘tea party’ in Alabama.”

    For what it’s worth, Dr. King was a registered Republican. The Democrat Party fought one of the bloodiest Civil Wars in human history to keep the institution of slavery; the Republcian Party was specifically formed on the platform of ending slavery; and the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party and targeted blacks and Republicans.

  4. Daniel Reed Says:

    Liberalism (from the Latin liberalis) “freedom of individual, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.

    Conservatism (from the Latin: conservare) “to preserve or restore what is established and traditional, status quo. Disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.

  5. Michael Eden Says:

    I’ve responded to this type of comment before, so it’s easier just to quote myself:

    Your description of “liberalism” is perfectly dandy – as long as people understand that what you present as a definition of modern liberalism is actually that of classical liberalism. Modern liberalism is FASCISM.

    What is classical liberalism?

    Classical liberalism is the philosophy committed to the ideal of limited government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets.

    What does that have to do with modern American liberals or the Democrat Party? Absolultely NOTHING. They walked away from ALL of it. Only Republicans are true to the ideals of classical liberalism.

    When you point out that individual rights are now claimed by conservatives, you kind of fall of the cliff of your own point. Because individual rights are CENTRAL to the “classical liberalism” as embraced and defined by our founding fathers.

    Liberals ABANDONED “classical liberalism” and embraced SOMETHING ELSE which they relabeled as “liberalism.”

    And when you look at what modern liberals want – particularly as being enacted by the Occupy Movement – you can clearly see fascist (national socialist) and Marxist (international socialist) thought written ALL OVER IT.

    That is, if you’re not conflating completely different things in an extremely intellectually lazy manner.

    Limited government? Liberals HATE the idea of limited government and worship The State.

    Constitutionalism? Piss on the Constitution; liberals twist it to mean whatever the hell they want it to mean by refusing to interpret it in the literal-historical manner which alone is fitting to “constitutionalism.”

    Rule of law? After Obama’s ignoring the rule of law (and the Senate’s constitutionally guaranteed role of “advise and consent”) to illegally appoint people the Senate had blocked? Yeah, right.

    I could go on, but I’ve got other things to do.

    This is Obama’s “liberalism” in a nutshell: Obama met with fascist members of the racist organization “La Raza” (which literally means, “The RACE,” btw) and was asked to do a backdoor amnesty. Obama responded at the time:

    “The idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you, not just on immigration reform. But that’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.”

    And then about a month or so later Obama went ahead and did the very thing he himself had rightly labelled “not how our system works” (i.e., un-American); not how our democracy functions (i.e., anti-democratic); and not how our Constitution is written” (i.e. blatantly unconstitutional).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: