It was a terrible event that forever scarred my life: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagen once fondled me at a party. I can’t recall where the party was or what year the party happened, I don’t remember how I got there or how I got home. And all the witnesses I name whom I say saw it happen actually swear under oath that they hadn’t seen any such thing and my story is “nuts.” But these three judges need to step down and resign. After all, an accusation was made, and an accusation by itself ought to be more than enough to destroy someone’s life because, after all, these three justices cannot prove that they WEREN’T at a place I claim I can’t remember during a time I claim I can’t recall. This is the very black roach heart of lawlessness that violates every due process protection that is at the heart of what makes our Constitution great. And cockroach fascist Democrats are pissing all over those protections as we speak.
Give me your name and I’ll find someone to accuse you of a terrible, despicable sexual act, date unspecified, time unspecified, place unspecified, and if you cannot prove that you were never at a date that isn’t specified and a time that isn’t specified and a location that isn’t specified, by your very own toxic ideology you ought to be destroyed if you cannot prove what is impossible for you to prove no matter whether you’re completely innocent or not. How can you prove you weren’t at a particular place when your accuser won’t tell you where the place is? Or how can you prove you weren’t even at a damn party on a particular night because you can show you were somewhere else when your accuser doesn’t have to bother to say when the alleged assault took place?
And so yes, we actually have the direct quote of the Democrat Party’s current strategy: “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.” These boastful words that come right out of current Democrat activist thought were spoken by Joseph Stalin’s deputy premier, Lavrentiy Beria. Stalin frequently stayed up late into the night signing thousands – ultimately millions – of death sentences based on evidence such as is being proferred by these Democratic activists. They just made up crimes for whoever they wanted to based on their political needs at the moment.er how innocent you actually are of the allegation.
This is the ascendance of a leftist – and frankly communist – college culture into our system of law where the accused is presumed to be guilty unless proven innocent. False allegations by women in this toxic communist culture has destroyed many young men who had every single one of their constitutional rights stripped away from them by a pathologically toxic communist college culture. No legitimate legal system would tolerate this horrifying deprivation of rights, but college campuses have been doing this since the toxic prince of evil – Barack Hussein Obama – further poisoned the college system to make it even more vile than it had already been. Men do not get to go to court: they are destroyed by mere allegations even when those allegations are false. Even when the supposed victim says it never happened, men are being destroyed by this process. And not infrequently it is black men being destroyed by such false allegations.
In Communist China, which cockroach Democrats yearn to have here, the accused is guilty until proven innocent as an essential component of their legal system. And if the State wants you to be guilty, you are guilty regardless of whether you are innocent or not. That is precisely what Democrats want here.
Democrats keep claiming “this isn’t a trial.” Yeah, right. It’s way more akin to this:
This scene from “The Crucible” was written by a man named Arthur Miller who was using witchhunts as political analogy to describe what was going on during a period we today call “McCarthyism,” when just an accusation was enough to get a completely innocent person destroyed.
Brett Kavanaugh is being used in a vicious, partisan, toxically-political way as the stand-in for EVERY female accusation. If ANY woman EVER has EVER ONCE been sexually assaulted, then Brett Kavanaugh is somehow guilty and ought to be destroyed.
Any woman who has a father, or a brother, or a little boy, desperately needs to go out and vote Republican in droves. Or watch their men be destroyed by a rabidly evil Democrat Party system of “justice.”
I want you to realize that the Democrats who are saying “This isn’t a trial are the very people who as Senators have the privilege of confirming JUDGES. And what Democrats are screaming right now is that the rule of law is not necessary for any judge to bother following; the presumption of innocence is not necessary for any judge to follow; due process is not necessary for any judge to follow. If the Senate that confirms judges doesn’t have any such requirements, then the judges they confirm sure as hell don’t, either. Good damn luck if you appear before a traffic court judge who has chosen to follow Democrat Party standards and judged you guilty just because that judge didn’t need any actual evidence to destroy your life.
It’s not enough to suggest that Judge Brett Kavanaugh would be convicted on the so-called “evidence” presented against him that he is a would-be rapist; he wouldn’t even be ARRESTED by any legitimate legal process given the fact that there have been ZERO damn facts and ZERO damn witnesses presented to corroborate ANYTHING these slanderers have claimed.
Our Constitution enshrines two concepts as sacred to our legal proceedings: due process and a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The fact that Democrats are rabidly attacking BOTH of these sacred aspects of our Constitution ought to terrify any decent human being. These people are now far worse than McCarthyism ever was and are on the verge of reaching the psychotic level of the French Revolution just before the Reign of Terror when a meritless accusation meant a death sentence.
Democrats have also thrown out in addition to due process and presumption of innocence the rule of law. Let’s consider that Dianne Feinstein made an incredibly cynical and vile decision to sit on this allegation for seven full weeks. What should she have done if the rule of law were followed rather than the mystery of lawlessness being revealed?
When Senator Dianne Feinstein received very serious allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, she could have—and should have—handled those concerns through the committee’s normal protocols. This process, which applies not just to Supreme Court nominees but to hundreds of judicial and Justice Department appointments, is specifically designed to protect the interests of both accusers and nominees. The process is both confidential and bipartisan. Its goal is to pursue the truth, not political advantage. That Senator Feinstein inexplicably chose not to handle the serious allegation Dr. Christine Blasey Ford made against Judge Kavanaugh according to these procedures has had terrible consequences for all the individuals involved and has done lasting damage to the Senate and the Supreme Court as institutions.
The Democrats chose to “fundamentally transform” what was supposed to be an orderly process into a monkey-poop-throwing contest. What they have proven is that they are rabid perverts of everything our nation was supposed to stand for when it came to how accused people are constitutionally required to be treated.
But there is so much more in this toxic betrayal by Democrats out of very simple, visceral political ideology and tactics: Dr. Ford through her legal team has steadfastly been demanding that Judge Kavanaugh be required to speak first and then she be allowed to speak afterward and rebut whatever he says.
That method of “getting to the truth” actually DOES have historical precedent: it was how Spain handled accusations during a very grim, very dark period known as “The Spanish Inquisition.” The accused would be required to defend himself or herself against accusations that had not yet formally been made. Which means it was nearly impossible for any kind of defense. It was a wicked time. And Democrats very badly want to go back to the periods and tactics of the very most wicked regimes and periods in history. Democrats are literally invoking the same standard used in the Spanish Inquisition to produce the same wicked results the Inquisition produced. That’s who these vile people are.
How is Judge Kavanaugh supposed to defend himself against a charge that he did something, time never mentioned, time never mentioned, place never mentioned. How is he supposed to have any chance whatsoever to prove that he wasn’t at that particular place at that particular time???
Imagine this was your son being destroyed like this, liberal. And for the record, I mean, imagine this happened to one of our sons that you DIDN’T murder in the abortion mills. I mean, imagine you had any capacity for any human love for your offspring at all. Oh, what the hell, I’m wasting my time asking for human empathy for Democrats: they’re bugs. They murder their own babies. They have bug souls. Of course they cannot be reached with any human appeal to empathy.
Amazingly, Democrats demand that we throw out actual convictions on the basis that the prosecutors or the judge or the jury was somehow “racist” or “biased,” even as they themselves right now are demanding that an entire group of people – men – are guilty merely by virtue of the fact that they are “men” “and we all know how them people are.” The Democrats and their rabid media propagandist have slobbered all over themselves framing the Republicans as “a bunch of white men.” What the hell does this have to do with RACE??? Both the accused and the accusers are WHITE. But Democrats are the very worst kind of demagogues and they play every red-herring fiddle they have in their arsenal of demonic tricks whether those demonic tricks have anything the hell to do with their case at hand or not. So they use the word “white” just because they know they can inflame their followers with even more rabid hate than these haters already have. And the funniest thing of all is, virtually every Democrat playing the “white” card were THEMSELVES WHITE!!!
I’m going to put the essence of the world the left wants to create in terms of the Aryan and the Jew: when an Aryan accuses a Jew of committing a crime – any crime with or without any evidence whatsoever – the Jew is presumed guilty even if there is some way to prove the Jew innocent. And all you’ve got to do is substitute a couple of words to see that what I’m claiming is true: exchange “Aryan” for “feminist woman” and “Jew” for “conservative man.”
If a liberal woman accuses a conservative man of rape or sexual harassment or just being a bad man, that woman is to be believed regardless of any or all lack of evidence and even if that woman’s accusation is literally destroyed by any witnesses she claims saw the alleged event. Which is precisely what is happening to Judge Kavanaugh.
Still another issue that needs to be mentioned is the Democrats’ demand that this allegation be investigated by the FBI, which has made a public statement that the FBI doesn’t the hell investigate these kind of political charges. It should at this point be mentioned that the Democrats have been rabidly screaming themselves into padded-rubber-room hysteria crying for any delay they can call for since Kavenaugh was brought forward to begin the confirmation process. The fact is that Democrats were screaming to delay the process from the moment the process began even before anyone (but Diane Feinstein, who concealed the allegations for obvious political reasons I’m about to point out) KNEW about any sexual allegations. Which amounts to a cynical opportunity from the most cynical people on the face of the earth to cynically scream for the same cynical delay they’ve already been screaming for. They have been stalling and stalling, hoping they can draw out the nomination process long enough for the upcoming election to change the political landscape in a manner that would mean that Judge Brett Kavenaugh never be confirmed.
And so Diane Feinstein sat on allegations that should have gone to the subcommittee for a fair and impartial hearing and investigation had there been any fairness or impartiality in any Democrat on the face of the earth. Had they actually given ONE FLYING DAMN about any actual investigation, they would not have wasted SEVEN WEEKS THAT COULD HAVE AND WOULD HAVE BEEN SPENT INVESTIGATING. Instead, they pissed away any ability the Republicans had to be able to spend significant time investigating just so they could frame Republicans with the bogus and false charge of refusing to investigate. These people are the worst kind of liars and the worst kind of manipulators there are or ever have been.
But it gets better, because had the FBI actually DONE an investigation, we have these words from former Senator and former Obama Vice President Joe Biden;
Joe Biden snarled back then:
“The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything. FBI does not in this or any other case reach a conclusion…”
So why do they want what they mocked when the FBI investigated the bogus sexual allegations against the last Justice the wicked pervert Democrats tried to demonically frame??? The same damn reason Diane Feinstein threw the rule of law and 230 years of Senate custom out the window when she sat on allegations for seven weeks, had multiple opportunities to question Brett Kavanaugh about these allegations herself and refused to mention the allegations at any time to any one during the entire conformation hearing, only to leak them after the hearing had already ended: to create as much of a climate of rabid, toxic hatred as this wicked woman from a wicked party could possibly foment. To stall for time, using the cheapest, most dishonest, most vile imaginable stuns to do what the legitimate democratic process and Constitution prevents them from doing and destroy a Supreme Court nominee with the worst slanders.
Christine Blasey Ford – a leftist university professor who has spent a lifetime being a liberal activist, who attended an anti-Trump women’s march in Los Angeles in April 2017 (and was documented and even quoted as having done so in a news article by the San Jose Mercury News), who signed a letter blasting Trump’s border policy and who is also a leftist climate change activist – recently decided that Judge Brett Kavanaugh groped her and would have likely done worse had his friend Mark Judge was in the room and jumped on top of the two and stopped what she claims would have been a rape and gave her time to run out of the room. The only problem with her story is that Mark Judge said this never happened, that he had NEVER seen Brett Kavanaugh do anything remotely close to that, and that literally this is “absolutely nuts” and ” I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”
Another witness that Ford says was there – Patrick J. Smyth – also says Ford is simply not telling the truth:
“I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as ‘PJ’ who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post,” Smyth says in his statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh.”
Both men have now sworn under oath, under penalty of perjury, that what Dr. Ford claims to have happened did not happen as she claims. Because she claims they were there and they say under penalty of perjury that that is false.
These men and Judge Kavanaugh himself were questioned under penalty of perjury. You would think Democrats would want to be part of such a session, but they were completely and utterly disinterested in truth or anything close to searching for the truth. Not one single Democrat appeared at the hearing because there is literally not one single decent or honest Democrat.
Another person claimed by Christine Blasey Ford to have attended a gathering decades ago during which, Ford claims, she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has denied any recollection of having attended the party.
In an email to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Saturday, Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate of Ford’s at the Holton-Arms all-girls school in Maryland, said she doesn’t know Kavanaugh or remember being at the party with him.
“Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford,” lawyer Howard J. Walsh III of Bethesda, Md., conveyed in an email to the committee that was obtained by Fox News.
At what point do you dismiss Ford’s fake allegation as what it is – a politically-motivated slander – and vote to confirm a justice who has an unimpeachable record??? At NO point, if you are a demon-possessed cockroach, A.K.A. a Democrat.
Amazingly, the Democrats’ main talking point is that “Dr. Ford has no motivation to lie!” Which is as false as the claim that they have no motivation to lie. Let me just put it this way: is it literally the claim of every Democrat that the Democratic Party and the left are NOT fired up in protest of the Kavanaugh nomination??? Are they actually pretending that leftist women like Dr. Ford couldn’t care less whether Justice Kavanaugh would take away abortion rights??? Not only are these leftists surrounding Ford demonstration that, yes, Dr. Ford and these leftists SURE AS HELL DO have a motivation to lie, but that in fact they are actually LYING when they claim they don’t have a motivation to lie.
Dr. Ford testifies that she is afraid of flying as a result of her horrible attack by that horrible man, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. She stole a week of the nation’s time stalling – strangely EXACTLY like the Democrats want her to do which is strange unless she’s a militant liberal activist … oh, that’s right, she IS a militant liberal activist! – claiming that she couldn’t fly to Washington D.C. BUT STRANGELY THAT DIDN’T BOTHER HER WHEN SHE MOVED TO HAWAII and apparently forgot all about this lifelong trauma that made her so terrified of doing what she made a conscious decision to do and get on an airplane and FLY when it was convenient.
Abortion and the other liberal issues like abortion are what this is all about. And so all of a sudden a judge who had just sailed through his nomination hearing is viciously slandered with an attack that he attacked a woman at a party, place unknown, year unknown, but let’s not let facts get in the way of our slander of a judge who has an unimpeachable record and who has gone through six different FBI background checks in his life.
My contention, for the record, is this: Dr. Ford might possibly be telling the truth recounting some sexual assault she experienced at some point in her life, but she is flagrantly lying about who her assaulter was. It was NOT Brett Kavanaugh, and the reason she has to “disremember” every single other relevant detail other than her contention that she was assaulted is that Kavanaugh was never anywhere where he could have assaulted her. My contention is that Ford is lying because she literally believes it is noble to lie if lying will stop Judge Kavanaugh from becoming a Supreme Court Justice and overturning the political values we know for a FACT Ford espouses.
What party is Ford talking about? Well, that’s kind of impossible to be certain about, given that Ford does not have to say what party, or where the party supposedly was, or what day the party was on, or what month the party happened, or even what dang freaking YEAR the party happened.
Other than a naked political show trial, I doubt very much that a single prosecutor would take on such a detail-free case without any ability to verify or substantiate any part of her story, or that any judge would agree to hold court to such a case. The FBI doesn’t want anything whatsoever to do with it, arguing completely correctly that taking on such an investigation is not part of their lawful perview because the alleged act would be a state rather than federal crime. But the Democrats claim that President Trump should do something that is nothing more than a hardcore partisan Democrat delaying tactic and order the FBI to investigate. And I don’t doubt that Democrats also demand that disgraced and fired Trump-hating former FBI agent Peter Strzok and his paramour Lisa Page be the lead investigators, too. This is that damn ridiculous.
Interestingly, Prof. Christine Blasey Ford initially claimed she wanted to have the right to be heard. But when the Republicans gave her the opportunity, all of a sudden the story changed, and she didn’t want to be heard as she ignored not one but more than ELEVEN SEPARATE ATTEMPTS TO REACH HER TO GIVE HER PRECISELY THE OPPORTUNITY SHE HAD CLAIMED SHE WANTED. No, her lawyers were taking their orders from the Democratic Party which was demanding a full FBI investigation that would take months and delay the nomination until after the election when they believe they will have the numbers to block it forever. Not that Ford or any of her lawyers have any political motivation whatsoever, of course (just gag me).
Another fun claim by the left is that Dr. Ford passed “a lie detector test.” For the record, there is no such thing as a “lie detector test.” It is a polygraph, which does NOT measure whether a person is lying, but rather measures physiological responses such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while under questioning. Basically, all a polygraph actually does is measure how physiologically threatened a subject feels during the procedure. It is actually based on a theory that is itself not even proven: There is no actual evidence that any pattern of physiological reactions is unique to deception; and an honest person may therefore be nervous when answering truthfully while a dishonest person may be non-anxious. It is not admissible in courts because it has been proven over and over again to be unreliable as an indicator of whether a subject is actually being truthful or deceitful. It most definitely can be beaten if someone knows the tricks of the test. It HAS been beaten and has been documented to have been beaten.
Do you know who would be in the best position to defeat a polygraph? Think hard. A trained psychologist, like Dr. Christine Blasey Ford.
But having said that, here’s the thing about Dr. Ford’s “lie detector test.” Ford’s lawyers have refused to actually release the damn thing. They have refused to release who paid for it or how it was conducted. We cannot even know for sure that Dr. Ford even had such a test, let alone “passed” it. And experts are all over the place doubting the Ford team’s claims.
I simply point this out as yet another example of how Democrats are utterly lawless people who substitute their lawlessness for the actual law.
Miranda wrote about Ford:
Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me. I did not know her personally but I remember her. This incident did happen. Many of us heard a buzz about it indirectly with few specific details. However Christine’s vivid recollections should be more than enough for us to truly, deeply know that the accusation is true.
But then, all of a sudden, Miranda deleted the tweet and Facebook post, explaining with this message:
Hi all, deleted this because it served its purpose and I am now dealing with a slew of requests for interviews from The Wash Post, CNN, CBS News. Organizing how I want to proceed. Was not ready for that, not sure I am interested in pursuing. Thanks for reading.
Then, Miranda wrote this (now deleted): “To all media, I will not be doing anymore interviews. No more circus. To clarify my post: I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford mentions, and I stand by my support for Christine. That’s it. I don’t have more to say on the subject.”
Why Delete It?
So why would Miranda delete her posts? Most likely, because Ford, as the Washington Post reported on Sunday in its story that revealed her identity, “told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband.”
Oopsie. Did a woman just prove the lie that “no woman would EVER lie about sexual assault”??????????????
Yes, it turns out WOMEN LIE.
Tawana Brawley LIED about being raped. This notion that no woman would EVER tell a lie about a sexual assault is ITSELF A LIE. Democrats are demon-possessed liars. That’s what “Democrat” means: DEMOnic bureauCRAT.
FACT: it’s NOT just men who lie; women lie just as much and just as bad. And we have numerous factual proofs that yes, women will make up false accounts of sexual assaults. We just had an example of this in the news as the Oregon Innocent Project freed a man convicted of sexual assault of his daughter and sentenced to fifty years in prison. Only his daughter LIED and they could PROVE that she LIED.
We have a WOMAN LIAR just in this Judge Kavanaugh story ALONE. It is just as easy for Dr. Ford to lie as it is for Miranda to have lied as we KNOW she lied. This woman who claimed to back up Ford’s story is a LIAR just as Ford is lying.
And, again, we now as a matter of FACT that Dr. Ford has EVERY ideological MOTIVATION to lie in order to prevent Judge Kavanaugh from sitting on the Supreme Court.
And to further prove that, we had yet another patently false sexual assault charge made by a woman who simply put, L.I.E.D. Even the blatantly leftist New York Slimes – after very clearly investing huge reporting resources to try to find dirt on Brett Kavanaugh, was unable to find a single, infinitesimally tiny, shred of evidence that Brett Kavanaugh had done anything wrong or anything inappropriate. Deborah Ramirez admits she was heavily intoxicated, had periods of no memory (blackout drunk), and we know she was trolling for anyone who might be willing to slime Brett Kavanagh but amazingly couldn’t find anyone even in her liberal culture.
Deborah Ramirez actually was calling Yale classmates and asking if any of them remembered anything and stated that she herself could not remember:
“Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself,” The New York Times reported.
“The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge,” the report also stated.
Ah, hell, he’s obviously guilty anyway.
But amazingly, it gets even MORE whackjob. There is no end to Democrat hate, Democrat hypocrisy, or Democrat psychosis.
Creepy porn lawyer and erstwhile Democratic Party presidential candidate – A.K.A. Michael Avenatti – started screaming that he had “evidence” that Brett Kavanaugh not only was a rapist but he actually had a “gang rape ring” that operated in the 1980s based on reports from yet another “credible victim.” So we have yet another woman who is lying, and yet another piece of toxic filth lawyer willing to represent her. Creepy porn lawyer continues to maintain that this woman and her bogus and rabidly false allegation is “one hundred percent credible.”
This woman named Swetnick claims that Judge Kavenaugh while a high school student actually operated a gang rape ring. She says she went to ten of Kavenaugh’s gang rape parties apparently expecting maybe next time she WOULDN’T be raped, according to her story, but of course she was each and every time. I mean, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and getting raped every time you keep doing the same thing over and over.
I’m being facetious here, but this is beyond nuts.
This woman Swetnick by her own account is a criminal who should immediately be arrested for her role in the rapes of numerous underage girls. On her own account, she was a legal adult, and children were being raped all around her, and she never said ANYTHING such that more girls kept getting raped.
Another problem is that Creepy Porn Lawyer’s client’s story is laughably false. I mean, imagine having a rape ring and gang raping girls at a minimum of ten different gang rape parties. The problem is that if nobody knew about it, then how could anyone actually show up??? And if anyone knew about it, then EVERYONE knew about it. I mean, “gang rape ring party” isn’t the kind of topic that inspires yawns and disinterest. But in more than 35 years, NOBODY but this demented freak woman know about them!!!
Including pretty much ALL the fellow students at Kavenaugh’s school:
“We have seen reports today that Julie Swetnick, who says she graduated from Gaithersburg High School, submitted a declaration to the Committee alleging that Brett participated in horrific conduct during high school, including targeting girls for gang rape,” reads the letter addressed to Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking committee Democrat Dianne Feinstein from 64 classmates.
“Nonsense. We never witnessed any behavior that even approaches what is described in this allegation. It is reprehensible.”
The group said none of them recall meeting an individual named Julie Swetnick.
“Brett Kavanaugh is a good man. He has always treated women with respect and decency,” the classmates said. “He is a man of honor, integrity, and compassion. These shameful attacks must end. This process is a disgrace and is harming good people.”
Ah, what the hell, he’s obviously guilty. I mean, if a billion people say you’re a wonderful human being and one Democrat says you’re evil, you can count on the mainstream media “news” report to confirm that you are evil as a fact confirmed by witnesses.
So much for Creepy Porn Lawyer’s demented client. Hopefully Swetnick will gang rape Creepy Porn Lawyer all the way to being elected president. This nation apparently deserves a rat bastard like Creepy Porn Lawyer as president, judging on how we are treating Judge Brett Kavenaugh.
Pretty much EVERY lawyer involved with Judge Kavanaugh fake victims is a creepy porn lawyer.
Let’s take Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s creepy porn lawyer, Debra Katz. You can see through the creepy porn lawyers that represent Kavanaugh’s bogus victims how partisan, how truly demonically political, these creepy Democratic Party porn lawyers truly are.
Debra Katz proves what the Democratic Party REALLY thinks about women and about sexual harassment and sexual violence in who ELSE she has represented. And she was as a good creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer perfectly willing to viciously side AGAINST female victims when the accused piece of filth was a DEMOCRAT:
But while her client’s claims have raised bipartisan concerns about Kavanaugh, Katz, a longtime Democratic donor known for representing sexual harassment accusers, also has a history of downplaying or dismissing accusations made by women against Democratic politicians — including former President Bill Clinton and former Minnesota Sen. Al Franken.
“Paula Jones’ suit is very, very, very weak,” Katz said on CNN’s “Talkback Live” in March 1998 in a discussion about Jones’ claims against Clinton, according to a show transcript. “She’s alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.”
Jones, who worked as a government employee in Arkansas, accused Clinton, while governor of Arkansas in 1991, of propositioning her for sex. Clinton settled a lawsuit with Jones in 1998. …
”If a woman came to me with a similar fact pattern, that is someone in the company above her propositioned her but only once and she suffered no tangible job detriment,” Katz told The New York Times in 1998, ”I would probably tell her that I’m sorry, it’s unfair, but you don’t have a case.” …
In more recent years, Katz also downplayed the wave of sexual misconduct allegations against Franken, who denied some of the allegations but eventually resigned from the Senate over them.
“Context is relevant,” Katz said of Franken, who was a comedian before his election to the Senate. “He did not do this as a member of the U.S. Senate. He did this in his capacity of someone who was still functioning as an entertainer.”
By the very standard that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s own damn creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer has used before, Ford doesn’t have any case whatsoever. After all, Ford’s allegations don’t even have Kavanaugh doing anything for anywhere near ten to twelve minutes, and of course, not only was Kavanaugh not a member of the U.S. Senate, he wasn’t a judge. Hell, he would have been a high school kid. No harm, no foul, move on.
But a characteristic of a creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer is a constantly-shifting double-standard.
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s creepy Democratic Party porn lawyer was caught on tape vowing that she was going to fight back against the Trump presidency, that she was going to resist. Ford and Katz are both ideologues with the identical same reason to lie and to represent lies and liars.
The last thing I heard is that not one but two men actually came forward claiming that Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations actually match what they did, rather than Judge Brett Kavenaugh. And the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman might very well actually bring this out. So get out your popcorn.
If Judge Kavenaugh is brought down by this kind of slime, you can guarantee that no Supreme Court Justice will EVER be confirmed again. I mean, even leftist female university professors are sexual harassers of men. I mean, even some of the women at the heart of the MeToo Movement are sexually aggressive predators, such as Asia Argento. So go ahead and nominate some leftist woman judge, liberal. It won’t do you any damn good. Because I can damn well guarantee you that angry people are going to “come forward” and force-feed you the same rabid accusations that you are force-feeding Republicans right now.
99% of all the sexual predators from Harvey Weinstein to Bill Cosby have been LIBERALS.
Democrats are readily displaying that they haven’t changed one bound-to-scream-in-hell BIT from the days that they re-elected serial rapist Bill Clinton and then tried to elect serial-rapist-enabler Hillary Clinton. Democrats back then refused to even so much as READ Juanita Broaddrick’s sworn deposition that Bill Clinton had brutally raped her:
“I got one better than that, Shifty,” said Ms. Broaddrick in a Friday tweet. “[Your] party elected a sexual predator/rapist as President & when the evidence was put under their nose, they refused to read it.”
She referred to the 1999 impeachment hearings against President Bill Clinton that ended with all Senate Democrats — including Sens. Dick Durbin, Dianne Feinstein and Patty Murray — siding with the Democratic president, despite multiple allegations of sexual misconduct.
Ms. Broaddrick said Senate Democrats refused to read her deposition in which she accused Mr. Clinton of raping her in a Little Rock hotel room during his 1978 campaign for Arkansas governor, an allegation which he has denied.
It’s now been proven that the Clinton Campaign actually collected data to discredit Bill Clinton’s sex victims.
And nothing has changed. Democrats tried to elect a woman who lost her election and had dinner with her bestest rapist pal, Harvey Weinstein, because she just feels comfortable around vicious sexual predators as long as they’re liberals – which the vast majority of vicious serial sexual predators are, of course.
And the #2 Democrat is a credibly accused sexual-harassing and woman-battering beast, but Democrats couldn’t give less of a damn. Just ask Keith Ellison, a domestic violence turd who easily won his primary in spite of the fact that he beats up girlfriends. Do you know that only 5% of Democrats believe his accuser, in spite of the fact that she has provided MASSIVELY MORE EVIDENCE that she was assaulted than any of the women dredging up “recovered memories” to suddenly realize that the last man they would want to be on the Supreme Court must surely have raped them.
Democrats have a vile, despicable tradition ignoring their own brutality and rape toward women whenever it suits them. This tradition of vileness is at least as old as Ted Kennedy, “the lion of the Senate,” who left a helpless woman to slowly and miserably die so he could live on to invent the vicious cockroach tactic known as “Borking” whereby good Republican Supreme Court nominees are slandered with lies by pathetic little roach pukes like Ted Kennedy. It survived fat and healthy through the Bill Clinton rapist years, and continued through the Hillary Clinton rapist-enabling years. And now we have a brand new breed of sexual predators such as Keith Ellison.
That’s who these vile roaches are.
And we’re seeing it yet again.
And we’re also seeing the literal destruction of 2000 years’ of Western Civilization and nearly 250 years of Constitutional governance in order to do it.
Tags: Blasey Ford, Kavanaugh, Ramirez, Swetnick
Start Thinking Right 
October 3, 2018 at 2:55 pm
I don’t know what can be done about the Lefty Libs. Your article does a very nice job of exposing their lies, but these people and their enablers don’t care about moral honesty and intellectual integrity.