A New Term For Your Lexicon: ‘Bergdahling.’ We’re Seeing Lots Of It In Iraq Right Now As Aftermath Of Obama’s Cut And Run

First the pronunciation: remember Eva Gabor in Green Acres?  Good.  All you’ve got to do is say “dahling” the way she did and then put a “berg” in front of it and you’ll nail it.

Second, the definition: it involves 1) removing your uniform and 2) deserting your position, your unit and your buddies.  Technically, in Bowe Bergdahl’s case, it also involves 3) seeking out the enemy and likely collaborating, but to seek out and join terrorists the way Bergdahl did is either so stupid or so evil or so BOTH that it’s just too far out there.  I mean, that’s the trifecta, and as the Miami Heat appear to be discovering in the NBA Finals right now, such a three-peat is not easy.

So let’s just agree to define “Bergdhaling” as removing your uniform and deserting your position in time of war.

Well, okay, you could also go another way and define “Bergdahling” as a president selling out his nation’s national security for chump change out of an idiotic belief that it will politically benefit him.  So like other words, it’s got a range and the precise meaning depends on context.  If you’re talking about a president betraying America, he’s “Bergdahling” in this latter sense.  And if you talk about a soldier “Bergdahling,” he’s doing it in the former sense above and removing his uniform and deserting his buddies.

This is – I believe – an important term today.  Because thanks to Barack Obama’s utterly disastrous and disgraceful foreign policy, we’re seeing a TON of “Bergdahling” going on in Iraq:

Gunmen seized Iraq’s second-largest city Tuesday as troops threw away their uniforms and abandoned their posts, officials said, in another blow to the authorities, who appear incapable of stopping militant advances.

Because of this contagious phenomena of “Bergdahling,” a splinter group that is actually so bad even al Qaeda says they’re too vicious has overrun three Iraqi cities, already carved out a caliphate for themselves to launch new deadly attacks against the Great Satan America, and are swearing they will take Baghdad next.  Well, to be precise, because Barack Obama GAVE them free reign to reorganize and regroup and because of “Bergdahling,” anyway.

I mean, it’s amazing, this group taking over Iraq, ISIS, was established by a rabid killer who even al Qaeda viewed as “too extreme.”

Now, according to official White House doctrine as espoused by Barack Obama’s either most or least capable liar-liar-pants-on-fire Susan Rice, the fleeing Iraqi troops are, like Bowe Bergdahl, “serving with honor and distinction.”

From the reports, 800 terrorist fighters overran tens-of-thousands of Iraqi “Berghalers.”  Don’t forget to praise their honor or their distinction as they flee.

Because, you see, when your president is a Traitor-in-Chief, treason becomes a GOOD thing rather than a BAD thing.

While Barack Obama and his former opponent become former stooge Hillary Clinton can’t comprehend it, this is very, VERY bad for America.  In a letter intercepted between al Qaeda leader al-Zawahiri to his chief lieutenant al-Zarkawi, al-Zawahiri identified four stages to the terrorist strategy: 1) Drive the Americans out; 2) establish a caliphate; 3) attack the Americans; and 4) destroy Israel.

Al Qaeda and organizations like the lethal ISIS, stronger than they have EVER BEEN thanks to the graphic, monumental failure of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, now have their caliphate in both Afghanistan and in Iraq.  And they’re going to be going back on the offense against the United States – whom they now know are the “paper tiger” we WEREN’T under George Bush – and attacking us and our interests.

It’s an interesting thing, how our enemies rightly view us as ripe for attack when Democrats occupy the White House.  Because it was under the pathetically weak cut-and-run response of Bill Clinton that Osama bin Laden first boasted

“After leaving Afghanistan, the Muslim fighters headed for Somalia and prepared for a long battle, thinking that the Americans were like the Russians,” bin Laden said. “The youth were surprised at the low morale of the American soldiers and realized more than before that the American soldier was a paper tiger and after a few blows ran in defeat. And America forgot all the hoopla and media propaganda … about being the world leader and the leader of the New World Order, and after a few blows they forgot about this title and left, dragging their corpses and their shameful defeat.”

– and began to plot his giant strike against the paper tiger that culminated on 9/11/2001.  Note that every single one of the nineteen terrorists who attacked us with our own airplanes and used them as flying bombs had planned their attack, infiltrated the United States, received their financing and had their training under the presidency of Bill Clinton.  Bush stepped into the job and didn’t have time to say much more than “how do you do?” before al Qaeda took advantage of the fact that Bill Clinton left America both weak and blind to punch us in the mouth.

I pointed this out years ago:

Osama bin Laden began to prepare for a massive attack on America. Oh, yes, he and his fellow terrorists hit America again and again: they hit the World Trade Center for the first time in 1993. In 1996 they hit the Khobar Towers where hundreds of American servicemen were living. In 1998 two embassies in Africa (Kenya and Tanzania) were bombed and destroyed by terrorists. And in 2000, terrorists hit and severely damaged the U.S.S. Cole. And Bill Clinton proved bin Laden’s thesis correct by doing exactly NOTHING.

Meanwhile, all throughout the Clinton presidency, al Qaeda was preparing to strike us. They brought in all the terrorists who would devastate us with their second attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11 2001 during Bill Clinton’s watch.

America was both weak and blind due to Bill Clinton’s gutting both the military and our intelligence capability. And of course, being blind and unable to see what was coming would hurt us deeply:

Author James Risen won the Pulitzer Prize on Tuesday for his much ballyhooed New York Times report last December that revealed President Bush’s previously secret terrorist surveillance program – a revelation he uncovered while researching his book “State of War.”

In the same book, however, Risen makes an equally explosive claim about President Clinton’s relationship with the CIA – which his editors at the Times have so far declined to cover.

Upon taking power in 1993, Risen reports, the Clinton administration “began slashing the intelligence budget in search of a peace dividend, and Bill Clinton showed almost no interest in intelligence matters.” The agency cutbacks combined with presidential disinterest took their toll almost immediately.

“Over a three-or-four-year period in the early-to-mid 1990s,” reports Risen, “virtually an entire generation of CIA officers – the people who had won the Cold War – quit or retired. One CIA veteran compared the agency to an airline that had lost all of is senior pilots . . . “

After Clinton CIA Director John Deutch cashiered several senior officers over a scandal in Guatamala, the situation got even worse.

“Morale [at the CIA] plunged to new lows, and the agency became paralyzed by an aversion to high-risk espionage operations for fear they would lead to political flaps. Less willing to take big risks, the CIA was less able to recruit spies in dangerous places such as Iraq.”

And so we were hit on 9/11 and were completely blindsided by the attack because Bill Clinton gutted the military and the intelligence budget leaving us weak and blind. And of course our spending skyrocketed because of the DotCom economic collapse that Bill Clinton left for George Bush that happened on Clinton’s watch but gutted $7.1 trillion in American wealth (almost as much as the Great Recession, btw) and which collapsed the value of the Nasdaq Valuation by fully 78% of its value as Bush was still trying to clean all the porn that the Clinton White House had left on the White House computers. And so Bill Clinton handed George Bush a massive recession and like whip cream on top of his economic disaster he handed George Bush an even more massive terrorist attack.

But, hey, don’t worry. Barack Obama is making all the same mistakes that Clinton made and then a whole bunch of even dumber mistakes that Clinton didn’t make.

Anyway, as you keep hearing that Obama will pave the streets with gold because Bill Clinton paved the streets with gold, please realize #1 that Clinton hardly ever paved the streets with gold and #2 realize that Barack Obama has not and will not govern the way Bill Clinton governed.

Maybe it’s time for more of you idiot Democrats to realize how wrong you’ve been.  Because Obama has completely failed on every front imaginable.  In Iraq, Obama rushed out of their and “ended the war.”  He wasn’t interested in bothering to even TRY to negotiate an American presence to safeguard what America had sacrificed 4,500 lives and 32,000 wounded along with billions of dollars to achieve.  The military warned Obama that his policy would end disastrously, the Republicans warned Obama that his policy would end disastrously, but Obama pulled the plug.

Just so you know how well things were going after Bush won the war, VP Joe Biden boasted:

“[It] could be one of the great achievements of this administration,” he said. “You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.”

So anybody who tries to blame this on Bush is a diseased-infested liar and if you don’t just slap some sense into that fool, don’t bother trying to talk any sense into him because he’s BEYOND sense.  Because Bush handed off a victory.  And it was such a victory that Biden tried to claim credit for it.

Since becoming president, Obama has done precisely what Osama bin Laden boasted a weak, pathetic “paper tiger” America WOULD do: we cut and ran.  Obama boasts of “ending wars” when all he did was fled and leave our enemies in a strong position to attack us again and again until we are dead and gone.

Anyway, President George Bush’s response to 9/11 so awesome and so lethal that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed- after his capture and yes, after his waterboarding – acknowledged that the American response was so massive and so overwhelming that he doubted that al Qaeda would ever dare to attack the United States again.

But he failed to realize how truly weak and truly pathetic a mighty nation like the United States could become if just one true liberal fool were ever allowed to become our president.

And now they’re right back in our faces.

And what’s Obama doing in response?  Why, he’s trading our “Bergdahlers” for the equivalent of five four-star generals.  Obama’s response is to weaken America and strengthen her enemies.

And our enemies know it.

Obama’s response – now AFTER FOUR MONTHS he’s finally even been bothered enough after all his dithering to even offer one – is “to do our part” – which he basically defines as doing NOTHING.  After Obama walked away for his weekend golf, none of our allies had any more assurance that Obama will stand by his allies and none of our enemies had any fear whatsoever.

I think of our troops who fought so hard and for so long and I just want to vomit.  Just reflect on the past week: first it blows up that our soldiers are getting the “benefit” of the bureaucratic, socialized medicine that Obama wants to impose on ALL of America when it doesn’t even work for the relatively small number of America’s veterans.  We find that our enemies in Gitmo are getting FAR better care than our troops are getting.   Then we have the Bowe Bergdahl fiasco explode, in which a deserter and very likely a TRAITOR is said to have “served with honor and distinction” while that same demonic White House demonizes every other member of Bergdahl’s unit who DIDN’T desert and who served their country.  And now we find out that Obama has blown EVERYTHING our soldiers spent the last ten years fighting for.

I am so disgusted.  So much sacrificed to win and Obama has so pissed it away that we are negative ZERO.





Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “A New Term For Your Lexicon: ‘Bergdahling.’ We’re Seeing Lots Of It In Iraq Right Now As Aftermath Of Obama’s Cut And Run”

  1. truthunites Says:

    “define “Bergdahling” as a president selling out his nation’s national security for chump change out of an idiotic belief that it will politically benefit him. So like other words, it’s got a range and the precise meaning depends on context. If you’re talking about a president betraying America, he’s “Bergdahling” in this latter sense.

    I am so disgusted.”

    Your term should be in the national lexicon.

    Like the the term “quisling.”

    A sentence: “The quisling in the White House is bergdahling, but the Libs and the RINOs in Congress refuse to hold him accountable and pursue an impeachment conviction.”

  2. FMC Says:

    This president and his horde needs to convicted of high treason and sent to the gallows. This is unbelievable! Impeachment is not enough. It won’t be long till we suffer the consequences of letting the five extremist go and it will probably be on our own soil. It is bad enough that we have outside forces trying to destroy this nation, but we are being destroyed from within the by the progressives. The consequences of this administration will be felt hard and will lead to our fall. Time is fast running out!

  3. Michael Eden Says:


    “Disgust” is the word. I’ve felt that word ever since I heard that Obama had made that trade of five terrorist commanders.

    At first I had frankly forgotten the story of Bergdahl and his obvious desertion. He was just a captured prisoner. It didn’t matter; while we should have torn apart heaven and earth to find this guy either to free our guy or to hold him accountable to justice, WE DON’T TRADE TERRORIST GENERALS FOR OUR PEOPLE.

    Now imagine my disgust when I learned all that has happened, that this guy wasn’t just a deserter but either a collaborator or a whackjob with a messiah complex (because he either went to the Taliban to betray America or he literally thought he was like Obama and could stop the rise of the oceans with his divine wonderfulness). I’ve had a sick feeling in my gut since then.

    It was a day of disgrace when America openly negotiated with terrorists to make deals. We don’t recognize evil; that’s ALWAYS been our policy. And you don’t trade prisoners of war until the war is over. And given the fact that THEY clearly didn’t surrender, that means WE did.

    All that blood and treasure in Iraq we now know has been pissed away by Obama. All the sacrifice for nothing. What we’re seeing now is WORSE than Vietnam. And of course to make it even worse Obama is doing the same cut-and-run which will have the same terrible consequence in Afghanistan as we’re already seeing in Iraq.

    It literally makes me want to cry. It’s just a sick, sad feeling.

    When we voted for Obama, we voted to surrender, to trade defeat for victory, to trade prosperity for failure, to trade greatness as a nation for mediocrity, to trade God’s blessing for God’s curse.

    I used to read the Book of Revelation and have a hard time understanding/picturing how one man could emerge who could so completely screw up the whole world without anybody being able to do anything to stop him. I suppose that’s how I’ve been “blessed”; in Obama I understand perfectly now.

  4. Michael Eden Says:


    You can’t read Romans chapter one without recognizing that the Democrat Party is the party of the wrath of God. And right now God is turning his back on this nation that has become so dominated by wickedness in only a few short years.

    I’ve said it several times in comments: the only way to prevent our national ruin is to literally hunt every Democrat down with dogs and burn them alive. I mean, Old Testament wickedness calling for Old Testament measures. But the thing is we’re not going to do that. And therefore we’re going to go down and go down hard. And America isn’t IN Bible prophecy. Whatever is left of the impoverished, disgraced shadow of “America” will soon be worshiping the beast and taking his mark on their right hands or their foreheads.

    I came to that realization after the 2012 fiasco by which we as a nation ratified that we want God’s damnation and judgment to fall upon our heads. There’s nothing we can do to change that; WE ALREADY VOTED FOR IT. And as Obama said, “elections have consequences.”

    All that is left for us is to truly embrace our faith. I don’t need more Republicans at this point; I need more Jesus.

    I thought about buying an “assault weapon” and preparing for the horrible, bloody end this nation is heading toward. But I made the personal decision not to do that.

    If I saw Barack Obama all by himself without his Secret Service, I would not harm him. If I saw Obama on the ground, I would help him up. Personal vengeance isn’t the answer for us. I believe we’re to the point where politics isn’t the answer for us. I think it’s too late and we’re headless chickens mindlessly flapping around waiting for the life to drain out of us as a nation. And then we’ll just implode and collapse.

    On my view, it’s the sort of decision a good Christian in Nazi Germany found himself in during the 1930s/early 1940s. It’s “What are you going to do?” And we can either stand for a false messiah or we can stand for righteousness both in our personal and in our public lives. We can either waste our last moments trying to “reform” our Nazi nation or we can realize that we’re ambassadors for Christ.

    But, in the words of James, I am tragically “double-minded,” because I put on a uniform for this nation and wore its flag and fought for it. And I love what it was even as much as I hate what it has become. I have a very hard time saying, “Oh, well. America was a good thing but it’s gone now. Time to move on.”

    It’s an awful feeling, being torn apart.

    But we’re going to lose. I read the Bible and I realize that. Soon, a world leader will emerge who will “socialize” the whole world. He will create the ultimate big government system. Big, human government as God, replacing God. Just as Democrats have been dreaming of and working toward for decades. It’s coming. And the mark of the beast, whereby this world leader whom God rightly sees as a “beast” will take over the entire economy of planet earth (which party wants the government to take over the economy?) such that no man can buy, sell or even BARTER without taking a mark imposed by the government. And Democrats will cheer even more loudly than they did when Obama became our tyrant and they will eagerly take that mark.

    But they will ultimately get their just desserts as they burn in hell forever and ever. Because vengeance is ultimately God’s simply because ultimately HE can do it so much better than we can.

  5. truthunites Says:

    2 thoughts.

    1. Buying and training with a firearm to protect you and your family against aggressive violence is not “assault.”

    2. Suppose you and your family are starving to death or dying of thirst and disease. You are offered a choice: take a mark on your forehead or right hand and live, or decline the mark and face sure death.

    What are you going to do Mr. Eden?

  6. Michael Eden Says:


    Fortunately, I believe that as a true believer in Jesus Christ, Jesus will rapture me right off this earth before the Antichrist emerges with his mark. But I’ll tell you what: I aint taking anything close to the mark of the big government socialist beast no matter what they do. Better to starve than to burn in hell forever and ever, which is the result of every single person who takes the mark. See Revelation 14:9-10. It’s quite clear.

    And, yeah, liberals are interesting people. Overwhelmingly, the people who go psycho with guns are LIBERALS. I mean, look at the black homicide rate – which is TWICE the rate of whites and Hispanics put TOGETHER. And then look at the Hispanic homicide rate, which of course also dwarfs whites. Realize that blacks and Hispanics vote Democrat. And then consider the fact that of the “whites,” the overwhelming majority of the nutjobs are students. And students are overwhelmingly more likely to vote Democrat than any other group of white people.

    So liberals, being rabid nutjobs, turn out to be rabid nutjobs. And if you give a liberal a gun, the rabid nutjob will start shooting people simply because liberalism = fascism.

    On top of that, the reason we have all the nutjobs out on the street in the first place is because liberals are moral idiots who years back decided that crazy people shouldn’t be forcibly confined against their will. So now thanks to Democrats it’s impossible to put somebody away until AFTER he murders. If we’re LUCKY liberals let us put him away, then.

    But somehow, the fact that a decent, law-abiding person who sees the breakdown of society and wants to protect his family becomes an act of “assault” on the people that I just pointed out were nutjobs. And, yeah, it’s a VERY nutjob view they have, isn’t it????

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: