Mainstream Media Lynching Of George Zimmerman Pretty Much Confirms Everything I’ve Said About Both Liberalism And ‘Journalism’

Keep in mind that the mainstream media (CBS being the primary culprit) posted video of George Zimmerman being arrested and claimed that there were “no apparent injuries” to Zimmerman.  And all the screeching liberals then stated as fact that George Zimmerman was a cold-blooded murderer, etc, etc.

It didn’t matter that it was a giant load of crap.  The liberal media is to “truth” what the sun is to “cold”; neither has so much as an iota of the aforementioned qualities.

There is no question that this picture obtained by ABC was taken by the officers at the shooting scene:

This simple FACT was obvious from the very start in the police report:

While I was in such close contact with Zimmerman, I could observe that his back appeared to be wet and was covered in grass, as if he had been laying on his back on the ground. Zimmerman was also bleeding from the nose and back of his head.”

No apparent injuries George Zimmerman’s bleeding head!  But there’s nothing wrong with being wrong as long as you’re serving as one of the faithful attack dogs for liberalism and political correctness, is there.  Which is why their blatantly obvious act of biased and deceitful reporting is simply whistled away.

One of the other things that was interesting that came out today was just how incredibly “Hispanic” Zimmerman looked:

In spite of everything the media did to try to cover that up so they could make him “white” – and therefore destroy him as a “racist bigot”:

Exhibit A: “Martin, who was black, was on his way to a convenience store in a mostly white gated community when George Zimmerman, who is white, shot and killed him after a disputed altercation.”  — Gwen Ifill, PBS “Newshour” anchor

Exhibit B: ABC deliberately altered the George Zimmerman booking photo to make him appear “white”:

THIS was the effect that the media was trying to create in doctoring/altering the photo to turn George Zimmerman into “whitey”:

It would have been a lot harder to fabricate if George Zimmerman had been Hispanic instead of the “pussy ass cracker” the mainstream media propaganda mill made him into.  It’s wrong to hate on Hispanics, of course, but every self-respecting liberal despises whitey – especially if that liberal is himself or herself white.  Self-hating whitey has been a requirement for liberals since Karl Marx came along and showed the left how to properly self-hate:

There were also great Jewish philosophers who suffered from an aggravated confusion over their Jewish identities. Karl Marx is perhaps the most extreme example of this. It is curious to note that both his mother and father were the offspring of rabbis. Marx’s father, who became a prominent Russian Jewish lawyer, converted to Protestantism because of an edict prohibiting Jews from being legal advocates. In Marx’s own materialistic interpretation of the world, he found no place for a valid Jewish experience. In his essay “Zur Judenfrage” (“About the JewishQuestion”) he wrote:

What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money…Out of its entrails bourgeois society continually creates Jews.” [Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 11, pp. 1071- 1074]

How ironic that Marx’s view of his own Jewish people became a view of Hitler, who boasted of his anti-Communism.

And of course there was nothing “ironic” about it: Nothing would have made Karl Marx happier than to find out that somebody was “inspired” by his writings to put 6 million of his fellow Jews into gas chambers; just like nothing would make a white liberal happier than having his own race marginalized and demonized in a “multi-cultural society.”  The liberal mind is a diseased mind; and self-loathing is the fruit of a diseased mind.

Exhibit C: The New York Times infamously labelling George Zimmerman as a “white Hispanic” in defiance of their very own “political correctness” and in frightening similarity to the Nazi Mischling laws of the 1930s that attempted to categorize how “Jewish” one was:

Mr. Zimmerman, 28, a white Hispanic, told the police that he shot Trayvon in self-defense after an altercation. The teenager was walking home from a convenience store, where he bought iced tea and Skittles, when he was shot once in the chest.

Let’s try that: Mr. Obama, 50, a white African-American, lied to the American people again today…

Nope.  Sounds pretty damn racist. 

The Washington Times puts a lot of the mainstream media propaganda shenanigans together:

I see that the New York Times let us know the dastardly George Zimmerman was a “white Hispanic” – and the Times seems to have put an emphasis on “white.” However, it did not tell the general public that Mr. Zimmerman is a registered Democrat.

Now we learn that the NBC News department left off the question from the police dispatcher asking Mr. Zimmerman the race of the person he was following, Trayvon Martin. Why was that omitted? In both cases, the omissions seem to have been made only to support the developing narrative that mean, white George Zimmerman is a racist.

How could the New York Times make the distinction that he was white? And leaving out the question from the dispatcher as to the race of the person being followed made it appear that Mr. Zimmerman could have been targeting Trayvon for his race. By now everyone must know that ABC News also got to take a few shots at Mr. Zimmerman. When broadcasting a video of him, ABC conveniently covered the back of his head with a banner on the screen. After receiving many complaints, they removed the banner, and then you could see it appeared that Mr. Zimmerman had some kind of cut on the back of his head. Dare I ask again why this happened? Was the object to tell this story, or was it to hide the truth?

Then there’s the crap they pulled with Trayvon Martin by bombarding us with pictures of a smiling little twelve-year old boy:

Instead of what he really looked like at the time George Zimmerman saw him:

Let’s try that with another sweet-faced and obviously innocent guy:

Charles Manson was a charming young kid who couldn’t have done anything wrong and that picture proves it.

And of course the same mainstream media propaganda machine that pimped pictures of a twelve-year-old and clearly “innocent” Trayvon Martin rather than showing him for what he was when it MATTERED  (the night of the shooting) simultaneously used a booking photo from the worst moment in George Zimmerman’s life.  And then doctored it to frame him even FURTHER in the court of public opinion.

ALL of the mainstream media has been convicted for obvious bias and deceit.

NBC despicably altered the 911 call audio to deceitfully make it appear that George Zimmerman was a racist who was out to emphasize that Trayvon Martin was black:

The Today show’s segment, which included an ellipsis on screen to indicate omitted text, ran as:

Zimmerman: ‘This guy looks like he’s up to no good …’

Zimmerman: ‘He looks black.’

The full conversation ran as:

Zimmerman: ‘This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.’

Dispatcher: ‘OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?’

Zimmerman: ‘He looks black.’

NBC literally tried to explain that this was just some perfectly innocent error, that some engineer somehow accidentally happened to inadvertently erase the dispatcher’s voice and it was all just completely innocent.  And only a diseased liberal mind would accept that “explanation,” just as only a diseased liberal mind would try to fabricate “evidence” to falsely turn a man into a “racist” to begin with.

In the same way, CNN “enhanced” the 911 audio to “prove” that George Zimmerman was a racist bigot who said – and excuse the language here – “fucking coons” during the 911 call.  BUT IT WAS A LIE:

Recently, CNN enhanced audio of George Zimmerman — the man who shot Trayvon Martin — to try to determine if he did, in fact, use a racial slur while calling police on the night of the shooting. Back then, it sounded like Zimmerman might have used the phrase “fu**ing coons,” and his critics have cited it as evidence of a racially-motivated attack. But now CNN has enhanced the audio again, and the reporter is casting doubts that the term was used.

(Related: ‘This Is for Trayvon’: 6 Youths Attack 78-Year-Old Man in Alleged Racially-Charged Attack)

“It certainly sounds like that word to me,” Gary Tuckman said when the audio was first enhanced. But after the latest enhancement, he’s not so sure:

“Now it does sound less like that racial slur. … From listening in this room, and this is a state-of-the-art room, it doesn’t sound like that slur anymore. It sounds like … we‘re hearing the swear word at first and then the word ’cold.’ And the reason some say that would be relevant, is because it was unseasonably cold in Florida that night and raining.”

The audio expert agreed it sounded like “cold,” and said the new method gets rid of a lot more background noise but doesn’t change the voice or words.

Sorry we fabricated evidence to turn you into a racist and incite pretty much the entire black community to want to murder you and your entire family, George.  Our boo-boo.  Sorry we helped destroy your life and all.

A further lie that I have heard reported over and over again is that George Zimmerman continued to follow Trayvon Martin after he was instructed to stop.  The evidence simply does not support that; rather, it supports Zimmerman’s account that after being instructed to stop following Martin he got a final address and then began heading back to his truck:

From the call released by the Sanford Police:

At 2:07, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, “He’s running.”

At 2:09, you can hear a car door open and an alarm begins that is undoubtedly the “door open, keys in ignition” warning on Zimmerman’s truck.

At 2:13, you can clearly hear the car door slamming shut, and the alarm stops.

At 2:17, Zimmerman’s voice wobbles and he starts breathing heavily into the phone, indicating that he has started running.

At 2:22, without any prompting other than the aforementioned noises and breathing, the dispatcher asks “Are you following him?” to which Zimmerman responds, “Yeah.”

At 2:26, the dispatcher says, “Okay, we don’t need you to do that,” to which Zimmerman responds, “Okay.”

Zimmerman proceeds to give the dispatcher his name. Then he says, “He ran.”

Zimmerman can still be heard breathing into the phone until about 2:39, at which point the heavy breathing stops entirely, a mere 13 seconds after the dispatcher asked him to stop following. A very calm and collected Zimmerman then proceeds to give the dispatcher his own information, directions and a description of his location for another 1 minute and 33 seconds.

The difference between someone running while on the phone and not running can be heard quite clearly, and I encourage readers to listen for themselves.

There’s another reason to believe that Zimmerman stopped following Martin: After he gives the dispatcher his personal address, at 3:35, he says, “Oh crap, I don’t want to give that all out. I don’t know where this kid is,” meaning he is worried Martin might hear where he lives. If Zimmerman doesn’t even know where Martin is, would it even be possible for him to still be following Martin at this point? Would it even be possible for him to have continued following Martin after hanging up the phone — a full two minutes after he first got out of his car and a minute and a half after he fully stops breathing heavily — unless Martin came back and revealed himself?

It was a mistake for Zimmerman to leave his car in the first place. But while the audio may not decisively prove that Zimmerman stopped following Martin when the dispatcher asked him to, it is very strong evidence that he did, especially when coupled with his testimony to police the night of the incident. But that isn’t even the point.

The point is this: With no witnesses stating that Zimmerman defied the dispatcher’s wishes and continued following Martin and no evidence to suggest he did, how did the idea that he pursued Martin after the dispatcher told him not to become a universally recognized, undisputed fact?

That it did is a testament to Al Sharpton’s ability to manipulate the media — and the media’s willingness to be manipulated.

The eyewitness in this case has almost completely confirmed George Zimmerman’s account of what happened that night:

But one man’s testimony could be key for the police.

“The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: ‘help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911,” he said.

Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.

The witness only wanted to be identified as “John,” and didn’t not want to be shown on camera.

His statements to police were instrumental, because police backed up Zimmerman’s claims, saying those screams on the 911 call are those of Zimmerman.

“When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point,” John said.

Zimmerman says the shooting was self defense. According to information released on the Sanford city website, Zimmerman said he was going back to his SUV when he was attacked by the teen.

Sanford police say Zimmerman was bloody in his face and head, and the back of his shirt was wet and had grass stains, indicating a struggle took place before the shooting

The police report that night also corroborates Zimmerman’s account:

According to the initial police report, Zimmerman, 28, told police he was screaming for help and that no one would help him. The report also said Zimmerman was bleeding from the nose and the back of the head.

Officials said in the report that Zimmerman’s back appeared wet and that he was covered in grass.

Nevertheless, there is widespread reports from the same biased and dishonest and slanted sources as did all the OTHER crap reporting that the cry for help could not have been George Zimmerman.

This is the liberalism and the news media propaganda that I have been describing for four years now.  It is evil; it is based on lies and pure distilled deceit on a daily basis.  And the more “established” and the more “elite” the media is – The New York Times, ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC – the more dishonest and biased it is.

Liberals might respond and say something like, “But it was those liberal media that corrected themselves.”  I’ve got two responses: the first is that the only reason the leftwing propaganda corrected their own lies is because honest media confronted them with their lies and forced them to make the corrections.  For example, in the case of NBC fabricating the 911 audio to remove the dispatcher asking Zimmerman to identify Trayvon Martin’s race we find:

NBC News issued an apology today for the way it edited a broadcast of a conversation between George Zimmerman and a police dispatcher before teenager Trayvon Martin was killed.

Last week Fox News did a report in which it presented ‘before’ and ‘after’ versions of the call. NBC had broadcast the edited exchange on its flagship ‘Today’ morning show.

NBC News launched an investigation after the Fox report. ‘During our investigation it became evident that there was an error made in the production process that we deeply regret,’ NBC News representative Lauren Kapp said in a statement on Tuesday.

If Fox News hadn’t been there to report the TRUTH – and liberals HATE Fox News FOR reporting the truth – that story would have never been refuted or corrected.

My second response is that opening the barn door after the horses have burned to death doesn’t exactly save the horses.  This gets to Mark Twain’s famous quip that a lie gets halfway around the world before the truth can get its boots on.  The media have got EXACTLY what they wanted: they have poisoned the country against George Zimmerman and flamed the fire of racist hate in the black community which largely continues to believe ALL of the above now-documented lies.

The judge frankly ought to dismiss this case and tell the black community – which is already beyond outraged after all the lies they have been told – that if they want to go after the people who are to blame for the case being thrown out, they ought to go after all the pseudo-journalists from the mainstream media who guaranteed that George Zimmerman could not possibly receive a fair trial.  Furthermore, even the left agrees that there is absolutely no way whatsoever that this case – having been so exploited by both Obama and the left – is going to end in a conviction.  It will be a referendum on guns, on Obama, on what Obama’s son would have looked like, on the stand your ground law, on race, on everything but what it SHOULD have been on.

Any possibility for true justice died in this case the day Barack Obama cynically exploited it:

Tags: , , , , , , ,

22 Responses to “Mainstream Media Lynching Of George Zimmerman Pretty Much Confirms Everything I’ve Said About Both Liberalism And ‘Journalism’”

  1. the unit Says:

    Becoming just black or white.

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    the unit,

    Racism is a one-way street – by which I mean the street liberals use to demagogue everybody else.

    For the record, the ONLY people I “hyphenate” is American Indians – and ONLY because simply calling them “Indians” leads to obvious confusion (“you mean Indians from India or …?”).

    I talk about “black people” the way I also refer to “white people” with no disrespect intended. If that offends, I’ll use the term “African.” But I WON’T play the “African-American” game until everybody agrees that I am a “Caucasian-American.”

    As a P.S., I love going to so-called “pow-wows” and live in an area where there are quite a few of them. Besides all the incredible art and the magnificent native costumes, I always enjoy chatting up the many American Indians who come from all over to enter the costumed dance as well as the Indian venders. I’ve encountered a few who harbored “anti-white” bitterness (which was NOT directed at me but at history and at the government!); but what I most enjoy is the sense of community and meaning in tradition that I experience. It has ALWAYS been a positive experience for me.

    I recognize that the American Indian has a lot of obstacles to overcome, but I always end up envying Indians for the powerful community that they are born into.

  3. gene willis Says:

    liberal jew media and the anti-racists make good bed fellows.if the jew media isnt trying to screww each othere for rating they collectivly screw all white people.

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    gene willis,

    I sure hope you didn’t make that comment thinking, “This conservative right wing guy is sure going to like this.”

    Because I’m one of those very pro-Israel conservative right wing guys.

    Another comment I haven’t responded to yet begins with the words,

    Liberals love to put people in boxes and label them

    Which is exactly what you did with your “Jew box.”

    As a conservative,” I know that there are a lot of groups and sub-groups that don’t vote the way I wish they would. But I don’t hate those groups or think of them as enemies because I VIEW PEOPLE AS INDIVIDUALS. I don’t blame “the Jews” and I don’t blame “the blacks” etc. etc. I recognize that people AS INDIVIDUALS individually think and act and vote AS INDIVIDUALS.

    And on that same idea, I therefore am not rooting for “the white people.” Because again I view people as individuals and there are a lot of white people I agree with and an awful lot of white people I would gladly trade in by the bushel for a conservative Jew or black person.

    Which is why I get so damn offended when Obama tells Hispanics, “You have to punish your enemies” (white people). Or when Harry Reid says, “I don’t know how anyone of Hispanic heritage could be a Republican.” Because I believe only truly vile people think that way.

  5. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE: Zimmerman will never get justice. He was a registered democrat, from a multiracial family. Not to mention NBC edited the audio tapes that left out the 911 operator, black man as well, that ASKED Zimmerman was the race the person (Martin)

    Yet this happens:

    WWII Bronze Star D-Day veteran killed by a young black thug. Where is Holder, Sharpton, Jesse Jerk-son.

  6. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaleE: There is more:

    In my opinion, the fact the Eric Holder, Jesse Jerk-son, Al Sharpton, obamarx have been silent on this case is by proxy an endorsement of the violence.

    The hypocrisy never, never ends from the left.

  7. Michael Eden Says:


    It’s not a crime when a gang of black men beat up a white man for the crime of being white and male.

    It’s “justice.” Oh, and “fairness,” too.

    If Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton wanted to kill me with shock, they would go to such a place and play their trade to help the poor white victims of black racism.

    That said, I have a feeling I’ll continue to live safely and securely in a world where Sharpton and Jackson are blatant hypocrite racial demagogues.

    By the way, the victims of the beating have received death threats. Because how DARE you survive a beating by racist black thugs in Obama’s America????

  8. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE: How true…. Not to mention the blatant, in-your-face-lie from NBC. Not sure if you caught this but here it is: NBC editing their copy of audio tapes of 911 call here:

  9. Michael Eden Says:

    It is as amazing as it is sickening how blatantly biased and propagandist and dishonest the mainstream media is today.

    As I keep saying, “the beast is coming.”

    Because when you have the level of rabid deception that is going on, hell on earth is right around the corner.

  10. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE: Most certainly.

  11. gene willis Says:

    mr. eden,who do you think runs the entire media outlets?have you not heard how the media reviles the whites in this third world country we now have to live in?the jew media have been spewing white hatred for decades and you think i am talking left or right beliefes?when the jew media starts reporting hate crimes fairly and unbiasly,then people well start respecting the people who run the media.until then,it’s not going to happen.

  12. Michael Eden Says:

    gene willis,

    Here’s what’s profoundly wrong with the attitude you’re expressing:

    1) You say the media is racist and that’s a bad thing but:
    2) You YOURSELF are a racist and you believe that’s a good thing.

    The media isn’t evil because it’s the “Jew media.” You yourself are very much “part of the problem” for having such a warped view toward the group of people who have suffered more AT THE HANDS OF PEOPLE WHO THOUGHT LIKE YOU than any other people in the history of the world.

    The media is evil because of it’s political and worldview ideology, NOT BECAUSE OF THE RACE OF ANYONE INVOLVED IN IT.

    Let me say something further: the greatest enemy of the Jews, it turns out, have been Jews who embraced the same hateful worldview elements as the “liberal mainstream media” that I routinely attack.

    Karl Marx was a Jew. Karl Marx was, to more fully state it, an ethnic Jew who utterly despised the Judeo-Christian view of the world and despised his own race because of the monotheism it stood for.

    Adolf Hitler, it turns out, in all probability had Jewish ancestry. And you know what that sonofabitch did. But Karl Marx and communism was as brutal toward Jews as the Nazis were.

    The “Jews” who run what you decry as “the Jew media” are LIBERALS. And they are people who hate Israel and the Judeo-Christian worldview and the monotheism and the Bible as the Muslim terrorists who want to wipe Israel of the map.

    I myself hate liberalism, which is quite frankly the worst elements of Marxism and the worst elements of fascism wrapped up into one political-correctness-spewing package. But as a Christian I love Jews whom God still has a plan for in these last days; I love Israel and defend her right to exist against the devil and all the enemies who hate her; and I love the Bible which was written almost entirely by Jews.

    The fact of the matter is that if you hate these things, if you hate Israel, if you hate the Judeo-Christian worldview, then it turns out that you are the useful idiot of the very “Jew media” you so actively despise. Because you hate exactly what they want you to hate.

  13. gene willis Says:

    mr. edan,i do not hate are doing just what i call the jewish owned media dose.twist words,put words out that are not true.take things out of contrast.can you prove beyond a doubt that the media dosnt hype anti hate crimes more on whites then anyothere race?can you prove that the media dosnt due double standard reporting on hate crimes?can you prove the media dosnt look for whites for every hate crime real or imagined?can you say for sure that the media reporting hate crimes and othere crimes are reported unbiasly when they report about white people?this anti racism-anti white double standards is practiced on a daily bases by the media.or as i call them,the jewish owned media.prove to me that when a hate crime from a minority is comitted on a whoite person that it would get national coverage just like the trayvon martin case.or the shannon christy christopher newsom didnt get.prove the media isnt anti white bias on whites and i will recant saying jewish owned media.remember,the story had to be run mre then six month with total caverage of all nation networks.not

  14. Michael Eden Says:

    gene willis,

    I’ve come across people like you. They’ll swear up and down they’re not racists or bigots, but somehow all they can do is talk negatively about whatever race they’re bigoted against.

    What people who think like you can’t seem to understand is that people don’t think or act the way they do because of their race; they think and act the way that they do because of their worldview.

    Sadly, a lot of American Jews are LIBERALS. THAT is a far bigger determinant as to their worldview than their being “Jewish” is. And the same thing is true of black people or Hispanic people, etc. Bibi Netanyahu, I can damn well assure you, thinks a HELL of a lot differently from the liberal Jews such as Democrat Henry Waxman who are doing their best to help all the OTHER damn liberals screw up the universe. And a LIBERAL Jew like Waxman hates his own and is all-too ready to throw “Jews” under the bus to advance the cause of his REAL people the liberal socialists.

    Karl Marx was a Jew. But you can find out just how rabidly that man hated Jews. He didn’t have a “Jewish agenda”; rather, what he had was a SOCIALIST agenda and he was willing to throw Jews or anybody else who go in the way of socialism into a meatgrinder.

    So you keep ranting about “Jews” and “jewish owned media” and jewish this and jewish that and you make me sick. There is NOT a conspiracy among Jews where all Jews get together and decide to piss you off. Rather, there IS a conspiracy among liberals to advance the liberal agenda. And it is the LIBERAL AGENDA that first turned on white men to advance feminism and is now turning on white people to advance a liberal racial agenda.

  15. GENE WILLIS Says:

    you didnt answear the question put to you.all you are trying to do is deflect any coments about who owns the media and why they are bias against white p[eople when reporting hate crimes compaired to minorities not concider white.

  16. Michael Eden Says:

    you didnt answear the question


    Dude, not only do YOU not “answear the question,” but you don’t even have the damn brains to say what the question IS that I allegedly didn’t “answear.”

    I don’t have any more time for you, having looked at two ridiculous comments in which you blather nonsense and accuse me without any kind of argument.

    By the way, you DO know who “owns the media” don’t you? LIBERALS.

    So if anything, you actually helped prove the very point I was making. Which means I DID “answear the question” after all.

  17. GENE WILLIS Says:

    okay,then provide actions to you’r comment that the jewish owned media isnt anti white when reporting hate crimes or any crime that dosnt fit thier naritives.if a crime has been commited by an unknown assailent,who dose the media blame?beltway sniper,new york bomber suspect,the use of the word crackers when reporting the news.hate crimes against whites staying only prove using the words bigot and racist to cover you’r own inactions.provide the ceo’s names who run the t.v net works.and lets leave the evkeing of racism out of thie conversation,i didnt accuse you of that,now did i?i was stating my opinion.have a nice day mr. eden.

  18. bren Says:

    call it the “anti-white” media – marxist media – etc – i feel many jews are at the heart of the “anti-white” movement but not all jews are “anti-white” – some are “pro-white,” sp,e are neutral – – – a whole race should not be blamed for what some or even many engage in

  19. Michael Eden Says:



    I don’t dispute a single thing you said. Today, tragically, Jews are THE most atheist and secular humanist people AS A GROUP on earth.

    But not ALL of them by any means.

    The last thing we should do if we AREN’T racist is to stop allowing race to define your demagoguery. People don’t do or think X, Y or Z because of the color of their skin; they do it or think it because of their moral character and their worldview. And it is the character of virtue and the worldview of Judeo-Christianity that is being toppled in our culture with nary a word of protest from the mainstream media.

    Maybe if we saw ourselves as “human beings” rather than as “[fill in your race here]” we could actually focus on THE PROBLEM and the crisis of our culture as it implodes.

  20. GENE WILLIS Says:

    mr.eden,what you reply will never come to pass unless media out lets cover the news fairly and honostly.however,i doubt that day will come,not until all whites are erarticated from the planet.then and only then will the jewish owned media have to call some othere race bigots and racists to get ratings.

  21. Michael Eden Says:


    If I haven’t already blocked you, I’m blocking you now. I am beyond disgusted with your hatred for Jews. Go “jewish owned media” somewhere else.

    I have patiently tried to explain decency to you: but you continue to believe that one is one’s race and one is not capable of being anything BUT one’s race. On your warped view, one is defined entirely by one’s race, such that if you are white, you think X and if you are Jewish, you must therefore think Y and there are no possible exceptions to this racial law of yours. You are simply sick to think that way.

    Jesus most certainly DID say, “In the last days race [ethnos] will rise against race.” You are one of the haters who are proving Jesus’ words describing the hatred and evil of the last days to be very much true and very much with us.

    Go away. I am simply not going to have the same identical argument with you over and over again as you go from article to article bitching about your hatred for Jews.

  22. Mike Says:

    So it’s true all blacks do look alike !! I am never surprised by the stupidity of anti white blacks and there cuckold sissy backers !! Take responsibility for your actions and take care of your own ! I curse the southern whites for introducing Africans to America to do work they should have done their selves ! Stop blaming others for your actions !! We gave you drugs guns booze other wise you guys would be pillars of society!! You guys have been killing raping robbing while the cracker was living in caves ! That’s how I hear it! Oh yeah you can blame your Jewish brothers who won’t even let the real Jews in to Isreal!! This planet will go up in smoke and some white bastard will come out of some underground shelter look around and Smile !!! Take responsibility for yourselves !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: