Government Education: Please Write ‘There Is No God But Allah’ And Wear This Hijab While You’re At It. Pardon Us While We Ban Your Christianity.

This is an amazing world under our demon-possessed president:.

I want you to carefully notice that this is NOT some accident where a “teacher” (read “Obama government propaganda expert”) hastily went online and googled “Arabic sentence” and inadvertently ended up with the WORST SENTENCE IN ISLAM.  No, the form specifically points out “Here is the shahada, the Islamic statement of faith, written in Arabic.”

Please write “There is no god but Allah.  Mohammad is the messenger of Allah.”  And we’re going to grade you on how well you do it.  Just don’t you DARE ask for a Bible.”

Public School Students Told to Practice Calligraphy by Writing ‘There is No God but Allah’
By PJ Media December 16, 2015

Students at Riverheads High School in Greenville, Virginia, were told to practice calligraphy by writing out the statement “There is no god but Allah. Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.” The assignment was given by classroom teacher Cheri Laporte.

That statement is known as the Muslim statement of faith or the shahada.  The school district defended the assignment last week when it met with outraged parents.

“Neither these lessons, nor any other lesson in the world geography course, are an attempt at indoctrination to Islam or any other religion, or a request for students to renounce their own faith or profess any belief,” the district said in a statement provided to Fox News.

Parents told The Schilling Show that their children were not given the translation of what they were writing.

Riverheads High School Principal, Max Lowe, did not directly acknowledge an inquiry requesting confirmation of the incident, clarification of policy, and disciplinary measures, if any, taken against Ms. Laporte.

The school district defended the assignment.

“The statement presented as an example of the calligraphy was not translated for students, nor were students asked to translate it, recite it or otherwise adopt or pronounce it as a personal belief,” the district stated.  “They were simply asked to attempt to artistically render written Arabic in order to understand its artistic complexity.”

Further, the district said the assignment was “consistent with the Virginia Department of Education Standards of Learning and the requirements for content instruction on world monotheistic religions.”

But parents say that other religions were not represented. Parents told The Schilling Show that “the Koran was presented to students, the Bible was not. The teacher reportedly declined to provide a Bible because all the students have either read or seen a Bible.”

Female students were also encouraged to wear a hijab, it was reported.

Now, while you kiddies are practicing your taking of the oath that there IS no god but Allah and Mohammad is his Prophet with your hijabs denoting your submission to Allah, please don’t mind us as Obama takes away ANY reference to Jesus Christ or the Holy Bible.

Meanwhile, the Obama commisars at another Obama government indoctrination center censored all biblical references from a “public school” CHARLIE BROWN/PEANUTS play.  I mean, shoot, you can’t have that: Allah doesn’t like it at all and neither does his modern prophet Obama.

Meanwhile, in yet another Obama government indoctrination center, a public high school football coach was suspended for praying.  For praying SILENTLY.  The Obama government indoctrination center – also known as a “public school” – banned prayer.  They not only banned prayer, but they officially sent “a letter banning private prayer.”  That’s right: PRIVATE PRAYER.  Because don’t you kid yourself, the Obama officials KNEW he wasn’t praying to a politically correct god.

It’s really for the kids’ own good.  Because if they keep their Christian faith, they will be flunked by liberal university professors.

I simply declare as a matter of factual historical record that my title is completely true.  No Bibles for anyone, girls put on your hijab, and join with me as we all recite the shahada which is the heart of religious Islam.  It’s an amazing thing.  And it’s going to take a while to explain why liberals are doing this.

Conservatives have been pointing out the rabid fascist fanaticism developing within our ivory towers for DECADES.  But the rot has “fundamentally transformed” beyond mere cancer and is now a viral culture-killing contagion.  I can show you Harvard’s newspaper openly calling to the banning and destruction of the 1st Amendment.  I can show you rank-and-file Yale students only too happy to end microagressions and preserve “safe spaces” by abolishing the 1st Amendment and the Constitution of the United States of America that was based on liberty and freedom.

Free speech has been abolished on liberal university campuses across the United States.  And I can document that just as easily in liberal newspapers such as the Washington Post or the Los Angeles Times as I can the Wall Street Journal:

UC’s new ‘Principles Against Intolerance’ fail free-speech test

University of California considering recognizing a “right” to be “free from … expressions of intolerance”

Intolerance of intolerance: Students are ever quicker to label offensive material as hate speech

Tolerance, Free Speech Collide on Campus: A philosophical divide is at the heart of recent protests that have roiled campuses around the country

Liberals are wicked-evil-depraved-immoral people and their way is ultimately the way of Stalinism.  Which is why they literally don’t mind the Islamists who harbor the same cherished goal: a totalitarian all-powerful State.  Which is why I can take you back to 2007 when “San Francisco State University put its chapter of the College Republicans on trial for desecrating the name of Allah.”

Which only serves to show you the left’s embrace of Islam is hardly anything new.

We have entered a time when history repeats itself, with the hell of ideas that resulted in the Marxists who swiftly became the Stalinists and the Nazis who swiftly created the Holocaust emerged from ivory tower academia.  Because ideas have CONSEQUENCES.  And just as in the past, we look to our now-rabidly fascist academia system and we see the most profound tolerance to competing ideas and free speech in general every bit as bad as the Islamic State fanatics.  Former Rhodes scholar and current professor emeritus of history at University of Toronto Scarborough Modris Ecksteins – who specializes in German history and modern culture – described Nazism thus: “Nazism was a popular variant of many of the impulses of the avant-garde.  It expressed on a more popular level many of the same tendencies and posited many of the same solutions that the avant-garde did on the level of ‘high art.'” [Rights of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age, p. 311]

Rights of Spring is an interest title because it points to what was THE birth of the movement known as “modernism” that the left embraced before they abandoned it in favor of the even MORE destructive philosophical view of Postmodernism that I previously described at length (How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 1); How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 2); How Postmodernism Leads To Fascism (part 3)).  In 1913, Igor Stravinsky created a ballet he titled “The Rites of Spring.”  Rather than the traditional (i.e. conservative) graceful, stylized music and dance of the ages, Stravinsky conducted an atonal, harsh music to which his dancers moved in a ritualistic but passionate way filled with spinning and thrashing.  The idea was to portray a primitive people who had nothing to do with the “shackles” of Judeo-Christianity, who as passionate environmentalists were at one with nature and celebrating the coming of spring.  The ballet culminated in human sacrifice.  You know, like every single abortion does.

The spirit of fascism arose out of a disenchantment culminating in a rabid rejection of the traditional, Judeo-Christian worldview.  It purported itself to be both refreshingly new and yet ancient at the same time, a return to a time before factories and oil companies and global warming, in other words.  The fascists, just like their Modernist counterparts, demonized the existing Judeo-Christian civilization and proposed revolutionary new structures and values in its place.  These people were not at all interested in the discovery of truth, but the creation of “truth” through the imposition of bureaucratic (e.g. the universities) and government power.

I want you to understand something before I move on: the spirit of Postmodernism – which is the philosophical underpinning of fascism – DOMINATES the Democrat Party.  I PREDICTED the violent Occupy Movement and the 7,775 arrests these violent liberal “demonstrators” have been handed in those articles on postmodernism that I wrote in 2008.  Consider the leftist Occupy Movement and what they did and how they acted.  Versus ZERO arrests for the Tea Party that was nevertheless thoroughly demonized by the leftist propaganda machine a.k.a. the mainstream media.  And now we’ve got the vicious Black Lives Matter “protests” that has resulted in police afraid to do their jobs protecting the public while “demonstrators” chant pure evil such as “Pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon” and the chant from Obama’s pal Al Sharpton during his march: “What do we want? DEAD COPS! When do we want it? NOW!”

I want you to understand that back in 2008, I was pointing out that, just like the godless, Holocaust, ideas have consequences.  Liberalism and now the entire Democrat Party is pathologically secular humanist, atheistic, postmodernist, existentialist, deconstructionist, you name it.  And we are seeing the incredibly ugly consequences beginning to emerge.  Jonah Goldberg expressed this fact very powerfully in his great book, Modern Fascism:

For more than sixty years, liberals have insisted that the bacillus of fascism lies semi-dormant in the bloodstream of the political right.  And yet with the notable exception and complicated exceptions of Leo Strauss and Allan Bloom, no top-tier American conservative intellectual was a devotee if Nietzsche or a serious admirer of Heidegger.  All major conservative schools of thought trace themselves back to the champions of the Enlightenment – John Locke, Adam Smith, Montesquieu, Burke – and none of them have any direct intellectual link to Nazism or Nietzsche, to existentialism, nihilism, or even, for the most part, Pragmatism.  Meanwhile, the ranks of left-wing intellectuals are infested with ideas and thinkers squarely in the fascist tradition.  And yet all it takes is the abracadabra word “Marxist” to absolve most of them of any affinity with these currents.  The rest get off the hook merely by attacking bourgeois morality and American values – even though such attacks are themselves little better than a reprise of fascist arguments.

In a seminar there may be important distinctions to be made between, say, Foucault’s “enterprise of Unreason,” Derrida’s tyrannical logocentrism, and Hitler’s “revolt against reason.”  But such distinctions rarely translate beyond ivy-covered walls – and they are particularly meaningless to a movement that believes action is more important than ideas.  Deconstruction, existentialism, postmodernism, Pragmatism, relativism: all of these ideas had the same purpose – to erode the iron chains of tradition, dissolve the concrete foundations of truth, and firebomb the bunkers where the defenders of the ancien regime still fought and persevered.  These were ideologies of the “movement.”  The late Richard Rorty admitted as much conflating Nietzsche and Heidegger with James and Dewey as part of the same grand project. — Goldberg, Modern Fascism, pp. 175-176

I cited those paragraphs in another article I wrote armed with abundant evidence well over a year ago.  We are literally watching the rebirth of Nazism in the Democrat Party.  The only thing different now is that in the 1930s it was Aryan white people using racism against other people and now its the racist liberal race coalition that is using the same tactics against white people.

We talk about political correctness and many people – including those who claim to be opposed to it – have an incredibly cavalier attitude toward it.  It is incredibly dangerous and it is performing exactly as those who created intended.  Being politically correct is not just an attempt to make liberals feel better.  It is a very large, very sophisticated, very coordinated effort to change Western culture as we know it by  redefining it. Early Marxists designed their game plan long ago and the same leftists continue to execute that plan today: to control the argument by controlling the “acceptable” language.  If you use the wrong words or phraseology today, you won’t just get corrected or even screamed at; you’ll lose your job and be ruined.  Those with radical agendas understand the game plan and are taking advantage of an oversensitive, overly gullible, and frankly amoral public.

I’ve got news for you, liberal: Nazism was born out of YOUR vile mindset, not conservatism.  It was the same damn leftist artsy-fartsy elitist avant-garders in Germany doing the same damn things the same leftist artsy-fartsy elitist avant-garders are doing today in this country.

That’s why we see the same damn thing today that we saw as Nazism rose: Then as now, those who attacked democracy, ridiculed morality and celebrated violence did so in highly sophisticated ways that ultimately boiled down to “ends justify the means” arguments that are embraced by the same thug-socialists mobs who pushed Germany into Nazism.  You look at the Occupy Movement and its violent rights-abusive “occupations.”  You look now at Black Lives Matter.  And see how they openly violate other people’s free speech and other people’s rights on the SAME DAMN ARGUMENTS that we have seen before.  It was white Aryans doing it in Nazi Germany; it is black liberals doing it now.  Same abusive tactics, different screaming faces.  Just imagine the Nazis who couldn’t acknowledge that “all lives matter” because of course some of those lives were Jewish lives.  These people are DEHUMANISTS.  It’s the inevitable product that comes from the ideology responsible for the murder of sixty million innocent human beings in the abortion mills and then selling their body parts like meat at a deli.

Which again is why I can readily display the nexus between Islamic State and the American Democrat Party as BOTH are personally and morally vested in the trafficking of HUMAN BODY PARTS as the consequence of an innocent human being’s life being brutally ended by depraved people who will all one day scream in hell for what they did to human dignity.

IF you cite the Bible, you can ONLY do so as a pretense to bring in Muslims whom we CANNOT screen for terrorist connections from terrorist-ridden Syria.  Because at the core of liberalism is 1) gargantuan hypocrisy and 2) a vacuum of any legitimate transcendent values that they could actually refer to as grounds for their depraved views.

Any prayer in the name of Jesus makes the demons that inhabit Democrats’ crawl.  It is apparently an unpleasant feeling that Democrats cannot tolerate for long unless they stop that prayer.

What is funny is how liberalism is akin to a cockroach that devours her young.  Blacks, Hispanics, feminists, homosexuals, etc. think they are going to benefit from the rise of progressive liberalism (i.e., fascism), but they will ultimately be dismayed when the whip cracks down on them the way they are helping to crack the whip on Christians and conservatives and white men.  The negativism, iconoclasm, race-polarizing, divisiveness that characterizes todays special interest leftist groups to attack the established order, but just you wait until the left becomes the firmly entrenched order because suddenly any new complaint from you will be subversive to their order.  That’s exactly what happened to homosexuals as the Third Reich arose: Hitler rose to power on the homosexual-driven SA.  But when he no longer needed them and they became an obstacle to his greater rise, he ruthlessly crushed them.  And homosexuals perished in the very death camps they had helped to create.  It’s going to happen to you, too, rank-and-file liberal turd.  Because if you truly believe a Barack Obama or a Hillary Clinton give one damn about you, you are a true fool.  You are truly a means to their ends.

And when that day comes, you will have no Judeo-Christian transcendent values to appeal to – because YOU ARE THE ONES WHO DESTROYED THOSE VALUES.

But a far more awful fate ultimately awaits you:

When you’re screaming in hell for all of eternity, Democrat, just please realize that you truly deserve to be there.  YOU did all these things that unleashed hell on earth.  Your voting record caused all this wickedness to happen.  You are personally to blame and you WILL ultimately be held to account.

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse of Revelation chapter six are coming.  Any wise person can hear their approaching hoofbeats as I write these words.  They’re not coming for me, liberal, because Jesus is going to return to take me to be with Him at the Rapture of believers.  No, the Four Horsemen and the Antichrist you will soon be cheering for and worshiping are coming for YOU.  Pretty soon you’re going to get EVERYTHING you voted for; because you voted for hell and hell is coming for you first in this world, and ultimately in the world to come.

 

Cockroach Democrats Go From Supporting Bush’ War On Terror, To Claiming Being Like Bush Is Evil, To Claiming We’re Just Like Bush

If you are a Democrat, you are the lowest form of hypocrite there is, there ever has been or there ever will be.

Let me simply point out the fact that the Democrat Party voted to support George Bush’s War on Terror after the 9/11 attack, and then treasonously cut-and-ran on their duty WHILE OUR TROOPS WERE IN THE FIELD FIGHTING FOR THE WAR THEY VOTED FOR.  In fact, now-President Obama and President wanna-be Hillary Clinton BOTH voted to cut off all funding for our troops while they were still in the field fighting on foreign soil while hoping that traitors wouldn’t abandon them at home.  And at this point it is beyond obvious that the only way the United States will actually be able to end this war on terror with victory will be to hunt down every single Democrat  with dogs and burn them all alive.

Allow me to present the list of Democrat Senators who voted for George Bush’s Iraq War Resolution.  I made the list easier to see by pasting in only those Democrats who voted “yes.”  Note that the final tally of 29 Democrats voting yes – which represents very nearly 60% of all Democrats in the U.S. Senate – is cited:

Senate Roll Call: Iraq Resolution

Friday, October 11, 2002

Following is an alphabetical listing by state of how each senator voted on President Bush’s Iraq resolution. A “yes” vote was a vote to grant President Bush the power to attack Iraq unilaterally. A “no” vote was a vote to defeat the measure. Voting “yes” were 29 Democrats and 48 Republicans. Voting “no” were 1 Republican, 21 Democrats, and 1 Independent.

Arkansas		Blanche Lincoln (D): Yes
California		Dianne Feinstein (D): Yes
Connecticut	Christopher Dodd (D): Yes	Joseph Lieberman (D): Yes
Delaware	Joseph Biden (D): Yes	Thomas Carper (D): Yes
Florida		Bill Nelson (D): Yes
Georgia	Max Cleland (D): Yes	Zell Miller (D): Yes
Indiana	Evan Bayh (D): Yes
Iowa		Tom Harkin (D): Yes
Louisiana	John Breaux (D): Yes	Mary Landrieu (D): Yes
Massachusetts		John Kerry (D): Yes
Missouri	Jean Carnahan (D): Yes
Montana	Max Baucus (D): Yes
Nebraska		Ben Nelson (D): Yes
Nevada		Harry Reid (D): Yes
New Jersey		Robert Torricelli (D): Yes
New Mexico
New York	Hillary Clinton (D): Yes	Charles Schumer (D): Yes
North Carolina	John Edwards (D): Yes
North Dakota		Byron Dorgan (D): Yes
South Carolina	Ernest “Fritz” Hollings (D): Yes
South Dakota	Thomas Daschle (D): Yes	Tim Johnson (D): Yes
Washington	Maria Cantwell (D): Yes
West Virginia		Jay Rockefeller (D): Yes
Wisconsin		Herb Kohl (D): Yes

Notice also that all of the top Democrats of the time voted “yes” including Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Joe Biden and Harry Reid.

But just like Bush?  Not on your life.  Bush stayed the course; Democrats cut and ran like the cut-and-run roaches that they are.  Bush had integrity; Democrats had cynical exploitation.

And let me point out the fact that to the extent that George W. Bush failed in his war on terror, maybe – just maybe – we ought to do something DIFFERENT and not follow in the same basic fallacy that Bush pursued.  I submit that Bush made two fundamental mistakes: 1) he refused to consider the religious motivation of the Islamic jihadists and confront Islam with its profound and possibly pathological problem of religious-inspired violence; and 2) Bush wrongly believed that “democracy” was an intrinsic good and that any people who voted would vote for freedom when the fact of the matter is that bad and ignorant people will vote in a bad and ignorant way.  And I further submit that since Barack Obama’s strategy has now failed about a thousand times worse than Bush’s – realize that Islamic State emerged COMPLETELY out of the failure of Obama to fight the “war on terror” that he steadfastly refused to even acknowledge and we’ve paid DEARLY for his foolish mistake – maybe we need to pursue a completely different policy and recognize Islamic terrorism and the roots that are sustaining it for what it clearly is.

Anyway, here’s the current story framed the way Democrats want you  to see things now:

On Muslims, Democrats Find an Unlikely Ally: George W Bush
By josh lederman, associated press
·WASHINGTON — Dec 25, 2015, 1:00 PM ET

Taunted by Republicans to declare war on “radical Islamic terrorism,” Democrats are turning to an unlikely ally: George W. Bush.

President Barack Obama, under pressure to be more aggressive on terrorism, regularly cites his predecessor’s refusal to demonize Muslims or play into the notion of a clash between Islam and the West. It’s a striking endorsement from a president whose political rise was predicated on opposition to the Iraq war and Bush’s hawkish approach in the Middle East.

As Hillary Clinton put it, “George W. Bush was right.”

Don’t you DARE try to grab hold of Bush’s coattails now, you miserable ROACHES.

I just want to keep pointing out what I’ve been saying for the official record. Go back in time to early 2011 – when Obama was claiming he had healed the planet – and you’ll find me having said this.  Note in particular the bold-face and italicized paragraph:

Basically, the Judeo-Christian worldview – “Christendom,” if you like – has been treated like a salad bar in the Western Civilization that had been forged by Christianity, and secular humanists can pick out the parts that they like and throw away the rest.  But it’s not a salad bar; Judeo-Christianity as both a religion and a worldview is far more like the foundations of a great building.  And what these secular humanists have been doing is pulling out the foundational pillars one block at a time until there is nothing left to sustain the surrounding structure.

Which is precisely why the West – which used to be called “Christendom” – is now on the verge of complete collapse on virtually every level.

I see the war on terror, and from the start I have seen the glaring flaw in our strategy (yes, even when George Bush was waging it).  Basically, we have confronted totalitarian Islam on the military, political and economic fronts.  But we have utterly ignored the religious front – which is precisely the major front by which totalitiarian Islam has been attacking us.  Like it or not, 9/11 was a religious act.  And there has been no major movement whatsoever – either by the Western powers or by the movements within Islam itself – to confront the religious grounds of the totalitarian Islamists.

And the reason is because we have nothing to confront them with.  Secular humanists/atheists have undermined public religious expression at every turn, while cultural relativists have contextualized religion in such a way to strip it of any spiritual power whatsoever.  Now when we truly need true spiritual power to confront the demonic power motivating radical Islam, basically all we’ve got is allegorical dirt clods.

In the sphere of Islam, jihadists have the superior Qu’ranic argument that it is THEY who are carrying out Muhammad’s vision for Islam, not the liberal Westernized contextualizers who want to make very clear claims of Muhammad into metaphors and allegories representing something else.  Muhammad was a man of genuine violence; he had been in some thirty military campaigns in his life; he had committed numerous genocidal campaigns against “infidels”; and he had another thirty military campaigns planned at the time of his death, including the conquest of Western Europe as the means to spread Islam (“submission”) and the call of Allahu Akbar (a comparative which means “Allah is greater”).  If Muhammad is in any way, shape or form a representative paradigm of what it means to be “Muslim,” then the jihadists are right.

And liberalism – whether it be religious/theological or political/cultural liberalism – has exactly what to answer that?  Other than mocking or trivializing it?

Did political liberals – like the liberal rabbis from the LA Times article above – truly believe that we overcome the threat of terrorism by simply changing the name to “overseas contingency operation” from “war on terror”?

As bad as the religion of Allah may be for a free society, it has a great deal of force when the competition is cultural nothingness, the decaying leftovers of “salad bar pseudo-Judeo-Christianity.”

Notice I point out I’d argued this many times before, but I just don’t have the time to go back and search for my earliest argument for the fact that ignoring the very clearly Islamic tie to terrorism is and has been a giant mistake and that we cannot win if we don’t understand why our enemy keeps wanting to see us spitting blood as they jubilantly cut our heads off.

And Bush was also fundamentally wrong in his insistence that bringing “democracy” to the Middle East would make that region a better place given the simple fact that bad people will vote in a bad way.  I’ll simply put it in the words of founding father James Madison who said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”  And I’ll further point out that while Islam might be “religious” it is NOT “moral” by any Judeo-Christian standard that values human dignity and freedom.  It is no accident that while democracy emerged out of Judeo-Christianity and every single “Christian” nation has become a democracy, not one single Islamic country has EVER become a democracy in the 1,500 year history of Islam.  Asking Muslims to create a democratic republic is like asking elephants to build a space ship.  Neither is going to happen without a massive transformation in either the elephant or the Muslim.

So I just want to point out for the factual record that I don’t CARE what Bush said.  BUSH WAS WRONG.  I said it YEARS ago back when it mattered.  I said it before Obama’s horrible, godawful foreign policy that made Bush’s look like the greatest thing since sliced bread had the wheels completely fall off and we started watching in horror as Obama has since kept trying to drag the wheel-less cart by sheer undying moral idiocy rather than simply admit he was wrong.

Here are a number of article titles I came across while I was searching for the above quote that highlight rather key differences between Bush and Obama and conservatives and liberals:

• Liberal Democrat Message: Americans Who Oppose Sharia Law Being Imposed On Them Are Bigots
• This Sums Up The Demonic Hypocrisy Of The Democrat Party And Liberal Progressivism
• Do You Want To Be A Hunter And Killer Or Do You Want To Be A Hider And Cowerer? (It’s Moot: Obama Has Chosen For You)
• Obama Honors Osama Bin Laden As True Muslim Holy Warrior, Gives Him State Funeral (and please remember the hypocrisy of doing this after all the damn DENIALS that Osama bin Laden was in fact a damn MUSLIM)
• Libyans Facing Down Dictator Gaddafi Are Seriously Missing George Bush – this one is interesting because it records the statement of desperate moderate Muslims as saying “Bring Bush! Make a no fly zone, bomb the planes,” shouted soldier-turned-rebel Nasr Ali, referring to a no-fly zone imposed on Iraq in 1991 by then U.S. President George Bush.  Because Bush would have imposed that no-fly zone and Obama refused to do so like the coward he has always been and always will be.  And Libya completely melted down and ended up in terrorist hands as a result of that difference between Bush and Obama.
• Well, At Least Obama Didn’t Say ‘Endowed By Allah With Certain Inalienable Rights’
• ‘One of the prettiest sounds on earth’: A Quarter Of Americans Now Think Obama Is A Muslim
• Mainstream Media Wishes Times Square Terrorist Had Been Hated ‘Tea Bagger’ Rather Than Muslim
• Obama Allows Muslims To Opt Out Of ObamaCare; Christians Still Screwed
• Another Milestone Day For Obama: The Monstrous Mistake Of Trying Foreign Terrorists Like U.S. Citizens
• Ft. Hood Massacre: Obama Confronted By SECOND Successful Domestic Terrorist Attack

On the article from the liberal “journalist” who wishes a terrorist had been a conservative tea party member, let’s just realize how COMMON that vile attitude is among liberals.  Samual L. Jackson, actor, liberal and demonic turd, just got through telling the world that when he heard about the San Bernardino terror attack, his very first thought was “how much I really wanted that to just be another, you know, crazy white dude, and not really some Muslims.”  Because like ALL Democrats he is a pathological RACIST BIGOT who hates Americans and therefore lives in an alternate reality where it is the American white people he so despises who are guilty of all the sins in the world.  He goes on to label the sort of people who just murdered 14 human beings as ” the new young black men.”

No, don’t be comparing Obama to Bush or Democrat-fool foreign policy to Republicans.  Just DON’T.  You damn hypocrite liars.  You damn and damnable liberals are SO wrapped up and enmeshed in the Muslim Monsters who are trying to murder us it makes me sick.  You both want the same damn thing: the State worshipped as God and the people trampled upon as they are compelled to do your bidding by force.

Also keep in mind that President George W. Bush PREDICTED the meltdown in Iraq if a future fool were to try to undo what Bush had at great cost managed to finally do:

“I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.” — President Bush, 2007

Which is EXACTLY what happened because our Fool-in-Chief began his fool presidency doing the following:

US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.

Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”

So don’t EVER let ANY Democrat cite Obama now.

Bush didn’t do that.  Bush warned AGAINST doing that.  It was OBAMA who foolishly abandoned Iraq against every single one of his generals’ recommendations and them demonically and deceitfully tried to blame it on Bush and on a status of forces agreement that had NOTHING to do with Obama’s stupid decision-making.

Bush WON the war in Iraq: Vice President Joe Biden claimed that fact, saying:

“I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government,” said Biden.

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  Barack Obama claimed that fact, claiming in 2009 “an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.”

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  Even Bush’s terrorist enemies acknowledged it by saying in their radio transmissions that were intercepted, “We are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.”

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  OBAMA LOST IT BECAUSE OBAMA IS A WICKED FOOL.

Terrorism has EXPLODED under Obama by EVERY metric you want to use.  Deaths from terrorism have already QUADRUPLED under Obama; and the wicked fool’s still got over a year left that we can already see are going to be so much worse it’s not even REAL.  Realize that in the first five years of Obama’s failed rule, terrorism exploded 150 percent.   But that’s NOTHING because terrorism under Obama exploded by ANOTHER 81 percent just last year alone.  How do you think 2015 is going to look, you Democrat FOOL???

Because Barack Obama is the most demon-possessed FOOL who has EVER LIVED, we are now seeing the worst refugee crisis in the entire recorded history of planet earth.

No, Barack Obama is NOTHING like George Bush.

And the Democrat Party is the party of Satan himself.  And Satan is laughing and laughing and maniacally laughing as evil EXPLODES because he owns the soul of every single Democrat.  And that is why these sodomy-worshiping baby butchering Marxists are one day going to share Satan’s ultimate eternal destiny.

So just to recap, Democrats who demonically, treacherously and in fact treasonously betrayed and back-stabled their commander-in-chief and the troops they had voted to authorized to fight under him before they abandoned their duty are cowards and liars of the very lowest sort to now try to argue that they are the ones who are the true bearers of Bush’s mantle.

 

Honoring Meadowlark Lemon, A Great Man and Lifelong Man of God

I was just about to walk out when I heard the news that stopped me in my tracks.

It was being reported that Meadowlark Lemon had died at age 83.

A few nights ago, I saw an interesting thing: my best friend had a Christmas Eve party and I happened to see her very beautiful daughter take a picture of the food on her plate.  It actually just came up during a conversation I had with the girl’s mother by coincidence last night.  I asked what her daughter was doing and she said she was probably taking the picture for her Facebook page so her fans could see what she had for dinner.

I was stunned: I mean, WHO CARES WHAT SHE HAD FOR DINNER???

You’d be surprised, my friend told me (mind you, she IS gorgeous; and a talented singer and musician who has appeared in a couple of films, for that matter).

Maybe I should start posting what I had to eat?  NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.  Don’t worry.  Not going to happen.

I don’t even care what I eat.  I mean, if I like it, all I know is that I’ll continue to eat it until there isn’t any more of it left.  But one of the very last things on this earth I want to devote my limited span in this world to is pouring over the dietary peculiarities of another person.

Let it stand for the record that shall endure for all ages that I DO NOT CARE ABOUT KIM KARDASHEAN OR HOW MANY FACE LIFTS OR TUMMY TUCKS SHE HAD THIS WEEK.

Okay, so I don’t give a leaping fig about celebrities, I said just last night.

Except for this one.

I stopped dead in my tracks and my eyes teared up as I remembered memories that always made me smile.

I watched Meadowlark play basketball when he came to town when I was a child.  My mother watched Meadowlark Lemon play basketball when he came to town when she was a child.  My grandfather watched Meadowlark Lemon play basketball.

Even in some very dark days of racism, he was a man who transcended race.  Because he was a man who had a transcendent God and wanted to bring that God to as many people as possible.

He was a man who used every gift that he had to make people laugh without insulting anyone.  And more important, he was a man who used every gift he had to share Jesus Christ, the Savior and only the Hope of the world.

Meadowlark Lemon was a great man and a great man of God.  And I honor him and I pray for his family today.

 

Who Is Most Responsible For Knife-Wielding Laquan McDonald’s Death In Chicago? The Answer Shouldn’t Be Surprising

Now, previously, I had the pure factual evidence that the vast majority of even barely legitimate cases of police officer “executions” had occurred in cities DOMINATED BY LIBERALS.  Which is to say that in case after case of police “death squads” – as the left wants to frame them – it was LIBERAL police officers following LIBERAL guidelines in LIBERAL cities with LIBERAL police bureaucracies commanded by LIBERAL city officials who ran the whole “death squad” from start to finish.

Democrats Run The Highest Crime Cities in America
“Great job voting for one-party rule all you unions and inner-city residents. How’s that working out for you?”

Gun Crime Soaring in These Democrat-Run Cities

Gun Violence is Not a Republican Problem, It’s a Democratic Problem
Obama’s America is broken, the rest of the country isn’t.

Democrats’ Excuses for Black Crime Leads to Rise in Violence

Virtually every mass gun shooting has occurred in a Democrat GUN-FREE ZONE where the murderers know their victims will be sheep-like and utterly defenseless.  And the same phenomenon is equally true of cities with the strictest gun laws where every gun-wielding criminal has that confidence that his victim almost certainly will not have a gun because Democrats took guns away from every law-abiding citizen leaving only those who don’t follow laws to have firearms.

There are ALL KINDS of crises that DEMOCRATS have imposed on our nation’s police: cops are TERRIFIED to be proactive, to do their jobs. As a result, it is the COPS who are fearful while the CRIMINALS are emboldened.  This is in the very least a “deeply disturbing situation” because it will only be resolved by a fed-up nation finally hunting down every single liberal with dogs and burning them alive.

So when Democrats are in power, law-abiding citizens can only cower in their homes and hope the police show up.  But the police are just as scared because they now have the assurance that they will be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law if they dare to do their jobs.

And they’ve got this crap to deal with as mobs mob them if they dare get out of their squad cars.

The result because of Democrat thug tactics is summed up in this US News & World Report title:

Outrage at Police Could Bring Return of Dark Ages of Crime

I want you to note that that article was PROPHETIC because it was written LAST YEAR, ONE YEAR AGO.  And look at what’s happened to our streets as a result of these morally depraved Democrat policies that have declared war on law enforcement as liberals in crisis after crisis sided with their core special interest groups over the police.  And we live in an age of coward Democrat to the degree that Democrats CAN NOT SAY that “All Lives Matter.”  They HAVE to ONLY say “Black Lives Matter.”

But the problem is that if “all lives don’t matter,” “Black Lives” aren’t worth roach poop, either.  So pop your popcorn and watch the killings explode BECAUSE of the Democrat Party and their leftist political thug organizations like Black Lives Matter.

A couple of snippets from that above article:

• Some see the current mood of hardened positions and distrust as reminiscent of a dark era of crime 20-30 years ago in cities like New York, when police barricaded themselves in squad cars or stations out of concern for their own safety. The neighborhoods, meanwhile, crumbled.
• Without a shift in the national dialogue, the NYPD, as well as other departments across the U.S., may back away from the current approach of policing with a focus on keeping communities safe and free of even petty infractions, which many believe serves as the key to ending widespread crime.
• The subsequent backlash, particularly those from within minority communities who feel police departments don’t represent their interests, has forced some officers within the NYPD to reconsider whether such risks are worth it.“Without the support of the community, the average police officer is not going to go out of his way,” says Pete Segreti, a former NYPD officer who retired last year after 28 years, serving in a variety of assignments from beat patrols up to the Joint Terrorism Task Force. “He’s going to have a hands-off style of policing. He’s not going to go and be a proactive officer, which is what these communities need.”
• The tense of fear created by the recent Brooklyn shooting is compounded by concerns that proactive attitudes could lead to a grand jury and subsequent accusations. There’s also a belief among some in the police community that politicians no longer stand with them in unison, an issue that flared recently with charges from police unions and leaders such as former Commissioner Ray Kelly that New York Mayor Bill DeBlasio actively campaigned for election on a so-called anti-police platform.“The backlash is going to be where officers are just going to drive around in the car, and when the radio tells you to go somewhere, that’s where they’re going to go,” Segreti says, offering an old cop joke: “‘Blue Flower Pots.’ They stand on a corner, they were out there, basically, and they just stood there. They’d take a report, and that was it.”

Black Lives don’t matter one flying DAMN to any Democrat.  If black lives actually DID matter to Democrats and liberals, they would get off demonizing the police who PROTECT black lives and fixating their attention and demands for reform on the 93 percent of black victims were killed by blacks according to Politifact.

The US News & World Report article ends with this sober indictment of the Democrat Party demagogue machine and the Obama administration:

“They use force. That is the core function of the police. That’s why police get called, is to deal with something that isn’t supposed to be happening, and police can take care of the situation because they can tell someone what to do, or use force on them,” he says. “That is inherently controversial and problematic.”

“Given the nature of police [officers’] occupation, it’s just very difficult to do on a sustained basis.”

This harsh truth has been exacerbated by the mandate passed down from the federal government to city police forces to help protect America against further terrorist attacks. Police funding has now been dedicated to militarizing the force, and prioritizing quick-response training, causing fear among communities – like Ferguson – who don’t feel they understand who police officers are truly targeting.

The Brown and Garner deaths, compounded by the shooting in Brooklyn, has created a “one-two punch” that will damage police officers’ faith in the merits of engaging the community, he says.

And it could create permanent damage.

“When you get a general sense in the community that nobody cares,” warns Gosselin, “watch out. Because that’s when the real serious crimes are about to occur.”

Because of Democrat Party demagoguery, police are the ones who are scared and the criminals are the ones who feel emboldened and safe.

All that said and all that being completely true, it turns out that there is another, more direct connection between liberal Democrats and the outrageous shooting of Laquan McDonald.

I just came across something that amounts to direct evidence of the left being to blame in this egregious case of Laquan McDonald.  I came across an article from the Los Angeles Times that I shall reprint in its entirety to showcase one question that I want you to ask yourself as you look it over: why didn’t the Chicago police officers have Tasers?

Chicago police were seeking Taser when officer shot Laquan McDonald, recording shows
By Megan Crepeau and Grace Wong
December 25, 2015, 6:31 PM |REPORTING FROM CHICAGO|REPORTING FROM CHICAGO

On an October night in 2014, a Chicago police officer calmly radioed:

“Can someone get us a Taser? We’re at 40th and Keeler. This guy, ah, kind of walking away, he has a knife in his hand.”

Four minutes later, 17-year-old Laquan McDonald lay dying two blocks away, shot 16 times by an officer as the teenager held a knife and walked down the middle of the road.

Until this week, the public had seen only a silent video of Officer Jason Van Dyke shooting McDonald. On Wednesday, the city provided some of the sounds from that night, releasing redacted radio traffic between a dispatcher and officers at the scene.

Two officers had been trailing McDonald for nearly half a mile, from a trucking yard where he was allegedly breaking into vehicles and then through a Burger King parking lot. Officers called for a Taser as McDonald headed east on Pulaski Road.

“Anybody have a Taser?” the dispatcher called out. “Looking for a Taser; armed offender.”

A minute and a half passes as the officers follow McDonald. “Walking towards Pulaski from Keeler, eastbound on 40th Street. Again, armed with knife,” an officer says.

A minute later, the dispatcher repeats the call for a Taser. “Anybody close yet?” she asks. “Asking for a Taser for armed offender with a knife.”

Within seconds, an officer radios: “Popped our tire on our car, squad.” Police have said McDonald used his knife to slash the front tire of a squad car trying to block his path.

What follows is about a minute of other squad cars radioing that they are on their way to the scene. “Let me know when he’s in custody, guys,” the dispatcher says.

Eight seconds later, an officer yells out over his radio, “Shots fired by the police! It’s shots fired by the police, squad. Get the ambulance over here.”

“You guys OK?” the dispatcher asks.

“Ten-four, everything’s fine,” an officer radios back. “Roll the ambulance over here.”

The teen was alive when paramedics arrived but died on the way to the hospital, authorities have said.

According to the video, Van Dyke and his partner arrived 10 minutes after the first call. Their weapons were drawn as they stepped from their Chevrolet Tahoe. Within six seconds of exiting the police car, Van Dyke opened fire. Fifteen seconds later, he had emptied his 16-round handgun, authorities said. His partner asked him to hold his fire as Van Dyke reloaded, authorities said.

Van Dyke was charged with first-degree murder last month hours before the city finally released the video.

The city also released a copy of a 911 call earlier that night reporting that McDonald was stealing radios from trucks in a parking lot.

“Hi, I need a cop over here on 41st and Kildare,” the caller says. “I have a parking lot full of trucks, and I have a guy right here who stole the radios.”

“Are you holding this person?” a dispatcher asks.

“Yeah, he’s here,” the caller says.

After asking for directions, the dispatcher says, “OK, we’ll send the police. We will send the police.”

McDonald fled the parking lot, and responding officers saw him walking with a knife, according to police.

In releasing the audio files, the city’s Office of Emergency Management and Communications said it had redacted “private” portions of the radio traffic. That could include names, telephone numbers, home addresses and license plate numbers, the agency explained.

Crepeau and Wong are reporters for the Chicago Tribune.

In the famous words of Porky Pig, “That’s all, folks.”  That’s the whole article.

I just want you to understand how I read: I see a title that says police were seeking a Taser.  I read the story about the police dispatch looking all over the city for a damn Taser.  I read the criminal suspect is gunned down while they are still frantically looking for a Taser.  But the reporters who wrote the article inexplicably never bother to mention just why it is that the Chicago Police Department did not have Tasers for their officers who would otherwise be forced to use deadly force.

So why didn’t the offices have Tasers?  The left is completely silent.

I can show you the demand of Black Lives Matter activists in another recent case involving a black woman named Dontay Ivy:

The resolution also called for the end of Tasers used by Albany officers. Council members said the Tasing policy is something they can look into.

I can show you other cities where leftist activists called for bans on Tasers:

Police: Activists call on council for Taser controls
By Marty Levine

Outcry over whether police are using Taser stun-guns appropriately — or whether they ought to use them at all — continues to fuel calls for greater police transparency and accountability.

Local activists are calling on the police to make changes to internal rules that govern how and when Tasers may be used. They also question the recent Allegheny County medical examiner’s report that found no involvement of Tasers in the death of Andre Thomas. The Swissvale resident was hit with the Taser’s immobilizing electrical current three times during an encounter with borough police on Aug. 5. On Sept. 24, his cause of death was determined to relate only to cocaine intoxication. […]

The leftist perspective money-quote is near the end of the story:

“The most serious problem with Tasers,” Meieran concludes, “is that they are being used for pain compliance, which is nothing but a euphemism for torture.”

I can show you the leftist organization Amnesty International decrying the use of Tasers by law enforcement.  That had been an ongoing Amnesty International campaign going back years.

I can show you the attitude toward Tasers from the Chicago left back in 2010:

“The Chicago Police Department is dramatically expanding its use of Tasers, adding several hundred more and putting them in the hands of patrol officers for the first time, officials said Wednesday.

“The ‘stun guns’ will go in every squad car to give front-line beat officers a more effective way to protect themselves and calm a disturbance.

“But the electrical devices have caused controversy nationwide, with debates about their safety and lawsuits filed on behalf of dozens of people, some in the Chicago area, who have died after being ‘Tased.’

“Chicago police laid out their plans just hours after a 31-year-old south suburban man was pronounced dead after Midlothian police used a Taser to subdue him. Jaesun Ingles, of Riverdale, who was on parole, was stunned with the Taser after he tried to swallow a plastic bag that police believed contained drugs, resisted arrest and ran from officers, Midlothian police said. An autopsy by the Cook County medical examiner’s office Wednesday was inconclusive, pending further investigation.”

So just what the hell happened to all of those Tasers???  Why didn’t the police have any when they clearly needed them to avoid the very shooting that happened that the left is so batpoop about???

So I’m simply going to go ahead and call out what appears to be the rather obvious truth: the Chicago Police Department officer shot that suspect – who was CLEARLY a criminal and had already USED his knife in a violent way against police cruisers – because the left had previously removed their ability to respond with non-lethal force.

And I have a feeling that the officer who finally emptied his magazine into Laquan McDonald was watching this thug-punk walking freely down the street with cops POWERLESS to respond to him due to the “mystery of lawlessness” being unleashed by Democrats and something snapped and he said, “F#%@ this, I’ve had enough.”

And now we’re seeing the consequences.

Or let me put it another way from the left: “We’re going to take away you evil cops ability to use anything other than lethal force against hard-core criminals; THEN we’re going to demonize you for using the lethal force we left you with no choice but to use.

I would love to be allowed to perform the following experiment with a liberal.  For the record, I am a big, tall, powerful weightlifter (like many “superfelon” perps from prison weight training as we’ve long known).  Here’s the experiment: I get to come at you with a knife and the complete freedom to use it to KILL you.  You have your liberal PC words and your gun.  You frankly shouldn’t be allowed to have a gun, really, given your attitude toward guns, but you get one armed with blanks.  And ALL you have to do for me to stop my act of stabbing and slashing you to death is to draw that weapon, aim it at me, and start pulling the trigger.  Because otherwise the exercise is for keeps and I’m going to do a “snow-angel” in your blood and entrails right next to your hacked-to-death corpse.

Mind you, you COULD have possibly had an alternative to using that gun on me, BUT YOUR FELLOW DAMN LIBERALS TOOK IT AWAY FROM YOU.

Now, I’m going to bet that the vast majority of you liberals, as stupid and as foolish as you are, would draw that weapon and point it at me and start pulling the trigger to save your lives.

Too bad you vile roaches won’t let police do the same thing.

I have to mock the left again as a liberal online outfit runs an article titled, “This Is How UK Police Stop Someone With A Knife.”  The United Kingdom’s secret is to use TASERS.  You  know, the kind that the very same anti-gun left won’t let OUR police use.  While they scream at them for every single shooting.

And so the American political left literally is cynically and wickedly creating more police shootings so they can demagogue them, just as Obama is allowing terrorist attacks in the United States so he can demagogue guns and the good American people who own them.

Black Lives Matter was born out of a pure liberal lie.  It was born out of what we now have DOCUMENTED to have been a fabricated story of a white police officer shooting a black suspect who tried to surrender and said, “Hands up, don’t shoot.” It was an absolute, morally depraved lie from the left.

There are more than 900,000 sworn police officers in the U.S.  They do an incredibly dangerous job and are forced to enter tense and frantic situations where people – who may or may not be armed with deadly weapons – are acting at their very worst.  They are forced to make snap decisions which could end with one of them dead or an innocent dead as well as a criminal dead.  With that many police officers in the MILLIONS of situations they face, there will ALWAYS be some situation where the left can demonize a police officer somewhere for possibly doing something wrong in that split second that he has to react in the very worst situations any imperfect human being can face.

And like roaches, Democrat activists are swarming all over every single one of them.

And like a terrorist attack where the terrorists only have to succeed once to make a giant impact, it only takes ONE situation with ONE cop for Democrat activists to demonize and delegitimize the ENTIRETY of law enforcement.

On its face, it is seemingly bizarre that Democrats would attack the police who represent government law and order.  But here’s the thing: the police don’t represent “government” at a high enough level for Democrats.  Democrats hate our Constitution, hate the states that are the basis for our constitutional representative republic, and therefore hate the fact that states, counties and cities have any right whatsoever to be allowed to do ANYTHING they don’t like.  What they want is an Obama police force that an Obama can exploit to his political ideology; they want a “People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs” like the Soviet Union had.  And they won’t stop for anything less.

What we are watching here is nothing short of last-days “mystery of lawlessness” overtaking the United States of America and being used as a political war tactic against the American people.  We now have a Democrat Party that has officially turned against police and sided with the most lawless members of society in order to gin up the hate and fear of their political base so they will vote.  We now have a President who is openly exploiting every terrorist attack in the United States – which are all actually examples of his failure to keep us safe and protect us – as a political weapon against the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution and the American people who rely on our Constitution to be safe from crime and from the tyrants who right now inhabit our government.

 

 

Meet The REAL ‘Best Recruiter’ For ISIS: Hillary Clinton (I Am So Beyond Sick Of This ‘PLEASE Don’t Offend Muslims!’ PC Poop)

During the last debate Hillary Clinton said some flat-out lies.  Here was one of the winners that even the leftist-oriented Politifact ruled to be downright FALSE:

“We also need to make sure that the really discriminatory messages that Trump is sending around the world don’t fall on receptive ears,” Clinton said during the debate. “He is becoming ISIS’s best recruiter. They are going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists.”

In their very final words under “Our Ruling” they conclude:

Clinton said that ISIS is “going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists.”

We were unable to find any evidence to support this. The Clinton campaign did not provide any evidence that this is already happening — only that it could be happening, or that it may in the future. If ISIS was using Trump for recruitment videos, we would expect a frenzy of media coverage over it. We rate this claim False.

Okay, so Hillary LIED (again).  You can just shrug your shoulders and say, “What else is new?  The second hand spins around the clock and Hillary Clinton lies every time it moves.  But this particular lie fits a leftist narrative that desperately needs to be exposed and demonized once-for-all for the sake of our very national survival.

First of all, let’s keep going on the massive, appalling hypocrisy of Hillary Clinton’s lie that Donald Trump is somehow a recruiting tool for ISIS and that is a terrible thing.  Hey, let’s assume that Hillary is actually telling the truth (I know, we should trust a diarrhea fart while wearing white pants more than anything Hillary says) about Donald Trump being a recruiting tool for jihadists.  Let’s see who ELSE fits that illustrious company of the “offended ISIS” hall of shame:

While there is no Islamic State video featuring Donald Trump, ironically Islamic State does use videos featuring Bill Clinton as a recruitment tool.

Image credit: Live Leak Video

His image is used on Islamic State videos to represent the immorality of America – a place where the president has sex in the oval office with his intern. Islamic State calls Hillary’s husband “the Fornicator-in-Chief.”

How embarrassing to Hillary. It’s just lucky Islamic State doesn’t know about all the rumors and charges that Bill sexually harassed and even raped women and traveled three times to “Orgy Island” to visit his friend Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender. All of those charges make Hillary’s husband one of the greatest recruiting tools in Islamic State history.

Okay, so oops.  The only recruiting tool we find IS HER OWN DAMN HUSBAND AND BELOVED DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT.  And Bill Clinton isn’t the “best recruiter” for ISIS because of his warlike stance against Muslims or his harsh rhetoric; nope; he’s their best recruiter because he was a morally-depraved sex offender.  Which ought to communicate volumes about just what a great recruiting tool the Democrat Party is in their radical and evil imposition of homosexual perversion upon America.

But let’s return to Trump for a moment, since Hillary wants that so much.

Trump the insult dog mocked Hillary Clinton from that very same debate leaving at the commercial break and then showing up well after the debate resumed: “Where did she go?”

I don’t know.  Maybe she was going on her very favorite jihadi sites and desperately fact-checking ISIS videos?

You’ve got to love liberals demonizing Trump for calling out what they say is such an illegitimate and trivial thing.  You know, like when Democrats mocked and demonized Marco Rubio for drinking water last year.  You’ve got to just love the demon-possessed left when somebody takes a page from their roach play book and they whine about it.  But hey, Democrat: if you can mock somebody for drinking too much water, we can surely mock somebody for what they do after they drink too much damn water.

But I digress.  Let me refocus on the fundamental issue here: being a recruiting tool for ISIS and how awful that supposedly therefore is.

Do you have ANY idea what would be the ULTIMATE recruiting tool for ISIS?  Let me tell you in three words:

A WOMAN PRESIDENT.

Women, according to the Islam that Democrats say is so peaceful and so wonderful, are supposed to look like this:

Let me contrast this traditional Islamic view of women with tree-hugging environmentalist Democrat women from uber-liberal UC Berkeley University:

Let’s play “Where’s Waldo?”  Can you spot the object in the above picture that might offend Muslims?

I mean, where are you hijabs, girls?  And you came from a college where you were studying like only a man ought to be allowed to do?  And I KNOW you didn’t drive a car to get to that tree you’re hugging!

And you cockroach hypocrite Democrat fascists who are SO afraid of “offending Muslims” never gave so much as ONE NANOSECOND of thought to offending Christians with your “Piss Christ” and your “Holy Virgin Mary” and all the other cultural affronts that you have so routinely punched us in the face with.  Oh, no, we were just people to marginalize and demonize by Obama.  Why is that, you hypocrites without shame, without honor, without decency, without any kind of integrity or virtue?

Why is it that your cockroach values honor an incredibly violent warmonger like Mohammad but continually demonize the followers of Jesus who prophesied, “If they hate you, know that they hated Me first.”

I’m not just talking about “ISIS” here, either: I am talking about Muslims in damn near ANY Muslim country such as our “dear friends” in Saudi Arabia.

So allow me to point out that a woman president would be the ULTIMATE INSULT to Islam.  Just as a woman Secretary of State was a naked insult to a religion that really doesn’t want women showing their damn ankles, driving a car, getting an education, being allowed to vote, being allowed to testify that they were just raped, let alone wielding political power over them.

You want to give Muslims something to “radicalize” over?  You want to be “ISIS’ best recruiter”?  I’ll tell you how YOU can do it, Democrat: vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And while you’re at it, if you’re a Democrat woman, put on your damn clothes, put on your full hijab, drop out of school, stop driving your damn car (which your religion of environmentalism also ought to make you do, hypocrite!) and stay locked up in your house unless you have a male relative who will accompany you.  Because if you don’t do ALL of these things, welcome to the hall of shame of those who serve as “ISIS’ best recruiter.”

Hey, here’s another image: can you see what might offend Islam here?:

Gosh, I can’t spot a darn thing.  Oh, wait: Islam very specifically condemns homosexuality and calls for the death of homosexuals and anyone who condones it.  You know, like Obama.  Like Hillary Clinton.

So, hypocrite liberal, if you haven’t stoned a homosexual today, YOU ARE ISIS’ BEST RECRUITER.

I think about pornography and the liberal judges refusing to censor it.  Pornography has now utterly EXPLODED on the internet and the spirit of pornography is a vicious slap in the face to ANYONE who in any way, shape or form harbors any kind of moral or religious values.

You don’t think your porn radicalizes Muslims, Democrat???

Or how about this one, liberal.  A Muslim cleric once pointed out:

“When you see some people here dressed in American-style clothes, you are seeing the bullets of the West.”

WHO is making those clothes, liberal?  Are you truly so damn demon-possessed that you think REPUBLICANS are pumping out and pimping Hollywood culture???

Everything you do, liberal, EVERYTHING you do, Democrat, is a bullet aimed at Islam.  And they are shooting back at your version of “Piss Christ” poured on them in the form of your God-damned “values.”

My point here is very simple, Democrat: if it is such a horrifying thing to in any way insult Islam or offend Muslims, etc., THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP DOING IT???

Personally, I don’t give one flying RIP about offending Islam.  But then again, I am not a vile, cockroach hypocrite like every single Democrat on planet earth is, either.

There are values that are worth standing up for against anyone or anything.

If Muslims want to get offended by my values, then allow me to let this little kitty speak for how I feel.

Because unlike Democrats, I am actually capable of the moral virtue of CONSISTENCY.  I don’t demonize people for doing something while I’m doing it about a thousand times worse at the very moment I’m demonizing them for doing what I’m doing.

I have pointed out the FACT – the blatant HISTORIC FACT – that Islam has a pathological problem with violence.  We desperately need to confront Islam and Muslims on that FACT.

If we do not deal with the RELIGIOUS GROUNDS for the violence that is pouring out of Islam, we will NEVER have ANYTHING but unending war that will last beyond the dust that our Western civilization will become.  We HAVE to call out the TRUTH and be willing to STAND for that truth and FIGHT for it.

Or we need to surrender, to bear our heads to the scimitar, to welcome sharia law as our governing authority.

Which do you prefer?

You Democrats are ROACHES.  You sit there and whine and slander me because I’m “offending Muslims” and “radicalizing” them and “giving ISIL what they want.”

Terrorism has SKYROCKETED under Obama and his Democrat policies of craven cowardice.  President George W. Bush wisely predicted what would happen if a fool like Obama was elected and what Bush predicted has come to pass.  Terrorism deaths have QUADRUPLED under Obama and when the statistics come out next year they will easily more than have QUINTUPLED.  We just saw more US soldiers murdered by terrorists in Afghanistan – Obama’s response being to go golfing AGAIN – and US military deaths in Afghanistan had ALREADY skyrocketed under Obama because Obama emboldened the enemy with a plan for withdrawal (surrender).  At home, the very mass shootings Obama keeps demagoguing have skyrocketed 700% under his ROACH rule.  Obama has proven that “ISIS’ best recruiter” is WEAKNESS and lack of resolve before Islamic terrorism and the religious values that inspire it.

Hey, you turds: if Islamic State wants me to condemn Islam because it helps them recruit they just as much want YOU to serve as the ultimate recruiting tool by offending everything that Islam stands for with your perverted leftist “values.”

So for the sake of everything that has any integrity whatsoever, please either stop bitching about this “ISIS’ best recruiter” crap or abolish the Democrat Party as the ultimate insult to Islam that it is.

Me, I’m going to keep standing up for the truth, and for what is truly right.  And I frankly don’t care who I offend while I’m at it.

 

 

 

 

 

‘Most Hated CEO In America’ Who Skyrocketed Price Of HIV Drug WAS A DEMOCRAT WHO DONATED TENS OF THOUSANDS TO DEMOCRATS

You listen to the Democrats debate (okay, the three of you who do, given that the DNC has done EVERYTHING to protect their Fuehrer, Hillary Clinton, from any scrutiny by sandwiching debates into THE worst time slots – for example, the first Saturday night of Christmas Vacation, the next one being on a night with two NFL playoff games) and you hear the Democrat candidates utterly fail to explain things such as:

• Why is income inequality is worse UNDER OBAMA than it has EVER been in America since 1928 (and yes, Democrat, FAR worse than under Bush)?
• Why do you Democrats continue to demagogue wealth inequality when DEMOCRATS and DEMOCRAT POLICIES caused it?
• Why is it that Democrats claim their socialist wealth redistribution policies work when in fact their policies have made things SO DAMN BAD that the American people would RIOT IN THE STREETS if they learned how truly unfair Obama’s fascism has made America?  Why is it that Democrats continue to claim that a partisan political machine picking winners and losers – that has ALWAYS benefitted a few at the expense of the many – and forcing their failed “solutions” on the very businesses we desperately need so anyone can have a damn job is still somehow the way to go?  The question Democrats candidates should be asked is why they rabidly continue to pursue a failed model based on bogus principles when history proves it fails every time it is tried?
• Consider an article I wrote in 2012 about Obama’s disastrous labor participation rate – the percentage of working-age Americans who actually have a damn job – and how it has declined and declined and declined during HIS presidency such that it is now the worst in 38 years.  Considering that 38 years ago in 1977 many married wives did not HAVE to work who now DO have to work, this 38-year-low – that I document got worse and worse because of Obama’s failed policies – is actually far worse than it looks.  Given that Obama’s socialist-liberal policies caused this disaster to become so much worse, why do Democrats stupidly believe that more of what broke the thing should make the thing that got broke better?
• Why health care premiums for those who already had healthcare skyrocketed 27% with premiums skyrocketing 67% because of ObamaCare (rising SEVEN TIMES faster than inflation,fwiw).
• Why ObamaCare is entering the very “death spiral” that Republicans WARNED YOU ABOUT as the entire ObamaCare model of shoving increasingly sick people into the system with the expectation that healthy young people would subsidize by paying massively more than they should have is rapidly breaking down.
• Tying the economy and ObamaCare together, even Hillary Clinton has now acknowledged the obvious damn FACT that Republicans warned about that ObamaCare would increasingly obliterate full-time jobs.  Go back to my 2011 article when I told you “ObamaCare is a Death Panel for JOBS.”  Consider my article “Nearly HALF Of All Small Businesses Have Curbed Their Hiring As A Result Of ObamaCare” and understand: if you impose a requirement as Democrats did that any job with more than 30 hours a week is “full time” and therefore must pay increasingly escalating ObamaCare for all workers, what you DO is force employers to give workers fewer than 30 hours a week.
• Why if terrorism was all Bush’s fault we now have terrorism absolutely skyrocketing in the Obama era.

With all of those questions that Democrats don’t have to give a fig about answering and any “answer” they give would be in a debate that the DNC has intentionally done everything possible to prevent anyone from wanting to watch, anyway (see here and here), something interesting has emerged:

Is it REALLY “evil Republican corporations” that are screwing you, America?

Nope.

Let’s look at a truly horrible man:

Martin Shkreli: The ‘most hated man in America’ is raising the price of another form of drug
The news comes just after he raises the price of an effective HIV drug by more than 5000 per cent 
Will Grice ||
Saturday 12 December 2015|

The man who increased the cost of an effective HIV drug by 5,500 per cent has now increased the price of another form of medicine.

Martin Shkreli has now increased the price of a medicine used to treat Chagas disease, a parasitic infection that can cause heart failure.

Mr Shkreli’s company, Turing Pharmacuticals, previously acquired the rights to the anti-HIV drug, Daraprim, before increasing the price from $13.50 to  $700.

This time Mr Shkreli has bought a majority share in KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, allowing him to apply for exclusive selling rights to KaloBios’ benznidazole, a common drug used to treat Chigas in South America, where it is very prevelant.

It is reported by the New York Times that benznidazole currently costs between $50 to $100 for two months worth of treatment.

However the New York Times believe that the cost could soon be similar to that of a hepatitis C drug, which costs anywhere between $60,000 and $100,000 per course of treatment.

It is estimated 300,000 in the United States have Chagas disease

So here – and certainly in the demonization of Democrats be they Obama or Hillary Clinton – have the epitomy of everything that is wrong with corporate America.

The news has trickled out (the propaganda media doing everything possible to keep a lid on yet another giant Democrat scandal).  But back in September this:

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Commitee took $33,400 from Big Pharma’s big jerk Martin Shkreli

You may have read about Turing Pharmaceuticals owner Martin Shkreli being a total jerk on social media in response to his company raising the price of Daraprim, a drug used to treat toxoplasmosis, a medical condition that can be fatal to people with AIDS and developing fetuses, from $13.50/pill to a whopping $750/pill. If not, you can read about it here.

However, when I was looking on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) website about political donations that Martin Shkreli made, I managed to find one political donation that I am 100% certain is of Turing Pharmaceuticals’s Martin Shkreli, and that is a $33,400 donation that Shkreli made to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) on July 18th of this year

The leftist organization Move On made it official:

Martin Shkreli, the hedge fund manager and Turing Pharmaceuticals owner who claimed that raising the price of Daraprim, a medication used to treat toxoplasmosis, a medical condition that can be fatal for people with AIDS, from $13.50/pill to a whopping $750/pill would be a “great thing for society”, donated $33,400 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC).

In light of Shkreli’s overt greed and attacks against those who oppose price-gouging in the prescription drug industry, we, the signatories of this petition, call for the DSCC to donate $33,400 to charity.

And another leftwing operation also reported the following:

“Most Hated Man in America” Martin Shkreli Was Just Arrested for Alleged Securities Fraud
—By Inae Oh | Thu Dec. 17, 2015 8:46 AM EST
Martin Shkreli, the 32-year-old pharmaceuticals executive who landed in the news in September for price-gouging a life-saving drug by a staggering 5,000 percent, was arrested on Thursday for alleged securities fraud.

Bloomberg reports federal agents arrested the Turing CEO at his Manhattan home. He is now being accused of taking money from a previous drug company he founded in 2011, Retrophin Inc., to cover unrelated debts.

The arrest comes just months after reports first surfaced accusing Shkreli of hiking the price of Daraprim, a parasite-killing drug used to treat patients with HIV or cancer, from $13.50 to $750 per pill. Outrage over the price hike prompted multiple headlines declaring him the “most hated man in America.”

Shkreli soon promised to drop the drug’s price to a “point that is more affordable” and that would allow the company to make a “very small profit.” It became quickly apparent, however, that he never intended to follow through on that promise…

So let’s just PLEASE dispense with the cockroach liberal rhetoric that the massive escalation of healthcare costs is somehow due to “Republican greed.”

You desperately need to understand that ultimately “Democrats” – which I rightly claim stands for “DEMOn-possessed bureauCRATS” – are FASCISTS.  And when you consider the fascist economic model, you will see why I say that.  Wikipedia points out that:

An inherent aspect of fascist economies was economic dirigisme,^[4] meaning an economy where the government exerts strong directive influence over investment, as opposed to having a merely regulatory role. In general, apart from the nationalizations of some industries, fascist economies were based on private individuals being allowed property and private initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state.^[5]

The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics provides this:

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.

Liberal intellectuals dishonestly try to claim that “fascism” and “Nazism” were somehow “right wing” or “conservative” and they are just flat-out LIARS.  And in point of fact these academics are actually merely Marxist plants who are doing nothing more than mouthing the official party line of hard-core STALINISTS:

“The influence of Marxist scholarship has severely distorted our understanding of fascism.  Communism and fascism were rival brands of socialism.  Whereas Marxist socialism is predicated on an international class struggle, fascist national socialism promoted a socialism centered in national unity.  [And in fact, Both movements were “revolutionary socialist ideologies.”  Going on,] Both communists and fascists opposed the bourgeoisie.  Both attacked the conservatives.  Both were mass movements, which had special appeal for the intelligentsia, students, and artists, as well as workers.  Both favored strong centralized governments and rejected the free economy and the ideals of individual liberty.  [And finally,] Fascists saw themselves as being neither of the right nor the left.  They believed that they constituted a third force synthesizing the best of both extremes” [Gene Edward Veith, Jr., Modern Fascism: Liquidating the Judeo-Christian Worldview, p. 26].

In other words, to be a “fascist” is to be a “socialist” and to be a “socialist” is to be a damn LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT.  If you are a “Democrat,” you are by definition someone who wants to use government power to impose winners and losers rather than allowing any free market laissez-faire system to do that; you are in favor of “requiring” businesses to jump through your hoops in order to implicitly attain control over the means of production; you want a planned society with the façade appearance of a free market.  In other words, if you are a Democrat, you are a fascist and you are just either too dishonest or too damn stupid to admit it.

I’m not merely pointing out the fact that the worst corporate turd who stands for everything the Democrat Party claims to hate is a hard-core Democrat; I’m pointing out that everything about the entire Democrat-fascist philosophy is oriented toward giving birth to turds like Shkreli.

But most people are never really going to know this because they have become apathetic sheep and because the mainstream media as the propaganda machine of the Democrat Party does not want you to know this.

I am watching a demonic-delusion being passed over the American people.  Terrorism UNDER OBAMA skyrocketed 150% the first five years of his administration between 2009 and 2013.  That skyrocketing rate turned into a rocket-ship rate as terrorism under Obama soared 81% last year over 2013.  UNDER OBAMA, murders from terrorism quadrupled to this point.  And whether you’re talking about terrorist attacks or the deaths from those attacks, I guarantee you that you haven’t seen ANYTHING yet as both EXPLODED this year over last.

UNDER Obama, the international refugee crisis has absolutely EXPLODED.  We have literally never seen more refugees at any time in the entire documented history of the human race.

But what do Democrats do?  They blame Bush, they say it’s all Republicans’ fault; and militantLY and wickedly refuse to consider the calamitous results of THEIR policies as Obama pursued a policy that Republicans have stated for YEARS would lead to catastrophe and which have clearly led to catastrophe just as they rightly predicted.

And they’re trying to do the same damn thing with the economy, with jobs, with wages, with income inequality, that they’ve wickedly done with foreign policy.

Literally, THE MORE THEY FAIL, THE MORE THEY THINK THEY SHOULD BE GIVEN EVEN MORE TOTAL GOVERNMENT POWER TO FAIL STILL MORE.

Obama Let In 9,500 ‘Immigrants’ With Terrorist Ties, Revoked Their Visas After The Fact, And Now Has NO IDEA AT ALL Where They Are

Is this part of a plan?

Obama has “lost track” of 9,500 “immigrants” whose visas were revoked because they were identified as having ties to terrorism.

In what might be the WORST thing about this new revelation is that Tashfeen Malik – the murderous Islamic terrorist who came here on a visa and gunned down 35 people (murdering 14) – was not even ON that list of 9.500 potential terrorists.

We have under Obama and because of Obama completely lost any handle, any track, any sense of the exploding problem of Islamic terrorism (that Obama won’t even acknowledge is a problem).

Take a look at this and mourn for your country that has had I.E.D.s implanted into its bowels because of one wicked man and one wicked political party:

Terrific: Feds Have No Clue If 9500 People With Revoked Visas and Links to Terrorism Are in U.S.
Katie Pavlich | Dec 18, 2015

In case you missed it yesterday, the House Oversight Committee held a hearing about the vetting process for refugees entering the United States from terrorism hot spots.

During the hearing, officials from the State Department and Homeland Security were asked about the location of 9,500 individuals who have been stripped of their U.S. visas because of links to terrorism. They had no idea and could not say if these individuals were still in the U.S.

“The Department [State] has revoked approximately 122,000 visas for a variety of reasons including nearly 9500 with links to terrorism. Of the 122,000 revoked visas, how many of those people are still in the United States?” Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz asked Department of State Assistant Secretary Michele Bond. 

“I don’t know,” she responded.

“Homeland Security, how many revoked visas are still in the United States of America,” Chaffetz asked DHS Assistant Secretary for International Affairs Alan Bersin. 

“Mr. Chairman, I don’t have that,” he responded. 

According to a 2014 report from ABC News, the federal government has lost track of 6,000 foreign nationals who have overstayed their student visas. Keep in mind that this is the tactic the 9/11 hijackers used.

The Department of Homeland Security has lost track of more than 6,000 foreign nationals who entered the United States on student visas, overstayed their welcome, and essentially vanished — exploiting a security gap that was supposed to be fixed after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.

“My greatest concern is that they could be doing anything,” said Peter Edge, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement official who oversees investigations into visa violators. “Some of them could be here to do us harm.”

ABC News found that immigration officials have struggled to keep track of the rapidly increasing numbers of foreign students coming to the U.S. — now in excess of one million each year. The immigration agency’s own figures show that 58,000 students overstayed their visas in the past year. Of those, 6,000 were referred to agents for follow-up because they were determined to be of heightened concern.

In the meantime, the White House is moving forward with plans to bring in an absolute MINIMUM of 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States within the next two years.

We currently – and I mean RIGHT STINKING NOW – have more refugees fleeing a world that is collapsing than at any time in the documented history of the world:

Worldwide displacement hits all-time high as war and persecution increase
News Stories, 18 June 2015

GENEVA, June 18 (UNHCR) – Wars, conflict and persecution have forced more people than at any other time since records began to flee their homes and seek refuge and safety elsewhere, according to a new report from the UN refugee agency.

UNHCR’s annual Global Trends Report: World at War, released on Thursday (June 18), said that worldwide displacement was at the highest level ever recorded. […]

There wouldn’t have BEEN a refugee crisis unless Obama had created it.

And in the same way, terrorism and terrorist groups and terrorist attacks have EXPLODED under Obama BECAUSE of Obama.  [But please don’t tell liberals that terrorist murders quadrupled under Obama or else they’ll give him ANOTHER Nobel Peace Prize; these people are just that steeped in evil and deceit].

And therefore the massive way of Muslim “immigration” into America that Obama has not only facilitated but demanded has overwhelmed any means for anyone trying to protect America.  And I mean, SHOULDN’T OBAMA KNOW THIS?  SHOULDN’T HE CARE?  BUT HE DOESN’T CARE.  Because Obama has an ideology and a partisan agenda, and nothing else matters to him.

And currently – and I mean RIGHT STINKING NOW – Obama is incredibly saying that his plan is working wonderfully.  This is a man who is completely owned by Satan.

You cannot explain the mystery of lawlessness that is Obama without understanding that there is a personal Satan who owns Obama’s soul, owns the Democrat Party that is Obama’s machine, and therefore owns America.  Which USED to be “one nation under God” until the Democrat Party stripped God from the nation.

But let me get back to the 9,500 very-possible TERRORISTS who may very well be in our country RIGHT NOW because Obama just didn’t bother to look for them.

Do you understand that?  Nearly 10,000 terrorists are God-knows-where and quite likely working on their plots to murder in the name of Allah – and Obama’s response is to demand we let in ANOTHER 10,000 potential terrorists from a hostile and collapsed state where a) we can’t possibly vet anyone anyway even in the best of times and b) Islamic State has seized their own passport machine AND the blank official passport forms to manufacture “authentic Syrian passports.”

Add to that number the 6,000 that Obama allowed in who used the exact same trick as the 9/11 terrorists who brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Center and murdered 3,000 people.

Add to THAT number ANOTHER 122,000 CRIMINALS who are guilty of crimes as bad as rape and murder whom Obama just completely lost track of.

As to this immediate above, it’s not like conservatives weren’t frothing in rage about it FIVE DAMN YEARS AGO (as I documented):

New Obama ICE Plan Refuses To Deport Illegals Without ‘Serious’ Criminal Record

And therefore Obama’s INTENTIONAL RELEASE of 68,000 illegal immigrant CRIMINALS INCLUDING MURDERERS AND RAPISTS was a matter of inevitability (as I documented):

Obama Released 68,000 Convicted Criminal Illegal Immigrants Last Year (To Attack/Udermine Americans AGAIN)

Barack Obama is a man who truly, passionately hates and despises America.  He doesn’t give one flying DAMN about you or your family.  In fact, he HOPES you suffer because he believes he can radicalize you to his ends; he HOPES you are murdered by terrorists because he can exploit your murder and incite the fools he radicalizes to further his ends.  You are nothing more than an insignificant means to his pathologically demonic ends.

He has already revealed his cynical plan to use every new terrorist attack as his political mechanism to attack the American people and attack their Constitution and obliterate their 2nd Amendment rights.

There is no possible way NOT to include that Obama and Democrats aren’t doing this on purpose.  Incompetence doesn’t even BEGIN to explain this.

Does Obama even BEGIN to care about the American people?  Did he EVER care?  The answer is not a care in hell.

Obama just responded to the San Bernardino terrorist massacre by freeing a bunch of terrorists from Gitmo.  He just did it again, freeing more terrorists than at any time in his entire cancerous presidency.  But get this as described by former Attorney General Judge Michael Mukasey:

And from day – wasn’t day one, it was actually day two when he started signing orders closing Gitmo, eliminating the CIA interrogation program that it was obvious he was going to do this. And he proceeded along that road. If you take a look, there is an interesting YouTube video him signing executive orders on the second day of his administration. Where he signs an executive order to close Gitmo, takes a look at it, he says do we have another order that says what were going to do with these people? And so voice off camera says we’re going to have procedures.

No, they didn’t have any plan for what to do with the terrorists they were freeing.  But so what?  They didn’t CARE.  Obama let them go anyway.  They STILL don’t have a damn plan and they STILL don’t care.  It is a damn miserable fact that one in three of the “Gitmo detainees” have been DOCUMENTED to have returned to terrorism (keep in mind what I’ve shown the U.S. government CAN’T keep track of, right?).  And they don’t care.

Obama is in the genre and model and mode of Adolf Hitler who first exploited the Reichstag fire to suspend the rights of German citizens and then exploited the Gleiwitz incident to take his next step into dictatorship.  Obama has a proven “never let a good crisis go to waste” mentality: I submit that, given the above facts that Obama has clearly perpetrated on the American people, it is beyond entirely reasonable to believe that Obama plans to cynically exploit the terror attacks he has invited on America as his “justification” to suspend the 2016 election if it looks like a Republican could win in addition to seizing our guns that we would need to defend ourselves against his fascist tyranny.

Obama has literally INTENTIONALLY flooded America with terrorists so he can blame their terrorism – whose actual source of Islam he demonically refuses to acknowledge – on guns.  It doesn’t matter to him that the attack in San Bernardino took place in a liberal state with the tightest gun laws in the country; it doesn’t matter that the immediate prior mass terror attack in France took place in a COUNTRY with some of the tightest gun laws in the WORLD.  Just as it doesn’t matter to him that he is a truly wicked man for allowing all of these murderers into America to attack us.

He’s giving us another useless blathering speech today and then he’s off to Hawaii for another vacation.

Like I said, Tashfeen Malik, the terrorist monster, was NOT one of these 9,500 potential terrorists.  Because Obama completely missed her in every imaginable way.  She was entirely free to commit jihad murder.  Obama not only didn’t do anything to stop her; he invited her in even after it should have been obvious that she was plotting jihadist mayhem.

The beast is coming.  And very soon every single mass-murdering baby-slaughtering homosexual-sodomy-perversion worshiping Democrat will worship him and take his mark on their right hands or on their foreheads.

 

Islam’s ONLY Hope For True Reform Comes From A Surprising Source. And What Of America’s Only Hope For Reform?

I’ve recently been contemplating the Qur’an and the pathological tendency toward violence within Islam.  And I’ve been contemplating how morally idiotic liberals irrationally and continually pronounce Islam as “a peaceful religion” when they would NEVER say the same thing about biblical Christianity given the Bible’s blatantly clear stances of abortion, homosexuality and socialism.

Is Islam a religion of peace?  Is Mars a planet with breathable atmosphere?  No and no, with both deserving a “No, stupid” delivered with suitable incredulous and condescending stare.

I’ve made the points recently: both the Bible and the Qur’an contain commands to violence and death.  Here’s an article from a decidedly liberal (i.e., hostile to Judeo-Christianity) perspective about the Bible being even MORE violent than the Qur’an in the eyes of progressive liberalism.  Penn State religious history professor Philip Jenkins launched his own “investigation” of the Bible vis a vis the Qur’an and concluded, “”Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible.”

And of course everyone is agonizingly aware of the ten top Christian terrorist organizations inflicting mass death in tens of thousands of terror attacks.  Oh, wait, they’re not, BECAUSE THERE AREN’T ANY CHRISTIAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS the way we’ve suffered al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Taliban,  al-Shabaab, Hezbollah, Hamas, Ansar al-Sharia, al-Nusra, Muslim Brotherhood, etc., etc.

It’s just a complete mystery to liberals why a “religion of peace” like Islam is inspiring so much terror and hate and violence.  When they believe with ever fiber of their being that it ought to be the Christianity that they so despise that is the true source of all the violence.

Let’s consider this leftist professor’s claims and see if they are actually true.  I’ll begin with the Bible and proceed to expose a critical fact that Jenkins leaves entirely out of his false comparison.

Yes, the God of the Bible, in judgment of sin, commands the Israelites to wipe out and exterminate the inhabitants of the land He is giving His people.  God gives Abraham’s descendants through Isaac the Promised Land.  Shortly before Abraham dies, God tells Abraham this:

 “As for you, you shall go to your fathers in peace; you will be buried at a good old age.  Then in the fourth generation they will return here, for the iniquity of the Amorite is not yet complete.” — Genesis 15:15-16.

Understand that God had already promised Abraham this land that belonged to another people in Genesis 12.  In the very passage I just quoted for you from Genesis 15, God immediately after verses 15-16 proceeds to specifically define the boundaries of the Promised Land that He just promised:

On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates–the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites.” — Genesis 15:18-21

So God tells Abraham, “I am giving you THIS land, land that other peoples are currently on.  But not YET.  God’s promise unfolds throughout Genesis chapter 15. Look at the unfolding context:

• 7He also said to him, “I am the LORD, who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to take possession of it.”
• 13Then the LORD said to him, “Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated there.
• 14But I will punish the nation they serve as slaves, and afterward they will come out with great possessions.
• 15You, however, will go to your ancestors in peace and be buried at a good old age.
• 16In the fourth generation your descendants will come back here, for the sin of the Amorites has not yet reached its full measure.”
• 18On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates–
• 19the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites,
• 20Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites,
• 21Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites.”

The Book of Genesis records Israel being invited into Egypt by a grateful Pharaoh but ultimately being cruelly enslaved by a subsequent Pharaoh.  And just as God had foretold to Abraham, Israel would spend 400 years in bondage as slaves.  But the Israelites were finally delivered through Moses.  And they came in and took the land that God had promised them.  And God gave them this land after having given the wicked people who inhabited it 400 years to get their moral acts together.

God tells the Israelites under the command of Moses’ successor Joshua to wipe out these peoples (i.e., the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites).  In Deuteronomy 20:16-18 God commands:

16“Only in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall not leave alive anything that breathes. 17“But you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittite and the Amorite, the Canaanite and the Perizzite, the Hivite and the Jebusite, as the LORD your God has commanded you, 18 so that they may not teach you to do according to all their detestable things which they have done for their gods, so that you would sin against the LORD your God.…

This theme – and the reason behind it – is repeated several times by God in the Old Testament, as Numbers 33:55 demonstrates:

“‘But if you do not drive out the inhabitants of the land, those you allow to remain will become barbs in your eyes and thorns in your sides. They will give you trouble in the land where you will live.

So in these passages we have the commandment and we also have the REASON FOR the commandment: if Israel destroys its enemies and wipes them out, they will not be corrupted.  If they refuse or fail to wipe out their enemies, then the very same evil that brought God’s judgment on their enemies will enter into Israel and God will have to bring judgment upon THEM.

Which, for the record, is ultimately precisely what happened to Israel as is declared in numerous biblical passages.  We find in 1 Samuel 15:17-24 a simple statement that Israel refused to obey God’s commands.  They didn’t drive out these wicked peoples, who ultimately morally contaminated them and perverted the righteous culture God commanded them to create where previously only the wicked cultures of the Amorite, Jebusite, etc. had been.

Because Israel did NOT drive out the wicked peoples who inhabited the land God gave them according to God’s command, Israel became just as wicked if not MORE wicked than those people as their evil ways contaminated Israel’s culture:

But the people did not listen. Manasseh led them astray, so that they did more evil than the nations the LORD had destroyed before the Israelites. — 2 Kings 21:9

Habakkuk chapter one records the people becoming evil and the LORD raising up the Babylonians to judge them.

And so just as God used the Israelites as His weapon against the wicked peoples who inhabited the land that God gave to Israel, so God used the mighty Gentile nations such as the Egyptians, the Assyrians and the Babylonians against Israel.  God is sovereign over the nations, and He providentially uses them to ultimately accomplish His will.  And in His sovereign providence He uses the righteous and the wicked alike.

Israel was first subjugated by Gentile powers and ultimately after rejecting their Messiah ceased to exist for two millennia until God, in fulfillment of His word through Ezekiel, literally resurrected the nation back from the “dry bones” of the dead.  And in miraculous fulfillment of Isaiah 66:8 – “Who has ever heard of such things? Who has ever seen things like this? Can a country be born in a day or a nation be brought forth in a moment? Yet no sooner is Zion in labor than she gives birth to her children” – Israel was born in a day when the United Nations officially and historically declared her existence on May 14, 1948.  This was in direct response out of international outrage over the world having allowed six million Jews to be slaughtered in the Holocaust.

Liberals may not like it because they hate the God of the Bible, His righteousness, and His sovereignty over the nations when they yearn for a totalitarian socialist global new world order that exalts itself far above the God of the Bible.

God is sovereign over the nations.  Liberals despise Him for that; they want a world where the nation – the totalitarian human government – is sovereign over God.  They want a world where they dictate to God and to mankind what is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is evil.  But I digress.

We have seen up to this point that in a violent world, God not only condoned but actually commanded His people Israel to employ the same violence that all the other people were employing.

BUT… we ultimately come to a critical turning point in the Bible: we come to the promise of a New Covenant.  The Old Testament itself affirms a coming New Covenant:

³¹ “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, ³² not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. ³³ For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. ³⁴ And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.” — Jeremiah 31:31-34

Hebrews 8:6-13 also affirms that this New Covenant has been fulfilled in Christ Jesus.

During the Last Supper Jesus said:

19And when He had taken some bread and given thanks, He broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” 20And in the same way He took the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in My blood.”  — Luke 22:19-21

Hebrews 9:15 states, “For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance–now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.”

So we have a progression in both Testaments of the Bible from the Old Covenant to a New Covenant.  And the New Covenant is literally and even physically embodied in the Word, Messiah Jesus.

And what is it that Jesus taught?  What did He command?  Violence?  No, the Virgin-born fulfillment of Isaiah 9:6 came to be “the Prince of peace.”  And Jesus taught even as He was being led away to be viciously flogged and then crucified, “Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.”

Liberals completely fail to comprehend this: the Bible begins with violence and moves to peace.

Not so the Qur’an.  Not so Muhammad.  When you read a Qur’an, understand that “Muhammad was like two different persons at two different times and the Quran is like two contradictory books pasted together.”  Understand that in Islam you have 1390 Years of Violence and only 10 years of Peace.

When Mohammad first began to proselytize his new religion in Mecca and claim that he was receiving revelations from Allah, he was decidedly the underdog.  And correspondingly all of his revelations centered around peaceful coexistence and tolerance.

But then Mohammad went to Medina in what is today called “Al Hijra.”  He was able to garner followers and became militarily powerful.  And suddenly all of the revelations of his Qur’an took a decidedly violent turn.

The Qur’an was NOT organized in any kind of chronological order; rather, it was organized by length, from the longest to the shortest suras.

When you re-arrange the Qur’an by chronology, you get this order: and you get not violence to peace as the Holy Bible gives, but peace to VIOLENCE.

So, for example, do your own research.  Consider the very first violent Sura 2:191-193 found in the Qur’an which states, “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”.  And lo and behold, when you examine the chronological order and look to the right column to see where it was organized according to the tradition based on length of sura, you find that this edict found in Sura 2 to “kill them wherever you may find them” is the VERY FIRST sura Mohammad conveniently claimed he received from Allah when he arrived in Medina and became the dominant power. 

This is not merely a command for violence; it is a UNIVERSAL COMMAND for violence.  I’ll talk about that more.

Keep going down the list of violent suras and look at where they are found, whether they were written earlier in Mohammad’s Mecca phase or later when he arrived at Medina and became militarily powerful.

You will find that without any question, the vast overwhelming majority of violent sura that commanded violence and death were given in Medina just as the vast overwhelming majority of suras commanding any kind of “peace” was given in Mecca.

A simple historic statement of fact: Mohammad and the Qur’an takes us from peace to viciousness and hate and murder and death and slaughter.

Now, this is bad, but it actually gets WORSE.  Because Islam has a doctrine called “abrogation” by which later suras correct and supercede earlier ones.

In other words, if Mohammad first said “peace” and then he said “war,” the ONLY correct interpretation of the Qur’an MUST BE WAR.

Now, abrogation is not necessarily such a terrible thing; every parent has done it: your child may ask you if she can go to a party, and then you find out something you don’t like about the party that makes you change or mind, or your child misbehaves and you say, “Now you can’t go.”  You’ve abrogated your previous statement.  You’ve said yes and now you’re saying no to the same thing you’d said yes to.  So if your child comes to you and says, “You said on Monday I could go, so I went,” you are enraged as you point out, “But I said on TUESDAY you could NOT go, so you are in a heap of trouble!”

It’s different when it comes to a revelation from God, though: God isn’t supposed to be caught by surprise or change His mind with new information or be wrong and then correct Himself.  How did Mohammad respond to this dilemma?  It seems that Qur’an 2:106 was “revealed” in response to skepticism directed at Muhammad that Allah’s revelations were not entirely consistent over time. Muhammad’s rebuttal was that ”Allah is able to do all things” — even change his mind.

And hence we have examples of blatantly obvious abrogation in the Qur’an such as:

In Surah 58, Al Mujadilah, verse 12, the believers are commanded to give alms before a private consultation with the Messenger. In verse 13 they are told that it is no longer necessary.

In Surah 33, Al Ahzab, verses 50-51 Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) is allowed to marry and divorce an unlimited number of women. In verse 52 he is prohibited to continue to do so.

In Surah 73, Al Muzzammil, verses 2-4, the prophet of Islam is commanded to spend about half of the night in prayer and reading of the Quran. In verse 20 of the same Surah this is changed into what is easy for him and those who followed his example.

But this Islamic view of Allah is in very direct contrast to the Judeo-Christian God of the Bible, and so we have passages like Numbers 23:19: “God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?”

Sneering liberal pseudo-intellectuals claim that Christianity has the same issue of abrogation, BUT WE DON’T.  And they are frankly moral idiots of the very lowest order to make such a blatantly false claim.  Here’s why:

1. In every single example of violence in the Old Testament, it is ALWAYS in EVERY CASE a specific command by God to a specific people to do a specific thing at a specific time for a specific reason.  There is NO universalized commandment by God to always kill everyone the way we see in the Qur’an, no “kill them wherever you find them.”  There are no verses in the Bible that say “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you…” (Qur’an 2:216), no “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah” (Qur’an 4:76).  God never gives a universal command that He later has to take back.
2. If the Bible were given the same way the Qur’an is given, Moses would have commanded peace and Jesus would have come after Moses and subsequently taught, “But I tell you, hate your enemies and slaughter those who persecute you.”  When Jesus, in fulfillment of the New Covenant that even the Old Covenant itself anticipated hundreds of years before Jesus’ arrival on earth, as the Prince of Peace, actually taught, “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44).  You need to comprehend how absolutely MASSIVE is the difference between a religion that begins with violence and then moves to peace (Christianity) verses a religion that begins with peace and then ends with commands to universalized violence.
3. The Bible pointedly “abrogates” ITSELF in terms of violence because it promises a New Covenant and then it DELIVERS one in the form of the Prince of Peace, Jesus.  The “abrogation” of violence was not for the sake of Jesus’ convenience, the way the abrogation of peace for a call to violence clearly was politically oh-so-very convenient for Mohammad.  Let me put it this way: Jesus told Peter, “Put away your sword” (Matthew 26:52) in order that He could be arrested and beaten and go to the cross where He would die a terrible, humiliating, agonizing death in our place for our sins.  Versus Mohammad who said let’s be peaceful when he was the underdog and then turned on a dime and ordered mass violence the moment his forces gained the upper hand.
4. The Bible doesn’t “abrogate” violence merely because times had changed and the world was no longer a violent place and the Bible was correcting a problem that was obviously out of step with the rest of the world.  Any such notion is simply FALSE.  The Romans at the time of Christ were as vicious and brutal as ANYONE ever had been; what they did to Jesus itself proves that.  And Jesus’ disciples wrote the New Testament not only in light of what Rome had done to Jesus, but in light of the fact that even as they were writing, Rome was treating Christians viciously.  St. Peter and St. Paul were both executed by Rome, as were many other disciples.
5. The God of the Bible is a God of wrath just as He is a God of love.  But all of His attributes are perfectly balanced, such that His wrath is manifested in the attribute of justice that ultimately flows from love.  And the toleration of evil results in a lack of justice.  And so God gave His people the sword and used them as an instrument in defined, limited circumstances and only in accordance with His command.  But ultimately He was always preparing for the arrival of His Son, the Prince of Peace.
6. Finally, the thing that changed in the Bible was this: “But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship” (Galatians 4:4-5).  God prophesied a coming Messiah who would epitomize and usher in a “new covenant,” and Jesus came as foretold.
7. And so Jesus completely fulfilled the Old Covenant (Matthew 5:17).  The various laws and regulations and customs of the Old Testament weren’t “abrogated,” but rather they were fulfilled and served their purpose and were no longer necessary because the promised Messiah took their burden off our necks.  And so Christians have realized even in the time of St. Peter that unless a principle or a command from the Old Covenant is specifically repeated/restated in the New Covenant, it was fulfilled by Christ and no longer applies to New Covenant believers.  We can compare the Old Covenant and the New to the abacus vs. the computer or the horse vs. the automobile: the former things weren’t “abrogated” and declared wrong; rather they served their purpose and we now use the superior things.  Christ is the Superior which fulfilled the inferior and the inferior that served as a type or a shadow (see for example Colossians 2:17, Hebrews 8:5) of the Superior is therefore no longer needed.

It is for this reason that I point out the fact and hereby state for the historical record that Penn State religious history professor Philip Jenkins is an abject moral idiot and the worst kind of intellectual fraud.  He is, as are all progressive liberals, a pathologically ignorant fool masquerading himself as someone who is wise and knowledgeable when he in fact teaches the precise opposite of wisdom and knowledge.  Jenkins is not only utterly blind to what is actually going on all around him in the real world as Muslim terrorists murder and bomb innocent people in the name of Allah, but as I have just proven he is just as utterly blind to the religious theology that he claims that he is an expert in.

A passage from Colossians sums these liberal fools up well: “Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.” – Colossians 2:8.  Tragically, modern universities teach very little BUT “empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense.”

The fact that the Qur’an does NOT begin with violence and then end with peace, but rather the opposite, and the fact that abrogation forces true Muslims to accept that the later “revelations” to Mohammad supercede previous ones, puts Islam in a deep, dark pit of endless violence that is NOT true of Christianity.

Which is why Christianity and Christ are attacked all the damn TIME by liberals and Christians don’t unleash waves of violent hate the way Muslims routinely do the moment they even THINK their Prophet might be getting insulted.

We are left with a giant problem of Islam: we find that Islam, Mohammad and the Qur’an spent ten years deceiving people by preaching peace and tolerance in order to grow strong and powerful, and then the rest of history practicing force and violence and terror the moment they were able to gain the upper hand.

We find that Islam does NOT mean “peace” as liberals love to adoringly say; it means “submission.”  AND YOU WILL SUBMIT OR ELSE YOU WILL BE KILLED.

A historical study of Mohammad’s life reveals that the “Prophet of Peace” had fought in over thirty violent military campaigns and had at least another thirty campaigns planned at the time of his death in 632 AD.  In fact I can quote you Islamic sources that state, “that the Prophet waged jihad operations 77 times in the first 10 years as head of the Muslim community in Medina.”  But it is a fact of history that when Mohammad showed up at Medina, he became a violent terrorist warmonger who waged unrelenting war until he defeated and subjugated everyone around him.  What you will also find is that Islam did NOT practice peace after Mohammad’s death; in fact it split due to terrifying, graphic and vicious violence that continues to this very day as the viciousness created Sunni and Shiite Islam.  But within 100 years of Mohammad’s death, warring, violent Muslims were attacking Christian Europe and had killed an looted and pillaged their way all across the entirety of Europe before finally being crushed by Charles “the Hammer” Martel at the Battle of Tours in France in 732.  Violent warring Muslims had already poured across Africa and seized the Christian realms established by St. Augustine.  All of the vast peaceful Christian provinces of North Africa had fallen to the bloody sword of Allah by 711.  Violent, warring Muslims poured into Christian Spain to be finally defeated by El Cid.  Violent, warring Muslims poured into the Christian Byzantine Empire and besieged Constantinople and the Christian Emperor pleaded with the Pope to send Christian warriors to defend a Christian realm from Muslim conquest in what became known as the Crusades.

The United States of America, from its infancy, almost immediately came into contact with violent, warring Islam as the violent, warring Muslims from the Islamic Barbary States began a vicious campaign against the United States.  So we had ten years of “peace” and yes, fourteen centuries of violence and war.

The ONLY thing in history that has stopped Islam from violence against their “infidel” neighbors is raw military power and the Muslims’ naked fear of the “infidels'” willingness to use it.

The Muslims who are attacking us are doing nothing more than reading their Qur’ans in light of the life of their moral and spiritual paradigm, their Prophet, Mohammad.  Their lives are matching his teachings, and that is why they are “killing us wherever they may find us.”

Jesus, by contrast, never harmed anyone.  He was the Lamb of God who never harmed anyone or ever commanded anyone to ever harm anyone.  Jesus is the antithesis of Mohammad.

If you want peace, there is ultimately one one place and one Person to go to: to the foot of the Cross, to the feet of Jesus, who came to allow violence to prevail so He could ultimately prevail against all violence when He returns as King of kings and Lord of lords.

So, how then do you reform Islam?  If you have any honesty or intelligence, you ought to see the nearly insurmountable difficulty by now.

There is only one possible way and it is interesting where it is found:

It is found in the Qur’an itself.

What you have to do is go to one interesting and frankly incredibly embarrassing period for Muslims: when Mohammad received his “Satanic Verses.”

Here are a couple of links to understand what is going on from Answering Islam (another here) and from Muhammadanism.  But here’s what happened in a historic nutshell: while Mohammad was in Medina (his “peaceful” period), he was weak and had few followers.  He was estranged from even his own tribe.  And he had a “revelation” that it was okay for his followers to acknowledge and affirm the existence of three pagan goddesses alongside Allah: Lat, Uzza, and Manat.  When the inhabitants of Mecca heard Muhammad’s confession of the ancient goddesses inside the Ka’aba, they immediately revoked the ban they had placed on him and gave his movement political breathing room.  But the moment he was able to become strong enough to rescind his confession, he took it back by claiming that while he had believed it had come from Allah, it had actually come from Satan.  And so he went back on his confession because what he had put in the Qur’an as a revelation from Allah had actually come from Satan.  Hence the title, “the Satanic verses.”

I’m just going to say it: the ONLY hope for Islam in terms of any meaningful reform into a religion of actual peace is for Islam to affirm that the ENTIRE Medina portion of the Qur’an came from Satan.

It is a simple and undisputable fact of history that Mohammad HIMSELF took back part of his Qur’an and claimed it had actually been from Satan; ultimately, Muslims are going to have to take back a much bigger chunk of it and recognize that every violent sura came from the same Satan.

Mohammad himself acknowledged that Satan could enter into him and alter his revelation.  Run with it.

But what of the United States?  What is our only hope for reform?

Another fact of history to point out is that the United States actually has some powerful experience with dealing with fanatic death cults.  We faced one called “Imperial Japan.”  Believe it or not, Muslims were NOT the first people to fly planes loaded with bombs into human-inhabited structures: think “Kamikaze pilots” during World War II: not merely hundreds but THOUSANDS of them.  3,860 Japanese Kamikaze pilots died as their explosives-laden planes either crashed into American ships or were shot down trying to do so.

Oh, yes, America has dealt with “suicide bombers” and the ideology that sent them at us before.  Do you understand me?  WE’VE DEALT WITH THIS KIND OF VICIOUS MENTALITY BEFORE.  And we did not prevail over it by adopting any modern liberal pile of inane Obama blathering drivel.

How we defeated that existential threat to freedom and peace is a matter of history.

The Japanese Imperial fascists were every BIT as much of a national death cult as what we are confronting now with Islam: but the United States of America stopped being “a sleeping giant” and woke up enough to unleash a violent jihad of our OWN and we BROKE THE NECK of that national death cult.

I remember the quote from the Japanese admiral who had planned the Pearl Harbor attack and then realized what he had done as America began to rise up in righteous anger:

“I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve.” Japanese Admiral Yamamoto

Islam is NOT going to reform by itself.  Any more than the Japanese were going to reform by themselves.  They’re going to need some confrontation.  They are going to need to be confronted with reason and with truth and with fact and with their own history and they are going to need to be confronted with a terrible resolve to use all the power we can bring against them until they are forced to see reason as the Japanese were forced to see reason.

But that means that the United States needs to reform as well if it is going to survive.  We desperately need to manifest the same “terrible resolve” that we were able to find in the days of our greatness.

Pain can be an awesome tutor when it is combined with truth.  That is the only chance to drive even a fool to finally see reason and do the right thing.

Liberals are people with a pathological hatred of truth.  And so what they keep repeating in their condescending moral idiocy is that everyone ought to be just like them and ignore truth, ignore reason, ignore history, ignore reality and just follow the blatherings of Obama.

The TRUTH is that Islam has an inherent, intrinsic, pathological problem with violence.  Ultimately, the ONLY way through to any genuine peace is to make Islam recognize that truth and DEAL with it.  Any liberal notion that the path to peace is to ignore the truth, bury our head in the sand and hope the truth somehow goes away is another word for “suicide.”

Liberals tell us over and over again that to confront Islam, to associate it with terrorism, will “radicalize” the Islamic world.  But here’s the thing: every single time liberals affirm this proposition, what they are in fact acknowledging is their own belief that every single Muslim is hair-trigger psycho and all it will take is the slightest provocation, the littlest nudge, to send them over the edge of madness and into bloodbath jihad.  They acknowledge that the very Christianity they revile so is a FAR superior worldview to every other worldview including Islam, because it is only in Christianity that we can have peace even with our enemies as we follow the teachings of Jesus as true disciples.  Let’s get beyond “Piss Christ” (a crucifix of Christ placed in a jar of urine) and Ofili’s “Holy Virgin Mary” (a mockery of the Virgin Mary smearing her with dung and pornographic images); just imagine the response if a Barack Obama tried to impose homosexual marriage on a Muslim country and imagine every single Muslim willing to crawl over the dead bodies of their own family members so they could get to Obama and cut his head off for his blasphemy.  Or how about this one: why don’t you Democrats try forcing the American people to fund “Piss Prophet” with tax dollars the same way you imposed “Piss Christ” on us and see how crazy insane Muslims get?

You don’t DARE do that.  Why not? 

And the answer is: because the mere act of drawing a cartoon – and let me assure you that a cartoon is FAR less offensive than your filthy, vile, disgusting urine, liberal – is enough to set off the entire Islamic world into a murderous rage.

And the answer is: because you KNOW Christianity is the only true source of peace on earth – as much as you hate it.  Just as you KNOW Islam is the source of violence just waiting to explode regardless of your dishonest rhetoric about “the religion of peace.”

Every single time a liberal so much as mentions the possibility of “radicalizing” the Muslim community, they affirm the spirit of violent hate just waiting to be unleashed by a religion that is manifestly violent.  Nobody worries about “radicalizing” Christians because you know full bloody well we don’t act that way.  You fear Muslims “radicalizing” if you so much as breathe wrong because no matter how much you want to suppress reality, bury the truth, deep, deep down you know how very wrong you are.

Go ahead, be a good liberal and follow the liberal way of burying your head in the sand so you won’t have to deal with REALITY:

The Bible spoke of wicked Israel before its judgment.  Let it speak to us before ours as well:

You boast, “We have struck a bargain to cheat death and have made a deal to dodge the grave. The coming destruction can never touch us, for we have built a strong refuge made of lies and deception.” — Isaiah 28:15

And we’ll see how long you keep your fool heads attached to your bodies the moment these people get to you:

If you bury your head in the sand to reality, you might as well lose your head, you deserve to lose your head – and we now live in an age where lose it you surely will.

We absolutely cannot continue to ignore the true reality – and yes, the terrifying reality – that is Islam.  We have to confront them with the truth and force them to acknowledge that truth and embrace the change they must embrace.  Or we will surely be fighting until the end of the planet in nuclear Armageddon.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How The Completely Failed Liberal Foreign Policy Makes Donald’s Trump ‘Ban Muslims’ Policy Make Sense

Obama keeps talking about “the global coalition to defeat ISIL.”  Because he is utterly deluded and completely dishonest.  The “coalition” is as much of a joke as Obama himself is.

I’ve written about our pathetic response – realizing that we’ re doing about 90% of the actual work of the “62 countries in the coalition” – and how USELESS it has been in comparison to when the United States actually intended to accomplish a military objective.

Obama boasts that his “coalition” has flown nearly 7,000 sorties since the start of Obama’s red line warning fiasco three years ago.  Do you know what a joke that is???  Let me put it into perspective: we flew more than 8,000 sorties IN THE FIRST FIVE DAYS of Operation Desert Storm.

When you compare Obama’s war with actual wars that our leaders wanted to truly make any real difference in, Obama becomes a joke.  We averaged 1,100 sorties a day against Iraq in 1991; under Obama it’s a laughable SEVEN sorties a day.

Then factor in that 75% of Obama’s sorties return with all of their weapons, having dropped no bombs and not having fired a damn SHOT.

Which puts Obama’s airstrikes and his worthless sixty nation coalition that have done NOTHING into the laugh-riot of his 4 or 5 fighters.  Who are undoubtedly dead now that Putin is bombing them.

We know that this THE most dishonest and cynical administration in the history of the republic has engaged in a disinformation campaign and has altered the intelligence provided to them by our professional analysts in order to make it appear Obama isn’t wildly failing.

Obama’s mission against Islamic State is designed to FAIL.  It is designed to appear like he’s doing something when he really is doing NOTHING.

Barack Obama’s rules of engagement are pathologically wicked because they are inherently self-defeating.  We can’t shoot; we can’t fight; we can’t defend ourselves unless there is no possible chance whatsoever that someone Obama defines as a non-combatant gets hurt forcing our pilots to return with guns and bombs fully loaded 75% of the damn time.  It’s somehow different, of course, when Obama unleashes his drone attacks that have murdered civilians a’plenty: Obama’s drone attacks murder innocents 90% of the time.  But apparently only Obama can “air-raid villages and kill civilians.”  And Obama also refuses to allow any attack against Islamic State that could somehow in some way contribute to global warming. So we can’t bomb the oil fields and of course we already couldn’t bomb anything else.

We end up with virtually NOTHING.  ESPECIALLY when you factor in all of the previous UTTER AND COMPLETE FAILS that are the mind, heart and roach soul that is Obama.  Consider his “four or five” fighters that we ultimately had to show for Obama’s $500 million program.

This is a man who is intent on deceiving the American people with blathering words – which he came out and did again today – while doing ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to actually keep America safe by taking the fight to the enemy.

And the Islamic State enemy has now taken the fight to us.  Literally within a couple of days of Obama assuring America that such a thing couldn’t happen.  And right after stupidly falsely assuring the American people that Islamic State was “contained” the DAY they unleashed terrorist hell in Paris, France.

The left has this mindset that only warmongers are “evil.”  But the useless cowards who do NOTHING as the warmongers keep attacking us are JUST AS EVIL.  I mean, is the father who abuses the mother of his children bad?  Yeah, he’s bad; but isn’t the man who walks away and DOES NOTHING to take care of his children and the mother of his children pretty damned evil, too?  THAT’S Obama; Obama is the useless turd who keeps promising to mail a check to help that ne NEVER mails after finding out that the electricity just got shut off and it’s getting cold and there’s no food in the house.

Obama’s foreign policy has FAILED.  It has CATOSTROPHICALLY failed.  Terrorism under Obama skyrocketed 150% the first five years of his administration between 2009 and 2013.  That skyrocketing rate turned into a rocket-ship rate as terrorism under Obama soared 81% last year over 2013.  And you just wait until they come up with the soaring rate of terrorism under our FOOL-in-Chief when they compare terrorism this year compared to 2014.

As a result of Obama’s cowardice to risk angering his demonic leftist base, Obama has created more refugees desperate for some place to go than in ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY:

Worldwide displacement hits all-time high as war and persecution increase
News Stories, 18 June 2015

GENEVA, June 18 (UNHCR) – Wars, conflict and persecution have forced more people than at any other time since records began to flee their homes and seek refuge and safety elsewhere, according to a new report from the UN refugee agency.

UNHCR’s annual Global Trends Report: World at War, released on Thursday (June 18), said that worldwide displacement was at the highest level ever recorded. It said the number of people forcibly displaced at the end of 2014 had risen to a staggering 59.5 million compared to 51.2 million a year earlier and 37.5 million a decade ago.

The increase represents the biggest leap ever seen in a single year. Moreover, the report said the situation was likely to worsen still further.

Globally, one in every 122 humans is now either a refugee, internally displaced, or seeking asylum. If this were the population of a country, it would be the world’s 24th biggest.

“We are witnessing a paradigm change, an unchecked slide into an era in which the scale of global forced displacement as well as the response required is now clearly dwarfing anything seen before,” said UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres. […]

And this coward lying fool actually keeps assuring us that his strategies are working!!!  Obama is like an even MORE demented version of Charlie Sheen who was ranting about how he was “winning” because he had “tiger blood” – only he’s destroying America with his moral insanity rather than merely his own life.

Barack Obama is a demon-possessed man and the Democrat Party is so-named because it is the party of “DEMOn-possessed bureauCRATS”.  We are watching the results of a ravenous cancer that has eaten America’s strength and resolve.  Barack Obama is that cancer.  And the Democrat Party is a metastasizing disease that will kill us.

I’m just going to state this as a bald fact: either the United States needs to impeach this wicked fool or else we need to pursue Donald Trump’s total ban of all Muslims.  One or the other.  Period.

The thing about Islam is that YES IT IS an intrinsically unstable and violent religion.

You need to understand something if you want to continue to live: The Christian Bible has passages that not only condone but actually command violence.  ALL of those passages are found in the oldest portions of the Old Testament.  When you contrast that to Islam and the Qur’an, you find a vastly worse issue with violence in the exact opposite order: there were two phases of Muhammad’s life, his Mecca life (when he was the underdog and preached peace and tolerance) and the Medina phase (where he became the superior military force and began preaching violence and hate for the infidel.  And while Jesus came as the Prince of Peace to preach, “Put away your swords,” Muhammad went from peaceful to vicious and ended up VICIOUS.

The Bible takes us from violence to peace and ends with peace and if you’re a Christian you therefore follow the way of peace.  The Qur’an takes us from peace to violence and if you’re a truly devout Muslim who follows the Prophet’s example you follow the way of violent jihad.

In Islam, there is a doctrine called “abrogation.”  If Muhammad said something that is mutually exclusive with something else, you view what he said LAST as the final word from Allah and you follow THAT.  Muhammad was a violent warmongerer who had been in dozens of military campaigns for ruthless conquest and had dozens MORE planned at the time of his death.  Only 100 years after his death, Muhammad’s followers – properly interpreting their Prophet – poured across Christendom and would have forcibly Islamicized all of Europe had they not been stopped dead in their tracks on the other side of the continent as Charles the Hammer broke them at the Battle of Tours.  Rabid Muslim hordes stormed St. Augustine’s Christian realm in Africa and put all the Christians to the scimitar; they poured into Christian Spain and would have violently seized that Christian country for Islam but for El Cid.  They stormed the Christian Byzantium Empire and forced the Emperor in besieged Constantinople to ask for help from the Pope which became the Crusades.

The ONLY time Muslims have ever been “peaceful” is when they have been FORCED to be so because a superior military power would crush them if they were anything else.  Which is why Muhammad DID call for peace and tolerance when he was the inferior power during his first phase in Mecca.

I listen to the demonization of Democrats who claim that any TRUE statement linking Islam with violence will “radicalize” otherwise people Muslims and realize these people are truly beyond deranged hypocrites.  I mean, stop and think about it: remember Piss Christ?  It actually took liberals TWENTY-EIGHT YEARS to take that hateful piece of “art” down.  And they only ended up doing so because a rising number of people were rightly pointing out how demonically hypocritical the left was for saying they wouldn’t ever show hateful anti-Muslim images but they had no problem whatsoever showing hateful anti-Christian images.  In the same demonically hypocritical liberal vein, remember Chris Ofili’s 1996 ”Holy Virgin Mary” (a presentation of the Virgin Mary covered with elephant dung and collaged pornographic images)?  Let’s face an unpleasant fact, liberals: you didn’t have to worry about Christians going ape-poop and rioting and murdering hundreds or thousands of people, did you?  And yet there is a terribly unpleasant awareness that Muslims will – guaranteed WILL – erupt in mass violence if you do to them what you do to Christians all the time.  But being hypocrites and liars as you are, you refuse to give Christians ANY credit for our peacefulness that is wrapped up in our Christ while you kow-tow to the violence that is wrapped up in Islam’s Prophet.  And it never ceases to amaze me to this very day how absolutely determined you are, liberal, to ascribe to Christianity and to Christians “terrorism” or “terrorists” – such as the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building by Timothy McVeigh or the shooting of the Planned Parenthood clinic by Robert Dear – when there is ABSOLUTELY ZERO REASON TO CLAIM THEY WERE “CHRISTIAN.”  McVeigh was an avowed agnostic who hadn’t been to a church since childhood; by the same standard, no one could call Barack Obama anything other than a MUSLIM.  And Robert Dear  was basically a crazed man whom, “If you talked to him, nothing with him was very cognitive — topics all over place,” as his neighbor pointed out.  Neither of them were or had ever been active in a church, or ever claimed that what they did had been done in the name of Jesus.  But the same liberals who immediately claim “Christian” to anyone who does anything violent who even could THEORETICALLY be called a Christian utterly refuse to acknowledge that Islam had anything to do with a terrorist act no matter how much the lifelong Muslim attackers scream “Allahu Akbar!”  It is an amazing act of abject double-standard hypocrisy.

Look, if Islam really didn’t have anything to do with terrorism, then we would be able to insult Islam and the Prophet all we wanted and we wouldn’t have to worry about any terrorist or violent response; the same way we clearly don’t with insults to Christianity and to Christ because liberals’ attacks in and of themselves prove that Christians don’t respond with violence.

We wouldn’t have to worry about Muslims becoming radicalized by rhetoric unless there was a terrifying undercurrent of radicalization within Islam to begin with.

Islam has a giant inherent problem; it has the problem of a violent Prophet whose last commands to his followers were calls for violent jihad.

But that’s only part of the problem today.  That’s always been a terrifying problem.  But Barack Obama has given us a NEW terrifying problem that has guaranteed that the crisis within Islam WILL come to our shores and ultimately through our doors.

As I’ve already pointed out, there are now MILLIONS of refugees created by Barack Hussein Obama’s demon-possessed policies.  And instead of dealing with the root cause of that refugee crisis, Obama as the lying craven coward and pathological demagogue that he is instead began to demonize Republicans for not wanting to allow ten thousands and yes TENS of thousands of Muslim refugees to enter the United States from Syria.

So here’s the thing, actually THINGS: 1) Islamic State immediately boasted that they would infiltrate the refugees and enter target countries; 2) they did just that when TWO terrorists with Syrian passports came into France and initiated violent jihad in the Paris bloodbath; 3) the Syrian government has completely broken down; we have no contacts with them; we cannot even possibly spot terrorists coming from there; 4) then we learned that Islamic State had captured a passport card machine as well as blank passport forms to create passports that are in every appearance “official”; 5) then we get terrorist woman who entered America in spite of having attended a radical school only to leave that school for another because the first was not radical ENOUGH, and to post Facebook promises that she would join violent jihad BEFORE applying to come into America – and 6) Obama let her in on a visa!!!  When you consider 7) that the Democrat Party demands that we let in tens of thousands of potential terrorists, whom they have proven beyond any doubt that we cannot possibly vet with any reliability, the only reasonable conclusion is that the Democrat Party is a clear and present danger to the United States of America.

But the amazing thing is that Democrats actually, insanely, have a REASON to allow thousands of terrorists to flood into America: because every new terrorist attack amounts to a new “justification” to confiscate the guns from the American people that they have dreamed of doing since it worked out so well for Hitler and Stalin and Mao in securing their unrivaled power over all opposition.

So Obama mocks the Republicans for not wanting to let in “widows and orphans.”  In spite of the facts that 1) the vast majority of “Syrian refugees” are men of military age and 2) WE JUST HAD A WOMAN WHO WAS A “WIDOW” AND LEFT BEHIND AN “ORPHAN” MURDER 14 AMERICANS AND TRY TO MURDER NEARLY TWO DOZEN OTHER AMERICANS.

Islam has a pathological problem with violence that Democrats ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT confront Islam and the Islamic world with.  There is absolutely NO REASON for Islam as a religion or Islamic countries to try to reform because the left is united in saying that Islamic terrorism – which Obama calls only “violent extremism” because he won’t allow ANY association with Islam – has nothing to do with actual “Islam.”  And so no one from within Islam will ever rise to the occasion and fight.  They won’t because they have no reason to.  And there is no reason to because Obama and Democrats refuse to allow them to have a reason to fight.

So this phantom 62 nation coalition that is doing nothing is led by a United States under Obama that is doing nothing.  For the record, as CNN’s Wolf Blitzer reports, the Muslim nations that allegedly are part of this “coalition” of Obama’s have launched fewer than 5% of the laughably pathetic airstrikes (most of which return to base with all their bombs and ammunition) and NONE of the airstrikes since August.  Where are the damn Muslims?  And the answer is they are nowhere to be found.

I mean, think about it: either Muslims are doing these terrible things and Islam needs to confront their own, as conservatives maintain and have BEEN maintaining, or else this has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam and therefore Muslims don’t need to do a damn thing to deal with it.

So if you want to have a billion radicalized Muslims with Muslims doing NOTHING to prevent a coming bloodbath, just vote Democrat and bloodbath will come to you.

If we don’t go in there and wipe out the roach nest that is all of Islamic State territory; if we do not confront Islam and FORCE them to in Obama’s words “fundamentally transform” Islam, we have no hope of winning this cultural war for the soul of the world.

And a major reason is that “secular humanism” is simply a nihilistic, hollow façade that is not worth fighting for.

Look, we need to either confront Islam with its terrorism and we need to go into Syria and Afghanistan and anywhere else Islamic State has metastasized and exterminate this threat to the world or we need as a nation to shut our borders to all Muslims and ultimately even forcibly deport all the Muslims who are already here.

You need to understand that we already had a massive terrorist attack by the children of Muslim refugees who came here: remember the Tsarnaev brothers who bombed the Boston Marathon?  Their parents showed up on a tourist visa and then claimed refugee status and their children ultimately became radicalized Muslim terrorists.  The fact is that Muslim refugees are quickly becoming embittered and radicalized in Europe even if they didn’t start out that way.  Look at what is NOT being reported in the mainstream media about what is beginning to happen in Europe from Obama’s “poor widows and orphans” that the media doesn’t want you to know about.

You are going to see more and more anger and bitterness from  these refugees.  Even if they weren’t terrorists when they started out.  If you look up words like “burn” “Muslims” “rioting” “France” on Google you’ll see that virtually every single year since 2005 Muslim youth have violently rioted and burned.  You’ll see “No-go zones” in Muslim communities where even the POLICE are terrified to enter.  And that bitter spirit is going to go everywhere that large numbers of Muslims go.  Because that’s just what happens, like it or not.

End the refugee crisis by going in and fighting the Islamic terrorist threat and dealing with Islam’s pathological tendency to produce terrorists or else ban all Muslims.

Those are our only two choices.

Me, I’m for the first one: I’m for not merely idiotically demanding that we keep bringing in tens of thousands of the millions of refugees Obama has created; I’m for ending the reason that we HAVE millions of refugees by giving these poor dispossessed and desperate people back their land and their homes that were usurped by a vast terrorist army.

That won’t happen under ANY Democrat.

Which means we’re ultimately left with either facing a hundred San Bernardinos a day in the near future or else we’re left with banning all Muslims.

That’s the deranged logic that gives Donald Trump his growing poll numbers right now.  He’s a creature manufactured by Obama’s horrifying weakness and morally idiotic policies.  And the only way we’re going to get rid of a Donald Trump is to get rid of the Barack Obama who made him possible.

Donald Trump offers a bad solution.  Should we ban all Muslims?  We shouldn’t ban all of ANYBODY.  But a bad solution can and will become the best solution if we don’t take the only solution – going into Islamic State’s very heart and killing the monster once for all – that can win this fight for our culture’s very survival.

 

 

Obama Invites Muslim Radicals Into United States: ‘Welcome To America! We Hope You Enjoy Your Glorious Jihad!’

As we speak, Barack Obama is rigidly demanding that the United States accept a minimum of 10,000 Syrian refugees.

The other Democrats in the presidential field, including most ominously Hillary Clinton, argues that we should bring in 65,000 Syrian refugees.  Just for starters.

Barack Obama savagely mocked and demonized Republicans who basically said, “Hold the hell on there” and pointing out that we have absolutely ZERO way of validating any of these people flooding out of Syria because of Obama’s epic fail due to his refusal to even acknowledge a war on terror, let alone actually fight it.

Obama claimed that the Syrian refugees constituted “widows and orphans.”  Because after all he’s a wicked liar who loves taking cheap shots.

Of course, ALL of Obama’s talking points have now been proven to have been outright lies.  Obama just claimed that Islamic State was “contained.” Literally hours before they unleashed a devastating terrorist attack in Paris.  Right.  His own Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and now his own Secretary of Defense have publicly stated, like HELL they are.

How about this one Obama promised us on December 2 that was being taped AS THE SAN BERNARDINO ATTACK WAS HAPPENING:

Washington (CNN)President Barack Obama said in an interview that aired Thursday that he is confident the U.S. is safe from a Paris-style attack from ISIS and that American law enforcement is well equipped to protect the nation during the holidays.

“ISIL will not pose an existential threat to us. They are a dangerous organization like al Qaeda was, but we have hardened our defenses,” Obama told CBS. “The American people should feel confident that, you know, we are going to be able to defend ourselves and make sure that, you know, we have a good holiday and go about our lives.”

Yeah, right, you lying fool turd.  There are 35 people who are either dead or almost ended dead who would beg to differ with your frankly idiotic assessment.

These things follow Obama claiming – FALSELY and DISHONESTLY claiming – that Islamic State was “JayVee” even AFTER they had captured entire cities on the way to establishing the caliphate Obama allowed them to build.  “You didn’t build that,” Obama said, smearing the small businesses and claiming government actually builds everything.  Okay, fine, ISIS didn’t build their caliphate; OBAMA DID.  Before that, Obama was outright lying to the American people prior to the 2012 election falsely claiming that his policies had terrorists on the run when we now now that the truth was the exact OPPOSITE.

Obama’s own FBI director is forced to admit this tragic reality about terrorists coming into the United States under Obama:

COMEY: “Our ability to monitor them has not kept pace. In fact, it is going in the wrong direction. So, our ability to find people hiding in the United States looking to do bad things to root out all kinds of organized criminal factors is steadily being impaired. That’s the problem.”

Obama mocked over “widows and orphans.”

Hey, Obama.   Tashfeen Malik was a “widow” in the moments before she went down in a hail of gunfire trying to murder as many police as possible.  She left behind an “orphan,” a UNITED STATES CITIZEN thanks to Obama, who will now be raised by a vicious and highly radicalized family.

So, yeah, I’m scared of widows and orphans.  Because thanks to Obama, we have “widows” murdering us and little “Barack Hussein Obama II” being raised to murder us in the future.

We already HAD an attack in Paris in which an Islamic State terrorist with a SYRIAN PASSPORT took part in a massive terror attack (that Obama assured us couldn’t happen here):

One of the men who attacked Paris held an emergency passport or similar document, according to an unnamed French senator who was briefed by the French Ministry of the Interior. The senator told CNN the bomber falsely declared himself to be a Syrian named Ahmad al Muhammad, born on September 10, 1990, and was allowed to enter Greece on October 3. From there he moved to Macedonia, then Serbia and Croatia, where he registered in the Opatovac refugee camp, the lawmaker said. Eventually, he made his way to Paris, where he was one of three men who blew themselves up at the Stade de France.

Now we have a terrorist – a TERRORIST WHO WAS ALREADY DREAMING OF JIHAD WHEN OBAMA INVITED HER INTO AMERICA – who Obama didn’t even bother to VET:

The FBI Director James Comey has admitted that the two San Bernardino terrorists showed signs of radicalization prior to Tashfeen Malik’s acceptance into the United States on a “fiancé” visa. Comey notes that Malik showed signs of radicalization as far back as 2013 but was still admitted into the United States as the FBI missed the warning signs when approving the terrorist’s visa. Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, would go on to kill 14 people and injure 21 by opening fire on San Bernardino County Health Department Christmas party.

Among other things, Tashfeen Malik gave a bogus address that didn’t even EXIST.  She attended a radical school.  She had already expressed radical views online BEFORE coming to America.  But she was allowed to sail right through the pathetic screening process.  And once in America they began looking up terrorist websites, contacting terrorists, pretty much do everything but put a giant banner on the roof of their house that read “We are TERRORISTS.”  But it’s doubtful even that would have got the authorities’ attention given how incompetent Obama is.

And then let’s just conduct a smell test: this woman with a radicalized background from Pakistan who travelled to Saudi Arabia goes on some Muslim internet dating site to find a likeminded “American” who shared her love of jihad.  And she “online dated” a man with whom she has no connection whatsoever.  You know, when she’d never dated in her life and wouldn’t even show her rather homely face.

But what the hell: Obama said, “C’mon in, folks!”

And just to make it even BETTER, Obama and his libturd pal Jerry Brown give the husband a government job as a health inspector so he could go into any damn school he wanted where our KIDS are.  He could walk into our restaurants.  Meanwhile, Tashfeen was studying to be a pharmacist so she could play with our medication.  You can imagine Democrats would have given her a great government job, too.

We’re actually probably lucky: they both could have killed hundreds or even THOUSANDS of Americans by poisoning us.  Thank Allah it wasn’t a violent enough way to kill us.  At least, it isn’t YET.

The bottom line is this: we had about a thousand times better chance to properly vet and recognize Tashfeen Malik than we do ANY of the thousands of “Syrian refugees” for whom we have ZERO WAY to validate their documents.  We have ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE of knowing who these people are.  Syria is not only an enemy state with whom we have no relations whatsoever; it is a failed state whose government systems have fundamentally broken down.

In all probability, Islamic State has seized its own passport printing machine and has blank passports so they can authenticate their terrorists.  You know, if Obama even BOTHERS to look at the passports given the fact that he utterly failed to keep terrorist jihadist Tashfeen Malik out of America even though she only came here to murder as many of us as she could.

It is also very likely that Islamic State has long-since infiltrated terrorists into America with those aforementioned Syrian passports that we are only now beginning to become stupidly aware of were being printed for more than a year and a half now.

But amazingly, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton not only don’t care, but literally demand tens of thousands more possible terrorists to flood into America.

Call it murder by political correctness.  Call it “retroactive abortion by jihad.”  Because a terrorist woman has “the right to choose,” after all.

And to make it even crazier and more evil, Obama and Democrats not only demand that we bring terrorists into America in the name of political correctness, but also that we strip away the American people’s constitutional right to protect themselves and their families FROM these terrorists.

Add to that that Obama Democrats have now turned our police into murder suspects.  They are staying in their cars because Democrats riot every time they shoot a criminal who happens to be black.  Mobs of young people with their smart phone cameras are surrounding the police who DO try to get out their cars as they scream taunts and threats.  It’s going to get easier and easier for terrorists to attack and do a lot of damage before they’re finally gunned down because Obama breathed life into the vile “Black Lives Matter” movement that cynically couldn’t care LESS about the OTHER 99 percent of the black lives that are murdered by other black people in liberal cities.

And then there is the fact that in the San Bernardino terrorist massacre, we had the chance to prevent the attack from even happening because a neighborhood witness saw some really bizarre things going on in Farook’s garage.  But Obama and Democrats – now including Obama’s Attorney General – intimidated her from wanting to “profile” and “be a racist.”  And knowing that a school was viciously attacked by Obama because they detained a Muslim kid who had made a clock in a suitcase that looked EXACTLY like a bomb, YOU’D BETTER SHUT THE HELL UP.

Obama has miserably failed to keep Americans safe, but that’s okay; because now he’s going to try to make it impossible for the American people to keep themselves safe.

Are you a liberal and don’t like guns?  Then you are a psychotic demoniac fool for not having screamed for Obama’s impeachment: more than 100 MILLION guns have been sold as a result of his fool presidency as Obama has panicked tens of millions of Americans into buying guns.  Between the fact that Barack Obama personally epitomizes a direct threat to the freedom of the American people and due to the fact that Obama has utterly failed to keep us safe from external threats, Barack Obama is the gun salesman of the CENTURY.

Rest assured Obama is going to do everything that the spirit of fascism in America can do to take away your rights and your ability to protect your rights.

As a result of Obama’s failed presidency, let me quote the New York Times as it explores why Donald Trump is rising:

“Americans are more fearful about the likelihood of another terrorist attack than at any other time since the weeks after Sept. 11, 2001, a gnawing sense of dread…”

The problem with Democrats is that they live in a DELUSION and have NO contact with the actual real world.  It literally doesn’t matter to them if the cockroach fecal matter they have in place of brains produces THE EXACT OPPOSITE EFFECT from what they intend.

Everything Obama came into office declaring about terrorism was either an outright lie or the belief of a naïve fool.  In fact, terrorism has SKYROCKETED BECAUSE WE ELECTED OBAMA.  We watched terrorism skyrocket between the day Obama took office and 2014.  But we aint seen NOTHIN’ yet: terrorism skyrocketed ANOTHER 81% since 2014.  And you watch how it explodes this year over last year.  We are truly in trouble because this blathering fool we foolishly chose to lead us into delusion and then into hell.