Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

The Hypocrite Chutzpah Of Hillary Clinton And Every Fascist Who Supports Her

April 21, 2016

Came across an article that just made me start laughing.  Here’s how it ends:

The speech in 2013 was one of three Clinton made on behalf of Goldman Sachs. According to public records, Clinton gave 92 speeches between 2013 and 2015. Her standard fee is $225,000, and she collected $21.6 million dollars in just under two years. Clinton made 8 speeches to big banks, netting $1.8 million, according to a CNN analysis.

There is nothing illegal or unethical about former Secretaries of State earning money on the speaking circuit. And according to sources in the industry, there is nothing unusual about someone with the name value of Hillary Clinton being able to charge so much.

The standard fee and her demands are outlined in a memo from the Harry Walker Agency in New York.

According to the memo, Clinton requires travel by private jet, and even specifies that she prefers a Gulfstream 450 or larger. Her staff requires first class and business class tickets. And two members of her staff require up to three days on site to prepare, with all local transportation and meals included.

The memo states Clinton should be booked into a presidential suite with up to three separate rooms attached.

Clinton also requires a flat fee of $1,000 to pay for an onsite stenographer to record everything she says. However, Clinton is not required to provide the host with a copy, according to the memo.

Costs associated with her demands are on top of her speaking fee.

The speeches have been shrouded in privacy. Her staff has limited photographs and at times even confiscated cell phones. Attendees of some Clinton speeches complained vocally on social media that they were told to turn their phones off — no photos, no live tweeting.

In the summer of 2013, Clinton spoke before a major convention of human resources executives. The group had previously hosted speeches of Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, both former Secretaries of State. John Hollon, an editor for an online trade journal attended both, and tried to attend Clinton’s speech. He says he was kicked out due to Clinton’s request for no media.

“This is the only time in 10 or 11 years of going to to the annual event, which is the biggest human resource event of the year, the only time they have banned press from any speaker,” said Hollon.

There was no reason given, he says. The Society for Human Resource Management, the host of the event, told CNN: “All keynote speakers come with some requirements.”

—————————————————

There’s nothing on any of those transcripts that would ever get Hillary in any trouble.  As long as nobody who has a shred of integrity is never allowed to ever see them.

And strangely enough the same media that sent reporters to fly to Alaska to dig through Sarah Palin’s trash and published all of her emails and begged readers to help them find any dirt they could use to demonize her; the same media that has steadfastly refused to try to produce Obama’s college records that Obama for some reason spent $2 million to suppress (that prove he applied as a foreign exchange student) or the video of his evening celebrating terrorist Rashid Khalidi (that document Obama is a terrorist sympathizer); that same media somehow oh-so-strangely can’t find any trace of any of Hillary’s 92 speeches.

So 92 Shakespearean oratories for which she received about twenty-two million bucks and the mainstream media can tell you what Sarah Palin had for lunch because they have the contents of her garbage can to prove it.

They can’t find a single one of those speeches that would make Hillary Clinton unelectable when the same damn media INVENTED records when they needed to in order to falsely demonize George W. Bush.

You’re not going to know the truth about what this wicked liar said.  The media have already circled the wagons.

And for the record, even when it is a documented FACT that Hillary lied to the level of outright treason against the American people over a foreign policy scandal, the dishonest left couldn’t give less of a damn.  Truth only matters to a people capable of valuing the truth.  Which is why we’re in the mess we’re in today – and why that mess is going to get so much worse.

Okay, so let’s rephrase this in terms that liberals would instantly understand if they weren’t THE WORST HYPOCRITES WHO EVER ROACH-CRAWLED ACROSS PLANET EARTH:

She betrayed everything she publicly professes to believe in 92 times, which at least means she didn’t completely sell out a hundred times.  So you can’t say with complete accuracy that she’s a sell-out a hundred times over, unless you factor in all the OTHER damn ways she sold out, such as all the financial shenanigans of the Clinton Foundation (see here and here for example).  In which case she’s a sell-out fraud about a billion times over.  There was Haiti, where the Clinton Foundation fraud began practically from the moment the earthquake shook.  They exploited the sheer appalling incompetence of the United Nations that Chelsea described in an email in order to push THE MOST wasteful of projects to line their pockets and of course in order to line the pockets of their circle of crooks.  And let’s not even mention those absolutely and utterly detestable foreign governments that bribed the Clintons.  There’s nothing to say because there’s absolutely no possible defense other than shameless corrupt greed.

It’s just a FACT: Hillary Clinton is CORRUPT.  Hillary Clinton IS FOR SALE:

WASHINGTON — It’s not just Wall Street banks. Most companies and groups that paid Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to speak between 2013 and 2015 have lobbied federal agencies in recent years, and more than one-third are government contractors, an Associated Press review has found. Their interests are sprawling and would follow Clinton to the White House should she win election this fall.

The AP’s review of federal records, regulatory filings and correspondence showed that almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored Clinton’s speeches have actively sought to sway the government — lobbying, bidding for contracts, commenting on federal policy and in some cases contacting State Department officials or Clinton herself during her tenure as secretary of stat

Corporations are evil, liberals tell us.  Unless, of course, the corporation is something like Solyndra (and see also here).  Even as it takes half a billion dollars of Obama money and produces nothing and leaves us with nothing but even more giant debt for the people to repay as the executives fly off with Hillary in her Gulfstream and bribe her by paying for a “speech.”  Liberalism is crony capitalism, which is another term for “fascism.”  Liberalism is using the raw force of government to pick who wins and who loses, pure and simple.

Don’t expect anything but hate from a Democrat if you actually produce a damn product that people truly NEED.  I used to see people driving around in cars with idiotic slogans demonizing the oil that actually makes them go and I just wish I had a rocket launcher on me.  Now, of course, instead I see these self-righteous turds driving electric cars that require more than TWICE the carbon pollution to build than a gas car, run on energy that came from polluting sources, and end up contaminating dumps with toxic-chemical-oozing batteries.  And I STILL want that rocket launcher.

Hillary demands a private jet because she truly despises planet earth.  She demands a Gulfstream 450 or larger, because it will murder Mother Earth more quickly.  You simply need to understand: these fascists don’t give ONE FLYING DAMN about climate change, other than the fact that they can exploit it and demagogue it and make a lot of millions of dollars demonizing people who don’t spew one TRILLIONTH as much global warming gasses as these pompous pollution bags do.

And she needs all those millions of dollars explaining at secretive coven-gatherings how she’ll help the filthiest of the filthy-rich because that’s how she can afford to turn every light on and run every appliance at all of her giant palatial mansions.

Because little people need to live miserable, deprived lives so liberal elites can have everything and feel good about their service to the environment.  You know, the way Obama and Biden welched on charitable giving because they prefer to force OTHER people to have their incomes seized by taxes imposed by people who don’t give SQUAT of their own money.

It’s kind of funny: at his VERY BEST, Obama gave about HALF of what the hated George W. Bush gave as a percentage of income; AND THEN LO AND BEHOLD THAT MEASELY HALF WENT TO NEXT TO NOTHING AFTER OBAMA GOT RE-ELECTED.  But liberalism is all about the celebration over forcing other people to do, never in actually doing their damn selves.

So we reminisce on how Romney got savagely demonized for the effective tax rate that he paid; and the same people who demonized him don’t even bother to cover their mouths as they yawn at the fact that the tyrant king of all other-people’s-wealth-redistributionists pays a LOWER RATE THAN THE GUY THEY DEMONIZED.  Because being a liberal means “It’s NEVER fascist when WE do what we demonize YOU for doing!”

Moral Standards-Hypocrite

Hillary and her staff of lesbian Satanists receive presidential suite accommodations whenever they board their climate-killing private jets to sell-out to Wall Street greed merchants.  Because to flaming-hot-fiery HELL with this “we represent the little guy” crap, at least until we speak our platitudes to propagandists masquerading as “journalists” who will spread the lies to the unwashed, ignorant masses.  It’s actually kind of laughable to consider that four yeas ago Mitt Romney ran for president and his wealth was used against him like a baseball bat smashing his face by people who are completely lacking in honor or honesty or decency or sincerity or virtue or integrity whatsoever.  And the same kind of people voted out their hypocrisy.  And yeah, it’s always amazing how money somehow doesn’t matter when a John Kerry marries a billionaire heiress because it only matters when a John McCain marries a millionaire heiress.

Watch Hillary make Trump’s wealth a campaign issue in spite of her her multi-million dollar mansions in Georgetown and Chappaqua and her jet-setting lifestyle of the rich and shameless.  Because to be a Democrat is to live in the perpetual state of Orwellian Two Minutes Hate for whoever you’re told to hate.  And it doesn’t matter to you that the people you’re told to hate are frankly better than the people who tell you to hate them.

The speeches are shrouded in privacy.  Because Hillary Clinton is a worse fascist than Hitler was.  Her staff limits photographs.  Because a) Hillary Clinton is a worse fascist than Hitler was and b) it requires special techniques for vampires to appear on film.  Her staff confiscates cell phones.  Because a) Hillary Clinton is a worse fascist than Hitler and b) her unaltered voice murders puppies.

In order to hear a Hillary Clinton speech you must take the mark of the beast on your right hand or on your forehead.  Oh, and fork over $225,000 check payable to “Lucifer.”

And yeah, as often as Hillary tries to weasel out of providing the transcripts of her speeches [that she charged the filthy-rich Wall Street oppressors $225,000 a pop plus lavish expenses] under the pathetic excuse that lots of other Secretaries of State who HAVE NEVER RUN FOR PRESIDENT should first pose naked so the leftist propaganda can bait-and-switch change the subject to what somebody WHO HAS NEVER RUN FOR PRESIDENT SAID, this fact remains: Hillary Clinton is a demonstrably more paranoid, manipulative, secretive Nazi fascist than all of the other ex-officials who ever gave a speech COMBINED.

So please vote for Hellery. Because you need to do that to “upgrade” yourselves to a hotter place in hell.

Undeniable PROOF That Barack Obama Entirely To Blame For The Collapse of Iraq And The Rise Of Islamic State.

April 18, 2016

Let me just get straight to the facts.  It is an amazing thing the way Bush got blamed for the wars but Obama cut and ran AFTER BUSH WON HIS WAR and now the terrorists as a direct result of Obama’s stupidity are far stronger than they EVER were when Bush was president.  While the dishonest leftist propaganda mill otherwise known as the mainstream media has never done it and never will do it, this is an easy thesis to document:

  1. Obama HIMSELF announced we were victorious in Iraq: “Today, I can announce that our review is complete, and that the United States will pursue a new strategy to end the war in Iraq through a transition to full Iraqi responsibility,” said Obama. “This strategy is grounded in a clear and achievable goal shared by the Iraqi people and the American people: an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant. To achieve that goal, we will work to promote an Iraqi government that is just, representative, and accountable, and that provides neither support nor safe-haven to terrorists.” — President Barack Hussein Obama, February 27, 2009.  That wouldn’t have happened if Iraq was still in chaos.  Because Bush won his war.  As point 2. further documents:
  2. Vice President Biden went further and called Iraq “one of the great achievements of this administration.”  You explain to me how he could say that in 2010 and Bush be to blame now.  Because if Bush had ruined the world in 2008, what is Biden doing calling it a “great achievement” in 2010???  No, rather, Bush handed Obama a peaceful, stable Iraq that Obama proceeded to flush down the toilet with his idiotic stupidity as he failed to listen to his own generals and foreign policy experts and ruined the world.  Here’s Biden’s quote: “I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.”  — Vice President Joe Biden, 2010
  3. Our enemy in Iraq announced themselves that they were defeated (until Obama gave them life with his treason): “By the end of 2008, in the beginning of 2009, President Bush’s surge strategy led by General Petraeus and General Odierno, now the chief of staff of the Army, defeated the al Qaeda in Iraq.  I saw the transmission because I was advising Petraeus on the ground in Iraq. They showed me the transmissions from al Qaeda that they were intercepting. They said we are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.” — General Jack Keane
  4. Obama ignored all of his generals and advisors in pulling out of Iraq:US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
    By Gareth PorterWASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”Petraeus, Gates and Odierno had hoped to sell Obama on a plan that they formulated in the final months of the Bush administration that aimed at getting around a key provision of the U.S.-Iraqi withdrawal agreement signed envisioned re-categorising large numbers of combat troops as support troops. That subterfuge was by the United States last November while ostensibly allowing Obama to deliver on his campaign promise.Gates and Mullen had discussed the relabeling scheme with Obama as part of the Petraeus-Odierno plan for withdrawal they had presented to him in mid-December, according to a Dec. 18 New York Times story.Obama decided against making any public reference to his order to the military to draft a detailed 16-month combat troop withdrawal policy, apparently so that he can announce his decision only after consulting with his field commanders and the Pentagon.The first clear indication of the intention of Petraeus, Odierno and their allies to try to get Obama to amend his decision came on Jan. 29 when the New York Times published an interview with Odierno, ostensibly based on the premise that Obama had indicated that he was “open to alternatives”.The Times reported that Odierno had “developed a plan that would move slower than Mr. Obama’s campaign timetable” and had suggested in an interview “it might take the rest of the year to determine exactly when United States forces could be drawn down significantly”.The opening argument by the Petraeus-Odierno faction against Obama’s withdrawal policy was revealed the evening of the Jan. 21 meeting when retired Army Gen. Jack Keane, one of the authors of the Bush troop surge policy and a close political ally and mentor of Gen. Petraeus, appeared on the Lehrer News Hour to comment on Obama’s pledge on Iraq combat troop withdrawal.Keane, who had certainly been briefed by Petraeus on the outcome of the Oval Office meeting, argued that implementing such a withdrawal of combat troops would “increase the risk rather dramatically over the 16 months”. He asserted that it would jeopardise the “stable political situation in Iraq” and called that risk “not acceptable”.
  5. In fact Obama has ALWAYS ignored all military advice.  Allow me to quote that Washington Times headline: “Obama ignores generals’ advice on troop levels for unprecedented sixth time.”  Obama is the worst kind of fool, and such fools cannot learn wisdom.  Obama in fact has never ONCE listened to a single decent expert who knew what the hell he was doing.  Obama’s own leaders as well as the military advised him what he needed to do; Obama ignored their wisdom over and over and over again.  And the very hell those generals and leaders predicted came to pass just as they predicted it.  It is a stupid, pathetic, trivial and demonic mind that blames Bush for that.
  6. Furthermore, Bush was RIGHT and Obama was demonically WRONG:  George W. Bush predicted EXACTLY what would happen if we listened to Great Satan Obama:Bush, as discussed on “The Kelly File,” made the remarks in the White House briefing room on July 12, 2007, as he argued against those who sought an immediate troop withdrawal.  “To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States,” Bush cautioned.  He then ticked off a string of predictions about what would happen if the U.S. left too early: “It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to Al Qaeda.”  [Bush could not conceive that Obama would give birth to an even MORE vicious monster Islamic State that made al Qaeda look, well, “JayVee” in comparison]. “It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale.”  [Yep, that sure happened thanks to Obama].  “It would mean we allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan [Yep, check again: for the first time in the history of the world we have a true terrorist army that has created its own giant CALIPHATE.  We never saw anything close to that when George W. Bush was president.  That is simply a fact].  “It would mean we’d be increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.”  [Check yet again.  And since Obama stupidly gave Russia hegemony over the region, it would mean risking World War III.  All because Barack Hussein Obama is the worst fool who ever lived].  I DEFY anyone to explain to me how Bush wasn’t COMPLETELY CORRECT in his warning and Obama wasn’t an abject FOOL not to heed it.  Because absolutely EVERYTHING Bush said would happen turned out to be completely true and everything Obama said would happen under his policies turned out to be completely false.
  7. Now add to that unmitigated disaster, that totally unforced error, Obama’s “red line fiasco” in SyriaJohn Kerry admitted that Obama “altered perceptions” of both our friends and our enemies when he declared a red line in Syria and then backed away from his red line and even outright lied about having given it; both Obama’s Secretaries of Defense Robert Gates and Leon Panetta declared it destroyed American credibility; Obama’s Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said the same, adding that Obama micromanaged the Defense Department with arrogant know-nothing idiots and tried to destroy him when he decided he had to do what was right for America.  The president of the foremost foreign policy think tank in the world – the Council on Foreign Relations – said American credibility took a major hit after Obama’s red line fiasco.  As a result of Barack Obama, our enemies have been rabidly emboldened and know for a fact that the United States WILL NOT act in its interests or protect its allies against tyranny and even hostile attacks (think Ukraine, think Egypt); and our historic allies are dismayed, uncertain and looking anywhere other than America for a strong power who will support them.  Every single one of those people is an Obama appointee and even THEY admit that Obama’s foreign policy was beyond foolish.
  8. Both military leaders, civilian leaders of the military and national security and foreign policy, and numerous conservatives such as MYSELF stated that Obama’s idiotic plan to pull out of Iraq would lead to disaster.  In any valid scientific laboratory, we were verified to be 100 percent scientifically proven RIGHT and Obama and every fool who believes in Obama was proven to be a demoniac jackass who hates the United States of America and is plotting its destruction.  In August 2008, I predicted, and I quote: “A vote for Barack Obama is a vote for forfeiting Iraq, and then having to come back in a few years to do it all over again – this time against a determined Iranian insurgency.”  You tell me I was wrong, you demon-possessed Nazicrat Party liars, because all you have is a demonic delusion in your fool minds and I have all the actual facts.
  9. And as a result, I have with all those facts and evidence and history itself behind me written articles like this one: ‘The Tide Of War Is Receding’: Barack Obama Is ENTIRELY Responsible For The Disastrous Meltdown In Iraq And Across The Middle East and Iraq: Bush’s Victory, Obama’s Despicable Defeat.
  10. And therefore Iraq has been in meltdown, Syria is a shambles, Libya is a shambles, Yemen is a shambles (and CONSIDER the debacle in Yemen given what Obama stupidly said), Egypt is a shambles, etc. etc.  Obama guaranteed Iran would have nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles to deliver them to us and so terrorize us from acting in the region.  Russia and Iran are now without any question have hegemony over the Middle East.  And Israel is isolated and abandoned.  Which is why Israelis say Obama is the WORST American president in history.  And as I document three paragraphs below, Obama has cursed the world with more refugees than it has ever seen in all of human history.

I defy anyone to argue with ANY of those points.  And those ten truths directly lead to an abundantly obvious conclusion: that Barack Obama failed America and failed the world and that the Democratic Party has become the party of treason and literally the extermination of not only Western Civilization but our very existence.

You are a Democrat for one reason and one reason only: because you are a citizen of hell; because something deep within you knows that you should be screaming in hell and you therefore have an innate psychological need for self-destruction.  And you are voting that into reality culminating in your vote for and worship in the coming big government beast of the Book of Revelation.  It becomes the only rational explanation for obvious deranged insanity.

You prove what 1 Corinthians 2:14 says: “The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.”

And that is why you are blind to reality when you should see and deaf to reality when you should hear.  Which is why the words of Isaiah 28:15 so completely apply to you:

You boast, “We have struck a bargain to cheat death and have made a deal to dodge the grave. The coming destruction can never touch us, for we have built a strong refuge made of lies and deception.”

Which is EXACTLY your strategy in the war on Islamic terror that you so wickedly and foolishly deny a) is a war or b) is Islamic or even c) is terror (’cause it’s just workplace violence!!!).

This is an incredibly important thing to report the FACTS on.  Because if you listen to Democrats, George Bush is somehow responsible for all the evils of the world both BEFORE he became president (when Bill Clinton allowed in EVERY SINGLE 9/11 terrorist AND allowed them to get funded AND allowed them to get trained before Bush took office so they could attack us eight months into Bush’s presidency) and AFTER he left office.  Under Obama – who looked the American people in the eye and promised them that his way was so much better and told us that he would END the war on terror – terrorism has skyrocketed under any metric you want to name; be it the number of terrorist organizations, the number of attacks those terrorists have launched, or the lethality of those attacks in sheer death toll.  Terrorism under Obama DWARFS anything that existed under Bush.  And we now have the worst, the most violent, the most extreme, terrorist group in the history of the world under Obama.  Which basically did not even EXIST when Bush was president.  When Bush left office, ISIS was a hundred bitter guys who had split off from al Qaeda in Iraq THAT BUSH HAD BROKEN when HE WON THE WAR IN IRAQ.

Now we have THE largest AND worst refugee crisis in the entire documented history of planet earth.  UNDER OBAMA.

Somehow Obama took a profoundly and fundamentally different path than George Bush took and the world has exploded as a result: but it’s “Bush’s fault.”

Bush And This Is MY Fault

Bush's fault

But whose fault is it, seriously?  Well, the liberal narrative that a mainstream media that is so dishonest that only SIX PERCENT of Americans believe is actually credible “report” is that Bush “destabilized” the world when he invaded Iraq as SIXTY PERCENT of Democrat Senators (including Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer) supported.  Because, you see, the world was “stable” throughout the Clinton years as Islamic terrorism began to ascend and Clinton did NOTHING: such as: the February 26, 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center; the August 7, 1998, bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the October 12, 2000, attack on the USS Cole.  But particular focus ought to be on Clinton’s incredible failure in Somalia, which he first escalated and then retreated from.  It was as a result of that failure in 1993 that a hitherto unknown figure named Osama bin Laden boasted:

“After leaving Afghanistan, the Muslim fighters headed for Somalia and prepared for a long battle, thinking that the Americans were like the Russians,” bin Laden said. “The youth were surprised at the low morale of the American soldiers and realized more than before that the American soldier was a paper tiger and after a few blows ran in defeat. And America forgot all the hoopla and media propaganda … about being the world leader and the leader of the New World Order, and after a few blows they forgot about this title and left, dragging their corpses and their shameful defeat.”

Osama bin Laden and the terrorist movement he gave birth to were EMBOLDENED and INCITED by American weakness.

Just as Islamic State was given birth to by Obama, al Qaeda was given birth to by Bill Clinton.  The very first al Qaeda attack occurred after the election of Bill Clinton. And their second and third attacks were directly against the United States.  And Bill Clinton did NOTHING.

They smelled blood.  Just as they smell blood now.

But while all that was happening, America was “stable,” according to Democrats.  That is such a demonic lie to anyone who has eyes to see and ears to hear, given the fact that there was a crystal clear trajectory of increasingly bold and big attacks.  Until 9/11/2001.

It’s interesting how we had the same scenario unfold when Obama took office, but in reverse.  I vividly recall reading 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed give a statement after his capture that the US response to 9/11 was so massive and so devastating that he personally doubted that terrorists would ever dare launch such an attack again.  Even the reliably leftist New York Times put it this way:

Yet for all his professed wisdom about the United States, Mr. Mohammed later admitted that he had completely misjudged what the American response to the Sept. 11 attacks would be. He did not expect the American military campaign in Afghanistan, and he did not anticipate the relentless hunt for Al Qaeda leaders throughout South Asia and the Middle East.

He even misjudged his own fate. When he was captured in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, he thought he would soon be traveling to New York, where he would stand trial under his indictment for the Bojinka plot.

Instead, he was hooded and spirited out of Pakistan by C.I.A. operatives, who took him first to Afghanistan and eventually to a former Soviet military base in northern Poland.

Mr. Mohammed’s initial defiance toward his captors set off an interrogation plan that would turn him into the central figure in the roiling debate over the C.I.A’s interrogation methods. He was subjected 183 times to the near-drowning technique called waterboarding, treatment that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. has called torture. But advocates of the C.I.A’s methods, including former Vice President Dick Cheney, have said that the interrogation methods produced a trove of information that helped dismantle Al Qaeda and disrupt potential terrorism attacks.

Mind you, they totally misreported the entire thing about waterboarding.  For example, they got the number of times that K.S.M. was waterboarded completely wrong: he was waterboarded FIVE times, and that process was so tightly controlled that in those five waterboarding sessions they counted 183 times that a little water was poured over him.  They knew what they were doing; but waterboarding a terrorist five times was quite reasonable; so they had to manufacture and fabricate a bogeyman to make the reasonable seem unreasonable.  Hence the liberal [and therefore dishonest] narrative that we were waterboarding these guys 200 times and that it obviously didn’t work.

When it DID work.  And according to people who were NOT liberal bogeymen who could be summarily dismissed the way the left could do with Dick Cheney.

For the record, KSM’s waterboarding directly led to the U.S. finally learning where Osama bin Laden was hiding.  Obama’s own CIA Director acknowledged that a waterboarded terrorist gave up the name and location of Osama bin Laden’s courier (Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti).  And tracking that courier directly led the U.S. to bin Laden’s location in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

“The first indication that he (al-Kuwaiti) was close to bin Laden and was a serious player came from (Sept. 11 architect) Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), right after he was waterboarded. Before that, KSM basically gave up nothing. After he was waterboarded, KSM gave an answer on the courier. This put the courier on the map. That was the first time they saw that he was close to bin Laden…”

If Democrats had been running the show, we NEVER would have found Osama bin Laden.  Period.  And Obama getting bin Laden was no different than Obama ending the war in Iraq; because his BETTER did it FOR him so HE could falsely take credit – only to utterly ruin every positive effect with his own despicable and pathetic incompetence if not treason.  Because WATERBOARDING got bin Laden.  And Obama vilified and even attempted to criminally prosecute what GOT bin Laden.

Interestingly enough, for the first couple of years after Bush left office, terrorism was minimal.  Because Bush had substantially defeated it.  Al Qaeda in Iraq admitted they were defeated.  In Iraq, state terrorist dictator Saddam Hussein was dead.  In Libya the state terrorist dictator – AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE OVERTHROW OF SADDAM HUSSEIN IN IRAQ – cooperated with the United States for the first time in decades.

But just as with Clinton, under Obama the terrorists realized they had a weak, pandering coward who would not stand up to their attacks.  And so the attacks began again, and grew worse, and worse, and worse.  We’ve been attacked by Islamic terrorists over and over again since Obama took office.  But amazingly, Obama not only denies the “Islamic” part but even the “terrorist” part, claiming all the “Allahu Akbar” screaming Muslim terrorists are actually merely perpetrators of “workplace violence.”

It’s hard to directly track how massively terrorism has skyrocketed because of the profoundly dishonest way the media reports it.  For example, I can tell you that terrorist attacks increased by 35% and fatalities due to terrorism increased 81% between 2013 and 2014.  And we keep getting these reports comparing last year to this year.  So I can tell you what this headline sums up comparing Obama’s 2015 to Obama’s 2014: “2015 Global Terrorism Index: Deaths From Terrorism Increased 80% Last Year to the Highest Level Ever; Global Economic Cost of Terrorism Reached All-Time High at US $52.9 Billion.”   So I can tell you that, under Obama, deaths from terrorism increased 81% year-to-date in 2014 and under Obama, deaths from terrorism increased another 80% year-to-date in 2015.  But good luck finding anything that tells us what has happened from the moment Obama took office compared to when Bush was president.  The media won’t give you that because we’d be screaming for Hussein’s impeachment if they did.

And you tell me what you think will happen when we compare 2016 to 2015 when that report comes out in about seven months (most likely right after the election).

Meanwhile, Barack Obama has our warriors walking around in women’s high heels. I kid you not.  Because he is not merely morally insane; he is truly evil.

Seriously, what do you think Islamic State thinks of this image:

soldiers high heels

Do you seriously NOT think this is part of their recruiting, that America is such a wicked – and WEAK – place, that even our WARRIORS are weak, pathetic, effeminate females?  They’ve been wiping our faces with FECAL matter, and we’re strutting around in women’s shoes???

For Obama, our military has nothing to DO with our defense; this man literally WANTS us defenseless as a people (hence the hatred of the 2nd Amendment) and as a nation (hence his contempt for the military).  For Obama, the military is nothing short of a cultural laboratory, where the left can impose their hateful values on a people who have signed away their liberties over to the commander-in-chief to serve their country.  Obama has cynically exploited their patriotism and forced them to do things they would NEVER have otherwise done.

So Obama has been hell-bent on imposing homosexuality and transgenderism on our military.  What has he done for our defense?  It’s best explained by Leon Panetta, lifelong Democrat and Obama appointee to head the CIA:

“Facing such large reductions, we would have to reduce the size of the military sharply. Rough estimates suggest after 10 years of these cuts, we would have the smallest ground force since 1940, the smallest number of ships since 1915, and the smallest Air Force in its history.”

Here are the facts which even the leftist Politifact acknowledges are true:

This is the lowest number of soldiers since 1940. Before the draft went into effect later that year, there were about 264,000 troops in the Army.

Turning to the Navy, there are currently 289 deployable battle force ships. According to the quadrennial review, there will be an estimated fleet of 234 ships in Fiscal Year 2019.

That is the lowest number of ships since 1915 — two years before the United States got involved in World War I.  That year, the Navy had 231 deployable ships. In 2016, it jumped up to 245 ships.

But these leftist fools precede to tell us with actual straight faces that technology never existed before Obama.  As if when Bush was president we were living in caves afraid of fire, but Obama has led our military into the glorious light such that one ship under Obama is more powerful than all the ships in the fleet under Bush.  It is ASANINE and only the worst kind of fools believe it.

Let me ask a common-damn-sense question: if the leftist thesis is true – and just one ship under Obama and one soldier under Obama and one plane under Obama is so  much more powerful than anything that Bush fielded such that we can gut our numbers, WHY IS IT THAT WE CAN NO LONGER FIGHT TWO WARS AT THE SAME TIME which we have been able to do since Reagan rebuilt the military after the LAST roach liberal gutted it???

We’ve got the worst threats facing us in all of history, and Obama’s response was to GUT a military that was the most powerful in the history of the world when he took office.

With that in mind, now let me talk about some other stuff that isn’t in my title, but it’s just such an all-encompassing trend of WEAKNESS in the face of our ENEMIES.

I haven’t even discussed all the other myriad ways that Obama has failed the world and failed America, such as his now REPEATEDLY forcing the American military to abjectly cower while Russia intimidates our once-all-powerful Navy by sending frequent Russian bombers to simulate attack runs right over them.  As I write this, Russia just flew dangerously close in an obviously aggressive and provocative manner FOR THE THIRD TIME THIS WEEK.  America is looking weak and foolish and impotent all at once.  Putin KNOWS Obama will do nothing just as the terrorists who are murdering us both here and overseas know Obama will do nothing.  And just as our dismayed former allies know Obama will do nothing.  That’s why Putin seized Georgia in 2008, when a Democrat-demonized George Bush was leaving office and Obama was on the verge of becoming president.  Obama responded with Hillary Clinton’s infamous and laughable “reset” of relations.  In other words, he didn’t respond at all other than to say, “Why not seize more territory because it’s not like I’m going to do a damn thing about it.”  And so in 2012 Obama sent signals to Putin that he would be “have more flexibility” in assuming various postures in bending over America’s foreign policy to be sodomized.  And so Putin seized Crimea.  And again, no response whatsoever.  And so now Putin is preparing to seize all of Ukraine.  Because the same kind of abject moral coward who gave us Hitler’s seizures until World War II was necessary is in office in America.

Meanwhile, in the South China Sea, China is making “acts of war” a daily event, first building an artificial island in the strategic center of the most economically powerful sea lane on earth; then placing warplanes on that island which shouldn’t exist in a sea lane that isn’t theirs to begin with, and now placing missiles on that island which places China in control of that sea lane because Obama yielded control to them.  China’s State-controlled media is officially threatening America with further acts of war, declaring that China ought to ram US ships and fire missiles in further act of war.  And they do all this because they KNOW Obama will do NOTHING.  They know Obama is an abject moral coward who doesn’t fear killing US soldiers but rather only cravenly fears his wicked, vile, treasonous liberal base turning on him.

And now China is doing the same thing all over again in a different place it has seized:

The question now is whether China is planning to build a military base in the Scarborough Shoals similar to its bases in the Spratly  Islands. Admiral Harris, head of the US Pacific command has said that China’s “complex of missile sites, fighter jets and surveillance stations based on newly constructed artificial islands will give China de facto control of the South China Sea in any scenario of war.”

According to Bonnie Glaser of the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “A base at Scarborough would have enormous significance for China, especially in combination with the other facilities they have built on Mischief Reef and Fiery Cross. The Chinese will be able to extend control over larger swaths of air space and water.” Glasser believes that the Chinese “intend to dredge at the Shoal and build another base.”

THIS is what Obama just HANDED China with little more than a whimper:

The South China Sea functions as the throat of the Western Pacific and Indian oceans — the mass of connective economic tissue where global sea routes coalesce.

Here is the heart of Eurasia’s navigable rimland, punctuated by the Malacca, Sunda, Lombok, and Makassar straits.

More than half of the world’s annual merchant fleet tonnage passes through these choke points, and a third of all maritime traffic worldwide.

We will ultimately HAVE to fight World War III because Barack Hussein Obama failed America and failed the world.  And we will fight with a diminished military from a strategically far weaker position having given up strategically-critical geography to our enemies that Obama refuses to understand are our ENEMIES.  Obama has given Russia a naval stronghold and direct access to the Black Sea and therefore the Atlantic in rebuilding its Soviet powerbase; and Obama has given China an economic stranglehold over the most prosperous sea lane on earth.

Do you remember what Obama stupidly said when he mocked Mitt Romney?:

“The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War’s been over for 20 years….When it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s, and the economic policies of the 1920s.”

You wretched, wicked FOOL.

And it will ultimately cost us millions of lives to take BACK what Obama wickedly and foolishly just gave away.  Both of these countries have now proven time and time again that they aint stopping.  And by the time we finally have a leader with the resolve to fight them we will have no other choice BUT to fight them.  Because just like Osama bin Laden and Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, after our pathetic display of weakness they won’t believe we have regained our resolve to be strong.  And so we will now have to repeat the lesson of World War II all over again in terms of what happens when you give vicious dictators the perception that we won’t stop them.

Meanwhile, Obama gave terrorist state Iran $150 billion to get them to agree to a deal that was quite simply suicidal for us.  And Iran is using Obama’s money to massively increase its military arsenal including ballistic missiles from our good friends in Russia.

Thanks to Obama, we will NEVER be able to restore a United Nations embargo against Iran (Russia and China will simply veto it).  The cat is out of the bag, and it turns out the kitty is a vicious tiger bent on devouring American and Israeli flesh.

And thus Obama either intentionally if he has a scintilla of intelligence or incredibly foolishly just massively intensified an arms race in the craziest part of the world.  Again, absolutely guaranteeing that World War III WILL be fought.

Too late, the most profoundly stupid and wicked man in the history of the world seems to realize the consequences of what he has so stupidly and wickedly done:

With Russia blocking sanctions at the United Nations, the Obama administration is looking at other international avenues to rein in Iran’s ballistic missile program.

The White House insists it has all the unilateral authorities it needs to slap new sanctions on Iran for defying the spirit — if perhaps not the letter — of the UN Security Council resolution implementing the nuclear deal. That resolution “called upon” Iran “not to undertake any activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons.”

Russia insists that language is not a legal prohibition, in effect ruling out more missile-related UN sanctions. But the Obama administration, eager to calm jittery lawmakers, insists it has a number of other multilateral tools outside of UN action that it can use to counter threats from Iran’s missile program.

Obama is a weakling and a coward and he can do nothing but TALK meaningless gibberish that no one is listening to.

Thomas Sowell said this back in 2010 (and I quoted him in a September 30, 2010 article titled, “On How Obama Will Damage America For Decades To Come“:

Of course, the one that trumps them all is on the international scene. That’s where Iran is moving toward nuclear weapons. I’m just staggered at how little attention is being paid to that compared to frivolous things. If a nation with a record of sponsoring international terrorism gets nuclear weapons, that changes everything and it changes it forever.

Someday historians may wonder what were we thinking about when you look at the imbalance of power between the U.S. and Iran, and we sat there with folded hands and watched this happen, going through just enough motions at the United Nations to lull the public to sleep.

Iran has threatened to withdraw from Obama’s stupid, evil, demonic deal: they got everything they wanted and all they had to give up in return was a promise that everyone who wasn’t insane knew they would break the moment it suited them.

So they tested their new missiles and they’re threatening to walk away from Obama’s deal that Obama and his Stooge of State John Kerry blathered about with so much pompous grandeur.

It’s hilarious in its own way: right after they signed this stupid agreement, Iran accounced that it had just “discovered” a massive new supply of uranium.  Surprise.

Now they feel strong because Obama MADE them strong.  And they are joining the Russian and Chinese parade to directly threaten and intimidate us with their new arsenal that Obama funded for them:

There used to be a time when the Islamic Republic showed some discretion with regards to its regional hegemonic and ideological ambitions, or skirting and breaching international laws. At least the ruling clerics of Iran preferred soft power and were more covert about these issues.

But not anymore.

Iran’s partial discretion was limited to the period before the nuclear deal was reached between P5+1 and the Islamic Republic, and before President Obama began pursuing appeasement policies with the ruling clerics in order to secure the agreement.

Currently, Iran’s blatant aggression and provocative attitude has reached an unprecedented level, ranging from launching ballistic missiles in the middle of the day, to publicly supporting Bashar Al Assad, militarily and financially, and galvanizing the Shiite proxies to engage in war.

But Iran wants more. More recently, Iranian Deputy Chief of Staff Brig. Gen. Maassoud Jazzayeri was quoted by the Fars News Agency as warning the United States to stay away from Iran’s redlines- one of which is Iran’s ballistic missiles. Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh was also quoted by the ISNA agency as stating, “The reason we designed our missiles with a range of 2000 km is to be able to hit our enemy the Zionist regime from a safe distance.” Iran has increased its short and medium-range ballistic missiles, and currently has the largest ballistic missile stockpile in the Middle East.

Just as Bush RIGHTLY warned us what would happen if a fool like Obama were allowed to destabilize – because HE is the fool who actually destabilized the world – Iraq, Bush warned the world about the nuclear threat posed by Iran.  And Democrats running for president in 2008 mocked and attacked him for it:

“DES MOINES — Democratic presidential candidates teamed up during a National Public Radio debate here Tuesday to blast the Bush administration over its policy toward Iran, arguing that a new intelligence assessment proves that the administration has needlessly ratcheted up military rhetoric.

While the candidates differed somewhat over the level of threat Iran poses in the Mideast, most of them sought to liken the administration’s approach to Iran with its buildup to the war in Iraq.”

I’ve been warning about the fact that Iran’s yoking of its nuclear bomb program with its ballistic missile program since 2008 when I concluded in an article:

I kid you not.  Even as the Russians are basically tearing new orifices into Georgia on an hourly basis, and setting up the toppling of a previously democratic government in favor of a puppet, Iran is busily working on developing their nuclear weapons and their delivery systems.  Given their ability to stop traffic in the oil-critical Strait of Hormuz at will, and given their penchant for terrorism and insanity, a nuclear-armed Iran is absolutely unacceptable.

If they are allowed to develop nuclear weapons and the corresponding delivery systems, Iran will be able to launch destabilizing terrorist attacks or drive up oil prices to stratospheric levels with impunity.

In January 2010 I put it this way in the conclusion of an article:

When Iran gets its nukes and the ballistic missiles to deliver them (and they are very close to both goals), the world will become a different place.  They don’t have to launch atomic Armageddon to use their nuclear weapons; all they have to do is block the Strait of Hormuz and drive up oil prices tenfold, or send out a wave of international terror attacks.  Will we go to war with them, knowing that if we do they will destroy several of our cities and kill millions of our people?

In other words, we haven’t even BEGUN to see the fruit of Obama’s failures in his “man-caused disasters.”

So Obama makes this suicidal deal with Iran THAT DIDN’T EVEN MENTION IRAN’S BALLISTIC MISSILES.  If that isn’t insane, there is no such thing as insanity.

A point which Iran has driven home: Iran mocks Obama deal with another ballistic missile test

And as I’ve already documented, the most profoundly stupid and wicked man in the history of the world finally realized the consequences of what he has so stupidly and wickedly done.  Just too damn late to matter.

Iran ALREADY HAD the uranium to manufacture when Obama came to officeCNN reported that Iran reached “nuclear weapons breakout capability” in February 2009. And by 2012, they already had enough to build at least five nuclear bombs.  What do you know, that awful George W. Bush was RIGHT and every single Democrat should scream in hell forever for how WRONG they were.  It was actually ALREADY too late when Obama “negotiated” his stupid deal that has now obviously already completely collapsed in every way it is meaningful for such an agreement to collapse.  Iran ALREADY had what it needed in terms of nuclear research.  All Iran needed at the time of this stupid deal was the intercontinental ballistic missiles to deliver their nukes they could have already built at any time.  There was never any point for Iran to go all the way UNTIL they had the delivery system.  And once they get that ICBM, they will be IMMUNE from ANYTHING.  Unless an American president wants to kiss away a few – or maybe a few dozen – major American cities.

And Obama gave them $150 billion to either fund their ICBM research or just buy the damn missiles from Russia.  And what the hell is Obama going to do about it?  You know, SINCE IT’S HAPPENING RIGHT THE HELL NOW.

That’s IF the terrorists don’t detonate a nuclear bomb here first.

It truly is an amazing world we live in, isn’t it?  How there can be such massive failure and such massive treachery in reporting such failure.

 

Hillary Putin, Vladimir Clinton

April 13, 2016

The moment news of the Panama Papers first came out, I immediately wondered if the name “Hillary Clinton” was involved.

It wasn’t.  Just as the name “Vladimir Putin” wasn’t involved.

It turns out that neither name appears in the files, but rather that BOTH corrupt, fascist leaders have multiple henchmen who ARE in the papers.

You want to know what Hillary Clinton’s presidency would look like?  Just look at Vladimir Putin (sans Putin’s nationalistic desire to advance the power of his country).

Putin has been slammed for the Panama Paper revelations even though his name appears nowhere in them: you see statements such as “…the president’s name does not appear in any of the records” in the media reports; yet strangely Hillary Clinton has NOT been so slammed even though the same evidence that indicts Putin also indicts her.  Because FACT: Hillary Clinton has ties to the Russian bank named in the Panama Papers through several key associates.  And the reason this hasn’t EXPLODED in our media is the same damn reason Putin’s Panama Papers thingy hasn’t exploded in the Russian media: because America under Obama and the mainstream media ideological allies of Obama and the Democrat Party is every bit as much a fascist propaganda state as Russia is:

Russian State Media Mostly Ignore Panama Papers
4/6/2016  by Vladimir Kozlov

Russia’s state-run media almost entirely ignored the recent report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), more commonly known as the Panama Papers, despite the fact that the released documents mentioned close friends and associates of president Vladimir Putin.

Major free-to-air television networks, such as Channel One, Rossiya, Ren-TV and NTV, didn’t even mention the controversy in their news desks, while state-controlled wire services Rossiya Segodnya and TASS provided only brief discussion of the report.

Oppositionist legislator Dmitry Gudkov demanded explanations for the brief and incomplete coverage of the “Panama Papers” from the state media. Dmitry Kiselev, head of Rossiya Segodnya, responded by saying he had no intention of discussing the organization’s editorial policies with Gudkov.

Other Russian media gave the Panama Papers more coverage, but often focused on foreign personalities implicated in the controversy, including soccer player Lionel Messi and Michel Platini, former president of the European soccer governing body UEFA, rather than examining the Russian angle.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who previously spoke about “an information attack” against Russia orchestrated by the West, said at a news briefing that Putin was the main target of the Panama Papers, even though he was not directly mentioned in the released documents.

Peskov’s statement, in which he accused the West of “Putinophobia,” was widely covered by the Russian media.

Meanwhile, the pro-Kremlin English-language television network Russia Today (RT) dismissed the Panama Papers as poor quality journalism.

“Why is the West so obsessed with focusing its narrow attention span on Putin at the exception of corrupt Western leaders who only get passing mention in these hack pieces?” read a comment published on the network’s web site.

Independent newspaper Vedomosti quoted Igor Yakovenko, head of the foundation Public Examination, as saying that Russians, who have been heavily exposed to Kremlin propaganda across the media, are likely to ignore the controversy.

It’s no damn different here.  We can go back to 2009 when Pravda – PRAVDA – was hysterically laughing at the sheer ridiculousness of American media Obama propaganda.  Obama can literally weaponize the IRS against his political opponents – a truly fascist, Orwellian act that Nixon only CONTEMPLATED but Obama DID – and the media yawns.  It doesn’t matter that the IRS targeted not only right-leaning applicants, but also right-leaning groups that were already operating as 501(c)(4)s. At Washington, DC’s direction, dozens of groups operating as 501(c)(4)s were flagged for IRS surveillance, including monitoring of the groups’ activities, websites and any other publicly available information. Of these groups, 83 percent were right-leaning. And of the groups the IRS selected for audit, 100 percent were right-leaning.  It doesn’t matter that there is direct evidence proving both a political attack and the destruction of evidence to cover-up that political attack.  Hillary Clinton is SO guilty of the scandalous abandonment of US personnel in Benghazi after steadfastly refusing to answer their appeals for help before the attack and then denying it even WAS an attack in the aftermath that it is beyond ridiculous.  Just as her secret personal server created to bypass and obstruct transparency laws and which was used to transmit the most secret information in the entire American system being stored not only in a non-secure location but literally in a Colorado BATHROOM CLOSET is an obvious FELONY that ought to put her in prison.  This goes so far beyond an “email account” that it is insane; NO TOP GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL HAD EVER INSTALLED  A PERSONAL SEVER AND USED THAT PERSONAL SERVER EXCLUSIVELY TO CONDUCT ALL GOVERNMENT BUSINESS AND THEN PURGED IT TO DESTROY EVIDENCE.  Creating a secret, personal server and then using that server in a nonsecure location to transmit top secret classified material is an obvious crime.  But it won’t because as the drug cartel leaders say, “I have protection.”

The only thing Hillary Clinton can hide behind is the “intent” due to the fact that she is utterly incompetent and simply could not understand the ramifications of what she was doing.  But even there the actual evidence explodes on her: because she has been caught red-bloodly-handed ordering her staff “to take ‘secure’ information and ‘send nonsecure’.”  This incriminating event happening after she IGNORED State Department security warnings not to use her Blackberry overseas (see did what the hell she wanted no matter the risks to national security) and after she was warned that her private server was vulnerable to attacks.

Hillary Clinton told so many damn lies leading up to what we now know it is UNREAL.  Those lies began to come out when she first claimed that she set up her private server because she only wanted to use one device for convenience sake – but then was found using multiple devices so that wasn’t it.  She purged her server claiming she had personal emails with her husband (see also here).  Put ASIDE the fact that when SHE chose to combine her personal and public life her personal life thereby became public and all she needed to do was what every other official did and have two accounts.  But that got blown up when husband Bill said he had only sent two emails in his entire LIFE – and NEITHER to his wife.  The same link contains another Hillary lie, that her husband set this server up and she was therefore using a Secret-Service secured server on Secret-Service secured premises.  Only it wasn’t.  Because WHY THE HELL WAS THE DAMN THING FOUND IN SOMEBODY’S BATHROOM IN COLARADO???

Hillary’s lies are so vast and so many and so complex it boggles the mind: her initial claim was that she was using Bill Clinton’s Secret Service secured server at their New York residence.  But that wasn’t really true: because “A staffer who was on the payroll of her political action committee set it up in her home, replacing a server that Clinton’s husband, former president Bill Clinton, had been using in the house.”  Which is another way of saying the story was a lie; it NEVER WAS BILL CLINTON’S SERVER.  It was set up FOR her by someone on her political action committees’ payroll.  And then she moved the server which she installed to bypass the law offsite.

There was that moment when President Obama made a joke that really ought to expose how blatant Hillary Clinton’s entire scheme was from the beginning: “Hillary has a server in her house! I didn’t even know you could have one of those.”  Because no public official had ever gone so far to deceive before.

This woman has been a rabid pathological liar her entire adult life.  She lies about everything, little things and big things alike.  Lies are always all around her; her soul swims in lies.

Today she claims she is the living embodiment of defending women; but when it mattered she was laughing over her trick in getting the rapist of a twelve-year-old girl completely off the hook.  When it mattered she was at the head of a campaign to destroy the credibility of all the women who came forward detailing incredibly inappropriate behavior from her husband while maintaining instead that Bill’s disgusting behavior toward woman after woman was “a vast, right wing conspiracy.”

I could literally spend the rest of the article detailing nothing but one massive criminal coverup after another one.  But I’m just screaming in a hurricane.

Because we have the same kind of media here that Russia has.

Even back in the Soviet days, intelligent Russians were amazed at the US media deception and how effective it was here to a gullible public that just ate it up thinking it was actual news the way goldfish in the ponds in front of the doors of family restaurant eat up children’s spit thinking it was actual food.  “A Soviet correspondent once said of the American mainstream media, “I have the greatest admiration for your propaganda. Propaganda in the West is carried out by experts who have had the best training in the world — in the field of advertizing — and have mastered the techniques with exceptional proficiency … Yours are subtle and persuasive; ours are crude and obvious … I think that the fundamental difference between our worlds, with respect to propaganda, is quite simple. You tend to believe yours … and we tend to disbelieve ours.”

And we are therefore on the verge of electing the same sort of leader Russia has.

And the cases in point are now way, WAY beyond legion.

The Clinton System is as identical as the Putin System could possible by in the American economy.  You have 200 donors to the Clinton Foundation who were at the same time lobbying the Clinton State Department. You’ve got more than a thousand foreign donors whose names were NOT disclosed by the Clinton Foundation.  You’ve got them refilling their taxes after massive, widespread irregularities were discovered. A whopping SIX YEARS’ of tax returns.

Bernie Sanders is making the clearly accurate case that Hillary Clinton gave speech after speech to Wall Street power players who were paying upwards of a quarter of a million dollars per speech. And that if her damn speeches were that great that they were worth that kind of money, well, the world ought to hear her prices wisdom.  But don’t worry; those speeches will NEVER come to the light of day because if they did the candidate these Wall Street players bought and paid for will never get to do their bidding.  Hillary dishonestly says she’ll release the transcripts (I’d prefer the actual recordings anyway for obvious reasons) when her rivals release theirs; so her only opponent Bernie Sanders released all ZERO speeches he’s given to Wall Street.  Because Wall Street doesn’t even WANT to hear what Bernie has to say to them, let alone pay him a quarter million dollars a pop to hear it.

You want to claim that Hillary Clinton actually CARES about poor people with her reptilian heart?  Just consider the pure, unforgivable coldness she demonstrated toward the people of Haiti when her Foundation came in to save the day but in reality set up a pay-to-play system

Development banks are the butt of jokes among economists because while they claim to fight poverty they are mostly good at empire building. The same might be said of the Clintons in Haiti. A few months after Hillary Clinton became secretary of state in 2009, Bill Clinton was named the U.N. special envoy to Haiti. That gave the Clintons a lot of power over U.S. foreign-aid decisions in the small country.

They accumulated more influence after the 2010 earthquake, when Bill was named co-chair of the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission. The State Department began directing parties interested in competing for Haiti contracts to the Clinton Foundation. Being on the right side of Bill matters if you want to benefit from U.S. foreign aid destined for Haiti.

The scandals are UNREAL.  But to the extent they are even reported at all they are “reported” with an attempt to fabricate a yawn-response by the hopelessly deceived American public.

It is beyond amazing how fascist hypocrite Democrats truly are.  Bernie Sanders is running on a government for the people rather than for the big donors.  And there is literally no human being on earth today who is more FILTHY in crony-capitalist fascist self-benefitting trading of power-for-favors than Hillary Clinton.  But they will eagerly vote for the very thing they will tell you with straight faces that they claim to most despise.

So I saw this and just found it interesting:

The Panama Papers Are Exactly Why Hillary Clinton Can’t Be President
By Robert Tracinski
April 8, 2016

The revelations from the Panama Papers—leaked documents from a secretive Panamanian law firm that helps political elites hide their money—have been hitting home across the world, exposing the widespread corruption of world leaders and their hangers-on.

It ought to hit here, too, because it reminds us of everything that should give us the heebie-jeebies about Hillary Clinton.

The Panama Papers have simply confirmed everything we already pretty much knew. This is just the way things work in much of the world. Clawing your way into high political office means that you have a lot special of favors to give out, contracts to distribute, land and timber and shipping deals to approve, and so on. So you dole them out to friends, relatives, and backers—and they naturally show their gratitude by kicking some of it back to you. And if you don’t officially get rich—well, mi casa es su casa, what’s a little sharing between friends? This has long been Vladimir Putin’s method. “In 2010, US diplomatic cables suggested Putin held his wealth via proxies. The president formally owned nothing, they added, but was able to draw on the wealth of his friends, who now control practically all of Russia’s oil and gas production and industrial resources.” The Panama Papers shed light on the fortune of Putin’s old friend Sergei Roldugin, who has somehow amassed billions as an obscure classical musician. Putin knows how easy it is for corrupt officials to live like kings without officially owning anything, because that’s the way things worked in the good old days of the Soviet Union.

In most of the world, this is known and more or less accepted as the way things work. But not traditionally in the US and in the developed countries of the West, where our governments have been structured, either from the beginning or over many years of civil service reforms, to prevent corruption and conflicts of interest. So when they are exposed, it’s a major scandal. That’s why they’re pretty much ignoring the Panama Papers in Moscow, but in Iceland, crowds swarmed Raykjavik and forced the resignation of the prime minister.

And that confronts us with a question: do we want Panama here?

Because a couple of other names pop up in the Panama Papers, including those of a few well-known associates of Hillary Clinton: longtime Democratic Party fixers John and Tony Podesta and Clinton sycophant Sydney Blumenthal. And why not? Hillary Clinton has been up to her neck in crony deals from the very beginning. All the way back in 1978, for example, she indulged a sudden mania for trading cattle futures, from which she made just shy of $100,000 in less than a year—a lot more money back then than it is now, and a whole lot for a young couple like the Clintons. She has shown no interest in commodities trading since, which is surprising considering how successful she was at it. But maybe not so surprising when you consider that her trades back then were made under the guidance of an attorney who worked for a large company that just happened to be regulated by her husband. Gee, that almost looks like a bribe.

That’s the kind of thing that’s all over the Panama Papers, and it’s what Hillary Clinton has been doing forever. It’s how the Clintons suddenly made $100 million in the first few years after leaving the White House, with nothing to offer the business world but their political connections. It’s why the Clinton Foundation got massive donations from Russian businessmen with deals that required State Department approval.

The problem is wider than Hillary Clinton, of course. Donald Trump has openly bragged about his role in this system from the other end, as the businessman who buys the influence of politicians. Even Bernie Sanders, who has been making hay from the Panama Papers, advocates a much bigger role for government, particularly in regulating international trade—which is precisely the kind of playground for corruption revealed by the Panama Papers. Only Ted Cruz, despite playing footsie with protectionism during the South Carolina primary, advocates a smaller role for government in picking winners and losers in the economy.

The fact is that the reason official corruption is rampant across much of the world is not just that they have insufficient civil service reforms. It’s because their governments have vast, arbitrary powers. Hillary Clinton is one of the most visible reminders of this kind of wheeling and dealing among the global elites—and she presents us with the prospect of bringing the whole sordid system back from Panama and straight into the Oval Office.

As bad as Bernie Sanders would be – Barack Obama didn’t just enrage the American people beyond capacity that he gave us Donald Trump; he broke any and all confidence in the entire system that he gave us OPENLY SOCIALIST Bernie Sanders as well – if the GOP doesn’t win, I hope Bernie does.  Because Hillary Clinton is just nakedly evil in absolutely everything she thinks and does.

I see Hillary Clinton’s campaign slogan –

– And viscerally see that a vote for the Democrat Party isn’t a vote for “Hil,” it’s a vote for HELL.

Hillary Clinton is the very same sort of paranoid, power-hungry, fascist thug that Vladimir Putin is.  She has manipulated her entire life lusting for the power that Putin has.  And she’s on the verge of that power because to be a Democrat today is to be the same sort of pathologically dishonest hypocrite that their mistress has revealed herself to be.

Obama’s reverend for 23 years summed it up beautifully: “God DAMN America!”  You just keep voting for it, America.  Because God Almighty will see to it that you get everything you voted for and then some.

If Democrats Weren’t Dishonest Hypocrites, They Would Spread The Orwellian Body Camera Wealth To All THEIR Sacred Cow Jobs

April 6, 2016

I came across this article and the sheer, common-sense logic and the gigantic hypocrisy of the left flabbergasted me:

Body cameras have become the solution of the day for stomping out discriminatory behavior against minorities by police officers. Cameras provide a neutral record of events, so we have a better idea what happened during an encounter. Some research even suggests that the presence of body cameras steeply reduce the use of force by officers and the number of citizens’ complaints.

But that raises a question: what’s to limit this type of solution only to police officers? It’s a slippery slope to an Orwellian future, where Big Brother could be watching all of us — for our own good, of course.

Consider health care, another interaction which produces potentially life-or-death outcomes. In general, African Americans and other people of color receive inferior medical treatment, leading to higher death rates. David R. Williams, a professor of public health at Harvard, who has researched this issue writes that blacks and other minorities receive fewer diagnostic tests, fewer treatments, and overall poorer-quality care — even after adjusting for variations in insurance, facilities, and seriousness of illness.

Leaving aside patient outcomes, there are also highly credible accusations that medical staff have groped and sexually abused sedated patients. Body cameras on doctors and nurses might well prevent such incidents, or provide evidence if they did occur.

If the doctor’s office is off-limits, what about the classroom?

U.S. Department of Education data shows that black students are suspended or expelled at rates three times higher than whites, even though no studies examining the relationship between race, behavior and suspension have proven that black students misbehave more often. Currently, parents who insist their children are innocent or are being excessively punished for minor offenses have no evidence.

Make teachers wear body cameras, and parents would see and hear exactly what the teacher heard and saw. An overreaction? Keep in mind, a growing body of evidence shows that school punishments do long-term damage Students who are expelled or suspended are less likely to graduate, and more likely to end up involved with the criminal justice system.

Perhaps even our politicians should be required, by law, to wear body cameras at all campaign and fundraising events while they’re in, or running for, office. If that sounds unnecessary, recall that it was only because of a surreptitious recording that voters found out that 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney thinks there are 47% of Americans who “are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it.”

But this isn’t partisan. Personally, I’d welcome video or audio of what Hillary Clinton has to say to the people paying $353,000 to sit next to her and George Clooney at an upcoming fundraising dinner.

Sure, the officials, professionals or politicians could simply turn off their cameras — but that break in the recording log will be interpreted as evidence that the person was hiding something, and probably up to no good.

A recent article in an American Bar Association magazine summed up the legal landscape: “The battle for workplace privacy is over; privacy lost.” Employers have a right to monitor employees (provided the employees are aware of it) to measure productivity, prevent theft, promote workplace safety and so on. Advances in digital technology that vastly reduced the cost of cameras just accelerated this trend. Mass monitoring has begun where the need is critical (e.g., police stops) but also where the workers are least able to resist (sanitation workers, truck drivers, Amazon warehouse employees, and so on).

Higher-paid professionals mistakenly assume increased workplace surveillance will be confined to the hoi polloi. In reality, given the technology is available (and improving) all it may take is a high-profile incident or two. Imagine something analogous to the police shooting an unarmed person happening in a school or hospital, and how quickly that could trigger for demands for wider personal surveillance like body cameras. Already the ubiquity of smartphones has made ad hoc recording by employers, customers or colleagues almost effortless.

I simply state this as a categorical fact: IF you are a Democrat, YOU PERSONALLY are a pathologically dishonest hypocrite liar, because you support Hillary Clinton who is the FIRST government official to do all her “business” on a secret private server and then PURGED thousands of emails so that no one could see what she was up to.  But because you are just flat-out hypocrite depraved, it’s “Body cameras for thee, but never for me.”

You want cops to wear body cameras?  I want to know what Hillary Clinton is up to such that this hyper-secretive, paranoid fascist witch resorted to a secret server: I don’t just want her to wear a camera that reveals everything she’s typing, everything she’s hearing and everything she’s saying, I want a body camera shoved right up her A$$ so I can know her proctologic status 24/7.  I want to know what is going on inside “the vast, criminal conspiracy” otherwise known as the Clinton Foundation.

So since you Democrats love Orwellian fascism so damn much, let’s go for it.  Just be honest and consistent for ONCE in your miserable, loathsome lives and apply the same damn “logic” to everyone that you apply to your enemies.

Which is why we have Donald Damn Trump right now.  Donald Trump’s core support comes from liberal and moderate factions.  His strongest supporters are REGISTERED DEMOCRATS.  In fact, the primary indicator of whether or not you support Donald Trump is whether you love the AUTHORITARIAN approach of people who believe that government ought to become more powerful and be used in a more activist manner.  Because Democrat crap is going to ultimately coat absolutely everything.

So wear your cameras, Democrats.  So we can start seeing how utterly evil and vile you are.

Why Democrats ‘Solution’ In The War On Terror Will Not Work And Amount To Blatherspeaking Gobblygook

March 24, 2016

I heard excerpts of a Hillary Clinton speech yesterday that she delivered at Stanford. It almost made sense.

Almost.

There were only two things missing. And those two things guaranteed that nothing Hillary said would mean any more of a damn thing than anything Obama has flailed at in his seven failed years in office.

What are those two things?

I’ve already written about one in detail, but in short, it is this: you MUST understand the connection between Islamic terrorism and the religion of Islam. If you fail to understand that connection, it is impossible to fight the terrorists. Our effort must necessarily have four foundations: one is military, one is political, one is economic and the most important one of all is religious.

It is RELIGION and specifically THE RELIGION OF ISLAM that motivates the terrorists and serves as their ultimate recruiting tool and their source of passionate resolve and their willingness to die. If you actually think that that ground is “Gitmo,” as your president does, you are an astonishingly morally stupid person, period. Rather, Islamic State is talking about Allah; they’re talking about the Prophet; they’re talking about the Qur’an; they’re talking about jihad; and they’re talking about Islamic eschatology and their determination to bathe the world in blood so that their Twelfth Imam will be forced to reveal himself:

ISIS is consciously and deliberately trying to bring about the end of days:

In broad strokes, al-Qaeda acts like an underground political movement, with worldly goals in sight at all times—the expulsion of non-Muslims from the Arabian peninsula, the abolishment of the state of Israel, the end of support for dictatorships in Muslim lands. The Islamic State has its share of worldly concerns (including, in the places it controls, collecting garbage and keeping the water running), but the End of Days is a leitmotif of its propaganda. Bin Laden rarely mentioned the apocalypse, and when he did, he seemed to presume that he would be long dead when the glorious moment of divine comeuppance finally arrived. “Bin Laden and Zawahiri are from elite Sunni families who look down on this kind of speculation and think it’s something the masses engage in,” says Will McCants of the Brookings Institution, who is writing a book about the Islamic State’s apocalyptic thought.

During the last years of the U.S. occupation of Iraq, the Islamic State’s immediate founding fathers, by contrast, saw signs of the end times everywhere. They were anticipating, within a year, the arrival of the Mahdi—a messianic figure destined to lead the Muslims to victory before the end of the world. McCants says a prominent Islamist in Iraq approached bin Laden in 2008 to warn him that the group was being led by millenarians who were “talking all the time about the Mahdi and making strategic decisions” based on when they thought the Mahdi was going to arrive. “Al-Qaeda had to write to [these leaders] to say ‘Cut it out.’ ” [Atlantic, “What ISIS Really Wants”]

I had already written an article describing that last-days mindset and one side gearing up for an ultimate take-all-or-die war while we have nothing to fight for and literally a determination not to fight at all even as they slaughter us.

Islam MUST be confronted as a religion. Not with violence in the sense of another Crusade, but rather with verbal confrontation in the form of, “Muslims are waging violent jihad in the name of Islam and they truly do appear to have valid Qur’anic justification to do so. What are you going to do as a religion to persuade these people who are exploiting your religion that they are theologically wrong?”

It won’t be easy. But the alternative of burying our civilizational heads in the sand and ignoring a metastasizing cancer that is growing larger and worse literally by the hour is beyond insane.

And yet that is precisely what Democrats have done at this point – INISISTED on doing, in fact – as they have demonized anybody who would cite the facts and draw and accurate conclusion from those facts. These people will look you right in the face and scream that the mere fact that 99.99999999999999999% of violent terrorist attacks are being perpetrated by people who for some mysterious reason insist that they are “Muslims” is nothing but the most bizarre forms of random coincidence.

They refuse to attribute to Islam what people who claim to be Muslims and follow the Five Pillars of Islam and live out the actual words of the Qur’an to Islam; and then they just as stupidly try to argue that people like Timothy McVeigh were “Christians’ basically because he’s white.  It truly doesn’t matter to them that Timothy McVeigh absolutely never claimed to have been a Christian or to have committed his atrocities in the name of Christ or Christianity.

They hide behind rhetoric and pretend reality isn’t really real.

We did this once before as Western Civilization. It was called “the rise of Nazism.” Our refusal to deal with a clearly developing ideology of death led to our being forced to suffer tens and tens of millions of dead and a truly horrifying world war.

And this is shaping up to be far, far worse. Because the same liberals who refused to stand up to and confront a crisis even as it was clearly getting worse and worse are doing “deja vu all over again.” Only there were a few million Nazis and there are more than a BILLION Muslims and some of them have nuclear weapons now.

The left comes with the pseudo-argument that blaming Muslims for terrorism is like blaming Christians for the Ku Klux Klan. Which is the epitome of non sequitur. Because if we should blame ANYBODY or ANYTHING for the KKK, it ought to be the Democrat Party. Because fact: the Ku Klux Klan began as the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party. Which was officially revealed during the Republcian-controlled Senate’s passage of the 1871 Ku Klux KLan Act that Democrats fiercely opposed in their determination to protect their wicked terrorist murderers. The purpose of the KKK was to “to overthrow the Republican state governments in the South during the Reconstruction Era, especially by using violence against African American leaders.” In fact, “its central objective [was] the overthrow of Republican state governments in the South.”

So it is literally demonic for the people who gave birth to the Klan to blame anyone else for it. That’s one. And the Democratic Party today is nothing short of the political expression of rabid hatred against Christians in fulfillment of Jesus’ words, “If they hate you, remember that they hated Me first” (John 15:18).

But now we get to the very essence of why I say it is so tremendously vital that we DO confront Islam with the problem of the fact that 99.9999999% of all violent terrorist acts in the world come from Muslims who follow the Five Pillars of Islam and conduct their violent jihad specifically in the name of Islam. Becuse for those rabid secular humanist Christ-haters who even INSINUATE that Christianity has any racism in it, we can refute their obscene attack with the Word of God. We can point out that the beating heart of Christianity boils down to “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life” (John 3:16). We can demonstrate that “the world” is the world of ALL races and that Christ came on a mission to save ALL humanity rather than just “white people.” And it is frankly demonic to say otherwise. We can document in our Bible that God does NOT show partiality or play favorites (Deuteronomy 10:17; Acts 10:34; Romans 2:11; Ephesians 6:9). The Bible that all true Christians follow as the Word of God says, “For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility” (Ephesians 2:14). The Word of God declares, “If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right.” (James 2:8). Which is to say, racism does not come from God and it does not come from Christianity; it comes from wicked man, it comes from DEMOCRATS.

God DID separate the world into two “racial” groups; BUT those two groups were JEWS and GENTILES and it did not matter if you were white or black or Asian or Arab because you were nontheless a Gentile. In other words, it ultimately wasn’t a racial separation, but a theological one as God created a separate people for Himself and related to His people in a unique manner. And the same God who declared ONLY that one racial/ethnic barrier HIMSELF told us that He destroyed ALL barriers, such that: ““There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are ALL ONE in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28).

Christians can confront wicked, slanderous, libelous charges against them and against their faith in Christ and refute them with the truth of the Word of God.

But the question is, “CAN ISLAM SIMILIARLY DO THAT REGARDING THE ISSUE OF TERRORIST VIOLENCE????” And you ignorant, depraved liberals would be astonished if you knew the truth about what the Qur’an actually teaches. Many atheists have attacked Christianity and the Bible with supporting violence; I both refute that charge and demonstrate that the Qur’an has an incredibly difficult dilemma in refuting violence. Please read my article and see all my facts if you have any doubt as to the truth of what I claim, but in a nutshell it comes down to this: the Old Testament of the Bible (which predates the Qur’an by 2,000 years) DOES call for specific acts of violence against specified enemies at specified times; whereas the Qur’an contains universal edicts to violence that apply in all situations both modern and ancient alike. But it gets worse: because while the Old Testament called for violence, the same Old Testament promised a “New Covenant” of which Jesus Christ literally embodied. And Jesus Christ put aside violence whereas Muhammad started out talking about peace but ended up being a mass-murderer. And Muslims have something called “abrogation” which means that the latter teachings of Muhammad replace the former. So Jesus truly IS the Prince of Peace, but Islam is in a giant quandary over its violence.

And that theological violence needs to be confronted. Because as long as Muslims are allowed to think that they have nothing to do with the problem, they will therefore do nothing to overcome the problem And IF Islam and Muslims accepted responsibility for terrorism and violence and wanted to do something about it, ISIS would be annihilated in less than two weeks.

As it is, the Democratic Party, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are leading all efforts to prevent the war on terror from EVER being over – to the ridiculous extent of even denying that there IS a “war on terror” to begin with.

Just to make one more giant distinction between Christianity and Islam: As I pointed out above, to be a Muslim means to follow the Five Pillars of Islam, according to the Qur’an. And the terrorists DO that; they follow the Five Pillars faithfully. Just to make absolutely certain you understand, THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT BEING PEACEFUL AND NOT MURDERING PEOPLE IN THE FIVE PILLARS OF ISLAM THAT DETERMINES WHETHER OR NOT ONE IS A MUSLIM. Whereas Christianity isn’t about what you do, it is about who you are in Jesus Christ and it is about whether you have the Holy Spirit that He sent in you. “Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again” (John 3:3). Christians all have one thing in common: they all have the Holy Spirit in them because they accepted Jesus’ deity and work by faith and have His Spirit inside them. Ephesians 1:13 makes it crystal clear: we were SEALED in CHRIST with the HOLY SPIRIT of promise. And so we have Jesus in us, and Jesus – unlike Muhammad – was bathed in His OWN blood poured out for our sins whereas Muhammad was bathed in the blood of his enemies just as his true followers the terrorists are.

I submit to you that the only reason the world will not confront Islam with its violence is because everyone who understands anything about Islam understands this fact and is terrified by it.

So that’s one. And Hillary Clinton is as dogmatically opposed to confronting Islam and demanding they theologically confront the terrorist movement on religious grounds as Obama has been. Instead there is nothing but a hand-waving-dismissal, head-of-the-ostrich-in-the-sand contemptuous dismissal of true evil (they view it as a crime the way bank robbery is a crime) and the source of that evil (they view it as “Gitmo” rather than the Islam that it very clearly is).

I laugh every time I hear a liberal blame Gitmo. Because these idiots are actually fool enough to think that the ultra-Islamic terrorists are just peachy happy with the perversions such as homosexual marriage they keep imposing on our culture. What if we elect a woman for president WHEN THEIR QUR’AN GIVES THEM PERMISSION TO BEAT THEIR WIVES TO KEEP THEM IN SUBMISSION, WHEN THEY WON’T ALLOW THEIR DAUGHTERS TO HAVE AN EDUCATION, WHEN THEY CAN’T EVEN DRIVE A DAMN CAR OR APPEAR IN PUBLIC WITHOUT AN ESCORT???

You don’t think this prospect would frighten Muslims: if women can be elected president of the United States, then women should have freedom in Muslim countries??? You’re really unbelievably ignorant enough to actually believe that Muslim terrorists would be fine with women having power over them??? You’re truly that stupid???

Do you REALLY wonder what their actual recruiting tools are??? You’re really fool enough to think it’s Gitmo, that terrorists are somehow enraged that we’re locking up the people who murder us??? You’re actually stupid enough to think the terrorists are saying, “We behead them and burn them alive, but we are not so terrible that we would ever put men in Gitmo.” I mean, you’re actually that stupid to believe the dishonest propaganda that pours out of leftwing media???

The second thing that made Hillary Clinton’s speech and Barack Obama’s entire foreign policy utterly meaningless and in fact absurd is the refusal to show any genuine American leadership.

I wrote an article that was prophetic because I was primarily citing as my source a truly prophetic article titled “Brave Old World” by Victor Davis Hanson. People like us have wisdom that comes from above, comes from GOD, that the left in their anti-supernaturalist and anti-religious and anti-Christian mindset simply cannot see or comprehend. Hanson ends his article by warning:

If we flee Iraq and call off the war on terror, Islamic jihadists will regroup, not disband. And when the Russians attack the next democracy, they won’t listen to the United Nations, the European Union or Michael Moore.

Brace yourself — we may be on our way back to an old world, where the strong do as they will, and the weak suffer as they must.

Which is of course exactly what has happened. Including the damn part about a resurgent, uber-aggressive RUSSIA.

I want you to realize that I speak the truth on that last part: Obama firmly decreed that Assad must go from Syria. Russia said absolutely not. And Russia did what Obama would not do and sent his troops in and literally intimidated the United States out of being where it had previously always been and had successfully kept Russia from being. Obama literally INVITED Russia in, but Russia went into Syria for one purpose and one purpose only: NOT to bomb Islamic State, but to bomb the pro-American forces that America had encouraged and even trained to fight Assad.

Putin and Russia succeeded in their mission: RIGHT IN OBAMA’S AND AMERICA’S HUMILIATED FACE.

Here is what the prestigious journal Defense News says in its analysis:

Considering the resources expended, Russia’s operation in Syria has been labeled by many analysts to have been a great success for Putin. He entered the conflict with clear goals and significantly altered the facts on the ground by saving Assad from an imminent defeat. He also bolstered Russia’s air base in Latakia and a naval facility in the port of Tartus. By withdrawing when he did, Putin looked victorious, but he also is leaving all options on the table.

FACT: Obama has been consistently saying since 2011 that Assad must step down from power in Syria. Obama was blathering the same bold-sounding line as late as November 2015. Of the two leaders of Russia and America, one was a strong, dominant, aggressive force ready to project will, and the other was a timid, weak, pathetic coward who backed down and submitted to the other.

Obama brazenly said that Putin and Russia would be marginalized on the world stage. Now Russia is the one who is in command and Obama who is literally left passively sitting at a baseball game in Cuba when the terrorists attack Brussels and a strong leader is required.

And now when our allies go to the strong, dominant power in the Middle East, they go to RUSSIA and IGNORE America and Obama. Saudi Arabia and Jordan used to be firmly on the side of the United States against the Soviet sphere. Now they’ve gone to Russia. Egypt used to be an American ally opposed to Russia. Now they too have abandoned us because Obama is a weak man who will do nothing to help them and they need to turn elsewhere. Because due to our refusal to get involved and fight, we truly don’t matter. Even Israel has turned away from the United States and toward Russia because Barack Hussein Obama stabbed them in the heart too many times and they know with a dread certitude that they absolutely cannot trust in or rely upon the United States to lift a finger to help them.

Barack Obama is a pure, rabid ideologue and nothing else: the only people on EARTH Obama will stand up to and fight – and fight to the death and to the last dead American – is the Republicans. He will fight Republicans to the death, to the bitter end, amid the dust and ashes of the republic. He will sit next to tyrants and watch baseball games in communist regimes that support terrorism.

And so in 2009 – with Hillary Clinton’s help, fwiw – Obama sought to “reset” relations with our historic opponent Russia. And Obama succeeded wildly, as long as “success” be defined in terms of Russia’s goals and prestige and power at the expense of America’s goals and prestige and power. We lost the reset, Russia won.

So, for example, after Russia invaded and brutally annexed Ukraine the identical same way that Hitler did his annexing and no one did a damn thing to stop it but spout cheap talk the way Obama did, Obama gave one of his infinite speeches and said this a year ago now:

“And that’s why Russia’s violation of international law, its assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, must be met with condemnation, not because we’re trying to keep Russia down, but because the principles that have meant so much to Europe and the world must be lifted up.

Over the last several days, the United States, Europe and our partners around the world have been united in defense of these ideals and united in support of the Ukrainian people. Together, we’ve condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and rejected the legitimacy of the Crimean referendum. Together, we have isolated Russia politically, suspending it from the G-8 nations and downgrading our bilateral ties. Together, we are imposing costs through sanctions that have left a mark on Russia and those accountable for its actions.

And if the Russian leadership stays on its current course, together, we will ensure that this isolation deepens. Sanctions will expand, and the toll on Russia’s economy, as well as its standing in the world, will only increase.

And meanwhile, the United States and our allies will continue to support the government of Ukraine as they chart a democratic course. Together, we are going to provide a significant package of assistance that can help stabilize the Ukrainian economy and meet the basic needs of the people.” – Barack Obama

But due to Obama’s weakness, Russia is now more dominant, more powerful and more NON-isolated than it has ever been since its most dominant days of the U.S.S.R.

Whereas Obama’s appalling weakness and gutless “hands-off” approach in that very theater of Ukraine stunned and appalled even DEMOCRATS:

The approach has drawn criticism not only from Republican adversaries, but also from ranking figures in the Democratic foreign policy establishment, who are pushing ever harder for the White House to do more to stop what they consider the biggest threat to European security since the Cold War.

The split was clear this month, when a group of former senior members of the Obama and Clinton administrations, among others, called on Obama to begin sending weapons and ammunition to Kiev to help government forces fight the Russia-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine.

We’re not going to do anything. And the entire world KNOWS we’re not going to do anything. We’re not going to oppose our enemies and we’re not going to rise up to stand with our friends. That was Bush’s America. That was Reagan’s America. That was the strong, powerful, courageous America that elected Republicans. That America is dead and gone.

And that is why America really, truly doesn’t matter any more.

So Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are spouting their speeches – albeit it in Obama’s case from the luxury deck of a baseball field in Cuba because he is so marginalized and so isolated and so useless that he has nothing whatsoever to do when a significant European ally and member of NATO is attacked by vicious terrorists – and saying that the world needs to come together and unite, “we” need to stand against terror, blah-blah-blah.

But everyone knows that “we” won’t do a damn actual THING.

So look at the reality just since Obama was reelected (you know, having told Vlidimir Putin he would be “more flexible” to betraying America):

2012-2013:

The number of deaths from terrorism increased by 61% between 2012 and 2013, a study into international terrorism says.

There were nearly 10,000 terrorist attacks in 2013, a 44% increase from the previous year, the Global Terrorism Index 2014 report added.

2013-2014:

32,658 people were killed by terrorism in 2014 compared to 18,111 in 2013: the largest increase ever recorded

2014-2015: the report hasn’t come out yet, but does anybody really honestly believe things have gotten better???

Now when we’re just finding out that Islamic State has dispatched more than 5,000 trained terrorists who have fought for ISIS and have now returned to fight for ISIS in Europe to hit targets in coordinated waves, it hasn’t. And it won’t.

But you read these facts, and then you come upon one of those impossible Obama statements that just shows you how pathologically ignorant and how truly dangerous his ignorance makes him:

[T]he truth of the matter is that for all the challenges we face, all the problems that we have, if you had to be — if you had to choose any moment to be born in human history, not knowing what your position was going to be, who you were going to be, you’d choose this time. The world is less violent than it has ever been. It is healthier than it has ever been. It is more tolerant than it has ever been. It is better fed then it’s ever been. It is more educated than it’s ever been. — Barack Obama, June 11, 2014

For the record, just on that last, the most vicious terrorist group in terms of sheer murder is Boko Haram. Boko Haram means “Fake [i.e. Western] education is forbidden.” No we’re not more educated than we’ve ever been; we’re more INDOCTRINATED and PROPAGANDIZED than we’ve ever been. And if Obama himself weren’t so stupid and so ignorant, he wouldn’t have ever said something so obviously completely false.

You just have to marvel at the destructive power of liberalism on the human brain.

Obama and the Democrats running to take his job give the same speech every time there’s a massive terrorist attack. And then they do NOTHING. And then the next attack comes along, and they give the same damn speech. And again do nothing. And so on, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.

And to the extent that Obama is bothering to do ANYTHING, he is committing the very worst folly of Vietnam: gradualization. He doesn’t want to do this; he’s being dragged into it against his will by reality; and he doesn’t have any kind of

We will either roll up our sleeves and go in there and fight and LEAD others to do the same behind us or we will continue marginalizing and isolating ourselves. Because the world is looking for a strong, powerful leader who will protect them. And we’re just not it any longer.

The ONLY way we’re going to defeat Islamic State in their own caliphate that Obama allowed them to carve for themselves is if we use ground forces. That is simply a fact of military reality. Somebody has to go in and take possession of an area. Especially when the enemy has the very easy and simple option of locating in dense civilian population zones and then daring us to indiscriminately kill women and children with airstrikes. But if the United States isn’t willing to commit troops, then no one else will. It is as simple as that. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton can spout all the gibberish they want to, but none of their words will make any more of a difference than Obama’s meaningless, empty, trivial words have made.

And the only way we’ll become “it” again is if we vote Republican.

Here is a list of terrorist attacks from Islamic jihadists just in 2015. Note, it’s really, REALLY long:

Democrats Truly Are Nazis, Or How The Left Actually Started Turning Me Into A Trump Supporter.

March 14, 2016

Now that Democrats have officially thrown the 1st Amendment into the toilet bowl along with the 2nd Amendment, where do you go???

Trump is an interesting study.  I mean, liberals love to blame Republicans and conservatives for this guy, but that is NOT accurate according to the polling data. Trump has as much of a liberal and moderate base as he has a conservative one.  And only 13 percent of his supporters label themselves as “very conservative.”  Mother Jones – a leftist publication – supports that last fact, and points out in its title that Trump’s supporters are “not all that conservative.”  According to the Los Angeles Times, Trump’s support comes largely from blue collar working class voters.

One writer is very aware that Trump has been winning big in the crossover states with open primaries where Democrats can vote, while Cruz has been winning the closed Republican primaries.  He actually warns Democrats that they might find themselves weeping through the tune “Hail to the Chief.”

I think the most insightful study of Trump supporters comes from Politico, which discovered that THE number one determinator as to whether you are a Trump supporter or not is your support for authoritarianism.

For the record, I am NOT pro-Trump OR pro-authoritarian.  I am a conservative.  I have cast my lot with Ted Cruz(mind you, I’ve got issues with this guy, too), because he is the most consistent conservative in the race.  Jimmy Carter said he preferred Trump over Cruz because “Trump is malleable”:

“The reason is, Trump has proven already he’s completely malleable,” Carter explained. “I don’t think he has any fixed [positions] he’d go the White House and fight for. On the other hand, Ted Cruz is not malleable. He has far-right wing policies he’d pursue if he became president.”

I don’t want somebody who is “malleable.”  I want somebody who is CONSERVATIVE.  Conservatism is limited government, particularly at the federal level, laissez faire free enterprise markets, individual responsibility and individual freedom.

I haven’t made my feelings about Donald Trump too much of a secret on this blog, as this article ought to demonstrate.

But the thing about voting is you often have to choose between two or more flawed people and decide which is least flawed and therefore most fit (or, the least UNFIT) to represent you, your district, your state and your nation.

Every free man has a duty to vote.  Because anyone who doesn’t bother to vote doesn’t deserve to be free for very long.  And it becomes an academic question who should be a slave quicker: those who voted for slavery or those who didn’t even bother to vote at all and got slavery by act of omission.

I have voted in every single election since I got out of the Army.  Because I saw places where there was no right to vote and I never wanted my country to be like those places.  And I’m going to vote in this election, too.  Even if I have to wear a gas mask over my nose clip to bear the stench.

And Friday night, Democrats made it easier for me to bear that stench.  Because NOTHING stinks like they do.  Nothing HAS stunk like Democrats stink since the Nazis were thugging around.

I found it interesting that a reporter recently asked Obama was to blame for the rise in the spirit of rage that has given birth to Donald Trump’s candidacy.  Obama’s reply was a snotty:

“I have been blamed by Republicans for a lot of things but being blamed for who they are selecting for their party is novel.”

The very next words in that article were the absolute lie, “Mr Obama said he aimed to unify the US.”

And I point out NO IT ISN’T, YOU WEASEL.  Not to mention the fact that like HELL you unified the U.S. (which I exposed as a lie all the way back in 2009).

Because I PREDICTED a Donald Trump would happen FOUR DAMN YEARS AGO WHEN YOU GOT RE-ELECTED.  My words on June 18, 2012:

Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit.  Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.

What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States.  And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions.  You mark my words.  Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification???  Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage.  You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching.  And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame.

I’ve said it on multiple occasions, but it’s hard to use WordPress to search for things.  But there you have it, I predicted that the same spirit of rabid hate that gave birth to Barack Hussein Obama – THE MOST POLOARZING PRESIDENT IN AMERICAN HISTORY BAR NONE – would ultimately give birth to someone just like our Donald Trump.

Barack Obama is a fascist.  I detailed that back in 2011 and at that point we hadn’t even BEGUN to witness the fascist heart of this roach.

I predicted a horrible candidate for president would arise because of the horrible president Obama has been.  I stated the EXACT reason for WHY I was making that prediction.  My prediction came trueIn any legitimate laboratory, this would be confirmed, settled scientific FACT.  And the only other thing I can correctly predict 100 percent of the time is that no liberal will EVER accept the blame for any failure of liberalism, just as the Soviet Union in its official annual reports blamed seventy years of bad weather as why their communist thug state collapsed (Ronald Reagan said by contrast that there were just four things wrong with communist agriculture methods: spring, summer, winter and fall).

Or allow me to come at this from another angle.  Elijah Cummings, Democrat Representative, in one of his pissier moods, said:

“If you would sit down and allow me to ask a question,” Rep Elijah Cummings said.  “I am a member of the Congress of the United States of America. I am tired of this. We have members over here each who [sic] represents seven hundred thousand people. You cannot just have a one-sided investigation. There is absolutely something wrong with that and it’s absolutely un-American.”

I took note of that back in March of 2014, and wrote this in response:

Well, dude, I’d say you WERE entitled to some kind of right to speak as a United States Congressman.  I’d say you DID have a right to something that wasn’t totally “one-sided.”  But that was before Obama.  Now, because of YOUR party, the Democrats, it most certainly is not true now and will almost certainly never be true again.

Hey, did the Democrats allow Republican representation in a health care law that essentially amounted to a hostile takeover of the government and therefore the private sector by socialists who were hell bent on “controlling the people” and ramming their takeover through with only Democrat votes and using all the procedural gimmickry and by just one (bought) vote if necessary?  How about “not”?

NOT ONE SINGLE REPUBLCIAN IN EITHER THE HOUSE OR THE SENATE VOTED FOR OBAMACARE.  Democrats shoved it down Republicans’ throats.   All of their concerns were ignored.  All of their suggestions were ignored.  The only people Democrats bargained with were a) other Democrats who had to be bribed to vote for the godawful bill; b) unions; and c) the health industry in order to either get their cooperation or stifle their complaints.  Republicans were entirely left out.  Just as YOU should be left out now, Elijah Cummings.

How about Obama’s massive $862 billion stimulus package that only “stimulated” the massive expansion and power of socialist government rather than the economy?  How many Republicans voted for that vile piece of legislation in your House again, Elijah?  What’s that?  Could you say that louder, please?  That’s right, ZERO.

You rammed that garbage down our throats and you didn’t give one lousy damn if it bothered us, either.

And Obama told so many damn lies to pimp that bill that it is downright demonic.

I have seen in Barack Obama the very worst demagogue in all of American history, easily dwarfing McCarthy and his “McCarthyism.”  And I tell you that Obama has spent more time demonizing Republicans than McCarthy ever did demonizing communists.

Oh, but now suddenly it’s “un-American” to treat Democrats the way Democrats have been treating Republicans since Obama took office and began destroying America.  It certainly isn’t “un-American” to take over the nation’s entire health care system on a giant lie, though.  Because that would make YOU and all your Democrats “un-American,” wouldn’t it, Elijah???

Barack Obama has so divided and fractured this nation with his über-hard-core fascist socialism and his radical moral perversion that he will leave a ruthless battlefield that will never be anything but an increasingly vicious nation at one another’s throats.  And it’s about time Republicans understood that.

Following Obama’s fascist hijacking of America as even LIBERAL legal analysts are now openly screaming about as they warn us where Obama has taken America, the presidency is a zero-sum game.  Congress no longer matters, because the president can literally invent laws out of thin air by himself or abrogate laws that were passed by Congress and signed into law.

Politics will never be the same in America again.

And you can thank Obama, the man who also was THE first candidate in history to refuse the matching funds system that exploded the race for president into such a huge-spending money pit.

You can thank Obama, the man who was THE first president in history to actually use the IRS to TARGET his political opponents.  Nixon only talked about the possibility of doing what Obama DID.

And so here is Elijah Cummings, a transparent hypocrite who actually has the balls to be angry that the spirit of his party’s hate and anger would come back at him like a boomerang.

Get used to it.  Because thanks to the Democrat Party and thanks particularly to Barack Obama, Americans are going to be at each other’s throats until we implode and collapse under the weight of our debt and our unsustainable socialism.

And then the beast will come, and Democrats will worship him and take his mark.

I stand by every word today and realize that I spake as a prophet.  There is a rabid spirit of RAGE because Democrats – particularly as epitomized in your Roach-in-Chief Obama – have trampled like pigs all over America’s political process and turned it into a raw sewer.

The hell that is America’s political climate comes out of the ugly soul of Barack Obama just as much as he gave birth to the racist, vile, fascist hate group a.k.a. “Black Lives Matter” (as long as one understands that they ONLY care about black lives killed in both legitimate and illegitimate encounters with law enforcement, rather than the 60% of all black babies that are murdered in Democrat Party abortion mills, or the 97.5 percent of the blacks who were murdered by OTHER BLACKS rather than killed in encounters with law enforcement.

Democrat Party thugs crashed Donald Trump’s political rally in Chicago from the inside.  They didn’t just stand outside and peacefully protest; they came INSIDE like roaches and violently disrupted.  And they’ve been repeatedly doing it at “virtually every Trump rally.”

From the New York Times:

CHICAGO — With thousands of people already packed into stands and music blaring to warm up the crowd, Donald J. Trump’s campaign abruptly canceled his rally here on Friday night over security concerns as protesters clashed with his supporters inside an arena where he was to speak.

Minutes after Mr. Trump was to have taken to a podium on the campus of a large, diverse public university just west of downtown, an announcer suddenly pronounced the event over before it had begun. Hundreds of protesters, who had promised to be a visible presence here and filled several sections of the arena, let out an elated, unstopping cheer. Mr. Trump’s supporters, many of whom had waited hours to see the Republican front-runner, seemed stunned and slowly filed out in anger.

Around the country, protesters have interrupted virtually every Trump rally, but his planned appearance here — in a city run for decades by Democrats and populated by nearly equal thirds of blacks, Latinos and whites — had drawn some particularly incensed responses since it was announced days ago.

Do you know WHY these Democrats were so happy?  Because a few hundred “trumped” the will of THOUSANDS.  Because to be a “Democrat” today is to be a fascist, Nazi cockroach bent on undermining every single sacred principle of genuine democracy.  That’s why.

From USA Today:

Chants of “Trump” and “Bernie” alike filled the arena as police dispersed the masses.

Joe Fritz, 20, who came to hear Trump speak, said a woman punched him as he stood in a crowd of protesters outside the arena after the rally was canceled.

Fritz said the woman landed a glancing blow to his chin after he questioned her for yelling epithets toward cops standing nearby and about Trump. Fritz said the woman was with a girl who was about 10.

“I told her, ‘What kind of example are you setting?'” Fritz said.

Fritz said he and his friend were then surrounded by other anti-Trump protesters who screamed at them before police pulled them out of the crowd.

Democrats are pure evil, right down to their damn TEN-YEAR OLDS.  I mean, what kind of a horrifying disgrace of a “parent” allows their ten-year-old to infiltrate an opponent’s political rally to disrupt it and then punch a grown man in the face???

I happened to watch the footage on television.  I saw three fights with punches thrown.  IN ALL THREE CASES, a black man started throwing punches at a white man.  And I’ll bet you ANYTHING that those three black men were Move On thugs and the white guys were just people who’d come to hear Trump speak in fulfillment of their 1st Amendment rights that Democrats spat on and pissed on and crapped on and puked on.

Democrats are people who believe that everybody else is breathing THEIR air.

Trump rented that venue for his supporters to hold a political event.  He and every one of his supporters had the 1st Amendment RIGHT to peaceably assemble.  But Democrats have demonstrated time and again that the Constitution of the United States is nothing but a piece of toilet paper so they can wipe their asses with it and then look for “penumbras, formed by emendations” in their fecal matter.

Mark Thiessen – hardly a Trump supporter – nailed it in his op-ed in the Washington Post.  After pointing out that Trump supporters are NOT forming race mobs and targeting blacks or Mexicans or anybody else, and are not even targeting Bernie Sanders events where Sanders spews the very communist party line that the United States defeated in the Cold War, Thiessen concluded:

The clashes we have seen so far have almost exclusively been at Trump events.

Why is that? Because organized groups of left-wing agitators intentionally come to Trump rallies to provoke his supporters. According to the New York Times, the protesters “fling themselves to the ground, forcing law enforcement officers — often outmanned and overwhelmed — to drag them away. They also shout and curse, making obscene gestures.” They should not be surprised when they get a reaction. Walk into a blue-collar bar and start taunting people that way, and you are likely to leave without some of your teeth.

The fact is, if the protesters were holding peaceful protests outside his venues, there would be no violence.

What we are witnessing is the latest example of the American left’s totalitarian instinct to shut down speech that it finds abhorrent. Trump is not the only speaker to be driven off a college campus in recent years. In 2013, student protesters forced Ben Carson to cancel his planned commencement speech at Johns Hopkins University. In 2014, student activists forced Brandeis University to cancel a commencement-day speech by author and activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Also in 2014, protesters forced former secretary of state Condoleezza Rice to cancel her commencement speech at Rutgers University, declaring that “war criminals shouldn’t be honored” by the school.

What do these speakers all have in common? They are a) black and b) conservative. If the Trump protests were about race, then why are left-wing activists equally insistent on stopping black speakers with views they don’t like? Rice didn’t call for a Muslim ban, but she is just as unacceptable to the radical left as Trump.

In other words, this has nothing whatsoever to do with Trump being a racist or anything else; this has EVERYTHING to do with the left being Nazi and shutting down free-speech wherever and whenever it likes just because the demons that inhabit their wicked souls scream inside them whenever they hear anything that doesn’t suit their Stalinist party ideology.  Condoleezza Rice was a decent black woman who was screamed down by these same Nazi thugs practicing the same damn Nazi tactics.  Ayaan Hirsi Ali is not only African, but a VICTIM of sexual butchery against women; and she doesn’t have the right to speak, either.

So Donald Trump was screamed down in Chicago.  And it occurs to think of “Chicago values” that help to explain that despicable phenomenon in which one group of people feel they have a right to trample on the rights of another group of people and usurp their constitutional right to peaceably assemble (you know, without a bunch of Nazis showing up) in what used to be America.

It truly shouldn’t surprise that the Democrat-owned-and-operated murder capital of America is the same place where such Nazi values as the desire to break up political rallies reigns supreme.

Donald Trump is a bad man.  But what Democrats are doing is so profoundly ANTI-democratic that you literally have to go back to the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany to see a parallel:

In September 1921, Hitler formed the paramilitary SA (Sturmabteilung) or storm troopers. The SA protected Nazi party meetings and broke up opponents’ political meetings.

And today we have Move On.org and Barnie Sanders supporters serving the same damn god the same damn way.

It is a savage crime against democracy and any democratic process to break up a political rally.  Period.

Democrats are Nazis.  They are pure, stone-cold evil.  It is in their nature to destroy freedom wherever they may find it, whether it be in a political meeting, or in a religious observance, or you name it.

The amazing this is just how disgusting Democrats are by their own formerly-espoused values.

I’m old enough to remember the furor of an event in a city called Skokie in Illinois.  The ACLU took the side of the National Socialist Party of America and demanded that the mostly Jewish Holocaust-surviving residents allow the Nazis to march through their town.  Justice Thurgood Marshall was one of the justices who sided with the Nazis against the Jews.

Now, the position that the ACLU and Thurgood Marshall would have defiantly stated at that time back in 1977 was that the heart of democracy allowed dissent – even the most evil, virulent form of dissent expressed by Nazism.

But the Democrat Party of today IS the Nazis.  And they demand that THEY have rights but that those they oppose have their rights suppressed.  As brutally as necessary.

Donald Trump is on the right.  He’s not taking his rallies to the streets and going after people; NO!  Fascist liberals are barging into Trump events and upstaging and usurping the right of the tens of thousands of people who peaceably came to hear what Trump had to say.

They are determined to stop the democratic process by whatever means is necessary.

Here’s another quote of what the 1930s looked like due to the vicious Nazis and Communist street thugs and the impact their thuggery had on political discourse:

Control of the streets has always been central to fascist strategy, and the SA’s slogan was “Possession of the streets is key to power in the State.”  As the 1930s began, ‘the Communists marched in formation singing down the streets, broke up rival political meetings, beat up opponents, and raided each other’s territory.”‘  As did the Nazis.  The violence had intensified beyond control: ‘Ordinary brawls had given way to murderous attacks.  Knives, blackjacks and revolvers replaced political arguments.  Terror was rampant.’ — M. Testa, Militant Anti-Fascism: A Hundred Years of Resistance

And now, just as in the 1930s when propaganda was “the news,” we’ve got the same thing.  And the exact same Goebbels-types who cheerlead the Nazi thug tactics and demonized the Nazis opponents are at it again, doing the same filthy political work they did in the 30s to aid their beloved Führer.

Donald Trump has suggested that his followers might do the same thing to Democrat rallies.  He has been asking the question how the media would depict it if his followers were to do that.

But you Democrat fascist goons have already DONE it.  And the media only had outrage and questions for Donald Trump as they blamed HIM for the violence that leftist protesters kept bringing.

Hillary Clinton is a fascist thug in the spirit of fascist thuggery.  She said, “If you play with matches, you’re going to start a fire you can’t control.”  And she ought to know about fire, given that she did everything but set her secret server on fire to prevent any democratic transparency of what was going on in her vile State Department.

The very next day after the liberal Nazism in Chicago a rabid liberal demonstrator got inside a Trump event in Dayton, Ohio and tried to bite Trump’s leg like the vicious rodent that he is.  This rabid rat’s “defense” was to say that “Trump is a bully.”

No, you rabid Nazi roach:  YOU’RE a bully and a thug.  YOU TRIED TO PHYSICALLY ASSAULT THE MAN FROM BEHIND LIKE THE PIECE OF FILTH YOU ARE.

And just imagine the media firestorm that would have erupted if a Trump supporter had tried to physically attack Hillary Clinton at one of her events.  Just imagine the poopstorm that would have erupted.  And what we are now witnessing is what the Bible prophesied as “the mystery of lawlessness” as THE most dishonest and corrupt administration in this nation’s history refuses to follow the law of the land while their side wins and the other side loses because liberal Nazis want it that way.

Remember, that as recently as 1977, Democrats were saying that democracy demanded that the most hateful ideas must be allowed to be heard.  And now she has taken the side of Adolf Hitler in his willingness to suppress whatever idea he deemed “ugly” or “divisive.”

There is absolutely NO justification for what happened in Chicago to Donald Trump’s supporters.  Not even by the standards of the Democrat Party back in 1977, before the Democrat Party officially “fundamentally transformed” into the Nazi Party.

Don’t you DARE send thugs to our rallies and then blame us for the violence that ensues, you Nazi perverts.  You made Donald Trump the hero of peace because he cancelled his event.  And he is therefore so much better than any Democrat it is beyond unreal.

The “protestors” and “demonstrators” who are coming into EVERY Trump event are professional, organized minions of the most rabid, vile bowel movement that ever plagued this nation.  They have nothing but stone-cold hatred for everything our Constitution stands for and the constitutional protections that Constitution enshrines.

So, I suppose I should thank you, Democrat Party, for helping me to get over the sick feeling I had in my stomach at the thought of voting for Donald Trump.  Because you just showed me Fridaythat however bad Trump is, he is NOTHING compared to the Nazi evil that the Democrat Party is bringing to this country with the same fascist spirit that brought the Holocaust and has now brought sixty million murdered human beings through abortion.

I will now crawl over broken glass on my knees to vote for Donald Trump thanks to what you people did breaking up that rally in Chicago and trying to do it in other cities.  You people are pure sons and daughters of hell.

What we are seeing now is nothing short of a brutal war that the left says it will win by ANY means including the most Nazi of means.

 

 

 

Oscar White Night And Why Do We Keep Letting The Most Disingenuous And Hypocritical People On Earth (i.e. Liberals) Lecture Us???

February 29, 2016

I frankly don’t care what the issue is, liberals are THE most hypocritical and deceitful people on the face of the earth.

And the funny thing about it is, the more liberal you are, the more well-known you are for being a liberal or for succeeding in a basically-all-liberal industry, the more the above is true.

Take the movies and the liberals who dominate every aspect of the Hollywood film industry – and then flush all their PC bullcrap down the toilet where it belongs.

Here is a collage of all the actors nominated for Oscars from the esteemed leftist Academy of Motion Pictures:

Oscar Actors White Night

The Los Angeles Times acknowledges in the January 15 print edition that “For the second year in a row, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has nominated an all-white group of acting nominees, passing over popular, well-reviewed performances in “Creed” and “Straight Outta Compton” and failing to nominate prominent actors of color in 2015 films, including Idris Elba, Samuel L. Jackson and Will Smith.”

The thing I always marvel at is how mainstream media (i.e. liberal) news outlets will run a story like this, you know ONCE, and then go back to demonizing Republicans and conservatives the remaining 99.999 percent of the time.  They’ll say, “We reported that, we were fair,” but the difference is when their negative stories target the left they get reported on and dropped but when they target the right they get picked up and the long march of incessant reporting featuring banging drums and clashing symbols begins.

In the same vein, and with the same damn leftist Hollywood industry, just consider how these incredibly rich white people manage to keep spouting off about liberal economic policies as they horde all the money and decry corporate welfare while they SWIM in greed.  Liberal Hollywood takes in $1.4 BILLION a year in corporate pork even as they hypocritically hate on corporations.

Now, in addition to that, we always hear how Clarence Thomas, or Thomas Sowell, or Colin Powel, or Condoleezza Rice, are “Uncle Toms.”  Because they serve the white establishment.

What the hell is Chris Rock but the “Uncle Tom” for the liberal white Hollywood establishment???

How about this, liberal actor, liberal producer, et al: you give UP your fancy mansions and your fancy cars and your fancy clothes and your jet-set lives where you look down on all the people in flyover country who vote Republican because they’re ordinary, decent people with ordinary, decent values:

Electoral Map

But no.  To be an “actor” is to pretend to be a human being when in reality you are a leftist roach impersonating a human being.

Let’s just go on with some proof: take the following headline about Hollywood political money during the 2012 presidential election:

Hollywood Cash: Obama 16-1 Over Mitt

You think, well, that’s just an anomaly.  Nope:

Report: 90 Percent of Hollywood Donations Have Gone to Hillary Clinton

And that’s only because most of the remaining ten percent has gone to Bernie Sanders.

These Hollywood people are liberals.  They are virtually ALL doctrinaire liberals who like the fascists they are have done their own version of the blacklisting they used to so despise when it targeted communists to now target conservatives.  The same damn thing has happened to just as great of an extent in our universities as liberals – that is “fascists” have Stalinist-style purged Christians, conservatives and Republicans from being allowed to have a foot in the door of the university system.  Or I’ll just let you explain to me how it was that 96 percent of Ivy League professors’ donations went to Obama.

The funny thing is that when they were blacklisting Hollywood, they SHOULD have been blacklisting the universities, because even Democrat President Lyndon Baines Johnson was pointing out this fact:

LBJ to Sen McGee (D-WY): “They’re going into the colleges and the faculties and the student bodies, and trying to get them to send wires that come right out of Communist headquarters.” — LBJ, Thursday, April 29, 1965, 4:29 p.m.

And it is sadly even MORE true today than it was when the last decent Democrats were pointing it out fifty years ago.

Here is a WAY too-typical example just out of a university lib-roach’s “lecture”:

Do you have any idea how utterly, demonically FALSE that leftist propaganda is???  And, of course, it is probably helped by Obama’s “Justice Department” which refused to label the non-white MUSLIM TERRORIST who shot up an army base while screaming “Allahu Akbar” as a “terrorist” and so what if he had business cards that labeled himself a “Soldier of Allah” and had been in direct repeated contact with foreign terrorists?   Lust as they refused to label the non-white MUSLIM TERRORIST who sawed on woman’s head off and was shot in the act of trying to do the same damn thing to another woman as a “terrorist.”  So  what if he was screaming praise to Allah and had tried to forcefully proselytize people to convert to Islam and had violent Muslim images all over his website.  These were clearly just examples of “workplace violence,” Obama’s blatherers told us.  A few weeks ago, we had a couple of non-white MUSLIM TERRORISTS murder 14 people in San Bernardino and the White House played the same damn dishonest game.  That one was labeled “gun violence” and Obama went after the legal gun owners and ignoring the non-white MUSLIM TERRORISTS.  And of course we just had the MUSLIM TERRORIST who ran up to a police car in Philadelphia screaming about Allah and claiming allegiance to Islamic State and shot that cop in his car.  He wasn’t a “terrorist” either.

At least, not if you are a demon-possessed, morally sick leftist university professor who is utterly consumed by lies and determined to propagate them in the name of “education,” anyway.

I’m sorry, I actually think I wronged Joseph Stalin: because STALIN didn’t purge as viciously as liberal-progressives purge today.

Liberals are people who just hate bias and bigotry so damn much – unless THEY get to be the ones unleashing all their hate and bigotry.

You know what?  I really don’t need a damn NAZI telling me to be “tolerant.”  Not when a liberal Democrat wouldn’t know “tolerance” if it came up and mauled him grizzly bear-style.

These fascists have NOTHING to do with “tolerance.”  They are posturing hypocrite liars down to the very cores of their shriveled roach souls.

Oh, there’s liberals and “gun violence.”  FORGET the fact that the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of “gun violence” is from criminal members of the race-baiting Democrat Party race coalition who live in and prey on people in cities that are governed by LIBERALS.  And forget the fact that Democrats share this cherished goal of seizing guns from the population that Stalin and Hitler and Mao had before them.  And forget the fact that Obama and many of these other hoity-toity liberals who decry the 2nd Amendment and the right of the people to keep and bear arms have armed bodyguards.

So we get to other liberal talking points such as “the war on women” and unequal pay.  Oh, Hillary Clinton is a CHAMPION of that “equal pay for equal work” issue.  But according to the very dishonest statistics she and all other hypocrite liberals cite, SHE IS JUST AS BAD AT PAYING WOMEN “EQUAL PAY” AS ANYONE:  During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to the report.

That “equal pay for equal work” line is nothing but a statistical shenanigan from dishonest liars who are lying to bad people who prefer to believe lies rather than the truth.

BY HER OWN DISHONEST METRIC, HILLARY CLINTON IS EVERY BIT AS GUILTY OF WAGING A WAR ON WOMEN AS THE MOST MISOGYNISTIC TURD WHO EVER LIVED.

But every single day on the campaign trail, at event after event, this hypocrite liar is out screaming about the very issue that she is as personally as guilty of as anyone else on the face of the earth.

Just as Hillary Clinton is somehow a champion of women who’ve been raped or sexually attacked.  Hillary Clinton’s husband is and has been a serial molester of women and Hillary Clinton came to the defense of her husband every single time and savaged the women who accused him.  And it even gets worse for her when you consider her legal practice when she got a rapist of a young girl off on the most loathsome technicality AND LAUGHED ABOUT IT.

Oh, liberals love to pat themselves on the back and praise themselves for being “pro child.”  Let’s put aside the fact that sixty million children can’t agree with them because liberals MURDERED them in their abortion mills and then callously sold their body parts like chunks of meat in a deli.

Liberals tell us how much they care about the children and how much they value their education while rabidly maintaining a “public education establishment” that is an utter joke and an abject disgrace compared to private schools and charter schools.  But good luck trying to pry the parasitic fangs of the utterly self-centered union teachers out of your kids.  Your kid is that teacher’s meal ticket.  Period.  And Democrats will fight to the death of the last child to protect the last union “teacher.”

And the Democrat Party is the party of hostility to children who want to actually a) be born and b) actually LEARN something other than Stalinist indoctrination.  But such as it is, kids are pumped full of godless Darwinian evolution and global warming ideology, they’re pumped full of religious indoctrination in the form of fostering “tolerance” to Islam and harboring contempt for Judeo-Christianity; they’re pumped full of gender-bending sexual perversion; they’re pumped full of contempt for America and its founding fathers in favor of a hate-America-first campaign that could have been written by communist commissars from the KGB; they’re pumped full of everything BUT reading, writing and arithmetic.

But hey, to be a liberal means to be a liar whose soul swims in lies.  So you liberals believe your own lies and report your own lies as “fact” no matter how utterly fallacious they are or what dishonest hypocrite assured you they were true.

Depraved Divider-In-Chief Barack Obama FIRST POTUS In ENTIRE HISTORY OF REPUBLIC To Refuse To Honor Funeral Of Sitting Justice

February 20, 2016

This just really and truly boggles the mind:

Megyn Kelly stated Thursday evening on The Kelly File that she can find no instance in history where a sitting president of the United States has failed to attend the funeral of a sitting Supreme Court Justice. It’s an unprecedented move on the part of Obama, who once again fails to uphold his duty as president, represent the country and set an example for the American people.

I admit that I didn’t agree with the whole “car czar” program, but I finally agree with something that Obama’s handpicked car czar, Steven Rattner, said:

“If we want to reduce partisanship, we can start by honoring great public servants who we disagree with.”

The first American president to shirk attending a funeral of a sitting Supreme Court Justice (while demanding he be able to replace that Justice on the Court).  All I can say is  that I suppose history continues unbroken – BECAUSE BARACK OBAMA IS NOT AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT; HE IS AN UNAMERICAN PRESIDENT.

An incredibly Obama has said over and over since Scalia’s death that he has the right and the duty to nominate a replacement for Scalia.

That’s actually technically true, and all sides affirm that fact.  But Obama had every bit as much of a right and a duty to honor the Justice he was demanding to replace at his funeral.

And since Obama callously and cynically and decisively shirked that particular right and duty, the United States Senate – which has the right and duty to “advise and consent” on ANY presidential nomination, has the right and duty to ADVISE Obama NOT to exploit this death by nominating anyone and the right and duty to absolutely REFUSE to consent to anybody Obama nominates.

The SAME Constitution that gives a president the right to nominate a Supreme Court Justice to fill a vacancy gives the Senate the right to say, “Up yours!” to a presidential nomination.

As a Senator himself, Barack Obama FILIBUSTERED Republican nominees to the Supreme Court:

However, the truth is that, when they were senators, Obama, Biden, and Clinton all tried to filibuster Justice Alito’s nomination to the court – and other Democratic party leaders such as NY Senator Chuck Schumer reveled in the idea that they were able to block every Bush #43 nomination to the federal courts.

We also have the example of Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden who in 1992 said when there was just a POSSIBILITY that George H.W. Bush MIGHT be able to nominate a Supreme Court Justice:

“It is my view that if the president goes the way of Presidents Fillmore and Johnson and presses an election year nomination the Senate Judiciary Committee should seriously consider not scheduling confirmation hearings on the nomination until ever — until after the political campaign season is over.” — Sen. Joe Biden, June 25, 1992

So all you’ve got to do is just refer to this as “the Biden Rule.”  But it’s a rule and it was started by Democrats.  And now they’re screaming at us for following THEIR rules.

Democrats have a LONG history of doing the very thing they now claim is so evil:

While Democrats in the upper chamber – including Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York and former Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, both of which called for blocking former President George W. Bush’s nominations – have slammed the GOP for its decision not to consider a nominee until after a new president is elected, Democrats have not always held that stance. The Democrat-controlled Senate passed a resolution in 1960 preventing a recess appointment, much to the dismay of Republicans.

As first reported by The Washington Post – S.RES. 334, also known as Expressing the Sense of the Senate That The President Should Not Make Recess Appointments to the Supreme Court, Except to Prevent or End a Breakdown in the Administration of the Court’s Business – passed the Senate in a 48-33 vote in an attempt to prevent former President Dwight Eisenhower from filling a seat last-minute.

Democrats have frequently played this same game.   New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, now the Senate Minority Leader and leader of all the Senate Democrats, said when a Republican was president that the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

“We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”

And oh, I can go on.  The Democratic Party is the party that turned the name of a Supreme Court nominee into a verb by so utterly pouring out their demonic hate to poison the nomination that the process became known as “Borking.”  It had never been done before the Party of Cockroach Fascism started it.  This infamous Ted Kennedy slander was the worst of the slanders:

“Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”

Robert Bork was a good man and eminently qualified to sit on the Court.  But Democrats are truly breathtakingly evil and hypocritical people.

Speaking of “being qualified,” Barack Obama actually openly ACKNOWLEDGED that Judge Roberts was qualified.  But that didn’t MATTER then:

Obama admitted that Roberts was eminently qualified. He praised him highly.

“There is absolutely no doubt in my mind Judge Roberts is qualified to sit on the highest court in the land. Moreover, he seems to have the comportment and the temperament that makes for a good judge. He is humble, he is personally decent, and he appears to be respectful of different points of view. It is absolutely clear to me that Judge Roberts truly loves the law. He couldn’t have achieved his excellent record as an advocate before the Supreme Court without that passion for the law…”

But, no he wasn’t going to vote for him anyway.

“I ultimately have to give more weight to his deeds and the overarching political philosophy that he appears to have shared with those in power than to the assuring words that he provided me in our meeting. The bottom line is this: I will be voting against John Roberts’ nomination.”

In short, Obama chose to vote against Roberts because of his perceived conservative politics. Nothing else.

Republicans have the SAME right and duty to reject any judge Obama nominates simply because they don’t agree with Obama’s “overarching political philosophy.”  Period.

Democrats are abject, disgusting, despicable hypocrite vermin.  And their past actions need to now catch up to them.  They need to be exposed for what they are.

Here’s another thing: the Senate is now firmly in Republican hands (after disgraceful Democrats were caught being evil maybe a million times too often).  But when Democrats owned the Senate, they shoved their crap right down the Republicans’ throats and changed the damn Senate rules to do it with a process that was so toxic to the Constitution that it was called “the nuclear option.”

On November 21, 2013, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared that “unbelievable, unprecedented obstruction” by Republican filibusters had made the confirmation process “completely unworkable.”[1] As a result, he said, Democrats were forced to eliminate virtually all nomination filibusters. […]

For nearly all of its history, proceeding to a final vote on a matter before the Senate required a supermajority.

But not when Democrats stole the show.

Now, quite simply, they should be allowed to eat the fecal matter that forced down the throats of everyone who disagreed with them when they were in control.

The Republican majority Senate will do what the hell it wants and the Democrat minority will shut the hell up.  By the Democrats’ own damn rules.

If Obama gave a flying damn about the unity of the United States that he has so fractured and broken that on the Republican side we have Donald Trump and on the Democratic side we have socialist Bernie Sanders, he would yield in this election year and allow the incoming president to nominate a Justice with the support of a majority of the people.

But Obama DOESN’T give a flying damn about uniting America.  That was, as I pointed out only months into his dishonest presidency, merely one of his signature lies.

And Barack Obama just officially DISQUALIFIED himself from having ANY right to nominate Justice Antonin Scalia’s replacement by his pretty, cheap, and depraved refusal to honor that great man.

I think it’s beyond safe to say that were it Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s funeral, Barak Obama would have bothered to at least pretend he is a legitimate president and shown up.

But Obama is a rabid ideologue, so the demons that control every move he makes would not allow him to step into that cathedral to honor Justice Antonin Scalia.

For the record, I actually have far more respect for BOTH Ginsburg (whose opinions I despise) as WELL as Scalia (whose opinions I affirmed): because both of them were able to do what Barack Obama has NEVER ONE SINGLE TIME IN HIS LIFE been able to do; they were able to look past their differences and find the things they held in common and unite as dear friends around those things.  That says a lot to praise about both of these figures.

Just as it says a lot about just how petty and vindictive a figure Barack Obama is.

Antonin Scalia believed that “there is no conflict between loving God and loving one’s country.”  But Barack Obama is a malignant narcissist blasphemer who believes that HE is God and that to serve anyone or anything BUT Obama is sin.

The funeral is over.  Obama never bothered to show up.  Because Obama is a disgrace to the presidency and a disgrace to the United States of America that Justice Antonin Scalia spent his life faithfully serving.  And even Ruth Bader Ginsburg would affirm that fact.

 

 

 

Team Hillary Clinton: ‘Special Place In Hell’ For Women Who Don’t Vote For Hillary, And Oh, Yeah, Young Women Are Ignorant BIMBOS

February 8, 2016

It’s always funny to me to watch hypocrites, I mean liberals.

Imagine if Ted Cruz started talking about “a special place in hell” for those who didn’t vote for him.  Imagine if the Cruz campaign spouted the outright misogynist contempt for women that Hillary’s top shrews just spouted.

The feminist writer Gloria Steinem apologized on Sunday for remarks about young women who support Bernie Sanders, not long after Hillary Clinton defended Madeleine Albright over her comment that there is “a special place in hell” for women who do not support Clinton.

Steinem posted her apology to Facebook, writing that she “misspoke” on Friday when on a talk show she spoke about women who support Clinton’s rival in the Democratic presidential race, Senator Bernie Sanders.

Appearing on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher, Steinem said women “get more activist as they grow older. And when you’re younger, you think: ‘Where are the boys? The boys are with Bernie.’”

On Sunday she wrote that she had not meant to imply “young women aren’t serious in their politics”. [….]

Also on Sunday, Clinton said that the remark Albright delivered at a rally in Concord, New Hampshire, “There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other,” was nothing new. Albright has used it at least since 2008, when she supported Clinton’s first run for president, against Barack Obama.

Clinton said that the belief arose from Albright’s own long fight for equality. Nevertheless, on Saturday, hours after Steinem’s remark, Albright’s words angered some, who found them condescending, and brought questions of gender and politics into high relief on the trail.

Clinton appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday and described Albright’s comment as a “light-hearted but very pointed remark”.

“Madeline has been saying this for many, many years,” Clinton said. “She believes it firmly, in part because she knows what a struggle it has been, and she understands the struggle is not over.”

Albright served as secretary of state – the first woman in the post – during Bill Clinton’s presidency. She “has a life experience that I respect”, Clinton said.

“I don’t want people to be offended,” Clinton said. But when asked if she understood why some women did take offense, she suggested political correctness had made Americans overly sensitive.

“Good grief, we’re getting offended by everything these days!” she said. “People can’t say anything without offending somebody.”

I want you to imagine if Ted Cruz had said there was a special place in hell for people who didn’t vote for him and how Hillary Clinton and her cult priestesses would have handled it.

It’s always amazing for me how liberals exploit religion while demonizing and slandering people who would dare to accurately quote the Bible to explain how God patiently explained His positions.  How DARE we directly quote the Bible to reveal the truth about God’s views on homosexuality, abortion and human-government as Savior socialism.

I want to call out Hillary Clinton for using the spike-studded bludgeon of political correctness to attack her rivals for YEARS.

Young women support Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton by a tune of 84% to 14%.

It’s because Hillary spent years of her life cynically and cravenly exploiting the most politically correct brand of feminism only to finally hang on her own damn petard as women realized that the same woman who says that women should be believed because they’re women demonized NUMEROUS women for coming forward to claim that Bill Clinton was a serial molester of women and an outright RAPIST.  As women finally realized that Hillary Clinton took MILLIONS from the most oppressive regimes to women and women’s rights on the face of the earth.  That Hillary Clinton has been a lifelong WHORE for Wall Street and was paid $40 million for prostituting herself for them and for their interests.

I mean, Hillary Clinton has raised more than $153 million primarily from the worst and most greedy Wall Street players just since 2001.

And I mean, 2001, that’s right: that’s the year Bill and Hillary left the White House “dead broke” unless Hillary Clinton is a demon-possessed LIAR.

Hillary says, “You know, you had to make double the money because of, obviously, taxes, and then pay off the debts and get us houses and take care of family members.”  Because, you know, when Democrats viciously attacked John McCain over “houses,” it’s unfair to expect Bill and Hillary to be satisfied with just one house.

Definition of “dead broke”: Hillary’s limousine chauffeur had to drive her to the airport for first class travel when she clearly belonged in a private jet.

Hillary says indignantly that she has never changed a vote due to the millions she has received.  Unfortunately for Hillary Clinton, Democrat Sen. Elizabeth Warren remembers what an outright lie this ludicrous statement is.

Warren is on the record saying of Hillary Clinton:

“As Senator Clinton, the pressures are very different. It’s a well-financed industry,” Warren said. “She has taken money from the groups, and more to the point, she worries about them as a constituency … The credit industry on this bankruptcy bill has spent tens of millions of dollars lobbying.”

Which is a polite way of saying that if Hillary Clinton wants what used to be her soul back, she’s going to have to come crawling to its current legal owners at Goldman Sachs.

I always marvel how massive wealth is demonized … unless the Democrat who is running for president happens to be filthy freaking rich the way Hillary Clinton is this year or John Kerry was filthy rich in 2004.  But don’t worry, abject hypocrisy will allow the woman who sold her soul to Wall Street to present herself as the champion of the people (whom she long ago sold out to Wall Street).

And Hillary Clinton just a) demonized and b) trivialized those young feminist women.  I mean, they’re not exercising their independence and voting for whom they believe is the best candidate; they’re stupid bimbos and sluts who would sell their soul for the next boy to come along the same way Hillary sold her soul for the first Wall Street dollar to come along.

Young women are just … stupid, top Team Hillary witches say.  And filled with lust for those strapping young men over at the Bernie Sanders camp.  And they’re all going to burn in hell for it.

Because these same old, wrinkled feminists who threw Jesus in a jar of urine and thought themselves clever for calling their “art” Piss Christ believe it is not by Jesus, but by Hillary Clinton, that ye are saved.  And these former purveyors of self-justifying “tolerance” teach that all the infidels will burn in hell for not having saving faith in Hillary.

All I can tell you is the cat ought to be out of the bag about what a vicious shrew Hillary Clinton and her team of witches very clearly are – and just how much contempt they truly have for young women.

 

Hillary Clinton’s Emails So Incriminating Intelligence Officials Say They Are ‘Too Damaging To National Security To Release Under Any Circumstances’

February 3, 2016

Hillary Clinton had so much callous indifference to the security of the United States of America that she cavalierly sent and received emails that were so classified, so secret, that they cannot be released under ANY circumstance.  And not even the FBI agents investigating this case and our nation’s elected representatives can see them in their full content.  That’s how bad this mess has got.

Please understand: Hillary callously and cynically and in fact treasonously put U.S. national security and the lives of our covert agents at risk.  That is a FACT:

Let’s examine a few significant updates on the Hillary email scandal, starting with perhaps the most important — but least covered — aspect of the imbroglio: Unconscionable national security risks. In order to shield her communications from oversight and public information requests, Hillary Clinton chose to set up a private email server in her home, rather than use a secure official account. Regardless of the ethical propriety and legality of that decision (stay tuned on those points), intelligence experts believe her actions led to extraordinary breaches at the hands of foreign governments and outside entities.  Please read every word of this excerpt from Bloomberg’s Eli Lake and Josh Rogin:

Hillary Clinton didn’t take a basic precaution with her personal e-mail system to prevent hackers from impersonating or “spoofing” her identity in messages to close associates, according to former U.S. officials familiar with her e-mail system and other cyber-security experts. This vulnerability put anyone who was in communication with her clintonemail.com account while she was secretary of state at risk of being hacked. Clinton said at the United Nations last week that there were no security breaches of her personal e-mail server, which she used to send and receive more than 60,000 professional and personal e-mails. But former cyber-security officials and experts told us that there were gaps in the system…According to publicly available information, whoever administrated the system didn’t enable what’s called a Sender Policy Framework, or SPF, a simple setting that would prevent hackers sending e-mails that appear to be from clintonemail.com.

SPF is a basic and highly recommended security precaution for people who set up their own servers…Experts told us that oversight was just one flaw of a security system that would have been relatively easy for foreign intelligence services and others to exploit. “I have no doubt in my mind that this thing was penetrated by multiple foreign powers, to assume otherwise is to put blinders on,” said Bob Gourley, the chief technology officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency from 2005 to 2008 and the founder of Cognitio, a cybersecurity consultancy…Spoofing a senior official’s e-mail identity is also an easy way to conduct “spear phishing” attacks, where an attacker sends a personally crafted e-mail that appears to come from a trusted source. Once the target opens it, his own system can be compromised. Clinton said she e-mailed with dozens of State Department and White House officials using her server, including President Barack Obama.

Not only did Hillary’s overwhelming impulse for secrecy and contempt for accountability put her own emails at risk — bad enough, given her role as the country’s top diplomat — it also endangered the integrity of her contacts’ communications.  This is unforgivable.  Myopia, paranoia, arrogance and reckless incompetence, all rolled into one set of astounding revelations.  By the way, just a few days ago, the State Department shut down large parts of its email system due to malware placed by Russian hackers who somehow burrowed into the network.

Hillary Clinton’s terribly incompetent, stupid and evil homebrewn server system was designed to “[take] extraordinary steps to prevent any record of her “deliberations, decisions, and actions.”  She recklessly FAILED to install ANY security or encryption whatsoever for a significant period of time while her secret server operated out of a bathroom cabinet was vulnerable to determined enemy foreign governments.  And so you have this:

  • Bob Gourley, former chief technology officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency, states that “I have no doubt in my mind that this thing was penetrated by multiple foreign powers, to assume otherwise is to put blinders on.”
  • Former Deputy CIA Director Michael Morell said that he believes some foreign intelligence agencies possess the contents of Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

    “I think that foreign intelligence services, the good ones, have everything on any unclassified network that the government uses,” Morell said Friday in an interview on the Hugh Hewitt Show.

  • Hillary Clinton’s mushrooming email scandal will not end well no matter what conclusions are reached, Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and NSA, tells Newsmax TV.

    “I would simply say that the sin in all of this is the original sin,” Hayden said Wednesday to J.D. Hayworth, host of “Newsmax Prime.”

    “Frankly, there is no way to make this come out happy if you comingle your government and your private emails and then put all of them on a private server as opposed to a government server.

    “You’re just setting in motion a whole series of things and it doesn’t require anyone to be stupid or malevolent. If you set it up that way, it’s going to end up in a bad place and that’s the bad place we’re in now.”  […]

    Does Hayden believe Clinton’s emails had a high probability of ending up in the hands of foreign intelligence services?

    “I won’t give you a number, but a foreign intelligence service of some merit, if they were interested in those emails, I would give them a high probability of success that they would be able to penetrate that system,” he said.

  • The unfolding national security scandal involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate for president, is expected to produce evidence of foreign intelligence service involvement in the compromise of U.S. secrets placed on an unsecure email server.

    That’s the conclusion of a senior State Department official who told me at least three foreign intelligence services – the Chinese, Russians and Israelis – almost certainly were able to hack into the private email server used by Clinton from 2009 to 2013.

Yeah, she put national security at risk.  If she is elected, she will gladly sell the American people out to hostile foreign governments who intercepted her emails and would be in a position to destroy an American president by exposing her treason as they release the secrets that she stupidly shared with them.

You need to understand a few critical facts.  Fact one is that Hillary Clinton did NOT merely have a private email account, as the mainstream media keeps dishonestly implying by referring to “emails” rather than “secret server.”  No, she is a secretive, conniving fascist shrew who went to the incredible lengths of installing her own private SERVER so that she could have fascistic control over her emails and purge whatever was incriminating.  You need to understand just how insane that is.  Even President Obama himself had to say, “Hillary has a server in her house! I didn’t even know you could have one of those.”  I mean, who in the hell does that?  The only people who have private servers are drug cartel bosses who want to talk about their crimes without anyone being able to know what’s going on.  Hillary’s determination to have her own private, secret server is an explicit statement as to her intent to put herself above the law and beyond transparency or accountability.

Anybody who tells you that Hillary Clinton didn’t do anything different from other previous Secretaries of State is a stone-cold, demon-possessed LIAR.

Hillary Clinton is the first corrupt technocrat EVER to NOT have ANY official government email whatsoever:

Mar 3 2015, 7:36 pm ET
Hillary Clinton’s Personal Email Use Differed From Other Top Officials
by Perry Bacon Jr.

Hillary Clinton’s exclusive use of a non-government email account to send messages to her staff during her time as Secretary of State is a break from what other top officials have done, raising concerns from both Democrats and Republicans about the propriety of the practice.

Aides to former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and former President George W. Bush said neither official routinely sent e-mails to staffers while they held those posts. Rice “did not use her personal e-mail for official communication as Secretary” and instead exclusively used her State Department account, according to a top aide who did not want to be quoted publicly.

And  Hillary Clinton is THE first corrupt technocrat EVER to install a private server:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The computer server that transmitted and received Hillary Clinton’s emails — on a private account she used exclusively for official business when she was secretary of state — traced back to an Internet service registered to her family’s home in Chappaqua, New York, according to Internet records reviewed by The Associated Press.

The highly unusual practice of a Cabinet-level official physically running her own email would have given Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate, impressive control over limiting access to her message archives. It also would distinguish Clinton’s secretive email practices as far more sophisticated than some politicians, including Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin, who were caught conducting official business using free email services operated by Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc.

Most Internet users rely on professional outside companies, such as Google Inc. or their own employers, for the behind-the-scenes complexities of managing their email communications. Government employees generally use servers run by federal agencies where they work.

Hillary Clinton is the fascist control-freak par excellence.  She is a Nazi hiding her crimes.

The second fact you need to understand is the fact that it is crystal clear that she tried very hard to wipe her server even AFTER it had been lawfully subpoenaed.  She purged over THIRTY THOUSAND EMAILS from her secret server for the very simple reason that she is a criminal and criminals have to destroy the evidence of their crimes.  And just ONE of the reasons she tried to do so was her utter contempt for national security if it in any way got in the way of her “convenience.”  This woman along with her co-conspirator husband set up a Foundation that is every bit as slick as anything Slick Willy ever did.  Hillary Clinton used her job as Secretary of State to sell her influence with foreign governments and foreign corporations paying her off with huge donations to her in the form of gigantic honorariums for her husband’s speeches or bribe money to their foundation.

Hillary Clinton treated the Secretary of State position like her own personal fiefdom to dishonestly prosper from.  Period.

The third fact you need to understand is that Hillary Clinton – as I already underscored above – had a contempt for national security that reaches the level of treason.

It has been established that somebody on Hillary Clinton’s staff was deliberately removing the classification markers from Clinton’s emails, most likely for the sake of convenience and plausible deniability.  Look at the previous reporting of the Los Angeles Times:

The Department of Justice said it is weighing whether to launch its own investigation after the inspector general for intelligence agencies notified the agency that classified information that went through the account appeared to have been mishandled. Administration officials and investigators declined to share details about the emails. But in a separate memo to lawmakers, the inspector general said that a review of just 40 of the 30,000 emails from the Clinton server found that four had information that should have been marked and handled as classified.

Clinton has made many assurances in recent months that she did not send or receive classified information on her personal server. Her campaign says the material in question had not been specifically marked as classified and, thus, Clinton broke no rules. The inspector general disputed that characterization in a statement late Friday, saying that the information in the emails was classified at the time, even if it wasn’t marked as such, and shouldn’t have been transmitted on a personal email system.

Even so, the revelation was an uncomfortable one for the candidate. And national security experts said the disclosure that that material that should have been marked classified made its way to Clinton’s personal email account at the very least fuels legitimate speculation about how the server was used.

“It tells us why this was such a bad idea,” said Stewart A. Baker, a former general counsel to the National Security Agency now in private practice. “It raises questions.”

Among them, Baker said, was whether staffers deliberately avoided marking sensitive emails to Clinton as classified so they could sidestep the bureaucrats who handle transmission of such material.

“She skipped the government circles and nobody was overseeing this and nobody was saying, ‘This info should not be on this system,’” Baker said. “If anything, there was an incentive for people to cross the line without making clear they were doing so.”

The money phrase is this: Hillary Clinton’s “staffers deliberately avoided marking sensitive emails to Clinton as classified so they could sidestep the bureaucrats who handle transmission of such material.” 

She started out with what we now know to be a rampant lie: that she didn’t send of receive classified information.

She broke the law because she simply believed herself to be above and superior to it.

We’re bugs to Hillary Clinton.

And Hillary Clinton’s PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT IN ORDERING THIS CRIMINAL ACT is supported by direct evidence with Hillary Clinton caught red-handed demanding that classification markers be stripped and a classified document can be sent via unclassified channels.  Hillary Clinton’s OWN WORDS on how to send a classified document:

“If they can’t, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.”

In other words, Hillary Clinton is caught with the smoking gun in her gunpowder-residue-tainted hand, having ORDERED HER STAFF TO STRIP THE CLASSIFICATION MARKERS FROM CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AND SEND IT TO HER NONSECURE.

Now we know that there were THOUSANDS of emails sent and received that were classified but ILLEGALLY had their classification markers removed.

Which is to say that Hillary’s excuse – that there weren’t any classification markers – is itself merely one more indictment proving her criminality.  Because there sure as hell WERE classification markers before she ordered them removed.

Hillary Clinton ought to be in prison.  Right this moment, she should be trying to fabricate a shiv for herself as she schemes to stab her way to the position of top inmate.

We’ve got the now way, WAY past one thousand classified emails, some classified at such a high level it is beyond unreal treated with more indifference than a third grader writing a note on a piece of paper and then trying to toss it to another kid across a crowded classroom.

And pretty much every security expert says it would be more amazing that foreign governments DIDN’T read these emails than if they did.  Which is another way of saying all of our enemies now know – thanks to Hillary Clinton – secrets that are so sensitive, so confidential, so vital to American national security that only a very few eyes on planet earth ought to ever be allowed to see them.

At the very least, Hillary Clinton displayed such self-centeredness and such piss-poor judgment that it is wildly beyond unreal.  But nobody could be THAT incompetent.  This soars beyond simple incompetence and enters the realm of a level of hatred and contempt that is frankly stunning.

Democrats are truly evil, depraved people who despise the United States of America.  That is now beyond obvious as they rally their wagons behind a traitor to the United States.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 632 other followers