I have a confession to make that always makes me rather ashamed: I subscribe to the LA Times.
The paper is a piece of trash. They routinely substitute their liberal opinions where the NEWS ought to be. But BECAUSE it is a complete piece of trash, they have t sell it for virtually nothing. The last two years, I literally received a larger gift card (this year was for Target stores) than what I paid for the subscription. And as worthless as the “newspaper” is, there are quite few valuable coupons.
Anyway, it has been rather interesting to read liberals whining about the Egyptian military and it’s “coup” to remove the Muslim Brotherhood president, Morsi.
I kind of read the Declaration of Independence, you know, the part that says this:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
And I kind of figure that, yes, you’re damn right they had a right to remove that fascist Islamic terrorist turd, Morsi after he tried to impose sharia law on an Egyptian people who very clearly did not want it. And thank God for the Egyptian military for helping the Egyptian people alter or abolish their godawful terrorist sharia law Muslim government.
But let’s deal with this line of reasoning that declares that the Muslim Brotherhood put aside its terrorism long enough to become good democrats and won an election among a disorganized and factionalized people. And that therefore the Muslim Brotherhood and Morsi ought to be able to remain in power, you know, because of the popular vote.
I remember thinking that way myself. After all, I went to the ballot box and I voted for Proposition 8. And it won with a clear majority of the people. And so according to “democracy” marriage in California is the union between one man and one woman.
Well, until a homosexual militant judge decided he didn’t like what the people had declared and decided that one man ought to overrule millions of voters.
And then until the Supreme Court – now nothing more than a political body of black robed masters – decided that the California people who had voted for Prop 8 had no legal standing. Whatsoever.
So don’t tell me that it sucks that democracy gets abrogated. I know damn well how it feels. In fact, Proposition 8 was the SECOND attempt by California voters to define marriage as the union between one man and one woman: we’d voted the same damn way for Proposition 22. It was overturned by the same genre of homosexual militant black robed masters on some incredibly trivial legal grounds, too.
But let me get back to Prop 8 as it relates to Obama. Obama was elected in November 2008 with 52% of the vote. He seemed to think it was a mandate. You know, the way voters like me probably felt that the 61% vote for Prop 22 made that a “mandate.” But of course it wasn’t, was it? Obama was re-elected in November 2012 with, again, 52% of the vote. And this time he declared that it was very clearly a mandate. But, of course, when Prop 8 passed with 52% of the vote, that most definitely was NOT a mandate at all.
What is “democracy”? It is whatever liberal fascists say it is, that’s what it is. You have a right to vote the way the Nazi “Democrat” Party wants you to vote or your vote gets thrown into the toilet bowl and flushed.
So I know damn well what it’s like to live in a third world banana republic where you get to vote as long as you vote for your dictator and his dictator regime.
What’s the difference between the people who voted for Proposition 22 and Proposition 8 and the Muslim Brotherhood? We don’t resort to rioting in the streets and murdering women and children when we don’t get our way, that’s the difference.
I suppose I should point out another difference between people like me and people like the Muslim Brotherhood – and yes, the “Democrat” Party: it is that as a conservative and a Republican and very much a Christian, I worship GOD rather than the state. Muslims, on the other hand, worship a political system masquerading as a religion, which seeks to impose a totalitarian sharia state on everyone it possibly can. And “Democrats” pretty much do the same damn fascist thing. Modern liberalism is MARXISM. Marxism is an anti-Christian blasphemy that replaces God with the State. Their Lord and Savior is the State, not Jesus Christ. They worship big government and the power of the state rather than the God of the Bible. And they are utterly wicked as a result. When you worship God, you demand a limited government to make room for a big God; when you worship the State, you demand a massive government to diminish God and usurp His place as Savior and as Lord.
The difference is the peaceful Tea Party versus the violent, out-of-control fascist liberal mob known as “Occupy.”
That, of course, is the real crux of the issue. It’s how fascist turds like Morsi and our own fascist turd Obama believe that they can win an election with a bare majority and somehow have a “mandate” to abrogate whatever previous law they didn’t like and install dictatorial bullcrap in its place (like DOMA, like immigration law, like NSA mass eavesdropping, like ObamaCare for that matter). In that last case, the “law” says that ObamaCare “shall apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.” As the article I linked to points out, “the law” very much does NOT say that “the Administration can impose the mandate whenever it feels it is politically convenient.” In this case, Obama damn well knows that ObamaCare is so disastrous and so profoundly unpopular that if it were to be implemented according to what the “law” says it must, it would be an absolute bloodbath for Democrats in November 2014. And so Obama once again decided to just ignore the damn law – even though it is his very own damn law.
Allow me to quote a prominent Democrat: “This is the law. How can they change the law?” Well, they can change the damn law if and only if they are damn fascists – which is exactly what they are.
That’s on top of the law being very clearly written as a “fee” and NOT a tax, which made it blatantly unconstitutional – until the Supreme Court decided to ignore “the law” and turn the “fee” into a “tax.” Even though that meant ignoring the “law.”
And even though key swing “Justice” Kennedy (yes, there’s those quotes again) observed that ObamaCare “changes the relationship of the Federal Government to the individual in the very fundamental way.” Because who needs that damn Constitution, anyway? When it keeps getting in “Democrats'” way?
Obama DID promise to “fundamentally transform America.” Constitution and all. So I guess we got what we “voted” for the same way Egypt got what they “voted” for when they elected terrorist turd Morsi.
Just what is “sharia law” anyway? At its most fundamental level, it is the forced imposition of a worldview upon a culture. In the case of Obama and his conversion to sodomy from promising the American people that he opposed it when he ran for president in 2008, his version of sharia is homosexual marriage – which had never existed before not only in America but in all of human civilization prior to the year 2001. Literally, the iPod is older than homosexual marriage! Liberals try to tell me I’m the one whose all about sharia because I want to preserve the understanding of marriage as it has existed from the time that the very first human being began to walk upright. They forget the fact that they are the radical ideologues who are out imposing themselves and their warped and depraved worldview onto culture that is already more than warped and depraved enough, thank you very much.
But I’m branded as “intolerant” because I agree with what the “world’s most tolerant man” promised America how he felt about marriage in 2008.
You want another example of the fact that liberals practice their own version of sharia law? Well, do you know how it is a crime according to sharia law to say something bad about Muhammad? Try going to any number of liberal-owned countries like the U.K. or Holland and try saying something bad about homosexuality. People are now being ARRESTED for saying homosexuality is a sin, as the Bible overwhelmingly declares that it is. A man went to jail for saying a police officer’s HORSE looked gay, for crying out loud. A student was told by a liberal to remove her cross at a liberal university. During the presidential campaign, liberal teachers attacked students for wearing Romney t-shirts (but never Obama t-shirts, of course). And of course liberals love to force us to quit drinking soda or force us to eat the foods they want us to eat. We just had liberals try to outlaw fires in fire pits on California beaches because of their global warming crap. Liberals are now literally trying to outlaw human behavior dating back to freaking CAVE MEN. Because liberalism equals fascism equals their own weird version of sharia. And one is as intolerant as the other.
You don’t have ANY examples of conservatives doing crap like this. Other than the fact that they stood up for the view of marriage that every civilization IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE PLANET HELD. And of course which Bill Clinton and Barack Obama falsely and dishonestly claimed that THEY supported until they had the chance to impose their fascism on society.
Liberalism is fascism, and fascism imposes itself on society by force of raw government power.
Murdering babies was wrong until it suddenly became “a right.” Sodomy was wrong until it suddenly became “a right.” Homosexual marriage was wrong until it suddenly became “a right.” And murder and rape and child molestation are next on the docket, have no doubt. Because morality is a constantly evolving thing, a spinning merry-go-round that just like “democracy” means whatever liberals say it means at any given moment.
Maybe decent people should have turned violent and started rioting and murdering people, after all? Because as our democracy is stolen by liberals one giant chunk at a time, that pretty much seems like our only recourse, doesn’t it? That was pretty much the condition our founding fathers found themselves in – having to deal with a tyrant king – and that is basically the state of affairs we find ourselves in today in this the age of Pharaoh-god-king Obama and his constant torrent of lies and abuse of his Internal Revenge Service to persecute the people on his enemies list.
In these last days, as “America” is “fundamentally transformed” into “God damn America, we’re going to increasingly begin to race toward Sodom and Gomorrah until we get the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah that we deserve. And then we’ll worship the beast and take his mark just as Revelation chapter 13 promises that we will. What will increasingly happen in the last days is that evil will so prevail and so contaminate and encompass everything that there is no “right way” but only various shades of evil. Violence will become the state of affairs because nothing else will work. But of course violence only works until the next violent group comes along as violence begets more violence.
I hope you noticed that I kept putting “Democrat” in quotes. That’s because it is a word that fascist “Democrats” intended to hearken to the term “democracy.” Only it very clearly doesn’t. Rather, it is a “homophone” – which refers to a word that sounds the same as another word but means a very different thing. “Homos” seem to be a recurring theme with the “Democrat” Party.