Chick-fil-A: Why Do I Keep Calling Liberals Fascist? Because THEY KEEP BEING FASCISTS, That’s Why

If you use my search engine to explore my use of the word “fascist,” you’ll see I “liberally” apply it to liberalism.  And to Obama and his liberal thugs.  What the Obama administration did with DOMA – passed by the House and Senate and signed into law by President Clinton – and what he has since done with illegal immigration in an incredibly illegal and cynical attempt to win the Hispanic vote are just a couple of your more obvious examples.

The thing is, I’m completely right to do so, and liberals keep proving that I’m completely right.

Chick-fil-A is the latest (well, there are a thousand examples every day, so let’s just say it’s the latest mass media example) example of liberal fascism.

Let me first just ask this question: when was the last time a religious conservative mayor went after a business for its anti-BIBLICAL views???

Emanuel goes after Chick-fil-A for boss’ anti-gay views
BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter July 25, 2012 11:12AM
Updated: July 26, 2012 8:44AM

The anti-gay views openly espoused by the president of a fast food chain specializing in chicken sandwiches have run afoul of Mayor Rahm Emanuel and a local alderman, who are determined to block Chick-fil-A from expanding in Chicago.

“Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago values. They’re not respectful of our residents, our neighbors and our family members. And if you’re gonna be part of the Chicago community, you should reflect Chicago values,” Emanuel said Wednesday.

“What the CEO has said as it relates to gay marriage and gay couples is not what I believe, but more importantly, it’s not what the people of Chicago believe. We just passed legislation as it relates to civil union and my goal and my hope … is that we now move on recognizing gay marriage. I do not believe that the CEO’s comments … reflects who we are as a city.”
Ald. Joe Moreno (1st) is using the same argument to block Chick-fil-A from opening its first free-standing restaurant in Chicago’s Logan Square neighborhood.

Chick-fil-A already has one Chicago store — at 30 E. Chicago near Loyola University’s downtown campus.
“Same sex marriage, same-sex couples — that’s the civil rights fight of our time. To have those discriminatory policies from the top down is just not something that we’re open to. …We want responsible businesses,” Moreno said.

“If he’s in the business of selling chicken in Chicago, he should be in the business of having equal rights for everyone. Period …. If it looks like a chicken, talks like a chicken, walks like a chicken, it’s a chicken. If you’re saying you don’t respect the values and rights of same-sex couples, that trickles down through the organization. … That’s paramount to the way the company behaves.”
Don Perry, vice president of corporate public relations for Chick-fil-A, and senior manager Jerry Johnston could not be reached for comment on the opposition from the mayor and Moreno.
Chick-fil-A has already obtained zoning approval to build a restaurant in the 2500 block of North Elston. But, the company still needs City Council approval to divide the land and purchase a lot near Home Depot.

Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy was quoted last week as saying he was “guilty as charged” for supporting, what he called the “biblical definition” of marriage as between a man and a woman.

“We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that,” Cathy was quoted as saying.

Appearing on the Ken Coleman Show, Cathy was further quoted as saying, “I think we’re inviting God’s judgment when we shake our fist at him, you know, [saying], ‘We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.’ And I pray on God’s mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude to think that we would have the audacity to try and redefine what marriage is all about.”
Cathy’s comments have infuriated gay rights activists across the nation, prompting their political allies to take a stand against the company.
Boston Mayor Thomas Menino has said Chick-fil-A “doesn’t belong in Boston” because of Cathy’s discriminatory stance.
On Wednesday, the tag team of Emanuel and Moreno joined the chorus, citing Cathy’s anti-gay views. The only question is whether they have a legal leg to stand on.
“Absolutely not,” said former Ald. William Banks (36th), the longtime chairman of the City Council’s Zoning Committee who presided over a massive re-write of the city’s 1957 zoning ordinance.

“Any alderman can hold a development issue for virtually any purpose. But if he’s doing it for the wrong reasons — if he’s citing a gay rights issue — there’s nothing illegal about that.”
Moreno said he has an ace in his back pocket if he runs into legal trouble: traffic and congestion issues caused by the store that have been the subject of behind-the-scenes negotiations for the last nine months.

Obama’s former chief-of-staff says people who believe the Bible are evil, but long-documented racist bigot haters like Louis Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam is exactly what this most violent and corrupt of cities needs for their “values.”

“Chicago values” rightly understood is a pejorative, as in, “How DARE you insinuate that my mother has ‘Chicago values’!”

Tell us that you recognize that a man sodomizing another man is a beautiful thing or we’ll take your business away from you!”  Those are values I don’t need.

For the record, it isn’t just Obama’s home city and Obama’s former chief-of-staff who are pissing all over free speech; another old liberal city is doing so as well:

“Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. You can’t have a business in the city of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re an open city, we’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion.”

I can now officially define “inclusion” for you: it means singling out and attacking anyone or anything that doesn’t completely agree with what liberals think.

And in San Francisco:

San Francisco Mayor Ewdin Lee also joined the chorus opposing Chick-fil-A with a tweet saying: ‘Closest #ChickFilA to San Francisco is 40 miles away & I strongly recommend that they not try to come any closer.’

What was Chick-fil-A’s crime that they should be punished and deprived of their rights?  The CEO stated that he believed that marriage was the union between one man and one woman and Chick-fil-A was “caught” having exercised its 1st Amendment right to donate to a pro-family cause that supported that view of marriage.

Fascists hate Chick-fil-A for that.

Liberals have repeatedly claimed that Republicans are hoping the economy is bad so that they can win in November.  But it is LIBERALS who want job destruction and who do not want economic growth.  Can Chick-fil-A create jobs in Boston or Chicago?  Uh-uh, they can’t.  Can Chick-fil-A grow and help the economy grow?  Not if Democrats have anything to do with it, they can’t.

Anti-biblical views.  I brought that up.  What does the Bible say about homosexuality?

Genesis 19:4-5,12-13: Before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, surrounded the house, both young and old, all the people from every quarter; and they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them.” … Then the two men said to Lot, “Whom else have you here? A son-in-law, and your sons, and your daughters, and whomever you have in the city, bring them out of the place; for we are about to destroy this place, because their outcry has become so great before the LORD that the LORD has sent us to destroy it.”

Leviticus 18:22: ‘You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.

Romans 1:18, 22, 25-27:For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. … Professing to be wise, they became fools … Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them.  For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

1 Corinthians 6:9: Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.

Is it okay if Bible-believing politicians and government officials freely persecute anybody who holds an “anti-biblical view”???  I hope every liberal out there is saying, “You’re damn right it’s okay!”  Because otherwise you people are hypocrites.

If any lefty wants to say that’s happened, let’s see it: let’s see the conservative mayor who has said, “Those who hold anti-biblical views discriminate against Christians.  Such people don’t represent what our city stands for and we’re going to punish them with the power of government.”

Just imagine the damn outcry if a conservative mayor punished gay people the way Boston and Chicago attacked a Christian business.  You want to bet that Barack Obama and his attacking lawdog Eric Holder wouldn’t be all over that major like the stink on poop that they already are?

The Chicago Way (i.e., Obama’s way) is a fascist way. Period.

Rahm Emanuel would have much more important things to worry about if he wasn’t such a fool.  But to add abject moral hypocrisy to complete moral idiocy, Rahm Emanuel demonizes Chick-fil-A for intolerance and then invites one of the most rabidly intolerant men and organizations in America into Chicago in the form of Louis Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam.  You don’t get more vile than Louis Farrakhan and you don’t get more vile than close Obama ally Rahm Emanuel.

Quite a few people have praised Chick-fil-A for its business model.  Allow me to criticize it: they ought to shake the filthy dust of Boston and Chicago from their feet and create jobs and build the economy in places that deserve to have jobs and economic growth.

We don’t have a Chick-fil-A in my own area (although locating in the Palm Springs area would be out of the frying pan and into the fire, wouldn’t it?), but if we did I’d be a Chick-fil-A-eating fool to thank them for being one of the few businesses that actually stands for something other than PC or profit.  I used to eat at one in Anaheim and it’s gooooood.

All fascism is is a particular form of SOCIALISM.

Liberals are THE most intolerant people there are.  It doesn’t matter if we’re talking about rank-and-file liberals expressing their opinions online or if it’s elite university academia or whether we’re talking about the field of  journalism that reports our “news” for us.  It is just who they are.  It is their quintessential nature as fascists.  And it would be interesting to explore how many “boycotts” liberals have called for versus conservatives, as yet again liberals document for history that they are rabidly intolerant people who want to force everyone to bow down to their agenda or punish and intimidate them for not doing so.

And as yet another example of liberal fascism, the same damn fascist liberals who are trying to ban Chick-fil-A are doing everything they can to grant more permits for more Islamofascist mosques.  Liberals self-righteously say, “We don’t support or endorse their beliefs or practices but we have a constitutional obligation to support their freedoms.  But Chick-Fil-A fascism proves once for all that it isn’t any “moral principle” of freedom that liberals are standing on.  Because the left would have called for Rahm Emanuel,  Thomas Menino, and all the Democrats and liberals who joined their call for punitive action against Chick-Fil-A to RESIGN if that were the case.  No, rather, vicious terrorists fanatical Muslims are (for obvious reasons to anyone who understands that the left is fascist) the ONLY religious group that liberals stand behind.

Democrats have aborted 54 million human beings in America.  If you compare that number to the total US population today, Democrats have murdered more than one out of every single six Americans they’ve allowed to live.  During the period that Democrats have fanatically imposed Roe v. Wade, the median age in America has soared from 28.4 years old to 37.2 years old.  We’re getting older and older.  And we’ve murdered an entire generation of workers as we’ve gone from having 16 workers paying into the Social Security system for every retiree receiving benefits from it to today when three workers are paying into the system for every retiree receiving benefits.  Americans have aborted their own futures.  And we have a crushing unfunded and unpayable and unsustainable liability of over $211 TRILLION that has been created entirely by Democrat fascists.

If you’re a liberal, you’re a fascist.  And the more liberal you are, the more freaking fascist you are.  The fact that Boston Mayor Thomas Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel are still in office after defecating all over the 1st Amendment is proof of that pudding.

Update, 7/30/12: Just to document that liberals are fascists forever:

ABC’s The View honored Roseanne Barr with a guest-host spot on July 19, which shows they probably aren’t in the habit of evaluating her sanity based on her Twitter rants. Take her wishing cancer on Chick-Fil-A fans this morning: “anyone who eats S–t Fil-A deserves to get the cancer that is sure to come from eating antibiotic filled tortured chickens 4Christ”.

This came after she told the restaurant chain to suck an appendage she doesn’t have.

This outbreak of hate was retweeted by comedian Joe Rogan, who recently hosted a newfangled version of “Fear Factor” on NBC. Shortly after her get-cancer tweet, she doubled down:

“off to grab a s–it fil-A sandwich on my way to worshipping Christ, supporting Aipac and war in Iran.”

Meanwhile, fascist liberals are seeking to forcibly close Chick-Fil-A restraurants at at least two state university campuses:

Here’s a New York Democrat who joins the fascists in using her influence and power as a politician to get the government to attack free speech.

Liberals hate free speech, hate the Constitution, hate human life.  They also hate businesses and jobs and even taxes – given that the one Chicago Chick-Fil-A created 97 jobs and pays taxes.  Now liberals clearly don’t believe in God; but whatever replaces God for them – I suppose it’s ‘Government forbid!’ – that we let in a business that will pay taxes and create jobs.  Again, what they REALLY want is to be able to control everything and reward their friends and punish their enemies and decide who wins and who loses.  That’s the quintessential nature of fascism.

They also hate science.  Because…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Chick-fil-A: Why Do I Keep Calling Liberals Fascist? Because THEY KEEP BEING FASCISTS, That’s Why”

  1. J Says:

    Your already showing fascist tendecies by showing how much being gay is bad. Fascist hate gays. Fascist have far right ideology as they blame the left-wing, use socialist and cmmunist as the reason why everything is falling apart, use religion to justify there actions, etc.

  2. Michael Eden Says:


    I find it amazing and frightening as we enter these last days that there are people like you who literally have deceived yourselves into believing that the people who want to abrogate free speech and punish people from exercising their rights are good people while those who want to exercise their rights are “fascists.” It wasn’t that long ago that the leftist ACLU defended the rights of actual Nazis who marched through a town (Skokie) full of Jewish Holocaust survivors on the grounds that even abhorrent speech should be protected in any free society. Now we have the left demanding that those who merely believe the Bible, which has been the source of Western Civilization and the backbone that shaped America, should be punished by elected politians using the power of government to attack a view of marriage that has endured for all of human history until now.

    I rememembered that I had dealt with the FACT that fascists LOVED gays and Nazis in PARTICULAR loved gays while homosexuals were helping Hitler rise to power. I did a search in my comments in order to avoid doing that research all over again and lo and behold – I had documented that proof along with many others to none other than YOU.

    You don’t CARE what the facts are. You live in a world of fact, truth, and reality free ASSERTIONS. You believe lies and nobody will ever be able to convince you any differently because you don’t interact with or listen to anything BUT lies.

    I noted that I’d blocked you, but your idiotic comment allows me to bring back my refutation of your stupid “fascists hate gays” crap. The whole thing is available here. But here is the relevant portion:

    You want to argue that Nazism was “right-wing”? Fine. As long as it is clear that socialist Nazism was the “right-wing” of the rabid far LEFT.

    I’ll be blocking you simply because there is no point having any kind of rational discussion with someone who relies on THE GENETIC FALLACY as the very heart of their argument.

    Yes, Adolf Hitler said:

    “We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.” — Adolf Hitler, from speech delivered on May 1, 1927

    Yes, I know, you cockroach. If I were only smarter I would know that Hitler’s statement “We are socialists” and “we are enemies of today’s capitalistic system” REALLY means “We are most certainly NOT socialists” and “We truly and sincerely LOVE today’s capitalistic system.” But sadly, I am lacking in the cockroach brain department. It’s clearly my failing.

    Hitler also said, of course, that “we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.” Which leads to the question, “If Hitler was a ‘conservative,’ precisely just what in the hell was he trying to conserve?”

    I’m not going to bother to respond to all of your 19 assertions of fascism/conservatism. I’ll take on your first five as examples of how incredibly piss-poor both your thinking and your complete absence of facts are.

    1. Both want to outlaw what see is immoral like homosexuality

    Your chart topper is something of a joke in light of history and the fact that the SA was blatantly homosexual and Adolf Hitler was FINE with homosexuality until it served his usefulness. The SA that Hitler rode to power was virtually pure homosexual. That is an amply documented fact.

    Another hindrance was the homosexuality of Röhm and other SA leaders such as his deputy Edmund Heines (both of whom would later be sentenced to death on Hitler’s orders).[4][5] In 1931, the Münchener Post, a Social Democratic newspaper, obtained and published Röhm’s letters to a friend in which Röhm discussed his sexual affairs with men.

    By this time, Röhm and Hitler were so close that they addressed each other as du (the German familiar form of “you”). Röhm was the only top Nazi that Hitler addressed as such. In turn, Röhm was the only Nazi who dared address Hitler as “Adolf,” rather than “mein Führer.”[5] […]

    Furthermore, Röhm and his SA colleagues thought of their force (now over three million strong) as the future army of Germany, replacing the Reichswehr and its professional officers. Although Röhm had been a member of the officer corps, he viewed them as “old fogies” who lacked “revolutionary spirit.” In February 1934, Röhm demanded that the Reichswehr (which under the Treaty of Versailles was limited to 100,000 men) be absorbed into the SA under his leadership as Minister of Defence.[6]

    This horrified the army, with its traditions going back to Frederick the Great. The army officer corps viewed the SA as a brawling mob of undisciplined street fighters and were also concerned by the pervasiveness of homosexuality and “corrupt morals” within the ranks of the SA. Further, reports of a huge cache of weapons in the hands of SA members gave the army commanders even more concern.[6] The entire officer corps opposed Röhm’s proposal, insisting that honour and discipline would vanish if the SA gained control. However, it appeared that Röhm and the SA would settle for nothing less. […]

    The purge of the SA was legalized the next day with a one-paragraph decree: the Law Regarding Measures of State Self-Defence. At this time no public reference was made to the alleged SA rebellion; instead there were generalised references to misconduct, perversion, and some sort of plot. John Toland noted that Hitler had long been privately aware that Röhm and his SA associates were homosexuals; although he disapproved of their behaviour, he stated that ‘the SA are a band of warriors and not a moral institution.'[11]

    A few days later, the claim of an incipient SA rebellion was publicised and became the official reason for the entire wave of arrests and executions. Indeed, the affair was labeled the “Röhm-putsch” by German historians, though after World War II it has usually been modified as the “alleged Röhm-putsch” or known as the “Night of the Long Knives.” In a speech on 13 July Hitler alluded to Röhm’s homosexuality and explained the purge as chiefly defence against treason.[12]

    Here’s a couple of more quotes from a History program called “The Gestapo: The Sword Forged” That gets to the cruciality of the [homosexual] SA in the rise of Nazism and the reasons for the purge after they’d lived out their usefulness to Hitler:

    The SA was so out of control that even Hitler’s allies were shocked and dismayed… The SA had served its purpose; Hitler already had envisioned what would be be known as the Gestapo to take ther place… The SA was crucial to the Nazis seizing power. But once the Nazis had seized power, the SA increasingly became an obstacle and an embarrassment. The SA represented the most extreme, violent and radical element of the Nazi Party.

    It’s not enough to say that Hitler and Nazism was fine with homosexuality; in fact, it must be said that without homosexuals and homosexuality you never would have had a Nazi Party rising to power to begin with. Homosexuals and homosexuality was central to the rise of Nazism. There would have BEEN no “Thousand Year Reich” without homosexuals. The Third Reich never would have even got off the ground without homosexual thugs fighting for it in the street brawls and then terrorizing those who might have spoken out into silence in the early years. Hitler rode the SA – rife with homosexuality and 3 million strong – to power. That is a fact. It is a fact that homosexuals were essential to the rise of Nazism. And don’t you dare blame me that they got hung on their own petard by their own ideology that they imposed on Germany.

    One of the things that Veith points out is that Nazism was very much into avant garde art in the early years. Basically, whatever challenged the established order, including open homosexuality, was fine with them – until they took over and themselves BECAME the established order. Then anything that could or would challenge them was ruthlessly suppressed. Philosophers embracing existentialism (Martin Heidegger) and artists embracing expressionism (Gottfried Benn, Emil Nolde) were open Nazis who ended up on the wrong side of the Nazi Party after their destruction of the social order had served its purpose and was no longer useful.


    I’ll go back to page 26 of Modern Fascism, since you literally ILLUSTRATE it’s factual accuracy:

    Part of the problem in recognizing fascism is the assumption that it is conservative. Sternhell has observed how study of the ideology has been obscured by “the official Marxist interpretation of fascism.” Marxism defines fascism as it’s polar opposite. If Marxism is progressive, fascism is conservative. If Marxism is left-wing, fascism is right-wing. If Marxism champions the proletariat, fascism champions the bourgeoisie. If Marxism is socialist, fascism is capitalist.”

    Zeev Sternhell is not a rightwing Christian, btw. He is a Jewish historian which is to say if you hate on him you’ll be acting like the Nazis. Sternhell made the historical observation in his article “Fascist Ideology” which appeared in the scholarly work “Fascism: A Reader’s Guide” [Berkely: University of California Press] on page 316.

    That’s the paragraph immediate before the one I cite in this article:

    “The influence of Marxist scholarship has severely distorted our understanding of fascism. Communism and fascism were rival brands of socialism. Whereas Marxist socialism is predicated on an international class struggle, fascist national socialism promoted a socialism centered in national unity. [And in fact, Both movements were “revolutionary socialist ideologies.” Going on,] Both communists and fascists opposed the bourgeoisie. Both attacked the conservatives. Both were mass movements, which had special appeal for the intelligentsia, students, and artists, as well as workers. Both favored strong centralized governments and rejected the free economy and the ideals of individual liberty. [And finally,] Fascists saw themselves as being neither of the right nor the left. They believed that they constituted a third force synthesizing the best of both extremes” [Gene Edward Veith, Jr., Modern Fascism: Liquidating the Judeo-Christian Worldview, p. 26].

    You foolishly rely upon the genetic fallacy to attempt to de-legitimize Veith, AND THEN YOU PROVE HIM COMPLETELY CORRECT BY DOING EXACTLY WHAT HE SAID YOU WOULD DO. I just got through documenting that you do precisely that in your top four points. You take EXACTLY what YOUR side is doing and then try to deceitfully apply it to the right in what Sternhell referred to as your “official Marxist interpretation of fascism.” You are the POSTER BOY for that trick, dude.

    Again, fascism is NOT capitalist. Hitler SAID it was the ENEMY of capitalism. Hitler also clearly stated that his Nazism was SOCIALISM. The very damn word “NAZI” means “National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party.”

    For what it’s worth, the following article I’ve written explicitly refutes your assertions that Hitler was “right-wing,” that Hitler was in any way a “Christian” or even religious, and that it is somehow us Bible-believing conservatives who are somehow “Darwinist” of any sort.

    So every single thing you said was a full-of-crap lie. The Nazis literally started out as a group of homosexual thugs called the SA. To argue that somehow Nazi fascism was somehow antithetical to homosexuality is a historical laugher of rather grand proportions. Hitler purged the “Gay SA” because they were literally SO fascist and SO Nazi that they were going too far for him to be able to politically deal with the homosexual extremism. Then you said that fascism is right wing. Again, false. Fascism is a rival brand of socialism right along with communism. The FACT is that “Nazi” stands for “National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party” just as “USSR” stands for “Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics.”

    Your statement that “Fascists… use socialist and cmmunist as the reason why everything is falling apart” is actually amazing: you are literally saying that anybody who criticizes socialists or communists must therefore be defined as fascist. Which is just an incredibly fascist thing of you to suggest – and it’s too bad you are far too stupid to appreciate the irony. Joseph Stalin would have been thrilled with useful idiots like you.

    Your statement that Fascists is use religion to justify there actions also something that I have factually destroyed before and pointed out to you: For what it’s worth, the following article I’ve written explicitly refutes your assertions that Hitler was “right-wing,” that Hitler was in any way a “Christian” or even religious, and that it is somehow us Bible-believing conservatives who are somehow “Darwinist” of any sort. In that article, I not only point out how Nazis systematically attacked the Bible and any kind of belief in it, but I also exhaustively document Adolf Hitler’s atheism in statements uttered not just by Adolf Hitler, but by all the very closest members of Hitler’s inner circle.

    From Hitler:

    Hitler described to them that “after difficult inner struggles I had freed myself of my remaining childhood religious conceptions. I feel as refreshed now as a foal on a meadow” (Ernst Helmreich, “The German Churches Under Hitler,” p. 285).


    From Joseph Goebbels’ diary, dated 8 April 1941 (Tue):

    The Fuhrer is a man totally attuned to antiquity. He hates Christianity, because it has crippled all that is noble in humanity. According to Schopenhauer, Christianity and syphilis have made humanity unhappy and unfree. What a difference between the benevolent, smiling Zeus and the pain-wracked, crucified Christ. The ancient peoples’ view of God was also much nobler and more humane than the Christians’. What a difference between a gloomy cathedral and a light, airy ancient temple. He describes life in ancient Rome: clarity, greatness, monumentality. The most wonderful republic in history. We would feel no disappointment, he believes, if we were now suddenly to be transported to this old, eternal city.”

    Goebbels also notes in a diary entry in 1939 a conversation in which Hitler had “expressed his revulsion against Christianity. He wished that the time were ripe for him to be able to openly express that. Christianity had corrupted and infected the entire world of antiquity.” [Elke Frölich. 1997-2008. Die Tagebücher von Joseph Goebbels. Munich: K. G. Sauer. Teil I, v. 6, p. 272].

    Hitler also said, “Our epoch will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity.” [Hitler’s Table Talk, Enigma Books; 3rd edition October 1, 2000, p. 343].

    Author Konrad Heiden quoted Hitler as stating, “We do not want any other god than Germany itself. It is essential to have fanatical faith and hope and love in and for Germany.” [Heiden, Konrad A History of National Socialism, A.A. Knopf, 1935, p. 100].

    That’s barely scratches the surface of all the documented statements that I have in that article that simply proves you are a liar without shame.

    American founding father John Adamns said that “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” But he was a fascist, wasn’t he? And there can be no question on your imbecile view that Father of Our Country George Washington – who said – “Of all the habits and dispositions which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars” – must be a fascist. Because these great men who founded our country “used religion to justify there actions.”

    You are a liar who will always believe lies because fools are immune to facts or reason.

    Now go find somebody else to bother.

  3. Free Market Capitalist Says:

    Roseanne Barr is a sick and disgusting human being. The view is nothing but a cackling-hen convention promoting the demonic liberal agenda. I absolutely hate the view, except when they have guests like Anne Coulter on. One day, people like Roseanne Barr will receive their just reward, an everlasting punishment in the fires of hell. Hers will be a terrible death, mainly because of all the souls she helped lead to perdition. These people are clearly ambassadors for satan. It is sad that so many hold people like Barr in high regard or even listen to the evil spewing from her diseased mouth, which is an open sepulchre, while those that speak Biblical truth are ridiculed, mocked and condemned.

    God clearly states that those who live a homosexual lifestyle will end up in hell. One of the best ways to mock or spit in the face of God is to embrace homosexuality, which is a great perversion, taking the order that God had so magnificently created and turning it upside down. Any rational thinking person should easily understand that man was made for woman and woman for man. A simple biology class will easily explain. However, there are many who are under satan’s spell, either practicing homosexuality or even tolerating it. I am constantly amazed at the number of young people, mainly women, who are homosexuals. In my view, it is becoming an epidemic…..just like in the day’s of Noah…. Many claim that, oh, they were born this way and can’t help it. I believe that everyone is predisposed to some form of sin. In the case of homosexuality, many of the participants have some kind of predisposition to it, I am sure. However, I believe the underlying power of homosexuality is really a spirit, demon spirits, who actively promote all perversions.

    I firmly believe that God will hold even non homosexuals who, like Emanual and his blasphemous ‘Chicago Values’, create an environment that doesn’t condemn the lifestyle as sinful but create opportunity for it to be acceptable, flourish and grow, accountable on the day of judgement. Liberalism is nothing but a demon death cult. I am sure that liberalism originated back in ancient Babylon, during the time when Nimrod was attempting to build the Tower of Babel and a one-world government. Despite God scattering the people and giving different languages, liberalism has never died.

    I wonder how the late comedian George Carlin is doing?

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    I respond to you having read the LA Times this morning and reading Michael Hiltzik’s “contribution” to the hissy fit surrounding Chick-Fil-A.

    His view was that CEO Cathy was essentially claiming to be able to read God’s mind (I believe he charged that Dan Cathy thinks “he has a direct line into God’s medulla oblongata”) in his views toward homosexuality and marrige. Because Hiltzik has apparently never once read the Bible, has absolutely no conception of “Christendom” and the role Christianity and the Bible played in defining Western Europe and in point of fact our own nation America. So this moral jackass is simply too stupid to be aware of the fact that the Bible is filled with prohibitions against homosexuality and no, dumbass, we DON’T have to read God’s mind to understand what marriage is and what it is NOT.

    Progressive companies have a clear right to support progressive issues, but how dare conservatives support their causes, he asserts.

    And there’s this surrounding tone of “why do they hate?” in his entire piece. “Hate” is not the Tea Party, you roach; hate is your Occupy movement and the well over 7,000 arrests and the rapes and the violence and the terrorism we’re seeing pouring out of it. What the left is today are haters who whine about the other side being hateful because hypocrisy is their quintessential defining essence such that one cannot even possibly be a liberal today without being a hypocrite.

    At one point Hiltzik says, “traditional marriage, whatever that is.” Because the man is simply that stunningly stupid. “Whatever that is”, dumbass? It’s the entirity of human history up to this point that marriage is the union between one man and one woman. That’s what it is.

    Hiltzik trumpets that courts and legislatures all around the country have legalized gay marriage, without bothering to mention the fact that EVERY SINGLE TIME this issue has gone before the voters, even in his own California and even in liberal Hawaii, THE PEOPLE have supported Chick-Fil-A’s understanding of marriage.

    Thank God, crowds are lining up by the hundreds to literally stand outside and wait for a chance to eat at Chick-Fil-A.

    Chicago isn’t welcome here.

  5. Anonymous Says:

    The Bible is fictional. The only reason right wingers constantly bring it up is because it’s an excuse to spew hatred.

    There is NO room for Religion in politics. The only reason gays don’t have a federal right to get married is because of far right nutjobs that thump the Bible every chance they get.

    Might as well bring slavery back too. God condones that as well….

    -Libertarian Atheist

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    The Bible is fictional. The only reason right wingers constantly bring it up is because it’s an excuse to spew hatred.


    Your brain is fictional. The only reason liberals pretend they have them is because it’s an excuse to pretend they’re not complete dumbasses.

    There is NO room for Religion in politics, you say. What is fascinating about that is that 1) that itself is a religious statement (from your religion of state atheist communism) and 2) it is directly in contradiction to the founding fathers who wrote things like, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” It is because you qualify for 1) above that you ignore the wisdom of the founding fathers of this country and thus hate the spirit of America.

    Actually, dumbass – here’s the problem with you being a brainless idiot again – it was CHRISTIANS who ended slavery, and interestingly, you fool, it was REPUBLICAN Christians who ended slavery while you vile DEMOCRATS fought a vicious Civl War to keep slavery and then created the Ku Klux Klan as the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party to persecute black people AND REPUBLICANS.

    If you actually bothered to READ the Bible, you’d know that God severely regulated the treatment to slaves under Mosaic law to demand they be given good treatment. And you’d know that the laws of Jubilee freed every slave. You’d also have read St. Paul’s letter in Philemon and found the very first treatise toward dignifying and freeing the slaves. If you ever bothered to learn history, you’d see that slavery was ended in Britain as a result of the work of Christian William Wilberforce, and that the Republican North largely fought the Civil War that freed the slaves on religious grounds.

    You liberals being “talking point morons,” I of course have already been presented with idiocy exactly like yours and dealt with it here:

    The Bible NEVER says that slavery is a good thing. It was the way the world AFTER THE FALL worked, and God allowed it even as He regulted it. As an example, no one was truly a “slave” in Israel, because no one could be “owned” for more than fifty years (Jubiliee):

    “This fiftieth year is sacred—it is a time of freedom and of celebration when everyone will receive back their original property, and slaves will return home to their families.” — Leviticus 25:10

    For Jews, no one could be a “slave” longer than SEVEN years:

    If your brother, a Hebrew man or a Hebrew woman, is sold to you, he shall serve you six years, and in the seventh year you shall let him go free from you. – Deuteronomy 15:12

    So with respect, even in the Old Testament, you have a limitation on slavery.

    Can you find me one single place in the Old Testament where the sin of homosexuality is lessened the way slavery is regulated and limited??? You won’t be able to, but go ahead and knock yourself out looking.

    If you read the Book of Philemon, we go to the very razor’s edge of abolishing slavery completely. Paul very clearly teaches Philemon to free his slave. And history records that Philemon obeyed Paul and freed Onesimus.

    What did the Paul who wrote about slavery in Philemon have to say about homosexuality? Read up on that, too. It aint good for your side.

    In Matthew 19:8, Jesus said the following about divorce: “Jesus replied, ‘Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning.'” It was NEVER that God said divorce was okay; it was ALWAYS that God allowed sinful man after the fall to do what being sinful necessitated that they do.

    History also records that it was in fact Christians who abolished slavery in Christian Europe. When Britain abolished slavery, its most powerful navy on earth had the power to influence the abolition of slavery everywhere it influenced. And history is crystal clear that it was CHRISTIANS culminating in William Wilburforce who abolished slavery.

    Again, the same Christianity that ended slavery is the same Christianity that condemns homosexuality. And the fact that they displayed their righteousness – even by YOUR standards – in ending slavery ought to therefore be proof that these righteous people are right in condemning slavery.

    Look, if your argument is that since slavery was once accepted and now it is banned and therefore EVERYTHING that was NOT accepted ought to be tolerated, such as rape, murder, torture, etc., then that’s one thing. Otherwise, slavery and homosexuality have nothing whatsoever to do with each other to begin with, and you might as well be arguing that we should embrace child molestation now because of what happened with slavery.

    Homosexuality is morally wrong. The Bible is very clear on that. Being a slave was NEVER condemend as morally wrong in the Bible. Your analogy is not even apples to oranges; it is boulders to rocket ships. Slavery and homosexuality have nothing to do with each other.

    So your ridiculing of the Bible, of Christianity, and of Republicans only makes you look like a despicable fool. It was Christians who had the moral foundation to put an end to slavery; whereas vile roaches like YOU have put people in the most shocking and most abject human bondage over and over again every single time YOUR state atheist system has EVER been tried whether it be Stalinist Russia or Maoist China or Pol Pot’s Cambodia or Kim Jong Il’s North Korea or wherever fools like you ruled God out and big government socialism in.

    By the way, given that in reality Obama thinks EXACTLY like you do, I wish he had the ingegrity to actually come right out and say it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: