And it aint going to be getting any better as we live Obama’s “hope and change” moving forward.
Even the New York Times has acknowledged the grim very possible reality of gasoline averaging $5 a gallon nationwide this year:
HOUSTON — Gasoline for $5 a gallon? The possibility is hardly far-fetched.
For the record, it isn’t very far from that right now where I live in California. I gassed up yesterday for $4.70 a gallon.
But suddenly the same mainstream media and the same Democrat Party that demonized George W. Bush every single day that gasoline prices were high say none of this catastrophically high gas price business can possibly be messiah Obama’s fault. Even though I pointed out that this was all simply the stated fruition of Obama all along:
You remember that quip Obama gave us that under his policies, energy prices “would necessarily skyrocket“?
Remember that Obama appointed an energy secretary named Steven Chu who said, “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe”??? With gasoline prices in Europe consistently hovering between $7 and $10 a gallon??? Steven Chu said that in explaining the Obama policy of “progressively” making gasoline more and more expensive in order to force Americans to turn to alternative energy sources. And one of the ways Obama wants to accomplish that dream (which amounts to a nightmare for working Americans) is to tax Americans for driving by the mile.
As you contemplate $4 and even $5 a gallon gasoline prices, let me just say one word: KEYSTONE.
Energy Secretary Steven Chu told a House panel Tuesday that he’d give himself top marks when asked to grade his policies’ effects on energy prices. Rep. Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House committee on Oversight and Government Reform, asked President Obama’s top energy official if he’d grade himself with an “A minus” on “controlling the cost of gasoline at the pump.”
Chu responded by saying he’d give himself a better grade than that.
“The tools we have at our disposal are limited, but I would I say I would give myself a little higher in that since I became Secretary of Energy, I’ve been doing everything I can to get long-term solutions,” Chu said.
Chu would give himself the top grade on gas prices despite that fact that the average price for a gallon of gas just hit $3.87 – the highest ever recorded in the month of March, according to ABC News.
I actually agree with Chu. He SHOULD get an A – for making gasoline the most expensive over the longest period of time we’ve ever seen. Which is exactly what he set out to do.
It was a question from John Harwood at CNBC: “So could the high oil price help us?” and Obama said, “Well, I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment, a gradual increase.”
Obama’s full statement:
OBAMA: I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment. The fact that, ehh, this is such a shock t’American pocketbooks is not a good thing. Uh, but if we take some steps right now t’, uh, help people make the adjustment — first of all by putting more money into their pockets, but also by encouraging the market to adapt to these new circumstances more quickly, particularly US automakers.
And yes, Youtube – owned by überliberal Google – has managed to scrub that teeny-weeny little Obama statement of his energy policy. Because apparently Obama used his same Führer-messiah power to get the media to refuse to cover the news if it makes him look bad that has been very recently demonstrated elsewhere.
Just try to imagine what would have ensued if Bush had asked the mainstream media to literally scrub an already published story from their little Ministry of Truth complex. The Marxists who write our news would have a) broadcast Bush’s request and framed it in terms of a Big Brother fascist narrative; and b) blared the news Bush had asked them to scrub all over the airwaves just out of pure spite.
Now, go back to what Obama said and then allow me to explain what Obama SHOULD have said and why his answer is not only deplorable, but depraved. Obama should have said:
“Could higher gas prices help us? Absolutely NOT! High gas prices hurt the American people, it hurts the American economy and it undermines the American way of life. High gas prices are the worst form of regressive tax – by which I mean it would be a tax that afflicts poor people and particularly poor working Americans – far more than it would harm wealthier people who afford expensive gasoline. And I will do absolutely everything in my power as president to ensure that the American people are able to purchase gasoline at prices that will enable them to get to work and live their lives.”
Do you see the difference in those two statements?
And which statement do YOU prefer as you consider voting for president this November? Obama’s or the conservative’s?
When Obama was running for president he openly mocked Bush’s energy plan, saying ” it would not produce a drop of oil for seven years.” And Obama was right in the limited sense that it takes time for an energy policy to bear fruit tomorrow. And Obama’s implicit energy goal was that if he was elected president he wanted future Americans to suffer because of his refusal to pursue energy. And – as Obama’s reverend once said – that future is beginning to “come home to roost.”
Obama has put 85% of the outer continental shelf off limits to drilling and is making only 3% available for petroleum exploration and development. Drilling in regions like the Colorado Rockies is down fully 70% due to Obama’s policies relative to George Bush’s policies.
Why does Obama and his energy secretary Steven Chu want oil prices to be the same (about $10 a gallon now) as Europe? It’s very simple: they have a Marxist red version of a radical environmentalist green vision of energy: they want to force the American people to “choose” the energy they WANT them to choose. And if they can’t simply mandate that “choice” like the fascists they are – which would amount to political suicide – their only option is to price gasoline out of the ballpark and force Americans to buy the little green clown cars and the electric golf cart cars that they want.
People like Barack Obama and Steven Chu sit in their limousines and see an average American driving down the road in a halfway cool car and say, “That’s unacceptable. There should be a much bigger difference between the elites who run the world and the proletariat masses.”
Let’s sum it up in a picture. This is a Soviet Union proletariat car:
It’s the same damn kind of clown car with the same damn kind of radical environmentalist green clown car marketing that Obama and Chu want us in today. It’s a little tiny gutless piece of crap. And you ought to be driving one instead of something better, because frankly you’re a faceless nobody AND YOU SUCK. That’s the statist view of “an automobile for the people.”
So please reflect on the man that Barack Obama appointed to “get an A” with his current energy prices. Consider that Obama knew Chu had said:
Consider that the very same Obama who is now our president said that he was going to make energy prices “necessarily skyrocket.”
And decide what kind of future that you want.