Because Child Molesters Love Socialism, Too: Can Anyone Sink So Low That Liberals Would Refuse Them Socialism Funded By Other People’s Money?

I found this as laughable as I found it illustrative:

Re “L.A. adds parks to oust sex offenders,” March 1
I am not a sex offender and to my knowledge don’t know any sex offenders. I certainly don’t condone the illegal actions they committed. And under other circumstances, I would think creating more parks is good.

But when I read The Times’ article about L.A. creating a park in order to force sex offenders from their apartments, I was horrified. Sex offenders need homes like everyone else. These people are human beings and need more support from the city, not less. I’m sure most are trying to put their lives back together and to fight their own urges.

If the city wants to help society, it should assist former sex offenders to have decent housing, provide them with social services and help them get jobs, rather than force them onto the streets.

Rebecca Rona Culver City

The Los Angeles Times print version had the title (written by the newspaper) the headline “They’re people, too.”  Which is of course a highly debatable assertion as far as most “people” are concerned – excluding liberals, of course.  It turns out that government liberalism is FAR more compassionate than God – as long as other people’s money is used to pay for their generosity.  God holds people accountable for their actions; God judges SIN.  Liberalism, by contrast, is only capable of wanting to expand bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger to beget more liberalism (and thus more wickedness).

Is there anything some low-life, cockroach, pile-of-slime, morally-diseased predator of innocence can do to be denied free “decent housing,” free “social services” and free government-created “jobs”?  No.  There is not.

Jesus, out of His compassion healed the lepers and forgave the sinners; but that aint NOTHIN’ compared to Obama’s supernatural compassion: he gave the child molesting scum a check paid for by “taxpayers” with only about half of his largesse coming from money we’re borrowing from China but of course promise our children and grandchildren will pay back with plenty of interest.

Because Obama loves those child molesters so much, so big and so loving is his heart, that he will give them the inheritance of our future generations.  Who – if they could vote today – would surely all choose to be aborted, according to liberal theology.

And because liberalism is all about growing the size of government which grows just as well when it’s doling out handouts to a degenerate pervert as it can when it’s doling them out to somebody who isn’t a piece of slime.  Bureaucracies are needed which are as eternal as the God of Heaven.  And the gates of Heaven shall not prevail against these bureaucracies.

The story being alluded to above – “Los Angeles adding parks to force out sex offenders living nearby” is funny because the uberliberal city of Los Angeles that so warmly invited all these pedophiles to come share their bread are now using the contrived government “service” of city parks to drive them out of the houses they gave them in the first place .  It wasn’t like these perverts went flocking to Texas, you know.  It’s also funny because apparently there’s nothing wrong with discriminating against people because of their sexual orientation, after all.  Which is exactly what religious conservatives have been arguing all along.

It’s kind of laugable in its own way that the liberals who run Los Angeles are now trying to force pedophiles out of their homes so they’ll go somewhere else; given the fact that child molesters are now ditching their GPS devices and slipping out of law enforcement’s ability to track with alarming regularity.  How many of these child molesting turds are going to be leaving their GPS bracelets behild when they’re forced out of their residences???

Liberalism is the constant governing by crisis: they create one crisis (incredibly lax treatment toward pedophiles) and then exploit the failure of their own policy to enact yet another immoral policy.  And then exploit that one to enact ANOTHER immoral policy, and so on ad infinitum.

There are idiot liberals who actually have to pay for their morally idiotic bullcrap out of actual budgets and there are the rest of the liberals who think that money can never be considered an object when a pervert is asking for a handout.  And the liberal with the budget who doesn’t have Obama’s Federal Reserve Money-Fabricating Machine has to choose reality no matter how repulsive reality is to him.

Another thing that’s funny is that the article occurred on the front page of the March 1, 2013 Los Angeles Times an article on the White House involving itself in the Proposition 8 case before the Supreme Court on behalf of sodomy.

If I were an attorney for a child molester – another liberal profession whose status as “people” is highly debatable – here’s what I would do: I would argue that the City of Los Angeles is discriminating against my sexual orientation.  After all, if nobody would choose to be gay, just how many people do you think would choose to be child molesters?  Pedophilia isn’t a “choice” any more than homosexuality is a “choice”; these poor victims were born this way, every bit as much as those beloved homosexuals were.  And it is moralistic and anachronistic to judge “people” for their sexual preferences.

Liberalism cannot withstand the light of individual personal responsibility any more than vampires cannot withstand the light of God’s sun.  They simply must dispense with it all together.

That, for the record, was the original homosexual position.  Oh, yes: NAMBLA – the North American Man/Boy Love Association – was a vibrant part of the Rainbow Coalition and even briefly enjoyed United Nations representation.

Pedophiles were just born “queer” in a slightly different way, is all.

And of course while homosexual marriage has NEVER been practiced by ANY nation until this last, most wicked generation, pederasty – a.k.a. pedophilia – sure has.

For the factual record, given that the Catholic Church was scandalized and demonized by the liberal mainstream media for “pedophile priest”, and given that in 81% of the cases, those acts of “pedophilia” involved post-puberescant, sexually-developed teenagers rather than tiny little toddlers, I am further warranted to connect homosexuality and pedophilia together just as the left connected it together to attack the Catholic Church.

We are a nation in decline amidst a culture that has already spilled right out into a toxic sewer.  And Obama is demanding more and more tax hikes to fund more and more of his perversion.

And thanks to liberals, we’re going to be forced to keep paying for it until our complete economic collapse.  And then a desperate, hungry people who have already proven how wicked they are will demand that government save them from the disaster that government created.  And therefore they will choose more socialism to save them from the disaster of socialism.

Tags: , , , , ,

15 Responses to “Because Child Molesters Love Socialism, Too: Can Anyone Sink So Low That Liberals Would Refuse Them Socialism Funded By Other People’s Money?”

  1. Dog Walker Says:

    we need a civil war

  2. FMC Says:

    Dog Walker,

    LOL! We might be heading that way. Maybe the DHS thinks so, as they have purchased 2700 light-armored tanks to go along with their 1.6 billion ammunition stockpile.

  3. genomega1 Says:

    Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
    Because Child Molesters Love Socialism, Too: Can Anyone Sink So Low That Liberals Would Refuse Them Socialism Funded By Other People’s Money?

  4. Gunny G Says:


  5. Anna Bennett Says:

    I agree with what Rebecca Rona said.It seems to me like the politicians not only in LA,but through out Calif.Have lost their Marbles.

    By them telling the sex offenders to go to the Parks where there will be children, it sounds to me like they are looking to put the sex offenders back in to prison in stead of giving the men or women a chance to get their heads together & & start living a better live.

    Maybe I’m wrong,I really don’t know.

  6. FMC Says:

    Although this doesn’t have anything to do with this article, this is interesting considering the Dow is back to where it was at its peak before the crash of 08′. The only reason it is where it is, is because of the massive FED pumping. In this brave new world, perception is everything. Below are some economic fundamentals and indicators between then and now.

    •Dow Jones Industrial Average: Then 14164.5; Now 14164.5
    •Regular Gas Price: Then $2.75; Now $3.73
    •GDP Growth: Then +2.5%; Now +1.6%
    •Americans Unemployed (in Labor Force): Then 6.7 million; Now 13.2 million
    •Americans On Food Stamps: Then 26.9 million; Now 47.69 million
    •Size of Fed’s Balance Sheet: Then $0.89 trillion; Now $3.01 trillion
    •US Debt as a Percentage of GDP: Then ~38%; Now 74.2%
    •US Deficit (LTM): Then $97 billion; Now $975.6 billion
    •Total US Debt Oustanding: Then $9.008 trillion; Now $16.43 trillion
    •US Household Debt: Then $13.5 trillion; Now 12.87 trillion
    •Labor Force Particpation Rate: Then 65.8%; Now 63.6%•Consumer Confidence: Then 99.5; Now 69.6
    •S&P Rating of the US: Then AAA; Now AA+
    •VIX: Then 17.5%; Now 14%
    •10 Year Treasury Yield: Then 4.64%; Now 1.89%
    •EURUSD: Then 1.4145; Now 1.3050
    •Gold: Then $748; Now $1583
    •NYSE Average LTM Volume (per day): Then 1.3 billion shares; Now 545 million shares

  7. Michael Eden Says:

    doesn’t have anything to do with this article


    Doesn’t have anything to do with this article?

    Let’s see: child molesters is to human sexuality as Obama’s Federal Reserve policies are to economics.

    Seems like there’s a connection to me: it’s just the same kind of depraved, demon-possessed cockroaches doing what they do in their own realms of perversion.

    (wink wink).

    Btw, it’s rather fascinating that the DOW has made its biggest gains DURING the time that Obama has been demagoguing the sequester and saying planes would fall out of the sky and whole cities would burn down, isn’t it???

  8. Michael Eden Says:

    Anna Bennett,

    A couple of things: Just to make sure everybody understands, Rebecca Rona is OPPOSED to the cities driving out the pedophiles because as a faithful liberal she believes that no reprobate can ever descend too low for government to provide them with all the benefits of socialism. And also understand that the liberals who run Los Angeles – years after they listened to the ACLU instruction on how to properly treat child molesters to their full panoply of “rights” – are now building useless parks for the SOLE PURPOSE of then saying that the child molesters have to now move because they’re close to a park that was built for no other purpose than to build said park where child molesters live in order to force selfsame child molesters to move.

    I submit that only a truly evil person would want a government to have this kind of power over its people – to literally build something for no other purpose than to attack citizens.

    Did we have another way to deal with child molesters? Yeah: IGNORE MORALLY STUPID LIBERALS AND KEEP THOSE TURDS IN PRISON IN THE FIRST PLACE. It was LIBERALS who recommended the incredibly lax treatment pedophiles get; it is liberal judges who refuse to hand down stiff sentences for child molesters; and it is liberal mayors and governors who refuse to enact Jessica’s Law that helps keep these vile people from society. And if it were up to me there would be a blood-stained tree stump in front of every single prison and jail in America where child molesters placed their sexual organs and testicles for forcible removal with a logger’s axe.

    Child molestation is a crime against innocence. These monsters ought to be euthanized like rabid dogs.

    So, yeah, we actually COULD deal with pedophiles without cities spending millions of dollars to build parks for the sole purpose of forcing them to move to be a problem somewhere ELSE.

    In that sense, the City of Los Angeles is rather like the Catholic Church at its WORST: they don’t give a damn where the child molesters go; they just want them to go someplace else and be a problem to some other city the way the Catholic diocese wanted them to be a problem for some other diocese.

  9. Michael Eden Says:

    Thanks Gunny G.

  10. Michael Eden Says:

    Thank you, genomega1.

  11. Anna Bennett Says:

    Michael,I like your idea of turning Child molesters in to Unicks.or how ever it is spelled.
    Lets add Rapist to that as well.

  12. Michael Eden Says:

    Anna Bennett,

    I believe it is “eunuchs” and I’m all for adding rapists to the “EU” (Eunuch’s Union). Bearing in mind that rapists were “born that way” and are merely expressing their sexual preferences the same way homosexuals do. Joey prefers other boys; Stewart prefers to rape. That’s just their “sexual preference” and who are we to judge other people’s sexual preferences???

    Keep in mind that homosexuality is a Darwinian dead end, while rape is good according to Darwinian evolution that liberals believe in as opposed to believing in God.

    As for the axe thing, we could create tens of thousands of jobs with the title “Pedophile Therapist.” And what do you want to bet that the rate of child molestation would inexplicably (in the reasoning of liberalism) take a giant plunge????

    It’s literally even biblical: “If your weenie causeth ye to stumble, whack it off” (paraphrase of Mathew 18:7-9).

  13. Anna Bennett Says:

    I like the job title, ” Pedophile Therapist ” O’ my God.I laugh so hard.

  14. Michael Eden Says:

    Anna Bennett,

    Keep in mind this is different from most other kind of therapies that liberals love so much in place of morality; because would be a therapy that would actually WORK.

  15. Anna Bennett Says:

    Yes I know that is why I like it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: