Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Team Hillary Clinton: ‘Special Place In Hell’ For Women Who Don’t Vote For Hillary, And Oh, Yeah, Young Women Are Ignorant BIMBOS

February 8, 2016

It’s always funny to me to watch hypocrites, I mean liberals.

Imagine if Ted Cruz started talking about “a special place in hell” for those who didn’t vote for him.  Imagine if the Cruz campaign spouted the outright misogynist contempt for women that Hillary’s top shrews just spouted.

The feminist writer Gloria Steinem apologized on Sunday for remarks about young women who support Bernie Sanders, not long after Hillary Clinton defended Madeleine Albright over her comment that there is “a special place in hell” for women who do not support Clinton.

Steinem posted her apology to Facebook, writing that she “misspoke” on Friday when on a talk show she spoke about women who support Clinton’s rival in the Democratic presidential race, Senator Bernie Sanders.

Appearing on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher, Steinem said women “get more activist as they grow older. And when you’re younger, you think: ‘Where are the boys? The boys are with Bernie.’”

On Sunday she wrote that she had not meant to imply “young women aren’t serious in their politics”. [….]

Also on Sunday, Clinton said that the remark Albright delivered at a rally in Concord, New Hampshire, “There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other,” was nothing new. Albright has used it at least since 2008, when she supported Clinton’s first run for president, against Barack Obama.

Clinton said that the belief arose from Albright’s own long fight for equality. Nevertheless, on Saturday, hours after Steinem’s remark, Albright’s words angered some, who found them condescending, and brought questions of gender and politics into high relief on the trail.

Clinton appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday and described Albright’s comment as a “light-hearted but very pointed remark”.

“Madeline has been saying this for many, many years,” Clinton said. “She believes it firmly, in part because she knows what a struggle it has been, and she understands the struggle is not over.”

Albright served as secretary of state – the first woman in the post – during Bill Clinton’s presidency. She “has a life experience that I respect”, Clinton said.

“I don’t want people to be offended,” Clinton said. But when asked if she understood why some women did take offense, she suggested political correctness had made Americans overly sensitive.

“Good grief, we’re getting offended by everything these days!” she said. “People can’t say anything without offending somebody.”

I want you to imagine if Ted Cruz had said there was a special place in hell for people who didn’t vote for him and how Hillary Clinton and her cult priestesses would have handled it.

It’s always amazing for me how liberals exploit religion while demonizing and slandering people who would dare to accurately quote the Bible to explain how God patiently explained His positions.  How DARE we directly quote the Bible to reveal the truth about God’s views on homosexuality, abortion and human-government as Savior socialism.

I want to call out Hillary Clinton for using the spike-studded bludgeon of political correctness to attack her rivals for YEARS.

Young women support Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton by a tune of 84% to 14%.

It’s because Hillary spent years of her life cynically and cravenly exploiting the most politically correct brand of feminism only to finally hang on her own damn petard as women realized that the same woman who says that women should be believed because they’re women demonized NUMEROUS women for coming forward to claim that Bill Clinton was a serial molester of women and an outright RAPIST.  As women finally realized that Hillary Clinton took MILLIONS from the most oppressive regimes to women and women’s rights on the face of the earth.  That Hillary Clinton has been a lifelong WHORE for Wall Street and was paid $40 million for prostituting herself for them and for their interests.

I mean, Hillary Clinton has raised more than $153 million primarily from the worst and most greedy Wall Street players just since 2001.

And I mean, 2001, that’s right: that’s the year Bill and Hillary left the White House “dead broke” unless Hillary Clinton is a demon-possessed LIAR.

Hillary says, “You know, you had to make double the money because of, obviously, taxes, and then pay off the debts and get us houses and take care of family members.”  Because, you know, when Democrats viciously attacked John McCain over “houses,” it’s unfair to expect Bill and Hillary to be satisfied with just one house.

Definition of “dead broke”: Hillary’s limousine chauffeur had to drive her to the airport for first class travel when she clearly belonged in a private jet.

Hillary says indignantly that she has never changed a vote due to the millions she has received.  Unfortunately for Hillary Clinton, Democrat Sen. Elizabeth Warren remembers what an outright lie this ludicrous statement is.

Warren is on the record saying of Hillary Clinton:

“As Senator Clinton, the pressures are very different. It’s a well-financed industry,” Warren said. “She has taken money from the groups, and more to the point, she worries about them as a constituency … The credit industry on this bankruptcy bill has spent tens of millions of dollars lobbying.”

Which is a polite way of saying that if Hillary Clinton wants what used to be her soul back, she’s going to have to come crawling to its current legal owners at Goldman Sachs.

I always marvel how massive wealth is demonized … unless the Democrat who is running for president happens to be filthy freaking rich the way Hillary Clinton is this year or John Kerry was filthy rich in 2004.  But don’t worry, abject hypocrisy will allow the woman who sold her soul to Wall Street to present herself as the champion of the people (whom she long ago sold out to Wall Street).

And Hillary Clinton just a) demonized and b) trivialized those young feminist women.  I mean, they’re not exercising their independence and voting for whom they believe is the best candidate; they’re stupid bimbos and sluts who would sell their soul for the next boy to come along the same way Hillary sold her soul for the first Wall Street dollar to come along.

Young women are just … stupid, top Team Hillary witches say.  And filled with lust for those strapping young men over at the Bernie Sanders camp.  And they’re all going to burn in hell for it.

Because these same old, wrinkled feminists who threw Jesus in a jar of urine and thought themselves clever for calling their “art” Piss Christ believe it is not by Jesus, but by Hillary Clinton, that ye are saved.  And these former purveyors of self-justifying “tolerance” teach that all the infidels will burn in hell for not having saving faith in Hillary.

All I can tell you is the cat ought to be out of the bag about what a vicious shrew Hillary Clinton and her team of witches very clearly are – and just how much contempt they truly have for young women.

 

Hillary Clinton’s Emails So Incriminating Intelligence Officials Say They Are ‘Too Damaging To National Security To Release Under Any Circumstances’

February 3, 2016

Hillary Clinton had so much callous indifference to the security of the United States of America that she cavalierly sent and received emails that were so classified, so secret, that they cannot be released under ANY circumstance.  And not even the FBI agents investigating this case and our nation’s elected representatives can see them in their full content.  That’s how bad this mess has got.

Please understand: Hillary callously and cynically and in fact treasonously put U.S. national security and the lives of our covert agents at risk.  That is a FACT:

Let’s examine a few significant updates on the Hillary email scandal, starting with perhaps the most important — but least covered — aspect of the imbroglio: Unconscionable national security risks. In order to shield her communications from oversight and public information requests, Hillary Clinton chose to set up a private email server in her home, rather than use a secure official account. Regardless of the ethical propriety and legality of that decision (stay tuned on those points), intelligence experts believe her actions led to extraordinary breaches at the hands of foreign governments and outside entities.  Please read every word of this excerpt from Bloomberg’s Eli Lake and Josh Rogin:

Hillary Clinton didn’t take a basic precaution with her personal e-mail system to prevent hackers from impersonating or “spoofing” her identity in messages to close associates, according to former U.S. officials familiar with her e-mail system and other cyber-security experts. This vulnerability put anyone who was in communication with her clintonemail.com account while she was secretary of state at risk of being hacked. Clinton said at the United Nations last week that there were no security breaches of her personal e-mail server, which she used to send and receive more than 60,000 professional and personal e-mails. But former cyber-security officials and experts told us that there were gaps in the system…According to publicly available information, whoever administrated the system didn’t enable what’s called a Sender Policy Framework, or SPF, a simple setting that would prevent hackers sending e-mails that appear to be from clintonemail.com.

SPF is a basic and highly recommended security precaution for people who set up their own servers…Experts told us that oversight was just one flaw of a security system that would have been relatively easy for foreign intelligence services and others to exploit. “I have no doubt in my mind that this thing was penetrated by multiple foreign powers, to assume otherwise is to put blinders on,” said Bob Gourley, the chief technology officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency from 2005 to 2008 and the founder of Cognitio, a cybersecurity consultancy…Spoofing a senior official’s e-mail identity is also an easy way to conduct “spear phishing” attacks, where an attacker sends a personally crafted e-mail that appears to come from a trusted source. Once the target opens it, his own system can be compromised. Clinton said she e-mailed with dozens of State Department and White House officials using her server, including President Barack Obama.

Not only did Hillary’s overwhelming impulse for secrecy and contempt for accountability put her own emails at risk — bad enough, given her role as the country’s top diplomat — it also endangered the integrity of her contacts’ communications.  This is unforgivable.  Myopia, paranoia, arrogance and reckless incompetence, all rolled into one set of astounding revelations.  By the way, just a few days ago, the State Department shut down large parts of its email system due to malware placed by Russian hackers who somehow burrowed into the network.

Hillary Clinton’s terribly incompetent, stupid and evil homebrewn server system was designed to “[take] extraordinary steps to prevent any record of her “deliberations, decisions, and actions.”  She recklessly FAILED to install ANY security or encryption whatsoever for a significant period of time while her secret server operated out of a bathroom cabinet was vulnerable to determined enemy foreign governments.  And so you have this:

  • Bob Gourley, former chief technology officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency, states that “I have no doubt in my mind that this thing was penetrated by multiple foreign powers, to assume otherwise is to put blinders on.”
  • Former Deputy CIA Director Michael Morell said that he believes some foreign intelligence agencies possess the contents of Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

    “I think that foreign intelligence services, the good ones, have everything on any unclassified network that the government uses,” Morell said Friday in an interview on the Hugh Hewitt Show.

  • Hillary Clinton’s mushrooming email scandal will not end well no matter what conclusions are reached, Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and NSA, tells Newsmax TV.

    “I would simply say that the sin in all of this is the original sin,” Hayden said Wednesday to J.D. Hayworth, host of “Newsmax Prime.”

    “Frankly, there is no way to make this come out happy if you comingle your government and your private emails and then put all of them on a private server as opposed to a government server.

    “You’re just setting in motion a whole series of things and it doesn’t require anyone to be stupid or malevolent. If you set it up that way, it’s going to end up in a bad place and that’s the bad place we’re in now.”  […]

    Does Hayden believe Clinton’s emails had a high probability of ending up in the hands of foreign intelligence services?

    “I won’t give you a number, but a foreign intelligence service of some merit, if they were interested in those emails, I would give them a high probability of success that they would be able to penetrate that system,” he said.

  • The unfolding national security scandal involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate for president, is expected to produce evidence of foreign intelligence service involvement in the compromise of U.S. secrets placed on an unsecure email server.

    That’s the conclusion of a senior State Department official who told me at least three foreign intelligence services – the Chinese, Russians and Israelis – almost certainly were able to hack into the private email server used by Clinton from 2009 to 2013.

Yeah, she put national security at risk.  If she is elected, she will gladly sell the American people out to hostile foreign governments who intercepted her emails and would be in a position to destroy an American president by exposing her treason as they release the secrets that she stupidly shared with them.

You need to understand a few critical facts.  Fact one is that Hillary Clinton did NOT merely have a private email account, as the mainstream media keeps dishonestly implying by referring to “emails” rather than “secret server.”  No, she is a secretive, conniving fascist shrew who went to the incredible lengths of installing her own private SERVER so that she could have fascistic control over her emails and purge whatever was incriminating.  You need to understand just how insane that is.  Even President Obama himself had to say, “Hillary has a server in her house! I didn’t even know you could have one of those.”  I mean, who in the hell does that?  The only people who have private servers are drug cartel bosses who want to talk about their crimes without anyone being able to know what’s going on.  Hillary’s determination to have her own private, secret server is an explicit statement as to her intent to put herself above the law and beyond transparency or accountability.

Anybody who tells you that Hillary Clinton didn’t do anything different from other previous Secretaries of State is a stone-cold, demon-possessed LIAR.

Hillary Clinton is the first corrupt technocrat EVER to NOT have ANY official government email whatsoever:

Mar 3 2015, 7:36 pm ET
Hillary Clinton’s Personal Email Use Differed From Other Top Officials
by Perry Bacon Jr.

Hillary Clinton’s exclusive use of a non-government email account to send messages to her staff during her time as Secretary of State is a break from what other top officials have done, raising concerns from both Democrats and Republicans about the propriety of the practice.

Aides to former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and former President George W. Bush said neither official routinely sent e-mails to staffers while they held those posts. Rice “did not use her personal e-mail for official communication as Secretary” and instead exclusively used her State Department account, according to a top aide who did not want to be quoted publicly.

And  Hillary Clinton is THE first corrupt technocrat EVER to install a private server:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The computer server that transmitted and received Hillary Clinton’s emails — on a private account she used exclusively for official business when she was secretary of state — traced back to an Internet service registered to her family’s home in Chappaqua, New York, according to Internet records reviewed by The Associated Press.

The highly unusual practice of a Cabinet-level official physically running her own email would have given Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate, impressive control over limiting access to her message archives. It also would distinguish Clinton’s secretive email practices as far more sophisticated than some politicians, including Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin, who were caught conducting official business using free email services operated by Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc.

Most Internet users rely on professional outside companies, such as Google Inc. or their own employers, for the behind-the-scenes complexities of managing their email communications. Government employees generally use servers run by federal agencies where they work.

Hillary Clinton is the fascist control-freak par excellence.  She is a Nazi hiding her crimes.

The second fact you need to understand is the fact that it is crystal clear that she tried very hard to wipe her server even AFTER it had been lawfully subpoenaed.  She purged over THIRTY THOUSAND EMAILS from her secret server for the very simple reason that she is a criminal and criminals have to destroy the evidence of their crimes.  And just ONE of the reasons she tried to do so was her utter contempt for national security if it in any way got in the way of her “convenience.”  This woman along with her co-conspirator husband set up a Foundation that is every bit as slick as anything Slick Willy ever did.  Hillary Clinton used her job as Secretary of State to sell her influence with foreign governments and foreign corporations paying her off with huge donations to her in the form of gigantic honorariums for her husband’s speeches or bribe money to their foundation.

Hillary Clinton treated the Secretary of State position like her own personal fiefdom to dishonestly prosper from.  Period.

The third fact you need to understand is that Hillary Clinton – as I already underscored above – had a contempt for national security that reaches the level of treason.

It has been established that somebody on Hillary Clinton’s staff was deliberately removing the classification markers from Clinton’s emails, most likely for the sake of convenience and plausible deniability.  Look at the previous reporting of the Los Angeles Times:

The Department of Justice said it is weighing whether to launch its own investigation after the inspector general for intelligence agencies notified the agency that classified information that went through the account appeared to have been mishandled. Administration officials and investigators declined to share details about the emails. But in a separate memo to lawmakers, the inspector general said that a review of just 40 of the 30,000 emails from the Clinton server found that four had information that should have been marked and handled as classified.

Clinton has made many assurances in recent months that she did not send or receive classified information on her personal server. Her campaign says the material in question had not been specifically marked as classified and, thus, Clinton broke no rules. The inspector general disputed that characterization in a statement late Friday, saying that the information in the emails was classified at the time, even if it wasn’t marked as such, and shouldn’t have been transmitted on a personal email system.

Even so, the revelation was an uncomfortable one for the candidate. And national security experts said the disclosure that that material that should have been marked classified made its way to Clinton’s personal email account at the very least fuels legitimate speculation about how the server was used.

“It tells us why this was such a bad idea,” said Stewart A. Baker, a former general counsel to the National Security Agency now in private practice. “It raises questions.”

Among them, Baker said, was whether staffers deliberately avoided marking sensitive emails to Clinton as classified so they could sidestep the bureaucrats who handle transmission of such material.

“She skipped the government circles and nobody was overseeing this and nobody was saying, ‘This info should not be on this system,’” Baker said. “If anything, there was an incentive for people to cross the line without making clear they were doing so.”

The money phrase is this: Hillary Clinton’s “staffers deliberately avoided marking sensitive emails to Clinton as classified so they could sidestep the bureaucrats who handle transmission of such material.” 

She started out with what we now know to be a rampant lie: that she didn’t send of receive classified information.

She broke the law because she simply believed herself to be above and superior to it.

We’re bugs to Hillary Clinton.

And Hillary Clinton’s PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT IN ORDERING THIS CRIMINAL ACT is supported by direct evidence with Hillary Clinton caught red-handed demanding that classification markers be stripped and a classified document can be sent via unclassified channels.  Hillary Clinton’s OWN WORDS on how to send a classified document:

“If they can’t, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.”

In other words, Hillary Clinton is caught with the smoking gun in her gunpowder-residue-tainted hand, having ORDERED HER STAFF TO STRIP THE CLASSIFICATION MARKERS FROM CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS AND SEND IT TO HER NONSECURE.

Now we know that there were THOUSANDS of emails sent and received that were classified but ILLEGALLY had their classification markers removed.

Which is to say that Hillary’s excuse – that there weren’t any classification markers – is itself merely one more indictment proving her criminality.  Because there sure as hell WERE classification markers before she ordered them removed.

Hillary Clinton ought to be in prison.  Right this moment, she should be trying to fabricate a shiv for herself as she schemes to stab her way to the position of top inmate.

We’ve got the now way, WAY past one thousand classified emails, some classified at such a high level it is beyond unreal treated with more indifference than a third grader writing a note on a piece of paper and then trying to toss it to another kid across a crowded classroom.

And pretty much every security expert says it would be more amazing that foreign governments DIDN’T read these emails than if they did.  Which is another way of saying all of our enemies now know – thanks to Hillary Clinton – secrets that are so sensitive, so confidential, so vital to American national security that only a very few eyes on planet earth ought to ever be allowed to see them.

At the very least, Hillary Clinton displayed such self-centeredness and such piss-poor judgment that it is wildly beyond unreal.  But nobody could be THAT incompetent.  This soars beyond simple incompetence and enters the realm of a level of hatred and contempt that is frankly stunning.

Democrats are truly evil, depraved people who despise the United States of America.  That is now beyond obvious as they rally their wagons behind a traitor to the United States.

In Violation Of National Security Laws, Hillary Ordered Her Staff To Strip Classification Markers And Send Classified Data Non-Secure

January 11, 2016

I actually already TOLD you Hillary Clinton was stripping classified headers from her emails and treating them in a matter that displayed her outright contempt for the national security and the safety of the American people.

I want to show you WHAT I ALREADY TOLD YOU BECAUSE IT WAS ALREADY SO DAMN OBVIOUS.  But first, here’s what this despicable Stalinist bureaucrat just got caught red-handed having ordered.  And ask yourself, WHY did she say to remove the “identifying heading”???  This is what you call a classic example of “conscious knowledge of guilt.”  She was literally saying, “I want you to destroy the evidence of my wrongdoing and make it harder for any future search to reveal what I did.”:

Has the State Department released a smoking gun in the Hillary Clinton e-mail scandal? In a thread from June 2011, Hillary exchanges e-mails with Jake Sullivan, then her deputy chief of staff and now her campaign foreign-policy adviser, in which she impatiently waits for a set of talking points. When Sullivan tells her that the source is having trouble with the secure fax, Hillary then orders Sullivan to have the data stripped of its markings and sent through a non-secure channel.

That should be game, set, and match, yes?

hillary-e-mail2

“If they can’t, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” That’s an order to violate the laws handling classified material. There is no other way to read that demand. Regardless of whether or not Sullivan complied, this demolishes Hillary’s claim to be ignorant of marking issues, as well as strongly suggests that the 1,340 instances where this did occur likely came under her direction.

[…]

And in fact the Obama State Department has been doing everything possible to cover up Hillary Clinton’s acts of treason out of the worst form of cynical political loyalty to the Democrat Party at the expense of the United States of America.  Two previous articles and my comments:

Sources: Clinton email markings changed to hide classified info
By  Catherine Herridge
·Published September 01, 2015
· FoxNews.com

At least four classified Hillary Clinton emails had their markings changed to a category that shields the content from Congress and the public, Fox News has learned, in what State Department whistleblowers believed to be an effort to hide the true extent of classified information on the former secretary of state’s server.

The changes, which came to light after the first tranche of 296 Benghazi emails was released in May, was confirmed by two sources — one congressional, the other intelligence. The four emails originally were marked classified after a review by career officials at the State Department. But after a second review by the department’s legal office, the designation was switched to “B5” — also known as “deliberative process,” which refers to internal deliberations by the Executive Branch. Such discussions are exempt from public release.

The B5 coding has the effect, according to a congressional source, of dropping the email content “down a deep black hole.”

[…]

Changing facts after the fact doesn’t change the FACTS to anyone who is honest or capable of valuing the truth.  This is Stalinism.  This is a tactic right out of George Orwell’s “Ministry of Truth.”

And the other article is from The Los Angeles Times which previously reported and also see my previous comments:

The Los Angeles Times reported months ago:

The Department of Justice said it is weighing whether to launch its own investigation after the inspector general for intelligence agencies notified the agency that classified information that went through the account appeared to have been mishandled. Administration officials and investigators declined to share details about the emails. But in a separate memo to lawmakers, the inspector general said that a review of just 40 of the 30,000 emails from the Clinton server found that four had information that should have been marked and handled as classified.

Clinton has made many assurances in recent months that she did not send or receive classified information on her personal server. Her campaign says the material in question had not been specifically marked as classified and, thus, Clinton broke no rules. The inspector general disputed that characterization in a statement late Friday, saying that the information in the emails was classified at the time, even if it wasn’t marked as such, and shouldn’t have been transmitted on a personal email system.

Even so, the revelation was an uncomfortable one for the candidate. And national security experts said the disclosure that that material that should have been marked classified made its way to Clinton’s personal email account at the very least fuels legitimate speculation about how the server was used.

“It tells us why this was such a bad idea,” said Stewart A. Baker, a former general counsel to the National Security Agency now in private practice. “It raises questions.”

Among them, Baker said, was whether staffers deliberately avoided marking sensitive emails to Clinton as classified so they could sidestep the bureaucrats who handle transmission of such material.

“She skipped the government circles and nobody was overseeing this and nobody was saying, ‘This info should not be on this system,’” Baker said. “If anything, there was an incentive for people to cross the line without making clear they were doing so.”

I pointed that article out and its obvious ramifications back in an article I wrote in September of this year.  Somebody clearly stripped the classification markers – an act of TREASON – to give Hillary Clinton “plausible deniability.”  Period.  We’ve known for MONTHS that criminal acts were committed by Hillary Clinton and by her staff of witches and warlocks.

The second thing – and frankly Herridge should have brought this little factoid up in her above article – is that THE STATE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO UNILATERALLY ALTER THE CLASSIFICATION OF A DOCUMENT FROM ANOTHER AGENCY, SUCH AS THE CIA.

It is NOT the State Department’s information; it is the CIA’s information that the CIA shared with the State Department.

I’ll get to how incredibly DANGEROUS to our nation’s security this Democrat trick is later.  But for now, let me continue on Hillary Clinton’s criminality and now the entire Obama State Department’s criminal cover-up of the clear future Democrat nominee’s criminality.

An article from the Daily Beast back in July put it this way:

Classified emails stored on Hillary Clinton’s private computer server contained information from five U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA and NSA, McClatchy reported Thursday. One of the emails about the 2012 Benghazi consulate attack was even released to the public by the State Department in May despite it being classified. That email contained information from the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which uses spy satellites. Four other emails contained info from the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which oversees all intelligence agencies. The inspector general for the intelligence community found the five classified emails out of a sample of 40 from the 30,000 emails Clinton gave to the State Department.

But perhaps the most troubling element in the McClatchy story is the assertion that “the State Department so far has refused to grant the intelligence-community inspector general access to the entire batch of emails on jurisdictional grounds.”

As Herridge reports, that number of “five” emails has now exploded into nearly 700.

For the record, that number of “five” emails that “exploded into nearly 700” has now exploded to over one thousand.

Do you see the documented FACT: we have numerous cases where classified information – in wild, rabid violation of MULTIPLE national security laws – was sent with the  classification markers having been CRIMINALLY REMOVED.  The ONLY question was who in Hillary Clinton’s staff ordered it, how long before that individual ended up in prison, and whether there was any smoking gun that Hillary Clinton knew about this tactic.

And now we have confirmed that I should have added “Clintonian” tactic to the end of the above paragraph.  Because not only do we have proof that Hillary Clinton knew about it, WE NOW HAVE PROOF THAT IT WAS HILLARY CLINTON HERSELF WHO DEMANDED THIS CRIMINAL AND TREASONOUS PROCEDURE BE USED.

The mainstream media keeps talking about Hillary Clinton’s “private emails.”  That is a lie and a cover-up; because what the REAL scandal is has been Hillary Clinton’s secret server that she was using to cover-up her criminal acts of corruption and criminal negligence.

Hillary Clinton has flagrantly revealed herself to be the worst kind of secretive fascist dictatorial personality who believes that she is innately superior to everyone else and should not be held to the same standards that others should be held to.

If the Obama Justice Department doesn’t indict Hillary Clinton the way they indicted war hero General David Petraeus – who committed a TINY FRACTION of the offenses Hillary has already been caught red-handed having committed – we can know for certain that the Constitution has been abolished and the only possible way to preserve the United States of America is by a new group of founding fathers who will do what our previous founding fathers did and go to war against a tyrannous king.

But that is not going to happen, we’re NOT going to correct our course toward abject disaster, tyranny, evil and global Armageddon.  I’ve got the Holy Bible to tell me that.  Rather, the same apathy and ignorance that gave us Obama will continue to enable “the mystery of lawlessness” at every turn until the last turn leads the remnant of this once great nation straight to hell.

 

Cockroach Democrats Go From Supporting Bush’ War On Terror, To Claiming Being Like Bush Is Evil, To Claiming We’re Just Like Bush

December 30, 2015

If you are a Democrat, you are the lowest form of hypocrite there is, there ever has been or there ever will be.

Let me simply point out the fact that the Democrat Party voted to support George Bush’s War on Terror after the 9/11 attack, and then treasonously cut-and-ran on their duty WHILE OUR TROOPS WERE IN THE FIELD FIGHTING FOR THE WAR THEY VOTED FOR.  In fact, now-President Obama and President wanna-be Hillary Clinton BOTH voted to cut off all funding for our troops while they were still in the field fighting on foreign soil while hoping that traitors wouldn’t abandon them at home.  And at this point it is beyond obvious that the only way the United States will actually be able to end this war on terror with victory will be to hunt down every single Democrat  with dogs and burn them all alive.

Allow me to present the list of Democrat Senators who voted for George Bush’s Iraq War Resolution.  I made the list easier to see by pasting in only those Democrats who voted “yes.”  Note that the final tally of 29 Democrats voting yes – which represents very nearly 60% of all Democrats in the U.S. Senate – is cited:

Senate Roll Call: Iraq Resolution

Friday, October 11, 2002

Following is an alphabetical listing by state of how each senator voted on President Bush’s Iraq resolution. A “yes” vote was a vote to grant President Bush the power to attack Iraq unilaterally. A “no” vote was a vote to defeat the measure. Voting “yes” were 29 Democrats and 48 Republicans. Voting “no” were 1 Republican, 21 Democrats, and 1 Independent.

Arkansas Blanche Lincoln (D): Yes
California Dianne Feinstein (D): Yes
Connecticut Christopher Dodd (D): Yes Joseph Lieberman (D): Yes
Delaware Joseph Biden (D): Yes Thomas Carper (D): Yes
Florida Bill Nelson (D): Yes
Georgia Max Cleland (D): Yes Zell Miller (D): Yes
Indiana Evan Bayh (D): Yes
Iowa Tom Harkin (D): Yes
Louisiana John Breaux (D): Yes Mary Landrieu (D): Yes
Massachusetts John Kerry (D): Yes
Missouri Jean Carnahan (D): Yes
Montana Max Baucus (D): Yes
Nebraska Ben Nelson (D): Yes
Nevada Harry Reid (D): Yes
New Jersey Robert Torricelli (D): Yes
New Mexico
New York Hillary Clinton (D): Yes Charles Schumer (D): Yes
North Carolina John Edwards (D): Yes
North Dakota Byron Dorgan (D): Yes
South Carolina Ernest “Fritz” Hollings (D): Yes
South Dakota Thomas Daschle (D): Yes Tim Johnson (D): Yes
Washington Maria Cantwell (D): Yes
West Virginia Jay Rockefeller (D): Yes
Wisconsin Herb Kohl (D): Yes

Notice also that all of the top Democrats of the time voted “yes” including Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Joe Biden and Harry Reid.

But just like Bush?  Not on your life.  Bush stayed the course; Democrats cut and ran like the cut-and-run roaches that they are.  Bush had integrity; Democrats had cynical exploitation.

And let me point out the fact that to the extent that George W. Bush failed in his war on terror, maybe – just maybe – we ought to do something DIFFERENT and not follow in the same basic fallacy that Bush pursued.  I submit that Bush made two fundamental mistakes: 1) he refused to consider the religious motivation of the Islamic jihadists and confront Islam with its profound and possibly pathological problem of religious-inspired violence; and 2) Bush wrongly believed that “democracy” was an intrinsic good and that any people who voted would vote for freedom when the fact of the matter is that bad and ignorant people will vote in a bad and ignorant way.  And I further submit that since Barack Obama’s strategy has now failed about a thousand times worse than Bush’s – realize that Islamic State emerged COMPLETELY out of the failure of Obama to fight the “war on terror” that he steadfastly refused to even acknowledge and we’ve paid DEARLY for his foolish mistake – maybe we need to pursue a completely different policy and recognize Islamic terrorism and the roots that are sustaining it for what it clearly is.

Anyway, here’s the current story framed the way Democrats want you  to see things now:

On Muslims, Democrats Find an Unlikely Ally: George W Bush
By josh lederman, associated press
·WASHINGTON — Dec 25, 2015, 1:00 PM ET

Taunted by Republicans to declare war on “radical Islamic terrorism,” Democrats are turning to an unlikely ally: George W. Bush.

President Barack Obama, under pressure to be more aggressive on terrorism, regularly cites his predecessor’s refusal to demonize Muslims or play into the notion of a clash between Islam and the West. It’s a striking endorsement from a president whose political rise was predicated on opposition to the Iraq war and Bush’s hawkish approach in the Middle East.

As Hillary Clinton put it, “George W. Bush was right.”

Don’t you DARE try to grab hold of Bush’s coattails now, you miserable ROACHES.

I just want to keep pointing out what I’ve been saying for the official record. Go back in time to early 2011 – when Obama was claiming he had healed the planet – and you’ll find me having said this.  Note in particular the bold-face and italicized paragraph:

Basically, the Judeo-Christian worldview – “Christendom,” if you like – has been treated like a salad bar in the Western Civilization that had been forged by Christianity, and secular humanists can pick out the parts that they like and throw away the rest.  But it’s not a salad bar; Judeo-Christianity as both a religion and a worldview is far more like the foundations of a great building.  And what these secular humanists have been doing is pulling out the foundational pillars one block at a time until there is nothing left to sustain the surrounding structure.

Which is precisely why the West – which used to be called “Christendom” – is now on the verge of complete collapse on virtually every level.

I see the war on terror, and from the start I have seen the glaring flaw in our strategy (yes, even when George Bush was waging it).  Basically, we have confronted totalitarian Islam on the military, political and economic fronts.  But we have utterly ignored the religious front – which is precisely the major front by which totalitiarian Islam has been attacking us.  Like it or not, 9/11 was a religious act.  And there has been no major movement whatsoever – either by the Western powers or by the movements within Islam itself – to confront the religious grounds of the totalitarian Islamists.

And the reason is because we have nothing to confront them with.  Secular humanists/atheists have undermined public religious expression at every turn, while cultural relativists have contextualized religion in such a way to strip it of any spiritual power whatsoever.  Now when we truly need true spiritual power to confront the demonic power motivating radical Islam, basically all we’ve got is allegorical dirt clods.

In the sphere of Islam, jihadists have the superior Qu’ranic argument that it is THEY who are carrying out Muhammad’s vision for Islam, not the liberal Westernized contextualizers who want to make very clear claims of Muhammad into metaphors and allegories representing something else.  Muhammad was a man of genuine violence; he had been in some thirty military campaigns in his life; he had committed numerous genocidal campaigns against “infidels”; and he had another thirty military campaigns planned at the time of his death, including the conquest of Western Europe as the means to spread Islam (“submission”) and the call of Allahu Akbar (a comparative which means “Allah is greater”).  If Muhammad is in any way, shape or form a representative paradigm of what it means to be “Muslim,” then the jihadists are right.

And liberalism – whether it be religious/theological or political/cultural liberalism – has exactly what to answer that?  Other than mocking or trivializing it?

Did political liberals – like the liberal rabbis from the LA Times article above – truly believe that we overcome the threat of terrorism by simply changing the name to “overseas contingency operation” from “war on terror”?

As bad as the religion of Allah may be for a free society, it has a great deal of force when the competition is cultural nothingness, the decaying leftovers of “salad bar pseudo-Judeo-Christianity.”

Notice I point out I’d argued this many times before, but I just don’t have the time to go back and search for my earliest argument for the fact that ignoring the very clearly Islamic tie to terrorism is and has been a giant mistake and that we cannot win if we don’t understand why our enemy keeps wanting to see us spitting blood as they jubilantly cut our heads off.

And Bush was also fundamentally wrong in his insistence that bringing “democracy” to the Middle East would make that region a better place given the simple fact that bad people will vote in a bad way.  I’ll simply put it in the words of founding father James Madison who said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”  And I’ll further point out that while Islam might be “religious” it is NOT “moral” by any Judeo-Christian standard that values human dignity and freedom.  It is no accident that while democracy emerged out of Judeo-Christianity and every single “Christian” nation has become a democracy, not one single Islamic country has EVER become a democracy in the 1,500 year history of Islam.  Asking Muslims to create a democratic republic is like asking elephants to build a space ship.  Neither is going to happen without a massive transformation in either the elephant or the Muslim.

So I just want to point out for the factual record that I don’t CARE what Bush said.  BUSH WAS WRONG.  I said it YEARS ago back when it mattered.  I said it before Obama’s horrible, godawful foreign policy that made Bush’s look like the greatest thing since sliced bread had the wheels completely fall off and we started watching in horror as Obama has since kept trying to drag the wheel-less cart by sheer undying moral idiocy rather than simply admit he was wrong.

Here are a number of article titles I came across while I was searching for the above quote that highlight rather key differences between Bush and Obama and conservatives and liberals:

On the article from the liberal “journalist” who wishes a terrorist had been a conservative tea party member, let’s just realize how COMMON that vile attitude is among liberals.  Samual L. Jackson, actor, liberal and demonic turd, just got through telling the world that when he heard about the San Bernardino terror attack, his very first thought was “how much I really wanted that to just be another, you know, crazy white dude, and not really some Muslims.”  Because like ALL Democrats he is a pathological RACIST BIGOT who hates Americans and therefore lives in an alternate reality where it is the American white people he so despises who are guilty of all the sins in the world.  He goes on to label the sort of people who just murdered 14 human beings as ” the new young black men.”

No, don’t be comparing Obama to Bush or Democrat-fool foreign policy to Republicans.  Just DON’T.  You damn hypocrite liars.  You damn and damnable liberals are SO wrapped up and enmeshed in the Muslim Monsters who are trying to murder us it makes me sick.  You both want the same damn thing: the State worshipped as God and the people trampled upon as they are compelled to do your bidding by force.

Also keep in mind that President George W. Bush PREDICTED the meltdown in Iraq if a future fool were to try to undo what Bush had at great cost managed to finally do:

“I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.” — President Bush, 2007

Which is EXACTLY what happened because our Fool-in-Chief began his fool presidency doing the following:

US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.

Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”

So don’t EVER let ANY Democrat cite Obama now.

Bush didn’t do that.  Bush warned AGAINST doing that.  It was OBAMA who foolishly abandoned Iraq against every single one of his generals’ recommendations and them demonically and deceitfully tried to blame it on Bush and on a status of forces agreement that had NOTHING to do with Obama’s stupid decision-making.

Bush WON the war in Iraq: Vice President Joe Biden claimed that fact, saying:

“I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government,” said Biden.

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  Barack Obama claimed that fact, claiming in 2009 “an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.”

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  Even Bush’s terrorist enemies acknowledged it by saying in their radio transmissions that were intercepted, “We are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.”

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  OBAMA LOST IT BECAUSE OBAMA IS A WICKED FOOL.

Terrorism has EXPLODED under Obama by EVERY metric you want to use.  Deaths from terrorism have already QUADRUPLED under Obama; and the wicked fool’s still got over a year left that we can already see are going to be so much worse it’s not even REAL.  Realize that in the first five years of Obama’s failed rule, terrorism exploded 150 percent.   But that’s NOTHING because terrorism under Obama exploded by ANOTHER 81 percent just last year alone.  How do you think 2015 is going to look, you Democrat FOOL???

Because Barack Obama is the most demon-possessed FOOL who has EVER LIVED, we are now seeing the worst refugee crisis in the entire recorded history of planet earth.

No, Barack Obama is NOTHING like George Bush.

And the Democrat Party is the party of Satan himself.  And Satan is laughing and laughing and maniacally laughing as evil EXPLODES because he owns the soul of every single Democrat.  And that is why these sodomy-worshiping baby butchering Marxists are one day going to share Satan’s ultimate eternal destiny.

So just to recap, Democrats who demonically, treacherously and in fact treasonously betrayed and back-stabled their commander-in-chief and the troops they had voted to authorized to fight under him before they abandoned their duty are cowards and liars of the very lowest sort to now try to argue that they are the ones who are the true bearers of Bush’s mantle.

 

Meet The REAL ‘Best Recruiter’ For ISIS: Hillary Clinton (I Am So Beyond Sick Of This ‘PLEASE Don’t Offend Muslims!’ PC Poop)

December 23, 2015

During the last debate Hillary Clinton said some flat-out lies.  Here was one of the winners that even the leftist-oriented Politifact ruled to be downright FALSE:

“We also need to make sure that the really discriminatory messages that Trump is sending around the world don’t fall on receptive ears,” Clinton said during the debate. “He is becoming ISIS’s best recruiter. They are going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists.”

In their very final words under “Our Ruling” they conclude:

Clinton said that ISIS is “going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists.”

We were unable to find any evidence to support this. The Clinton campaign did not provide any evidence that this is already happening — only that it could be happening, or that it may in the future. If ISIS was using Trump for recruitment videos, we would expect a frenzy of media coverage over it. We rate this claim False.

Okay, so Hillary LIED (again).  You can just shrug your shoulders and say, “What else is new?  The second hand spins around the clock and Hillary Clinton lies every time it moves.  But this particular lie fits a leftist narrative that desperately needs to be exposed and demonized once-for-all for the sake of our very national survival.

First of all, let’s keep going on the massive, appalling hypocrisy of Hillary Clinton’s lie that Donald Trump is somehow a recruiting tool for ISIS and that is a terrible thing.  Hey, let’s assume that Hillary is actually telling the truth (I know, we should trust a diarrhea fart while wearing white pants more than anything Hillary says) about Donald Trump being a recruiting tool for jihadists.  Let’s see who ELSE fits that illustrious company of the “offended ISIS” hall of shame:

While there is no Islamic State video featuring Donald Trump, ironically Islamic State does use videos featuring Bill Clinton as a recruitment tool.

Image credit: Live Leak Video

Image credit: Live Leak Video

His image is used on Islamic State videos to represent the immorality of America – a place where the president has sex in the oval office with his intern. Islamic State calls Hillary’s husband “the Fornicator-in-Chief.”

How embarrassing to Hillary. It’s just lucky Islamic State doesn’t know about all the rumors and charges that Bill sexually harassed and even raped women and traveled three times to “Orgy Island” to visit his friend Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender. All of those charges make Hillary’s husband one of the greatest recruiting tools in Islamic State history.

Okay, so oops.  The only recruiting tool we find IS HER OWN DAMN HUSBAND AND BELOVED DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT.  And Bill Clinton isn’t the “best recruiter” for ISIS because of his warlike stance against Muslims or his harsh rhetoric; nope; he’s their best recruiter because he was a morally-depraved sex offender.  Which ought to communicate volumes about just what a great recruiting tool the Democrat Party is in their radical and evil imposition of homosexual perversion upon America.

But let’s return to Trump for a moment, since Hillary wants that so much.

Trump the insult dog mocked Hillary Clinton from that very same debate leaving at the commercial break and then showing up well after the debate resumed: “Where did she go?”

I don’t know.  Maybe she was going on her very favorite jihadi sites and desperately fact-checking ISIS videos?

You’ve got to love liberals demonizing Trump for calling out what they say is such an illegitimate and trivial thing.  You know, like when Democrats mocked and demonized Marco Rubio for drinking water last year.  You’ve got to just love the demon-possessed left when somebody takes a page from their roach play book and they whine about it.  But hey, Democrat: if you can mock somebody for drinking too much water, we can surely mock somebody for what they do after they drink too much damn water.

But I digress.  Let me refocus on the fundamental issue here: being a recruiting tool for ISIS and how awful that supposedly therefore is.

Do you have ANY idea what would be the ULTIMATE recruiting tool for ISIS?  Let me tell you in three words:

A WOMAN PRESIDENT.

Women, according to the Islam that Democrats say is so peaceful and so wonderful, are supposed to look like this:

Let me contrast this traditional Islamic view of women with tree-hugging environmentalist Democrat women from uber-liberal UC Berkeley University:

Tree-Hugging Liberal Naked Women

Let’s play “Where’s Waldo?”  Can you spot the object in the above picture that might offend Muslims?

I mean, where are you hijabs, girls?  And you came from a college where you were studying like only a man ought to be allowed to do?  And I KNOW you didn’t drive a car to get to that tree you’re hugging!

And you cockroach hypocrite Democrat fascists who are SO afraid of “offending Muslims” never gave so much as ONE NANOSECOND of thought to offending Christians with your “Piss Christ” and your “Holy Virgin Mary” and all the other cultural affronts that you have so routinely punched us in the face with.  Oh, no, we were just people to marginalize and demonize by Obama.  Why is that, you hypocrites without shame, without honor, without decency, without any kind of integrity or virtue?

Why is it that your cockroach values honor an incredibly violent warmonger like Mohammad but continually demonize the followers of Jesus who prophesied, “If they hate you, know that they hated Me first.”

I’m not just talking about “ISIS” here, either: I am talking about Muslims in damn near ANY Muslim country such as our “dear friends” in Saudi Arabia.

So allow me to point out that a woman president would be the ULTIMATE INSULT to Islam.  Just as a woman Secretary of State was a naked insult to a religion that really doesn’t want women showing their damn ankles, driving a car, getting an education, being allowed to vote, being allowed to testify that they were just raped, let alone wielding political power over them.

You want to give Muslims something to “radicalize” over?  You want to be “ISIS’ best recruiter”?  I’ll tell you how YOU can do it, Democrat: vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And while you’re at it, if you’re a Democrat woman, put on your damn clothes, put on your full hijab, drop out of school, stop driving your damn car (which your religion of environmentalism also ought to make you do, hypocrite!) and stay locked up in your house unless you have a male relative who will accompany you.  Because if you don’t do ALL of these things, welcome to the hall of shame of those who serve as “ISIS’ best recruiter.”

Hey, here’s another image: can you see what might offend Islam here?:

Obama White House lights up to celebrate gay marriage - Copy

Gosh, I can’t spot a darn thing.  Oh, wait: Islam very specifically condemns homosexuality and calls for the death of homosexuals and anyone who condones it.  You know, like Obama.  Like Hillary Clinton.

So, hypocrite liberal, if you haven’t stoned a homosexual today, YOU ARE ISIS’ BEST RECRUITER.

I think about pornography and the liberal judges refusing to censor it.  Pornography has now utterly EXPLODED on the internet and the spirit of pornography is a vicious slap in the face to ANYONE who in any way, shape or form harbors any kind of moral or religious values.

You don’t think your porn radicalizes Muslims, Democrat???

Or how about this one, liberal.  A Muslim cleric once pointed out:

When you see some people here dressed in American-style clothes, you are seeing the bullets of the West.”

WHO is making those clothes, liberal?  Are you truly so damn demon-possessed that you think REPUBLICANS are pumping out and pimping Hollywood culture???

Everything you do, liberal, EVERYTHING you do, Democrat, is a bullet aimed at Islam.  And they are shooting back at your version of “Piss Christ” poured on them in the form of your God-damned “values.”

My point here is very simple, Democrat: if it is such a horrifying thing to in any way insult Islam or offend Muslims, etc., THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP DOING IT???

Personally, I don’t give one flying RIP about offending Islam.  But then again, I am not a vile, cockroach hypocrite like every single Democrat on planet earth is, either.

There are values that are worth standing up for against anyone or anything.

If Muslims want to get offended by my values, then allow me to let this little kitty speak for how I feel.

Because unlike Democrats, I am actually capable of the moral virtue of CONSISTENCY.  I don’t demonize people for doing something while I’m doing it about a thousand times worse at the very moment I’m demonizing them for doing what I’m doing.

I have pointed out the FACT – the blatant HISTORIC FACT – that Islam has a pathological problem with violence.  We desperately need to confront Islam and Muslims on that FACT.

If we do not deal with the RELIGIOUS GROUNDS for the violence that is pouring out of Islam, we will NEVER have ANYTHING but unending war that will last beyond the dust that our Western civilization will become.  We HAVE to call out the TRUTH and be willing to STAND for that truth and FIGHT for it.

Or we need to surrender, to bear our heads to the scimitar, to welcome sharia law as our governing authority.

Which do you prefer?

You Democrats are ROACHES.  You sit there and whine and slander me because I’m “offending Muslims” and “radicalizing” them and “giving ISIL what they want.”

Terrorism has SKYROCKETED under Obama and his Democrat policies of craven cowardice.  President George W. Bush wisely predicted what would happen if a fool like Obama was elected and what Bush predicted has come to passTerrorism deaths have QUADRUPLED under Obama and when the statistics come out next year they will easily more than have QUINTUPLED.  We just saw more US soldiers murdered by terrorists in Afghanistan – Obama’s response being to go golfing AGAIN – and US military deaths in Afghanistan had ALREADY skyrocketed under Obama because Obama emboldened the enemy with a plan for withdrawal (surrender).  At home, the very mass shootings Obama keeps demagoguing have skyrocketed 700% under his ROACH rule.  Obama has proven that “ISIS’ best recruiter” is WEAKNESS and lack of resolve before Islamic terrorism and the religious values that inspire it.

Hey, you turds: if Islamic State wants me to condemn Islam because it helps them recruit they just as much want YOU to serve as the ultimate recruiting tool by offending everything that Islam stands for with your perverted leftist “values.”

So for the sake of everything that has any integrity whatsoever, please either stop bitching about this “ISIS’ best recruiter” crap or abolish the Democrat Party as the ultimate insult to Islam that it is.

Me, I’m going to keep standing up for the truth, and for what is truly right.  And I frankly don’t care who I offend while I’m at it.

 

 

 

 

 

‘Most Hated CEO In America’ Who Skyrocketed Price Of HIV Drug WAS A DEMOCRAT WHO DONATED TENS OF THOUSANDS TO DEMOCRATS

December 21, 2015

You listen to the Democrats debate (okay, the three of you who do, given that the DNC has done EVERYTHING to protect their Fuehrer, Hillary Clinton, from any scrutiny by sandwiching debates into THE worst time slots – for example, the first Saturday night of Christmas Vacation, the next one being on a night with two NFL playoff games) and you hear the Democrat candidates utterly fail to explain things such as:

With all of those questions that Democrats don’t have to give a fig about answering and any “answer” they give would be in a debate that the DNC has intentionally done everything possible to prevent anyone from wanting to watch, anyway (see here and here), something interesting has emerged:

Is it REALLY “evil Republican corporations” that are screwing you, America?

Nope.

Let’s look at a truly horrible man:

Martin Shkreli: The ‘most hated man in America’ is raising the price of another form of drug
The news comes just after he raises the price of an effective HIV drug by more than 5000 per cent 
Will Grice ||
Saturday 12 December 2015|

The man who increased the cost of an effective HIV drug by 5,500 per cent has now increased the price of another form of medicine.

Martin Shkreli has now increased the price of a medicine used to treat Chagas disease, a parasitic infection that can cause heart failure.

Mr Shkreli’s company, Turing Pharmacuticals, previously acquired the rights to the anti-HIV drug, Daraprim, before increasing the price from $13.50 to  $700.

This time Mr Shkreli has bought a majority share in KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, allowing him to apply for exclusive selling rights to KaloBios’ benznidazole, a common drug used to treat Chigas in South America, where it is very prevelant.

It is reported by the New York Times that benznidazole currently costs between $50 to $100 for two months worth of treatment.

However the New York Times believe that the cost could soon be similar to that of a hepatitis C drug, which costs anywhere between $60,000 and $100,000 per course of treatment.

It is estimated 300,000 in the United States have Chagas disease

So here – and certainly in the demonization of Democrats be they Obama or Hillary Clinton – have the epitomy of everything that is wrong with corporate America.

The news has trickled out (the propaganda media doing everything possible to keep a lid on yet another giant Democrat scandal).  But back in September this:

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Commitee took $33,400 from Big Pharma’s big jerk Martin Shkreli

You may have read about Turing Pharmaceuticals owner Martin Shkreli being a total jerk on social media in response to his company raising the price of Daraprim, a drug used to treat toxoplasmosis, a medical condition that can be fatal to people with AIDS and developing fetuses, from $13.50/pill to a whopping $750/pill. If not, you can read about it here.

However, when I was looking on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) website about political donations that Martin Shkreli made, I managed to find one political donation that I am 100% certain is of Turing Pharmaceuticals’s Martin Shkreli, and that is a $33,400 donation that Shkreli made to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) on July 18th of this year

The leftist organization Move On made it official:

Martin Shkreli, the hedge fund manager and Turing Pharmaceuticals owner who claimed that raising the price of Daraprim, a medication used to treat toxoplasmosis, a medical condition that can be fatal for people with AIDS, from $13.50/pill to a whopping $750/pill would be a “great thing for society”, donated $33,400 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC).

In light of Shkreli’s overt greed and attacks against those who oppose price-gouging in the prescription drug industry, we, the signatories of this petition, call for the DSCC to donate $33,400 to charity.

And another leftwing operation also reported the following:

“Most Hated Man in America” Martin Shkreli Was Just Arrested for Alleged Securities Fraud
—By Inae Oh | Thu Dec. 17, 2015 8:46 AM EST
Martin Shkreli, the 32-year-old pharmaceuticals executive who landed in the news in September for price-gouging a life-saving drug by a staggering 5,000 percent, was arrested on Thursday for alleged securities fraud.

Bloomberg reports federal agents arrested the Turing CEO at his Manhattan home. He is now being accused of taking money from a previous drug company he founded in 2011, Retrophin Inc., to cover unrelated debts.

The arrest comes just months after reports first surfaced accusing Shkreli of hiking the price of Daraprim, a parasite-killing drug used to treat patients with HIV or cancer, from $13.50 to $750 per pill. Outrage over the price hike prompted multiple headlines declaring him the “most hated man in America.”

Shkreli soon promised to drop the drug’s price to a “point that is more affordable” and that would allow the company to make a “very small profit.” It became quickly apparent, however, that he never intended to follow through on that promise…

So let’s just PLEASE dispense with the cockroach liberal rhetoric that the massive escalation of healthcare costs is somehow due to “Republican greed.”

You desperately need to understand that ultimately “Democrats” – which I rightly claim stands for “DEMOn-possessed bureauCRATS” – are FASCISTS.  And when you consider the fascist economic model, you will see why I say that.  Wikipedia points out that:

An inherent aspect of fascist economies was economic dirigisme,[4] meaning an economy where the government exerts strong directive influence over investment, as opposed to having a merely regulatory role. In general, apart from the nationalizations of some industries, fascist economies were based on private individuals being allowed property and private initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state.[5]

The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics provides this:

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.

Liberal intellectuals dishonestly try to claim that “fascism” and “Nazism” were somehow “right wing” or “conservative” and they are just flat-out LIARS.  And in point of fact these academics are actually merely Marxist plants who are doing nothing more than mouthing the official party line of hard-core STALINISTS:

“The influence of Marxist scholarship has severely distorted our understanding of fascism.  Communism and fascism were rival brands of socialism.  Whereas Marxist socialism is predicated on an international class struggle, fascist national socialism promoted a socialism centered in national unity.  [And in fact, Both movements were “revolutionary socialist ideologies.”  Going on,] Both communists and fascists opposed the bourgeoisie.  Both attacked the conservatives.  Both were mass movements, which had special appeal for the intelligentsia, students, and artists, as well as workers.  Both favored strong centralized governments and rejected the free economy and the ideals of individual liberty.  [And finally,] Fascists saw themselves as being neither of the right nor the left.  They believed that they constituted a third force synthesizing the best of both extremes” [Gene Edward Veith, Jr., Modern Fascism: Liquidating the Judeo-Christian Worldview, p. 26].

In other words, to be a “fascist” is to be a “socialist” and to be a “socialist” is to be a damn LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT.  If you are a “Democrat,” you are by definition someone who wants to use government power to impose winners and losers rather than allowing any free market laissez-faire system to do that; you are in favor of “requiring” businesses to jump through your hoops in order to implicitly attain control over the means of production; you want a planned society with the façade appearance of a free market.  In other words, if you are a Democrat, you are a fascist and you are just either too dishonest or too damn stupid to admit it.

I’m not merely pointing out the fact that the worst corporate turd who stands for everything the Democrat Party claims to hate is a hard-core Democrat; I’m pointing out that everything about the entire Democrat-fascist philosophy is oriented toward giving birth to turds like Shkreli.

But most people are never really going to know this because they have become apathetic sheep and because the mainstream media as the propaganda machine of the Democrat Party does not want you to know this.

I am watching a demonic-delusion being passed over the American people.  Terrorism UNDER OBAMA skyrocketed 150% the first five years of his administration between 2009 and 2013.  That skyrocketing rate turned into a rocket-ship rate as terrorism under Obama soared 81% last year over 2013.  UNDER OBAMA, murders from terrorism quadrupled to this point.  And whether you’re talking about terrorist attacks or the deaths from those attacks, I guarantee you that you haven’t seen ANYTHING yet as both EXPLODED this year over last.

UNDER Obama, the international refugee crisis has absolutely EXPLODED.  We have literally never seen more refugees at any time in the entire documented history of the human race.

But what do Democrats do?  They blame Bush, they say it’s all Republicans’ fault; and militantLY and wickedly refuse to consider the calamitous results of THEIR policies as Obama pursued a policy that Republicans have stated for YEARS would lead to catastrophe and which have clearly led to catastrophe just as they rightly predicted.

And they’re trying to do the same damn thing with the economy, with jobs, with wages, with income inequality, that they’ve wickedly done with foreign policy.

Literally, THE MORE THEY FAIL, THE MORE THEY THINK THEY SHOULD BE GIVEN EVEN MORE TOTAL GOVERNMENT POWER TO FAIL STILL MORE.

Obama Invites Muslim Radicals Into United States: ‘Welcome To America! We Hope You Enjoy Your Glorious Jihad!’

December 10, 2015

As we speak, Barack Obama is rigidly demanding that the United States accept a minimum of 10,000 Syrian refugees.

The other Democrats in the presidential field, including most ominously Hillary Clinton, argues that we should bring in 65,000 Syrian refugees.  Just for starters.

Barack Obama savagely mocked and demonized Republicans who basically said, “Hold the hell on there” and pointing out that we have absolutely ZERO way of validating any of these people flooding out of Syria because of Obama’s epic fail due to his refusal to even acknowledge a war on terror, let alone actually fight it.

Obama claimed that the Syrian refugees constituted “widows and orphans.”  Because after all he’s a wicked liar who loves taking cheap shots.

Of course, ALL of Obama’s talking points have now been proven to have been outright lies.  Obama just claimed that Islamic State was “contained.” Literally hours before they unleashed a devastating terrorist attack in Paris.  Right.  His own Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and now his own Secretary of Defense have publicly stated, like HELL they are.

How about this one Obama promised us on December 2 that was being taped AS THE SAN BERNARDINO ATTACK WAS HAPPENING:

Washington (CNN)President Barack Obama said in an interview that aired Thursday that he is confident the U.S. is safe from a Paris-style attack from ISIS and that American law enforcement is well equipped to protect the nation during the holidays.

“ISIL will not pose an existential threat to us. They are a dangerous organization like al Qaeda was, but we have hardened our defenses,” Obama told CBS. “The American people should feel confident that, you know, we are going to be able to defend ourselves and make sure that, you know, we have a good holiday and go about our lives.”

Yeah, right, you lying fool turd.  There are 35 people who are either dead or almost ended dead who would beg to differ with your frankly idiotic assessment.

These things follow Obama claiming – FALSELY and DISHONESTLY claiming – that Islamic State was “JayVee” even AFTER they had captured entire cities on the way to establishing the caliphate Obama allowed them to build.  “You didn’t build that,” Obama said, smearing the small businesses and claiming government actually builds everything.  Okay, fine, ISIS didn’t build their caliphate; OBAMA DID.  Before that, Obama was outright lying to the American people prior to the 2012 election falsely claiming that his policies had terrorists on the run when we now now that the truth was the exact OPPOSITE.

Obama’s own FBI director is forced to admit this tragic reality about terrorists coming into the United States under Obama:

COMEY: “Our ability to monitor them has not kept pace. In fact, it is going in the wrong direction. So, our ability to find people hiding in the United States looking to do bad things to root out all kinds of organized criminal factors is steadily being impaired. That’s the problem.”

Obama mocked over “widows and orphans.”

Hey, Obama.   Tashfeen Malik was a “widow” in the moments before she went down in a hail of gunfire trying to murder as many police as possible.  She left behind an “orphan,” a UNITED STATES CITIZEN thanks to Obama, who will now be raised by a vicious and highly radicalized family.

So, yeah, I’m scared of widows and orphans.  Because thanks to Obama, we have “widows” murdering us and little “Barack Hussein Obama II” being raised to murder us in the future.

We already HAD an attack in Paris in which an Islamic State terrorist with a SYRIAN PASSPORT took part in a massive terror attack (that Obama assured us couldn’t happen here):

One of the men who attacked Paris held an emergency passport or similar document, according to an unnamed French senator who was briefed by the French Ministry of the Interior. The senator told CNN the bomber falsely declared himself to be a Syrian named Ahmad al Muhammad, born on September 10, 1990, and was allowed to enter Greece on October 3. From there he moved to Macedonia, then Serbia and Croatia, where he registered in the Opatovac refugee camp, the lawmaker said. Eventually, he made his way to Paris, where he was one of three men who blew themselves up at the Stade de France.

Now we have a terrorist – a TERRORIST WHO WAS ALREADY DREAMING OF JIHAD WHEN OBAMA INVITED HER INTO AMERICA – who Obama didn’t even bother to VET:

The FBI Director James Comey has admitted that the two San Bernardino terrorists showed signs of radicalization prior to Tashfeen Malik’s acceptance into the United States on a “fiancé” visa. Comey notes that Malik showed signs of radicalization as far back as 2013 but was still admitted into the United States as the FBI missed the warning signs when approving the terrorist’s visa. Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, would go on to kill 14 people and injure 21 by opening fire on San Bernardino County Health Department Christmas party.

Among other things, Tashfeen Malik gave a bogus address that didn’t even EXIST.  She attended a radical school.  She had already expressed radical views online BEFORE coming to America.  But she was allowed to sail right through the pathetic screening process.  And once in America they began looking up terrorist websites, contacting terrorists, pretty much do everything but put a giant banner on the roof of their house that read “We are TERRORISTS.”  But it’s doubtful even that would have got the authorities’ attention given how incompetent Obama is.

And then let’s just conduct a smell test: this woman with a radicalized background from Pakistan who travelled to Saudi Arabia goes on some Muslim internet dating site to find a likeminded “American” who shared her love of jihad.  And she “online dated” a man with whom she has no connection whatsoever.  You know, when she’d never dated in her life and wouldn’t even show her rather homely face.

But what the hell: Obama said, “C’mon in, folks!”

And just to make it even BETTER, Obama and his libturd pal Jerry Brown give the husband a government job as a health inspector so he could go into any damn school he wanted where our KIDS are.  He could walk into our restaurants.  Meanwhile, Tashfeen was studying to be a pharmacist so she could play with our medication.  You can imagine Democrats would have given her a great government job, too.

We’re actually probably lucky: they both could have killed hundreds or even THOUSANDS of Americans by poisoning us.  Thank Allah it wasn’t a violent enough way to kill us.  At least, it isn’t YET.

The bottom line is this: we had about a thousand times better chance to properly vet and recognize Tashfeen Malik than we do ANY of the thousands of “Syrian refugees” for whom we have ZERO WAY to validate their documents.  We have ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE of knowing who these people are.  Syria is not only an enemy state with whom we have no relations whatsoever; it is a failed state whose government systems have fundamentally broken down.

In all probability, Islamic State has seized its own passport printing machine and has blank passports so they can authenticate their terrorists.  You know, if Obama even BOTHERS to look at the passports given the fact that he utterly failed to keep terrorist jihadist Tashfeen Malik out of America even though she only came here to murder as many of us as she could.

It is also very likely that Islamic State has long-since infiltrated terrorists into America with those aforementioned Syrian passports that we are only now beginning to become stupidly aware of were being printed for more than a year and a half now.

But amazingly, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton not only don’t care, but literally demand tens of thousands more possible terrorists to flood into America.

Call it murder by political correctness.  Call it “retroactive abortion by jihad.”  Because a terrorist woman has “the right to choose,” after all.

And to make it even crazier and more evil, Obama and Democrats not only demand that we bring terrorists into America in the name of political correctness, but also that we strip away the American people’s constitutional right to protect themselves and their families FROM these terrorists.

Add to that that Obama Democrats have now turned our police into murder suspects.  They are staying in their cars because Democrats riot every time they shoot a criminal who happens to be black.  Mobs of young people with their smart phone cameras are surrounding the police who DO try to get out their cars as they scream taunts and threats.  It’s going to get easier and easier for terrorists to attack and do a lot of damage before they’re finally gunned down because Obama breathed life into the vile “Black Lives Matter” movement that cynically couldn’t care LESS about the OTHER 99 percent of the black lives that are murdered by other black people in liberal cities.

And then there is the fact that in the San Bernardino terrorist massacre, we had the chance to prevent the attack from even happening because a neighborhood witness saw some really bizarre things going on in Farook’s garage.  But Obama and Democrats – now including Obama’s Attorney General – intimidated her from wanting to “profile” and “be a racist.”  And knowing that a school was viciously attacked by Obama because they detained a Muslim kid who had made a clock in a suitcase that looked EXACTLY like a bomb, YOU’D BETTER SHUT THE HELL UP.

Obama has miserably failed to keep Americans safe, but that’s okay; because now he’s going to try to make it impossible for the American people to keep themselves safe.

Are you a liberal and don’t like guns?  Then you are a psychotic demoniac fool for not having screamed for Obama’s impeachment: more than 100 MILLION guns have been sold as a result of his fool presidency as Obama has panicked tens of millions of Americans into buying guns.  Between the fact that Barack Obama personally epitomizes a direct threat to the freedom of the American people and due to the fact that Obama has utterly failed to keep us safe from external threats, Barack Obama is the gun salesman of the CENTURY.

Rest assured Obama is going to do everything that the spirit of fascism in America can do to take away your rights and your ability to protect your rights.

As a result of Obama’s failed presidency, let me quote the New York Times as it explores why Donald Trump is rising:

“Americans are more fearful about the likelihood of another terrorist attack than at any other time since the weeks after Sept. 11, 2001, a gnawing sense of dread…”

The problem with Democrats is that they live in a DELUSION and have NO contact with the actual real world.  It literally doesn’t matter to them if the cockroach fecal matter they have in place of brains produces THE EXACT OPPOSITE EFFECT from what they intend.

Everything Obama came into office declaring about terrorism was either an outright lie or the belief of a naïve fool.  In fact, terrorism has SKYROCKETED BECAUSE WE ELECTED OBAMA.  We watched terrorism skyrocket between the day Obama took office and 2014.  But we aint seen NOTHIN’ yet: terrorism skyrocketed ANOTHER 81% since 2014.  And you watch how it explodes this year over last year.  We are truly in trouble because this blathering fool we foolishly chose to lead us into delusion and then into hell.

 

 

 

Once Again, We Find That Hillary Clinton Belongs In PRISON For Treason And Corruption – As Does Much Of The Obama Administration

December 2, 2015

Hillary Clinton’s emails once again show how truly treasonous and corrupt this woman is and how beyond dishonest and corrupt Democrats have become.

Here is the new story out on how the State Department is doing damn near everything it can to cover-up for Hillary Clinton’s CRIMINAL behavior:

Sources: Clinton email markings changed to hide classified info
By  Catherine Herridge
·Published September 01, 2015
· FoxNews.com

At least four classified Hillary Clinton emails had their markings changed to a category that shields the content from Congress and the public, Fox News has learned, in what State Department whistleblowers believed to be an effort to hide the true extent of classified information on the former secretary of state’s server.

The changes, which came to light after the first tranche of 296 Benghazi emails was released in May, was confirmed by two sources — one congressional, the other intelligence. The four emails originally were marked classified after a review by career officials at the State Department. But after a second review by the department’s legal office, the designation was switched to “B5” — also known as “deliberative process,” which refers to internal deliberations by the Executive Branch. Such discussions are exempt from public release.

The B5 coding has the effect, according to a congressional source, of dropping the email content “down a deep black hole.”

The four mails are separate and distinct from another group of emails identified by the Intelligence Community Inspector General as containing two messages with “Top Secret”  information.

A congressional source told Fox that a July 23rd letter to Congress from the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community made passing reference to the incident in the recommendations “…that State FOIA officials implement a dispute resolution process in regard to differences of opinion about classification levels and exemptions. State has not yet provided sufficient information for us to close this recommendations.”

According to recent congressional testimony, at least one of the lawyers in the office where the changes were made is Catherine “Kate” Duval, who was at the IRS during the Lois Lerner e-mail scandal and now handles the release of documents to the Benghazi select committee. Duval once worked for the same firm as Clinton’s private attorney David Kendall.

Fox News is told there were internal department complaints that Duval, and a second lawyer also linked to Kendall, gave at the very least the appearance of a conflict of interest during the email review. A State Department spokesman did not dispute the basic facts of the incident, confirming to Fox News the disagreement over the four classified emails as well as the internal complaints. But the spokesman said the concerns were unfounded.

The whistleblowers told intelligence community officials that they did not agree with the B5 changes, and the changes had the effect of shielding the full extent of classified content on the server. The incident was referenced in a Washington Times report mid-August, but this is the first time fuller details have been available. Because the emails are now marked B5, or deliberative, it is impossible to know the content and relevance to the congressional and FBI investigations.

The internal State Department disagreement was so significant that it rose to the level of Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy, who is deeply involved in the email controversy, as Clinton’s server arrangement required his formal signoff or tacit approval. Asked who signed off on the private server on Tuesday, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, “I personally don’t know.”

Conservative group Judicial Watch, which has more than a dozen civil suits in federal courts, is now seeking a deposition of Kennedy in a case scrutinizing Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s controversial status as a special government employee (SGE). “All these issues fall under his responsibility,” Judicial Watch investigator Chris Farrell said.

Asked to respond to the allegations, State Department spokesman John Kirby said, “the Department has complete confidence that its attorneys — who are almost exclusively career Department lawyers — perform to the highest professional and ethical standards, including in connection with the review and release of Secretary Clinton’s emails.” A State Department official added that the lawyers do not have the final say on the codes, emphasizing it is a “multi-step review.”

On the appearance of a conflict of interest, Kirby defended Duval as “an exceptional professional and has the Department’s utmost confidence … No one at the Department should, in addition to this burden, have her integrity or her excellent work ethic impugned.”  And on the connection to Clinton attorney Kendall, “the mere fact of working at a firm does not itself constitute a conflict of interest.  This is a large firm, and we are not aware that any counsel working on Clinton-related matters at the Department did so prior to joining the Department.”

A search of this week’s 7,000-page release found 694 emails with the B5 coding, about 10 percent of the total.

Fox News’ Pamela Browne contributed to this report.

Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent.

What’s funny, to begin with, is how the State Department is refusing to deal with the media and saying they’re only going to cooperate or talk with Congress WHILE AT THE SAME TIME DOING EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO PREVENT CONGRESS FROM SEEING ANYTHING.

Now “the most transparent administration in history” is actively and openly trying to dump as much evidence of their wrongdoing as possible down a bureaucratic “black hole” to prevent ANY transparency or accountability whatsoever.  Obama is actually in point of fact WORSE THAN NIXON.  And it is simply a DOCUMENTED FACT THAT OBAMA IS THE WORST IN HISTORY AT PREVENTING ANY TRANSPARENCY WHATSOEVER.

It has already been DOCUMENTED that Hillary Clinton had someone on her staff ILLEGALLY wipe out the classification markers so she could have the “talking point” that there was no classification on the classified email she was bandying around for the Russians and the Chinese and the North Koreans to read at will.  The Los Angeles Times reported:

he Department of Justice said it is weighing whether to launch its own investigation after the inspector general for intelligence agencies notified the agency that classified information that went through the account appeared to have been mishandled. Administration officials and investigators declined to share details about the emails. But in a separate memo to lawmakers, the inspector general said that a review of just 40 of the 30,000 emails from the Clinton server found that four had information that should have been marked and handled as classified.

Clinton has made many assurances in recent months that she did not send or receive classified information on her personal server. Her campaign says the material in question had not been specifically marked as classified and, thus, Clinton broke no rules. The inspector general disputed that characterization in a statement late Friday, saying that the information in the emails was classified at the time, even if it wasn’t marked as such, and shouldn’t have been transmitted on a personal email system.

Even so, the revelation was an uncomfortable one for the candidate. And national security experts said the disclosure that that material that should have been marked classified made its way to Clinton’s personal email account at the very least fuels legitimate speculation about how the server was used.

“It tells us why this was such a bad idea,” said Stewart A. Baker, a former general counsel to the National Security Agency now in private practice. “It raises questions.”

Among them, Baker said, was whether staffers deliberately avoided marking sensitive emails to Clinton as classified so they could sidestep the bureaucrats who handle transmission of such material.

“She skipped the government circles and nobody was overseeing this and nobody was saying, ‘This info should not be on this system,’” Baker said. “If anything, there was an incentive for people to cross the line without making clear they were doing so.”

I pointed that article out and its obvious ramifications back in an article I wrote in September of this year.  Somebody clearly stripped the classification markers – an act of TREASON – to give Hillary Clinton “plausible deniability.”  Period.  We’ve known for MONTHS that criminal acts were committed by Hillary Clinton and by her staff of witches and warlocks.

The second thing – and frankly Herridge should have brought this little factoid up in her above article – is that THE STATE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO UNILATERALLY ALTER THE CLASSIFICATION OF A DOCUMENT FROM ANOTHER AGENCY, SUCH AS THE CIA.

It is NOT the State Department’s information; it is the CIA’s information that the CIA shared with the State Department.

I’ll get to how incredibly DANGEROUS to our nation’s security this Democrat trick is later.  But for now, let me continue on Hillary Clinton’s criminality and now the entire Obama State Department’s criminal cover-up of the clear future Democrat nominee’s criminality.

An article from the Daily Beast back in July put it this way:

Classified emails stored on Hillary Clinton’s private computer server contained information from five U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA and NSA, McClatchy reported Thursday. One of the emails about the 2012 Benghazi consulate attack was even released to the public by the State Department in May despite it being classified. That email contained information from the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which uses spy satellites. Four other emails contained info from the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which oversees all intelligence agencies. The inspector general for the intelligence community found the five classified emails out of a sample of 40 from the 30,000 emails Clinton gave to the State Department.

But perhaps the most troubling element in the McClatchy story is the assertion that “the State Department so far has refused to grant the intelligence-community inspector general access to the entire batch of emails on jurisdictional grounds.”

As Herridge reports, that number of “five” emails has now exploded into nearly 700.

Similarly, the Washington Times back in August of this year reported:

State is also refusing to accept the intelligence IG’s finding that some emails in a limited sample of Mrs. Clinton’s 30,000 delivered to State contained top secret material. The IG said it was specially compartmentalized to signify it pertained to communications intercepts and to military satellite imagery and, or, intercepts.

Said Mr. Toner on Wednesday “We have not seen anything at the TS [top secret] level yet.”

This directly contradicts a memo sent on Tuesday by I. Charles McCullough III, the IG for the intelligence community, which includes 17 agencies.

The memo to House and Senate Intelligence committee leaders said an unspecified number of Clinton emails contained top secret information.

Mr. Toner told reporters, “We’re working with the director of national intelligence to resolve whether in fact this material is actually classified.”

Mr. McCullough, and his counter part at State, Steven Linick, took the extraordinary step on July 24 of issuing a joint statement that questioned that defense.

“These emails contained classified information when they were generated and, according to IC classification officials, that information remains classified today,” they said.

They directly rebutted previous State Department statements that the material is classified today, but not when in sat in her server, while she was secretary of State. She left State in 2013 and is now the Democratic Party frontrunner for the presidential nomination.

Mr. McCullough sent a referral to the FBI. Agents are now investigating the security breach and took possession of Mrs. Clinton’s server, which she had wiped clean after selecting the 30,000 emails.

What we are seeing is the entire Obama State Department machine directly and criminally covering up A CRIME for a PARTISAN POLITICAL REASON to the detriment of our national security.

This is the SAME Obama who very clearly ORDERED his appointees to alter intelligence that didn’t agree with the Obama political narrative.

You start to see the vile, cockroach bureaucrat tactics that Obama is routinely employing to cover up his crimes and the criminality of his thug-underlings:

One of the lawyers present during the review by State’s legal office was government attorney Catherine Duval, who was a key player in the controversy surrounding ex-IRS official Lois Lerner’s missing emails related to the investigation of the agency’s targeting of conservative groups.

Duval, who is now spearheading the release of materials related to the 2012 attack in Benghazi, formerly worked for the same law firm as the Clintons’ private attorney David Kendall.

So we’ve got a DIRECT TIE-IN between the Obama use of the IRS as his own personal “Internal Revenge Service” to target conservatives during an election, along with a direct tie-in between that IRS crime and the Benghazi cover-up.  And now a direct tie-in between Obama’s IRS crimes and the Benghazi cover-up and Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.  And that tie-in directly ties-in to Hillary Clinton PERSONALLY.

Good luck getting to the bottom of anything when the President of the United States is a traitor and a criminal who is aided-and-abetted by traitors and criminals at high levels whom he personally put in their positions.

Now let me point out why this is so incredibly dangerous to national security.  During the Clinton years – and isn’t it funny how history starts to repeat itself – there were walls and barriers and interservice rivalries that prevented information from being exchanged by the various agencies that dealt with intelligence.   That was THE NUMBER ONE THING that came out of the 9/11 Commission Report.

And right now, as we speak, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are doing absolutely everything they possibly can to guarantee that those same walls, barriers and rivalries are created anew so our enemies can attack us while we are totally blind again.  Because right now, under Obama, and under Hillary Clinton, intelligence agencies such as the CIA and NSA absolutely CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT trust other agencies with their intelligence.  So the only alternative is not to share it.

Hillary Clinton all but said to the CIA, the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the Director of National Intelligence, “I frankly don’t give one flying DAMN about you or your intelligence or your sources or your security, and I’m going to use and abuse your product any damn partisan political way I want to.”  With the obvious result being they quit sharing their product as a climate of mistrust dominates.

The Clinton Administration – deliberately and intentionally (and yes, incredibly foolishly) – created a wall that prevented intelligence agencies from sharing what they knew with one another.   Clinton “intentionally erected to prevent intelligence agents from pooling information with their law-enforcement counterparts.”

Now we’ve got a NEW wall built on the very worst kind of mistrust based on Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s partisan political politicking.

And the next massive terrorist attack is inevitable.

And allow me to quote Obama’s “reverend” for 23 years who said “God DAMN America!”

The Leftist Hypocrite Train Continues Chugging Along, Destination Fiery, Agonizing Hell.

November 9, 2015

Rest assured I will get to the Ben Carson story that is all over the place.  Let me warm up to it.

So Carly Fiorina appeared on the View to hold the liberal witches on that program accountable for their shrill attacks against the Republican woman running for president in which, among other things, her face was attacked as a “demented Halloween mask.”

Here was how the View characterized the vicious personal attack against a Republican woman by shrews who have made it abundantly clear that they rabidly hate Republicans:

Co-host Joy Behar was visibly upset that her comments about Fiorina’s face were offensive to the female Republican presidential candidate.

“I don’t get why any candidate is exempt from my comedic jokes,” Behar.

Well, here’s what I don’t get, Behar: why do YOU believe that YOU should be exempt from your awful partisan ideologically rabid attacks???

I don’t have a transcript, but I can accurately sum up Behar’s position thus: she’s a COMEDIAN, you see.  And while Donald Trump should be viciously attacked for saying the SAME EXACT THING that the View said, he’s NOT a comedian.

We call this a double-standard.  We also call it a fascist passive-aggressive tyranny trip by a loathsome jug of fecal matter.

The same View that believes – you know, because they believe they’re “funny” and the rapidly shrinking audience of “the toxic environment” that is The View agree with them – believes that Donald Trump should be shouted down.  I mean, he’s had his own television program that was a hell of a lot more successful than The Poo, but Whoopie Cushion Goldberg and Joyless Behar have decreed that they are funnier than him regardless of what a far larger audience than theirs thinks.  So off with his head.

Do I have the right to speak out about the wickedness of homosexuality?

What if I speak what they call my hatred in a “funny” way.  Do I then?

NO! they shriek.  Absolutely NOT.  This “comedic exemption” where only true “comics” (as defined by the ideological left) means that you’ve got to be funny only in the politically correct manner.

There is no comedic exemption to your fascist views against actual free speech, ye cast of feminist warthogs.  Either we ALL have the right to say what we want to without being attacked for it, or NONE of us do, most especially if you sit on a show that should have been cancelled five years ago.

For the record, Donald Trump is a “comedian” too.  He’s supposed to host the comedy program Saturday Night Live, which proves it.  One of the reasons his attacks against the other Republican candidates work so well is that he pulls them off with a comical flair and brilliant comedic timing.

Donald Trump is a better comic than Whoopie Cushion Goldberg or Joyless Behar have EVER been: his enormous wealth proves it.

But when Donald Trump espouses what he considers “The View,” does he get to say his spiel without criticism?  Not from ideological liberals and not from YOU, Joy Behar, you rabid hypocrite.  Where’s his comedic exemption to the left’s criticism the way you propose you ought to be exempt from the right’s criticism?

But of course, that’s just one of the many examples of stops the Rabid Hypocrite Liberal Choo-Choo makes.  Here’s another one:

The media is going after allegedly false statements that Ben Carson has made about his life the way a type-A personality terrier who thinks it smells a gopher digs holes in the back yard.  The gleeful report from Reuters is “Carson LIED.”

The reality is much more nuanced than the story reveals.  In fact, Ben Carson was “the top ROTC student in the City of Detroit.”  He met with General William Westmoreland, who was one of if not THE most powerful general in the Army, having just returned from command of all US forces in Vietnam.  And according to Carson, Westmoreland promised “the top ROTC student” that if he applied, his application would most certainly be granted.

So the headlines trumpeting Carson “admits fabricating” kind of skip a lot of facts that kind of at least help you understand why Ben Carson would say that he was “accepted” at West Point when all he had to do to have that status was turn in an application that he decided to pass on.

Politico demonstrated to any objective follower of media that it is blatantly partisan in its hithobs.  It walked the story back without every having the decency to admit it got the story wrong or even WAS walking it back.

It’s called “Gotcha.”  And the media plays it best against conservatives, and rarely ever plays it at all against liberals.

Now even Politifact – and you need to understand that while Politifact DOES do good work, it generally “fact checks” from a leftist perspective – acknowledges that Ben Carson is the honest one and Politico is the dishonest one.  They rank his defense as “mostly true” which means that Politico has to be at LEAST “mostly false.”

You find that Politico and much of the left-wing media that reported this story flat-out LIED about what Ben Carson said in order to dishonestly frame him as a liar.  Carson never SAID he’d been admitted to West Point; he never said that he’d been accepted at West Point; what he said was that he was “offered” a full scholarship and the dishonesty the media used to slander him is amazing.

The same Reuters that joyfully trumpeted the “Carson Lied” article called Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi very real pile of dishonesty and lies “the zombie scandal.”  Which is precisely why Marco Rubio in that leftist assassination attempt also known as the CNBC debate caricatured the mainstream media as “the biggest and most powerful super PAC of all” working for the Democrat Party.

I’ll give a couple of examples of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton NEVER being similarly scrutinized for FAR WORSE deceit in their academic careers.  But let me work on another aspect of Hillary Clinton and the mainstream media caught covering for her first.

Hillary Clinton got caught dead-to-rights, red-bloody-handed, smoking-gun-in-her-gunpowder-residue-tested-hands LIE over Benghazi.  There is absolute NO QUESTION AT ALL that Hillary Clinton said one thing to the victims over the caskets containing the murdered bodies of their loved ones one thing and her own daughter and the foreign minister of Egypt another thing.  As part of an overall incredibly cynically dishonest campaign strategy of the Obama administration to lie about what was very clearly a TERRORIST ATTACK AGAINST THE UNITED STATES by “fundamentally transforming” it into a “spontaneous demonstration.”

Let’s look at the timeline:

At the day and time of the attack in Benghazi, literally AS the TERRORIST attack was underway against the US compound, Hillary wrote:

Lied1

Hillary Clinton’s exact words the day of the attack, literally as the attack was underway:

“…there is a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as-Sharia [sic] is claiming responsibility for.”

The very next day after the attack, Hillary wrote to the Egyptian foreign minister and categorically stated:

Lied2

Again, Hillary Clinton’s EXACT WORDS: “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film.  It was a planned attack — not a protest.”

And later that same day, Hillary wrote to her daughter and said:

Lied3

Her exact words again: “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Qaeda-like group.”

So what did Hillary say to the families of the victims literally over the victims’ dead bodies when they returned to America on September 14, 2015:

Tyrone Woods’ father (who took notes about their meeting): “I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand. And she said we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son…’She said — the filmmaker who was responsible for the death of your son’…”

Sean Smith’s mother: “She’s absolutely lying. She told me something entirely different at the casket ceremony. She said it was because of the video.”

Sean Smith’s uncle
: “Mrs. Clinton really has a problem embracing the truth.”

Glen Doherty’s sister: “When I think back now to that day and what she knew, it shows me a lot about her character that she would choose in that moment to basically perpetuate what she knew was untrue.”

THREE FAMILIES out of the four murdered men specifically claim and have consistently claimed from DAY ONE that Hillary Clinton told them that it was a damn Youtube video and NOT the terrorist attack that it is now documented as FACT that she KNEW was the truth.

Now let’s look at some more emails from the State Department the same damn DAY that Hillary Clinton was saying what she KNEW to be an incredibly cynical and depraved LIE to the murdered victims’ families literally over their dead bodies:

It turns out, three days after the Benghazi attack, on Sept. 14, 2012, the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli specifically warned the State Department in an email not to promote the idea that an anti-Muslim YouTube video was the cause of the attack.

The embassy issued this warning for two reasons: one, it was not true. And two, by calling continued attention to the video, anti-American sentiment in Libya was inflamed, where the video had not been a factor to any significant extent.

“[O]ur view at Embassy Tripoli is that we must be cautious in our local messaging with regard to the inflammatory film trailer, adapting it to Libyan conditions,” wrote an embassy official whose name was redacted from the Sept. 14, 2012 email.

“[I]f we post messaging about the video specifically, we may draw unwanted attention to it,” the official said. “And it is becoming increasingly clear that the series of events in Benghazi was much more terrorist attack than a protest which escalated into violence.”

Let’s continue with the unraveling White House timeline and the fact of the most wicked lie imaginable as it unfolded:

In this light, it is worth recalling how many times members of the Obama administration promoted a narrative that was not only apparently a concoction, but also potentially a match set to a tinderbox of anti-American hatred.

September 12: Clinton and President Obama issue statements condemning both the video and the attacks.

September 13: Press Secretary Jay Carney condemns video and violence at a news conference.

September 14: The bodies of slain Americans return to Andrews Air Force Base. Obama again blames the YouTube video.

September 16: U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice appears on Sunday talk shows and says the attacks were provoked by the video, exclusively.

September 25: Obama appears at the United Nations, denouncing “a crude and disgusting video that sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.”

September 27: The “Innocence of Muslims” film-maker Mark Basseley Youseff is arrested and denied bail for a “probation violation.”

Why did the administration go to all this trouble? A memo, sent by Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said that one of the “goals” of Rice’s appearances was “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not in a broader failure of policy.”

Yet, as noted by Pete Hoekstra, former chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, in his new book, “Architects of Disaster: The Destruction of Libya,” the attack in Benghazi was “the culmination of a foreign policy on Islamic terrorism that was grounded in wishful thinking and self-delusion.”

With every revelation, this tragic policy failure is becoming ever clearer.

It is frankly EVIL the way the mainstream media has flocked around Hilary Clinton and said that the day of her testimony before Congress in which her greatest ignominy was factually established was “actually” the greatest day of her political career.  And it is EVIL that the Washington Post subsequently did a quibbling “fact check” about Marco Rubio’s claim that “Hillary Clinton lied” when it is in FACT a FACT that she DID lie.  As it is easy to demonstrate as I just did above.

Hillary Clinton lied and directly participated in a campaign of lies by the most dishonest administration in the history of the republic.

I submit that Marco Rubio’s claim not only exposed the vicious dishonesty of Hillary Clinton but also the vicious ideological propaganda that masquerades as the face of “journalism” today when he said during the vile media hitjob “debate” (there’s NO debate that the CNBC debate was unfair).  Rubio pointed out during that communist show-trial masquerading as a “debate”:

“I know the Democrats have the ultimate Super PAC, it’s called the mainstream media,” Rubio said. “Last week, Hillary Clinton admitted she sent emails to her family saying ‘Hey, this attack in Benghazi was caused by Al qaeda-like elements.’ She spent over a week telling the families of those victims and the American people that it was because of a video. And yet, the mainstream media is saying it was the greatest week in Hillary Clinton’s campaign. It was the week she got exposed as a liar. […] But she has her super PAC helping her out: the American mainstream media.”

Rubio declared the mainstream media the ultimate Super PAC.  And thank you, Washington Post, thank you, Reuters, thank you, CNBC for proving it is true.

But Ben Carson’s so-called “lie” matters to these LIARS????  Again, to put it in credit-card offer terms, from Ben Carson’s perspective, had he turned in an application, he was already pre-approved for an appointment to West Point based on his ROTC-award status and based on a four-star general’s assurances.  So a brilliant young black man who had already shown his stuff in the military universe through ROTC would certainly get.  But he decided not to go, so he didn’t fill out the application.  But he “lied” or “fabricated” because what he said wasn’t completely technically true, screamed the mainstream media.  Even though it turned out that in actual fact Ben Carson HAD NEVER ACTUALLY claimed that he had been admitted to West Point – he merely claimed that he had been offered a full scholarship (which any appointment automatically would have essentially been). And any unbiased reader can readily understand why he would have explained it in that common parlance of “offered a scholarship” versus “offered an appointment.”  It was the MEDIA that lied about this story; not Ben Carson.  But Hillary Clinton’s outright lies about coming under sniper fire when it is a FACT that she lied about that, her outright lies about her family history that all four of her grandparents were immigrants when in FACT only one was, her lie about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary when there is simply no way that could have been true given that when Hillary Clinton was born/named, Sir Edmund Hillary was a nobody, her lie about her daughter being at ground zero on 9/11 when it is a FACT that she was not, etc, none of those lies matter to our elite media class.

How about this one given the fact that supposedly Ben Carson’s “scholarship” is such a travesty of truth: Hillary Clinton actually claimed that she had tried to enlist in the Marines.  And then with NOTHING TO SUBSTANTIATE THAT SHE HAD EVER TRIED TO DO SO, Team Clinton switched the story from Marines to Army.  But there’s no reason to buy that load of manure, either.  But so what if Hillary lies on a far more egregious basis in the span of a single afternoon than Ben Carson ever has in his entire life combined?

What about Barack Obama’s college days?  What about the fact that there is no possible way that a stoner like Obama says he was with the poor grades Obama said he had NEVER would have got into Ivy League schools such as Columbia and Harvard without some kind of serious shenanigans.  And we’re talking about ILLEGAL shenanigans.  What about the fact that Obama’s time at Occidental took place during an incredibly awful grade-inflation scandal?  What about the fact that Obama’s college records are STILL sealed and the media has refused to investigate any of it???

Why is it the same damn leftist propaganda media that is going tooth and claw after Ben Carson has steadfastly stood against any attempt by any body to see or hear the tape of Obama at an incredibly controversial event where PRO-TERRORIST CAUSES were clearly espoused???  The Lost Angeles Slimes has repeatedly now said that we would only find out the truth about Obama over their dead bodies.

How can this same media that is so rabid to protect Obama against the truth being revealed be so rabid to destroy Carson by fabricating their story?

I’ve documented this before, and so only need to copy-and-paste, but leftwing journalists of today come from a very uber-defined belief that they are NOT charged with merely reporting the facts – because they’ve been taught to believe that the unwashed masses are far too stupid to be trusted with the facts – but that their role is to shape mass culture and mass opinion with their superior perspective as our masters:

As icon of leftwing journalists Walter Lippmann put it:

“News and truth are not the same thing and must be clearly distinguished.”

Which of course allows the mainstream media to misrepresent the truth in the guise of reporting “the news” in order to stimulate the public to act “responsibly” NOT out of truth and any true “picture of reality,” but rather out of the journalists’ opinion of what we need to know in order to think or do what the journalist believes the public ought to think or do.

As Walter Lippmann believed:

Walter Lippmann described a “revolution” in “the practice of democracy” as “the manufacture of consent” has become “a self-conscious art and a regular organ of popular government.” This is a natural development when public opinion cannot be trusted: “In the absence of institutions and education by which the environment is so successfully reported that the realities of public life stand out very sharply against self-centered opinion, the common interests very largely elude public opinion entirely, and can be managed only by a specialized class whose personal interests reach beyond the locality,” and are thus able to perceive “the realities.” These are the men of best quality, who alone are capable of social and economic management.

Which gives the mainstream media elite who stand above the rest of us mere mortals the right to serve as “gatekeepers,” and prevent the people from learning anything that might otherwise cause them to discover that conservatives have it right and liberals have it dead wrong.

And as fellow member of the leftwing journalist hall of fame Edward Bernays put it:

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.  Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”

Because what is power if you can’t even manipulate the truth and shape it to serve your agenda?  And if you’re a leftwing liberal progressive journalist – as basically 90 percent of journalists are today – what could be better than being one of the people “who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society” so you can “constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country”???

We live in an age just before the coming of the beast where a spirit of fascism is determined to use the unholy power of wicked government to take over and dominate our lives.  And there are a lot of people who are functioning as priests of this new unholy religion of Government as Savior and Lord and Master.

There are only two paths that this nation can now take: the Auschwitz train ride to hell on earth as we follow the media to Democrat Party fascism and totalitarianism, or literally to hunt down every single Democrat down with dogs and burn them alive.  We’re most definitely not going to do the latter, and so therefore the former is ultimately going to be our fate and the cause of our national doom.  We can’t rid our nation of the living disease that Democrats are, and so like a virus they will continue to infect the host organism of America with cancer until that host collapses and dies an awful death.

The beast is coming.  The beast, a.k.a. the Antichrist, is identified both in Old Testament prophecy (Ezekiel and Daniel) as well as in the New Testament.  There are things going on RIGHT NOW that tell anyone with wisdom that we are truly IN the very last days that these Books prophetically and staggeringly described.  We are in the time just before the War of Gog and Magog described in the last days prophecy of Ezekiel 38.  The two nations described as leading this demonic end-times attack against Israel have NEVER both been where the Book of Ezekiel said they would be – until TODAY as both Russia AND Iran are in Syria to the north of Israel.  I’m not playing games with renamed nations: When Russia was Scythia and when Iran was Persia, these nations were never where they are right now before in all of human history.  But they’re both there together now.  Just as the Bible said would happen in the very last days when it prophesied that these two nations in the last days would lead an all-out attack against Israel leading a host of nations that today are ALL Islamic republics.

The Antichrist will be a “master of dark sentences,” “a master of intrigue.”   This according to the Book of Daniel that prophesied the coming of Alexander the Great a full 200 years before his birth in such terrifyingly accurate prophetic description that skeptics are forced to say that the Book had to have been written after the fact when there is NO evidence that it was and great evidence that it wasn’t.  As just one example, the record of antiquity documents that Alexander somehow read the very prophecies that the skeptics claim weren’t written until after his conquestAlexander became a friend to the Jews whose prophecies had inspired him and given him the confidence that he would in fact succeed in the most grandiose conquest in all of human history, and invited them to Alexandria when he built that city in 331BC.  It was in that very city that the Septuagint – the translation into Alexander’s Greek of the Hebrew Old Testament – was completed.  Getting back to the coming Antichrist, he WILL be the ultimate big-government tyrant that Democrats are so eagerly seeking; he will be the fulfillment of all of their dreams.  Because he – like all liberals – will believe the end justifies the means, he will be the ultimate craftsman of lies and deception.

I actually believe that Ben Carson – who has been one of the three Republicans I have most hoped would emerge as our eventual nominee along with Carly Fiorina and Ted Cruz – will probably be destroyed by this revelation of his less-than-perfect honesty.  Even though, when you look at the whole story, you ought to be able to understand why he said it the way he said it.  The reason is not merely the unholy attack by the mainstream media, but ultimately because Republicans care about honesty and integrity and the truth the way that no Democrat has in very nearly my entire lifetime.  Conservatives don’t put up with dishonest people the way liberals do.  Democrats at this point in this incredibly degenerate party’s history not only don’t mind liars, they DEMAND them.  Their is no honesty or integrity or virtue or decency in their shriveled souls whatsoever.  They have no God; they have only Government to worship.  Jesus said He came to testify to the truth, and everyone who was of the truth listened to Him; Democrats responded with Piss Christ  –

piss fax

And they are STILL responding that way as they piss on The Word of God that Jesus as the Word revered and commissioned.  If Jesus believed it, Democrats believe the exact opposite; if Jesus stood for it, they stand against it.  They are as determined to advance their god – the State – as much as the Islamic radicals are determined to advance their god Allah.  And both gods are the one and same unholy person: the devil.

Hell is coming.  And if you’re a Democrat, if you’re a mass-murdering sodomy worshiper, you’re on the train taking you right to it and right through its gates.

The Demonic Hypocrisy Of Democrats Who Invoke Reagan With The Words, “Why, Even Ronald Reagan [Fill In The Blank].”

November 5, 2015

I don’t know how many times I’ve heard “even Reagan” attacks on Republicans from liberals such as, “Even Reagan raised taxes,” or “Even Reagan granted amnesty to illegal immigrants.”

I mean, Reagan cut the damn taxes, okay?  Can we please stop the bullcrap?  The top rate went from 70% to 28% under the Reagan tax cut which ignited the economy like nothing ever has before or since.  You’ve got to be not only a fool but a DAMNFOOL – which unfortunately is a synonym for “Democrat” – to try to argue that Reagan “raised taxes.”  If some taxes went up, while most taxes went down and the overall tax rate went WAY down, it’s pretty pathetic to cling to the couple of times that Reagan raised some minor tax to try to argue against the FACT that Reagan cut taxes.  And yet the left does it all the time.

I googled the phrase (with quotes) “even Reagan” and got 27,700 hits, including the first one from the New York Slimes titled, “ObamaCare and Reagan.”  The author’s thesis is apparently that Reagan was a confused man who didn’t understand socialism (you know, because he only understood it enough to defeat the Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics against the steadfast resistance of the Democrat Party whose mantra had become, “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em”).  If you search for “Even Ronald Reagan” you get another 33,800 results, with the first one being titled, “Even Ronald Reagan Agrees With Bernie Sanders.”  Oh yes, Ronnie would be a wild-eyed socialist today, wouldn’t he, you deluded liberals?

This actually isn’t about Reagan, although if any group of people on earth would refuse to allow a dead man to rest in peace, it would most assuredly be liberals.  This is about the current conservative view on policy issues and the left’s rhetorical game to take down those conservatives.

First of all, it’s kind of interesting for the left to play the “Even Reagan” game.  If you actually believe that what Reagan believed wasn’t right, why on earth would you ask someone to hold to the views of a guy you say is ignorant?  Isn’t that kind of crazy of you to do?  I mean, do you want to say “Even Hitler…” in a way intended to make one side hold more closely to Adolf Hitler’s policies?  It’s like virtually all other leftist talking points: it’s a word game.  It’s actually a pretty stupid one.

Let me explain what is so desperately wrong with this attack and why the left keeps advancing it by a parallel argument: “Even Jimmy Carter was opposed to abortion.”  As president, Jimmy Carter said, “I am convinced that every abortion is an unplanned tragedy, brought about by a combination of human errors and this has been one of the most difficult moral and political issues I have had to face. As president, I accepted my obligation to enforce the “Roe v. Wade” Supreme Court ruling, and at the same time attempted in every way possible to minimize the number of abortions.”  Hardly a triumphant shout of “women have the right to choose to kill as many of their babies as they want to and let the fathers of those babies rights be damned!” statement; it was a regretful, “This is wrong, but I have no choice” statement.  So even Jimmy Carter believed abortion was a “tragedy.”  And why shouldn’t you be flash-frozen to that view the way you want to flash-freeze me to Regan’s views?

Here’s another one: “Even President Jimmy Carter didn’t believe in same-sex marriage.”

Even Jimmy Carter didn’t believe in …” and you name it, you could certainly advance that thesis if you want to compare Carter’s stated views and policies to Obama’s.

But on the left’s incredibly disingenuous and profoundly hypocritical narrative, only Democrats have the right to have any evolution of their views.  Democrats have “evolved” a damn MILE, but let Republicans evolve an INCH and they are therefore on this incredibly hypocritical narrative without any question a bunch of extremists.

I mean, even REAGAN!

Let’s put aside the fact that EVEN JFK believed that reducing taxes caused increased opportunity and incentivized economic growth.  That is a FACT of history, and anyone who isn’t an idiot knows it.  But hell, Republicans are “extremists” for wanting a little more than what Reagan wanted, whereas Democrats are WHAT for doing a COMPLETE U-TURN AND WANTING SOMETHING FUNDAMENTALLY AND PROFOUNDLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THEIR GREATEST PRESIDENT WANTED????

Which party has actually wildly veered into extremism???  It sure couldn’t be the damn party that urinated on the entire history of the human civilization in imposing homosexual marriage, let alone their precious Darwinian evolution and it’s edict of “survival of the fittest” defined as “Survival of the form that will leave the most copies of itself in successive generations.”  Good luck fertilizing an egg by all the sodomy in the world, queers.  And if you’re a lesbian, keep licking furiously; but if you’ve got a functioning brain cell in your head, you ought to know naught will come from it beyond the hairballs you cough up.

One party not only utterly abandoned the history of civilization, not only abandoned the history of every major religion, but also abandoned the very pretense of science they claimed they held the mantle of.  But it’s not like they went “extremist” or anything.

I think we should “fundamentally transform” our calendars and start with BS: “Before Sodomy.”  Because one rabidly extremist political party wildly transformed the universe (in a shockingly depraved way).

If you’re a Democrat, you are at this point by definition a hypocrite to the last cell of your vile little cockroach brain, so there is absolutely NOTHING WRONG with MASSIVE SHIFTS in policy; if you are a Republican, however, any change is somehow defined as a “radical” and as an “extremist” shift toward some demagogic monster.

Since Democrats love the mantra “even Ronald Reagan…” let’s punch them in the mouth with a little bit of “Even Bill Clinton…”

Let’s look at what an actual QUESTION would have looked like had the one Democrat debate not been an example of the Democrat Party’s most powerful super PAC rather than legitimate journalism:

Mrs. Clinton, back in the 1990s your husband concluded the North American Free Trade Agreement, signed legislation repealing the Glass-Steagall restrictions on affiliations between banks and securities firms, and embraced welfare reform and cuts in capital gains taxes. In 1996, he famously declared “the era of big government is over.”

Today you are running on a pro-tax, pro-regulation, pro-spending platform that is almost the opposite of your husband’s economic record. If his policies worked so well in the 1990s, why are you running against them today?

I mean, EVEN BILL CLINTON…  not that Democrats give a flying damn about their wild swing into the most extremist policies imaginable even compared to their last Democrat president.

There is a constant, unwavering attempt by the mainstream media and the Democrat Party and in particular the most demagogic president in the entire history of the republic, Obama, to demonize and slander the Republican Party has having become “extremist.”  And their most darling argument to that bogus end is the “even Reagan” mantra.  Reagan was a great president.  But he was last president very nearly thirty years ago.

Ronald Reagan massively changed the social, political and economic landscape with policies that were fundamentally different from what had been done before.  He fought very hard for his core beliefs and was willing to do something that Barack Obama has proven to be pathologically incapable of doing: reaching out to the other side.  Reagan REGULARLY met with his Democrat Party opposites and worked out deals.  You tell me the number of times that Obama ever sought to meet with Republican leaders.  He was either arrogantly stating to them, “Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won” or neither he nor anyone on his damn STAFF even had the Republican leaders’ phone numbers to reach them.

How about this one, “Even Reagan” leftist lecturers: how about “EVEN OBAMA”

On the debt:

Obama: The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents – #43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic. — July 3, 2008

What’s the damn debt again, you demon-possessed HYPOCRITE???  It’s $18.5 trillion and skyrocketing by the nanosecond.  You’ve added NINE TRILLION by your lonesome and you aint even DONE yet!

Or how about this one:

“I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. For me, as a Christian, it’s also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.”

Oops.  So much for gay marriage.  “Even Obama!”  I mean, holy crap, what about THAT “even Obama” compared to your current precise opposite “even Obama”!!!???!!!???

How about this “even Hillary” from Hillary, who now is actually trying to claim that her installation of a secretive private server giving her sole control over her emails so that she could purge tens of thousands of them without ANYONE being allowed to examine them even after her secret server and all of her emails on it had been lawfully subpoenaed by Congress?   Consider what Hillary said about the Bush White House that did NOT use secretive private servers:

HILLARY CLINTON: You know our Constitution is being shredded. We know about the secret wiretaps, about the secret military tribunals, we know about the secret White House email accounts.

So Hillary Clinton needs to be thoroughly investigated and convicted for her shredding the Constitution.  EVEN HILLARY agrees.  At least when she’s not being an abject cockroach hypocrite.

We’re not talking about a party “evolving” over thirty years; we’re talking about a party that swung wildly and radically extremist in ONE CANCEROUS PRESIDENCY that now seeks to further infest and infect America with THE NEXT CANCEROUS PRESIDENCY.

Every single Democrat or “journalist” who has ever used any phrase containing the words “even” and “Reagan” is simply demon-possessed.  There is no other way to explain such massive hypocrisy and such massive dishonesty and such massive depravity.

Barack Obama has just as massively “fundamentally transformed” the political landscape by his tyrannical determination to either get his way exactly the way he wants it or do what he wants through executive order without bothering to deal with the inconveniences of the House and Senate or the Constitution.  And Reagan’s way of doing things won’t work with that level of fascist hate for everything our republic stands for that the Democrat Party has degenerated into since Reagan left office.

This was frankly proven even in Reagan’s own time.  Consider what the Associated Press tried to do to Republicans by invoking Reagan’s “amnesty” for illegal immigrants in a manner that attempted to frame them as hypocrites for opposing Obama’s amnesty.  It’s just another example of “even Reagan..”  Hey, let’s ignore some major differences, such as the fact that Reagan signed a bill into law that had been duly passed by the House and Senate; whereas Obama IMPOSED an amnesty that had been explicitly voted down by Congress by act of sheer executive tyranny.  AFTER having repeatedly stated that he didn’t have the authority to do what he did, that it would violate democracy, that he would be an emperor, etc.  HOW ABOUT THAT EXAMPLE OF “EVEN OBAMA…”???  Let’s also consider the fact that Reagan’s amnesty FAILED by all accounts – so why the hell do more of what already has been proven not to work???  And let’s also consider the flat-out LIAR that Democrats proved to be given a condition for Reagan’s signing that law in the first place:

Rising levels of illegal immigration [led to] the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA).  It provided amnesty for 3 million illegal immigrants, in return for increased border security and penalties for companies “knowingly” hiring illegal immigrants.

Democrats dishonestly proved to be liars who refused to make good on either one of those two conditions.  They proved that they are utterly illegitimate negotiating partners.  And they have been dishonest negotiating partners ever since.

Even Reagan can’t be “even Reagan” when he could literally trust the pathologically dishonest Soviet Union more than he could trust the Democrat Party.

Again, this is just another example of “even Reagan,” so if Republicans oppose Obama doing what he did, it’s only because they’re “extremist.”  Because you see, it’s only fascist when Republicans evolve, at least it is if you’ve got enough legions of demons screaming in your insane brain.

To hold one party to a standard that old even as your own party has swung wildly and massively to the left is quite literally clinically insane both in terms of schizophrenic (by believing “facts” that are blatantly false) and sociopathic (by manifesting profound deceit and insincerity and an appalling absence of remorse or shame).

I am so sick of these sneering pseudo-intellectual HYPOCRITES creating “facts” by the despicable manipulation of rhetoric otherwise known as “political correctness.”

We now live in a time when liberals are so hypocritical and frankly so blatantly morally depraved that liberals believe that it is okay for their members to label police as “murderers” and that “law enforcement” is tantamount to “white supremacy” but it is somehow intolerable for a Republican to talk about the ACTUAL MURDERERS and criminals who are flooding into our nation via illegal immigration.

Liberal Hollywood tycoon Quentin Tarantino appeared on liberal MSNBC and doubled-down after calling police murders.  He said (“whined” being a more accurate term):

That’s the way they attack me …  for standing up for the rights of unarmed citizens who have been killed by the police.

They want to demonize me.  They want to slander me and imply that I said things I didn’t say.  And the reason is because they want me to shut up and they want to make sure that no other people like me, prominent citizens, will stand up for that side.

First of all, you turd, WHY ARE THE CITIZENS UNARMED AGAIN???  Oh, that’s right; because of liberals like YOU dedicated to denying us our 2nd Amendment freedom in spite of the fact that basically every single movie you ever made glorified gun violence – because, yeah, to be a damn liberal is to be a damn hypocrite.  And second, what about the left trying to destroy Donald Trump for pointing out the fact that “unarmed citizens” are rather routinely getting MURDERED by illegal immigrants that this administration refuses to deal with?  What about the far MORE fascist tactics that the left routinely uses to demonize any debate???

You can’t reason with or argue with a hypocrite.  Democrats constantly shift in their double-standards.  As I believe I’ve amply demonstrated above, the goal posts move on every single play with them while they demonize us for not PERFECTLY holding to the ideals of a man from three decades ago.

It is literally Satanic for the Democrat Party that has swung further to extremism than any political party has in American history to label the Republican Party as “extremists.”  Just as it is literally Satanic for the mainstream media to act as that extremist party’s most powerful super PAC by backing their demagoguery.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 625 other followers