Orwell’s 1984 Comes Alive Under Big Brother Obama’s Regime

Well, congratulations are in order, Barack Hussein.  I mean, sure, you screwed up your hijacking of what was once the finest health care system in the world in just about every way one could possibly screw it up, but there is one thing you’ve truly excelled at: and that is making pretty much every single nightmare that George Orwell ever had come to life.

Let’s see what Orwell said about the future:

Inside the flat a fruity voice was reading out a list of figures which had something to do with the production of pig-iron. The voice came from an oblong metal plaque like a dulled mirror which formed part of the surface of the right-hand wall. Winston turned a switch and the voice sank somewhat, though the words were still distinguishable. The instrument (the telescreen, it was called) could be dimmed, but there was no way of shutting it off completely.

And:

Behind Winston’s back the voice from the telescreen was still babbling away about pig-iron and the overfulfilment of the Ninth Three-Year Plan. The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it, moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live — did live, from habit that became instinct — in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.

Let’s see how Obama brought that vision to fulfillment:

The FBI Can Turn On Your Webcam Without You Even Knowing
By Dell Cameron on December 08, 2013

Not only can the FBI activate cameras on civilian computers, but the agency has been doing so for several years. That’s according to Marcus Thomas, a former assistant director with the bureau, who spoke to the Washington Post about the controversial computer hacking technique used by law enforcement in the United States.

Most webcams come equipped with an indicator light, which alerts users when they’re being recorded. However, the FBI supposedly has the ability to disable this feature.

The tactic has been utilized “mainly” against suspected terrorists but is also used in non-terrorism related investigations, Thomas said. One issue highlighted by the Post is the difficulty law enforcement agencies face in determining jurisdiction while intercepting online communication. For instance, state or local law enforcement officers may only have the authority to perform surveillance on an individual within their state or municipal boundaries.

In April, a federal magistrate judge in Texas refused to sign a warrant because the location of an individual, who was suspected of bank fraud, could not be determined, the Post reported. While the FBI may not face the same jurisdictional limitations, it has implored Congress in the past to allow for the sharing of technical expertise with state and local law enforcement officials.

Legal limitations placed on online surveillance have long been considered a hindrance to the FBI. Compared to the National Security Agency, the FBI has been extraordinarily vocal about its intentions. The agency’s primary goal in 2013, as stated by Andrew Weissman at the American Bar Association, was to expand wiretapping capabilities to include all forms of real-time online communication, such as conversations that take place over Google chat.

Valerie Caproni, a former FBI general counsel, previously outlined the agency’s concerns before the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. “The challenge facing our state and local counterparts is exacerbated by the fact that there is currently no systematic way to make existing federally developed electronic intercept solutions widely available across the law enforcement community,” she told members of Congress.

Caproni’s testimony included descriptions of two criminal investigations, which she said illustrated the need for increased surveillance powers. The first case cited involved a narcotics investigation; the second, the distribution of child pornography. Both of these crimes, while serious violations of the law, do not constitute a threat to national security.

In 2012, the FBI was allocated $54 million by the U.S. Senate to establish the Domestic Communications Assistance Center (DCAC or NDCAC), a secretive unit charged with enhancing the U.S. government’s Internet-based wiretapping capabilities. While the exact nature of NDCAC’s operations are hidden from the public record, what is known is that customized wiretapping hardware is developed at their Quantico, Va., headquarters.

New wiretap technologies developed by NDCAC are implemented through the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), a law that requires telecommunications carriers—including Internet service providers—to accommodate government surveillance by retrofitting their equipment. In coordination with other agencies, the FBI has continuously sought to expand the authority granted to it by CALEA.

In response to questions about NDCAC, an FBI official told reporters, “The NDCAC will have the functionality to leverage the research and development efforts of federal, state, and local law enforcement with respect to electronic surveillance capabilities and facilitate the sharing of technology among law enforcement agencies.“

Law enforcement techniques generally advance to remain proportional to methods of criminals, who may be aided by new technologies while committing crimes or evading capture. However, since disclosing capabilities could weaken operations targeting dangerous criminals, critics warn that the state’s authority is subject to abuse. That’s only heightened by the digital nature of these tactics, which could prevent citizens from knowing of rights violations.

If police were to inadvertently perform a search on the wrong house, for example, the owner could take legal action against the department responsible. In contrast, if that same individual’s rights are infringed when police hack the wrong webcam, the violation is far less likely to be exposed.

The debate over state surveillance powers isn’t likely to end anytime soon. If you’d prefer to not get shy while standing in front of your appliances, you can always slap duct tape over your webcam.

What was that last sentence from Orwell?  Oh, yes:

You had to live — did live, from habit that became instinct — in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.

And voilà:

NSA Collected Info on 125 Billion Phone Calls in 30 Days
Thursday, 24 Oct 2013 03:17 PM
By Courtney Coren

The National Security Agency collected information on 124.8  billion phone calls in one 30 day period earlier this year, including about 3  billion phone calls made from the United States, according to documents  initially released by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

Data on  NSA’s Boundless Information program shows that the phone calls made during  January 2013 were monitored from all over the world, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

The top five countries where phone calls were monitored by the NSA are  Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, with the United States  coming in sixth, and Egypt and Iran taking the seventh and eighth spots,  according to information compiled by the intelligence website Cryptome  using a heat map from the  Boundless Informant program it acquired from The Guardian.

Other  countries that are consider U.S. allies such as Mexico and France are demanding answers as to why they have been  included in the United States monitoring activities.
The Foreign  Intelligence Surveillance Court gave the NSA the okay to continue collecting U.S. phone call records on Oct.  11.

Related Stories:
New NSA Spying Allegations Enrage European  Allies

Obama is the only man in the history of the world – Richard “Tricky Dick” Nixon included – who EVER used the IRS as a thug to bully, harass and intimidate his political opponents.  The crime was “anti-Obama rhetoric.”  And, yes, there is NO evidence that any progressives were targeted.

Orwell would have probably come up with a nice euphemism like “thoughtcrime,” but “anti-Obama rhetoric” is probably the best Obama’s thugs can do at this point.

I know that liberals would like to drag Bush into this hellhole that is the Stalinist little world of Obama, but I don’t remember Bush ever sanctimoniously claiming that his administration would be so “transparent” and how he would do so damn much to ensure our civil liberties and prevent executive overreach (unlike the devil Bush).  We can go back now and see those words from Obama and see what an incredibly cynical and dishonest hypocrite Obama was from the very beginning of his presidency.  We can count the damn ways that Obama was a lying hypocrite straight from hell.

It’s not like “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what” was this liar-in-chief’s only lie.  My favorite version of Obama’s lie repeated at LEAST 37 times is: “if you’ve got health insurance, you like your doctor, you like your plan — you can keep your doctor, you can keep your plan.  Nobody is talking about taking that away from you.”  Because we now know that, yes, the White House WAS talking about taking that away from you.

And we now know that Obama’s “political advisors” were telling Obama to go on lying to the American people regardless of what the policy advisors said because, well, “in the midst of a hard-fought political debate “if you like your plan, you can  probably keep it” isn’t a salable point.”  I mean, Obama HAD to lie to you, right???

The Nobel Prize people already gave Obama the Nobel Prize when he hadn’t actually accomplished Jack Squat.  So in that spirit let’s agree to give Obama the Stalinist of the Century Prize right now.  Because while there’s technically still another 87 years to go in this century, we should just give Obama all the accolades anyway, right???  And Barack Hussein has – as it is rather easy to document – done FAR more to earn the Stalinist of the Century Award than he ever did to earn his Nobel Peace Prize.

Unless they gave it to Obama for being the Best.  Fascist.  Ever.

Let’s not call things “Orwellian” anymore.  That term is outdated now that we’ve got the more accurate term “Obamian.”

Amazingly, even the quite leftist legal scholar Jonathon Turley now has this to say about the cancer of the Obama presidency:

“I have great trepidation of where we are headed, because we are creating a new system here – something that is not what was designed. We have a rising fourth branch in a system that was tripartite. The center of gravity is shifting and that makes it unstable. And within that system, you have the rise of an Uber-Presidency. There could be no greater danger for individual liberty. I really think that the Framers would be horrified by that shift, because everything they dedicated themselves to was creating political balance – and we’ve lost it.”

I laugh now when I read the horror of the New York Times when they described the “Imperial Presidency” of George W. Bush.  Because Obama’s executive overreach makes George Bush look like Ron Paul at his most libertarian moment EVER in comparison.  And Obama’s imperial presidency makes Bush’s look humble and meek by comparison.

Thanks for nothing, Big Brother Obama.  At least, until one of your many thugs sticks a cage with a rabid rat in it over my face, anyway.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “Orwell’s 1984 Comes Alive Under Big Brother Obama’s Regime”

  1. truthunites Says:

    “Thanks for nothing, Big Brother Obama. At least, until one of your many thugs sticks a cage with a rabid rat in it over my face, anyway.”

    Careful there. You might end up like this fellow, or worse!

    Arrested because he joked about Mandela: Police hold shopkeeper for eight hours, take his DNA and seize his computer – after local councillor objects to off-colour internet comments

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    truthunites,

    I think I prefer being compared to Winston from 1984 to that guy in S. Africa, given the genuine tastelessness in what he said (something to the effect of his computer was taking so long to shut down he was calling it Nelson Mandela).

    But I don’t want to suffer the fate of either one of those two, truth be said.

    Of course, your article also has the larger point of teaching that modern governments today have a PLETHORA of incredibly harsh means to get their citizens to comply. Why, our own Obama regime offers a deep IRS anal probe free of charge to all of Obama’s opposition… And that rabid rat is right around the corner now.

  3. truthunites Says:

    “Of course, your article also has the larger point of teaching that modern governments today have a PLETHORA of incredibly harsh means to get their citizens to comply. Why, our own Obama regime offers a deep IRS anal probe free of charge to all of Obama’s opposition”

    Whaddya gonna choose?

    (A) Comply. And rationalize and excuse the cowardice within? Or

    (B) Resist. And suffer the anal probe.

    (C) Resist. Fight the anal probe. Then be put down in a violent struggle. And then castigated and jeered by the mushy middlers and the cowardly conservatives for over-reacting with forceful resistance and inviting violence to the realm of peace. Not seen as a hero, not seen as a martyr, but just another stupid, senseless body to be tossed into the slag heap.

    Take your pick, Michael Eden! What choose thee? ;-)

  4. truthunites Says:

    Hi Michael,

    You write a lot of great articles on your blog. And I read lots of fine articles at other conservative blogs as well. This one comment below taunts me, however:

    Another fine article that says what no one in a position to do anything about it will say, or more importantly, actually try to do anything about.

    Regarding the comment that we are approaching the end of the opportunity to stop or reverse the headlong rush to totalitarianism, I think that point was passed in January, 2013 when barack hussein obama began his second term.

    He has pressed forward with his vow to fundamental transform America and he has at least three more years to compete the job. He is working with at least 50% full support of the voters, and 100% of the massive bureaucracy, media and academia, plus about 85% of the elected officials of both parties that constitute the legislative branch. He is in the process of packing the courts with radicals. It is all thoroughly corrupt, yet very powerful and incredibly malevolent.

    Those are close to insurmountable odds. Sadly, perhaps all that remains is to bring on the revolution, for as Thomas Jefferson once mentioned, from time to time that may be the only option. The ruling class is also prepared for that possibility, as so many indications of a domestic law enforcement buildup with tactical weapons clearly show. America has been allowed to evolve into a dictatorial police state, under the control of of a ruling class that has an insatiable appetite for power and wealth, but no respect for the common citizen or the rule of law.”

    From Here.

  5. Michael Eden Says:

    truthunites,

    I can give two responses: one as a patriot and one as a Christian.

    As a patriot, I completely agree with you. I see America as having crossed its Rubicon in 2008 and then having basically burned the side we crossed over from in 2012. There comes a point where something becomes so broken and so dysfunctional and so ruined that all one can do is replace it. This nation is done for; start over while there is still something to start over with. Or another analogy being “Old Yeller,” with America being the faithful dog that now has rabies (Obama’s “fundamental transformation”) that must now be put down no matter how hard it is to do.

    But as a Christian, “violent revolution” is simply not an option for me, personally at this point. It’s not that I’m a pacifist (I’m not) and it’s not that I believe the founding fathers were wrong for THEIR violent revolution against Great Britain (I don’t). Rather, I believe that not only as a nation, but as the human race, we are now at our end game. The beast is coming. America will fall and it will take the rest of the world down with it. Obama has ensured that will happen. Our $225 trillion in unfunded liabilities will collapse us and we will go down harder than any people in the history of the human race EVER went down simply because our debt is greater than all the peoples in the history of the human race COMBINED. I just don’t see my duty at this point to take up arms and join some fight against political tyranny at this end stage.

    It’s interesting. When the New Testament was being inaugurated (by Jesus) and written (by His apostles), we saw the most brutal and tyrant government in the form of Rome. But did Jesus or the apostles call upon us to violently overthrow Rome? No. And while I believe that there have been good revolutions since – particularly the American Revolution – I think that in the last days we’re back to the model of the first days of the Church.

    That’s what my gut tells me now.

    We’re watching Democrats doing everything they can to follow the Nazis and the Stalinists and confiscate guns or take guns away by any means possible. In California, they have taken away guns from the people by taking away the bullets that a gun needs to be a “gun” rather than a paperweight. I thought about buying an M-4 or AR-15 and decided not to. I also decided not to stock up on ammo – even though I’ve realized that the streets may be filled with violence in the aftermath of the most wildly failed “leader” who ever cursed America.

    Cloward and Piven is the inevitable consequence of Obama: a collapse, followed by a terrified and hungry people desperately calling for their government to help them – followed by Marxism and then followed by the Antichrist.

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    Take your pick, Michael Eden! What choose thee? ;-)

    truthunites,

    I frequently wear a Star of David (I’ve got two and wear one, then the other, then a cross the third day) because if (when!) they come to take the Jews, they’ll take me too.

    In the same vein, I blog as I do because when they come after all the opposition they’ll take me in the very first wave. That way I won’t have to be brave in the aftermath of seeing all the brave people who were just hauled off. I’ve talked about that before – and I was talking to you at the time!!!

    My goal is to stand up and stand against the evil government that we see growing around us that will precede the beast. But I don’t see myself going down firing off an assault rifle in a bloody battle, but rather holding a Bible in my hands preaching about what the Bible prophesied.

  7. truthunites Says:

    Preach the Gospel! Great Commission work! The harvest is plentiful and the workers are few!

    Narrow, narrow gate.

  8. Michael Eden Says:

    truthunites,

    There’s a passage from Revelation 13:10 that haunts me:

    “Anyone who is destined for prison will be taken to prison. Anyone destined to die by the sword will die by the sword. This means that God’s holy people must endure persecution patiently and remain faithful.”

    I see it happening now. I believe that within a few years, if the Rapture doesn’t come first, I will be in prison because I won’t bow down to politically correct doctrine and worship homosexuality. We’re already seeing it happen elsewhere and it’s just a matter of time now.

    I don’t know when the last time was that somebody was sentenced to prison for expressing the view that homosexuality was good. I have a feeling it has been a LONG time. But as we speak we are watching the intrinsic, pathological fascism of the left that would put me in prison just for saying homosexuality is bad.

    I’m not out to rebuke those who see what’s happening and want to fight. But my path is the path of Scripture – wherever it leads me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: