Joe Biden Mocked Iran’s Growing Nuclear Capability In Debate: Because He’s A Fool And Ignorantly Mocks Just Like The Fool He Is

Joe Biden mocked a lot of things in his debate Thursday night.  He mocked Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney, of course.  But he also began to grin like the village idiot pretty much every time Paul Ryan began an answer, as if to point out that the world’s most intolerant lunatics can’t emotionally handle a different opinion in any way, shape or form.

Psychologist and brilliant political commentator Charles Krauthammer said that Joe Biden’s debate preparation clearly consisted in watching the movie “The Shining”:

And it’s a classic comparison: I don’t know how Jack Torrance (Nicholson’s character in the movie) would have debated any differently than Biden if he wasn’t allowed to take his axe to the debate.  In fact, I’ll bet Jack Torrance would have been slightly more polite than Joe Biden, and refrained from interrupting Paul Ryan 85 times the way Biden did.

CNN (which for the record declared Ryan the winner in their polling by a 48 percent to 44 percent margin) had an interesting find that was somewhat surprising: it said that women thought that Paul Ryan had won the debate by a larger measure than men did – which is exactly the opposite that one would expect given that women are considerably more likely to vote Democrat than men.

I have a feeling that many women put themselves in Paul Ryan’s shoes and saw Joe Biden as an overbearing, domineering, patronizing rat bastard who would mock them and denigrate them and smirk while a woman was talking so that everybody would know he thought she was an idiot.  And they didn’t like it.  And that debate performance may hurt Obama more than a lot of people realize right now for the very reason that it emotionally turned off the very women voters that Obama is most counting upon.

A female Republican pollster on Huckabee’s program pointed out that Obama and Biden actually depicted the two kinds of men women most loathe: Obama as the passive, uncaring, uninvolved man who couldn’t even generate the emotional energy to manufacture a little bit of eye contact; and Biden as the overbearing, loutish, patronizing, dismissive blowhard.

That said, one of the things that Joe Biden mocked was Iran getting a nuclear weapon.  It was frankly amazing how dismissive he was of what pretty much every expert in the field says is a frighteningly real possibility.

But those who dismiss Iran’s capability are as stupid as those who dismiss their resolve.

Let me give you a very real example as reported by the extremely überleftist Daily Kos:

The Christian Science Monitor reports that an Iranian engineer has told a reported what we suspected:  That they hijacked the drone and fooled it into landing in Iran.  The fact that it landed intact seemed suspicious.  But how could they have defeated the super power that spends more on it’s military than the rest of the world combined?

Simple:  They jammed the control signals forcing it into autopilot mode, then overrode the GPS signals to fool it into landing in Iran.

Iranian electronic warfare specialists were able to cut off communications links of the American bat-wing RQ-170 Sentinel, says the engineer, who works for one of many Iranian military and civilian teams currently trying to unravel the drone’s stealth and intelligence secrets, and who could not be named for his safety.Using knowledge gleaned from previous downed American drones and a technique proudly claimed by Iranian commanders in September, the Iranian specialists then reconfigured the drone’s GPS coordinates to make it land in Iran at what the drone thought was its actual home base in Afghanistan.

Read all about it here.

The article goes on to say that the US will continue to fly over Iran.  But based on this information it seems likely that future flights will meet a similar fate.

This seems like a huge vulnerability.  Makes one wonder if a big chunk of our military budget has been wasted.

What you need to understand is the Obama administration talking heads and the intelligence and military brass that serve at Obama’s pleasure basically said at the time Obama lost one of his drones over Iran that there was no way in hell Iran had the capability to comandeer a drone and the thing must have crash landed.

They also dismissively said this:

US officials skeptical of Iran’s capabilities blame a malfunction, but so far can’t explain how Iran acquired the drone intact. One American analyst ridiculed Iran’s capability, telling Defense News that the loss was “like dropping a Ferrari into an ox-cart technology culture.”

Yet Iran’s claims to the contrary resonate more in light of new details about how it brought down the drone – and other markers that signal growing electronic expertise.

A former senior Iranian official who asked not to be named said: “There are a lot of human resources in Iran…. Iran is not like Pakistan.”

“Technologically, our distance from the Americans, the Zionists, and other advanced countries is not so far to make the downing of this plane seem like a dream for us … but it could be amazing for others,” deputy IRGC commander Gen. Hossein Salami said this week.

According to a European intelligence source, Iran shocked Western intelligence agencies in a previously unreported incident that took place sometime in the past two years, when it managed to “blind” a CIA spy satellite by “aiming a laser burst quite accurately.”

More recently, Iran was able to hack Google security certificates, says the engineer. In September, the Google accounts of 300,000 Iranians were made accessible by hackers. The targeted company said “circumstantial evidence” pointed to a “state-driven attack” coming from Iran, meant to snoop on users.

Well, guess what that “ox-cart technology culture” did with the Ferrari Obama gave them?

They reverse-engineered it and built their own model so successfully that it overflew most of Israel (via their proxy puppet Hezbollah) and netted themselves all kinds of photographic intelligence (most useful for target acquisition) with it.  When Israel shot it down they discovered that it was built with stealth technology – which was why it had been able to penetrate Israel’s defenses.

Now, if you are a complete and abject fool the way Joe Biden and Barack Obama are complete abject fools, then you will keep dreaming your naive fool’s dream that Iran is a bunch of technological retards who are actually being cowed out of their holy war by some stupid sanctions.

If you’ve got a functioning brain in your head, you won’t think that way at all.

Experts say Iran is very close to having a nuclear bomb, as USA Today back in November of LAST YEAR pointed out:

There’s time for stricter sanctions to get Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program, but the Islamic republic is much closer to such weapons than previously believed and a military strike may be necessary, foreign policy experts say.

“With each time we have used sanctions, they’ve had more impact, but ultimately if Iran wants to pay the cost, it can get nuclear weapons,” says Anthony Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “The question is, can we raise the cost enough?”

Western diplomats and nuclear experts who reviewed intelligence on the Iranian nuclear program say Iran has continued work on nuclear weapons with the help of foreign scientists, despite sanctions organized by the Obama administration, a report in The Washington Post said.

Iran IS close to a nuclear weapon.  And for Joe Biden to smirk and mock like the damned fool he is was just one of the numerous examples of Biden not only mocking, but doing so at incredibly inappropriate times.

And not merely “close”; DANGEROUSLY close.

I have pointed out REPEATEDLY that when Iran gets a nuclear bomb in will be ENTIRELY Democrats’ faults and particularly Obama’s and Biden’s fault.  You can go back to the 2008 debates for the Democrat presidential nomination and you can see every Democrat mocking George Bush for saying that Iran was a growing nuclear threat.  They dismissed it and mocked it and cited a report that turned out to be completely false and Iran has been the little nuclear bomb-making engine that could on Obama’s watch.

And the only thing – the ONLY thing – that has slowed Iran down was the Stuxnet virus that the United States and Israel developed UNDER GEORGE BUSH.  And Stuxnet was just one of the many secrets that the Obama administration treasonously leaded to try to make Obama look good on national security to compensate for his failed economy.

Speaking of secrets, Obama has apparently held a not-quite-secret enough negotiation with Iran via Qatar letting Iran know that Obama will suspend the hardest sanctions later if Iran will suspend production on enriched uranium until AFTER the election in November.  Which is another way of saying to Iran that if they hold off production for a month or so Obama will give Iran its nuclear weapon and not do anything to stop it.

Folks like me call that high treason.

Another development is almost as bad.  When Iran gets the nuclear bomb – and if Obama is reelected I guarantee you that Iran will get the bomb – they will not have to use it directly to hurt us badly.

Once Iran becomes a nuclear power with the bomb and the means to deliver it, they will be off-limits to any kind of attack.  It will be not only too late, but WAY too late to deal with the threat they pose.  And one of the things they will be able to do is block the Strait of Hormuz – and send oil prices to $12 a gallon – with absolute impunity.

Here’s another thing that Barack Obama has endowed America with: the threat of a Chinese missile capable of wiping out every single aircraft carrier in our fleet and transforming the naval balance of power in the world:

A new ‘smart missile’ threatens to tip the balance of power towards China, US military analysts say.

The latest generation of the Dong Feng 21D (DF-21D) [Photo] is a supercarrier killer according to experts on China’s armaments. The missile can be launched from land and strike an aircraft carrier 900 miles away.

China has 11,200 miles of coastline. That fact coupled with the range and accuracy of the new missile could spell doom for any US or allied carrier fleet.

Patrick Cronin, a senior director of the Asia-Pacific Security Program that is part of the Washington, DC Center for a New American Security organization admits the DF 21D is designed to kill carriers—specifically US Naval carriers. “The Navy has long had to fear carrier—killing capabilities. The emerging Chinese anti-ship missile capability, and in particular the DF 21D, represents the first post—Cold War capability that is both potentially capable of stopping our naval power projection and deliberately designed for that purpose.”

China and Iran are allies.

If we try to end a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, will we be surprised to find out that China has given Iran a few aircraft carrier killers?

Joe Biden smirked and mocked his way through the debate.  But this is a terrifyingly real possibility that is no laughing matter to anybody but the most deluded of fools.

Unless Iran is told – AND UNLESS IRAN BELIEVES – that the United States will launch a massive military strike that will wipe out Iran’s nuclear capability and as many damned Iranians as get in the way of our wiping it out, they will soon have a nuclear bomb.

And you can read all about the war that the Bible told us would happen in the Book of Revelation.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

21 Responses to “Joe Biden Mocked Iran’s Growing Nuclear Capability In Debate: Because He’s A Fool And Ignorantly Mocks Just Like The Fool He Is”

  1. Dog Walker Says:

    and don’t let me remind you what is really disgusting. Remember back in the ’90s, China was rattling its saber over some crap with Taiwan. They actually threatened to attack the US. That was back in Clinton days. “Course the Clinton administration was a bit vague on the distinction between abject sycophancy and diplomacy. So what do they do? Suck up to China.

    Back in those days China did not have ballistic missile capacity. They had the bomb, but they didn’t have anything they could “deliver it with.” So in those heady days when we were falling over ourselves with our magnanimous efforts to make friends with China guess what?

    We determined that China had a want or a need to be able to launch its own satellite. So we authorized TRW I think it was to consult with and help China get a satellite launched.

    As a result… WE GAVE CHINA THE BALLISTIC DELIVERY CAPACITY FOR THEIR NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

    I put that in up case because I think it is so hysterically funny.

    Not only that, look up Wen Ho Lee on wikipedia. You will get a politicized version that makes Mr Lee the victim of racial profiling but the long and the short of that story is that China got hydrodynamics research codes in the deal as well. Those were computer codes that could be used to simulate and hypothecate nuclear weapons design. We used them to miniaturize weapons. Miniaturized weapons are necessary for multiple weapon warheads.

    So hey, they got that from us too. Aren’t we sweet when we are trying to be friendly?

    Did I forget to mention that back in those days there was a scandal about Clinton getting a few hundred thousand from China by way of a Buddhist temple. Remember that? Boy howdy!

    So now we got cocksucker Biden telling us no we got no worries with respect to another evil regime getting the most destructive force on the planet… and don’t worry because they don’t have delivery technology or all of the necessary ingredients.

    Then you remind me that China and Iran are allies.

    My Christianity is in the closet. I hate Democrats.

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    Yep, Clinton both gave and allowed China to steal critical ballistic missile secrets from us.

    http://freedomsfreefall.blogspot.com/2006/10/bill-clinton-sellsgives-secrets-to.html
    http://cassandra2004.blogspot.com/2005/06/clintons-china-and-scandal-that-we.html

    And China will now pass on the favor to Iran so Iran can have our ballistic missile technology, too.

  3. Dog Walker Says:

    http://www.house.gov/coxreport/chapfs/ch2.html

    Remember the Rosenbergs? They were executed for voilations that fell well short of this.

  4. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE: I am waiting for Romney/Ryan to give a strong argument against the lies that have been engrained into the electorate. Those lies are 1) Tax cuts don’t work to stimulate the economy. 2) When a demoncrat/obamarx says “Lets go back to the Clinton tax policies of the 90s 3) Clinton gave us a booming economy 4) Clinton gave us surpluses.5)the rich don’t pay their fair share 6) the “middle class” pays more than the rich.

    I HAVE YET to hear the R/R ticket articulate away these lies from hardly any of the mainstream conservative talk radio/T, any of these lies away to this day. The fact these lies still exist in their political playbook. Anyway, it is just a theory as to why so many cling to the demoncrat party, especially those old enough to remember Slick Willie, but old enough to remember RR, as to what Slick Willie did, in their minds anyway.

  5. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    Correction: I HAVE YET to hear the R/R ticket articulate away these lies nor from hardly any of the mainstream conservative talk radio/TV.The fact these lies still exist in their political playbook and their political lore makes it hard to do. Anyway, it is just a theory as to why so many cling to the demoncrat party, especially those old enough to remember Slick Willie, but not old enough to remember RR, as to what Slick Willie did, in their minds anyway.

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    Dog Walker,

    Yeah, those were the good old days when there was such a thing as “righteous outrage” and the average American actually loved his or her country rather than viewing it as “the means of the redistribution of capital.” Too bad all that exists now is manufactured outrage in the guise of socialism now.

  7. Michael Eden Says:

    The Dauntless Conservative,

    You and me both.

    I get the most frustrated not watching MSNBC but watching Fox News. Because you EXPECT idiocy from MSNBC, but when the talking heads on Fox who are supposed to be conservatives can’t articulate that tax rate cuts stimulate economic growth and thus increase tax revenues by CREATING MORE TAXPAYERS, I get seriously pissed off.

    As I did during the Ryan-Biden debate. At best, Ryan waved his hand at the FACT that tax cuts increase revenues by mentioning the names of Jack Kennedy and Ronald Reagan (to which Biden immediately personally ridiculed Ryan with the demagoguery that Ryan had just somehow said that he was therefore JFK). Ryan seemed to have forgotten Calvin Coolidge AND George W. Bush.

    Liberals are pathologically stupid people who are determined to be stupid until they take America to the grave. Which is why they don’t understand that JFK called for tax rate cuts BECAUSE THE 90% MARGINAL DAMN RATE WASN’T PRODUCING ENOUGH REVENUE. And lo and behold, Kennedy dramatically cut that rate, and wouldn’t you know it HE INCREASED TAX REVENUES. And of course Reagan did the same, just as Calvin Coolidge and JFK had before him. And then George Bush came along and further proved the emperical fact that every single human being who is not an incompetent idiot knows: that lowering tax rates and allowing people to profit from their harder work and increased investment INCREASES THE ECONOMY AND INCREASES TAX REVENUES. JUST AS IT HAS EVERY SINGLE TIME WE HAVE EVER DONE IT IN HISTORY.

    What year did America have the very highest tax revenues in history? No, you liberal dumbass, it was NOT when the top marginal rate was 90%; it was in 2007 under George W. Bush’s TAX CUT.

    Which liberals demonize because they are a) stupid and b) evil.

    You and I, we keep trying, friend. Here was one of my attempts on that which included this gem which more than any single statement by Obama proves that he is NOT interested in generating more revenue whatsoever:

    MR. GIBSON: You have however said you would favor an increase in the capital gains tax. As a matter of fact, you said on CNBC, and I quote, “I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton, which was 28 percent.”

    It’s now 15 percent. That’s almost a doubling if you went to 28 percent. But actually Bill Clinton in 1997 signed legislation that dropped the capital gains tax to 20 percent.

    SENATOR OBAMA: Right.

    MR. GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.

    SENATOR OBAMA: Right.

    MR. GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased. The government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down. So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?

    SENATOR OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.

    So Obama wants to increase “fairness” even if it hurts America, undermines American business, undermines American investment, undermines the American way of life, and UNDERMINES TAX REVENUES so that we actually had more funds to help the poor that Obama cynically exploits but clearly secretly despises. Because if Obama actually gave one flying DAMN about the poor, he would be cutting tax rates rather than demagoguing them and he would be doing everything he could to encourage churches like the Catholic Church to help the poor more rather than demonizing them and attacking them the way he has done with his vile “war on women” crap.

    To finish my rant, that’s pretty much the reason I am stepping away from the political blogging. Because we are at a point where even our best talking heads are incapable of explaining or articulating damn near ANYTHING. And that’s why we’re over $222 trillion in debt right now and that’s why the beast is coming.

  8. Dog Walker Says:

    Somehow I think we owe the Rosenbergs an apology.

  9. Michael Eden Says:

    Dog Walker,

    Don’t worry. I’m sure Obama will get around to it. He’s already apologized to virtually everybody ELSE about how evil America is.

  10. FMC Says:

    I really like the Biden version of Jack Torrance pic! LOL That is really hilarious. I love Nicholson, but I really think Biden, the truly sick man that he is, may of better been suited for that role, if you can believe it. Even though he is acting, I do think that Nicholson has some of Jack Torrance in him, that some of his genius is that he is somewhat demented – no one could of played the role the way he did, otherwise. NIcholson aside, Biden is an evil, sick, and demonized, real-life psychopath who I could easily see maniacally wielding an ax, smashing to splinters a wooden door and saying to a semi-catatonic Wendy, “Here’s Johnny.” The similarities between Jack and Joe are truly astonishing…. Krauthammer is a genius and nailed that one!

  11. FMC Says:

    I almost forgot, when I got carried away earlier that I caught some of Fox News tonight and according to Real Clear Politics, Romney could win the majority vote and still lose, and that he needs Ohio, that if he does not get Ohio, he will lose the election. We all know that no Republican has won the presidency without taking Ohio, this is not a revelation. I live in Ohio and I am scared because the unions have such a strong presence here and, as you know, nearly all unionized employees vote Democratic. Also, I have met many liberals; it seems that I have met more of them than conservatives. Maybe I am panicking or being irrational, but have you seen anything that seems accurate regarding how Ohio is leaning?

  12. Michael Eden Says:

    FMC,

    Of course, there’s a red-hot debate as to whether Biden is more Jack Torrance from “The Shining” or the Joker from “Batman.” He’s either one or the other; but apparently, the difference matters.

    As to Ohio, I agree with you. I have been concerned for awhile that Romney could win – and even EASILY win – the popular vote and lose in a couple of critical swing states that cost him the election. One of the tricks Obama has used was patented by FDR: to use the billions of dollars of stimulus money as a political slush fund to essentially buy votes. Becuase that’s EXACTLY how FDR politically exploited the New Deal and Obama has followed that script with the stimulus with stimulus funds OVERWHELMINGLY going to key political states like Ohio.

    And then of course there is the damn cheating. And we’ll probably see more than we’ve ever seen because this is THE most dishonest president in American history.

    But every time I get most concerned, I also realize how disingenuous the polls can be. Public Policy Polling, for example, just got caught red-handed exploiting its polling to do advocacy campaigning for Obama. Why should you trust a polling outfit that would do that???

    All I can do is look at the polls that are out there. A couple of them have Romney UP in Ohio, and a couple have Obama only up by one. And which one is the biggest outlier? The very same one that just got caught cheating for Obama.

  13. Dog Walker Says:

    As to polling, I just got a robo call from a survey pertaining to the upcoming general election. I just hung up. I have done that to dozens of pollers. I wonder if there is a political preponderance to those that would hang up and not participate. You think maybe Obama lovers are more keen to express their affection and loyalty and stay on the line for that. I think the GOPs or conservatives are a bit more recalcitrant. I think the polls might have a natural skew in favor of the la la crowd that isn’t necessarily nefarious.

  14. Michael Eden Says:

    Dog Walker,

    You know, I would have assurred you that it is a well-known statistical fact that Democrats are considerably more likely to respond to a poll than a Republicans. But I don’t make statements like that without making sure it really IS a well-known statistical fact, and when I checked it turned out that there was no correlation that I could find between party affiliation and likelihood of responding to a poll.

    I know that I sure as heck don’t want to respond to a dang poll.

    One thing is for sure; they were sure oversampling Democrats at least up until a couple of weeks ago.

  15. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE: re:I get the most frustrated not watching MSNBC but watching Fox News.*** Trust me, I know what you mean When I hear a demoncrat state/say “Clinton saved us” or “FDR saved us” or “Soak the rich” or something of the sort on Fox News and the Fox News reporter obfuscates and cannot counter these lies with facts, I just turn red under the collar….I guess redneck takes on a whole new meaning!!! roflmao!

  16. Michael Eden Says:

    The Dauntless Conservative,

    On my view, what is even worse than the straight reporters who can’t ask decent follow-up questions are the conservative contributors who often get to argue the Republican view. Reporters are supposed to be “unbiased,” but when the people who are PAID to be biased as conservatives can’t or won’t make most of the arguments that we need to make.

    When you’re supposed to be able to know your facts and be able to present them from a conservative perspective, you ought to damn well know your facts and be able and ready to argue for the truth.

    There’s that famous saying, “Evil prevails when good men do nothing.” And if conservatives who are on a networks and writing the articles can’t articulate basic issues such as why tax rate cuts increase government revenues, then they need to step down so somebody can do the job.

  17. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE; There is one conservative talk show that will go where few will go and he articulates better than most…even Limbaugh: Quinn at http://www.warroom.com 6am-10am. You can download mp3s for your smartphone otherwise mp3 player and take it to work. As much as I like Hannity and he has a good heart, he can rarely articulate historical economic data/facts enough to refute a demoncrat. But Romney did Wed night and I was impressed. Even thought I disagree with the R/R platform on taxes. Anyway, more than once I have a heard a idiotic demoncrat spew one of their false cliches, and Hannity just sits there stunned and cannot counter it. He is a good conservative and I generally agree with him most of the time, but he cannot articulate too well.I am at the point I just skip his show along with Billy-O and watch Sons of Guns or American Guns on Discovery. I consider Hannity and Billy-O “lightweights” in their profession.

  18. Michael Eden Says:

    The Dauntless Conservative,

    I am mystified why so few Republicans and conservative talking heads even TRY to articulate why high marginal tax rates are bad for the economy and bad for POOR people and why low marginal tax rates are America’s best hope.

    I’ll have to give your feller Quinn a listening to.

  19. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE; Me too. It’s not rocket science. It is called economic freedom. The cliche “new ideas to create jobs” is a false empty narrative and a waste of time to discuss. Btw, click on the link “affiliates” on the top, left to download the mp3s for free and/or listen to the broadcast through the internet on iHeart radio.

  20. The Dauntless Conservative Says:

    MichaelE; correction: top RIGHT side to click on “Affiliates”

  21. Michael Eden Says:

    The Dauntless Conservative,

    I’ll have to give it a whirl when I’ve got more free time than I’ve got right now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: