Marxist – Yes, I Said MARXIST – Obama Demands We ‘Go Forward Towards A New Vision Of An America In Which Prosperity Is Shared’

For the record, any liberal who comments to this will be immediately confronted with my demand that he or she share their prosperity with me.

It’s the least you can do to not be an abject hypocrite weasel, after all.

Monday, August 13, 2012
Truly Terrifying Quote o’ the Day

No additional setup is required:

Obama: “A New Vision Of An America In Which Prosperity Is Shared”

“Too many folks still don’t have a sense that tomorrow will be better than today. And so, the question in this election is which way do we go?” President Obama asked at a fundraiser in Chicago on Sunday.

Do we go forward towards a new vision of an America in which prosperity is shared?” Obama asked. “Or do we go backward to the same policies that got us in the mess in the first place?”

“I believe we have to go forward,” Obama said. “I believe we have to keep working to create an America where no matter who you are, no matter what you look like, no matter where you come from, no matter what your last name is, no matter who you love, you can make it here if you try. That’s what’s at stake in November. That’s what is why I am running for a second term as president of the United States of America.”

“Shared prosperity” is collectivism. Statism. Marxism. It means taking from those who produce goods and services to fund those who don’t, which is certainly outside any legitimate function of government under the United States Constitution.

I wouldn’t be all that concerned except… collectivism has failed every time it’s ever been tried in all of human history, from Plato’s Republic to the Soviet Union. It leads to despotism and tyranny, as surely as night follows day.

Hat tip: BadBlue News Service.

Just remember, “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that.”  That’s why Obama can take your profits that ought to be going to your family and your children and redistribute them to somebody who will vote for him.

Obama has said we need to “spread the wealth around.”  If you listen to the man talk, I defy you to explain to me how Barry Hussein could possibly refute the central economic statement of Marxism:

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” – Karl Marx

Obama IS a Marxist.  That is simply a fact of understanding what words mean.

Another thing is that while Obama says, ” I am my brother’s keeper, I am my sister’s keeper,” this very same hypocrite who mouths those words is literally allowing his OWN BROTHER to suffer in squalor.  And the demonstrable truth is that Obama DOESN’T care about his brother; all he cares about is accumulating the same sort of raw government power over a people that Marxists have ALWAYS sought to accumulate.  This man who cares NOTHING about his very own brother while saying, “I am my brother’s keeper” for mass consumption wants his liberal ideology and his Democrat Party to be able to decide who wins and who loses, to be able to dictate who is rewarded and who is punished.  That’s all he cares about.  And if he can drag America across that threshold that is all she wrote.

But let’s get beneath even that level: Obama says, “I am my brother’s keeper.”  And that’s fine as long as it is Obama deciding as an individual to do more for his brother (which in fact he has refused to do).  But what Obama then does is a bait-and-switch: he says, “I am my brother’s keeper because I am going to force YOU to pay for my keeping of my brother.”  Understand that while Obama demands the erection of a Marxist-style State that seizes the wealth of others and redistributes it according to political ideology, Obama himself gave less than 1 percent of his own wealth to charity before he announced he was going to run for president.

“I am my brother’s keeper” is a statement of an individual INDIVIDUALLY accepting responsibility out of his own or her own wealth and making the CHOICE to give.  But Obama cynically and deceitfully uses the phrase to try to justify a big government State that directly attacks the very religious system that he uses to justify his powergrab: Barack Obama is responsible for 54.5 million abortions in America since 1973; Barack Obama is responsible for the attack on biblical marriage; Barack Obama is imposing something the Bible literally calls an “abomination” onto society; Barack Obama is at war with the Catholic Church.

The same cynical, dishonest man who mocks the Bible proceeds to use it to justify his government takeover and his confiscation of the money that people worked hard to EARN:

If we’re not supposed to use the Bible to justify government policy, then why the hell did you do it, Barry Hussein???  But of course what you do is exploit the Bible whenever it is convenient for YOU while denouncing anyone who uses the Bible as that Bible actually teaches.

For the record, North Korea is dark at night – as in dark the way it was in the damn STONE AGE – because its people bought this same sort of crap that Obama is blathering.

Tags: , , , , ,

9 Responses to “Marxist – Yes, I Said MARXIST – Obama Demands We ‘Go Forward Towards A New Vision Of An America In Which Prosperity Is Shared’”

  1. sklcolorado Says:

    Years ago I believed certain people were Marxist, but I hadn’t read Marx. So, a couple years back I read a bunch of Marx’s writings, e.g. Grundrisse, The German Ideoloy, etc.and Wow, the lights turned on. Once you’ve read his work it’s easy to spot a Marxist so, I shake my head and laugh when people deny Obama is a Marxist or socialist.The problem is that they themselves hold those principles and don’t realize that they are socialists or Maxists just like the president. So, assuming they’re being honest, it’s really just ignorance. It’s a similar situation with the Fed. People just assume that “stuff” is supposed to go up in price each year never realizing that our central bank is mandated to devalue our currency, hence create inflation every year. Until, the public wants to understand socialism and it’s result or even the Fed for that matter, it is nearly impossible to have a civil discussion much less a debate of ideas.

  2. Michael Eden Says:


    You are right on, and thank you for adding an intellectual foundation for the topic of liberalism and Marxism.

    I have frequently put it in these terms. I ask people to consider the central statement of economic Marxism –

    From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” – Karl Marx

    – and then demand liberals explain to me how liberalism is not virtually identical to Marxism. More specificially, since we’re talking about Obama in particular, explain to me how Barack Obama would repudiate this central statement of economic Marxism as stated by the leading proponent of Marxism himself. I have issued this challenge fifty times, and I have NEVER heard a word back.

    When you understand what Marxism truly is, it is a no-brainer to see Marxism’s “BARELY prettier sister” in liberalism.

    And the only thing that keeps liberalism from becoming full-fledged UGLY is power. Liberals understand they have to lie about their true intentions in order to win enough votes to seize power once and for all.

  3. Barbara Mahan Says:

    Let’s hope the movie 2016 will help expose this maniac in the White House…! God help us if he gets 4 more years.

    Let’s see if George Clooney and the Hollywood gang will hand over their millions to “distribute” the wealth. What a hypocrite, the very people who are helping the annointed one are part of the 1% are they not?

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    Barbara Mahan,

    Hollywood liberal hypocrites are actually the MOST hypocritical slimeballs of all. They demand the very kinds of tax breaks and tax incentives that they demand the rest of us not be able to get from cities where they shoot films. They have frequently had strikes with their underpaid underlyings, etc. And then of course how many of these damn celebrities who think the REST of us should pay skyhigh taxes DON’T PAY THEIR TAXES???

    But hypocrites and liars love their own, which is why the most hypocritical group of liars on earth will back Obama.

    I actually haven’t yet seen 2016, but I’m a huge fan of Dinesh D’Souza and understand the basic point from a D’Souza article. That article pointed out that Obama’s book was not titled, “Dreams OF My Father,” but rather “Dreams FROM My Father” – i.e., Obama Jr. is getting his dreams directly from Obama Sr. And what WERE Obama Sr’s dreams? Well, the man was a Marxist who utterly despised the West out out of anti-colonialist and racist presuppositions. And Obama Jr. (our Barry Hussein) is literally ackowledging that he is sharing the Marxist, anti-Western, anti-American, racist views of his daddy. And Obama’s ENTIRE LIFE STORY is one episode of that after another.

  5. Barbara Mahan Says:

    I don’t think his father was really in his life all that much but his grandfather and Frank Marshall Davis ( a card carrying communist) were both his mentors. In that book Dreams From My Father he spoke of Frank many times but never disclosed Frank’s last name…wonder why???
    His agenda is to kill everything America stands for, and I’m just a little ole lady who never thought much about politics or government till now. If he steals this election which I believe he will try,( he seems to get away with everything he does) my grandchildren will grow up in a world we can only imagine. If you ever read the bullets of the Marxist-Leninist philosophy, he scores on every single one. It’s amazing to me that people on the left support this man…it’s as if their eyes and ears have been closed…perhaps divinely. If God is punishing us and trying to wake us up, He has my full attention…this man has got to go. I would vote for Mickey Mouse over him.

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    Barbara Mahan,

    It is biblical, literally biblical:

    “Should you help the wicked and love those who hate the LORD? Because of this, wrath has gone out against you from the LORD” – 2 Chronicles 19:2

    A wise man’s heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man’s heart directs him toward the left. — Ecclesiastes 10:2

    You love evil more than good, Falsehood more than speaking what is right. — Psalm 52:3

    But he who sins against Me injures himself; all those who hate Me love death — Proverbs 8:36

    Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! — Isaiah 5:20

    You who hate good and love evil, Who tear off their skin from them And their flesh from their bones — Micah 3:2

    Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools – Romans 1:22

    For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all the ungodliness and wickedness of those who in their wickedness suppress the truth – Romans 1:18

    In their case, the god of this world has blinded the minds of those who do not believe to keep them from seeing the light of the glorious gospel of the Messiah, who is the image of God. — 2 Corinthians 4:4

    Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron — 1 Timothy 4:2

    For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. — 2 Tim 4:3-4

  7. Barbara Mahan Says:

    Wow! I’m gonna print these verses out and put em on my fridg. Read the Harbinger if you haven’t already, that is a mind blower also. God is surely speaking..I’m so glad I found this site. Bless you for speaking truth, we all need to start speaking the truth no matter the cost. And there surely will be one.

  8. Uncle Samman Says:

    The “author” of this run-amok blog posting obviously has no concept of Marx’s writing, how they might apply to a given person, entity, or situation, or the history of the two major political parties as they relate to social class.

  9. Michael Eden Says:

    Uncle Samman,

    Given that you “have such a concept” of Marx’s writing, kindly explain how Barack Obama would refute this central thesis of economic Marxism:

    From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” – Karl Marx

    Take as many words as you would like to show how Barack Obama has never stood for this and never will stand for this redistribution of wealth.

    Otherwise get your arrogant hoity-toity pseudo-intellectual bovine feces out of my face and off my blog. Because I don’t have time for snooty idiots who wave their hands dismissively without bothering to offer A DAMN THING to even TRY to show how they’re right and the person whom they’re dismissively waving their hand at is wrong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: