Depraved Divider-In-Chief Barack Obama FIRST POTUS In ENTIRE HISTORY OF REPUBLIC To Refuse To Honor Funeral Of Sitting Justice

This just really and truly boggles the mind:

Megyn Kelly stated Thursday evening on The Kelly File that she can find no instance in history where a sitting president of the United States has failed to attend the funeral of a sitting Supreme Court Justice. It’s an unprecedented move on the part of Obama, who once again fails to uphold his duty as president, represent the country and set an example for the American people.

I admit that I didn’t agree with the whole “car czar” program, but I finally agree with something that Obama’s handpicked car czar, Steven Rattner, said:

“If we want to reduce partisanship, we can start by honoring great public servants who we disagree with.”

The first American president to shirk attending a funeral of a sitting Supreme Court Justice (while demanding he be able to replace that Justice on the Court).  All I can say is  that I suppose history continues unbroken – BECAUSE BARACK OBAMA IS NOT AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT; HE IS AN UNAMERICAN PRESIDENT.

An incredibly Obama has said over and over since Scalia’s death that he has the right and the duty to nominate a replacement for Scalia.

That’s actually technically true, and all sides affirm that fact.  But Obama had every bit as much of a right and a duty to honor the Justice he was demanding to replace at his funeral.

And since Obama callously and cynically and decisively shirked that particular right and duty, the United States Senate – which has the right and duty to “advise and consent” on ANY presidential nomination, has the right and duty to ADVISE Obama NOT to exploit this death by nominating anyone and the right and duty to absolutely REFUSE to consent to anybody Obama nominates.

The SAME Constitution that gives a president the right to nominate a Supreme Court Justice to fill a vacancy gives the Senate the right to say, “Up yours!” to a presidential nomination.

As a Senator himself, Barack Obama FILIBUSTERED Republican nominees to the Supreme Court:

However, the truth is that, when they were senators, Obama, Biden, and Clinton all tried to filibuster Justice Alito’s nomination to the court – and other Democratic party leaders such as NY Senator Chuck Schumer reveled in the idea that they were able to block every Bush #43 nomination to the federal courts.

We also have the example of Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden who in 1992 said when there was just a POSSIBILITY that George H.W. Bush MIGHT be able to nominate a Supreme Court Justice:

“It is my view that if the president goes the way of Presidents Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until ever — until after the political campaign season is over.” — Sen. Joe Biden, June 25, 1992

So all you’ve got to do is just refer to this as “the Biden Rule.”  But it’s a rule and it was started by Democrats.  And now they’re screaming at us for following THEIR rules.

Democrats have a LONG history of doing the very thing they now claim is so evil:

While Democrats in the upper chamber – including Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and former Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, both of which called for blocking former President George W. Bush’s nominations – have slammed the GOP for its decision not to consider a nominee until after a new president is elected, Democrats have not always held that stance. The Democrat-controlled Senate passed a resolution in 1960 preventing a recess appointment, much to the dismay of Republicans.

As first reported by The Washington Post – S.RES. 334, also known as Expressing the Sense of the Senate That The President Should Not Make Recess Appointments to the Supreme Court, Except to Prevent or End a Breakdown in the Administration of the Court’s Business – passed the Senate in a 48-33 vote in an attempt to prevent former President Dwight Eisenhower from filling a seat last-minute.

Democrats have frequently played this same game.   New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, now the Senate Minority Leader and leader of all the Senate Democrats, said when a Republican was president that the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”

And oh, I can go on.  The Democratic Party is the party that turned the name of a Supreme Court nominee into a verb by so utterly pouring out their demonic hate to poison the nomination that the process became known as “Borking.”  It had never been done before the Party of Cockroach Fascism started it.  This infamous Ted Kennedy slander was the worst of the slanders:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

Robert Bork was a good man and eminently qualified to sit on the Court.  But Democrats are truly breathtakingly evil and hypocritical people.

Speaking of “being qualified,” Barack Obama actually openly ACKNOWLEDGED that Judge Roberts was qualified.  But that didn’t MATTER then:

Obama admitted that Roberts was eminently qualified. He praised him highly.

“There is absolutely no doubt in my mind Judge Roberts is qualified to sit on the highest court in the land. Moreover, he seems to have the comportment and the temperament that makes for a good judge. He is humble, he is personally decent, and he appears to be respectful of different points of view. It is absolutely clear to me that Judge Roberts truly loves the law. He couldn’t have achieved his excellent record as an advocate before the Supreme Court without that passion for the law…”

But, no he wasn’t going to vote for him anyway.

“I ultimately have to give more weight to his deeds and the overarching political philosophy that he appears to have shared with those in power than to the assuring words that he provided me in our meeting. The bottom line is this: I will be voting against John Roberts’ nomination.”

In short, Obama chose to vote against Roberts because of his perceived conservative politics. Nothing else.

Republicans have the SAME right and duty to reject any judge Obama nominates simply because they don’t agree with Obama’s “overarching political philosophy.”  Period.

Democrats are abject, disgusting, despicable hypocrite vermin.  And their past actions need to now catch up to them.  They need to be exposed for what they are.

Here’s another thing: the Senate is now firmly in Republican hands (after disgraceful Democrats were caught being evil maybe a million times too often).  But when Democrats owned the Senate, they shoved their crap right down the Republicans’ throats and changed the damn Senate rules to do it with a process that was so toxic to the Constitution that it was called “the nuclear option.”

On November 21, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared that “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” by Republican filibusters had made the confirmation process “completely unworkable.”[1] As a result, he said, Democrats were forced to eliminate virtually all nomination filibusters. […]

For nearly all of its history, proceeding to a final vote on a matter before the Senate required a supermajority.

But not when Democrats stole the show.

Now, quite simply, they should be allowed to eat the fecal matter that forced down the throats of everyone who disagreed with them when they were in control.

The Republican majority Senate will do what the hell it wants and the Democrat minority will shut the hell up.  By the Democrats’ own damn rules.

If Obama gave a flying damn about the unity of the United States that he has so fractured and broken that on the Republican side we have Donald Trump and on the Democratic side we have socialist Bernie Sanders, he would yield in this election year and allow the incoming president to nominate a Justice with the support of a majority of the people.

But Obama DOESN’T give a flying damn about uniting America.  That was, as I pointed out only months into his dishonest presidency, merely one of his signature lies.

And Barack Obama just officially DISQUALIFIED himself from having ANY right to nominate Justice Antonin Scalia’s replacement by his pretty, cheap, and depraved refusal to honor that great man.

I think it’s beyond safe to say that were it Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s funeral, Barak Obama would have bothered to at least pretend he is a legitimate president and shown up.

But Obama is a rabid ideologue, so the demons that control every move he makes would not allow him to step into that cathedral to honor Justice Antonin Scalia.

For the record, I actually have far more respect for BOTH Ginsburg (whose opinions I despise) as WELL as Scalia (whose opinions I affirmed): because both of them were able to do what Barack Obama has NEVER ONE SINGLE TIME IN HIS LIFE been able to do; they were able to look past their differences and find the things they held in common and unite as dear friends around those things.  That says a lot to praise about both of these figures.

Just as it says a lot about just how petty and vindictive a figure Barack Obama is.

Antonin Scalia believed that “there is no conflict between loving God and loving one’s country.”  But Barack Obama is a malignant narcissist blasphemer who believes that HE is God and that to serve anyone or anything BUT Obama is sin.

The funeral is over.  Obama never bothered to show up.  Because Obama is a disgrace to the presidency and a disgrace to the United States of America that Justice Antonin Scalia spent his life faithfully serving.  And even Ruth Bader Ginsburg would affirm that fact.

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Depraved Divider-In-Chief Barack Obama FIRST POTUS In ENTIRE HISTORY OF REPUBLIC To Refuse To Honor Funeral Of Sitting Justice”

  1. Chris Benito Says:

    Man, I guess I was right after all. Anyone who hates Obama is a racist, bigoted, black-hating turd. No doubt about that.

    Presidents don’t visit concentration camps. It might draw attention to colonialism, illegal detention and torture. I for one would not want our president visiting a disgraceful place like that. It should be handed back to the Cubans. It has no strategic value and is a vestige of the days of colonialism.

    It is ALL because he’s black. That is the cold hard fact. You are a racist, you are a bigot and you are a black-hating klansman k-nt! That’s one of the reasons Trump is winning. Trump is a racist, bigoted, black-hating Klansman scumbags that hates people who aren’t White or Christian.

    It’s because (to them) Obama is a N-gger, but they can’t call him a N-gger, cause that would prove liberals were right. Hatred of Obama stems from racism and bigotry.

    Exactly what did Bush and Cheney do for you in the 8 years they allowed wall street to run amock and got rich off a war you and I paid for with our Social Security benefits? Absolutely nothing but your prejudice blinds you to all the benefits President Obama has put in place after Bush and Cheney brought our country to its knees.

    Too bad Fox missed Reagan skipping the Abe Fortas and Potter Stewart funerals, or Goerge Bush dissing the funeral for William Rehnquist. Maybe it’s only white Presidents who have permission to skip Supreme Court funerals. History will record the Age of Obama as the era when the Republican Party and its media cheerleaders were infiltrated and controlled by the Ku Klux Klan. They will not be missed.

    These same creeps yapping about respect are the same creeps who haven’t shown this President an ounce of respect since he has been in office.

    Scalia was an evil, flawed man who twisted the law to his perverted use, gleefully accepted bribes, refused ro recuse himdelf ever and held back significant progress for 30 years. His “originalism” was nonsensical and convuluted at best but truly dangerous and life-threatening at worst. Not a “brilliant jurist. Scalia was so hateful, bigoted, narrow-minded and self righteous, it is amazing the hypocrite even got two minutes of the president’s time!

    People like YOU are the “disgrace”! http://thumbnails113.imagebam.com/45968/aa66b1459674351.jpg

    I think that it’s pretty clear who’s “stupidous”!! (And racist, bigoted and hateful).

    Why? All because that hate having a black man as President, why else try to bring a racist, bigoted, sexist, klansman kin like Trump in the White House? because he’s white.

  2. Michael Eden Says:

    Chris Benito,

    I truly marvel at you and at everyone I encounter who is like you.

    Why did you hate Bush so much? For one simple reason and for one simple reason ONLY: “because he is white.” And YOU are the worst, most evil, most depraved kind of racist white-hating bigot.

    There. See how simple it is? All I have to do is judge you and demonize you by the EXACT IDENTICAL SAME STANDARD that you demonize me by.

    And, of course, if racism is bad, THEN YOU SHOULDN’T BE ONE.

    You get ugly at me because I “haven’t shown this President an ounce of respect since he has been in office.” But you are too blind in your racist hatred to see that ALL I’M DOING IS WHAT YOU DID TO PRESIDENTS REAGAN AND BUSH. Because they were white and you have nothing but rabid racist hate for white people.

    So on your own theory, you are no better than me for all of your hate. At the very worst I’m just a mirror of you: you hate white people for the very simple reason that they’re white and why shouldn’t I hate you for the very same reason???

    The crime is that so many black people have so rabidly turned from Martin Luther King’s critical valuable adage that the content of one’s character is more important than the color of one’s skin. And I’ll just state it categorically: you LOVE racism because you get to keep being a victim and you can blame somebody else for the absolute failure that is your life.

    The fact remains: in the ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NO SITTING PRESIDENT HAS EVER SKIPPED OUT ATTENDING THE FUNERAL OF A SITTING SUPREME COURT JUSTICE. Until now.

    I long ago documented something that Obama promised. He promised that he would transcend the political divide. The New York Times reported it this way:

    WASHINGTON — At the core of Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign is a promise that he can transcend the starkly red-and-blue politics of the last 15 years, end the partisan and ideological wars and build a new governing majority.

    To achieve the change the country wants, he says, “we need a leader who can finally move beyond the divisive politics of Washington and bring Democrats, independents and Republicans together to get things done.”

    But this promise leads, inevitably, to a question: Can such a majority be built and led by Mr. Obama, whose voting record was, by one ranking, the most liberal in the Senate last year?

    FACT: Obama is THE most divisive president we have EVER had. http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/06/politics/obama-gallup-approval-rating-polarized/

    I was able to write an article documenting the answer as “no way in hell!” shortly after Obama took office. https://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/obama-promise-to-transcend-political-divide-his-signature-failure-and-lie/ And Obama has been pissing in the eye of Republicans ever since.
    Obama is nothing more than an extremist leftist thug who lied to the American people and promised them something he had NO intention of fulfilling – being a president for all the people – and the outrage you see is the fruit of the toxin that is this lying thug Obama.

    Obama HIMSELF said he was going to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.” Where is the compromise in that attitude, you rabid fool? There was NEVER a spirit of, “I’m going to work with Republicans to make changes for the good of all Americans.” It was from the very start, “I’m going to fundamentally transform this country and demonize everybody who gets in my way.” Obama’s attitude toward Republicans was, “I won and elections have consequences.” But this cockroach hypocrite wasn’t willing to abide by that when the Republicans took first the House in 2010 and then both the House AND the Senate in 2012. Any more than this lying, dishonest hypocrite Obama was willing to abide by HIS OWN filibuster of Supreme Court justices and now claims that Republicans are evil for being exactly like HIM.

    If Obama had even wanted to make a TOKEN EFFORT to fulfill his promise, he would have attended the funeral of the sitting Supreme Court Justice he was trying to death even before the man’s body was cold.

    I just provided example after example of Democrats doing the VERY SAME THING THAT YOU NOW SAY IS SO EVIL. Barack Obama filibustering nominees for the Supreme Court, Barack Obama saying it didn’t matter if a judge was qualified, he was going to vote him down anyway, now- VP Joe Biden saying no president should nominate a justice in an election year until AFTER the election, now Senate Minority Leader Sen Chuck Schumer saying the same damn thing, etc.

    And you don’t even CARE about the facts, because you are a rabid racist par excellence.

    And you lack BOTH the brains and the integrity to deal with the TRUTH.

    On your utterly pathologically idiotic view, I’ll be fine with a President Hillary Clinton because after all she’s white and the ONLY reason I don’t like Obama is because he’s black. And what a complete and utter roach you are because I am telling the world Hillary Clinton will be even WORSE than Obama.

    Because for all your racist hate, I’m NOT like you. I would have been FINE with a President Herman Cain; I’d be fine right NOW with a President Ben Carson. Who for the factual record are both TWICE as “black” as your Obama.

    Now, I’m white, so I can know for an absolute fact that you rabidly hate me. And so I just really don’t want to talk to someone I know hates me on pure account for my race any more. So bye bye.

    It doesn’t matter to a hard core racist like YOU that Democrats presided over the worst genocide in modern times as one million blacks were literally butchered to death in Rwanda. Bill Clinton refused to call it a “genocide” and so never lifted a FINGER that he and your leftist United Nations would have been FORCED to lift if they’d just been honest. But you don’t give a DAMN about one million black people hacked to death with machetes. Because you are nothing but a hypocrite and a liar.

    Just like you don’t give one flying DAMN about “black lives matter” as long as those are the tens of thousands of blacks who are being killed in Democrat cities by other blacks. No, you are nothing more than a lying, rabid, race-baiting ideologue who is only filled with hate for white people. And so you blame them for everything including what a truly vile specimen you are.

    I am always just utterly amazed when I encounter a bitter soul who is so fixated on race that he or she can’t – WON’T – see past the color of skin to look at things like facts and worldviews. They don’t even EXIST for you: what a person thinks or believes, the character a person has, is NOTHING to you. All you need to know is the color of someone and you are filled with hate for that person if they’re not the color you like. So why would you be angry at anyone who is the same way the opposite way? Because you’re nothing but a hypocrite, that’s why.

  3. FMC Says:

    Wow! I always love it when you slam a roach liberal!

    Anyway, you can now add Nancy Reagan to the long list of conservative funerals that Barry will not attend. Not sure what he is doing, but it wouldn’t surprise me if he was meeting with a communist dictator, terrorist or Black Lives Matter leader, instead.

    Obama is an arrogant ideologue without any iota of class. He sees everything through the Marxist prism of his eyes.

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    FMC,
    It is beyond sad when anyone – whether a liberal OR a conservative – comes to the defense of the indefensible.

    And Obama’s refusal to attend Scalia’s funeral even as he was itching to replace Scalia with someone who would piss on every value that Scalia stood for is utterly indefensible.

    Obama should have gone to that funeral. Period.

    But no, this turd is the kind who would have defended Hitler’s final solution because he’s a Nazi and that’s just what Nazis do.

    Add to that fact that this turd was every bit as much of a racist as the worst Aryan Nazi who ever lived, and you get poisonous venom and nothing but.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: