Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon

What do you call using our nation’s national intelligence services charged with identifying terrorists before they can viciously murder Americans as an internal weapon against private US citizens for naked political purposes?

Keep in mind, Obama has already done it once, against hundreds of tea party organizations legitimately seeking their 501c3 status and being illegally delayed and even audited only to find out that Obama had weaponized the IRS into his own Internal Revenge Service.

This is THE worst, THE most corrupt, THE most evil, behavior EVER exhibited by an American president.

If you’re a liberal, just imagine Donald Trump exploiting our intelligence services, the NSA etc., to spy on you and publicly disgrace you.

This is nakedly in-American and anti-American.

Honk if you think an American president ought to be allowed to get away with this kind of criminal fascism.

Because what happened was not only a crime but a felony for damn good reason on multiple fronts.

This is Big Brother at his very most evil.  And Big Brother needs to go to prison and have the cell door slammed hard in his face.

It is now a proven fact that Barack Obama’s thug regime did just this very thing in the waning days of his life inside the Führerbunker.

Kimberley Strassel of the Wall Street Journal put this piece out yesterday that not only establishes the blatant criminality of the Obama administration, but in the complicit pathological fascism of the Democratic Party machine (I will be boldfacing the criminality of Obama and leave the rest for you to read):

What Devin Nunes Knows
Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration
By KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL
March 30, 2017 6:53 p.m. ET
California Rep. Adam Schiff may not offer much by way of substance, but give him marks for political flimflam. The ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee was so successful at ginning up fake outrage over his Republican counterpart that he successfully buried this week’s only real (and bombshell) news.
Mr. Schiff and fellow Democrats spent this week accusing Chairman Devin Nunes of carrying water for President Trump, undermining the committee’s Russia investigation, and hiding information. The press dutifully regurgitated the outrage, as well as Mr. Schiff’s calls for Mr. Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation into possible Russian electoral meddling.
All this engineered drama served to deep-six the important information Americans urgently deserve to know. Mr. Nunes has said he has seen proof that the Obama White House surveilled the incoming administration—on subjects that had nothing to do with Russia—and that it further unmasked (identified by name) transition officials. This goes far beyond a mere scandal. It’s a potential crime.
We’ve known since early February that a call by former national security adviser Mike Flynn to the Russian ambassador was monitored by U.S. intelligence. There’s nothing improper in tapping foreign officials. But it was improper that Mr. Flynn’s name was revealed and leaked to the press, along with the substance of his conversation. The media nonetheless excused all this by claiming one piece of Mr. Flynn’s conversation (sanctions) was relevant to the continuing investigation into Trump-Russia ties.
Around the same time, Mr. Nunes’s own intelligence sources informed him that documents showed further collection of information about, and unmasking of, Trump transition officials. These documents aren’t easily obtainable, since they aren’t the “finished” intelligence products that Congress gets to see. Nonetheless, for weeks Mr. Nunes has been demanding intelligence agencies turn over said documents—with no luck, so far.
Mr. Nunes earlier this week got his own source to show him a treasure trove of documents at a secure facility. Here are the relevant details:
First, there were dozens of documents with information about Trump officials. Second, the information these documents contained was not related to Russia. Third, while many reports did “mask” identities (referring, for instance, to “U.S. Person 1 or 2”) they were written in ways that made clear which Trump officials were being discussed. Fourth, in at least one instance, a Trump official other than Mr. Flynn was outright unmasked. Finally, these documents were circulated at the highest levels of government.
To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration.
Mr. Schiff’s howls about Mr. Nunes’s methods are bluster; the Republican was doing his job, and well. Mr. Nunes has spent years cultivating whistleblowers and sources as part of his oversight responsibilities, and that network scored him information that has otherwise remained hidden. It isn’t clear if the White House itself attempted to obtain these documents, but even if it did, the Senate has confirmed few Trump political appointees, which means there aren’t many loyal staffers among the Obama holdovers to attempt it. It’s also possible the Trump White House was wary of making such a demand, since it would inevitably leak. The last thing the administration wants is wild speculation that it was interfering with the FBI’s Russia probe.
Meantime, few things match the ludicrous furor over Mr. Nunes’s source-meeting place, or his visit to brief Mr. Trump. Congress members must view most classified material on executive-branch grounds, since that’s the only way to access it physically. Having discovered the former administration’s surveillance of Trump officials, Mr. Nunes had a duty to let the White House know. (Imagine if he’d sat on it.) He could hardly let Democrats know first, since their only interest these days is in leaking and twisting stories. And the reason he held press briefings before and after his meeting with Mr. Trump was to be transparent about his purpose.
Hint to the press corps: If Mr. Nunes wanted to tip off the White House about his Russia probe, it’d be a lot easier to speed-dial Steve Bannon secretly from his office.
If Mr. Schiff wants to be trusted with important information, he might start by proving he is trustworthy—rather than rumor-mongering that there is “more than circumstantial evidence” of Trump-Russia collusion. He might voice some concern that a prior White House was monitoring its political opponents. He might ask whether Obama officials had been “reverse monitoring”—tracking foreign officials solely so they could spy on the Trump team.
Mr. Nunes has zero reason to recuse himself from this probe, because he is doing his job. It’s Mr. Schiff who ought to be considering recusal, for failing to do his own.

At this point, WE ACTUALLY HAVE ADMISSIONS OF GUILT FROM A TOP OBAMA OFFICIAL THAT SHE IN FACT COMMITTED A FELONY AND LEAKED CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF ATTACKING THE INCOMING ADMINISTRATION.

Evelyn Farkas, Obama’s deputy assistant secretary of defense, openly admitted that she participated in a giant conspiracy to treasonously undermine the administration of the next president of the United States:

Highlights of her criminal admission:

I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.

Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more.  We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to [Democrat politicians].

We now know this for a fact:

With the help of MSNBC, simultaneous to her admission of first-hand specific knowledge of the administration spying on Mr. Trump, Ms. Evelyn Farkas outs herself as the key source for a New York Times report which discussed President Obama officials leaking classified information to media.

Considerable irony jumps to the forefront when you recognize, the New York Times tried to protect Evelyn Farkas as the source of their reporting by stating:

“More than a half-dozen current and former officials described various aspects of the effort to preserve and distribute the intelligence, and some said they were speaking to draw attention to the material and ensure proper investigation by Congress. All spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were discussing classified information, nearly all of which remains secret.” (link)

Personally, I don’t understand why life in prison at hard manual labor until she tells us what bigger fish instructed her to do this is not entirely reasonable.  It is a crime against our very way of life for an intelligence official with access to our deepest and most classified information on American citizens to provide that information to a political party for political purposes out of political motivation.  And that is EXACTLY what the Obama administration did.

We have an open acknowledgement that Obama officials were intentionally compiling top secret classified information on Trump officials at a time when they were private American citizens and that that information was illegally not only unmasked but in fact deliberately spread for political purposes.

Which ought to amount to a sentence of death by firing squad with 300 million rifle barrels firing skull-shattering death at the same time.

This woman needs to go down harder than Osama bin Laden went down.  Because she is a FAR greater threat to our way of life than bin Laden ever was.

And people either need to go to prison and do very hard and very long time or we just need to have complete anarchy.  Because millions of us would rather die fighting with our last breath than live under the Democratic Party’s very clearly Stalinist option.

Democrats – i.e. DEMOnic bureaCRATS – did this and they are now screaming about Nunes’ procedure for revealing their rabid treason to cover up their crimes against democracy and any form of open society itself.

For the factual record, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT DONALD TRUMP OR ANY MEMBER OF HIS CAMPAIGN TEAM IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM COLLABORATED WITH RUSSIA OR PARTICIPATED IN ANY ACTIVITY WITH RUSSIA.  That has been repeatedly admitted by Obama’s TOP intelligence officials.

On “Meet the Press” on March 5, host Chuck Todd asked Clapper, “Does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian officials?”

Citing a report compiled by the “NSA, FBI and CIA, with my office, the Director of National Intelligence,” Clapper answered, “There was no evidence of that included in our report.”

Did any such evidence exist, asked Todd?

“Not to my knowledge,” replied Clapper.

On March 16, Hillary Clinton supporter and severe Trump critic Michael Morell, the former acting CIA director under Obama, said, “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all.”

“And there’s a lot of people looking for it,” he added.

Morrell also cited “a pretty strong statement by General Clapper.”

So what was in the intelligence information that Farkas sought to spread far and wide?

So we have Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper AND we have Obama’s CIA Director Michael Morrell both stating that there is nothing whatsoever about the naked political allegation that Trump colluded/conspired with Russia to steal the election.  Period.

There is NO evidence that the same thing was done to Hillary Clinton or to her top campaign officials. In spite of the fact that Russia had her illegal secret server because of HER criminality and in spite of the fact that the FBI wanted to look at the DNC servers to see if there was any foreign activity going on and the Democratic Party refused to allow them.

Which proves that the real reason the Obama administration was feverishly collecting and sharing the classified information was not for national security purposes, but for nakedly POLITICAL reasons having nothing to do with anything other than Democrats being nothing but rancid, rotten, toxic piles of demonized slime.
So you have Russia, but what you REALLY have is American election hacking under Obama.  Which for the record it is a FACT that Obama actually DID to our ally Israel when Obama tried to get Benjamin Netanyahu voted out and used US taxpayer money to try to do it.
And now the screaming rabid Democrat traitors to America are trying to manufacture Nunes into some kind of scapegoat to cover up their crimes.

We need right now today to either disband our intelligence services ENTIRELY, disband our military, disband our police forces, open up the gun stores and just allow total nihilism to take its rightful place in this nation, or we need to start putting Obama officials by the hundreds in jail until we get to the bottom of this fascist weaponization of intelligence organizations that we depend upon not to take us down the road to Stalinism.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Confirmed: Fascist, Felonious Obama Administration Spied On Private American Citizens And Used US Intelligence Services As Political Weapon”

  1. dog walker Says:

  2. dog walker Says:

    All of the news has been about the supposed “mountain of evidence” of Russia’s interference in our election on Trump’s behalf. Now watch as they spin the vindication into yet another scandal. That is exactly what is happening when the media supposes that Nunes is “leaking” information to the president.
    Why would anybody believe that it is not the President’s prerogative to view any information gathered by any government agent or agency? If he was the accused wouldn’t said information be the stuff of “discovery?”

    But this all shakes out to who controls the most “ink” or the most screens. Vindication or not, those who want to believe that there is a mountain of evidence will only watch the shows that spin the way they want it spun.

    Meanwhile “there is absolutely no evidence” that any non citizen voted in the election. It is totally unsubstantiated.

  3. dog walker Says:

    Oh, I got it wrong. It ain’t that Nunes is leaking information to the President. According to the news now, documents exist that have been carefully cataloged and numbered as evidence, you know, the mountain of evidence. But those documents are expected to disappear into the white house by way of Nunes. (as if documents don’t exist in multiple copies.) So it ain’t that he is leaking it is that he is facilitating the destruction of evidence. You know all carefully inventoried and cataloged with circles and arrows on the back.

    Lest we forget, you know like we are supposed to, that this whole thing as about wikileaked DNC emails that exposed the chicanery in the upper echelon of the Democrat party. That was all about how the primaries were deliberately rigged in order to spike Sanders.

    Evidence that the Russians did it. None. You know except for all of the fraudulent stories that are supposed to be credible because of the detail mentioned about inventories of numbered documents and such.

    If the Russians did it, my heartfelt gratitude. All of Trumps shortcomings were brought to the surface by a media whose diligence is a decidedly directional process. All of Hillary’s shortcomings were downplayed, obfuscated or concealed.

    Evidence of Russians, none. The real story that is plain for all to see is the absolute corruption of the media. The nastiest are the women Journalists and Pundits.

    Content of character vs content of underwear. This is a wild swing of the pendulum.

    You say “… millions of us would rather die fighting with our last breath than live under the Democratic Party’s very clearly Stalinist option.”

    I say the possibilities of peaceful interaction are narrowing rapidly. I hope Trump stands his ground and doesn’t throw team members under the bus.

    Anyway, I bet Trump has watched the “based stick man” aka the “alt knight” and smirked a smirk or two.

    One thing I hesitate to say is, don’t underestimate the seriousness of pepper spray. In a really malicious circumstance it has been know to escalate to oven cleaner. Keep a careful eye on the size of spray cans in peoples’ hands. In my mind oven cleaner constitutes a deadly assault.

  4. Steve Carr Says:

    Of course he spied, he did it with the IRS, and all the other scandals the news media covers up. The future is alternative search engines. We all need to us another search engine and than we take away the governments power, who have become to powerful, or we just go back to yelling loud try Lookseek.com a no tracking search or one of the other alternative searches. Have a nice day

  5. Michael Eden Says:

    dog walker,

    As of right now there is ZERO evidence according to Obama-appointed intelligence officials that Trump or any of his team had anything to do with anything Russia did. There is however abundant evidence that Russia has done stuff like what now makes Democrats so furious for YEARS as well as abundant evidence that the United States has done stuff like this to other countries. There is abundant evidence that Obama did to Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu FAR WORSE than anything that Russia did to the US and to Hillary Clinton and used taxpayer dollars to pay for what the Democrats now say are crimes.

    So I supposed the very first thing Trump should do is ask Democrats if they would support arresting Obama and holding him criminally accountable for what he did to Israel, since it’s so, so awful.

    But now we have direct evidence that Obama’s key inner circle exploited our intelligence system and weaponized it for political purposes to target and attack Trump and those around him. We now find out that Obama used his top liar – Susan Rice, who went on national television and lied to every single human on planet earth not once but five times – to “unmask” Trump people.

    And again, if I were Trump I would announce that it will be the new administration policy to do the SAME DAMN THING to every single Democrat as we use “incidental intelligence gathering” as part of a coordinated system to embarrass and attack Democrats. If Susan Rice doesn’t belong in a prison cell, then reap the benefits of her brave new world, Thugocrats.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: