Here’s a picture that Democrats don’t like looking at:
If you take a look at that picture it shows a great big giant problem for the Democratic Party that they need to deal with.
It’s a map that shows that only incredibly crowded cities vote Democrat, with the rest of America where people are allowed to breathe freedom overwhelmingly vote Republican.
If you live in a rural environment, you have this strange tendency to not think that the government is your provider and your master and you don’t want it to be your god. The power of government is not all around you and above you and below you. And you don’t want it to be.
If, on the other hand, you live in a giant city, crammed in like sardines, well, you pretty much can’t live without government. You can’t own a gun so you are clearly helpless and depend totally and utterly for the police; you can’t travel around so you clearly must rely on public transportation. You need government assistance in the roach-motel-pill-boxes a.k.a. apartments because somebody has to pay for all the sky-high taxes and cost of complying with tens of thousands of regulations – and so when the rich people who own the apartment buildings get hikes, guess what happens to the rent? Yep, it goes up; so we need government to impose public housing requirements and provide subsidies for rent. The entire cost of living in these giant cities is sky high, in fact. Because Government thy god is a hungry god, an all-consuming fire.
People in the rural area have a “live free or die” mentality; people in densely packed urban cities haven’t had a free thought in generations. They are like goldfish crammed into a Wal-Mart fishbowl, staring at nothing with their empty fish eyes. They are so dehumanized that they are capable of killing their own children in the abortion mills without ever once having a single twinge of conscience. They have already murdered sixty million babies in America: a Holocaust that makes them TEN TIMES more wicked than the Nazis.
In a liberal Democrat-controlled city, there is no place to go to be alone, to think your own thoughts – and that is a good thing too, as far as the left is concerned – because if you were able to be alone and think your own thoughts you might begin to start thinking thoughts of escape, thoughts of freedom. And they cannot have that. They WILL not have it.
You will think what you are told to think by your betters. They will pump your thoughts into your head via the media culture that they control.
Now, no one who has truly enjoyed actual life in a rural environment would ever willingly place himself or herself in such a hellhole. But that’s okay, because “Democrats” are “DEMOnic bureauCRATS” who believe in using the raw, naked power of Government to force people to comply.
That’s the problem the Democrats face. What’s their solution?
Well, they need SOME kind of ruse, some kind of bait-and-switch. There’s a saying that you can fool all Republicans some of the time, and all Democrats all of the time, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.
So enter “climate change.” Enter the Democrat Party’s “Final Solution” to put us all in their Auschwitz cities where they can have complete and total and absolute control over each and every one of us:
What does California need to meet its climate-change goals? For starters, denser housing and less driving, report says
March 27, 2017California will need billions of dollars in new funding for housing and transportation improvements, and to make extraordinary changes to state and local government policies, in order to meet its new 2030 climate change goals, according to new reports from state and regional government officials and UC Berkeley researchers.Californians will need to cut their driving by 1.6 miles per day, which they could accomplish through telecommuting, carpooling, biking or taking transit to work once a month as well as replacing short car trips with walking and combining multiple errands into one trip, state climate regulators said.Car and truck pollution makes up the largest portion of California’s carbon emissions, and residents will need to drive less to reach the state’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. These driving reduction numbers also assume that the state will substantially boost the number of electric cars on the road and cut carbon from fuel.To get there, representatives from the Southern California Assn. of Governments and other regional agencies told climate regulators at a meeting last week that they needed a lot of new money for transportation and housing — as much as $5 billion in the Sacramento region alone — as well as policy changes that could include tolls and other charges for people to drive in congested areas.Since 2008, regional governments have been responsible for developing plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by aiming to redirect development from sprawling outward to denser development into cities, adjacent suburbs and neighborhoods near mass transit lines. But regional governments have to revise their plans to meet the new targets now that the 2030 climate change goals passed the Legislature last year.Beyond funding, state officials need to be sensitive to how Californians are used to getting around every day, said Hasan Ikhrata, the executive director of the Southern California Assn. of Governments, which is responsible for implementing a climate change blueprint in Los Angeles, Imperial, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura counties.“We have changed the discussion in the state of California in a good way about how to sustain the future,” Ikhrata said at the meeting. “But at the same time we still have 40 million Californians that need to get from A to B. And we can’t overnight think they’re all going to bike or use transit. Some of them will drive.”Rather than expecting all Californians to drive less, the state could see substantial driving reductions if it changed policies to funnel new housing into cities, according to a study released Monday by public policy think tank Next 10.The study, written by UC Berkeley environmental and housing researchers Ethan Elkind, Carol Galante and Nathaniel Decker, compared the effects of concentrating all future housing growth into areas that have already been developed with a scenario where only 60% of new homes were built in those locations, which is what happened from 2000 to 2015.The study found that residents living in already developed neighborhoods would drive about 18 fewer miles every weekday than those living outside those communities.
They won’t force EVERYONE to change, understand. “Some of them will drive.” You know, like the elite liberal class of commissars, the politically connected, the leftist celebrities who will be able to continue to live out on our television screens their dramas of the rich and shameless. Oops, I mean famous. Life won’t change for them. They will continue to live their luxurious, separate, life=atop-Olympus lifestyles. It will be all the rest of us jammed into rat warrens.
And these people aren’t stupid: they know it will have the very intentional benefit of “fundamentally transforming” the way we think once we’re jammed into the dense cities that they have far more control over.
And this “final solution: is REALLY something the left wants to impose, because oh yes, they’re talking about doing this a LOT:
California won’t meet its climate change goals without a lot more housing density in its cities
March 6, 2017
Liam DillonTo meet the bold new climate change goals put in place last year, California will work to put millions of electric cars on the road, revolutionize its dairy industry and generate half of all power from solar panels and other renewable sources.But those efforts will come up short, warn state regulators, without dramatic changes to how Californians live and travel.
The state has pledged to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. To do so, Southern Californians will have to drive nearly 12% less by that date than they did five years ago, cutting their miles on the road every day from 22.8 to 20.2, according a Los Angeles Times estimate based on data from state and regional climate and planning officials.
These driving reductions mean that Californians will have to walk, bike and use mass transit much more frequently than they do now. By 2030, residents will have to travel by foot four times more frequently than they did in 2012, alongside a nine-fold increase in bicycling over the same time, and a substantial boost in bus and rail ridership, climate officials say.Getting people out of their cars in favor of walking, cycling or riding mass transit will require the development of new, closely packed housing near jobs and commercial centers at a rate not seen in the United States since at least before World War II, according to a recent study by permit and contractor data analysis website BuildZoom.“You can’t be pro-environment and anti-housing,” said Marlon Boarnet, chair of the Department of Urban Planning and Spatial Analysis at USC’s Price School of Public Policy, who has advised state climate regulators on land-use issues. “You can’t be anti-sprawl and anti-housing. This is something that has not been very well understood.”
The article ends by quoting a university professor who says this:
“To be blunt, the state’s going to have to take some leadership,” Boarnet said. “We’ve tried very strong municipal control, and in the case of Los Angeles, strong neighborhood control. And we’ve found that that doesn’t let us build the housing that we need in the locations that we need it.
Nothing like the raw power of naked government force. Oh, unless Donald Trump seeks to curb lawlessness by requiring cities and states to end their “sanctuary city” rabid violation of federal law by withholding federal funds. Liberals who LOVE government force call that “gun-to-the-head tactics.” Liberals actually LOVE gun-to-the-head tactics. Democrats LOVE imposing regulations that hold guns to the heads of people who don’t want anything to do with their agenda but are forced to by the raw, naked power of thugocracy. They just scream like rabid wolves when they’re not the ones who get to hold the gun, is all.
Liberal intellectuals know that people who are allowed the basic freedom to live where they want to live will also have the basic freedom to think for themselves. And anyone who looks at a political election map knows that such people vote REPUBLICAN and oppose these fascists’ agenda
But how do you sell such a load of crap? By conflating it with a different load of crap, of course: the crap of the theory that humans are somehow solely responsible for climate change that was occurring billions of years before there were ever any humans on the planet and which scientists are actually measuring as we speak on other planets in our solar system.
Al Gore and the Democratic Party propaganda machine assured us we’d be underwater by now. Strange, too, because I currently have neither gills nor a snorkel and yet I’m doing okay.
You want to end climate change on Jupiter? Pack humans on earth into liberal utopias. Isn’t the solution obvious???
It doesn’t matter that actual climate change has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with humans. Because “climate change” is just a “final solution” to a different problem: the problem of human dignity and human freedom which keeps liberals from attaining their goal of total domination.
If you have an intelligence quotient above that of a grapefruit, you understand that “climate change” and “sanctuary city policies” have one thing in common: they are the result of incredibly cynical and profoundly dishonest Democrat Party ideology. Because understand, if the immigrants pouring into America voted Republican, Democrats would be screaming that they be hunted down like BUGS. But illegal immigrants ultimately end up voting Democrat and so they are like the sacred cows in India while the people around them starve. Which is because the law of supply and demand can be a cruel thing when Democrats intentionally impose a giant increase in the supply of unskilled labor and are surprised that lo-and-behold wages tank because the supply of low skilled workers far exceeds the demand. With the result being increased poverty. Especially of the most vulnerable populations such as blacks. Again, these aren’t stupid people: they know damn well what they’re doing. They have a plan and they are working toward imposing that plan. And their plan depends on poverty and ignorance.
Democrats turned black people into a sacred cow to advance their political agenda in the past. But now they are more than willing to slaughter that sacred cow because there is another cow with more milk and more meat: Hispanics. And it doesn’t bother these soulless social-engineers at all to sacrifice one sacred cow for one that will carry them forward into a blatantly anti-American America.
So let’s look at the new Democrat Party sacred cow and see how much ugly, vicious harm they are doing to the very heart of the Democratic bastions, the big cities.
Data from each of the DEA’s 20 domestic divisions shows that of the 767 fugitives with known birthplaces, eighty-three percent of them were born outside of this country. In effect the US has imported a foreign criminal class that operates a multi-billion dollar drug trade within our borders. In the U.S.’s most violent cities, foreign-born fugitives dominate lists of the most-wanted criminals. In one example, in Detroit, only 7 percent of the DEA’s fugitives were born in America. In some DEA divisions, such as those for Dallas, Seattle, Philadelphia, New Jersey and New York, most-wanted lists contain not a single U.S.-born person.
You find out that Mexicans ALONE out of all the Hispanics pouring into our nation make up 14% of our entire U.S. prison population – far, FAR out of any proportion to their actual numbers as a percentage of Americans.
Then consider how many damn pardons Obama gave to hard-core drug dealers who were foreign born. Don’t tell me this isn’t intentional.
And under Obama we had a giant nuclear EXPLOSION of drug addiction and deaths by overdosing.
And that’s because it is simply impossible for any reasoning person not to conclude that Democrats WANT a predator class preying on people in big cities. Because Democrats want people naked and afraid and dependent. On THEM. It’s like the gangs that I’ll talk about more at the end of this article: gangs come in and vandalize and rob, and then what do they do? They offer to sell the businesses they prey upon “protection.” And of course it’s protection from THEM. The people who live in big cities are poor and ignorant and stupid – and that’s EXACTLY how Democrats want them. And they feed them drugs to keep them poor and ignorant and stupid. Because only truly evil or truly stupid people will vote for this party of evil and depravity and failure.
And it is no different with “climate change” in that it is nothing but a profoundly cynical attempt to impose self-serving Democrat-Party political social-engineering into “scientific necessity.” Even though all legitimate science proves that temperatures in our past were FAR higher than they are today and that we have had fairly regular swings in climate that continue into our current time. The Old Egyptian Kingdom and the Mayan civilization were ended by “climate change.” Even though there wasn’t a single SUV or a single Republican politician or voter in those days. And the same damn climate change that is part of our past before humans had any damn thing to do with our damn climate is all around us in the planetary bodies around us.
Have you ever heard of the Azusa Revival? Fascinating story. It was the story of the triumph of Christian faith and the miraculous results of Christian faith.
But ultimately Democrats took over Los Angeles. And so today in that same location we have Skid Row. And we’ve had Skid Row since the damn Democrats took over Los Angeles.
Christians are still there, like the Union Rescue Mission (where my friend Warren Currie used to serve as the chief executive officer) doing their best to help in the desperate poverty that ALWAYS results in the dense urban cities that are the dream of liberal Democrats.
It’s an amazing thing that there are many cities where the Democrat Party political machine took over a CENTURY ago and things are worse as a result than EVER. But the Democrat Party political machine – just like the sucking ticks that these vermin are – once embedded are impossible to remove. Because where there are cities, there is poverty, and where there is poverty, there is ignorance. And where there is ignorance, rest assured there are DEMOCRATS.
The Bible talks about principalities and powers – demons and demonic strongholds. Consider a gang (another guaranteed result of the Democratic Party platform). It has a territory. And the gang owns its territory. You can feel the oppression – literally the spiritual oppression – in an area where a gang holds people down through fear.
Which party is doing everything they can to prevent the police from doing their job to serve and protect the American people? The DEMOCRATIC Party. In California they literally opened up the prisons and declared crimes not to be crimes while they have “sanctuary cities” and in the meantime Obama’s Department of Injustice rabidly investigated every police department they could as if it is the POLICE who are the real criminals and not the criminals who prey on people.
That is EXACTLY what Democrats are trying to create: larger, more powerful demonic strongholds. Where they have total control, where they can oppress people and keep people down – literally down for a hundred years – through their lies within a system that resembles a fiefdom whereby the serfs are owned by the lords and receive just enough to live on while the rich continue to get richer.
The other night I was watching a liberal movie star decrying the fact that “police officers ought to be able to live in the communities they protect.” Sounds nice, I suppose, unless you have a functioning brain cell. Shouldn’t garbage collectors be able to live in the community they serve? What about that fool movie star’s community? Shouldn’t they be able to live in that multi-million dollar Bel-Air mansion of yours??? These leftist movie stars don’t have any intention of living in some tiny apartment surrounded by poverty and drugs and crime and gangs and risking their lives just to venture outside where they have to take the damn bus because they can’t possibly afford a car that would let them drive away to freedom. That’s not for them. No, that’s for YOU.
And just like their god Lucifer always does, Democrats have to package their lies from hell with something else that they can convince people to swallow. Like “science” or like “tolerance.” They intentionally and invariably deliberately conflate “illegal immigrants” with “immigrants” because they literally don’t want people to comprehend the difference and distinction so they can get them to swallow their lies. Democrats are lying liars who lie and if their lips are moving or if they’re typing something it means they’re lying. They intentionally and invariably conflate “climate change” with human causation in spite of the obvious history of planet earth and in spite of what is obviously going on in the universe all around us so they can fearmonger and demagogue people into complying with their self-serving agenda. The left demands the United Nations receive – get this – $76 TRILLION to combat climate change. So they can “change” the climate by like half a degree? No. You might be that stupid, but these people aren’t. Rather, they have an agenda that comes right out of the heart of their god, the devil.
The crap that California liberals are peddling is INSANE. Unless they can get their hands on that kind of money. You give liberals that kind of money and you’ll get the Final Solution.
If you’re a Democrat, please have the moral consistency to invite at least one hundred illegal immigrants to live in your house with you and please feed them and take care of all of their medical needs. Because that is the dream of the party that you rabidly support: the dream of cramming people together into dense “communities” and forcing someone to take care of all of those people.
Not that there has been a Democrat in fifty years who wasn’t a pathological hypocrite.