Archive for April, 2017

Yes, Democrats Want Criminal Illegal Immigrants On The Streets Preying On U.S. Citizens. And Here’s Irrefutable PROOF.

April 17, 2017

Democrats – an amalgam  standing for “DEMOnic bureaCRATS” – are baby butchers responsible for literally TEN TIMES the genocidal mass murder of Adolf Hitler to the tune of sixty million murdered babies created in the image of God.  They are perversion peddlers responsible for our sexually depraved, morally velocitized, toxic culture.  Democrats are literally NAZIS, using the exact same vicious, rabidly anti-free-speech and anti-democracy tactics that the Nazi stormtroopers did as they violently break up their opponents political rallies.  They are the party of drug addiction as they demand more and more access to more and more hard-core drugs that enslave more and more people even as they demand lighter and lighter sentences for the drug pimps who push those drugs on victims.  All of these things are easily demonstrated to be facts about these vile people.

And now there is undeniable proof that they are the party of hard-core VIOLENT criminals being free to walk the streets and continue to perpetuate their crimes against victims they want disarmed and helpless.

First of all, we can see Democrats literally going batpoop insane over President Trump’s policy on illegal immigration, with violent protest rallies going on across the nation as Democrats exalt in how evil and vile and violent they can be.  But FACT:

Arrests of illegal immigrants are UP 35%, but the vast majority of those arrests are of “immigrants” with CRIMINAL RECORDS.

During the Obama years, nearly ONE THIRD of MURDERS in many states involved ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS as the MURDERERS.

Now – FINALLY!!! – we have a president who is doing sweeps taking down the worst of the worst in the form of the vicious, murderous FOREIGN gang MS-13In Long Island Park just the other day four young men were beaten and tortured to death.  And of the thirteen arrested for those murders, TEN of them were “undocumented immigrants.”  Only days before that, two “UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANT” members of MS-13 were arrested for the “Satanic ritual” murder of a woman in Texas.

Democrats actually WANT those vicious monsters to remain in the United States.  They are literally that depraved and that evil.  And here’s the proof of what I’m claiming:

Under Obama, ICE was forced to release 86,266 CRIMINAL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS – yes, including murderers and rapists – just between 2013 and 2015.  I’m not kidding: yes, murderers and rapists.  It is AMAZING how much crime illegal immigrants released by Obama committed.  Just look at the toll in 2015 alone:

The Obama administration took fire at a House hearing Thursday for releasing back into society thousands of illegal immigrants who had committed crimes on U.S. soil – including those behind more than 200 murders.

“These are people that were here illegally, got caught committing a crime, were convicted of that crime and instead of deporting them, they were just released back out in the United States of America,” House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said.

According to a new report from the Center for Immigration Studies, Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 2015 “freed 19,723 criminal aliens, who had a total of 64,197 convictions among them.”

This included “8,234 violent convictions and 208 homicide convictions.”

And Obama – a proven serial liar – lied about the fact that the illegal immigrants he was releasing were committing TEN TIMES more crime than he was dishonestly claiming they were.

In all, Obama released 300,000 illegal immigrants who had committed criminal offenses.  And created a system whereby these and millions of other illegal immigrants could meld unnoticed and unapprehendable into our society.

This is Democrat Party politics driving Democrat Party policy.  And given the fact that the last two Democrat Party presidents are on the record expressing loathing for America, we can safely conclude that they don’t give one flying damn about the interests of the United States.

But let me continue with another story out of the leftist Los Angeles Times detailing Democrat Party policy using millions of dollars of mostly taxpayer money to do it:

Fearing mass deportations under President Trump, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and County Supervisor Hilda Solis stood together in December to unveil a $10-million fund to hire lawyers to defend local immigrants without legal status.

Modeled after programs in other cities, the L.A. Justice Fund will use city and county money and private donations to help those facing deportation proceedings.

But a proposal to bar immigrants with violent criminal convictions from using the fund is sparking protests from immigration advocacy groups, legal organizations and others in Los Angeles who argue that everyone has the right to an attorney.

The disagreement over who deserves legal representation is the latest issue to divide political leaders and progressive groups.

Some of the same groups fighting the L.A. Justice Fund’s criminal conviction provision also criticized Garcetti’s refusal to label Los Angeles a “sanctuary city.”

The debate over the L.A. Justice Fund mirrors the battle over a statewide legal fund under consideration by the state Legislature. That program, passed by the Senate earlier this month, also bars those with violent criminal convictions.

Garcetti spokesman George Kivork said in a statement the mayor wants the L.A. Justice Fund — which is expected to launch later this year — to prioritize children, heads of households and victims of domestic violence and human trafficking.
“The L.A. Justice Fund is designed to provide legal resources and services to those immigrant Angelenos who are Americans by every measure except the papers they hold, and are facing deportation proceedings without a lawyer,” Kivork said.
Garcetti’s position comes after he pushed for second chances for those with criminal pasts, signing a law in December that restricts employers from asking job applicants about criminal convictions until after a conditional offer of employment has been made. [blah, blah, blah]….

Immigration advocates cite similar programs in New York City that also use taxpayer dollars but don’t bar those with criminal convictions.

Excluding those with violent criminal convictions is “defining people by the worst things they’ve done,” said Steve Choi, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition. “People have done their time. Why punish them again through the immigration system?” [more blah, blah blah]

You need to realize that it isn’t that Democrat politicians don’t want to include violent felons under their umbrella of protection, it’s just that as vile as California Democrat voters are, even they are not quite that rabidly vile.  YET.  But realize that New York Democrats are already doing it and California Democrats will be doing everything possible to keep criminal illegal immigrant monsters on the streets preying on the innocent soon.

It’s just what Democrats do.  Because Democrats are evil people who stand for the perpetuation of every single kind of evil.

The “progressive movement” that makes up the heart and cockroach soul of the Democrat Party machine is screaming for criminals to be allowed on the street as long as they belong to Democrat Party special interest groups comprised by blacks, illegal immigrants, homosexuals, feminists. and violent anti-Trump thugs who viciously attack and beat Trump supporters at legally-permitted pro-Trump rallies.  In liberal bastion Berkeley, liberals – and please let’s just call them what they are: NAZIS – have now twice viciously done just that.  See here for March 6 and here for just the other day on April 15.  This continuing a trend in which the most intolerant people on earth – Democrats – use violence as a political weapon against their political opponents.

And again, we have already seen the proof that this violence was organized and orchestrated at the highest levels with Obama and Clinton knowledge and participation.  And when Democrats didn’t bus in the fascist goons, they were using a tactic called “bird-dogging” to try to incite violence that they could then manufacture themselves into being victims of.

But as of today, if you are a woman employer who wants to hire someone and you would like to know if the man you’re going to hire would rape you in a hot second, you vote REPUBLICAN.  Because Democrats literally don’t want you to know you just hired a rapist.  Democrats have actually made it a matter of LAW to FORBID employers from knowing that they might be hiring violent criminals.

Democrats and their feminist allies BELIEVE in the rape of a woman – as long as that rapist is a black man or a criminal illegal immigrant.

Criminal illegal immigrants, drug addiction, rampant perversion and the murder of tens of millions of children are nothing more than political weapons for these moral monsters.

Democrats have managed to turn every other vile special interest group into “victims,” and now they have “fundamentally transformed” the people who make it their business to turn people into victims of their vicious criminal behavior into “victims”, too.  Because, you know, there are people out there who for some strange, twisted reason don’t want to hire violent predatory monsters and bring them into their homes or their businesses.  And Democrats, being the party of pure evil, are now forcing you to hire them and bring them into your homes and businesses.

What Barack Obama And His Thug Regime Did Were Felonies And It’s Time To Start Filling Our Prison Cells With These Fascists

April 5, 2017

Susan Rice was behind some of THE most appalling and egregious Obama scandals in the conflation of naked partisan politics and foreign policy, and it should be no surprise that when it came time for Obama to do some truly vile and despicable work he would turn to his top liar.

In the aftermath of the debacle at Benghazi, Obama blabbermouth Susan Rice fasely claimed five times that it was a “spontaneous attack” rather than a planned, coordinated, premeditated terrorist attack and that a Youtube video was to blame even though we now have it documented that the “video” theory did NOT come from the intelligence community but was fabricated by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama during a phone call shortly before Hillary invented the video (created by an American citizen) as being responsible for the terrorist attack rather than a “broader failure of policy.”  Which even top Democrats have publicly admitted.  In that Benghazi attack, which was ENTIRELY preventable, the first American ambassador since the nadir of the failed Carter years was murdered by terrorists who “spontaneously” showed up complete with a heavy mortar, the highly skilled team that knew how to use that mortar, and precise coordinates for the US compound.  And according to Susan Rice, it all just “spontaneously” happened.

Susan Rice assured the American people – with complete and total and beyond disgraceful dishonesty – that an American traitor whom Obama traded five major terrorist generals for had “served his country with honor and distinction.”  Because according to Obama slandering the United States of America, slandering our American warriors, and then abandoning his fellow warriors and deserting to seek his new friends – you know, the ENEMY – was “serving with honor and distinction.”

Whenever there was a need to conflate or masquerade partisan politics as “national security,” Susan Rice was there.

And so here we had this White House staffer who was supposed to be planning US policy rather than conducting investigations into her boss’ political opponents’ intelligence dossiers, but somehow the woman who said for naked political reasons that a terrorist attack was not a terrorist attack and that a traitor had actually served with honor and distinction is now behind this clear and present danger to everything America stands for in that she is the face behind Obama’s “fundamentally transforming” our national security apparatus into a political weapon against the rival party of a sitting president.

To wit, if Susan Rice and everyone who had anything whatsoever to do with this disgrace don’t go to prison and do hard time, then President Trump should expand this tactic to include surveilling every single Democrat in America and allowing any embarrassing or incriminating information to be leaked.

And if you don’t like that idea, Democrat, then you had damn well better join me in calling for Susan Rice’s liver to be carved out of her screaming body and served with some fava beans and a nice chianti.  She needs to be broken or every single Democrat voter in America needs to be exposed and destroyed by the same process Obama created and cynically utilized against American citizens for the crime of belonging to the political party running against his favored candidate.

Let’s examine what we are learning:

Update: In response to a question Tuesday from NBC News reporter Andrea Mitchell,  former Obama White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice denied that she “prepared” spreadsheets of surveilled telephone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides. The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group, however, reported that Rice “ordered” the spreadsheets to be produced.
In addition, former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova, one of TheDCNF’s sources, said Tuesday in response to Rice that her denial “would come as quite a surprise to the government officials who have reviewed dozens of those spreadsheets.” 
Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.
“What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group Monday.
“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,” diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”
Other official sources with direct knowledge and who requested anonymity confirmed to TheDCNF diGenova’s description of surveillance reports Rice ordered one year before the 2016 presidential election.
Also on Monday, Fox News and Bloomberg News, citing multiple sources reported that Rice had requested the intelligence information that was produced in a highly organized operation. Fox said the unmasked names of Trump aides were given to officials at the National Security Council (NSC), the Department of Defense, James Clapper, President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, and John Brennan, Obama’s CIA Director.
Joining Rice in the alleged White House operations was her deputy Ben Rhodes, according to Fox.
Critics of the atmosphere prevailing throughout the Obama administration’s last year in office point to former Obama Deputy Defense Secretary Evelyn Farkas who admitted in a March 2 television interview on MSNBC that she “was urging my former colleagues,” to “get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration.”
Farkas sought to walk back her comments in the weeks following: “I didn’t give anybody anything except advice.”
Col. (Ret.) James Waurishuk, an NSC veteran and former deputy director for intelligence at the U.S. Central Command, told TheDCNF that many hands had to be involved throughout the Obama administration to launch such a political spying program.
“The surveillance initially is the responsibility of the National Security Agency,” Waurishuk said. “They have to abide by this guidance when one of the other agencies says, ‘we’re looking at this particular person which we would like to unmask.’”
“The lawyers and counsel at the NSA surely would be talking to the lawyers and members of counsel at CIA, or at the National Security Council or at the Director of National Intelligence or at the FBI,” he said. “It’s unbelievable of the level and degree of the administration to look for information on Donald Trump and his associates, his campaign team and his transition team. This is really, really serious stuff.”
Michael Doran, former NSC senior director, told TheDCNF Monday that “somebody blew a hole in the wall between national security secrets and partisan politics.” This “was a stream of information that was supposed to be hermetically sealed from politics and the Obama administration found a way to blow a hole in that wall,” he said.
Doran charged that potential serious crimes were undertaken because “this is a leaking of signal intelligence.”
“That’s a felony,” he told TheDCNF. “And you can get 10 years for that. It is a tremendous abuse of the system. We’re not supposed to be monitoring American citizens. Bigger than the crime, is the breach of public trust.”
Waurishuk said he was most dismayed that “this is now using national intelligence assets and capabilities to spy on the elected, yet-to-be-seated president.”
“We’re looking at a potential constitutional crisis from the standpoint that we used an extremely strong capability that’s supposed to be used to safeguard and protect the country,” he said. “And we used it for political purposes by a sitting president. That takes on a new precedent.”

NSC veteran and former deputy director for intelligence at the U.S. Central Command James Waurishuk also said:

“We’re looking at a potential constitutional crisis from the standpoint that we used an extremely strong capability that’s supposed to be used to safeguard and protect the country,” he said. “And we used it for political purposes by a sitting president. That takes on a new precedent.”

I am sitting here in amazement that the Los Angeles Times is in the middle of their probably never-ending editorial board sliming of President Trump.  Today’s story is about the allegedly fascist way President Trump is handling the media.  Conveniently forgotten about is any mention of how President Obama did stuff that Nixon NEVER did by falsely and dishonestly and yes, criminally labeling a Fox News journalist as a “co-conspirator” in order to place him and his parents under surveillance which including monitoring their phone records, his movements and his emails.  And Obama did this to Fox News journalists after repeatedly publicly demonizing them.

The LA Times is so outraged about “fake news” but somehow all the fake news that came out about Benghazi and Bergdhal and ObamaCare and the Iran deal and about 20 trillion other things somehow never made it to their level of concern.  And now if Donald Trump fails to dot an “i” they’re denouncing it as the worst lie imaginable.

When Obama was pumping out “fake news” about our victories in what he refused to call the war on terror because he had dismissed it as an “overseas contingency operation,” he broke the world.  In 2014 we had the worst terrorist outbreak IN DECADES under his failed watchIn 2015 no human being on earth was more responsible for the giant surge of terrorism than the Los Angeles Times’ favorite Messiah, Obama.  And by the time Obama’s record is fully revealed, he will have been responsible for a one-thousand, nine-hundred percent skyrocketing of death by terrorism.

The Los Angeles Times proved once and for all that they are a “fake news” outlet when they covered up rather than reported actual NEWS they had of the intimate link between Obama and a terrorist named Rashid Khalidi.  They’re nothing but a bunch of Joseph Goebbels propagandists who refused to allow video of Hitler’s trembling and diseased left hand from being seen by the German people.  And they are nothing more than that.

Barack Obama is a criminal who belongs in prison.  Or Donald Trump should pursue Obama’s tactics like a rabid dog.  Or we should completely dismantle a security apparatus that is now clearly and demonstrably unworthy of trust because it exists as a political weapon to target half of the American people and their political leaders.

We now know exactly what happened: the Obama administration, as Michael Doran put it, blew a hole in the wall between national security and the most nakedly partisan politics.  They created a system whereby they could request the most classified information from our most classified sources, and because they had so radically expanded the process of who that information would be shared with, they intentionally guaranteed that anything they wanted leaked would GET leaked even if the top Obama White House thugs didn’t specifically leak it themselves.  And we now know that they were even compiling dossiers on their political enemies in and throughout a presidential election year.

We know two things from this:

  1. If anything, Vladimir Putin saved America, because Barack Obama now stands revealed as the most nakedly un-American and anti-American leader in the history of this republic.  And if Putin is a demon, Obama is Satan himself.
  2. The whole “Russian hacking” scandal is manufactured by the very traitorous criminals that Susan Rice served.

This was an interesting read on the whole “Russian hacking” crap that the mainstream media is so rabidly slobbering over while studiously ignoring the fact that the Obama administration committed the most heinous and egregious betrayal of our entire American way of life imaginable:

There can be little doubt that the whole Russian hacking narrative was invented by the Deep State, and then massaged and leaked by top Obama officials including Rice, Brennan and numerous others for one purpose alone that had nothing to do with national security.
That is, to prevent the election of an impetuous, strong-willed anti-globalist that the establishment deeply disapproved and then to re-litigate the election once the unthinkable happened on November 8th.
So not only is the whole hacking story essentially a glorified piece of opposition research peddled by the DNC and its affiliates, whatever “forensic evidence”  that may exist was undoubtedly manufactured by the Deep State itself.
That’s right. Owing to the latest Wikileaks disclosures of March 2017 via a trove of leaked CIA documents it calls “Vault 7,” it now appears that all of the other dubious intelligence community’s claims and “assessments” about Russian hacking have been ash-canned.
That is, Vault 7 suggests the CIA has the ability to manufacture and deposit electronic trails to “misdirect attribution” by leaving false cyber fingerprints.
Using a library of foreign malware and hacking tools, the CIA can plant Russian, Chinese, Iranian or other hackers’ fingerprints to make the hackers appear to be from one of those countries — even as they do the job from the comfort of their offices in Langley, VA.
Needless to say, that explains how the alleged Russian hackers could be so “clumsy” as to leave obvious and damning fingerprints on their work.
So it is probable that the Russians were “clumsy” because they weren’t actually “Russians”. They were undoubtedly CIA operatives from the Center for Cyber Intelligence.

There is no “Russian hacking” story.  Obama tried to hack the Israeli election and force Benjamin Netanyahu out of office and used US taxpayer money to fund his hacking operation.  Put Obama in jail for that or shut the hell up.  But what there IS is proof that Obama “fundamentally transformed” our national government AND our intelligence system that we have trusted to protect Americans into enemies of the American people.

This is the largest step toward a totalitarian regime this nation has ever seen.  This is naked fascism.  This is Stalinist.

And these people need to be put in prison for it.

As Democrats Come Psychologically Unglued Over Judge Gorsuch, Remember What Dishonest Hypocrite Pieces Of Rat Filth They Are

April 4, 2017

As we see Democrats now going completely batpoop over an eminently qualified judge who received a unanimous confirmation vote when he was confirmed to the federal judgeship that was his stepping stone to the Supreme Court because he was so obviously qualified and so obviously a great choice, let’s take a trip down memory lane to examine whether Democrats have any legitimate moral grounds whatsoever to oppose – let alone try to block or filibuster – his nomination.

Let’s call those days “B.O.” for “Before Obama.”  Because Barack Obama brought a spirit of division over this nation that will literally likely be the death of this country.

Barack Obama is THE most bitterly polarizing, divisive force this nation has ever seen.  And now what he’s doing is being called a “government in exile.”

The Nazis called it a “Fifth Column.”  I call it “treason” against the United States and against the will of the people as expressed according to our democratic values and principles.

The Democrats are now “justifying” their attempt to sink this nation to a new, bitter, divisive, polarizing low because Republicans refused to call Obama’s pick (Judge Merrick Garland) for a full vote after the death of sitting Justice Antonin Scalia.

The Democrats would have you believe that they would NEVER EVER have EVER done anything like this.  Let’s see if that’s true, or if Democrats truly stands for “DEMOnic bureauCRATS” as I maintain it does.

I wrote this a couple of months ago.  It’s a good time to quote the actual, factual record again:

But let’s get back to Obama and the vile, vicious tactics that he inspired as our nations very first “community organizer” president.

Back in 2009 I was pointing out what a total, abject LIE the heart of the Obama promise to America had turned out to be.  This guy was so damn partisan that it was beyond unreal from the moment he took office.  And yet  The New York Times had written of Obama as candidate:

WASHINGTON — At the core of Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign is a promise that he can transcend the starkly red-and-blue politics of the last 15 years, end the partisan and ideological wars and build a new governing majority.

To achieve the change the country wants, he says, “we need a leader who can finally move beyond the divisive politics of Washington and bring Democrats, independents and Republicans together to get things done.”

But this promise leads, inevitably, to a question: Can such a majority be built and led by Mr. Obama, whose voting record was, by one ranking, the most liberal in the Senate last year?

Was Obama EVER a man capable of rising above partisan politics?  No.  Not even CLOSE.  Absolutely not.  As an easy example of that, as a Senator he was one of THE most radical liberal-progressives and unsuccessfully tried to filibuster Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court.  Even Obama’s own party at that point acknowledged that what Obama tried to do was way, WAY too radical.

And so:

However, the truth is that, when they were senators, Obama, Biden, and Clinton all tried to filibuster Justice Alito’s nomination to the court – and other Democratic party leaders such as NY Senator Chuck Schumer reveled in the idea that they were able to block every Bush #43 nomination to the federal courts.

But the Democratic Party went über-fascist radical, and thus the toxic, divisive, polarizing Obama became the nominee of the Democratic Party and ultimately the president.  And the similarly über-fascist radical Joe Biden became vice president; and then the likewise über-fascist radical Hillary Clinton would sure-enough be the following rabid candidate for the Democrat Party machine.

Through his press mouthpiece, Obama as president would ultimately – and cowardly – come to say he “regretted” his decision to be one of the most leftist partisan members of the U.S. Senate when his own damn tactics were brought up in his face to reveal the utter and abject moral hypocrisy that is “Democratic Party.”

So it’s morally evil now to do what Obama did, you see.  Obama ought to be able to do it and get away with it, and later on when it becomes politically inconvenient, well, Obama ought to be able to retreat behind a press secretary mouthpiece and say that he now regrets it.  Such that Republicans have no right to do exactly what Obama himself did.

Let’s go back to Joe Biden: Because We also have the example of Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden who in 1992 said when there was just a POSSIBILITY that George H.W. Bush MIGHT be able to nominate a Supreme Court Justice:

“It is my view that if the president goes the way of Presidents Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until ever — until after the political campaign season is over.” — Sen. Joe Biden, June 25, 1992

President George H.W. Bush was in office until January 20, 1993.  So Biden didn’t even say this in a presidential election year – the way it was when our Hypocrite-in-Chief Obama demanded the divine right to replace conservative Scalia with a leftist of his choice – rather Biden said the Democrat garbage tactic applied even in the year BEFORE the election year.

Only Democrats are hypocrite enough to not be able to see what abject hypocrite roaches they are.

As we talk about the Republican response to Obama’s selection of Judge Merrick Garland to replace Justice Antonin Scalia in an election year and the consequences of the Republican response today, allow me to take you on a trip down hypocrite Democrat lane from what I wrote at that time:

Democrats have a LONG history of doing the very thing they now claim is so evil:

While Democrats in the upper chamber – including Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and former Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, both of which called for blocking former President George W. Bush’s nominations – have slammed the GOP for its decision not to consider a nominee until after a new president is elected, Democrats have not always held that stance. The Democrat-controlled Senate passed a resolution in 1960 preventing a recess appointment, much to the dismay of Republicans.

As first reported by The Washington Post – S.RES. 334, also known as Expressing the Sense of the Senate That The President Should Not Make Recess Appointments to the Supreme Court, Except to Prevent or End a Breakdown in the Administration of the Court’s Business – passed the Senate in a 48-33 vote in an attempt to prevent former President Dwight Eisenhower from filling a seat last-minute.

Democrats have frequently played this same game.   New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, now the Senate Minority Leader and leader of all the Senate Democrats, said when a Republican was president that the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”

And so this incredibly dishonest claim from Obama and the Democrats is so much nonsense it is beyond unreal: if anything, it IS unprecedented, other than all the damn times THEY did the very thing they now so loudly and dishonestly and hypocritically insist that Republicans would be violating sacred precedent to do.

Let me keep going from my same article on just what hypocrite pieces of dishonest roach filth Democrats are:

Here’s another thing: the Senate is now firmly in Republican hands (after disgraceful Democrats were caught being evil maybe a million times too often).  But when Democrats owned the Senate, they shoved their crap right down the Republicans’ throats and changed the damn Senate rules to do it with a process that was so toxic to the Constitution that it was called “the nuclear option.”

On November 21, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared that “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” by Republican filibusters had made the confirmation process “completely unworkable.”[1] As a result, he said, Democrats were forced to eliminate virtually all nomination filibusters. […]

For nearly all of its history, proceeding to a final vote on a matter before the Senate required a supermajority.

But not when Democrats stole the show.  No, no, no, the rules of all propriety and decency and civility go right out the damn window every damn time it pleases them.  Just like the Nazi Party and Jews, the Democrat Party calls the Republicans “evil” and then justifies the most wildly partisan and cynical “final solutions.”

Ever since the Supreme Court became a “super legislature” thanks to the wicked Democrat Party, where they ruled by imposing massive societal change by finding “penumbras and emanations” that justified whatever the HELL they wanted to do, the SCOTUS has become a political branch.  And Obama just started another vicious war while blathering dishonest words that he was somehow above doing the very thing he is clearly doing.

Who “fundamentally transformed” “nearly all of the Senate’s history”???  Don’t EVER forget it was the DEMOCRATS.  Just as it was the DEMOCRATS who invented Borking and it was the DEMOCRATS who are the ones who actually FILIBUSTER judicial appointments.  Bill Clinton and Barack Obama BOTH did NOT have a Republican filibuster.  The ONLY two judges sitting on the court who didn’t receive sixty votes are Justice Thomas and Justice Alito.  Because the Democrat Party has been the official party of Butthurt for decades.

If you want to see what “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” truly looks like, look at what Democrats have done since Trump got elected.  These butthurt fascists are psychologically unhinged with rabid acts of “obstruction” taking place at every corner that no, you demon-possessed liars, the Republicans NEVER did.

It’s really not the “nuclear option”; it’s the “Harry Reid option”; it’s the “Democrat Party option.”  And it is a GOOD thing Republicans are now willing to use the same tactics Democrats used against them.  And it’s an evil, wicked thing that the mainstream media is FINALLY seeing this as an “extreme tactic” given that they somehow failed to think that way when their beloved Democrat Party was using the tactic to impose their will when THEY ran Washington.

And so, in that same vein, Charles Schumer – now the leader of the Democrat minority – controls a party that literally announced they were going to object to ANYONE Trump nominated simply because on their view, anyone who doesn’t think exactly like they do is “unqualified” to serve.

Democrats actually swore they would filibuster Trump’s nominee even before Trump nominated anyone.

Democrats promise they will use the slander-tactic that they invented now known as “Borking”: This infamous Ted Kennedy slander was the worst of the slanders:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

Robert Bork was a good man and eminently qualified to sit on the Court.  But Democrats are truly breathtakingly evil and hypocritical people.

In the same manner, Justice Clarence Thomas literally faced down the Ku Klux Klan as a child who grew up as the child of a poor sharecropper in a house with a dirt floor – only to find the Democrats’ more evil and more psychotic and more dishonest.  As an example, the modern Klan monsters are BLACK Democrats who were willing to lynch Thomas for the sin of having a white wife.  And Democrats said in their vote, “You don’t get to do that and survive, uppity negro.”  They manufactured the very first “high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves” by finding a backstabbing woman who had followed Judge Thomas from job to job for YEARS only to claim that he sexually harassed her the entire time that she had willingly kept following him.

And so, all the Obama crap about it being beyond the pale for a Senate to treat a nomination to the Supreme Court this way, all I can say in response is that now you get to eat Republican fecal matter right out of the toilet bowl, you wicked hypocrite butthurt LIARS.

When Barack Obama – after trying to community organize a filibuster against Bush SCOTUS appointees – appointed two far-left liberal progressive radicals to the Court, Republicans responded by allowing their nomination to go forward and even allowing their members to vote for her in a spirit of bipartisan compromise.  Because they believed a president ought to have a right to nominate judges out of his philosophy, especially on the Supreme Court, even when they personally disagree with those judges’ philosophy of jurisprudence.

So Democrats never had to exploit their own Harry Reid-invented “Democrat option” – a.k.a. the nuclear option – to get a vote for Obama’s SCOTUS picks because Republicans respected the process in a way that Democrats have now proven over and over again they are not capable of respecting.  It was Democrats who invented and then repeatedly used the politics of personal slander-destruction against Republican nominees.

Democrats are not human beings worthy of the name; they have abandoned as a matter of wicked philosophy any concept of the imago dei.  Democrats are evolved bugs, and they only capable of bug morality.  You could rescue a cockroach, nurture it back to health, feed it, but the moment it was time to reciprocate, that roach would happily EAT YOU ALIVE.

So what goes around comes around, Democrats.  What went around a few months ago – when Republicans refused to consider replacing the most conservative justice with an Obama-picked liberal that would overthrow the balance of the SCOTUS in an election year when the will of the people as expressed in the presidential vote was the best way to determine what the balance of the court should be – went around BECAUSE YOU DEMOCRATS STARTED IT.  Just like every other outrage, YOU did it FIRST.  Republicans didn’t do anything relating to Judge Garland that Democrats didn’t announce that they were going to do.  So let what you said you would do be done according to your word, Democrats.  Only it’s NEVER fascism when a fascist does anything, is it?  And what is now going around is the nuclear option that your side invented to use against the Republicans who are using your damned “Democrat option” now.

There is NOTHING worse than hypocrisy.  And Democrats prove every nanosecond of every day that they are the living, breathing embodiment of abject moral hypocrisy.

We are now watching Democrats across the country openly defying the laws of our land, which makes them by definition “lawless.”  If Democrats like a law, then they demand everyone else be compelled to follow that law.  Consider the Christian baker and the Christian wedding photographer who were bankrupted by Democrats because they didn’t believe in homosexual marriage and didn’t want to be forced to participate in it or endorse it.  Democrats rabidly threw EVERYTHING that hate could throw at those people whose crime was trying to live according to their faith that was the foundation for America from day one.   Consider the county clerk who refused to certify gay marriages: this woman was literally put in JAIL by Democrats for following her conscience.  Consider the Arizona law and Obama suing the state and saying immigration was the jurisdiction of the federal government and states and lower districts simply don’t have a right to interfere with the president’s federal policies.  Remember the Democrats’ argument back then that federal law PREEMPTS state law and that the federal government had the right to impose its will onto the states when it came to immigration enforcement.  Remember all that?  And now look at Democrats turn on all of that with a feral, rabid snarl when it comes to illegal immigration and our LAWS and say that they should have a right to have sanctuary cities and sanctuary states and that Donald Trump should be compelled to give them federal money in spite of their defiance of the law.

We are either a nation of laws or we are not.  The same liberals who say that Christians have no right whatsoever to a religious conscience in spite of the 1st Amendment very clearly saying something different now say that the ONLY right one can have is based on a LIBERAL conscience.  Or what I call a cockroach conscience.

Democrats are more than just genocidal baby-murdering sexual perverts today: they are true fascists who are as rabidly and even violently intolerant of anyone or anything they disagree with as the Nazis were.  They now claim that they have the right to “safe-spaces” which amounts to anyone who disagrees with them having the right to cease to exist.  Meanwhile they show up at rally after rally with VIOLENCE even as they cry that they are the victims of “intolerance.”  Because they are the very worst hypocrites in the history of the world.

Use the nuclear option.  Seat Justice Neil Gorsuch.  And next time, understanding that we are in a war to the death with liberals in this country, that we are literally fighting over whether this nation WILL survive and whether this nation even DESERVES to survive, next time get a far-rightwing pick who will truly be to the right what ACLU hero Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been to the left.  The next judge should believe that the Constitution is a living, breathing document subject to change, believing that a judge ought to be the determiner of whether our society changes or not, and impose his hard right conservative Republican will on the law.  Because, after all, he’s a judge, and the law is after all whatever the hell a judge says it is.  And we should keep forcing judges like that now until the left finally understands that the only hope for this nation is a return to what our founding fathers demanded from judges: that they interpret the law according to the unchanging standards of the Constitution of the United States unless and until the Congress amends it according to the system the founders provided, rather than cite “penumbras” and “emanations” as their basis for imposing their preferences onto the law of the land.