Mitt Romney is heavily winning the middle class vote. Which might just be why Obama is working so hard to destroy the middle class.
Given all the demonization of Mitt Romney as a greedy rich bastard who would attack the middle class by Obama and his roaches and the Democrat Party and all their roaches and the mainstream media (who are pretty much all roaches), this is actually pretty amazing; but Mitt Romney utterly ANNIHILATES Barack Obama with the middle class vote.
The money portions of the following article:
The past several weeks have been filled with news stories, editorials and columns heaping criticism on the tactics and strategy of the Romney campaign. Many of these opinion pieces even suggested that Romney’s only hope for winning is to make substantial changes to his campaign. Much of this analysis is based on the premise that Romney is out of touch and has not been making an affirmative case to middle-class voters. His comments at a private fundraiser in May were pointed to as an illustration that he could never identify with and win the support of many middle-class voters. We took a special look at middle-class voters, and middle-class families in particular, in this latest POLITICO-George Washington University Battleground Poll and found that not to be the case. In fact, on every measure it is Romney who is winning the battle for the support of middle-class families.
[…]
In our latest POLITICO-George Washington University Battleground Poll with middle-class families, which comprise about 54 percent of the total American electorate and usually split in their vote behavior between Republicans and Democrats, Romney holds a 14-point advantage (55 percent to 41 percent). Middle-class families are more inclined to believe the country is on the wrong track (34 percent right direction, 62 percent wrong track), are more likely to hold an unfavorable view of Obama (48 percent favorable, 51 percent unfavorable), and hold a more favorable view of Romney (51 percent favorable, 44 percent unfavorable) and Paul Ryan (46 percent favorable, 35 percent unfavorable) than the overall electorate. These middle-class families also hold a majority disapproval rating on the job Obama is doing as president (45 percent approve, 54 percent disapprove), and turn even more negative toward Obama on specific areas; the economy 56 percent disapprove; spending 61 percent disapprove; taxes, 53 percent disapprove; Medicare 48 percent disapprove; and even foreign policy 50 percent disapprove.
Who speaks for the middle class? It is Mitt Romney and it is very much NOT Barack Obama.
And that pretty much utterly destroys most of the Obama campaign and Democrat Party and mainstream media talking points (which for the record are pretty much lies).
Republican poll analysis: Romney winning with middle-class families
By: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber
September 24, 2012 04:34 AM EDTIn early August, with our Republican analysis of the POLITICO-George Washington University Battleground Poll, we wrote “… this election will remain close until the final weeks of the campaign. There will be ups and downs for both campaigns throughout the next 13 weeks, but the basic dynamics that are driving this electorate and framing this election remain well in place.” Two conventions, and tens of millions of campaign dollars later, we continue to hold that belief. While there have been dozens of polls released during the past six weeks that have had Mitt Romney up by as much as 4 points and Barack Obama up by as much 8 or 9, those variations have had more to do with sampling variations than with real movement in the campaign.
Yes, there have been gaffes on both sides that have been the focus of both the news media and opposing campaigns, but the dynamics that have been the real drivers of the campaign, the economy and deeply negative feelings about the direction of the country, have not changed. There have also been negative stories about the internal operations, messaging and strategy of both presidential campaigns. In August, leading into the Republican convention, there were multiple stories about the Obama campaign operation and internal fights about both message and strategic direction that led one to believe the wheels were coming off. Now it is the Romney campaign’s turn.
(Also on POLITICO: Sheldon Adelson: Inside the mind of the mega-donor)
The past several weeks have been filled with news stories, editorials and columns heaping criticism on the tactics and strategy of the Romney campaign. Many of these opinion pieces even suggested that Romney’s only hope for winning is to make substantial changes to his campaign. Much of this analysis is based on the premise that Romney is out of touch and has not been making an affirmative case to middle-class voters. His comments at a private fundraiser in May were pointed to as an illustration that he could never identify with and win the support of many middle-class voters. We took a special look at middle-class voters, and middle-class families in particular, in this latest POLITICO-George Washington University Battleground Poll and found that not to be the case. In fact, on every measure it is Romney who is winning the battle for the support of middle-class families.
Overall, Obama leads Romney by just 3 points on the ballot (50 percent to 47 percent) – which before we rounded up, is actually a 2.6 point lead and only up a half-a-percentage point from the 2.1 point lead for Obama in our last Battleground poll in early August. In our latest POLITICO-George Washington University Battleground Poll with middle-class families, which comprise about 54 percent of the total American electorate and usually split in their vote behavior between Republicans and Democrats, Romney holds a 14-point advantage (55 percent to 41 percent). Middle-class families are more inclined to believe the country is on the wrong track (34 percent right direction, 62 percent wrong track), are more likely to hold an unfavorable view of Obama (48 percent favorable, 51 percent unfavorable), and hold a more favorable view of Romney (51 percent favorable, 44 percent unfavorable) and Paul Ryan (46 percent favorable, 35 percent unfavorable) than the overall electorate. These middle-class families also hold a majority disapproval rating on the job Obama is doing as president (45 percent approve, 54 percent disapprove), and turn even more negative toward Obama on specific areas; the economy 56 percent disapprove; spending 61 percent disapprove; taxes, 53 percent disapprove; Medicare 48 percent disapprove; and even foreign policy 50 percent disapprove.
(Also on POLITICO: Mitt: Fundraising focus Obama’s fault)
All of this data make clear that Romney has won the strong support of middle-class families and is leading the president on an overwhelming majority of key measurements beyond just the ballot. In fact, when respondents were asked who, Obama or Romney, would best handle a variety of issues, Romney led on all but one including the economy (+9 percent), foreign policy (+3 percent), spending (+15 percent), taxes (+7 percent), Medicare (+2 percent), and jobs (+10 percent). Ironically, the one measurement Obama led Romney on was “standing up for the middle class” (+8 Obama), reinforcing that often the Democrats win the message war with the middle class, but not their hearts and souls.
Looking at this presidential election overall, intensity among voters is high with Republicans, Democrats, and now independents, and is at levels more comparable with the final days of a presidential election than six weeks out from Election Day. In fact, fully 80 percent of voters now say that they are extremely likely to vote. Even with the past few weeks containing some of the toughest days of earned media for the Romney campaign, and perhaps as a surprise to Washington insiders, Romney continues to win Republicans (Romney by a net +87 percent) by the same margin Obama is winning with Democrats (Obama by a net +88 percent), and is still winning with independents (+2 percent). Romney has majority support with voters over the age of 45 (+7 percent), with men (+6 percent), with white women (+9 percent), and with married voters (+14 percent). In addition, Romney has solidified his base. Support among conservative voters exceeds 70 percent (73 percent), his support among very conservative voters exceeds 80 percent (83 percent), and his support among Republicans exceeds 90 percent (91 percent). Romney is also receiving a higher level of support among Hispanics (40 percent), which is driven by higher support from Hispanic men.
(PHOTOS: 13 who won’t quit Mitt)
Democratic pollster Celinda Lake has often made the point that Democratic voters are becoming more secular and Republicans more faith based. That certainly appears to be holding up in this election. Digging a little deeper on the presidential ballot, Romney has majority support (51 percent) among Catholics, which in past presidential elections has been one of the most predictive demographic groups of the eventual outcome. Even further, Romney is a winning majority across all religions amongst those who attend services at least weekly (59 percent) or monthly (52 percent), while Obama is winning among those who attend less frequently, never, or are nonbelievers.(PHOTOS: Romney through the years)
For most voters, however, this election is still about pocketbook issues. Fully 66 percent of voters select a pocketbook issue as their top concern. The Romney camp should feel good going into the three presidential debates knowing he has majority support (Romney 53 percent/Obama 44 percent) from these economically focused voters.
In fact, even with all of the misleading partisan attacks on the proposals from Ryan to reform Medicare, a majority of seniors (61 percent) select a pocketbook issue and not Medicare as their top issue of concern and nearly 6 in 10 seniors (58 percent) are voting for the Romney-Ryan ticket.
In addition to their high level of intensity about casting a ballot, many voters are already notably engaged in the campaign. A strong majority of voters (60 percent) say they watched both the Republican and the Democratic national conventions. The ballot among these highly attentive voters is tied with 3 percent undecided. The conventions took a race that was a statistical tie, and simply drove up the vote intensity of all voters. At the same time, there are enough undecided and soft voters remaining for either candidate to win. In fact, even at this stage of the campaign, 13 percent of those making a choice on the presidential ballot indicate that they would consider voting for the other candidate.
A significant number of voters report that the upcoming presidential and vice presidential debates will be extremely (11 percent) or very (12 percent) important to their vote decision. (Twenty-six percent of Obama’s supporters currently place this high level of importance on the debates as does 20 percent of Romney supporters.) This means the debates are one of the best opportunities available for Romney to take votes from Obama. If Romney can continue to make a solid case about turning around the economy and the direction of the country in contrast to the president’s failed economic policies, these voters will be watching and many of them are currently Obama supporters.
Presidential reelection races are almost always about the incumbent and whether or not they should be given an additional four years in office. This race looks to be no different. There is no sign of any good economic news on the horizon and two-thirds of the American electorate is focused on pocketbook issues as their top concern. Fifty-seven percent of these voters disapprove of the job the president is doing on the economy, 62 percent disapprove in his handling of the budget and federal spending, and 54 percent believe that Romney would be better at job creation. Yes, Romney has the issue advantage with these pocketbook-focused voters, and is winning their support by 53 percent to Obama’s 44 percent.
More important, in this latest set of data in the POLITICO-George Washington University Battleground Poll, is the fact that Romney is also winning by a strong 14-point margin over Obama with middle-class families, a group of voters that is not only a majority of the American electorate, but is usually seen as the ultimate target group in any presidential election.
Romney has particularly been demonized by the axis of evil (Obama camp, Democrat Party and mainstream media) over his “47%” quote.
Romney was obviously trying to simplify something that is more complex and committed the sin of oversimplifying. The Obama who can do no wrong with the mainstream media can get away with a thousand of those, but Romney can count on the media “reminding” voters of that remark at least 20 times a day every single day until the election. Basically, there are obviously two groups who will vote heavily for Obama: the lazy class and the elite class.
Hollywood is so massively in Obama’s corner you’re going to be seeing desperate appeals supporting ObamaCare even in primetime network dramas. And what is Hollywood? It’s a bunch of greedy liberal hypocrites who make buttloads of money while pursuing tax credits for the richest people ( hiring lobbyists to do it, btw) and outsourcing to foreign countries so they can make even MORE money. Uberliberal Michael Moore is a particularly loathsome specimin of Hollywood hypocrite, for the record.
They’re rich. They pay taxes (well, some of them do, excluding the ones like Marc Anthony who most fervently support Obama while thinking they’re above paying taxes). Just like some of Obama’s staff actually stoop to pay the taxes they owe.
And then there are all the lazy little low class bottom feeders who do exactly what Mitt Romney said they do.
And the axis of evil deliberately misrepresented that “47 percent” statement to try to demonize Romney with the middle class.
But apparently a whopping majority of the middle class know full damn well who the malicious deceitful hypocrites Obama, Democrats and their media propagandists are.
There are a lot of despicable people undermining the once great and powerful America. But by a wide margin – and completely contrary to the false narratives the Democrats and their media allies keep telling us – the middle class are not among them.
That fact makes me feel better about the American people than I have felt for quite a while.
Just yesterday, I documented how pathologically dishonest the mainstream media are in a microcosm with their blatant overestimation of how many people showed up at an Obama event. That same day I also documented that Obama has destroyed 4 million jobs and gutted labor participation in America. And if that wasn’t enough, I also documented how truly un-American Obama is with this “Obama States of America flag” garbage.
That’s why NOBODY in the middle class ought to be voting for Obama.
Tags: 14 points, 47 percent, 55 percent to 41 percent, Barack Obama, country is on the wrong track, middle-class, middle-class families, Mitt Romney
September 25, 2012 at 7:55 pm
I think most of the polls out there are biased towards Obama and don’t reflect the true sentiment. However, I think the race will still be a close one. Romney should win in a landslide; however, there are a many,many ignorant people out there. I live in Northwest Ohio, where, unfortunately, the union mentality dominates. These people are liberal, democrat zombies and no amount of reason will sway them. I have argued with many of them. With history as a guide, Romney has to get Ohio! I hope you are right in that Romney is winning the middle class vote.
Although my biggest fear is another Obama term, another fear that I have is that Obama, in his first term, may have done too much damage and pushed us over the cliff. Even if Romney is elected, he may not be able to stop the collapse – it may be too late. If this is true, then Romney and the Republicans will surely get the blame, as the lame-stream media will definitely see to it, and in the end liberals win anyway. Such an outcome would surely bring about the totalitarian state that scum-bag liberals dream about with the anti-christ not far off.
September 25, 2012 at 9:16 pm
FMC,
Something I have pointed out over and over on this blog: “The beast is coming.”
America has been the greatest nation in the history of the world. But there seems to come a point in the life of most great nations in which a majority of the people choose national suicide. And there is simply no talking them out of it. When you consider what the German and the Russian people chose and continued to choose no matter what the consequences were, you get the idea.
There is ONE thing that unifies all of the bad people of every nation on earth throughout history that chose the path of suicide: all bad people prefer lies to the truth. When a majority of the people hate the truth and demand to live on lies, that nation will poison itself and bring about a terrible and tragic disaster on themselves in very short order.
Is America at that point? We’ll find out on November 6.
Another interesting thing: since 1789 (the French Revolution which brought about the Reign of Terror), without a single exception, every single nation that has chosen its own destruction has done so through SOCIALISM. Every single one.
I believe Romney will win; I believe like you do that the pollsters are trying harder to create a self-fulfilling prophecy that pushes Obama than they are to reflect reality. But six weeks is an eternity in political campaigns.
I also agree with you that Obama may already have fatally injured America – particularly if the Democrats are able to prevent Romney and the GOP from stopping “Taxmaggedon” and crap like that. Between Obama’s insane spending (particularly when based on his spending relative to the GDP which makes it TRULY shocking) and the Fed’s monetizing the debt to foster even MORE debt by devaluing our currency, we are in one deep hellhole.
And a waffling RINO as Mitt Romney has historically been won’t be able to lift or pull America out of that hellhole.
Which is why I am planning on getting out of political blogging after this election and instead focusing my efforts to warn the ears that will hear about the last days regardless of who wins in November.
I’m pretty sure I said it before this, but here’s me stating that to a liberal turd back in April. I said:
Your scenario may well be exactly what happens: Obama’s “Cloward and Piven” collapse is coming, and there won’t be any way to prevent it. And of course the same mainstream media that continued to blame Bush for all four years of Obama’s failed presidency will IMMEDIATELY blame Romney because at their cores they are dishonest liberal ideologue propagandists.
It’s an interesting question: why does the world worship the Antichrist as Revelation prophesies??? And the answer is in Revelation 6: there will be a terrifying global implosion featuring economic collapse, famine, plague, disease, mass starvation capped by terrifying wars. And into this hopeless calamity (that Obama will have done much to create) will ride in the Antichrist on his white horse to save the day. He will seem to have the answers for everything. And at first it will seem like he is able to pull the world back from the brink. He will be so praised that he will be worshiped not just like a god but like God Himself. And just as all false messiahs, he will create a literal hell on earth as Revelation taught 2,000 years ago.
Update, I just saw that I actually said much the same thing to you about getting out of political blogging after this election back in early August.