It Will Start To Happen: The Left Will AGAIN Begin To Embrace Pedophiles (Gay Marriage + Abortion For Kids = Pedophile Marriage)

I have been warning about this and lo and behold as I read the Los Angeles Slimes this morning I see it beginning.  In fact, we’ve already seen it begin.

Given that according to the doctrines of homosexual marriage, marriage is about “the right to choose” rather than about the fabric of the basic morality of a society and civilization as it had ALWAYS been throughout human history until now, and given that according to the dictates of abortion a child has the “right to choose” to kill her baby, what happens when young children want to “be” with older … lets just call them what they ARE – molesters???

The simple FACT of the matter is that every homosexual has ALWAYS had the very same right to marriage that I have had: a homosexual man, for example, has the right to marry any adult woman who will have him, the SAME AS ME.  But homosexual marriage isn’t about “rights”; it is about perversion and imposing perversion on the rest of society and ultimately it is about the celebration of perversion as a society goes completely morally bankrupt before it collapses as all other morally bankrupt civilizations have always collapsed before.

If a little girl has the right to decide to kill her baby in abortion (presupposing that she already acted on her “right” to be sexual), how is it that she doesn’t have the right to be with the man who impregnated her???  Why is a girl who is obviously – in the eyes of liberals and in the eyes of liberal judges – “adult enough” to choose a dangerous medical procedure WITHOUT HER PARENTS’ CONSENT, denied the right to be with her lover???  And given homosexual marriage, let me simply put it this way: WHO ARE YOU TO SAY THAT SUCH A RELATIONSHIP IS “WRONG”???

Think about it: in many places, “conversion therapy” (intended to “convert” gays into straights has not merely been outlawed, but literally criminalized.  Because #1 according to liberal theory, you can’t “convert” gays into straights, and #2 it is immoral to try to “convert” them because that is who they are.  Now apply that to pedophiles – because at least #1 is EVERY BIT as true for pedophiles as it is for homosexuals – and see what happens:

Pedophilia, the sexual attraction to children who have not yet reached puberty, remains a vexing challenge for clinicians and public officials. Classified as a paraphilia, an abnormal sexual behavior, researchers have found no effective treatment. Like other sexual orientations, pedophilia is unlikely to change. The goal of treatment, therefore, is to prevent someone from acting on pedophile urges — either by decreasing sexual arousal around children or increasing the ability to manage that arousal. But neither is as effective for reducing harm as preventing access to children, or providing close supervision.

And:

Recidivism among sex offenders is quite high, according to the United States Department of Justice. Although not all sex offenders reoffend, they are four times more likely than a criminal convicted of robbery, murder, assault or any other charge. Psychologists believe that recidivism is high among sex offenders because their desire to rape, molest or assault is a psychologically engrained predeliction.

Of course, homosexuality was correctly defined as a personality disorder and a mental illness in the field of psychology and yes, as “abnormal sexual behavior” – until liberals employed the doctrines of political correctness to throw reality into the trash can and replace that reality with trash.  And the same thing will ultimately happen with pedophilia.

When I was an undergraduate student at Portland State University (Piss U being one of the most liberal universities in liberaldom, as it so happens), I recall reading an article in the university journal which stated that some 80% of homosexual men had been molested as children.  The article glossed over that as being a “bad thing,” instead taking the path that however homosexuals became that way, they were queer and they were here, deal with it.  But of course first you turn somebody into a victim to create public sympathy for that person/group, and THEN you begin to assert that their behavior isn’t really all that bad and isn’t hurting anybody, and THEN you assert that their behavior is a right and even a positive thing.

And so:

Destigmatizing Pedophilia
TBC Staff
Sep 8 2011

Researchers push for APA to destigmatize pedophilia [Excerpts]

Several well-known researchers recently made unexpected arguments on pedophilia at an academic conference in Baltimore.

Liberty Counsel Action’s Matt Barber attended the conference, which was sponsored by B4U-ACT, a Maryland-based organization* of psychiatric practioners seeking to eliminate what it considers “tremendous barriers” among mental health professionals, the public, and “minor-attracted individuals” (pedophiles).

Barber says while at the conference he felt he was on a different planet, as the presenting professionals argued to remove pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). That, he believes, would mean pedophilia would no longer be considered a mental disorder.

“The entire focus of the event was on the victimhood of the pedophile,” Barber accounts. There was “very little concern for the children who are the victims of these individuals when they are raped, who these individuals lust after,” he adds.

And he says the experts’ discussions were focused on “destigmatizing pedophilia … removing the stigma, and [getting] the public to stop demonizing pedophiles.”

APA states it stands firmly behind efforts to criminally prosecute those who abuse and exploit children and adolescents. But Barber is concerned the APA is already moving toward declassifying pedophilia as a mental disorder “by saying that a pedophile is only a pedophile in their latest DSM…if they are distressed by their attractions or behaviors.”

Barber believes that would bring the APA one step closer to de-classifying pedophilia as a mental disorder, as they did homosexuality in the 1970s.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1413686

The celebration of pedophilia is coming, and when it comes, it WILL NECCESSARILY come from the left, from liberalism and from the Democrat Party.  And how will that NOT happen, given that all of the same exact arguments apply?  You can’t “cure” pedophiles; you shouldn’t stigmatize people for embracing their sexual orientation, children have a right to their own bodies, blah blah blah.

Francis Schaeffer – who understood the horror of postmodernism and the absolute dead-end it was for civilization – described a process that we are today seeing over and over again, called “moral velocitization.”  Basically, what was unacceptable yesterday begins to be welcomed by some tomorrow, endorsed by more the next day, celebrated by the media culture the day after that, and then institutionalized by liberal judges the day after that.

The celebration of pedophilia will begin the same way it always begins when the left gets behind disgusting and evil behaviors: first you make your pedophiles sympathetic victims and frankly use whatever fictions you can to make your sympathetic victims as “sympathetic” and as much of a “victim” as you possibly can, in a spin narrative designed to elicit sympathy.  Consider the case of Roe v. Wade – which was built on the lie that the woman had been GANG RAPED when she in fact hadn’t been raped at all.  Decide for yourself: who is more “sympathetic” and who is more of a “victim”?  A woman who has been gang raped or a woman who willingly had sex with nature taking its course?  The left doesn’t care about “truth” because all they want is their ideology imposed on everybody else.  And the same trick was applied to homosexuality, with homosexuals constantly described in terms of sympathetic victims who were having their “rights” taken away (even though they had the same rights to marry the same people that heterosexuals had the right to marry – they just refused and spurned their rights).

As an example, when I was searching the term “homosexual victims” I had to sort through an ocean of articles on homosexuals as “victims” of the Nazis.  What of course you really have to search for to learn is that while homosexuals ultimately DID go to the death camps, they only did so AFTER LEADING THE CHARGE FOR NAZISM.  We can likewise claim that Obama Democrats are “victims” of ObamaCare and simply ignore the fact that if it hadn’t been for them and their evil support, NOBODY WOULD HAVE BEEN VICTIMS OF OBAMACARE.  The truth is that homosexuals DOMINATED the SA – the “Stormtroopers” – that Hitler used in his rise to power to crush rival ideologies.  And the SA was gay, GAY, GAY.

As I have documented in previous articles, the homosexual rights movement used to openly include the North American Man-Boy Love Association until it became politically convenient to TEMPORARILY throw the pedophiles under the bus:

NAMBLA once actually had United Nations status, due to its membership with the “legitimate” International Lesbian and Gay Association.

NAMBLA has been a member of the International Lesbian and Gay Association for 10 years. We’ve been continuously active in ILGA longer than any other US organization. NAMBLA delegates to ILGA helped write ILGA’s constitution, its official positions on the sexual rights of youth, and its stands against sexual coercion and corporal punishment. We are proud of our contributions in making ILGA a stronger voice for the international gay and lesbian movement and for sexual justice.

Today the gay community excludes NAMBLA as a matter of pure political expediency.  Harry Hay, the founder of the first gay organization in America, ultimately condemned the “gay community” and “reviled what he saw as the movement’s propensity for selling out its fringe members for easy, and often illusory, respectability.” The simple fact is that the gay community is just a bunch of narrow-minded, intolerant bigots and naked political opportunists who want to deny others the basic rights they demand for themselves.

And, of course, President Obama appointed a pro-NAMBLA guy to be the “Safe Schools Czar,” so we have a pretty high-level endorsement right there, don’t we?  We’re talking mainstream stuff here, these days.

In other words, the left ALREADY HAS pushed for the rights of pedophiles to be pedophiles and molest our kids.  And they’re going to take it up their vile agenda again, count on it.

The first “gay president” is really also the first “pedophile president,” given that vile appointment of that vile man.

This nation already deserves to burn in hell for what it has already done, let alone what it will still do under the most wicked and demon-possessed president in our nation’s history.  We can still turn it around if enough people stand up with enough moral outrage.  But I believe it is too late for America.  And I believe the beast is coming.  And I believe that the Democrat Party will eagerly take the mark of the ultimate big government leader who will lead the world into literal hell on earth.

If you are a Democrat, you are in fact a baby-murdering sodomite worshiper.  I don’t care what you say, that’s what you ARE IN FACT given the Democrat Party’s embrace of abortion and militant homosexuality.  Don’t tell me you don’t personally support these things, that you just vote for the party and the politicians and the judges those politicians appoint who DO support it.  And like it or not, you will all-too-soon be adding child molestation to your list of abominations.

Tags: , , , ,

21 Responses to “It Will Start To Happen: The Left Will AGAIN Begin To Embrace Pedophiles (Gay Marriage + Abortion For Kids = Pedophile Marriage)”

  1. AKA John Galt Says:

    Reblogged this on U.S. Constitutional Free Press.

  2. genomega1 Says:

    Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
    It Will Start To Happen: The Left Will AGAIN Begin To Embrace Pedophiles (Gay Marriage + Abortion For Kids = Pedophile Marriage)

  3. truthunites Says:

    “If you are a Democrat, you are in fact a baby-murdering sodomite worshiper. I don’t care what you say, that’s what you ARE IN FACT given the Democrat Party’s embrace of abortion and militant homosexuality. Don’t tell me you don’t personally support these things, that you just vote for the party and the politicians and the judges those politicians appoint who DO support it.”

    Any pass given to a Low-Info Dem voter who votes liberal Dem because his/her information sources and influences are liberal Dem peers/family, and/or they believe in the demonized caricatures of Republicans and Christians?

  4. Richard M Nixon (Deceased) Says:

    Reblogged this on Dead Citizen's Rights Society.

  5. peddiebill Says:

    Although I myself am heterosexual by inclination I would have to say this post is very worrying for its judgemental, gross oversimplifications and unjust claims. None of the homosexual couples I know are child molesters, and to claim they are all perverted or that all democrats think alike on such issues is arrant nonsense. Surely, even in the US, you must have read at least some of the research showing why those with homosexual tendencies have no choice in the matter, and surely you cannot be so ignorant as to believe the eight mentions of homosexuality in the Bible are appropriate for total guidance in modern situations. I am happy to provide some further explanation although given the way this is presented I am presuming you are very unlikely to want to read anything outside your set views.

  6. Michael Eden Says:

    Although I myself am heterosexual by inclination I would have to say this post is very worrying for its judgemental, gross oversimplifications and unjust claims. None of the homosexual couples I know are child molesters, and to claim they are all perverted or that all democrats think alike on such issues is arrant nonsense

    peddiebill,

    Delaing with dishonest, abject hypocrites such as yourself disgust me more than anything else about blogging.

    You demonize me for “judgemental, gross oversimplifications and unjust claims.” And then pretty much everything you proceed to say I said is false, dishonest, and yes, a bunch of “judgemental, gross oversimplifications and unjust claims.”

    WHERE do I say that all homosexual couples are child molesters, you LIAR???

    Nor do I claim that all Democrats think alike. What I very clearly state at the end of my article is that the Democrat Party very openly supports the militant homosexual agenda and baby murdering abortion, AND THAT EVERY DEMOCRAT IS THEREFORE GUILTY OF THESE CRIMES REGARDLESS OF WHAT THEY SAY THEY STAND FOR. It’s about damn time you lying hypocrites take responsibility for what your party supports and the judges your party nominates and votes for, dammit.

    Then you proceed to demonstrate that you are as much an intellectual idiot as you are a moral one. You lecture me on “the research showing why those with homosexual tendencies have no choice in the matter.” Because apparently you are too stupid to understand that I QUOTE some of that research to apply not ONLY to homosexuals, but to PEDOPHILES to point out that the very same thing applies to them. Here is me quoting the very thing you lecture me for not reading, you hypocrite who clearly doesn’t READ:

    Pedophilia, the sexual attraction to children who have not yet reached puberty, remains a vexing challenge for clinicians and public officials. Classified as a paraphilia, an abnormal sexual behavior, researchers have found no effective treatment. Like other sexual orientations, pedophilia is unlikely to change.

    Which means that YOU YOURSELF prove the very point I was trying to make, thank you. You clearly are stating that homosexuals’ inability to choose their tendency therefore makes them innocent and good. WELL THE SAME DAMN THING IS TRUE FOR PEDOPHILES!!! Which means by the very same twisted logic you employ with homosexuals, YOU SUPPORT PEDOPHILES AND PEDOPHILIA. So thank you for literally documenting my case for me that this is the direction liberals are heading in.

    I understand that as a liberal you hate God, hate Jesus Christ, hate Christianity, hate the Judeo-Christianity that provided the foundation for Western Civilization, hate religion in general and hate pretty much everything that has to DO with religion. So I understand why you want God out of your sodomy. Eight mentions in the Bible, you say? And what is it, four mentions say homosexuality is wonderful and God loves it and four say it’s wrong and so it’s a wash??? HOMOSEXUALITY IS AN “ABOMINATION” ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE. HOMOSEXUALITY IS A “DETESTABLE THING” ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE.

    What, do you think the Bible needs to say it fifty thousand times that homosexuality is a perverted EVIL for it to somehow mean something, do you???

    So I understand why you want to marginalize the Bible and make it utterly and completely irrelevant to anything so that dishonest moral idiots like YOU can impose your “values” on us instead, you demon-possessed having such superior morality and wisdom to God and all.

    Given that the Bible is totally irrelevant as providing any sort of “guidance in modern situations,” I tremble to think what sources you believe should replace it.

    I point out to another commenter in another article how Jesus and the Scripture completely agree on the subject of homosexuality.

    No, given how irrationally and dishonestly you made up lies about what I said, I absolutely do NOT want you to “provide me with some further explanation.” There is no point dialoging with liars, peddiebill. And the way you completely misrepresented this article, that is precisely what you proved yourself to be.

  7. Michael Eden Says:

    truthunites,

    The thing is, I’ve got family members – thankfully almost all by marriage rather than by blood – who vote straight line Democrat because they believe that the Democrat Party helps people. They say they don’t support homosexuality and abortion.

    AND YES THEY DAMN WELL DO!!! EVERY SINGLE DAMN TIME THEY VOTE DEMOCRAT!!! It’s no different from a German saying I supported Hitler and the Nazis but I didn’t support the death camps. OF COURSE YOU SUPPORTED THE DEATH CAMPS, YOU DAMN NAZI!!!

    I think we can see it from the Messiah of the Democrats, Barack Obama. Democrats are people who are pathologically incapable of accepting any kind of responsibility whatsoever for the consequences of what they do or what they vote for.

  8. Michael Eden Says:

    AKA John Galt,

    Thanks much, John Galt.

  9. Michael Eden Says:

    Thanks for your work in reblogging, genomega1.

  10. Michael Eden Says:

    Richard M Nixon (Deceased),

    Thanks for your work as a reblogger.

  11. Richard M Nixon (Deceased) Says:

    My pleasure! I strive to reblog the interesting and newsworthy from around the blogosphere. Check out my other blog: http://www.deadrepublicanparty.wordpress.com

  12. HL Says:

    Michael, thank you for writing this post. Very important.

  13. Gnome Says:

    Hello, I just wanted to comment on a few things peddiebill said:

    “Surely, even in the US, you must have read at least some of the research showing why those with homosexual tendencies have no choice in the matter”

    Homosexuals may not always choose to feel a certain way, and there may be environmental factors for this. However a feeling does not justify actions. A man may feel like cheating on his wife, but choosing to act on those feelings would not make it morally right. What is a choice is choosing to engage in that lifestyle. We choose what kind of relationships to have and with whom. There have been straight men that chose to become gay and gay men that chose to become straight, so there are always choices.

    “surely you cannot be so ignorant as to believe the eight mentions of homosexuality in the Bible are appropriate for total guidance in modern situations.”

    How many times would it have to be mentioned for it to be appropriate, 10, 20 ,30? It is not merely the verses on homosexuality but those on every aspect of human sexuality that makes it a total guide. It doesn’t mater if it’s ancient or modern, human sexuality hasn’t changed and neither has truth.

  14. Truth unites... And divides Says:

    Hi Mike, I married into a liberal dem family too. There’s a mutual irritation society. Seriously, I don’t initiate political conversations, but I do answer baiting questions.

  15. Michael Eden Says:

    Truth unites… And divides,

    Fortunately, I did NOT marry into a liberal Dem family. There’s just a FEW of ’em. Conservatives outnumber libs on all sides of my family by a significant margin.

    But the liberals are so damn ANGRY and so LOUD and so DETERMINED TO HAVE THEIR WAY that you’d think it was the other way around. Fifteen conservatives walking on eggshells so as not to trip the little wire in the liberal’s brain that will make he or she just blow up into something disgusting.

    And of course, the number one “baiting question” revolves around the fact that conservatives are bad people for being intolerant of three or four years of the embrace of homosexuality whereas liberals are NOT intolerant people for pissing on 2,000 years of Western Civilization and Judeo-Christianity.

  16. Michael Eden Says:

    Gnome,

    Thanks for “jumping in.” I always appreciate help.

    My project with Peddiebill was merely to point out the FACT that he had illegitimately created several straw men which I DID NOT SAY in my article. I get that all the time from liberals: they drive by, state that I wrote things I didn’t write and that I said things I didn’t say, and because they say I wrote them and said them, I’m some kind of hater. The truth is not on their side, so dishonesty clearly seems to be their best policy.

    Your two comments are great. One of the things I’ve frequently pointed out about your first point about “how homosexuals may feel” is the FACT that there is a similar linkage with certain people and ANGER, such that a person cannot control their temper. Does that mean that this person’s anger and the things this person does with anger are not his/her fault??? Nope. At least not yet. If you get pissed off and off somebody, you go to a place called prison for it. You are completely correct: we are responsible for our feelings and what we do with them. If we have inappropriate feelings, we should know we’ve got a problem and DEAL WITH IT. Rather than allow it to own us, which is basically what homosexuality is (being owned by one’s inappropriate urges/addiction).

    I pointed out something similar to your second point (how many times should the Bible mention homosexuality?) but you took it in a different and very effective direction. You noticed that Peddiebill’s project was ultimately to make the Bible irrelevant to any discussion about morality or modern times. I was asking, “What do YOU think should then be the source for moral authority in our modern world, then?”

    This gets to a far deeper problem with secular humanism: there ARE no grounds for morality. To wit, if I am an atheist, what do I have to do such that I am not a “good atheist” the way one could easily point out that one is not a “good Christian” by comparing his or her moral behavior to the ethics of the Bible. THERE IS NOTHING. Stalin and Hitler and Mao were all “good atheists” even though they are responsible for way, WAY over the murders of 100 million people (and yes, for the official record, Hitler WAS an atheist, having been described as such by key members of his inner circle like Joseph Goebbels in private journals.

    As an example of that last, here is the entry into Goebbels’ personal diary, dated 8 April 1941 (Tues):

    “The Fuhrer is a man totally attuned to antiquity. He hates Christianity, because it has crippled all that is noble in humanity. According to Schopenhauer, Christianity and syphilis have made humanity unhappy and unfree. What a difference between the benevolent, smiling Zeus and the pain-wracked, crucified Christ. The ancient peoples’ view of God was also much nobler and more humane than the Christians’. What a difference between a gloomy cathedral and a light, airy ancient temple. He describes life in ancient Rome: clarity, greatness, monumentality. The most wonderful republic in history. We would feel no disappointment, he believes, if we were now suddenly to be transported to this old, eternal city.”

    Similarly, in a 1939 diary entry, Goebbels pointed out that Hitler had “expressed his revulsion against Christianity. He wished that the time were ripe for him to be able to openly express that. Christianity had corrupted and infected the entire world of antiquity.”

    Hitler said a bunch of things about Christianity, such as that Christianity was the invention of sick minds. Hitler was an atheist who pointed out to his inner circle that “after difficult inner struggles I had freed myself of my remaining childhood religious conceptions. I feel as refreshed now as a foal on a meadow.”

    Liberals are fascists who believe what Hitler said to the masses because Hitler spoke as the Führer of Big Government Socialism (NAZI standing for “National Socialist German Workers Party”) and to them Government is God. The morality of God must be supplanted and replaced with the “morality” of the State. They ignore the fact that Hitler was a demon-possessed LIAR who told the people one thing and told his trusted inner circle something very different (the truth).

    So what does one have to do to be a “bad atheist”??? What IS morality to these people??? And the answer is as chilling as the worst of Stalinism: it is whatever the hell they SAY it is at any given moment.

    So Obama was a “good liberal” when he said that marriage was the union between one man and one woman in 2008, and he was a good liberal for saying the exact OPPOSITE the moment political expediency enabled him to do so. Because ultimately the “morality” of liberalism is dishonesty and abject personal hypocrisy.

    I like the morality of the Bible better. Because “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the Word of our God stands forever,” whereas the “morality” of liberalism is a constantly shifting thing that always and only benefits liberals and their perversions.

  17. Michael Eden Says:

    Richard M Nixon (Deceased),

    I love you rebloggers because all I want to do is get the message out – and as far as I’m concerned, you help.

    Reblogging is actually a great concept and I wish you all the best this New Year!

  18. Michael Eden Says:

    HL,

    Thanks for the support. It is an amazing thing to watch the decline of culture as the world gets ready to worship the beast and take his mark. Hope you are happy in your New Year!

  19. dog walker Says:

    I think that post by PeddieBill might be kind of a spoof or something. I don’t know about you but where I am there is a history of all of these priests that have done the wild thing with their acolytes or alter boys. That is kind if a conspicuous counter to PeddieBill’s spoof. I mentioned that in a blog when a dialog similar to this one came up. The homos all got together and agreed that the man on boy sex was actually heterosexual pedophilia. In their minds since they could all agree on a lie it was a consensus hence true.

    My sister had an in law that was a homo. He was dying of aids so he figured he was down to nothing to lose. He would tell us of how he could tell which young boys were vulnerable or susceptible to his his charm. He shared his aids with a couple of them. This guy was one guy whose death I celebrated. At one point I seriously considered helping to expedite his process. It wasn’t because I was concerned with his suffering.

    I lived in an apartment next to homos one time. They had young boys. They also had government jobs. Educators.

    I went to Church of Religious Science a couple of times. There was a homo there with a young catamite. So PeddieBoy claims he has homo friends that aren’t pedophiles. I can say that all of the homos I have ever seen or been acquainted with were pedophiles.

    I am also pleased to say that I don’t have any homo friends. I don’t like them. I don’t like people who like them.

    It is a society of dishonor and dishonesty.

    And this is coming from a person who realizes he is not without sin.

  20. Michael Eden Says:

    dog walker,

    I can’t even come CLOSE to your contacts with the “gay community” – and I live in the Palm Springs area!!! My “closest” call in terms of living arrangements occurred when I had a condo. The owner in the unit next to me (a sweet, elderly lady) died. Her daughter lived there for a while and then she sold the place. To a homosexual couple.

    For whatever reason – good taste, perhaps – my Rottweiler who had loved the sweet elderly lady and loved her daughter DESPISED these two men. He just utterly hated them. They would come up the steps to the porch and (it was in the summer) my Rott would try to tear down the reinforced screen door to let them know he didn’t think AIDS could be transmitted through biting and wanted to test his theory in the worst possible way. Every time they would come up the steps and my dog would put up a commotion that only a Rott can. He was saying, “You’re breathing my air!”

    The gays sold the place. I truly believe my Rottweiler’s intolerance of their lifestyle was behind the move.

    Someone else moved in who were NOT homosexuals. The dog seemed to like them just fine. He’d do the eager whimper thing when they came up the steps.

    I was far happier as well. Those guys were just nasty. And that was my view as well as the dog’s.

    Now, you raise an issue about “pedophilia.” Today, according to our psychology whizbangs, we’ve got three sexual genders: male, female and children.

    You may count me among the skeptical. When I was a child I happened to know that I had a penis just like all other males and that girls had little female parts just like little girls. I even learned that in school during sexual education that had become mandatory. So even as a seven-year old, I counted TWO sexual genders. And if someone with a penis had sex with someone with a penis, the word for that was “HOMO.” Because that’s just Greek for “same or alike” the way “hetero” is the Latin prefix for “different or other.”

    So from early childhood, I have known that these psychologists – who ultimately came to find political correctness far more significant than “science” – would be utter fools. Which they officially became in 1974. There was absolutely ZERO scientific reason for the American Psychiatric Association to claim that homosexuality was anything other than the mental illness that they had always previously classified “the condition.” It was pure political liberalism altering medical science. In the same way we’ve got our global warming community screaming about “climate change” now (because “global warming” is a discredited joke and they had to come up with a new catchphrase) even in a year where we’ve had more record cold temps than record hot temps for the first time in twenty years and as we speak a Russian boat is stuck fast in Antarctic ice that no one can break through to. Here’s the funny thing: do you know why that doomed expedition was launched in the first place??? To prove that Antarctic ice was melting and thus prove global warming!!!! These colossal fools are such giant hypocrite ideologues it is beyond unreal – and all in the name of “science,” too. And I just laugh because I think about the leading “scientist” in the global warming community who used to preach that we were heading for an ice age until he started to preach that we were heading for the exact opposite thing that he used to preach about.

    We’ve seen this before, of course. The “scientific community” was so eager to “prove” evolution that they fell hook, line and sinker for every fraud and hoax that was placed in their path 100 percent of the time. They fell for the Java Man hoax. They fell for the Nebraska Man hoax. They fell for the Piltdown Man hoax. They fell for the Peking Man hoax. Oh, and there were far more of them. “Scientists” fell for ALL of them because they had a prior commitment to something OTHER THAN the truth and that something was their liberal atheist secular humanist ideology. And they made fools out of themselves in every way imaginable.

    But these fools are shameless. So your James Hansens and your Dr. David Viners (“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is“) never go away; they just get promoted to more lucrative positions.

    Understand, these “scientists” I am describing and the liberal-ideologue-propagandist media that supports them CANNOT be refuted simply because they WILL NOT be refuted. They simply cannot and will not EVER admit that they are wrong. If they are refuted by reality a trillion times, they will keep pumping out their crap. Because it is only a matter of Hitler’s Big Lie where they keep saying it until enough people believe it (read, “until enough people vote Democrat”) such that they can IMPOSE their reality – and nature be damned.

    So, yeah, I am very comfortable being a fundamentalist Christian and being open to the young earth creation viewpoint (I don’t profess to know how old the universe or the earth is and if you want to talk about the Big Bang I’ll also start talking about the need for a Big Banger). Because I know that the people who are most hostile to my position are fool ideologues who would be laughed right out of town if all of their idiocy were revealed.

    And, so, dog walker, I agree with your point: I don’t have to believe that “all” homosexuals are would-be pedophiles, but I can simply state as a fact that a whopping load of them are, given the percentage of homosexuals relative to the percentage of cases in which a man with a PENIS was sexually attracted to a boy with a PENIS.

    I point out for the factual record that over 80% of the “pedophile priest” cases actually involved teenage boys and young men. And that aint no different sexual gender from “males” unless you are an ideologue fool – which of course liberals invariably are.

    The Associated Press’ George Weigel reported: “Most clerical abusers were not pedophiles, that is, men with a chronic and strong sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children.Most of those abused (51 percent) were aged eleven to fourteen and 27 percent of victims were fifteen to seventeen; 16 percent were eight to ten and 6 percent were younger than seven. Males between eleven and fourteen account for more than 40 percent of all victims. Clerical ephebophilia (a sexual attraction to adolescents, often boys) was clearly a serious problem. But to label this a “pedophilia crisis” is ignorant, sloppy, or malicious.”

    In other words, so much of what so many people “know” through the mainstream media is a LIE. The Catholic priests you cite are obviously HOMOSEXUAL PRIESTS and can’t even be in any accurate way be classified as “pedophiles,” which we both mock anyway. Not that that mattered when the mainstream media and the “scientists” they brought in to support their lies had an agenda.

  21. Archibald Snatcher Says:

    dog walker, you celebrated someone’s death? that’s bad form.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: