One can do a search on my blog and see how vigorously I defended George Zimmerman’s right to defend himself against Trayvon Martin.
I was of course called a “racist” by the incredibly racist left for doing so, as someone reading the comments can see.
George Zimmerman was physically attacked. Only the most rabid ideologue fool refuses to acknowledge that Zimmerman was on his back getting beaten with Trayvon Martin on top of him “MMA style” raining down blows on a man who had already suffered a broken nose and serious abrasions to the back of his skull.
Liberals are fascists who do not want ordinary people to possess the right or capability to defend themselves. Period. On top of that, liberals are racist race-baiters who demonize white people and who have no compunction whatsoever to alter reality to make themselves victims. Thus George Zimmerman became a “white Hispanic” to eradicate the fact that he himself is a racial minority. And Trayvon Martin became an innocent ten-year old in the news accounts rather than a 6’3″ thug who already had had numerous encounters with the law and who by his own accounts was already glorifying in violence.
The case was a “no-brainer” from the outset. And liberals proved that they are brainless ideologues who refuse to accept the real world in their steadfast determination that George Zimmerman be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for daring to defend himself rather than placing all his trust that Obama and the State would defend him. The ONLY reason the case even ever went to trial was because Democrats are rabid fascists.
The Michael Dunn case is entirely different. And pathologically rabid liberals might be surprised to learn that I am very firmly on the side of the car-full of black kids who got shot rather than on the white man who shot them.
Michael Dunn, unlike Zimmerman’s defense, is citing the “Stand Your Ground Law.” Again, pathologically dishonest Democrats made the Zimmerman case all about that “Stand Your Ground” law even though Zimmerman’s defense NEVER cited it. And the reason that Democrats hate that law so much is that, again, they are fascists whose demons inhabiting them start twitching hysterically the moment an ordinary person is deemed to have the right to stand in any way, shape or form or to protect himself in any way, shape or form. And that is especially true – in the Democrat age of “Never bring a lawsuit against a black” – when race is involved.
George Zimmerman is Hispanic. Not a “white Hispanic” as the racist, bigoted, socialist and frankly evil New York Times branded him. Either acknowledge that Zimmerman is Hispanic, you jackals, or for the sake of any kind of honesty whatsoever STOP CALLING OBAMA AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHEN HE IS ONLY HALF AFRICAN-AMERICAN. But the fact of the matter is that Democrats are hypocrites without any kind of shame, honor, decency, integrity or virtue whatsoever. So Obama gets to be the first black president and anybody who doesn’t like Obama’s policies is a “racist” by definition while Zimmerman becomes a “white Hispanic” with the sole emphasis on his being “white” and therefore guilty.
But let’s get back to Michael Dunn.
Here’s the basic account of what happened:
Mr. Dunn, a middle-aged white man, allegedly opened fire on a car with four black teenagers in it at a Jacksonville, Fla., gas station. The boys were apparently blasting music, and when Dunn asked them to turn it down, they responded angrily. Dunn has said he felt threatened and thought he saw someone point a gun at him through the back window, so he opened fire. No gun was found in the boys’ car, and none of the witnesses to the altercation noticed a gun.
The day after last Thanksgiving, Dunn was in good spirits when he attended his son’s wedding at a historic home overlooking the St. Johns River in Orange Park, a quaint Jacksonville suburb.
But after the wedding, Dunn got into a parking lot dispute with teenagers at a gas station that ended with a 17-year-old dead and Dunn charged with murder.
Police portray the South Patrick Shores resident as an out-of-control gunman who became enraged over loud rap music booming from a nearby car, grabbed a 9mm pistol from his glovebox and fired two volleys into a Dodge Durango containing four black teens. The gunshots killed Jordan Davis and narrowly missed two other boys.
Dunn told detectives he acted in self-defense after he heard threats and thought he saw Davis raise the barrel of a shotgun above the SUV’s rear passenger window. No gun was found, police said.
Here’s the thing that makes Michael Dunn guilty:
Asked by detectives why he didn’t report the shooting by calling 911, he said he planned to drive Rouer home to Brevard County in the morning, then confess to authorities.
By 4:25 a.m. the next morning, Jacksonville police had obtained an arrest warrant and contacted the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office, looking for Dunn. A witness at the gas station had reported his license tag number.
He was arrested by deputies at about 10:30 a.m. at his condo, then taken to police headquarters in Viera for a videotaped interview with two Jacksonville detectives.
Wearing a yellow short-sleeved collared shirt and striped shorts, fidgeting and wiping his hands on his knees, Dunn related his side of the story – but neither detective bought his version of events.
Rather, they said details of Dunn’s story didn’t match those at the crime scene. Neither the surviving boys nor independent witnesses at the gas station said Davis had a firearm or tried to exit the SUV – in fact, one of the boys later said Davis couldn’t have exited a rear door because the child locks were engaged.
“If there was a shotgun coming up at you, we would expect you to do what you did. The problem that we have is, there is no shotgun. That’s the bridge that we’ve got to get across,” a detective told Dunn.
“You keep dwelling on this shotgun as if there’s one at the scene. If there was a shotgun, a BB gun, any type of gun at the scene – hell, if there was a water gun that was black that looked real at the scene. …” the detective said.
This case is NOT about race, any more than the George Zimmerman case was ever about race.
Democrats pathologically despise the Constitution or the United States and our founding fathers, unless and until these great men are perverted into deists and atheists in radical abandonment of actual history and unless and until their words are “fundamentally transformed” by liberal judges into a grotesque mockery of anything they ever actually intended their words to mean. And the words that Democrats hate only slightly less are Martin Luther King, Jr.’s words from his “I have a dream” speech:
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
Democrats hate those words. They hate the idea that the content of one’s character should matter. They want it to be exclusively about the color of one’s skin. And if you are black, you are by definition a “victim” and if you are white, you are by definition a “racist” and a “bigot” and “privileged” and therefore guilty of whatever crime Democrats want to scapegoat you with.
I think of the character in the great movie, “The Ten Commandments” named Nathan. Because he is the epitome of the Democrat Party. Like Nathan, DEMOCRATS are the real party of slavery. Democrats literally fought the damned Civil War to keep slavery while Republicans fought to liberate the slaves. The Ku Klux Klan that rode like a living cancer after that Democrat War constituted the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party who persecuted blacks and white Republicans while their fellow Democrats undid everything Republican president Abraham Lincoln tried to do in his Reconstruction Act.
I’ve documented this before, so I’ll quote myself. Who are Democrats?
The Democrat Party under Woodrow Wilson actually RE-segregated the US Military and government service (after Republicans had de-segregated them and allowed blacks to serve). The Democrat Party in 1924 was SO completely dominated by the Ku Klux Klan that the Democrat National Convention was called “Klanbake.” The Democrat Party under FDR and their New Deal was rife with racism and unions and Democrats used it to prevent blacks from getting jobs. The Democrat Party continued to be THE Party of hard-core racism for the entire history of the republic. The racist horror story of “Mississippi Burning“ was OWNED by Democrats from the Governor right on down. In fact, the state Democrat Party in Mississippi was limited to whites only. And the fact is that a FAR higher percentage of Republican Congressmen and Senators voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act than Democrats. Democrats were the Party of keeping the black man down until they cynically – incredibly cynically – saw that there was another way to keep exploiting black people to keep them on their plantation and keep them down.
The cry of Democrat blacks today is “Give us welfare or give us death.” But the two amount to the same thing as blacks have given in to bitterness, hopelessness and a spirit of entitlement rather than trying to actually fulfill the American Dream for themselves. You can either wait for your damn check to come off the work of other people or you can go out and work your ass off to make your world and your kid’s world a better place. And because of the Democrat Party, blacks have pursued the former and abandoned the latter. These are people who have fallen prey to the belief that whitey is out to get them and there isn’t any hope of a fair deal – so why try? And the only reason that is true is the same Democrat Party who told them that are the very same white people who have actually been the ones keeping them down with promises of welfare for nothing forever.
Or read my slightly different account here about who the Democrats are:
We know that FDR was a racist bigot who detested black people and allowed labor unions to exclude blacks from work that they desperately needed to survive the darkest days of America.
The question as to why black people have in recent years chosen to celebrate and support the party that put their ancestors in the chains of slavery, fought a vicious Civil War to keep them in those chains, invented the Ku Klux Klan as the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party to keep blacks who had been freed by Republicans in subjugation, resegregated blacks under the tyranny of “the father of the modern progressive movement” also known as the racist white supremacist Woodrow Wilson, was still so racist in 1924 that the Democratic National Convention of that year was called “Klanbake,” allowed black men to go untreated with syphilis so researchers could study the progression of the disease (the Tuskegee Experiment) throughout the entire FDR presidency, was largely THE party of racist discrimination through the 1950s, and then only passed the Civil Rights laws with the overwhelming supporting votes of Republicans, is a mystery that I will not attempt to explain. I have no idea why black people as a culture allowed Democrats who had subjected them to one form of plantation allowed Democrats to bait and switch them into a different form of plantation (the welfare plantation of institutional generational dependency).
Or for more modern facts, read my account here about who Democrats are:
Now, of course, you run into the irony that it was that Grand Old Party that freed the slaves, and fought a bitter war to free the slaves against the Democrat Party that was fighting just as bitterly to keep black people in the chains of human bondage. But that’s beside the point in the Democrat narrative.
Harry Reid is also on the record admiring Obama as a:
‘light-skinned’ African American ‘with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.’
Maybe it’s because Obama was half white, but Harry Reid nevertheless praises Obama for overcoming that stupid negro dialect. And being light-skinned is a huge bonus for Harry Reid. “Whiter is better” when you’re in the party of “the White Man’s Burden.”
Bill Clinton wasn’t quite as happy with the man who was stealing his white wife’s rightful place as leader of the free world.
Bill snidely told Ted Kennedy,
“A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.”
I know, William Jefferson. That’s back when southern Democrats like you had a different way of keeping black boys in their proper place.
Senator Robert Byrd, a distinguished “Exalted Cyclops” and “Kleagle” of the famous Democrat-created Ku Klux Klan, was on the record as once saying:
“I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side … Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”
Ah. There’s that depiction of blacks as being in that long-way-from-being-human I earlier mentioned.
And:
“The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia and in every state in the nation.”
When Bill Clinton honored fellow Democrat Robert “Exalted Cyclops” Byrd, Clinton said:
“He was a country boy from the hills and hollows of West Virginia. He was trying to get elected. And maybe he did something he shouldn’t have done…”
Well, as long as he was just a Democrat trying to get elected, then ANY racism or racism is fine, isn’t it, Hill Billy?
And you can read here for the massive, hypocrite double-standard that Democrats lived by when it comes to “race.”
Liberals are liars and haters. And worst of all, they are true moral idiots. “Democrat” stands for “Demonic Bureaucrat” as they seek to advance two interests: Satan’s love for 55 million murdered human beings in the abortion mills and the worship of homosexual sodomy, plus their determination to replace the God of the Bible with “the State” and make GOVERNMENT our God and Savior while increasingly marginalizing and even criminalizing the worship of Jesus Christ and the God of the Bible.
So what’s this Michael Dunn case about? I already stated it above. It is about a guilty man – and I don’t frankly give a damn WHAT color he is – who fired ten shots into a vehicle with kids inside and claimed he was being threatened with a gun when nothing even remotely resembling a gun was found at the scene.
It’s about this question: do you have the right to stand your ground with a gun? You’re damn right you do – and again, I don’t CARE if you are white or black or Hispanic or Asian or whatever. Do you have a right to whip out a gun after confronting somebody and then start shooting at them when they are no real threat to you? You’re damned right you don’t.
Michael Dunn ought to be convicted for his crime of shooting at those kids and for murdering one named Jordan Davis. And if Michael Dunn were black and the kids were white, he should be every bit as convicted.
And I say that as a conservative and a Republican rather than a racist liberal Democrat.
Tags: Florida, George Zimmerman, Jordan Davis, Michael Dunn, race, racism, Stand Your Ground law, Trayvon Martin, white Hispanic
Start Thinking Right 
February 13, 2014 at 8:41 pm
nice!