Is America A Fair And Decent Place? Americans Say Yes, Obama Says America Is Unfair And Discriminatory (And How ‘American’ IS That?)

Here are the results of a new survey documenting just how far from the American people our Marxist-in-Chief truly is:

64% Say U.S. Society is Fair and Decent
Tuesday, March 20, 2012

A sizable majority of voters continues to feel that the United States is generally a fair and decent place, but the number who think President Obama disagrees with them is at its highest level since late 2010.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 64% of Likely U.S. Voters agree that American society is generally fair and decent. One-in-four voters (26%) disagrees and says society in this country is unfair and discriminatory. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on March 11-12, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Fieldwork for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Rasmussen also reports that 46% of voters think obama views america as unfair and discriminatory:

What we are getting in America is the fruits of a man who spent over twenty years of his life listening to a “reverend” who said things like, “No, no, no!  NOT God bless America!  God DAMN America!”

Tags: , , , ,

8 Responses to “Is America A Fair And Decent Place? Americans Say Yes, Obama Says America Is Unfair And Discriminatory (And How ‘American’ IS That?)”

  1. Ben Hoffman Says:

    They probably only polled conservatives. Rasmussen has the most biased polls out there.

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    Rasmussen has the most biased polls out there.

    They probably only polled conservatives. Rasmussen has the most biased polls out there.

    Ben Hoffman,

    You are someone I’ve blocked before for being utterly vile. And you’re going to stay blocked because you appear to be pathologically incapable of saying anything that isn’t utterly idiotic.

    I let you back in just to point out that you have to be one of the most asinine creatures I’ve ever come across.

    Rasmussen has the most biased polls out there?

    This ought to serve to show what a complete and total ass you are.

    The Fordham analysis ranks 23 survey research organizations on their final, national pre-election polls, as reported on

    On average, the polls slightly overestimated Obama’s strength. The final polls showed the Democratic ahead by an average of 7.52 percentage points — 1.37 percentage points above his current 6.15-point popular vote lead. Seventeen of the 23 surveys overstated Obama’s final victory level, while four underestimated it. Only two — Rasmussen and Pew — were spot on.

    Here is the list –

    1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**

    1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

    3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)

    4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)

    5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*

    6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*

    6T. ARG (10/25-27)*

    8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)

    8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)

    10. (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)

    11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)

    12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)

    13. FOX (11/1-2)

    14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)

    15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)

    16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)

    17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)

    18. Marist College (11/3)

    19. CBS (10/31-11/2)

    20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)

    21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)

    22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)

    23. Newsweek (10/22-23)

    And, for the record, Rasmussen basically tied for the most accurate polling in the 2004 national election. As liberal publication Slate stated:

    Look who’s laughing now. Rasmussen and SurveyUSA beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins.

    Slate Magazine and The Wall Street Journal reported that Rasmussen Reports was one of the most accurate polling firms for the 2004 United States presidential election and 2006 United States general elections. In 2004 Slate magazine “publicly doubted and privately derided” Rasmussen’s use of recorded voices in electoral polls. However, after the election, they concluded that Rasmussen’s polls were among the most accurate in the 2004 presidential election. According to Politico, Rasmussen’s 2008 presidential-election polls “closely mirrored the election’s outcome”.

    Liberals have declared war on Rasmussen and therefore you as a mindless liberal robot meat puppet have declared war on Rasmussen.

    As somebody who clearly has a fanatic and fascist hatred of truth, I can understand why you would say that the most reliable pollster is the most biased.

    Now get lost again, you abject disgrace to everything that has anything whatsoever to do with reason and truth.

  3. Ben Hoffman Says:

    Rasmussen Polls Were Biased and Inaccurate

    On Tuesday, polls conducted by the firm Rasmussen Reports — which released more than 100 surveys in the final three weeks of the campaign, including some commissioned under a subsidiary on behalf of Fox News — badly missed the margin in many states, and also exhibited a considerable bias toward Republican candidates.

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    Ben Hoffman,

    I’m glad you cited Nate Silver as your “proof” that Rasmussen is biased.

    First of all, Nate Silver is a well-known liberal pollster. Which is to say that the very same moron who comes to my blog saying Rasmussen is biased and bias is bad is an abject hypocrite with an obvious liberal bias. And how does your head not explode from trying to contain all of your self-contradictions???

    Second, Nate Silver HIMSELF had previously said that Rasmussen was one of the most accurate polling organizations out there:, a liberal Web site run by Nate Silver, found that Mr. Rasmussen had the third-highest mark for accuracy of any pollster in last year’s elections. He predicted a six-point Obama victory; the final margin was seven points. In 2009, Rasmussen did it again. His final survey in New Jersey had Republican Chris Christie beating Democrat Jon Corzine by three points, exactly the margin of Mr. Christie’s victory.”

    I’m guessing he wrote his piece praising Rasmussen, and then got an earful from the liberal cockroaches who started crawling up his anus out of their hatred for anything that smacks of actual reality, and he caved. Not that it matters; he’s your Arlen Specter of pollsters now.

    So you go ahead and put all your trust in a guy who is so inconsistent he repudiated himself. And then get lost.

  5. Ben Hoffman Says:

    You’re a liar, plain and simple. Your “proof” is a right-wing “news” outlet owned by Rupert Murdoch, the SOB who’s company hacked into the phones of 9/11 victims. Why don’t you just crawl back into the sewer with the other vermin.

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    You’re a liar, plain and simple. Your “proof” is a right-wing “news” outlet owned by Rupert Murdoch … Why don’t you just crawl back into the sewer with the other vermin.

    Ben Hoffman,

    That’s the way you respond after having your crap refuted? With a lunatic attack? And why am I not surprised?

    As for me being a liar, let’s see…

    Here are the latest five articles I’ve written not counting the one you’re commenting upon:

    I went through them and failed to find a single link to Fox News.

    Do I occasionally link to Fox News? Yeah – but not NEARLY as often as Media Matters does.

    I’d say that at MOST ten percent of my articles feature anything from Fox News. And since Fox News is the biggest broadcast news player on the planet, that isn’t really all that much.

    Meanwhile, I link to and cite numerous articles from the New York Times, the LA Times, even the Daily Kos, CBS, etc as a matter of routine.

    So you call me a liar, you liar, and you are literally lying when you do it.

    And here’s another thing, you deranged cockroach: why the hell do you – to put it in your words – keep “crawling” back to my blog? I searched your name in my comments, and there are a good fifty from you – and that doesn’t include the dozens I’ve blocked simply because you are a sick, evil, warped mind.

    Given what you obviously think about me (“You’re a liar, plain and simple”; “Your “proof” is a right-wing “news” outlet”; “Why don’t you just crawl back into the sewer with the other vermin”), why in the world would you “keep crawling” back to me??? Because I can honestly tell you that I have never wasted a single nano-second “crawling” to your cesspool, you sick insect.

    Now go crawl back to whatever rotting thing you live under. Because there are few sewer inhabitants that would ever allow you to stay with them.

    P.S., for the record, I just responded to another insect attacking Fox News. I suppose the Lord of the Flies has ordered his insect army for yet another swarm and the cockroach army with their little insect brains can do nothing but follow their bug-Führer.

  7. Ben Hoffman Says:

    The Wall Street Journal is owned by Rupert Murdoch you moron.

  8. Michael Eden Says:

    The Wall Street Journal is owned by Rupert Murdoch you moron.

    Ben Hoffman, you are truly a bug-feces-for-brains zombie.

    First of all, for the record, you just came crawling back to my blog again. You just can’t help yourself. I clearly am the marvelous, penetrating light in the darkness and you are clearly the mindless insect who is irresistably drawn to it.

    Okay, fine. Include the Wall Street Journal along with your “Insects Against Rupert Murdoch” tally. That’s maybe 15% of my sources that have anything whatsoever to do with Rupert Murdoch. At MOST. As anybody who wants to spend the time pouring over my links can document for themselves.

    And how DARE I cite the Wall Street Journal? After all, it is only THE LARGEST CIRCULATION NEWSPAPER IN AMERICA.

    I actually had a subscription to the Journal. But I decided that it was too expensive for me to keep up so I let it lapse. I’m kind of hoping they’ll get back to me with a deal.

    Meanwhile, I not only got the useless liberal piece of trash otherwise called “The Los Angeles Times” for $10 a year, but they actually sent me a 25$ Target gift card with my Thursday-Sunday subscription. And then they automatically upgraded me to weekly delivery status and wouldn’t stop daily delivery even after I called them and told them I didn’t even want daily delivery. They literally paid me to take their paper!!!! BECAUSE THEIR DAMN PAPER IS USELESS. Just like yourself, for the record.

    I literally just got the LA Times just for the coupons. And the Wall Street Journal doesn’t do any local coupons because it’s actually a decent NEWSPAPER that you have to pay out of your rear to get. AND IT’S STILL THE #1 PAPER in America because it’s a damn good newspaper. Unlike anything that your side can produce, given the way they keep filing for bankruptcy.

    But if it’s decent or has any credibility or reliability at all, fascist insects like you will hate it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: