Does Fact That Democrats Let Out 22-Year-Old Monsters With 6 Felony Convictions Out On Street Have Anything To Do With Violence In Our Cities?

We live in the most amazing time in the entire history of the human race.  Ignorant and depraved and pathologically narcissistic people who vote stupidly despite more information being available than at any time in history are rapidly plunging what used to be the greatest nation on earth into a dinosaur-type extinction.

Basically it comes down to this: we now have a majority of frankly bad people in America.  Bad people ultimately despise the truth and literally prefer to believe lies.  Bad people don’t care about any actual “justice” or “fairness”; if they can cynically exploit the power of an increasingly tyrannous government to confiscate the result of one group of people’s hard work to “redistribute” it to themselves, they’re all in.  Bad people are perennially “butthurt” and constantly emote in the Way of Cain who murdered his brother Abel and somehow still amazingly saw himself as the victim.

Bad people vote DEMOCRAT.  Democrats know full-damn-well that criminals and crooks and predators and murders and rapists and drug dealers and pedophiles and every other form of human cockroach vote DEMOCRAT.   And Democrats have proven it: the Virginia governor (lifelong Clinton associate Terry McAuliffe, Democrat) ordered criminally-convicted felons to have their voting rights restored so they could vote for the party of evil and allow a wicked political party to do to the nation in public what they do to helpless innocent people in the darkness.  The State Supreme Court overturned him the first time, but it’s really important to elect Democrats and only the most vile people will do it, so he came back and again ordered the worst human filth on earth to be able to say “I’m with her!” and vote for Hillary.  Oh, yes, that Democrat governor is getting out the vote for Hillary.  The more criminals, the more illegal immigrants, the more cheating, the better for Democrats.  That’s why they WILL NOT allow any system that will in any way, shape or form even make a slight attempt to ensure our elections are actually legitimate where elections would be determined by decent registered voters.

The most evil people in America are the most reliable Democrat base.  FACT.

And we are living in the aftermath of the hostile takeover of the decent by the vile.  With the decent being forced to shut up in imposed shame by the rhetorical bullying and slandering tool called “political correctness.”

It’s just amazing to watch the media work.  When Donald Trump changes his position on illegal immigration (and yeah, he did) he’s “flip-flopping” and the same media that demonized him for holding his original position are now demonizing him for changing that same position they demonized him for holding.  But when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton change their position on gay marriage (and yeah, they DID) they are praised for “evolving.”

Getting close to where I’m going here, two brothers – two BLACK brothers, mind you – with a profound history of felony convictions (one was actually wearing an ankle bracelet at the time of the deed) – murdered famous basketball player Dwayne Wade’s cousin in Chicago (a city with the tightest gun-control regulations in the nation).

Donald Trump came out and tweeted something to the effect that this was yet another proof that black people were being totally and tragically failed by Democrats who have owned these criminal roachhole cities for decades and promised good and delivered only EVIL decade after decade.  And he got slammed for it because he was “cynically exploiting a tragedy.”

It didn’t matter that HELL, AT LEAST DONALD TRUMP WAS TALKING ABOUT IT.  Barack Obama said NOTHING.  Hillary Clinton said NOTHING.  Because this was another of millions of black-on-black violence cases where these Democrat beasts couldn’t demonize white people and it happened in a city where they couldn’t demonize the 2nd Amendment.  And so like MILLIONS of other black-on-black violence situations, it just never happened.  Crickets are chirping except for demonizing Donald Trump for talking about it.

Didn’t matter that the murder of that mother of four young children occurred in the most heavily gun-regulated city in America.

Didn’t matter that Dwayne Wade had already “cynically exploited” the same tragedy by using his cousin’s death for his political agenda of even more failed gun control.  I guess it’s okay to cynically exploit the senseless death of a mother of four for your political ideology as long as you’re a family member.  Oh, wait, I mean as long as you’re a DEMOCRAT.  That’s how the mainstream media frames this a thousand times out of a thousand cases.

Gold Star Family members like hard-core Democrat Khan are honored and their integrity are beyond question; Gold Star Family members like Patricia Smith are slandered and demonized.

Again, bad people prefer lies.  And journalists and the institution that makes their propaganda possible are overwhelmingly Democrat, and that’s all you need to know to understand that they are on the side of the criminals against the decent as already documented above.

Let me patiently try to explain THE reason why that murder and so many other terrible, tragic, evil murders just like it occurred: because of DEMOCRATS and their vile policies.

Here’s the story:

Brothers arrested in slaying of Dwyane Wade’s cousin
Nykea Aldridge shot to death in Chicago
UPDATED 7:37 AM EDT Aug 29, 2016
Darwin Sorrells Jr., 26, and Derren Sorrells, 22, have each been charged with first-degree murder and first-degree attempted murder, police said Sunday. Darwin Sorrells has also been charged with a count of criminal trespass, a misdemeanor.
Both men are gang members who were on parole for gun convictions, Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie T. Johnson said Sunday at a news conference. They are both being held without bond, a source with knowledge of the case told CNN Sunday.
Aldridge was killed Friday afternoon when she was caught in the crossfire of a shooting while pushing her infant child in a stroller near Dulles School of Excellence on the city’s south side, police said. The child, about 3 weeks old, was not injured, family members said. […]
Suspects were on parole
Derren Sorrels had six felony convictions and was on parole for motor vehicle theft and escape from custody when the shooting happened, Johnson said. He wore an ankle bracelet but had taken it off during a period in which he was allowed to look for work, Deenihan said.
Darwin Sorrells was on parole for a gun charge. He had been sentenced to six years in January 2013 but was released early, Johnson said.

So the Democrat notion of “punishment” for a seven-time felon is a removable ankle-bracelet and Democrats deal with hard-core criminals with about as much harshness as they have dealt with what will likely be our Criminal-in-Chief Hillary Clinton whose treatment has destroyed any sense of legitimacy in our justice system.

I want you to explain to me how Democrats can look you in the eye and tell you that guns kill people but 22-year-old gangbangers who already have SIX felony convictions and was out on the damn street awaiting trial for his seventh don’t.

If it weren’t for Democrats, we would be putting these rabid vermin behind bars.  And better yet, we would be hanging them, shooting them, injecting rat poison into their veins, or whatever else you do to euthanize creatures that have no shred of humanity in them because they have so completely absorbed the worldview of the Democratic Party.

You look at the population groups that commit almost all the murders in America and then you look at the political party registration of those groups.  For example, if you consider Hispanics as non-white the way the government does in every other statistic other than crime, nonwhites are responsible for over 90 percent of the crimes in America.  That’s true both nationally and in any liberal city you want to name.  It’s amazing: whenever butthurt Hispanics want to decry their victimhood, their Hispanic being oppressed by whites.  But when they viciously murder or rape someone, well, gringo must have done it.  And if you have any questions about that, well, No habla.  And when you consider the percentage likelihood that young adults vote Democrat and compare it to the percentage of the most shockingly violent and despicable crimes there are, and it’s pretty much 99.9999999999999 percent of all violent crime being committed by Democrat party groups.

Democrats – you know, between their chants of “black lives matter!” are letting the most vile, violent, human roaches imaginable back out onto the streets over and over and over again.

Just as Democrats aren’t even bothering to deal with illegal immigrants or any other DEMOCRAT PARTY GROUP of parasites and leeches.  Illegal immigration costs America more than $113 billion a year.  While illegal immigrants comprise 3.5% of the U.S. population, this group is responsible for 36.7 percent of ALL federal criminal sentences.  And f.y.i. illegal immigration is NOT a federal crime being considered here; we’re talking about murder, drug trafficking, money laundering, kidnapping and hostage-taking, etc.  More than 820,000 people walking freely around the streets of America are illegal immigrants who are CONVICTED CRIMINALS.  And while the liberal mainstream media isn’t reporting that startling and terrifying avalanche of illegal immigrant criminality, it was a liberal think-tank that revealed the fact.

It should be absolutely no wonder that the father of the terrorist murderer who murdered fifty and left dozens with terrifying wounds is a lifelong DEMOCRAT who was invited and attended in a place of honor a Hillary Clinton rally; just as the terrorist murderer himself was a lifelong registered Democrat.  Like father, like son, like Democrat.

Oh, we live in a cockroach media climate the screams “black lives matter!” and pouring out totally bogus statistics and even bogus police brutality claims to back up their fake butthurt claim.  When this story that I tell you in advance will make you want to puke tells the real story of which race is victimizing which race.  And that story coming right on top of this one where a black thug stabbed and murdered two white nuns for the crime of trying to help the poorest people in America.  Take a look HERE to see the FACT of which race is predators preying upon which race:

black on white crime

This table can be used for a number of interesting calculations.  First, we find that during the 2012/2013 period, blacks committed an average of 560,600 violent crimes against whites, whereas whites committed only 99,403 such crimes against blacks.  This means blacks were the attackers in 84.9 percent of violent crimes involving blacks and whites.

Let’s get to the REAL cause of violence.  It is NOT guns.  It is DEMOCRATS.  It is the incredibly evil policies of Democrats to release and keep re-releasing predators onto society to prey on the innocent again and again and again and again and again.

Again, a 22-year-old man with SIX felony convictions and on probation awaiting trial for a seventh and he is free to murder in THE most gun-controlled city in America.  And if you are a Democrat, it’s not the fault of your party for voting for and installing judges who rule for predators to be free to do the most vile things imaginable; no, it’s guns that somehow float around and pull their own triggers and the Democrat-released monsters who happen to be holding those smoking guns are “victims” just like Cain whose brother Abel’s blood screamed to God from the ground was a “victim.”

This isn’t about “race”; it is about CULTURE.  And in the case of African-American culture, it is about an incredibly vile, out-of-control, vicious, hateful, bitter poisonous, toxic culture.

I have come to know a woman whose parents are Danish.  She is biologically as white as you can get.  But her parents were Danish missionaries to Paraguay.  And she was born in Paraguay and grew up with Paraguayan children and then married another missionary to Paraguay who had come from Argentina.  So, in other words, she grew up Hispanic.  So here’s the question: is she white because she’s biologically/racially Danish or is she  Hispanic because she was immersed in Hispanic culture and lives and thinks like a Hispanic?  And the answer is obvious: she is FAR more Hispanic than she is white.  She is far more comfortable with Hispanics than with whites now as a result of that acculturation.

Race isn’t the issue.  Culture is the issue.

Democrats reject that.  They fixate on race while they poison every single culture they come to indoctrinate with their garbage.  Republicans are creationists and believe that God created human beings in His own image, and that male and female created He them.  Democrats believe in evolution: they believe in the title of Darwin’s book: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.  That is a vile title for a vile worldview in which “favoured races” dominate the inferior races – or the politically incorrect races – in a struggle that they create and that they exploit as they pit the races against one another.

Democrats are also pathologically postmodernist and existentialist and fascist and reject the foundationalism that Republicans embrace that allows the belief in moral absolutes.  Instead, Democrats deny any actual, objective truth and create their own “truth.”  Which is to say they make up lies and then use those lies to create an ever larger web of lies that are shaping our culture in the most awful ways imaginable.

I’ve been talking about Democrats being murderers, and God in heaven will one day judge you as the murderers you are as you cower before His Great White Throne and explain why you murdered TEN TIMES more innocent human beings in the womb than the wicked Nazis murdered Jews in the Holocaust.  I have stated this before that I would literally rather die than vote Democrat and stand with you in that judgment accountable for the sixty million murders of innocent human beings that you will all stand guilty of as your votes created and sustained and continues that Holocaust.

Bringing it back to blacks, we find that 6 out of every 10 black lives that are snuffed out are snuffed out before that black life even escapes from his or her mother’s womb.  And Democrats will stand in judgment for that crime against black lives, too.

I would far prefer to be a roach than you on the last day, the coming Day of Judgment, Democrat.  And if you weren’t a completely wicked fool you would tremble for the ultimate eternal fate that awaits you as True, Ultimate Justice will one day finally and eternally prevail upon the earth.







Tags: , , , , , , , ,

15 Responses to “Does Fact That Democrats Let Out 22-Year-Old Monsters With 6 Felony Convictions Out On Street Have Anything To Do With Violence In Our Cities?”

  1. dog walker Says:

    Ugh. I kind of agree with you about the character of Democrats. I don’t figure Republicans for being a whole lot better though.
    Politics is getting weird. Remind me to tell you the story about getting assaulted for wearing a red t-shirt. People are wearing colors around here these days. Is that reminiscent of our old high school gang days? You ever go out in a red t-shirt?

    I had a sit down with my candidate for state house. She was pretty much interested in my perspective. The incumbent (R) is retiring. She (R) is hoping to pick up his spot. I think she has most of your philosophy. I don’t think she will win though. Around here you don’t put Republican on you mailers or posters. It is ok to say Democrat or put a big D. My candidate… I had to actually ask her and get her to say Republican.

    I think there is going to be a massive spike of non-citizen vote. I think it is going to be millions.
    Check this …
    The photo on that article shows a baby registering a baby to vote. I think it is a tongue in cheek suggestion on how to cheat. You can’t go after a teenage girl vor electoral malfeasance. That would make you real ugly

    Some years ago, Republicans send a guy to investigate multiple registrations at a one bedroom house occupied by and elderly lady. Investigator got sued for harassing or intimidating the old lady.

    The article includes verbiage that is like sample or practice for plausible deniability.

  2. dog walker Says:

    Back on topic… monsters.

  3. dog walker Says:

    heh, look for the place where it says shots fired.

  4. Michael Eden Says:

    dog walker,

    Well, I think we can agree on putting it this way: no matter how bad Republicans are, Democrats are reliably WORSE.

    For instance, Bloods wear red and Crips wear blue. And both come from THE most Democrat population in THE most heavily Democratic zip code in America. I’ll take Republican greed that we’re demonized for over gang monsters, thank you.

    Which side is violently breaking up which side’s rally’s??? The poop ALWAYS flows in ONE direction and every single time you have an episode of outright rabid fascism, it is ALWAYS the left.

    And it’s the same thing with criminal illegal anti-democratic “voting.” Democrats “vote” to cheat and steal elections and then rig the election system. It is simply a fact that illegal immigrants vote. For example, in California, thirteen percent of all illegal immigrants ADMIT they vote. How many more actually do?

    So we’re all bad. But one group of us is bad and then takes steroids to make their bad bigger, meaner, uglier and more fascist. And that group is called Democrats.

  5. dog walker Says:


  6. dog walker Says:

    I am voting for Hillary because I think her to be the best candidate to protect us from this

  7. Michael Eden Says:

    dog walker:

    Well, yeah. A vote for Hillary is a vote for twenty times the illegal immigrants and a hundred times more recruits for MS-13.

    These gangs are undocumented people. They deserve rights. Hillary guarantees the right of abortion and the right to murder. These poor undocumented people need their rights protected as they murder.

    More Hillary = more mayhem. And who doesn’t want mayhem???

  8. dog walker Says:

    But most of them are nice. Shouldn’t we let them all in?
    Borders, aren’t they a throwback to a time when we were less evolved?

    (I went to a city council meeting a good while ago. A councilor there said she didn’t believe in borders.)

  9. dog walker Says:

    Today’s realization. I hate Democrats more than I love the little Angelman. I think about going to see the little guy but I have to go deep into blue shirt territory and I just haven’t got the stomach for it.

    Blue shirts own that holiness?

    What say you Christian man? Ah, nevermind. I think you already said it.

  10. dog walker Says:

    Let me count the ways.

  11. Michael Eden Says:

    dog walker,

    On your “borders” comment/question a question of my own:

    How do you refute a moral relativist who doesn’t believe in right and wrong and uses all these ridiculous arguments to say we should abide lawless behavior? Steal his stuff and watch how he or she reacts.

    That councilor who doesn’t believe in borders locks her doors at night, I’ll bet you anything. That’s because she loves herself and her own stuff whereas she doesn’t value anyone else’s life or their property or America itself whatsoever. That’s what it boils down to.

  12. Michael Eden Says:

    ANY private school – I repeat ANY private school – has the RIGHT and even the DUTY to “discriminate” in the sense of targeting and selecting the type of students that suit it’s philosophy and purpose.

    There are ALL KINDS of secular private schools that do the exact same thing, down to refusing to accept children with serious emotional disabilities that would negatively impact the rest of the students.

    As for the “discriminating” against “other faiths”??? I think of the numerous “black ONLY” universities that are so hard-core leftist/liberal that it is beyond UNREAL. I think of the purging of Christians and conservatives from the media and from Hollywood and from journalism. The damn DAY that these very same people who are so shrill about it GO TO PRISON for discriminating against Christians – just consider the vicious bias and discrimination of Christians – in the news media and in academia, well, that would be really, really refreshing.

    I was truly amazed at the following column because I am quite familiar with the author as a hard-core liberal, but read this and from the New York Times no less:

    A Confession of Liberal Intolerance
    Nicholas Kristof MAY 7, 2016

    WE progressives believe in diversity, and we want women, blacks, Latinos, gays and Muslims at the table — er, so long as they aren’t conservatives.

    Universities are the bedrock of progressive values, but the one kind of diversity that universities disregard is ideological and religious. We’re fine with people who don’t look like us, as long as they think like us.

    O.K., that’s a little harsh. But consider George Yancey, a sociologist who is black and evangelical.

    “Outside of academia I faced more problems as a black,” he told me. “But inside academia I face more problems as a Christian, and it is not even close.”

    I’ve been thinking about this because on Facebook recently I wondered aloud whether universities stigmatize conservatives and undermine intellectual diversity. The scornful reaction from my fellow liberals proved the point.

    “Much of the ‘conservative’ worldview consists of ideas that are known empirically to be false,” said Carmi.

    “The truth has a liberal slant,” wrote Michelle.

    “Why stop there?” asked Steven. “How about we make faculties more diverse by hiring idiots?”

    To me, the conversation illuminated primarily liberal arrogance — the implication that conservatives don’t have anything significant to add to the discussion. My Facebook followers have incredible compassion for war victims in South Sudan, for kids who have been trafficked, even for abused chickens, but no obvious empathy for conservative scholars facing discrimination.

    The stakes involve not just fairness to conservatives or evangelical Christians, not just whether progressives will be true to their own values, not just the benefits that come from diversity (and diversity of thought is arguably among the most important kinds), but also the quality of education itself. When perspectives are unrepresented in discussions, when some kinds of thinkers aren’t at the table, classrooms become echo chambers rather than sounding boards — and we all lose.

    Four studies found that the proportion of professors in the humanities who are Republicans ranges between 6 and 11 percent, and in the social sciences between 7 and 9 percent.

    Conservatives can be spotted in the sciences and in economics, but they are virtually an endangered species in fields like anthropology, sociology, history and literature. One study found that only 2 percent of English professors are Republicans (although a large share are independents).

    In contrast, some 18 percent of social scientists say they are Marxist. So it’s easier to find a Marxist in some disciplines than a Republican.

    The scarcity of conservatives seems driven in part by discrimination. One peer-reviewed study found that one-third of social psychologists admitted that if choosing between two equally qualified job candidates, they would be inclined to discriminate against the more conservative candidate.

    Yancey, the black sociologist, who now teaches at the University of North Texas, conducted a survey in which up to 30 percent of academics said that they would be less likely to support a job seeker if they knew that the person was a Republican.

    The discrimination becomes worse if the applicant is an evangelical Christian. According to Yancey’s study, 59 percent of anthropologists and 53 percent of English professors would be less likely to hire someone they found out was an evangelical.

    “Of course there are biases against evangelicals on campuses,” notes Jonathan L. Walton, the Plummer Professor of Christian Morals at Harvard. Walton, a black evangelical, adds that the condescension toward evangelicals echoes the patronizing attitude toward racial minorities: “The same arguments I hear people make about evangelicals sound so familiar to the ways people often describe folk of color, i.e. politically unsophisticated, lacking education, angry, bitter, emotional, poor.”

    A study published in The American Journal of Political Science underscored how powerful political bias can be. In an experiment, Democrats and Republicans were asked to choose a scholarship winner from among (fictitious) finalists, with the experiment tweaked so that applicants sometimes included the president of the Democratic or Republican club, while varying the credentials and race of each. Four-fifths of Democrats and Republicans alike chose a student of their own party to win a scholarship, and discrimination against people of the other party was much greater than discrimination based on race.

    “I am the equivalent of someone who was gay in Mississippi in 1950,” a conservative professor is quoted as saying in “Passing on the Right,” a new book about right-wing faculty members by Jon A. Shields and Joshua M. Dunn Sr. That’s a metaphor that conservative scholars often use, with talk of remaining in the closet early in one’s career and then “coming out” after receiving tenure.

    This bias on campuses creates liberal privilege. A friend is studying for the Law School Admission Test, and the test preparation company she is using offers test-takers a tip: Reading comprehension questions will typically have a liberal slant and a liberal answer.

    Some liberals think that right-wingers self-select away from academic paths in part because they are money-grubbers who prefer more lucrative professions. But that doesn’t explain why there are conservative math professors but not many right-wing anthropologists.

    It’s also liberal poppycock that there aren’t smart conservatives or evangelicals. Richard Posner is a more-or-less conservative who is the most cited legal scholar of all time. With her experience and intellect, Condoleezza Rice would enhance any political science department. Francis Collins is an evangelical Christian and famed geneticist who has led the Human Genome Project and the National Institutes of Health. And if you’re saying that conservatives may be tolerable, but evangelical Christians aren’t — well, are you really saying you would have discriminated against the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.?

    Jonathan Haidt, a centrist social psychologist at New York University, cites data suggesting that the share of conservatives in academia has plunged, and he has started a website, Heterodox Academy, to champion ideological diversity on campuses.

    “Universities are unlike other institutions in that they absolutely require that people challenge each other so that the truth can emerge from limited, biased, flawed individuals,” he says. “If they lose intellectual diversity, or if they develop norms of ‘safety’ that trump challenge, they die. And this is what has been happening since the 1990s.”

    Should universities offer affirmative action for conservatives and evangelicals? I don’t think so, partly because surveys find that conservative scholars themselves oppose the idea. But it’s important to have a frank discussion on campuses about ideological diversity. To me, this seems a liberal blind spot.

    Universities should be a hubbub of the full range of political perspectives from A to Z, not just from V to Z. So maybe we progressives could take a brief break from attacking the other side and more broadly incorporate values that we supposedly cherish — like diversity — in our own dominions.

    I can document studies and polls and surveys up the whazoo documenting vicious bias against Christian conservatives in academia. And for the record, I MYSELF am an example. I have all the qualifications, but there is NO WAY I would EVER get hired outside of a Christian – and by “Christian” I mean EVANGELICAL Christian that actually ACCEPTS and TEACHES Christianity and the Christian worldview to its students – university.

    So I always just laugh my fool head off when I hear a liberal talk about “intolerance” when they are not looking in a damn mirror and talking to themselves…

    The amazing thing is that, as an evangelical Christian, I have a theology that teaches me that I because of my commitment to the Word of God have unique access to “the Truth.” And therefore the kind of “tolerance” the left embraces isn’t even one of my values. It IS their most cherished and most CENTRAL value – but being hypocrites these people who got their foot in the door claiming to be so damn “open-minded” are in fact THE most closed-minded people of all in the models of Hitler and Stalin.

  13. Michael Eden Says:

    dog walker,

    I can honestly say that I know EXACTLY how you feel.

    I am outspoken and I have a clear, projecting voice. So when I talk to anybody I always end up becoming the caricature in those old “E.F. Hutton” ads, where you mention that name (“all I know is that E.F. Hutton says…”) and suddenly everybody around you is quiet, leaning in and listening intently to what you’re saying. Only it’s me talking about my faith or Judeo-Christian worldview or my conservative politics. And that’s the way to become the Super Hero a.k.a. “Pariah Man.” And I sure don’t care on a personal level, but it has often come back to bite me hard in the butt on a professional level.

    But in the end I’d always rather be true to myself and to what I stand for because My God stands behind me and ultimately is preparing me for something far, far better than this world.

  14. dog walker Says:

    I am going to retract that remark about not going to see the Angelman and my other little pals. I need those guys.
    I am thinking about wearing a red shirt though.

  15. dog walker Says:

    E.F. Hutton voice. Yes, I can envision that. I think your essay style has an E.F. Hutton voice. Your blogging is good but in particular I like your essays. I think that writing gives us that sort of clarity.

    E.F. Hutton voice, I kind of equate that with Shakespearean. Why am I thinking about that tangent?

    Some years ago when I was going to church I encountered a guy that had what I defined a Shakespearean vocal presentation. See back in those days they didn’t have amplifiers so the actors had to really be able to project and still preserve subtlety and emotion.

    The guy I am thinking of was a Bible memorizer. He had memorized several books of the bible and he would travel to churches and present. It wasn’t just a recitation. It was a presentation. Shakespearean and this guy was the image you reminded me of with that E.F. Hutton simile.

    I was so impressed with the guy’s performance that it turned out to be the most I ever paid for a performance. I don’t remember exactly but I know I gave him several hundred dollars.

    What I think about now is that this guy had fully and completely immersed himself in the language of the Bible. I think about the “language” I think in and then I compare and contrast with the “language” that I know that guy thinks in, is immersed in.

    Man o man!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: