It’s really an amazing thing to see: the love affair between Islamic fascist jihadism and the progressive left.
I long ago documented Barack Obama’s LONG association with radical Islam.
You start throwing out radical names of dangerous people that Obama has been associated with and a pattern emerges: the aforementioned Davis, Jeremiah Wright (see also here and here and here), Khalid al-Mansour (more here), Rashid Khalidi, Tony Rezko, Bill Ayers. And you realize that Obama has been steeped in a profoundly Marxist worldview. Obama isn’t stupid; he knows that the American people don’t want that ideology. But no one can conceal his worldview completely. Critical observers saw it clearly.
And the left’s intimate love-affair with radical extremist (violent as hell) Islam run deep, deep, DEEP. Just recently the uberleftist Brandeis University “disinvited” a female Muslim who has refused to shut her mouth about the viciousness of Islam toward women. And the soon-to-open 9/11 Museum is taking a lot of flack because it has words such as “Islamic extremism” and “jihadism.”
This brave Muslim woman wanted to tell the truth about what is going on in the lives of these poor, oppressed women who are forced to undergo genital mutilation, endure rapes without having the right to report crimes against them, not be able to drive, not able to even leave the house without an escort, wear a giant tent called a hijab that covers everything but their veiled eyes and the tips of their feet, etc.
And how DARE she do that! It’s an OUTRAGE! And liberal Democrats are FURIOUS. Furious enough to attack her for the cardinal sin of being “intolerant.”
Hint: it sure aint Republicans getting behind these Muslim whitewashers of truth and reason.
So there’s a good question for discussion: why the hell would liberals (well, PROGRESSIVE liberals given the fact that these cockroaches have nothing to do with ACTUAL liberalism) would be such ardent supporters of the people who quite possibly despise them even more than I do.
The answer is actually very simple.
The most fundamental reason is the fact that progressive “liberalism” is based on racism and the fabrication of various racial minority groups into a voting bloc. Basically, if you recognize and affirm what a truly inferior and pathetic human being you are, and therefore see yourself as a victim of everybody and everything you disagree with, you too can be a “liberal.”
And radical Muslims – yes, terrorists like Osama bin Laden – very much and in the exact same “liberal” tradition view themselves as “victims” of the same “capitalism” and “Christendom” that progressive liberals so ardently despise.
Given that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” and given that jihadist Islamic fascists hate most of the same things that progressive liberals hate, they are bedfellows. Even though these Muslim fanatics would love nothing more than to slit the throats of every progressive liberal on the planet when they’re through using them as useful idiots and ideological human shields.
It boils down to this: if you’re a black Muslim in America today, which party and which president do you vote for?
“You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn’t care anything about. That’s a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.”
Oh, yes, when Obama campaign chief David Axelrod called Obama “black Jesus” and when liberal Newsweek editor Evan Thomas said Obama is “sort of God” and when liberal idiot Spike Lee said you can divide history into BB before Barack and AB After Barack; when Obama literally has such a God-complex that he made the whole nation and the flag which symbolizes that nation about himself, when senior Obama White House advisors literally go to churches to preach Obama; and most definitely when liberals are selling “artwork” that pictures Obama’s face and phrases such as “prophecy fulfilled,” they are mouthing Louis Farrakhan.
But you’ve got to ask, why do liberals love Islamic radicals so much? Why are the two ideologies bedfellows?
Because they’ve got an awful (and I emphasize these people are truly “awful”) lot in common besides the fact that Muslims tend to be racial minorities and therefore are held sacrosanct by the Democrat Party no matter how utterly wicked and violent and rabid they are. Not that being wicked, violent or rabid in any way, shape or form is a barrier to being a Democrat, mind you.
Other than the racial minority thing, which is frankly enough to solidify the connection between liberal Democrats and the radical jihadist fascist left all by its lonesome, Islamic fascist have three other things that progressive liberals hold dear:
The second thing that binds Islamic fascists and liberalism together is a love of fascism and the exaltation of the State as God. That is a cornerstone of both fanatic Islam and fanatic progressive liberalism alike.
Muslims refer to the concept of Khilafah. Basically, think of the world as one Muslim Caliphate. And you have the dream of Muslims.
Liberals want the same damn thing: they want one-world government. They want a mega-socialist all-powerful totalitarian State.
Now, progressive liberals might argue that Muslims want to rule in the name of God and liberals want a godlike all-powerful State that has absolute authority over human lives entirely apart from God. But in point of fact, the two become the same thing.
In North Korea, dictator Kim Il-Sung, then Kim Jong Il and now Kim Jong-Un are worshiped as GOD in their atheist state.
In the atheist state of the People’s Republic of China, Chairman Mao was likewise worshiped as GOD.
Leftists cannot help themselves. In order to BE a leftist, you have to have the insanely arrogant belief that YOU should be the one to pull or push up or down all the levers and YOU should be the one who pushes or doesn’t push all of the buttons of state. Liberals don’t believe that individuals ought to have the freedom to govern their own lives and their own affairs; rather, they feel that THEY ought to have the power to FORCE individuals to comply with what THEY want. Or else face the power of their State.
The most rabid Muslims really aren’t very different.
Put another way, both the Ayatollah AND Barack Obama love to dictate government by use of “executive orders.” See here and here for just two of myriad examples of our Thug-in-Chief’s abuse of power, of the separation of powers and of the Constitution.
The third thing both the progressive liberal left and radical Islamic jihadist fascism have in common is an utter contempt for and hostility to Christianity.
Piss Christ was the result of a liberal “artist” being paid government dollars from a VERY liberal National Endowment for the Arts program created by DEMOCRATS.
I wonder how Democrats would have voted for “Piss Mohammed.” I think all reasonable people know what these cowardly liberal cockroaches would have done.
Progressive liberal Democrats are doing everything they possibly can to advance an anti-Christian agenda to overthrow Judeo-Christianity as the moral framework for society. Because they think they’ve got a far better framework.
The fourth thing that progressive liberal Democrats and their jihadist Islamic fascists both have in common is a rabid intolerance of free speech. You need to understand why both come to the same exact perspective from opposite ends of the spectrum: for Muslims, the suppression of free speech and individual freedom and liberty is all about the fact that in Islam the individual is nothing and the Islamic State is EVERYTHING. And thus you have the right to shut up in Islam if you disagree with Sharia or the Khilafah Caliphate State. In progressive liberalism, the suppression of free speech and individual liberty is based on the opposite of Christianity: in Christianity, you are created in the image of God and you have God-given rights, including the right of free speech and individual freedom and liberty. Under progressive liberalism, you are nothing but DNA (i.e. chemicals) conditioned by your environment; you have no free will; you are merely a herd animal. And liberals view themselves as your masters who reserve for themselves the right to make all of your herd decisions for you. And so under progressive liberalism, you have the right to shut up if you disagree with political correctness or the Socialist Welfare State.
What the left has done is as fascinating as it is dishonest and hypocritical. Think of 1978 and the ACLU-backed ruling that Nazis had the right to march through a town (Skokie, Illinois) that was heavily populated by Jewish death camp survivors.
This was, of course, racism at its worst and its ugliest, given the history of 6 million Jews murdered like insects during the Nazi Holocaust.
But, under the guise of liberalism, free speech was so sacred, so sacrosanct, that even the very ugliest speech needed to be protected at all possible costs.
Now, fast forward a few decades to Donald Sterling, a man whom the left wants to strip a one-billion-PLUS dollar franchise from against his will because he said a bunch of ugly racist garbage over what he thought was a private phone line.
Let me explain what happened: liberals took advantage of free speech to get their feet and their ideology in the door and then they slammed that door shut. They don’t need it any more. You have the right to shut up. Or lose your property (like Donald Sterling) or your career (like the Mozilla CEO who committed the unpardonable sin of believing he had the freedom to donate to a political cause liberals don’t support).
Don’t tell me that the precedent of going after a racist like Sterling won’t soon be exploited to go after Christians like me who believe God rather than Obama when it comes to homosexual marriage.
Think of the bastions of liberal progressivism otherwise known as “universities.” Think of what recently came out of a liberal progressive student who basically has the same job that Obama had when HE was a liberal fanatic at Harvard:
Sandra Korn, a senior who writes a column for the Harvard Crimson newspaper, thinks radical leftism is the only permissible political philosophy, and the First Amendment only hinders colleges from brainwashing students with her viewpoint.
Stop and think (liberals being incapable of either being that as fascists they love to rush to exploit the emergency of “crisis”): liberals love the idea of destroying a Donald Sterling because, racist (LIBERAL) roach that he is, they know that they can exploit the legitimate moral revulsion against racism to “progressively” demonize OTHER areas – such as opposition to homosexuality or opposition to big government, or support for voter IDs, etc., etc. ad nauseum – to their heart’s content.
Progressive liberals, if anything, are even MORE rabidly intolerant against free speech than the most fanatic Islamic fascists.
So you see, on numerous fronts, to be a radical terrorist Muslim jihadist fascist is to be a radical totalitarian liberal progressive fascist. The two have the same basic worldview and it is therefore no surprise at all that one protects the other.
If you get in the way of the machinery of either one, they will crush you.
Tags: 9/11 Museum, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, big government, Brandeis, caliphate, free speech, hostility toward Christianity, Islamic fascism, jihadism, Judeo-Christianity, Khalid al-Monsour, Khilafah, liberlaism, Louis Farrakhan, Muslim women, Muslims, progressive liberalism, racial minority, racism, Rashid Khalidi, state, totalitiarian