“This administration – I try not to pat myself too much on the back – but this administration has done more in terms of the security of the state of Israel than any previous administration,” he added.
Yeah, don’t pat yourself on the back, you wicked liar. You might pull a muscle and harm your golf swing.
Barack Obama is not unlike a rapist who says of his latest victim, “I loved that woman more than any previous man.”
Yesterday, President Obama called on Israel to go back to its borders of 1967, which put the Jewish State at just 9 miles wide. Netanyahu immediately rejected that call yesterday and rejected it again in front of the world today.
“Israel cannot go back to 1967 lines,” Netanyahu said. “We can’t go back to the indefensible lines.”
Throughout his remarks, Obama claimed the goal of his administration is for Israel to be a secure state living in peace next to a contiguous Palestine. In order for Palestine to be contiguous, Israel would have to be divided into two.
But that’s what friends are for, right? Divide them and leave them utterly defenseless while saying you’ve done more for your good buddy than anybody ever ever.
It is incredibly frustrating to deal with a Barry Hussein. He’s the kind of man who will put his arm around you even as he stabs you in the back. And then he’ll proceed to either completely deny that he in fact stabbed you in the back, or claim that stabbing you in the back was actually somehow good for you. And you’ve got a Joseph Goebbels media machine which then does an even better job justifying the Obama rhetoric than Obama did, along with millions of progressives who have successfully inoculated themselves from ever being exposed to actual truth.
Here is the reason why Obama is making such amazingly outlandish statements: he’s losing the Jewish vote big-time, as a recent election in an overwhelmingly Jewish and Democratic district demonstrates:
But it’s undeniable: a major problem for Weprin is that, despite being a pro-Israel Orthodox Jew running against a non-Jewish Republican in a heavily Jewish and Democratic district, he is being hurt, perhaps fatally, by President Obama’s unpopularity in the district, which is in parts of Brooklyn and Queens, in part due to Israel. A new poll yesterday confirmed one from last week that showed Bob Turner, the Republican, up six points. More specifically, 37 percent of voters said Israel was “very important” to their decision, and of these, 71 percent are supporting Turner; and meanwhile only 30 percent approve of Obama’s handling of Israel—and only 22 percent of Jews. Put these numbers together and a clear picture emerges: to those who care about Israel (and particularly to Jews who care about Israel), Obama is not pro-Israel.
Obama more pro-Israel than Bush? Not according to Israelis, who presumably have a pretty good idea who is pro-Israel and who isn’t:
Just 9 percent of Jewish Israelis think US President Barack Obama’s administration is more pro-Israel than pro-Palestinian, according to a Smith Research poll taken this week on behalf of The Jerusalem Post.
Forty-eight percent said that the Obama presidency favored the Palestinian side, 30% said his administration was neutral and 13% chose not to express an opinion for the survey, which has a margin of error of 4.5 percentage points.
[…]
The May poll found that Israelis’ views of Obama’s predecessor in the Oval Office, George W. Bush, were nearly the opposite. Some 88% of Israelis considered Bush’s administration pro-Israel, 7% said he was neutral and just 2% labeled him pro-Palestinian.
Add to that the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is the most dishonest and dishonorable rat bastard who has ever inhabited the White House. The man simply lies without shame, as does the Joseph Goebbels-inspired mainstream media machine:
Obama Administration Apparently Leaks Misleading Story To Seem More Pro-Israel Than Bush
Posted by Matthew Knee Monday, September 26, 2011 at 10:04amThe News Beast reports that Obama sold Israel bunker buster bombs that the Bush administration had previously blocked in 2005.
The problem: In 2007, the Bush arranged for the bombs to be delivered in the 2009-2010 time period, which they were. Newsweek of course dutifully spun the story to emphasize Bush’s original refusal, rather than the fact that the bombs arrived when Bush had promised they would.
Obama doesn’t deserve points for every agreement with Israel he doesn’t break. He deserves criticism for each one he does break, such as the agreement that promised Israel US support for building in certain parts of East Jerusalem.
But maybe I’m just too cynical. Surely this “leak,” conveniently spun by a friendly publication, has nothing to do with Obama’s “I’m not anti-Israel, now please give me your money so I can have four more years of being even more ‘not anti-Israel’ than I am now ” campaign to shore up his Jewish support. No, that would be crazy talk.
The fact of the matter is that Barack Obama’s policy toward both Israel and the entire Middle East is morally and rationally insane:
A Must-Read Essay By Israeli Physicist Haim Harari on the Arab Spring and Barack Obama’s Incoherent Policy
Posted by Joel B. Pollak Nov 30th 2011 at 12:51 pmIsraeli physicist Dr. Haim Harari, former president of Israel’s world-renowned Weizmann Institute of Science, recently laid forth an analysis of the Arab Spring and its aftermath that is a must-read as Egyptians elect a new government this week.
Harari points out that the only stable and powerful political forces in most Arab countries are the military and the Islamist movements, with some tribal forces playing a role in certain Arab states. The outlook for true liberal democracy–with individual rights, respect for opposition, and checks and balances of power–is therefore grim, Harari concludes.
In addition, Harari offers an analysis of the Obama administration’s foreign policy that summarizes its incoherence (emphasis added):
The American attitude of the Obama regime, during the evolving events in the Arab world, is truly amazing and baffling. One might understand and applaud an idealistic American attitude based on the principles of supporting freedom, justice and democracy everywhere. One could also understand a less honorable, but very pragmatic, American policy of supporting its friends in the Arab world, regardless of their own attitudes towards freedom and democracy. But there is no explanation, either idealistic or pragmatic, for a policy which works against dictatorial friends of America and does not oppose, in any significant way, all dictatorial foes of America.
Harari’s full essay is available here.
And that full essay is very much worth reading.
Egypt was Israel’s most solid ally in the Middle East. Yes, Hosni Mubarak was a thug, but he was a pro-American and pro-Israel thug.
A UK Telegraph headline says it all:
Egypt protests: America’s secret backing for rebel leaders behind uprising
For what it’s worth, there is a far more significant reason that Barack Obama is responsible for the incredibly euphamistically-titled “Arab Spring”: it was Obama’s policies and the reckless Obama Federal Reserve that devalued the currencies of Arab oil-producing states. The evidence is simply undeniable.
And so where is Egypt now, thanks directly to Barack Obama’s moral stupidity in destabilizing a valuable ally? Another headline says it all:
“Arab Spring… Islamists Make Huge Gains in Egyptian Elections & Slaughter Copts”
Now, understand something specifically about the Arab uprising in Egypt in relation to Israel: even JIMMY CARTER recognized that the “Arab Spring” uprising in Egypt directly threatened Israel’s security. Under the headline of “Former US President Jimmy Carter viewed that recent Cairo protests threaten “Israel”-Egypt peace treaty,” Jimmy Carter concludes, “I have no doubt that “Israel” has become increasingly isolated…”
Here’s Israel’s current situation under the Obama misrule:
Israeli diplomats have fled Egypt after an attack on their embassy in Cairo and were forced to leave Turkey after a diplomatic row. As Israel appears to lose its Muslim allies, many worry about possible repercussions on the peace process, Israel’s security and the U.S. role in the region.
Egypt and Turkey were allies of Israel before Obama showed up with that knife of his.
The fact of the matter is that NOBODY has done more to ISOLATE Israel from the few Arab allies it had than Barack Obama.
And let’s talk about Iran.
Remember how Bush tried to confront Iran about its development of nuclear weapons? Here’s what Obama and his future cabinent had to say to cut that effort down:
THE NATION – Democrats rip Bush’s Iran policy
Presidential candidates say a new intelligence report shows that the administration has been talking too tough.
By Scott Martelle and Robin Abcarian
December 05, 2007Democratic presidential candidates teamed up during a National Public Radio debate here Tuesday to blast the Bush administration over its policy toward Iran, arguing that a new intelligence assessment proves that the administration has needlessly ratcheted up military rhetoric.
While the candidates differed somewhat over the level of threat Iran poses in the Mideast, most of them sought to liken the administration’s approach to Iran with its buildup to the war in Iraq.
“I vehemently disagree with the president that nothing’s changed and therefore nothing in American policy has to change,” said New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. “We do know that pressure on Iran does have an effect. I think that is an important lesson.”
Delaware Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the new intelligence report indicated that Iran dropped its program before international pressure came into play.
“It was like watching a rerun of his statements on Iraq five years earlier,” Biden said. “Iran is not a nuclear threat to the United States of America. Iran should be dealt with directly, with the rest of the world at our side. But we’ve made it more difficult now, because who is going to trust us?”
The debate was aired without a studio audience over NPR, live from the Iowa State Historical Museum. It covered Iran, China and immigration, offering the contenders a chance to delve more deeply into subjects that often receive less detailed debate treatment.
Clinton and Biden were joined by Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, Connecticut Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, Ohio Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, and former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel.
[…]
The leading Democratic candidates have differed over whether to negotiate directly with Iran. In a July debate, Obama said he would be willing to meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a position criticized by Clinton and others. But front-runners Clinton, Obama and Edwards have all said they would not rule out military action against Iran.
For their part, Republican candidates have said that the new intelligence estimate did not change their view of Iran as a major threat to the United States — a view also held by Bush.
Now, as Iran races toward becoming a nuclear-armed military power, who was right? And who was COMPLETELY FULL OF CRAP???
You can thank the Democrat Party in general, and Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton in particular, for the upcoming nuclear Armageddon.
The Obama regime has done more than any administration in history to put Israel in mortal danger of a religious nihilistic enemy that has repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map and which believes that it must bathe the world in blood in order to cause the Twelfth Imam (or Mahdi) to be revealed.
And what of the Egyptian uprising that Obama was behind? Iranian madman Ahmadinejad says the uprising was the work of the Twelfth Imam!
And so the Egyptian uprising that Obama created – along with the nuclear weapons that Obama guaranteed Iran would be able to produce – has emboldened the Iranian regime toward the following scenario:
Islam requires that in order for the 12th Imam to reveal himself, the world must be in global war. Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reportedly believes that he has the divine mission to “hasten the return” of the 12th Mahdi. Destroying Israel, then America — erupts the world into the chaos needed for the Mahdi’s return.
Thanks for opening the doorway to hell, Barry Hussein!!!
Thanks to Obama, Israel will be put in the untenable position of either attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities – and suffering the harsh consequences of retaliation – or else haplessly sitting by while its mortal enemy develops the means to destroy whatever is left of the tiny nation of Israel that Obama allows the Jews to keep.
And according to this pathetic, demon-possessed fool Obama, this is “doing more in terms of the security of the state of Israel than any previous administration.”
It’s frightening enough that Obama would lie in such a stupendous manner; it’s even more terrifying to consider the fact that he might actually believe his lies.
Barack Obama is the coming Antichrist’s most useful of all idiots. The Bible records that the coming Tribulation will officially begin when Israel signs a seven-year covenant with Antichrist. The question is, “Why will Israel sign this treaty?” And the answer is, “Because under Barack Obama, the United States – Israel’s last ally – abandoned Israel and gave her no choice but to sign.”
The beast is coming. And hell is coming with him.
And Barack Obama paved the way for him with his actions and his lies.
Tags: Arab uprising, nuclear, than any previous administration, this administration has done more in terms of the security of the state of Israel
Start Thinking Right 
Leave a Reply