Why The More Democrats Destroy The American Economy, The Better It Will Be For Them Politically

In my student years and then in my working years, I have met many women whose boyfriends, live-in boyfriends or husbands treated them worse than I would treat dog crap.

It worked beautifully for the guys: they so destroyed these women’s self-esteem that they stayed with the men who abused them.

Why?  Their spirits were so crushed that they had been convinced that the low-life scum who abused them were the best they could ever hope to get.

And so they foolishly and self-destructively remained in abusive relationships.  If they had the crap beat out of them, they made sure to tell the police a story about some accident that hadn’t happened.

They sustained and protected and nurtured a “relationship” that was literally worse than cancer.

The national economic equivalent of the man I just described is Barack Hussein Obama.

He has so completely crushed so many desperate people – after selling them lie after lie after lie after lie – while holding out his socialist welfare state as the only solution for his massive economic failure – that many Americans believe Obama’s welfare society is their only hope.

Americans discouraged by economic recovery leave labor force
Published April 07, 2013
Associated Press

WASHINGTON –  After a full year of  fruitless job hunting, Natasha Baebler just gave up.

She’d already abandoned hope of getting work in her field, working with the  disabled. But she couldn’t land anything else, either — not even a job interview  at a telephone call center.

Until she feels confident enough to send out resumes again, she’ll get by on  food stamps and disability checks from Social Security and live with her parents  in St. Louis.

“I’m not proud of it,” says Baebler, who is in her mid-30s and is blind. “The  only way I’m able to sustain any semblance of self-preservation is to rely on  government programs that I have no desire to be on.”

Baebler’s frustrating experience has become all too common nearly four years  after the Great Recession ended: Many Americans are still so discouraged that  they’ve given up on the job market.

Older Americans have retired early. Younger ones have enrolled in school.  Others have suspended their job hunt until the employment landscape brightens.  Some, like Baebler, are collecting disability checks.

It isn’t supposed to be this way. After a recession, an improving economy is  supposed to bring people back into the job market.

Instead, the number of Americans in the labor force — those who have a job or  are looking for one — fell by nearly half a million people from February to  March, the government said Friday. And the percentage of working-age adults in  the labor force — what’s called the participation rate — fell to 63.3 percent  last month. It’s the lowest such figure since May 1979.

The falling participation rate tarnished the only apparent good news in the  jobs report the Labor Department released Friday: The unemployment rate dropped  to a four-year low of 7.6 percent in March from 7.7 in February.

People without a job who stop looking for one are no longer counted as  unemployed. That’s why the U.S. unemployment rate dropped in March despite weak  hiring. If the 496,000 who left the labor force last month had still been  looking for jobs, the unemployment rate would have risen to 7.9 percent in  March.

“Unemployment dropped for all the wrong reasons,” says Craig Alexander, chief  economist with TD Bank Financial Group. “It dropped because more workers stopped  looking for jobs. It signaled less confidence and optimism that there are jobs  out there.”

The participation rate peaked at 67.3 percent in 2000, reflecting an influx  of women into the work force. It’s been falling steadily ever since.

Part of the drop reflects the baby boom generation’s gradual move into  retirement. But such demographics aren’t the whole answer.

Even Americans of prime working age — 25 to 54 years old — are dropping out  of the workforce. Their participation rate fell to 81.1 percent last month, tied  with November for the lowest since December 1984.

“It’s the lack of job opportunities — the lack of demand for workers — that  is keeping these workers from working or seeking work,” says Heidi Shierholz, an  economist at the liberal Economic Policy Institute. The Labor Department says  there are still more than three unemployed people for every job opening.

Cynthia Marriott gave up her job search after an  interview in October for a position as a hotel concierge.

“They never said no,” she says. “They just never called me back.”

Her husband hasn’t worked full time since 2006. She cashed out her 401(k)  after being laid off from a job at a Los Angeles entertainment publicity firm in  2009. The couple owes thousands in taxes for that withdrawal. They have no  health insurance.

She got the maximum 99 weeks’ of unemployment benefits then allowed in  California and then moved to Atlanta.

Now she is looking to receive federal disability benefits for a lung  condition that she said leaves her weak and unable to work a full day. The  application is pending a medical review.

“I feel like I have no choice,” says Marriott, 47. “It’s just really sad and  frightening”

During the peak of her job search, Marriott was filling out 10 applications a  day. She applied for jobs she felt overqualified for, such as those at Home  Depot and Petco but never heard back. Eventually, the disappointment and fatigue  got to her.

“I just wanted a job,” she says. “I couldn’t really go on anymore looking for  a job.”

Young people are leaving the job market, too. The participation rate for  Americans ages 20 to 24 hit a 41-year low 69.6 percent last year before bouncing  back a bit. Many young people have enrolled in community colleges and  universities. That’s one reason a record 63 percent of adults ages 25 to 29 have  spent at least some time in college, according to the Pew Research Center.

Older Americans are returning to school, too. Doug Damato, who lives in  Asheville, N.C., lost his job as an installer at a utility company in February  2012. He stopped looking for work last fall, when he began taking classes in  mechanical engineering at Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College.

Next week, Damato, 40, will accept an academic award for earning top grades.  But one obstacle has emerged: Under a recent change in state law, his  unemployment benefits will now end July 1, six months earlier than he  expected.

He’s planning to work nights, if possible, to support himself once the  benefits run out. Dropping out of school is “out of the question,” he said,  given the time he has already put into the program.

“I don’t want a handout,” he says. “I’m trying to better myself.”

Many older Americans who lost their jobs are finding refuge in Social  Security’s disability program. Nearly 8.9 million Americans are receiving  disability checks, up 1.3 million from when the recession ended in June  2009.

Natasha Baebler’s journey out of the labor force and onto the disability  rolls began when she lost her job serving disabled students and staff members at  Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., in February 2012.

For six months, she sought jobs in her field, brandishing master’s degrees in  social education and counseling. No luck.

Then she just started looking for anything. Still, she had no takers.

“I chose to stop and take a step back for a while … After you’ve seen that  amount of rejection,” she says, “you start thinking, ‘What’s going to make this  time any different?'”

Let’s just call it “Battered Worker Syndrome.”

How did Obama campaign against Mitt Romney?  Well, this rich turd demonized and slandered Mitt Romney as a rich turd who didn’t care about the poor.  Even though while Obama – just a couple years before deciding to run for president – gave virtually NOTHING to the poor or to charity, Mitt Romney was giving tens of millions of dollars to the poor.  Who was the real rich turd who didn’t care about the poor?

Look at the one-percenter vacation-vacation-vacation lifestyle of the Obamas since they got to live off the fat of everybody else.  And then consider that the Romenys never even had a damn MAID.

Republicans are generous people.  In fact they are FAR more generous than Democrats.  But rather than cynically exploiting the desperation of the poor to create wasteful federal bureaucracy after wasteful federal bureaucracy that pisses away other people’s money, Republicans believe that WE as individuals should give, whereas Democrats believe that they are generous because they’re willing to give away other people’s money.

Republicans don’t want tax cuts because they’re greedy or selfish; they want tax cuts because if they are allowed to control more of their own money, they will be able to build a better, bigger economy that will benefit EVERYONE.  They want tax cuts because it is better for both those who give to the needy as well as the needy who receive the gifts when private individuals and organizations control the charitable giving.

Margaret Thatcher put it brilliantly: Under the failed policies of the liberals, Britain had degenerated into “the new sick man of Europe.”  The economy was in shambles when Thatcher took over.  She turned the nation around.  But liberals couldn’t have cared less; what mattered to them was that the rich had become richer along with everyone else in the nation.   And as Margaret Thatcher put it, “Liberals prefer that the poor become poorer so long as the rich become less rich.”

You were lied to by a wicked man.  And on the other side of that coin is the fact that it is bad people who believe lies.  Which means YOU.

But Obama knows how to slander.  He knows how to demonize.  He knows how to fearmonger.  No one but the coming Antichrist will ever be better at it.  And Obama’s new Democrat Party will frame the next election this way: if you vote for Republicans, they’ll end the welfare state that you [thanks to Democrats] now depend on.

It takes courage and selfless integrity to vote outside of yourself and support the policies that will be best for THE COUNTRY and for the country’s longer-term prosperity.  Obama knows that you don’t have either one of those things.  He trusts in your cowardice and in your greed, and he knows how to exploit those pathetic traits that now dominate the American people’s national “character.”

What Obama promised would work we now know DIDN’T.  The average American household lost forty percent of its wealth thanks to Obama’s failed policies.  The median household lost $4,300 under Obama. But – like Hillary Clinton said over the treasonous debacle in Benghazi – “What difference does it make now?”  You know, now that thanks to liberalism you’re dependent on the tit of the federal government and if you can’t keep sucking other people’s money you’ll die because you’ve been reduced to being helpless?

Next presidential election, I believe that people will vote for their welfare check and to hell with the economy.  And I believe that because that’s pretty much what we did in 2008 and in 2012.

The Republican Party is the party of adults who have finally reached the place where they know what will make a business or a household economic plan work.  They are adults who have worked hard to earn something and believe that they  should be able to keep more of what they earn rather than giving it away to a class-warfare system of Marxist redistributionism [in exchange for votes].  And Obma knows that the American people have degenerated into children who want their mommy and daddy – or after mommy and daddy the federal government – to keep treating them like babies forever.

That’s why the worse things get economically, the better off the Democrat Party will be in 2016.

Tags: , , , , ,

26 Responses to “Why The More Democrats Destroy The American Economy, The Better It Will Be For Them Politically”

  1. genomega1 Says:

    Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
    Why The More Democrats Destroy The American Economy, The Better It Will Be For Them Politically

  2. Michael Eden Says:


    Thanks for your blog work.

  3. Gunny G Says:

    Reblogged this on AMERICAN BLOGGER: GUNNY.G ~ WEBLOG.EMAIL and commented:

  4. Truth Unites... and Divides Says:

    “He [Obama] has so completely crushed so many desperate people – after selling them lie after lie after lie after lie – while holding out his socialist welfare state as the only solution for his massive economic failure – that many Americans believe Obama’s welfare society is their only hope.”

    “[Low-Information] Voters, do you want the Red Pill or the Blue Pill?”

    “Blue is Liberal Obamanomics and Liberal policies, right? And the Red is Mean-Spirited, Hateful, Conservatives and Republicans who thump the Bible and are against Pro-Choice and Marriage Equality, right?”

    “Yes. And Yes.”

    “We’ll take the Blue Pill please. And we’ll take it over and over again. Can’t overdose on the Blue Pill, don’t ya know?”

    “As you wish.”

  5. FMC Says:

    What is happening to the economy is being done on purpose. Oboma and his cohorts hate this country and they have an agenda. They want a one-world government that is totally dominated by government, where government is God. Right now, the only thing standing in the way of that is a free America. They know that this evil plan can’t being implemented all at once, so you get what we have going on today. They want to make out of all of us slaves and peasants. Satan dominates and, like him, they two wish to dominate us. This is the judgement that this nation gets from turning away from God. You have to serve one master and there are only two.

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    Thank you, Gunny.

  7. Michael Eden Says:

    Truth Unites,

    Your analogy may have been depending on the movie “The Matrix.” If it was, then I want to make sure everybody else is “in” on your analogy. And dang, if it wasn’t, it should have been.

    Red pill vs. blue pill:

    The red pill and its opposite, the blue pill, are pop culture symbols representing the choice between the blissful ignorance of illusion (blue) and embracing the sometimes painful truth of reality (red).

    The terms, popularized in science fiction culture, derive from the 1999 film The Matrix. In the movie, the main character Neo is offered the choice between a red pill and a blue pill. The blue pill would allow him to remain in the fabricated reality of the Matrix. The red pill would lead to his escape from the Matrix and into the “real world”.

    You couldn’t be more correct. The blue pill of the Democrat Party is a fabricated bogus fake reality of a welfare state that can last forever and make life happy for everybody. It is a demonic lie. By contrast, the red pill of the Republican Party is the grown-up reality that you can’t do what the Democrats have done for DECADES – let along the “fundamental transformation” from Obama – and hope to survive in the actual world.

    God-despising, Judeo-Christian-worldview-hating Democrats want people to live in a fake world. Because of their postmodernist, existentialist, fascist worldview, they are completely divorced from reality and will lead America into a) collapse, b) the Antichrist and then c) the mark of the beast.

    Excellent point, Truth Unites.

  8. Michael Eden Says:


    This is by no means my attempt to say you’re wrong (because everything you say may be true and I believe Obama is cynical enough and evil enough for you to be completely right).

    But in my previous writings I’ve framed it a different way.

    On the view I’ve presented, Obama – while most CERTAINLY qualifying as “The Cloward and Piven President” who wouldn’t mind collapsing the entire economy so that he could “fundamentally transform” it for the Antichrist who will come after him – Obama has a bifurcated approach to the economy.

    If everything goes to hell, Obama knows that the entire economy will collapse. And he knows that a desperate, panicked people confronted by the collapse will demand that the government help them. And hence we’ll get the true communist state that Obama truly wants. Obama wins. Obama also knows that it frankly doesn’t matter how much to blame for the coming collapse he is, because the media propanda that dominates the “news” will blame Republicans no matter how much Republicans fought to keep the colllapse from occurring.

    But Obama may (on my view) not “intended” for the economy to collapse. On the other side, Obama’s giant crony capitalist fascist takeover of the government may somehow actually SUCCEED. And then who gets the credit? Obama and the Democrats.

    So, on my presentation, Obama took these giant risks to completely transform America with a “lose I win and win I win” approach.

    That’s what I see coming. Reality doesn’t mean a damn to the left (see Truth Unites and my response to him for more on that). In fact they DESPISE reality and truly believe that THEY (and certainly not God) are in charge and in control of “reality” and who gets to alter it and shape it and fabricate it to a sheep population.

    Going back to the analogy of “The Matric,” they are the ones who give us the blue pill that makes us see and experience whatever the hell they want to make us see and experience.

    If you go back to the first truly liberal ideologue journalists – men like Bernays and Lippmann who truly shaped “journalism” into PROPAGANDA designed to sell the public into whatever message they wanted to sell the public on – you will see that the “blue pill” thing was around LONG before “The Matrix” movie.

    I’ve written about Edward Bernays and Walter Lippmann in articles like this one. These fascist liberals truly believed that “journalists” should perform thought control and had every right and in fact even DUTY to do so.

    The blue pill, indeed. Everyone should be force-fed the blue pill. And if the Democrats get their way, they will criminalize the “reality dose” of the red pill.

  9. Truth Unites... and Divides Says:

    Mike, I’m well-pleased that you caught my reference to the movie, The Matrix.

    FWIW, you know what’s funny. One of the brothers who made the Matrix is a transgendered something. How ironic.

  10. Truth Unites... and Divides Says:

    “Why The More Democrats Destroy The American Economy, The Better It Will Be For Them Politically”

    Let’s assume your thesis. And, in fact, I do.

    The onus, then, falls squarely upon the electorate, and by extension, the liberal media complex for bewitching the electorate, as well as the liberal educational establishment who have indoctrinated the young to lack discernment.

    Conservatives/Originalists/Constitutionalists/Biblical Christians abhor senseless violencce. But I fear that senseless violence is coming.

  11. Anna Bennett Says:

    I am really getting sick & tired of the majoredy of Democrats in the White House.

    I don’t care & I don’t want to know how any one does it,but they need to get RID of them..

  12. molisa Says:

    Whatever the reasons for holding on to Diaoyu Islands, Japan claim to ownership is weak.

    There are books, reports and maps from the 15th century, during the period of the Ming Dynasty, that establish in no uncertain terms that Diaoyu Island is Chinese territory.

    The book Voyage with a Tail Wind and the Record of the Imperial Envoy Visit to Ryukyu bear testimony to this. Even writings by Japanese scholars in the 19th century acknowledged this fact.

  13. Dog Walker Says:

    I hate Democrats. I hate Republicans that smell like Democrats.

    I see your analogy of the abusive relationship as comparable to our dysfunctional political and economic setup.

    In my city’s paper morning paper there was an article about immigration reform. A creepy crappy politician named Ben Lujan expressed the necessity of an immigration reform bill including an increase of H1B visas. These H1B guys are highly skilled technical workers. According to Lujan, we need the entrepreneurial aptitudes of these guys to create jobs in our country.

    Wait a minute. Lujan doesn’t know shit about that. He has been a government creep all of his life. He wouldn’t get that H1B’s are getting the jobs that this country’s graduates have been dreaming of while struggling through their educations.

    He doesn’t get that these H1B’s get this county’s corporate knowledge and then take it back to their home country and create companies there.

    Another politician, Michelle Lujan Grisham advocates that illegal immigrants that are in the pipe for amnesty should be provided with health care. Oh, she has got her hands in the money trough and is feeling oh so magnanimous with our money. Hey, I think we should worship her.

    Hey, I know I am on the hot seat for using profanity but I am still going to say this: Who the fuck do these guys represent?

    Rhetorical answer to the rhetorical question:

    You talked about the elderly as being a betrayed demographic. I could elaborate on that. You know what I would say.

    These guys are buying votes from the illegal immigrant demographic. Um, duh, with our money. That’s who is going to replace the elderly who have historically infused a bit of adult like sanity into our political process.

    I could say this. We need a civil war. the powers that be are importing voters to help with the tax collection. They ain’t white, so it is ok if they hate white guys. Everybody likes that.

    We need a civil war. But that remark coming from grandma and grandpa ain’t gonna do much. Won’t even raise an eyebrow.

  14. Dog Walker Says:

    Did I tell you, I used to be a Democrat?

  15. joemarx868 Says:

    I never get tired of being right! ANyone who hates Barack Obama IS in fact a racist scumbag!

    You clearly have an anti-Obama bug up your butt, so ANY answer that disagrees with your narrow-minded views will not matter to you.

    Obama is not an evil man but certainly a poor leader!
    If Obama is a muslim, he’s an awful one. Drinks, smokes, supports gay marriage, and attended Christian church for over 20 years. Obama is a Christian!

    You can only impeach a President for something he did. You can’t remove him for something he didn’t do. and Obama didn’t do anything!

    He’s a politican…All politicans lies, but what I won’t stand is that he is called a liar by the exact same hypocrites who lie about the President on a daily basis. Lies about his ideology, his birth place, his birth certificate, his religion, his layolity to America, a.k.a. Racists and bigots like you! spouting Every Republican Lie About President Obama!

    Is B.O. destroying America? No, the system is imploding. B.O is trying to keep it together as best he can, but without the willingness to actually admit to the people there’s a systemic problem, all you’re going to get is bubble gum and duct tape. The guy from the other party is no better.

    A usurper? He is the legitimately elected President. His birth has been proven beyond reasonable doubt, both through document and newspaper evidence, and as his mother was an American citizen that challenge is moot to begin with.

    There is nothing treasonous about limiting the size of a magazine, requiring a background check, banning semi-automatic weapons. (It happened before, it could happen again.) The Supreme Court has already ruled that the government can place limits the 2nd Amendment.

    Of course, no one is trying to repeal the 2nd Amendment.

    He isn’t a marxist, He isn’t a traitor
    He isn’t a dictator, if he was it wouldn’t matter what Congress does. Perhaps you don’t know what the term dictator means.

    Allegations that Obama secretly follows a non-Christian religion, or that he is the Antichrist, have been suggested since he campaigned for the US Senate in 2004. As with conspiracy theories surrounding his citizenship status, these claims are promoted by various fringe theorists and political opponents, who regularly post on this blog.

    Why you hate Obama so much is a mystery to me. The hate you hold in your hearts is antithetical to Christ’s teachings.

    Many of you hate him because of his color. I say this based on what I have read in this comments thread.

  16. Michael Eden Says:


    It’s rather laughable that a guy calling himself “joeMARX” is trying to defend Obama by saying he most certainly isn’t a Marxist.

    I block liars. And that’s why I’m blocking YOU.

    You assert that I’m some kind of “racist.” What’s your evidence? Can you go to a single thing I’ve EVER written in more than 2,500 articles to document that?

    Nope. You don’t need facts. Facts get in your way.

    All you need is a skull full of evil and a soul full of racist, bigoted hate and then you let your vile assertions do the rest.

    Get lost. Anybody who calls me a “racist” and doesn’t have a buttload of quotes from my writings to document it is the very worst kind of slanderous liar. And I block liars.

  17. Michael Eden Says:


    I hope you sit down for this but … it isn’t the 15th century anymore.

    The day Democrats give California back to Mexico, maybe that “way back when dinosaurs walked the earth this was our land” argument will carry some weight.

  18. Michael Eden Says:

    Mike, I’m well-pleased that you caught my reference to the movie, The Matrix.

    Truth Unites… and Divides,

    I figured you probably were very much aware of your reference. I just didn’t want a brilliant analysis to remain unspoken.

    One of the more interesting articles I remember coming across was one that presented a rather overwhelmingly documented claim that “sitcoms” came out of something called “gay camp theater.” Basically, in gay camp theater, you had plot after plot that somebody had a secret that they didn’t feel they could tell another character in the story. Which of course created a comedic misunderstanding that blew up. Which of course has been pretty much the plot of every sitcom like EVER.

    The underlying secret is “I’m homosexual,” of course. They repressed the “secret.” Which then ultimately explodes.

    The message of gay campt theater was always, “come out of the closet.”

    And thanks largely to the comedic plots of the sitcoms, homosexuals WERE able to come out.

    What is interesting about the “blue pill” of “The Matrix” is the underlying hidden flaw: namely, that if you had given the RED pill to “the Greatest Generation” who defeated fascism, they would have immediately assumed that they had been given the WRONG pill. Because unlike the current incredibly cynical generation perverted by liberal secular humanism, they would have assumed that the world could and would become a BETTER place. A WWII veteran who had defeated the Nazis and the Imperial fascist Japanese would have awakened in the vat and believed that he had taken the pill that had snatched reality from him rather than the other way around.

    The “red pill” vs. “blue pill” device in “The Matrix” ultimately depends on the cynicism that the world is a bad place.

    The young generation – which most votes Democrat, of course – is the generation that is more “tuned out” to reality than any before it. They have trapped themselves first into computer games that enabled them to simply avoid reality altogether and more recently by phones and gadgets that make them look like chickens pecking for feed. You won’t catch me with one of those idiot phones (iPhones).

    And the ironic thing is that it is BECAUSE of that underlying liberal secular humanist cynicism that they have in fact made the world the bad place they so fear. Postmodernism depnds on pessimism, cynicism and a dislike for reality. And it was liberals who tried to remake “reality” who have made the world such a dark place. And ultimately, it will become the darkest place of all as the big government BEAST comes with his mark that allows the government to dominate everything and everybody who buys or sells.

  19. Michael Eden Says:

    Dog Walker,

    The interesting thing about your H1B visas is the fact that until Lyndon Johnson and Ted Kennedy, THE HIGHLY SKILLED WORKERS AMERICA NEEDED used to be the very people who were allowed to immigrate.

    Democrats “fundamentally transformed” immigration in the 1960s. It was perverted from bringing in the skilled workers that America needed to “chain migration” favoring entire families of useless people who were only good at unskilled manual labor and soaking up the welfare benefits that the creators of the welfare state had created.

    If we were to end the chain migration boondoggle, we could go a great distance toward fixing the demonic way that liberals have ruined America.

    Which is why it will never happen.

    Because the beast is coming. And you can bet he’ll speak Spanish.

  20. Michael Eden Says:

    Did I tell you, I used to be a Democrat?

    Dog Walker,

    I believe you let it slip out once or twice.

    Lucky for me, my dad explained why he was a Republican to me as a child after I asked my uncle why he was a Democrat and he replied, “Because Democrats help people.”

    That line bothered me, because I knew my mom and dad were Republican, and it amounted to the claim that my mom and dad didn’t help people. Even though they were doing quite a bit to help ME.

    My dad turned around my uncle’s demagogic argument: Republicans believe that PEOPLE should help people. Democrats reject that; they believe that only GOVERNMENT should help people. And so Democrats do everything they can to tax people so they CAN’T help other people, and then create giant government boondoggles which piss money away and perpetuate poverty.

    Which is, of course, pretty damn much exactly what they did then and still do now.

  21. FMC Says:

    Lot of interesting comments on this article. I often get the “you must be racist” crap that joemarx spouts. This really pisses my off. I, like Mr. Eden, demand the evidence and will get right up in the face of the coward liberal to get the answers. “Many of you hate him because of his color. I say this based on what I have read in this comments thread.” This statement here really got me going, because I re-read all the comments several times and still can’t find any evidence to support this. The only racist comment actually came from the poster who claims that everyone else is racist. I hate liberalism and I hate lying cowards – both are pretty much the same.

    Also, ignorant liberal joemarx’s claim that Obama is a Christian because he attended the Goddamn America church of Mr. Wright for 20 years is a stupidly false one. This statement shows just how really ignorant joemarx really is. First, Wright’s church is not Christian, but a hate cult based on liberation theology. I am not exactly sure what Obama really is, but he certainly is not a Christian!

    The birth certificate that obama produced to prove his birth place was not the original and there has been alot of speculation among experts that this one may have been altered or fake. Of course, if space aliens abducted you and performed a full anal-probe, you would probably still not believe it really happened despite the reoccurring nightmares and the extremely sore butt. Also, why has Obama spent a large sum of money to have his records sealed?

    Liberal democrats ultimately want a total gun ban, just like in Britain or Australia. Guns are the only thing standing in the way of their total take over of America. For instance, Feinstein in the first assault weapons ban said if she could of gotten the necessary votes she would have banned all firearms. Here, this clip is short, but about halfway through it, you can here the words come right out of her rotting mouth:

    There are other politicians who want the same and all you liberals that say I am whacked, start researching this and you will find there are plenty of others like the demonic Feinstein. Screw you liberals…. liars and thieves….. It is time that you morons look yourselves in the mirror.

  22. Michael Eden Says:


    Where to begin? You covered so much!

    But I know: with Obama’s pseudo-Christianity. As I documented, this past election was the first one – to my knowledge – in American history in which it could be easily documented that NEITHER candidate was a Christian in any historic understanding of Judeo-Christianity.

    This quote – which Obama has repeated in similar form on a number of occasions to prove that it wasn’t just one poorly-worded statement – is all you need from Obama to know that he is no real Christian, just as “Mormon” was all we needed to know that Mitt Romney was no true Christian:

    “… working on issues of crime and education and employment and seeing that in some ways certain portions of the African American community are doing as bad if not worse, and recognizing that my fate remain tied up with their fates, that my individual salvation is not going to come about without a collective salvation for the country.

    The Bible couldn’t make it more plain: every INDIVIDUAL is saved by faith in Jesus Christ and His atoning work on the cross. There IS no “collective salvation” in the Bible.

    Jesus put it this way: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” — John 14:6

    Here’s about the closest thing to “collective salvation” in the New Testament:

    He then brought them out and asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved–you and your household.” — Acts 16:30-31

    The man correctly asks in his question something that Barack Obama refuses to understand: he asks, “What must I do to be saved?” And the apostles told him that he needed to believe in Jesus. And that in the same way, if each member of his household believed in the same way he believed, they would all be saved.

    “Collective salvation” is “collectivist salvation.” It is liberation theology, which is a candy-coating of pseudo-Christianity over a very large and very hard nut of communism.

    No, Barack Obama is NOT a Christian.

    In the God damned America Obama officially degenerated America down into, we had a “choice” between a Mormon who believed that Jesus Christ is the spirt brother of Lucifer, versus a man who actually IS the spirit brother of Lucifer.

    As for the “racist” thing, liberals couldn’t care less about “facts” or “evidence.” The charge enough is sufficient for them to convict. And of course on their depraved view, only THEY get to bring the charge.

    I have come to realize that facts or truth have absolutely no contact with liberalism at all. They couldn’t care less about either. They live in a world of secular humanist theories that have nothing whatsoever to do with reality. Because “reality” is the world as God sees it – and they therefore hate “reality” as much as they hate God and as much as they hate the Word of God.


    Harvard wouldn’t even have CONSIDERED Obama for enrollment. UNLESS … Obama applied to these schools as a foreign exchange student. That is the ONLY way his poor grades would have been overlooked.

    If Obama legitimately applied as a foreign exchange student, then he obviously is not a citizen of the United States and therefore is ineligible to be president. On the other hand, if Obama falsly claimed that he was a foreign exhange student, then that fact ought to be enough to impeach him from office as a lying fraud who cynically abused the system to help himself at the detriment of the people he says he wants to help.

    And as for the gun ban crap, Democrats are no different than their socialist buddies the Nazis and the Stalinists who did the same damn thing.

    Personally, I demand that Democrats provide a detailed explanation as to what they believe the 2nd Amendment means and what it guarantees as a basis for ANY deal on ANY kind of restriction on guns. Because the bottom line is this: you can’t negotiate with people who employ a sliding scale and take away part of our rights with the intent of taking the rest of them away later. And that’s exactly what Democrats keep doing.

  23. Sprayandpay Says:

    There’s another side to the coin. The ultra right (those at the globalist level) also want to control everyone and their means is thru DRM/Copyright paranoia because of some girl who listens and sells illegal mp3s or people who download games usually old ones no one cares about anymore.

    There technically isn’t anything wrong with listening to them for your own pleasure as there is enough copies of music that these people get rich anways and when you buy a used product the company doesn’t even get a dime out of it so if we are to ban downloading music we should ban thrift stores as thrift stores is like physical mp3 downloading only in the form of a brick and mortar store. Not a cent goes to the producer(s).

    See that wood carved rocker for 50 bucks? Not a penny goes to whom originally made it if you buy it second or even third hand aka pawn shop so those should be banned if you listen to the raving ultra right bankers.

    They have killed the computer industry which is why blogs like this haven’t been updated since 2013 and you have to use the established news now.

    Computers are threats to the globalists because computers allow independent thinking and critical research. Computers have been dumbed down to game machines pretty much and that’s most of the crowd and most of those are Europeans. Americans all they want is smartphones to do social/shopping and that’s it.

  24. Sprayandpay Says:

    There’s a battle between the ultra left that wants communism aka socialism to feed to the public and the ultra right that want a one world bank system and they are both fighting tooth and nail for power.

    The computer industry stands in their way so if they can chop it off bit by bit (no pun intended) and keep people enslaved with phone contracts it will keep the public from being wise..

    Most people who do microtransactions are phone users as straight from the start phone users don’t have a concept of owning a product. Like a regular telephone you pay the phone company the priviledge of usage and now that phones go online it’s the same thing on steroids.

    Computer users were separate of it all until modern times where it’s all the same now. The chip makers have all agreed that phones are the future and make computers more and more frustrating to use so people will give up and get a smartphone instead and be locked into apps.

  25. Sprayandpay Says:

    The government had no real interest in computing until first 9/11 that got them a little woken up but the Egypt revolution in 2011 was organized by smartphones and got the western governments to realize that if it can happen there it can happen here.

    Within days the Egypt government was overthrown by political activists that were at the right places at the right times all organized on computers and phones. After that the government got their hands on Facebook/Google and Microsoft.etc.

  26. Michael Eden Says:


    I disagree with you on your definition of “ultra left” and “ultra right.” To begin with, the Federal Reserve Act which placed the United States into this cabal of “ultra right wing domination” was foisted upon us by Woodrow Wilson, famous for being “the godfather of the progressive movement.”


    At the same time we have to do no more than look today at which political party is receiving the bulk of the big bank money: it is the DEMOCRATS.

    http://time.com/money/4554617/hillary-clinton-wall-street-backers-election/ contains this gem: Employees of the 17 largest bank holding companies and their subsidiaries have been sending her $10 for every $1 they contributed to Trump, according to a Reuters analysis. In 2012, the same group contributed twice as much to Republican candidate Mitt Romney as it did to President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign.

    People who work for hedge funds and private equity firms have contributed more than $56 million to Clinton’s presidential campaign and the supporting groups that face no legal cap on donations. Trump’s campaign and related groups received just $243,000 from donors in the same sector, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.

    You think that “communism” is somehow anathema to “a one world bank system.” You are simply completely wrong. China alone blows your model: they are communists who are perfectly FINE with megabanks. As long as they control them. But its all the left doing this at every level of technology and politics and commerce. In other words, you’ve got a great theory and the only problem with your theory is that the facts prove its wrong. I understand why you think this: its because that’s what the left keeps saying; it’s like Hillary Clinton running as a woman of ordinary means when she was worth hundreds of millions. Or the way the left says Nazism was right wing when Nazism was socialist and therefore LEFT wing. At best, one could argue that Nazism was the far right of the extreme radical left. And Nazism and communism were enemies for the same reason that Coke and Pepsi or Bloods and Crips or Barbie and Bratz dolls are enemies: they are two competing versions of a very similar thing.

    I as a fairly “ultra right wing conservative” most certainly do NOT want government control OR bank control or corporate control over my country. Who does? The left: and its true of the big banks that primarily funded Obama and then Clinton, it’s true of companies like Google and Facebook which are both totally leftist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: