Archive for the ‘illegal immigration’ Category

Obama Let In 9,500 ‘Immigrants’ With Terrorist Ties, Revoked Their Visas After The Fact, And Now Has NO IDEA AT ALL Where They Are

December 18, 2015

Is this part of a plan?

Obama has “lost track” of 9,500 “immigrants” whose visas were revoked because they were identified as having ties to terrorism.

In what might be the WORST thing about this new revelation is that Tashfeen Malik – the murderous Islamic terrorist who came here on a visa and gunned down 35 people (murdering 14) – was not even ON that list of 9.500 potential terrorists.

We have under Obama and because of Obama completely lost any handle, any track, any sense of the exploding problem of Islamic terrorism (that Obama won’t even acknowledge is a problem).

Take a look at this and mourn for your country that has had I.E.D.s implanted into its bowels because of one wicked man and one wicked political party:

Terrific: Feds Have No Clue If 9500 People With Revoked Visas and Links to Terrorism Are in U.S.
Katie Pavlich | Dec 18, 2015

In case you missed it yesterday, the House Oversight Committee held a hearing about the vetting process for refugees entering the United States from terrorism hot spots.

During the hearing, officials from the State Department and Homeland Security were asked about the location of 9,500 individuals who have been stripped of their U.S. visas because of links to terrorism. They had no idea and could not say if these individuals were still in the U.S.

“The Department [State] has revoked approximately 122,000 visas for a variety of reasons including nearly 9500 with links to terrorism. Of the 122,000 revoked visas, how many of those people are still in the United States?” Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz asked Department of State Assistant Secretary Michele Bond. 

“I don’t know,” she responded.

“Homeland Security, how many revoked visas are still in the United States of America,” Chaffetz asked DHS Assistant Secretary for International Affairs Alan Bersin. 

“Mr. Chairman, I don’t have that,” he responded. 

According to a 2014 report from ABC News, the federal government has lost track of 6,000 foreign nationals who have overstayed their student visas. Keep in mind that this is the tactic the 9/11 hijackers used.

The Department of Homeland Security has lost track of more than 6,000 foreign nationals who entered the United States on student visas, overstayed their welcome, and essentially vanished — exploiting a security gap that was supposed to be fixed after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.

“My greatest concern is that they could be doing anything,” said Peter Edge, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement official who oversees investigations into visa violators. “Some of them could be here to do us harm.”

ABC News found that immigration officials have struggled to keep track of the rapidly increasing numbers of foreign students coming to the U.S. — now in excess of one million each year. The immigration agency’s own figures show that 58,000 students overstayed their visas in the past year. Of those, 6,000 were referred to agents for follow-up because they were determined to be of heightened concern.

In the meantime, the White House is moving forward with plans to bring in an absolute MINIMUM of 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States within the next two years.

We currently – and I mean RIGHT STINKING NOW – have more refugees fleeing a world that is collapsing than at any time in the documented history of the world:

Worldwide displacement hits all-time high as war and persecution increase
News Stories, 18 June 2015

GENEVA, June 18 (UNHCR) – Wars, conflict and persecution have forced more people than at any other time since records began to flee their homes and seek refuge and safety elsewhere, according to a new report from the UN refugee agency.

UNHCR’s annual Global Trends Report: World at War, released on Thursday (June 18), said that worldwide displacement was at the highest level ever recorded. […]

There wouldn’t have BEEN a refugee crisis unless Obama had created it.

And in the same way, terrorism and terrorist groups and terrorist attacks have EXPLODED under Obama BECAUSE of Obama.  [But please don’t tell liberals that terrorist murders quadrupled under Obama or else they’ll give him ANOTHER Nobel Peace Prize; these people are just that steeped in evil and deceit].

And therefore the massive way of Muslim “immigration” into America that Obama has not only facilitated but demanded has overwhelmed any means for anyone trying to protect America.  And I mean, SHOULDN’T OBAMA KNOW THIS?  SHOULDN’T HE CARE?  BUT HE DOESN’T CARE.  Because Obama has an ideology and a partisan agenda, and nothing else matters to him.

And currently – and I mean RIGHT STINKING NOW – Obama is incredibly saying that his plan is working wonderfully.  This is a man who is completely owned by Satan.

You cannot explain the mystery of lawlessness that is Obama without understanding that there is a personal Satan who owns Obama’s soul, owns the Democrat Party that is Obama’s machine, and therefore owns America.  Which USED to be “one nation under God” until the Democrat Party stripped God from the nation.

But let me get back to the 9,500 very-possible TERRORISTS who may very well be in our country RIGHT NOW because Obama just didn’t bother to look for them.

Do you understand that?  Nearly 10,000 terrorists are God-knows-where and quite likely working on their plots to murder in the name of Allah – and Obama’s response is to demand we let in ANOTHER 10,000 potential terrorists from a hostile and collapsed state where a) we can’t possibly vet anyone anyway even in the best of times and b) Islamic State has seized their own passport machine AND the blank official passport forms to manufacture “authentic Syrian passports.”

Add to that number the 6,000 that Obama allowed in who used the exact same trick as the 9/11 terrorists who brought down the twin towers of the World Trade Center and murdered 3,000 people.

Add to THAT number ANOTHER 122,000 CRIMINALS who are guilty of crimes as bad as rape and murder whom Obama just completely lost track of.

As to this immediate above, it’s not like conservatives weren’t frothing in rage about it FIVE DAMN YEARS AGO (as I documented):

New Obama ICE Plan Refuses To Deport Illegals Without ‘Serious’ Criminal Record

And therefore Obama’s INTENTIONAL RELEASE of 68,000 illegal immigrant CRIMINALS INCLUDING MURDERERS AND RAPISTS was a matter of inevitability (as I documented):

Obama Released 68,000 Convicted Criminal Illegal Immigrants Last Year (To Attack/Udermine Americans AGAIN)

Barack Obama is a man who truly, passionately hates and despises America.  He doesn’t give one flying DAMN about you or your family.  In fact, he HOPES you suffer because he believes he can radicalize you to his ends; he HOPES you are murdered by terrorists because he can exploit your murder and incite the fools he radicalizes to further his ends.  You are nothing more than an insignificant means to his pathologically demonic ends.

He has already revealed his cynical plan to use every new terrorist attack as his political mechanism to attack the American people and attack their Constitution and obliterate their 2nd Amendment rights.

There is no possible way NOT to include that Obama and Democrats aren’t doing this on purpose.  Incompetence doesn’t even BEGIN to explain this.

Does Obama even BEGIN to care about the American people?  Did he EVER care?  The answer is not a care in hell.

Obama just responded to the San Bernardino terrorist massacre by freeing a bunch of terrorists from Gitmo.  He just did it again, freeing more terrorists than at any time in his entire cancerous presidency.  But get this as described by former Attorney General Judge Michael Mukasey:

And from day – wasn’t day one, it was actually day two when he started signing orders closing Gitmo, eliminating the CIA interrogation program that it was obvious he was going to do this. And he proceeded along that road. If you take a look, there is an interesting YouTube video him signing executive orders on the second day of his administration. Where he signs an executive order to close Gitmo, takes a look at it, he says do we have another order that says what were going to do with these people? And so voice off camera says we’re going to have procedures.

No, they didn’t have any plan for what to do with the terrorists they were freeing.  But so what?  They didn’t CARE.  Obama let them go anyway.  They STILL don’t have a damn plan and they STILL don’t care.  It is a damn miserable fact that one in three of the “Gitmo detainees” have been DOCUMENTED to have returned to terrorism (keep in mind what I’ve shown the U.S. government CAN’T keep track of, right?).  And they don’t care.

Obama is in the genre and model and mode of Adolf Hitler who first exploited the Reichstag fire to suspend the rights of German citizens and then exploited the Gleiwitz incident to take his next step into dictatorship.  Obama has a proven “never let a good crisis go to waste” mentality: I submit that, given the above facts that Obama has clearly perpetrated on the American people, it is beyond entirely reasonable to believe that Obama plans to cynically exploit the terror attacks he has invited on America as his “justification” to suspend the 2016 election if it looks like a Republican could win in addition to seizing our guns that we would need to defend ourselves against his fascist tyranny.

Obama has literally INTENTIONALLY flooded America with terrorists so he can blame their terrorism – whose actual source of Islam he demonically refuses to acknowledge – on guns.  It doesn’t matter to him that the attack in San Bernardino took place in a liberal state with the tightest gun laws in the country; it doesn’t matter that the immediate prior mass terror attack in France took place in a COUNTRY with some of the tightest gun laws in the WORLD.  Just as it doesn’t matter to him that he is a truly wicked man for allowing all of these murderers into America to attack us.

He’s giving us another useless blathering speech today and then he’s off to Hawaii for another vacation.

Like I said, Tashfeen Malik, the terrorist monster, was NOT one of these 9,500 potential terrorists.  Because Obama completely missed her in every imaginable way.  She was entirely free to commit jihad murder.  Obama not only didn’t do anything to stop her; he invited her in even after it should have been obvious that she was plotting jihadist mayhem.

The beast is coming.  And very soon every single mass-murdering baby-slaughtering homosexual-sodomy-perversion worshiping Democrat will worship him and take his mark on their right hands or on their foreheads.

 

Advertisements

Liberals: Obama Massively FAILED To Protect America From Terrorism; So Let Him Take Away Our Guns So We Can Be MORE Defenseless

December 7, 2015

The New York Times is morally outraged.

You know, much the way child-molesters probably get morally outraged from time to time.  Which is to say, SHUT THE HELL UP.

The New York Times editorial I’m reacting to is based on two hidden underlying premises: 1) that good people should be rendered helpless; and 2) that evil people obey laws.  Both premises are cockroach crap.

A third underlying premise to all liberal appeals for more gun control is this: that, like the caliphate, every new piece of ground we take, every new piece of legislation, is one more step toward total control.  Democrats want to “control the people“; they’ve ALWAYS wanted to control the people.  Just like the terrorists and their dreams of political caliphate who want to be able to forcibly impose their will on helpless people who would be stripped of any means to resist their tyranny.  Democrats therefore want nothing less than the total confiscation of guns in America – and I’m absolutely certain that every terrorist says “praise Allah!” to that happy thought.  And when you can know that there is a group of people who are committed to taking away your rights, the ONLY “right” thing to do is to fight them over every single inch of ground.  Every single NANOMETER.

A fourth underlying premise is that the left desperately needs to get behind Obama’s incredibly cynical attempt to try to divert and distract attention away from his impeachable failure to protect America by demagoguing a highly partisan liberal policy posture.  It basically comes down to, “Obama failed to protect America when Republicans were warning about his building failure for YEARS, but let’s just conveniently put that fact aside and just give him more of what he wants.”  Because if you can’t reward liberalism and liberals for failure, how in the world can they ever expect to be rewarded given the fact that fail is all they do?

What we saw on Wednesday was a supermassive policy failure on the part of a Democrat President who has failed to protect America from terrorism at every imaginable turn.  And what the New York Times in it’s front page op-ed scream is treasonously declaring is that Barack Obama ought to be REWARDED for his supermassive failure to protect the American people by giving him the uberleftist Nazi gun-control victory that his fellow fascists have been seeking for decades.  It’s like Rahm Emmanuel said: every crisis is an opportunity.  And therefore when Obama creates a crisis by his incompetence and his moral idiocy, it ought to be an opportunity for Obama to reward his failure by seizing the freedoms of his enemies who happen to love the Constitution he routinely urinates on with the frequency of an aging man with a watermelon-sized prostate.

As I pointed out in a recent previous article, the terrorists launched a massively deadly attack in Paris France – which has some of the strictest gun controls ON EARTH.  Gun control works GREAT in theory; if nobody has guns, then nobody can commit any violence with guns, right?  It just fails in actual reality because for some reason Democrats can’t fathom, criminals and terrorists don’t bother to follow their laws.  Only ordinary people follow the laws who are then rendered helpless – which of course emboldens the criminals and terrorists.  Consider also that poor Marine who got confused and unintentionally entered Mexico with a couple of guns and spent months rotting in prison; there’s ANOTHER country with strict gun control laws.  Which means only the murderous CARTELS have guns and the people are utterly helpless before them.  Gun control works out GREAT for the people who have the guns who get to terrorize and murder helpless, defenseless people.

Then consider that Obama has REFUSED to keep our southern borders safe, and imagine where the guns will come flooding in from when only criminals and terrorists will break the law to get them.

Gun control works for fascist governments that want to “control the people.”  And it works for criminals and terrorists.  It fails and ultimately murders everybody else.

Obama has failed America so badly it is beyond UNREAL: terrorist attacks skyrocketed 150% in the five years of his failed presidency leading up to 2014 and we aint seen NOTHIN’ yet as they surged ANOTHER 81% this year from last.  Next year you will see hell unleashed because of this fool president and his fool liberal policies that the New York Slimes endorses and re-endorses.

The only announcement that ought to come from Obama is the announcement that he is RESIGNING.

This lying fool Obama boasted that Islamic State was merely “JayVee” when they were already seizing city after city in Iraq. He’s flat-out lied to us from the start about these vicious murderers.  Just a few hours before the vicious murderous terror attack in Paris, Obama lied again and assured America that Islamic State was “contained” when they were very obviously anything BUT.  The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff basically told the American people that their commander-in-chief LIED to them in claiming Islamic State was contained.  He refuted Obama.  But Obama doesn’t give a flying DAMN what the actual intelligence is.  He’s been ordering his handpicked bureaucrat thugs to overrule the actual intelligence analysts and just impose Obama’s political narrative in place of the actual intelligence.  And so just days before the vicious terror attack in San Bernardino, Obama was yet again falsely and deceitfully assuring the American people that he was keeping us safe.  How safe should you feel about his worthless reassurances now?

Obama sent out Hilary Clinton and Susan Rice to REPEATEDLY lie about the TERRORIST ATTACK that resulted in the murder of American heroes and the first US Ambassador since 1979 to be killed like a dog.  We now KNOW from Hillary Clinton’s emails that she tried to destroy that the Obama administration KNEW that the attack was a terrorist attack and NOT the result of some stupid video.  But the 1st Amendment right to free speech is just ANOTHER basic American freedom that Obama and Clinton tried to destroy the way they’re trying to destroy our 2nd Amendment rights.

Last night, amazingly, Democrats are actually giving Obama credit for acknowledging that the Ft. Hood shooting was a terrorist attack.  Do you know what a sick JOKE that is?  When did that attack happen?  Nov 5, 2009.  Do you know how long it took ME to officially call that attack what it clearly was?  I wrote this article November 6 the very next DAY.  Let’s see, what did I already know that day?  Let’s see: we already knew about his numerous internet postings espousing jihad.  We already knew he got into loud arguments with co-workers declaring that “Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor.”  That’s you, by the way, if you happen to be an American.  We know that he was screaming “Allahu Akbar” throughout his murderous attack.  Again, that very SAME DAY on November 6 I wrote this article titled, “Newsflash: Obama Enlisted Future Terrorist To Label Rightwing As ‘Extremist’” because Obama had actually ENLISTED Nidal Hasan to demonize conservatives and write propaganda that it was conservatives who were the real threat, not radical Muslims.  It was within a matter of days that the authorities revealed that Hasan had business cards calling himself a “soldier of Allah” and had had numerous internet contacts with terrorist leader Anwar al-Awlaki.

Obama finally officially acknowledged Nidal Hasan was a terrorist last night?

It took Obama MORE THAN SIX YEARS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE OBVIOUS.

Let me put it this way: today is December 7th.  You know NOTHING about history if you don’t know what anniversary that is, the savage Japanese attack against Pearl Harbor.  What if it had taken FDR SIX YEARS to acknowledge that we had been attacked by a foreign ideology and that we needed to go to war against that ideology.  And I’ll tell you what would have happened: the eastern half of American would be speaking Nazi and the Western half would be speaking Banzai, that’s what would have happened.

For SIX YEARS Obama buried his head in the damn sand and refused to acknowledge we had a rising enemy.  He STILL refuses to acknowledge that that enemy is motivated by ISLAMIC THEOLOGY.

We are sitting ducks because he did NOTHING.

Now, I just got through mentioning that just a matter of a few damn days before the terrorist attack that was eerily similar to Paris, Obama said nothing like that could happen here.  Because he’s a deluded FOOL.  But hey, for that matter the same hoity-toity New York Times assured us that what happened in Paris can’t happen here.  Just days before it DID happen here to prove that those know-nothing fools are a bunch of know-nothing FOOLS.

How many times do these fools get to be completely WRONG?  How many times do they get to LIE to us?

Here’s another thing to point out what a massive FAIL Obama and his Democrat roaches are when it comes to keeping Americans safe: This terrorist attack is just another in a long, LONG string of mass shootings that were committed because of the wickedness of Democrats who want to render Americans helpless with their cursed “gun free zones.” And they want to make the entire NATION one giant gun-free zone.

Now, I don’t doubt thanks to our Failed Fool in Chief that there WILL come a point when terrorists are so emboldened that they go after our police and our military by launching direct attacks on police stations and military installations.  But up to this point, how many times have terrorists decided they wanted to go after a target where heavily armed people had an opportunity to defend themselves and shoot back?  Fool Democrats merely want to increase the number of potential terrorist targets from thousands of “gun-free zones” to HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS.

Democrats often talk about “hunting” and say you don’t need an “assault rifle” to hunt.  Of course, based on that “logic,” it won’t be long before they’ve regulated Americans to the point where the only gun they can use is a damned BLUNDERBUSS.  But here’s the thing, that’s a deceitful bait and switch and anybody who knows history knows it’s a bait and switch: the 2nd Amendment doesn’t guarantee the “right to hunt”; it never mentions “hunting” at ALL.  Rather, the 2nd Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear ARMS” and declares that that right “shall not be infringed.”

Where the hell did Democrats decide that when the first grocery store or the first McDonald’s came to exist, that somehow the 2nd Amendment didn’t apply anymore because we no longer needed to hunt to live?

All an “assault weapon” is just a clever marketing ploy to make the semi-automatic rifles that have been legal in America since semi-automatic rifles were INVENTED.  “Assault rifles” are defined as weapons capable of selective fire, either semi- or full-automatic.  “Assault weapons” are merely semi-automatic weapons that look really cool.  They are designed to look all scary and nasty, but they’re just basic semi-automatic rifles.  In fact, if you actually know your history, you’ll know that semi-automatic rifles were actually in the hands of civilians BEFORE the first semi-automatic rifles (the M-1 Garand) were issued to US servicemen.  American civilians were using semi-automatic rifles at least going back to 1906, a full thirty years before the military got them.  So the notion that the American people shouldn’t be allowed to have these guns is just plain BULL CRAP.  It is anti-American.

Actually, assault weapons are AWESOME weapons to hunt with.  They are awesome ALL-AROUND weapons in that they are great for target shooting, for hunting AND for defense.  When I go on my hikes, I see people shooting with them ALL THE TIME.  And yet because I’m not a coward liberal I never scream and run because oh-my-god that weapon is going to take over the mind of its owner and kill me!

The 2nd Amendment exists for one reason: so the government won’t EVER have the power or ability to hunt US the way the gun-confiscating Nazis hunted down the Jews.

The 2nd Amendment was enshrined by our founding fathers as A REACTION AGAINST TYRANNY.  And the tyranny that they were MOST worried about was the tyranny of our OWN government.  And they enshrined the 2nd Amendment to guarantee that at some safeguarding level, the government would be forced to fear the people so that the people would not have to live in fear of their government.  You know, the way they had to fear their damn government in so many places that enacted the sort of “gun control” the left wants, such as Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia.

I’m going to declare it this way: unless and until the Democrat Party officially and permanently declares that the 2nd Amendment is in fact a fundamental right for the people to keep and to bear arms and ANY attempt to infringe on that right is a federal crime subject to HEAVY prison time for ANY politician, judge, or voter who tries to usurp that right, I for one am not going to listen to their mewling about gun control.

As long as there is an Obama stenching up the White House with the moral sewer of his power-grabbing executive orders, I want what my founding fathers intended me to have to protect my life and my property from his evil.

Their hypocritical money quote is this: “No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.”

Except the right for illegal immigrants and criminals to vote without any damn ID check, of course.  The New York Times will fight to its last Nazi to stop that from ever happening.

Illegal immigrants are VOTING. YES THEY ARE!!!  Obama’s illegal – even illegal according to his own “Justice” Department just hours before he dictated what HE HIMSELF said he had absolutely no right to do executive actions have taken away the very few protection and enforcement measures America had to keep its elections safe from foreign manipulation.  And it is now beyond easy to document as a matter-of-fact that Democrats have been AGITATING and working toward the “right” of all illegal immigrants to vote IN RABID DEFIANCE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.

But ANY attempt to require ANY ID is met with rabid opposition and outright demonic slander.  You know, from the party that says Republicans aren’t “reasonable.”

And just for the record, if Democrats have any right whatsoever to ban the American people from owning guns because of what a FEW people do, then at least they ought to be “reasonable” enough to deport every single illegal immigrant in this nation because of what a few ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS do.  So you ban your guns and we’ll deport forty million undocumented immigrants.  And if the latter one is insane, the former one is even MORE insane because the former one is enshrined in our Constitution and our way of life.

Now let me talk more about “voting” and the UNLIMITED and IMMUNE FROM REASONABLE REGULATION “right to vote” that the Democrat Party has enshrined without ANY constitutional support.

The Nazis were ELECTED, chump.  Just like the terrorist organization Hamas was elected in the Palestinian territory.  Just like the terrorist organization the Muslim Brotherhood was elected in Egypt.  Just like the damn Democrat Party was elected in America.

Voting is THE most dangerous right on earth.  I’ll just put it this way: a whole hell of a lot more Jews were killed in Nazi concentration camps than all the Americans who exercised their 2nd Amendment rights throughout the entire history of the world’s oldest republic COMBINED.

But the same Democrats who demand our borders remain flooded with millions of illegal immigrants – and of course illegal guns coming in with them the exact same damn way they’re serving as mules for drug cartels now – won’t allow ANY “reasonable regulation” when it comes to their “unlimited” right from illegal immigrants to be “immune” from consequences of voting in US elections.

I’ll tell you what: the right to keep and bear arms isn’t merely a “right”; it’s a constitutional guarantee and it is a fundamental basis for ALL of our freedoms.  Because your freedom doesn’t mean a damn thing if somebody else wants to take your freedom away and they’ve got guns and you’ve got squat.  Versus the Democrat’s cynical and self-serving partisan demand for a “right” that is UNCONSTITIONAL and frankly ANTICONSTITUTIONAL in giving illegal immigrants the ability to override the will of the American people.

It comes down to this: as we speak, the President of the United States and his entire Democrat Party establishment are playing the most cynical and partisan political games in the entire history of the republic.  And if they win, the United States of America loses.

If you’ve got a gun, you better keep your powder dry, because Obama and his Democrat National Socialist Workers Party fascist thugs are DESPERATE to change the subject and they want your guns now more than EVER.

If Democrats don’t want to have guns, I’m all in favor of them not having them.  I am all in favor of any law that criminalizes anyone who has ever voted Democrat from owning guns.  If Democrats truly think gun control is such a wonderful idea, let them vote to take away their own damn guns and see what happens.

The worst problem with Democrats is that they invariably want to impose their fascism on everybody else.

The Demonic Hypocrisy Of Democrats Who Invoke Reagan With The Words, “Why, Even Ronald Reagan [Fill In The Blank].”

November 5, 2015

I don’t know how many times I’ve heard “even Reagan” attacks on Republicans from liberals such as, “Even Reagan raised taxes,” or “Even Reagan granted amnesty to illegal immigrants.”

I mean, Reagan cut the damn taxes, okay?  Can we please stop the bullcrap?  The top rate went from 70% to 28% under the Reagan tax cut which ignited the economy like nothing ever has before or since.  You’ve got to be not only a fool but a DAMNFOOL – which unfortunately is a synonym for “Democrat” – to try to argue that Reagan “raised taxes.”  If some taxes went up, while most taxes went down and the overall tax rate went WAY down, it’s pretty pathetic to cling to the couple of times that Reagan raised some minor tax to try to argue against the FACT that Reagan cut taxes.  And yet the left does it all the time.

I googled the phrase (with quotes) “even Reagan” and got 27,700 hits, including the first one from the New York Slimes titled, “ObamaCare and Reagan.”  The author’s thesis is apparently that Reagan was a confused man who didn’t understand socialism (you know, because he only understood it enough to defeat the Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics against the steadfast resistance of the Democrat Party whose mantra had become, “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em”).  If you search for “Even Ronald Reagan” you get another 33,800 results, with the first one being titled, “Even Ronald Reagan Agrees With Bernie Sanders.”  Oh yes, Ronnie would be a wild-eyed socialist today, wouldn’t he, you deluded liberals?

This actually isn’t about Reagan, although if any group of people on earth would refuse to allow a dead man to rest in peace, it would most assuredly be liberals.  This is about the current conservative view on policy issues and the left’s rhetorical game to take down those conservatives.

First of all, it’s kind of interesting for the left to play the “Even Reagan” game.  If you actually believe that what Reagan believed wasn’t right, why on earth would you ask someone to hold to the views of a guy you say is ignorant?  Isn’t that kind of crazy of you to do?  I mean, do you want to say “Even Hitler…” in a way intended to make one side hold more closely to Adolf Hitler’s policies?  It’s like virtually all other leftist talking points: it’s a word game.  It’s actually a pretty stupid one.

Let me explain what is so desperately wrong with this attack and why the left keeps advancing it by a parallel argument: “Even Jimmy Carter was opposed to abortion.”  As president, Jimmy Carter said, “I am convinced that every abortion is an unplanned tragedy, brought about by a combination of human errors and this has been one of the most difficult moral and political issues I have had to face. As president, I accepted my obligation to enforce the “Roe v. Wade” Supreme Court ruling, and at the same time attempted in every way possible to minimize the number of abortions.”  Hardly a triumphant shout of “women have the right to choose to kill as many of their babies as they want to and let the fathers of those babies rights be damned!” statement; it was a regretful, “This is wrong, but I have no choice” statement.  So even Jimmy Carter believed abortion was a “tragedy.”  And why shouldn’t you be flash-frozen to that view the way you want to flash-freeze me to Regan’s views?

Here’s another one: “Even President Jimmy Carter didn’t believe in same-sex marriage.”

Even Jimmy Carter didn’t believe in …” and you name it, you could certainly advance that thesis if you want to compare Carter’s stated views and policies to Obama’s.

But on the left’s incredibly disingenuous and profoundly hypocritical narrative, only Democrats have the right to have any evolution of their views.  Democrats have “evolved” a damn MILE, but let Republicans evolve an INCH and they are therefore on this incredibly hypocritical narrative without any question a bunch of extremists.

I mean, even REAGAN!

Let’s put aside the fact that EVEN JFK believed that reducing taxes caused increased opportunity and incentivized economic growth.  That is a FACT of history, and anyone who isn’t an idiot knows it.  But hell, Republicans are “extremists” for wanting a little more than what Reagan wanted, whereas Democrats are WHAT for doing a COMPLETE U-TURN AND WANTING SOMETHING FUNDAMENTALLY AND PROFOUNDLY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THEIR GREATEST PRESIDENT WANTED????

Which party has actually wildly veered into extremism???  It sure couldn’t be the damn party that urinated on the entire history of the human civilization in imposing homosexual marriage, let alone their precious Darwinian evolution and it’s edict of “survival of the fittest” defined as “Survival of the form that will leave the most copies of itself in successive generations.”  Good luck fertilizing an egg by all the sodomy in the world, queers.  And if you’re a lesbian, keep licking furiously; but if you’ve got a functioning brain cell in your head, you ought to know naught will come from it beyond the hairballs you cough up.

One party not only utterly abandoned the history of civilization, not only abandoned the history of every major religion, but also abandoned the very pretense of science they claimed they held the mantle of.  But it’s not like they went “extremist” or anything.

I think we should “fundamentally transform” our calendars and start with BS: “Before Sodomy.”  Because one rabidly extremist political party wildly transformed the universe (in a shockingly depraved way).

If you’re a Democrat, you are at this point by definition a hypocrite to the last cell of your vile little cockroach brain, so there is absolutely NOTHING WRONG with MASSIVE SHIFTS in policy; if you are a Republican, however, any change is somehow defined as a “radical” and as an “extremist” shift toward some demagogic monster.

Since Democrats love the mantra “even Ronald Reagan…” let’s punch them in the mouth with a little bit of “Even Bill Clinton…”

Let’s look at what an actual QUESTION would have looked like had the one Democrat debate not been an example of the Democrat Party’s most powerful super PAC rather than legitimate journalism:

Mrs. Clinton, back in the 1990s your husband concluded the North American Free Trade Agreement, signed legislation repealing the Glass-Steagall restrictions on affiliations between banks and securities firms, and embraced welfare reform and cuts in capital gains taxes. In 1996, he famously declared “the era of big government is over.”

Today you are running on a pro-tax, pro-regulation, pro-spending platform that is almost the opposite of your husband’s economic record. If his policies worked so well in the 1990s, why are you running against them today?

I mean, EVEN BILL CLINTON…  not that Democrats give a flying damn about their wild swing into the most extremist policies imaginable even compared to their last Democrat president.

There is a constant, unwavering attempt by the mainstream media and the Democrat Party and in particular the most demagogic president in the entire history of the republic, Obama, to demonize and slander the Republican Party has having become “extremist.”  And their most darling argument to that bogus end is the “even Reagan” mantra.  Reagan was a great president.  But he was last president very nearly thirty years ago.

Ronald Reagan massively changed the social, political and economic landscape with policies that were fundamentally different from what had been done before.  He fought very hard for his core beliefs and was willing to do something that Barack Obama has proven to be pathologically incapable of doing: reaching out to the other side.  Reagan REGULARLY met with his Democrat Party opposites and worked out deals.  You tell me the number of times that Obama ever sought to meet with Republican leaders.  He was either arrogantly stating to them, “Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won” or neither he nor anyone on his damn STAFF even had the Republican leaders’ phone numbers to reach them.

How about this one, “Even Reagan” leftist lecturers: how about “EVEN OBAMA”

On the debt:

Obama: The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents – #43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic. — July 3, 2008

What’s the damn debt again, you demon-possessed HYPOCRITE???  It’s $18.5 trillion and skyrocketing by the nanosecond.  You’ve added NINE TRILLION by your lonesome and you aint even DONE yet!

Or how about this one:

“I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. For me, as a Christian, it’s also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.”

Oops.  So much for gay marriage.  “Even Obama!”  I mean, holy crap, what about THAT “even Obama” compared to your current precise opposite “even Obama”!!!???!!!???

How about this “even Hillary” from Hillary, who now is actually trying to claim that her installation of a secretive private server giving her sole control over her emails so that she could purge tens of thousands of them without ANYONE being allowed to examine them even after her secret server and all of her emails on it had been lawfully subpoenaed by Congress?   Consider what Hillary said about the Bush White House that did NOT use secretive private servers:

HILLARY CLINTON: You know our Constitution is being shredded. We know about the secret wiretaps, about the secret military tribunals, we know about the secret White House email accounts.

So Hillary Clinton needs to be thoroughly investigated and convicted for her shredding the Constitution.  EVEN HILLARY agrees.  At least when she’s not being an abject cockroach hypocrite.

We’re not talking about a party “evolving” over thirty years; we’re talking about a party that swung wildly and radically extremist in ONE CANCEROUS PRESIDENCY that now seeks to further infest and infect America with THE NEXT CANCEROUS PRESIDENCY.

Every single Democrat or “journalist” who has ever used any phrase containing the words “even” and “Reagan” is simply demon-possessed.  There is no other way to explain such massive hypocrisy and such massive dishonesty and such massive depravity.

Barack Obama has just as massively “fundamentally transformed” the political landscape by his tyrannical determination to either get his way exactly the way he wants it or do what he wants through executive order without bothering to deal with the inconveniences of the House and Senate or the Constitution.  And Reagan’s way of doing things won’t work with that level of fascist hate for everything our republic stands for that the Democrat Party has degenerated into since Reagan left office.

This was frankly proven even in Reagan’s own time.  Consider what the Associated Press tried to do to Republicans by invoking Reagan’s “amnesty” for illegal immigrants in a manner that attempted to frame them as hypocrites for opposing Obama’s amnesty.  It’s just another example of “even Reagan..”  Hey, let’s ignore some major differences, such as the fact that Reagan signed a bill into law that had been duly passed by the House and Senate; whereas Obama IMPOSED an amnesty that had been explicitly voted down by Congress by act of sheer executive tyranny.  AFTER having repeatedly stated that he didn’t have the authority to do what he did, that it would violate democracy, that he would be an emperor, etc.  HOW ABOUT THAT EXAMPLE OF “EVEN OBAMA…”???  Let’s also consider the fact that Reagan’s amnesty FAILED by all accounts – so why the hell do more of what already has been proven not to work???  And let’s also consider the flat-out LIAR that Democrats proved to be given a condition for Reagan’s signing that law in the first place:

Rising levels of illegal immigration [led to] the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA).  It provided amnesty for 3 million illegal immigrants, in return for increased border security and penalties for companies “knowingly” hiring illegal immigrants.

Democrats dishonestly proved to be liars who refused to make good on either one of those two conditions.  They proved that they are utterly illegitimate negotiating partners.  And they have been dishonest negotiating partners ever since.

Even Reagan can’t be “even Reagan” when he could literally trust the pathologically dishonest Soviet Union more than he could trust the Democrat Party.

Again, this is just another example of “even Reagan,” so if Republicans oppose Obama doing what he did, it’s only because they’re “extremist.”  Because you see, it’s only fascist when Republicans evolve, at least it is if you’ve got enough legions of demons screaming in your insane brain.

To hold one party to a standard that old even as your own party has swung wildly and massively to the left is quite literally clinically insane both in terms of schizophrenic (by believing “facts” that are blatantly false) and sociopathic (by manifesting profound deceit and insincerity and an appalling absence of remorse or shame).

I am so sick of these sneering pseudo-intellectual HYPOCRITES creating “facts” by the despicable manipulation of rhetoric otherwise known as “political correctness.”

We now live in a time when liberals are so hypocritical and frankly so blatantly morally depraved that liberals believe that it is okay for their members to label police as “murderers” and that “law enforcement” is tantamount to “white supremacy” but it is somehow intolerable for a Republican to talk about the ACTUAL MURDERERS and criminals who are flooding into our nation via illegal immigration.

Liberal Hollywood tycoon Quentin Tarantino appeared on liberal MSNBC and doubled-down after calling police murders.  He said (“whined” being a more accurate term):

That’s the way they attack me …  for standing up for the rights of unarmed citizens who have been killed by the police.

They want to demonize me.  They want to slander me and imply that I said things I didn’t say.  And the reason is because they want me to shut up and they want to make sure that no other people like me, prominent citizens, will stand up for that side.

First of all, you turd, WHY ARE THE CITIZENS UNARMED AGAIN???  Oh, that’s right; because of liberals like YOU dedicated to denying us our 2nd Amendment freedom in spite of the fact that basically every single movie you ever made glorified gun violence – because, yeah, to be a damn liberal is to be a damn hypocrite.  And second, what about the left trying to destroy Donald Trump for pointing out the fact that “unarmed citizens” are rather routinely getting MURDERED by illegal immigrants that this administration refuses to deal with?  What about the far MORE fascist tactics that the left routinely uses to demonize any debate???

You can’t reason with or argue with a hypocrite.  Democrats constantly shift in their double-standards.  As I believe I’ve amply demonstrated above, the goal posts move on every single play with them while they demonize us for not PERFECTLY holding to the ideals of a man from three decades ago.

It is literally Satanic for the Democrat Party that has swung further to extremism than any political party has in American history to label the Republican Party as “extremists.”  Just as it is literally Satanic for the mainstream media to act as that extremist party’s most powerful super PAC by backing their demagoguery.

Democrats Ask Why Hasn’t KY Clerk Been Fired In Gay Marriage License Case? SAME REASON YOUR OBAMA HASN’T BEEN FIRED.

September 2, 2015

Democrats and liberals – otherwise known as “pathological rabid hypocrites” – are demanding to know why the Kentucky clerk who is refusing to sign gay marriage certificates hasn’t been fired.

The same damn reason your false messiah hasn’t been fired, you moral cockroaches.

Democrats say “If Kim Davis doesn’t want to certify same-sex marriages, she should quit her job.”  They say the law is on their side.

So where the hell were you moral roach hypocrites when the “law” very clearly stated that marriage was between ONE man AND ONE woman and Barack Hussein Obama refused to honor a law that had been passed by both the House and the Senate and signed INTO LAW by President William Jefferson Clinton???

We see that the “ACLU wants Kentucky clerk in contempt of court over denying gay marriage licenses.”  So I suppose what that means is that it is an act of “contempt” not to follow the law.

So where WERE you holier-than-thou Pharisees when you were cheering wildly as Barack Hussein Obama should have been held in contempt, impeached and forcibly removed from office from blatantly violating the law of the land that you are now so upset is being violated???

We can go back more than four years to see Obama:

Obama administration will no longer defend DOMA

You had the law of the land, you had somebody refusing to follow the law of the land.

Obama issued one of his Führer’s Directives and the same people who are now purple apoplectic with rage cheered wildly.  Because you lawless Nazi thug-punks were drunk with the power of being able to ignore any damn law you didn’t like and flat-out making your OWN laws when the actual laws of the land demanded or imposed something you didn’t like.

Politico described Obama’s policy.  Here it is:

Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws

And of course, Obama has played this lawless game over and over again.  For example, our Roach-in-Chief publicly stated at least TWENTY-TWO TIMES that he would be a lawless, unconstitutional, anti-democratic fascist thug EMPEROR to impose “laws” by executive order on illegal immigration.  And then did the very thing he said he legally was banned from doing.

I think of the sanctuary cities whose very intent is to fly in the FACE of federal laws on the books.  I think of Obama demonically refusing to do a damn thing to protect the border states against illegal immigration, and then suing them when they tried to enact their own laws arguing that laws pertaining to immigration status or borders are solely under federal jurisdiction.  Unless, of course, that is, unless Democrats do the opposite version of the same damn thing Obama went on the warpath to prevent Republican states from doing.

But of course it’s different when Obama flagrantly ignores the law, dontchaknow.  Being a lawless political fascist thug is a GOOD thing when Obama does it.

So fine.  In Kentucky a clerk has the SAME DAMN STRATEGY and all of a sudden it is this horrible thing and she needs to lose her job and be held in contempt and have her fingernails torn from her clutching hands while she screams in pain.

And all she’s doing is following YOUR policy strategy, Democrat.

In the Los Angeles Times editorial, the Times stated the following that I at least appreciate for the sake of candid acknowledgment:

Where ‘God’s authority’ ends

For Democrats, there is no real point where God’s authority should BEGIN, and it should as sure as they will burn in hell for eternity be ENDED immediately and at every point where it in any way, shape or form intersects with their wickedness.

The Times admits that:

Historically this country has been generous toward individuals whose religious beliefs make it difficult for them to comply with the law.

And then immediately counters with a “but”:

But the accommodation must stop at the point at which a public official refuses to discharge her legal duty by invoking “God’s authority,” as Davis has done.

The God of the Bible’s authority should END, they tell us; what should NOT end and what should not even be interfered with is the authority of THEIR god, the omnipotent human state, as it grows more and more and more powerful.

Unless, of course, someone other than one of THEIR high-priests-of-Satan are at the helm of that government.

Shouldn’t the same smarmy-pharisaical Lost Angeles Slimes editorial board have also said:

But the accommodation must stop at the point at which a public official refuses to discharge his legal duty by invoking his OWN “God authority,” as Obama has done.

Pathologically dishonest, hypocrite Democrats keep playing the “God game” where they invoke religion or God or even the Bible to pervert these when they can twist them into supporting their ideology.  Oh, yes, you pathologically dishonest hypocrite lying liberal Democrat:

Obama invokes Jesus more than Bush
By  Eamon Javers
06/09/09, 04:09 AM EDT
Updated 06/09/09, 03:12 PM EDT

He’s done it while talking about abortion and the Middle East, even the economy. The references serve at once as an affirmation of his faith and a rebuke against a rumor that persists for some to this day.

As president, Barack Obama has mentioned Jesus Christ in a number of high-profile public speeches — something his predecessor George W. Bush rarely did in such settings, even though Bush’s Christian faith was at the core of his political identity. […]

What is always fascist and wrong for thee is always right and good for me, Democrats believe as a matter of their religion of fascist emperor worship.

You listen to twisted liars like Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton and you’d think that Jesus was a fervent socialist when JESUS NEVER SAID A SINGLE WORD AFFIRMING THE EXPANSION OF HUMAN GOVERNMENT.  And when in fact it was human government that violated its own “laws” to put Jesus to death.  Just like Jesus was NOT a homosexual and Jesus HATES abortion murder.  And then these same Democrats ban religion from intruding into their unholy human government all the other times because all of the above flat-out refute everything-the-hell-they’re-doing and every-reason-the-hell-why-they’re-doing it.  Religion is a tool that demonic Democrats cynically exploit to impose their godless way even as they scream out against any who would legitimately follow its actual teachings.  Which is why Democrats have demanded that Christians be barred and banned from being able to exercise their religion and their religious freedom in every practical way imaginable, even as they impose THEIR religion of secular humanism time and time and time again.

And yes, atheism and secular humanism ARE religions:

Atheists Score Major Win In Federal Court
by Jack Jenkins Nov 3, 2014 9:59am

A federal district court in Oregon has declared Secular Humanism a religion, paving the way for the non-theistic community to obtain the same legal rights as groups such as Christianity.

On Thursday, October 30, Senior District Judge Ancer Haggerty issued a ruling on American Humanist Association v. United States, a case that was brought by the American Humanist Association (AHA) and Jason Holden, a federal prisoner. Holden pushed for the lawsuit because he wanted Humanism — which the AHA defines as “an ethical and life-affirming philosophy free of belief in any gods and other supernatural forces” — recognized as a religion so that his prison would allow for the creation of a Humanist study group. Haggerty sided with the plaintiffs in his decision, citing existing legal precedent and arguing that denying Humanists the same rights as groups such as Christianity would be highly suspect under the Establishment Clause in the U.S. Constitution, which declares that Congress “shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

“The court finds that Secular Humanism is a religion for Establishment Clause purposes,” the ruling read.

The decision highlights the unusual position of the Humanist community, which has tried for years to obtain the same legal rights as more traditional religious groups while simultaneously rebuking the existence of a god or gods. But while some Humanists may chafe at being called a “religion,” others feel that the larger pursuit of equal rights trumps legal classifications.

Mind you, you can google the phrase, “Religion is man’s way to reach God; Christianity is God’s way to reach man” and find that many Christians reject that CHRISTIANITY is a “religion.”  But it is only Democrats’ atheists and secular humanists who get to play both sides of the field and represent themselves as NOT being a “religion” whenever it suits them as they tear down “religion” but they ARE a “religion” whenever it suits them as they apply the “if you can’t beat them, join them” in order to be a “Fifth Column and destroy religion from within” tactic.

Meanwhile they get to impose their atheist and secular humanist RELIGIOUS VALUES all over the damn place as they impose their tyrannous religion on everybody else.  All while loudly asserting that they’re somehow “protecting us from religion.”

Because to be a “Democrat” is to be a “moral cockroach hypocrite.”

When you’re screaming in hell, Democrat – and one day, soon, mark my words, you WILL BE screaming in hell – I just want you to remember that you’re not burning in hell for your blatant abandonment of MY morality.  No, you’re be burning in hell for your OWN hypocrite double-standards where what was right became what was wrong because you’re a twisted pervert and what was wrong became right because you’re a twisted pervert.  You’re going to burn in hell by your OWN standard, applied to YOU by the very God Whose authority you dedicated your life to trying to end.

So I’ll tell you what’s going to happen here: that poor virtuous Kentucky Clerk, Kim Davis, is going to be persecuted and punished in the name of “the law” by the same lawless thug system that has been running roughshod over the law for the past six damn years.  And our “justice” system is going to do it, because:

“The law has become paralyzed, and there is no justice in the courts. The wicked far outnumber the righteous, so that justice has become perverted.” — Habakkuk 1:4

Which is why I am now calling “judges” INjustices.  They have nothing to do with “justice” any more.

God announced that He was going to bring HELL to such a wicked nation.  Start reading from verse five on to see that.  And He’s preparing this country for the same fate.

But don’t worry.  Democrats have ended God’s authority.  The God of the Bible is now powerless, they triumphantly assert: only godless, wicked human government is omnipotent and has the divine right to crush any obstacle in its unholy path.

 

Of Donald Trump’s Rabidly Stupid Remarks And His Pig-headed Determination To Stand By Them

July 20, 2015

Let me just begin by prefacing thus: there are a LOT of reasons to attack John McCain.  For simple starters he’s a RHINO – which for politically illiterate is an acronym meaning “Republican In Name Only” – who has made a career out of splitting the difference by betraying conservatives.  I voted for him in the general election, because my alternative was a backstabber or the damned devil, but no way was that turd my primary vote.

So there are a LOT of ways that a reasonable person could reasonably attack John McCain.  Heck, one of those ways involves the very category of “prisoner of war” that Donald Trump attacked McCain on.  Certainly Trump had every right to go after John McCain for saying that 15,000 American citizens living in McCain’s own state of Arizona were “crazies.”

But for the official record the way that Donald Trump viciously attacked John McCain simply for BEING a prisoner of war is beneath the pale of decency or dignity.  And Donald Trump seriously needs to be fired by every decent American for his stupid idiotic indecency.

Donald Trump said the following about John McCain:

Luntz: “He’s a war hero. He’s a war hero …”

Trump: “He’s not a war hero …”

Luntz: “He’s war hero.”

Trump: “He is a war hero …”

Luntz: “Five and half years in a Vietnamese prison camp …”

Trump: “He’s a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren’t captured. So he’s a war hero …”

Luntz: “Do you agree with that?”

Trump: “He’s a war hero, because he was captured, okay? I believe, perhaps, he’s a war hero. But right now he said some very bad things about a lot of people. So what I said is John McCain, I disagree with him that these people aren’t crazy.”

Okay, Trump had his say.  But here is something called the ACTUAL DAMN FACTS as to how John McCain became a P.O.W.:

On October 26, 1967, McCain was flying his twenty-third mission, part of a twenty-plane strike force against the Yen Phu thermal power plant in central Hanoi[102][103] that previously had almost always been off-limits to U.S. raids due to the possibility of collateral damage.[101] Arriving just before noon, McCain dove from 9,000 to 4,000 feet on his approach;[104] as he neared the target, warning systems in McCain’s A-4E Skyhawk alerted him that he was being tracked by enemy fire-control radar.[105] Like other U.S. pilots in similar situations, he did not break off the bombing run,[62] and he held his dive until he released his bombs at about 3,500 feet (1,000 m).[106] As he started to pull up, the Skyhawk’s wing was blown off by a Soviet-made SA-2 anti-aircraft missile fired by the North Vietnamese Air Defense Command’s 61st Battalion,[101][104] commanded by Captain Nguyen Lan[104] and with fire control officer Lieutenant Nguyen Xuan Dai.[101][104] (McCain was later awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for this day,[100] while Nguyen Xuan Dai was awarded the title Hero of the People’s Armed Forces.[101] Decades later, Soviet Army Lieutenant Yuri Trushechkin claimed that he had been the missile guidance officer who had shot McCain down.[107][108] In any case, the raid was a failure, as the power plant was not damaged and three of the Navy planes were shot down.[104])

McCain being pulled out of Trúc Bạch Lake in Hanoi and about to become a prisoner of war,[109] on October 26, 1967.

McCain’s plane went into a vertical inverted spin.[110] Bailing out upside down at high speed,[111] the force of the ejection fractured McCain’s right arm in three places, his left arm, and his right leg at the knee, and knocked him unconscious.[111][112] McCain nearly drowned after parachuting into Trúc Bạch Lake in Hanoi; the weight of his equipment was pulling him down, and as he regained consciousness, he could not use his arms.[105] Eventually, he was able to inflate his life vest using his teeth.[105] Several Vietnamese, possibly led by Department of Industry clerk Mai Van On, pulled him ashore.[113] A mob gathered around, spat on him, kicked him, and stripped him of his clothes; his left shoulder was crushed with the butt of a rifle and he was bayoneted in his left foot and abdominal area.[105][111][112] He was then transported to Hanoi’s main Hỏa Lò Prison, nicknamed the “Hanoi Hilton” by American POWs.[114]

McCain reached Hoa Lo in as bad a physical condition as any prisoner during the war.[114] His captors refused to give him medical care unless he gave them military information; they beat and interrogated him, but McCain only offered his name, rank, serial number, and date of birth[115][116] (the only information he was required to provide under the Geneva Conventions and permitted to give under the U.S. Code of Conduct).[104] Soon thinking he was near death, McCain said he would give them more information if taken to the hospital,[115] hoping he could then put his interrogators off once he was treated.[117] A prison doctor came and said it was too late, as McCain was about to die anyway.[115] Only when the North Vietnamese discovered that his father was a top admiral did they give him medical care,[115] calling him “the crown prince”.[114] Two days after McCain’s plane went down, that event and his status as a POW made the front pages of The New York Times[92] and The Washington Post.[118] Interrogation and beatings resumed in the hospital; McCain gave the North Vietnamese his ship’s name, squadron’s name, and the attack’s intended target.[119] This information, along with personal details of McCain’s life and purported statements by McCain about the war’s progress, would appear over the next two weeks in the North Vietnamese official newspaper Nhân Dân[104] as well as in dispatches from outlets such as the Cuban news agency Prensa Latina.[120] Disclosing the military information was in violation of the Code of Conduct, which McCain later wrote he regretted, although he saw the information as being of no practical use to the North Vietnamese.[121] Further coerced to give future targets, he named cities that had already been bombed, and responding to demands for the names of his squadron’s members, he supplied instead the names of the Green Bay Packersoffensive line.[119][122]

It’s not like John McCain did a Bowe Bergdahl and abandoned his fellow soldiers to seek out and subsequently provide aid and comfort to the enemy.  John McCain is a combat veteran who had honorably served his country in time of war in 22 previous missions before being shot out of the sky, terribly wounded, and pulled out of a lake where he nearly drowned.  He was easily taken prisoner because his arms were too injured to move and one of his legs was useless.  The obvious implication is “JUST WHAT THE HELL WAS THE GUY SUPPOSED TO DO?”

Let me ask some follow-up questions of Donald Trump:

1) Are you seriously telling me that you possessed – in spite of your own lies about dodging the draft and your five damned deferments – that you possessed far superior fighter jet aviator training such that there is no way you could have ever possibly been shot down out of the sky by an anti-aircraft missile?  Is that your story, The Donald?  That had it been YOU in that cockpit the man who repeatedly obtained deferral after deferall rather than serve in the war that you insinuated John McCain was some kind of coward for having actually FOUGHT in you would have used your superior hair weave to duck and dodge the missiles that took McCain’s aircraft out???  Because you are Trump the CHUMP if that’s your testimony, you worthless boastful punk.

2) Is it your suggestion that John McCain would have been braver had he done what YOU would have done – because YOU’RE the one who dodged fighting in a war with your superior skills in compiling an impressive number of student deferments – and by simply refusing to serve in the first place???  Is THAT what you’re saying?  That cowardice is the better part compared to valor???  Are you saying that at the first sign that you were being tracked by enemy radar, that you would have bailed on your mission as John McCain failed to do because unlike you he actually IS a war hero???

3) Or maybe you’re suggesting to us that had it been YOU that had been shot down by a missile, had it been YOU who were shot down “in as bad physical condition as any prisoner during the war” – that you would have tied your ridiculously expensive business-suit’s accompanying necktie around your head like the businessman-version of Rambo and killed 10,000 North Vietnamese with your bare hands as you crawled your way to the border on your ruined knee???  Maybe THAT is what you’re saying, you pathetic little turd???

But actually I think what Donald Trump is really telling us is that 4) Trump the Chump looks at Adolf Hitler and says, “Now there is one awesome badass great LEADER!”  Allow me to provide illustrations of what I mean before I explain myself further:

Regarding Adolf Hitler: the Führer had a nasty habit of giving orders to his soldiers such that “Every man shall fight or fall where he stands.”  He REPEATDLY ordered his units to die fighting rather than surrender or even merely withdrawal rather than be overrun.  As one US military analysis of Hitler’s “leadership” we have the following typical statement (see page 22):

Hitler’s unrelenting policy of no retreat at Stalingrad cost thousands of German soldiers’ lives. According to James Duffy, “It was a policy of fanatical resistance. On October 14, 1942, Hitler issued this order to his troops: ‘Every leader, down to squad leader must be convinced of his sacred duty to stand fast come what may even if the enemy outflanks him on the right and left, even if his part of the line is cut off, encircled, overrun by tanks, enveloped in smoke or gassed.’”

One of Hitler’s own generals said of his “leadership”:

And there were, for Hitler the commander, some deeper flaws as German Field Marshal Erich von Manstein observed: “He was a man who saw fighting only in terms of the utmost brutality. His way of thinking conformed more to a mental picture of masses of the enemy bleeding to death before our lines than to the conception of a subtle fencer who knows how to make an occasional step backwards in order to lunge for the decisive thrust. For the art of war he substituted a brutal force which, as he saw it, was guaranteed maximum effectiveness by the will-power behind it…. Despite the pains Hitler took to stress his own former status as a frontline soldier, I still never had the feeling that his heart belonged to the fighting troops. Losses, as far as he was concerned, were merely figures which reduced fighting power. They are unlikely to have seriously disturbed him as a human being.”

Another German general, Alfred Jodl, described “Hitler’s almost mystical conviction of his own infallibility as leader of the nation and of the war.”  Which I personally see fitting Donald Trump to a “T” when you listen to Trump’s idiotic and fanciful statements that he’d build a border wall and make Mexico pay for it or from a position of weakness and debtor (WE owe THEM trillions of dollars) somehow end up owning them because of course he’s just that darn great.

And just before he shot himself to death like a coward rather than actually die fighting the way he had ordered millions of his own men to do, Hitler decreed:

‘The armed forces have lied to me and now the SS has left me in the lurch. The German people has not fought heroically. It deserves to perish.

‘It is not I who have lost the war, but the German people’.”

So under a Hitler – and yeah, under a Trump the Chump – you pretty much have two choices as a soldier: die fighting or just die.  Otherwise you’re a coward.

Now, Hitler said he couldn’t fight because he might get merely wounded instead of killed and then be captured:

“He said that he could not go out and die fighting on the barricades as he was afraid of merely being wounded and captured by the Russians. He would therefore shoot himself.”

And we couldn’t have that, could we?  So he ordered his men to die rather than give one inch of ground while he himself cowered in the concrete bunker that the millions serving him were ordered to die to protect.  And then there’s Trump the Chump, who in spite of his four student deferments before finally managing to find some doctor who was willing to say that Trump was too much of a pathetic little physical wuss to serve, that somehow John McCain should have died fighting in spite of having just sustained terrible wounds after being shot out of the sky by a missile.

I think it’s 4), myself.  Not that the other three make Trump look like anything other than an outright idiot, but personally I find 4) the most terrifying indictment of Trump the Chump of all of the above.

Under a Trump the Chump Führer-in-chieftainship, if President Trump the Chump orders a fascist-style banzai charge, you run into machine gun fire screaming and you die.  But what you are NOT allowed to do under ANY circumstances possible is to allow yourself to be captured for any reason under the Rising Sun.

In the aforementioned Imperial fascist Rising Sun mentality, we have soldiers that a President Trump the Chump could approve of:

LAURENCE REES: And how can we understand the reasons for what you call the ‘suicidal mentality’ of the Japanese?

AKIRA IRIYE: Some people trace it back all the way to the feudal ethos. I think it seems to be a combination of two things. One is belief in Japanese national uniqueness, again this is an insular mentality, summed up in the sense that Japan is a unique country unlike any other country that can do things that no other country can do, and things like that. And this sense of uniqueness is combined with the Emperor worship. Again this is rather a recent origin: in the 1870s and 1880s the government decided to rally national opinion around the image of the Sacred Emperor, because this Emperor system seemed to be a long living line of Emperors; that is the longevity of the imperial line. Japan was unique and you died for your country but in fact you died for your Emperor, everything was in the name of the Emperor.  In war, in battle, [soldiers] fought for the sake of honouring the Emperor, that kind of thing. That is one, mental attitude.

And the second reason is a more material kind of reason. That is that the Japanese army is much more poorly equipped. So the Japanese say, well, maybe we’re not as good in producing so many weapons as the Americans, but we have this spiritual aspect to it, that we can fight not simply with guns, but we can fight with our spirit. That spirit is the spirit of our selflessness and this is nothing that is part of your fighting. You know this famous exhortation not to be taken prisoner of war because they say to be taken prisoner of war is a shameful thing. Why? Because it shows that you have not fought till the very end. To fight to the very end is to honour the Emperor and to show that you can compensate for meagre weapons by using yourself, perhaps as a human shield, or in a suicide attack.

For these reasons I think even as early as the Russian/Japanese War you get lots of Japanese casualties because they believe in it, that death in battle is an honourable thing. I would think that there were so few Japanese prisoners of war taken by the Russians because they either committed suicide or they just fought to the very end before the Russians could capture them. The same is true in the 1930’s as well. I think you brought dishonour to your family and to your parents if you were caught prisoner during the war, so for these reasons I think there is a sense that the war is never finished until the last man dies. And the last man dies because that’s what they’re supposed to do.

LAURENCE REES: How can we understand here in the West this phenomenal cultural pressure on the individual to conform?

AKIRA IRIYE: I think there is no question about that. I think a kind of collective mentality, or collectivist mentality, and also the idea that you are a member of this family, and what you do brings dishonour to your parents, but not only that, to the Emperor too. This is the whole idea of the nation as one family with the Emperor as the Divine Head. So whatever you do you are bringing either honour or dishonour to the Emperor. There’s nothing in between. So to die is more honourable than to live. I think the conception of life and death, things like that, are maybe at the basis of this. No individual thinking here. Of course there were people who were not that way, but they would not be able to express their opinion more clearly or more frankly during the war because of the mentality of wartime Japan.

Under the Western and American concept of warfare, you are ordered to place yourself at risk.  You are ordered into harm’s way.  You are ordered to fight the enemy.  But in the face of certain death, you are NOT required to die.  Americans are individuals, not herd animals.  You fight honorably, but you have the right to surrender when you have no other option but certain death.

But Trump the Chump’s remark which was tantamount to an assertion that every single prisoner of war was somehow a failure has nothing whatsoever to do with the Western or American concept of a soldier honorably serving on a field of battle; it is straight out of Hitler and it is straight out of Imperial Japanese fascist emperor-worship.

So under Emperor Trump, you die fighting for the glory and honor of “The Donald.”  A Trump the Chump cannot understand why you would not be willing to take a few hundred bullets for him.

To allow a Donald Trump to be anywhere NEAR the office of the president of the United States is simply evil.  We fought a terrible war to kick people like Donald Trump out of their dictatorships.

And the man is so pig-headed that he cannot admit that he made a mistake any more than the CURRENT DISGRACE-IN-CHIEF contaminating our White House.

Allow me to now point out that this isn’t the first incredibly wrong thing that Donald Trump has said.  What Donald Trump said about illegal immigrants was beneath the pale of dignity, as well.

Understand, I am fiercely opposed to illegal immigration.  I believe that we should be fighting with everything we’ve got to dismantle a system whereby people are encouraged to essentially put themselves at the head of the line ahead of all the people trying to enter America from all around the world LEGALLY by ignoring our laws and just flooding into this country.  BUT my beef is NOT with the people coming into America, but with ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.  Whereas Trump the Chump personally demonized the character of pretty much nearly ALL illegal immigrants.

Allow me to contrast my own belief about illegal immigrants vis-à-vis the system tolerating and even encouraging illegal immigration from a prior article to Donald Trump’s vindictive statements:

Let me assure you of something: if Hispanic illegal immigrants voted Republican, you would see the rabid, poison-dripping FANGS of Democrats come out in a spirit of rage and hate unlike nothing you’ve ever seen on the faces of Republicans as they went completely poop-flinging nuts over the invasion of our border.

I attend a church that has an English and Hispanic congregation.  And I regularly take part in ministry to Hispanics, quite a few of which are here illegally.  As a true Christian, I DON’T hate illegal immigrants.  I realize as a moral human being that if I were a poor Mexican or Central American living in a completely failed state the way these people are, I would come to America too – either legally or illegally.  I recognize that for many illegal immigrants, work is a good thing that they are grateful for.  And that they send a lot of the money they earn home to their families.  These are virtuous things.  What I rabidly despise is a cynical and dishonest liberal ideology that wants to politically benefit from these poor people’s misery and ignorance.  I blame the left for its hostility to America as they seek to cynically grab further political advantages by exploiting these people.  Liberals are like drunken braggarts in a bar, buying drinks for everyone in order to be popular and then refusing to pay the tab when the bill comes.  America cannot afford to continue living so wildly and wickedly beyond our means.  We are going to completely economically and socially collapse because of the vile wickedness of Democrats.  And then you will see suffering as you have never seen before – suffering that Democrats forced upon the America that they destroyed.

I believe, therefore, that we ought to treat the illegal immigrants who are coming here as human beings.  And that we should protect our nation, protect our borders, protect our culture, protect our way of life by controlling our borders and enforcing our laws.

You see the difference?  I recognize that many, MANY illegal immigrants are good and decent people whose ultimate crime is to give themselves and their families a better life than they could ever get in the pathologically broken system that is Mexico and much of Central America.  Are there terrible criminal illegal immigrants?  Okay, yes.  But on the same token, are there terrible criminal LEGAL immigrants?  Yep.  And for that matter, are there terrible criminal native-born American CITIZENS?  Oh, you betcha, there are.

My theory on illegal immigration is that we need to profoundly reform our SYSTEM.  We need to begin by first changing the law that BROKE our system: the 1965 law that “reformed” our system that had previously favored immigrants with vital job skills that this nation desperately needed in order to maintain the best industrial base in the world to one whose central purpose was reuniting families.  Should we have a system that emphasizes more doctors, more engineers, more mechanics, more skilled workers, more trained people who can help build America, or should we bring in every single family member of the immigrants who are already here?  Democrats broke our system by preferring the latter over the former.  And that inaugurated a flood of immigration that has NOT made America better, but worse, not richer, but poorer.  We certainly also need to aggressively patrol our borders and deport the people who should not be here.

But we shouldn’t demonize the millions of people who came here seeking a better life.  And I believe that if I were a Mexican and my country was broken the way Mexico was broken and America gave me a chance for building a better life for my family, I would come here to.  And no I would NOT be a “rapist” for doing so, contrary to Trump the Chump.

As a conservative and as a Republican, I demand that we continue to make a distinction between being “anti-illegal immigration” versus being “anti-immigrant.”  And I believe Donald Trump stupidly crossed a line and should have apologized immediately rather than “doubling down” as is apparently the only trick of this one-trick pony.

If you exclude Donald Trump’s giving since 2012 – when he decided he was a “Republican,” Donald Trump has actually given more money to the DEMOCRAT Party over the previous 26 years.  Prior to 2012, Trump gave $581,350 to DEMOCRATS versus only $497,690 to the GOP.  But even when you factor in Trump’s total giving, the man hardly stands as a genuine Republican.  Politifact acknowledges that “Trump has actually been relatively evenhanded in doling out cash to the two parties” and that “The difference in donations is almost entirely captured in Trump’s recent giving” when Trump went from 1989 to 2012 giving MORE to Democrats to giving $463,450 to Republicans against $3,500 to Democrats.  Personally, I would just assume that my Republican president hadn’t only been one for three years and had been a Democrat prior to that.

The man clearly is NO spokesman for the Republican Party or Republican Party values.  And as just one shining example of the hypocritical and opportunistic demagogue that Trump the Chump truly is, he actually attacked Mitt Romney’s very moderate position on illegal immigration as “mean-spirited” in 2012.  Which may mean that while he isn’t the racist he’s coming off as being, what he in fact is is a dishonest demagogue who will say whatever the hell will get him the attention that this arrogant blowhard narcissist clearly seems to need.

Donald Trump needs to be made to shut up and go away.  And yes, anybody who actually thinks that this fool ought to be president IS certainly a “crazy” from this point on, if he or she wasn’t one already.

Finger Pointing Over Murdered American Woman: San Francisco, Obama Say It’s Other’s Fault. BOTH Are Utterly EVIL. As Is Hillary Clinton.

July 10, 2015

As we speak, the Sheriff of San Francisco County says it’s all Obama’s ICE’s fault that the illegal immigrant who had been convicted of seven felonies and deported five times before he found his heart in San Francisco and realized he was immune from justice and from whatever you want to call “the law” when liberals are in charge.

And, of course, the Sheriff is absolutely right.  Barack Obama has the blood of Kathryn Steinle – along with at least 121 other murdered Americans – on his hands due to his wicked policies that free vicious criminals because they are illegal immigrants and Obama is the very worst kind of cynical partisan demagogue.

This murderous turd Juan-Francisco Lopez-Sanchez is merely ONE of more than 347,000 illegal immigrant criminals that Obama has released.

We know that Barack Hussein Obama is completely responsible for this vile policy of catch and release criminals whenever they happen to be illegal immigrants for several reasons: 1) is that he’s already done it hundreds of thousands of times; 2) is that he viciously went after the Arizona Law claiming that the federal government has sole and solitary sovereignty whenever it comes to any matter involving our borders, border security or the treatment of illegal immigrants, but there are more than 200 cities, counties and states in America that are considered “sanctuary cities” – and REQUIRE a refusal to cooperate with federal authorities seeking to deport an illegal immigrant – and Obama has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to go after these lawless liberals the way he made an example of the ONE conservative state that actually tried to stop the flood of illegal criminals from pouring into Arizona; and 3) is this:

The head of ICE, Ms. Saldaña, was very clearly ordered by the Obama administration to completely reverse herself after she made the mistake of representing her agency and her officers as opposed to the partisan political agenda of Obama:

Thank you. Amen, yes. Crack down on the sanctuary cities is what she said, but the very next day, Friday March 20, a complete reversal after the ACLU, immigrants rights groups and others pressured the White House and presto, the head of ICE makes a shocking about face. This time in writing, though, saying, quote, ‘[a]ny effort at federal legislation now to mandate state and local law enforcement’s compliance with ICE detainers will, in our view, be a highly counterproductive step and lead to more resistance and less cooperation in overall efforts to promote public safety.” What happened to thank you, amen yes a day earlier? And now, after clear evidence that it is not interested in a sanctuary city crackdown, this administration tells reporters it can’t comment on whether the President backs the sheriff or the policies in this case?

The Obama White House refuses to answer questions. They say talk to Homeland Security – having of course ordered Homeland Security not to answer any questions or to pass the buck to San Francisco.

So Obama and his lawless thugs are trying to point fingers at San Francisco, but their fingers, their toes, their heads, and everything else are coated in BLOOD.  And it is not only irrational but immoral for the Obama White House to try to dodge responsibility for their ONGOING SUPPORT OF THESE SANCTUARY CITY POLICIES.

There’s also a 4) and here it is presented by Megyn Kelly:

This sheriff himself a convicted criminal says, he stands by the city’s policy. Kate’s murder has since exploded into a national debate on illegal immigrant, sanctuary cities in crime. With the White House ducking the issue of its own acquiescence in these city’s decision to flout the federal immigration laws which were duly enacted. When asked repeatedly this week to speak to this case, White House Spokesman Josh Earnest declined to weigh in other than to refer folks to the Department of Homeland Security. A stark contrast to what we saw after Michael Brown was killed in Ferguson, Missouri. A man we now know was attacking a police officer at the time of his death. His funeral saw three Obama officials in attendance, his death drew comments from President Obama personally. And the administration also sent in the DOJ and 40 FBI agents dispatched to Missouri after Michael Brown was killed.

Where is the swarm of agents in San Francisco? Then there was Freddie Gray in Baltimore, a repeat drug offender who was killed in police custody. Here again his funeral was attended by three Obama administration officials and again the President spoke personally to Freddie Gray’s death. And again, sent the DOJ in to investigate. When Trayvon Martin was killed in Florida, the President spoke to his death which was later ruled to be in self-defense. But Kate Steinle, nothing. No comments, no swarm of FBI agents, no DOJ investigation, nothing. Why?

And just in case you think I’ve run out of reasons why Barack Hussein Obama is entirely to blame for this murderer being released to murder and frankly ought to be impeached for the high crime and misdemeanor of aiding and abetting in the commission of a felony murder, there’s a 5):

Barack Hussein Obama is a lawless criminal thug who has ordered his top immigration enforcement officials to refuse to cooperate with the law. After a judge specifically ordered these officials to stop doing what was illegal, they continued to do their wicked Führer’s wicked and flagrantly criminal bidding. Obama criminally and illegally issued some 2,000 unlawful work authorizations in flagrant violation of federal law and continued to do so even after being ordered to cease and desist.

Which simply is one more example of many examples of a strategy that our lawless thug in chief routinely employs: to only bother with enforcing or allowing to be enforced laws that our naked ideologue fascist thug-in-chief wants to enforce, and to hell with all the laws he doesn’t like.  As Politico reports:

Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws
By STEVE FRIESS | 6/16/12 7:02 AM EDT  Updated: 6/16/12 8:21 PM EDT

President Barack Obama returned Friday to a trusted tactic — satisfying his political allies by not doing something.

Conservatives were angry when Janet Napolitano announced the administration would stop deporting certain undocumented immigrants, but they should have seen it coming. On issue after issue — gay rights, drug enforcement, Internet gambling, school achievement standards — the administration has chosen to achieve its goals by a method best described as passive-aggressive

Rather than pushing new laws through a divided Congress to enact his agenda, Obama is relying on federal agencies to ignore, or at least not defend, laws that some of his important supporters — like Hispanic voters and the gay community — don’t like.

“If the president says we’re not going to enforce the law, there’s really nothing anyone can do about it,” University of Pennsylvania constitutional law professor Kermit Roosevelt said. “It’s clearly a political calculation.”

I hope you notice how prominent a far leftist approach to illegal immigration is to Obama’s lawless criminal thuggery.  I also hope you notice that being a lawless, fascist THUG is the core of Obama.  The Bible calls it “the mystery of lawlessness” that we would see in the very final days just before the ultimate political beast otherwise known as the Antichrist comes.  We were told in advance that wickedness and lawlessness would abound and the righteous would be stunned at the inability to do a damn thing about it.

But I suspect there’s a liberal out there who thinks, “No WAY he’s got a sixth reason to blame Kate Steinle’s murder on my messiah.”  Well, I actually do.  So here’s reason 6):

Obama has said at least 22 times that he didn’t have the power to shield illegal immigrants: and then did in blatant and criminal defiance of the Constitution what he himself said he didn’t have the power to do.  According to Obama’s despicable and treasonous actions – again, not according to me but to Obama’s own previous statements – Barack Obama is not a president, but a KING, he’s not a president of the United States, he’s an EMPEROR.  And he is entirely responsible for the mess that he has created as our tyrannous emperor god-king.

Again, the day Barack Hussein Obama raised his demon-possessed fingers and took the oath of office, Kate Steinle’s murder became a fait accompli.  Obama and liberalism murdered that woman, straight up.

Now, mind you, the Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi is a liberal, and therefore evil, and San Francisco is as evil and therefore as liberal as it gets.  So it should surprise NO ONE that Sheriff didn’t even bother to acknowledge the murdered victim until he was nearly finished with his smarmy lecture – and when he finally deigned to do so, he mispronounced her name.

Realize that the liberal, wicked city of San Francisco ACTUALLY REQUESTED THIS MURDEROUS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT TURD FROM FEDERAL CUSTODY JUST SO THEY COULD RELEASE HIM:

A bitter dispute over who bears responsibility for the release of Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, the five times-deported illegal alien who fatally shot Kathryn Steinle last week in San Francisco, has taken a surprise twist with the revelation that the San Francisco sheriff’s department asked the Federal Bureau of Prisons for custody of the 45-year-old Mexican national back in March.

The San Francisco Chronicle is reporting that the San Francisco sheriff’s department, which is headed by progressive sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, submitted a letter to the Bureau of Prisons on March 23 asking to be notified “when [Lopez-Sanchez is ready for our pick-up.”

Lopez-Sanchez was at the end of a 46-month sentence in a federal prison in Victorville, Cal. for felony illegal re-entry. But San Francisco had a $5,000 bench warrant from 1995 on Lopez-Sanchez for a marijuana possession for sale case, and the sheriff’s department sought to take custody of him.

And then there is Hillary Rodham Clinton.  Right now this cynical political whore who stands for NOTHING but her own naked power and self-enrichment at the tit of big government and the worst kind of crony capitalism is piling on the evil sanctuary city policies that led to this unholy murder. But let’s take a look at the real Hilllary Rodham Clinton who dove into Kate Steinle’s blood and did a “blood angel”:

Hillary Clinton Supports Sanctuary Cities That Protect Dangerous Illegal Immigrants, Would Expand Similar Policies
Clinton’s past support of sanctuary cities, along with her recently stated intention to expand President Obama’s immigration actions, indicates that if elected president, she probably won’t crack down on the more than 200 state and local jurisdictions that have policies that call for not honoring ICE requests.
By Taylor Tyler | Jul 07, 2015 10:57 AM EDT

Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton is taking heat from pundits over her previous unabashed support of sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities and thereby afford deportation protection to illegal immigrants.

Kate Steinle’s tragic murder could likely have been prevented if the city of San Francisco had notified U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement of 45-year-old Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez’s release from its custody, yet due to the city’s decades-long sanctuary policy, he was released onto the streets without a word, where he went on to kill 32-year-old Steinle. Sanchez had already been deported five times and convicted of seven felonies.

Clinton’s past support of sanctuary cities, along with her recently stated intention to expand President Obama’s immigration actions, indicates that if elected president, she probably won’t crack down on the more than 200 state and local jurisdictions that have policies that call for not honoring ICE requests, notes The Daily Caller.

It was in September 2007 when then-Sen. Clinton said during a presidential debate that she supported sanctuary cities because they help ensure the “personal safety and security of all the citizens.”

“If local law enforcement begins to act like immigration officers, what that means is that you will have people not reporting crimes,” she said. “You will have people hiding from the police. And I think that is a real direct threat to the personal safety and security of all the citizens. So this is a result of the failure of the federal government and that’s where it needs to be fixed.”

Debate moderator Tim Russert then asked Clinton, “You would allow the sanctuary cities to disobey the federal law?”

Clinton responded, “Well, I don’t think there is any choice. The ICE groups go in and raid individuals, but if you’re the local police chief and you’re trying to solve a crime that you know people from the immigrant community have information about, they may not talk to you if they also think you are going to be enforcing immigration laws. Local law enforcement has a different job than federal immigration enforcement. The problem is the federal government has totally abdicated its responsibility.”

Clinton expressed her support again in 2008 in an interview with Bill O’Reilly of Fox News:

“Are you going to crack down on the sanctuary cities,” O’Reilly asked, to which Clinton responded, “No, I’m not.”

More recently, in May, Clinton pledged to expand President Obama’s executive immigration actions, which have further legitimized sanctuary cities.

“If Congress refuses to act, as president I would do everything possible under the law to go even further,” Clinton said, reported The Washington Examiner. “I will fight to stop the partisan attacks on the president’s executive actions.”

Jessica Vaughan, policy director of the Center for Immigration Studies, explained to The Daily Caller what a Clinton White House could look like.

“Hillary Clinton’s recent public statements indicate that she intends to outdo the Obama administration in dismantling immigration laws, so there is good reason to be concerned that this problem would get worse under a Clinton administration, and that more local governments would either be encouraged or coerced into obstructing ICE,” Vaughan said. “I would expect another Clinton administration to stoop to the same kind of legal hi-jinks, abuse of authority, disregard of safety and security, and then evasion of accountability, much as we witnessed when she was Secretary of State.”

Yes, there was a time when Hillary Clinton took the exact OPPOSITE view, just like she took many other exact opposite views such as leading the support for the Iraq War before being one of the most hypocritical turncoats on the very war that she supported to the betrayal of the American serviceman who had to continue to fight the war she betrayed.  Here she is saying she was opposed to sanctuary cities because as a liberal progressive NAZI all Hillary Clinton really gives a damn about is her own power and she will betray any one or any thing or any principle to grab that power:

“I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants.” — Hillary Rodham Clinton, 2003

Note that when it was politically expedient to do so, Hillary Clinton wasn’t just “adamantly against illegal immigration,” NO: she was against IMMIGRANTS.  The leftist propaganda media loves to frame Republicans as “anti-immigrant,” but here’s the POSTER BITCH for being “adamantly against immigrants.”  Further, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are only “adamantly against” anything that would get in the way of their god Lucifer taking over the United States of America after they’re finished kicking Jesus Christ to the curb; that’s the ONLY thing they’re “adamantly opposed” to.  For anything else, they’ll be adamantly against it before they’re just as adamantly for it before they’re adamantly against it again.  And all that matters to them is that they can lie, lie, lie their way to power and to more power.

Basically, liberalism is evil.  Liberals are evil.  And every resident of San Francisco and frankly every single American deserves to die because the people we put in power are fascist cockroaches from hell.

Here’s an idea: make sanctuary cities the next Confederate flag: ban them, ban anyone who now does or ever HAS supported them, burn them all down to the ground.  Or just wallow in your disgusting hypocrisy.

Obama Completely Unworthy Of Trust When It Comes To His Toxic Nuclear Deal With The Ayatollah

March 2, 2015

Pardon my confusion here, but I need someone to please explain to me how Obama knows everything – and I mean absolutely everything – that is going on inside Iran’s incredibly secretive nuclear program, but he had no clue that Iraq and Iran were about to launch an attack against the Islamic State on Tikrit???

Iraq’s Attack Against ISIS Catches U.S. ‘By Surprise’
03.02.15
Nancy A. Youssef

The biggest offensive against ISIS so far happened without American help—but with plenty of assistance from Iran.

The Iraqi military launched a major campaign to take back a key city from the self-proclaimed Islamic State over the weekend—a move that caught the U.S. “by surprise,” in the words of one American government official.

The U.S.-led coalition forces that have conducted seven months of airstrikes on Iraq’s behalf did not participate in the attack, defense officials told The Daily Beast, and the American military has no plans to chip in.

Why does Obama ignore crystal clear warnings from the International Atomic Energy Agency such as this one

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has “further corroborated” information indicating that Iran “has carried out activities that are relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device,” the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog says in its most recent report on Iran.

– and inherently trust Iran and his own ability to verify with certainty what a demonstrated dishonest and duplicitous regime is up to, while inherently distrusting key historic US ally Israel???

I  mean, would any of you Democrat Obama worshipers explain this to me, please?  Because I believe I’m on pretty damn solid ground to point out the FACT that Obama is a freaking demon-possessed LIAR to argue that we can verify ANY-DAMN-THING Iran is doing when we can’t even know what they’re doing in a country where we’ve got  all kinds of people in.

And just what are the details of Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran?  You don’t get to know, because Obama is hiding it.  He knows how horrible it is.

And the Israeli people know how horrible it is, given the fact that nearly three-fourths of them know that Obama does not have their interest in his heart and is siding with their most bitter enemies.

Arab nations know how horrible it will be, too.  Which is why everyone who isn’t a terrorist or a sponsor of terrorism is opposed to Obama’s deal.  We can pretty much guarantee a nuclear arms race in the craziest part of the world, thanks to Obama.

For 2,000 years, Jews were stateless, voiceless, defenseless and therefore passive to the threats to annihilate them.

Obama looks back to those good old days when Jews silently went to their graves without being able to defend themselves or speak out.

He wants to offer Iran – notwithstanding that Obama is such a weak, pathetic, gutless negotiator with America’s most terrifying enemies that the Ayatollah literally mocks him for it

“Are Americans afraid of getting casualties on the ground in Iraq?” asked Rouhani, referring to the Obama administration’s crystal clear pledge that it will not send American combat troops to fight ISIS. “Are they afraid of their soldiers being killed in the fight they claim is against terrorism?”

“If they want to use planes and if they want to use unmanned planes so that nobody is injured from the Americans, is it really possible to fight terrorism without any hardship, without any sacrifice?” he continued. “Is it possible to reach a big goal without that? In all regional and international issues, the victorious one is the one who is ready to do sacrifice.”

“When we say the red line we mean the red line,” said Rouhani…

– a sweetheart deal that will guarantee that Iran ultimately gets nuclear weapons and the ballistic missile technology to deliver them.  Obama will allow Iran – a country floating on oil that doesn’t need nuclear energy aside from the fact that it’s leaders have called Israel a “one bomb country” – to continue to enrich uranium; continue to build centrifuges; operate previously banned nuclear reactors – which will probably include the one that was secretly built and only now being revealed; and yeah, build ballistic missiles which are frankly useless unless they have nuclear warheads to put on them.

Oh, any any actual limits on Iran’s nuclear weapons plans have time limits to give Obama time to get out of office before his betrayal of America and Israel is obvious.

Why on earth should ANYONE trust a president who ran promising the most transparent administration in history but has in actual fact ran the LEAST TRANSPARENT ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY????  What do you say to explain this?

A review of every official exchange President Barack Obama has had with the press in 2014 in addition to interviews with more than a dozen reporters “reveals a White House determined to conceal its workings from the press, and by extension, the public,” the report reads.

What do you say about a president who looked every single American citizen in the eye over and over again and repeatedly told them lies such as “If you like the plan you have, you can keep it.  If you like the doctor you have, you can keep your doctor, too.  The only change you’ll see are falling costs as our reforms take hold.”

Barack Hussein Obama pompously and self-righteously delivered this lie a minimum of 37 times.  He is THE most documented liar of any human being who ever lived on planet earth, bar none.

Obama is the liar who over and over again stated that he did not have the power or the right to impose amnesty for illegal aliens before saying he never said what he said and then doing what he clearly is an “emperor” and

  • I know some here wish that I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself,” Obama said.  “But that’s not how our democracy works.”
  • “Believe me — the idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. (Laughter.) I promise you.  Not just on immigration reform.  (Laughter.) But that’s not how — that’s not how our system works.”
  • “This is something I’ve struggled with throughout my presidency.”  The problem is that, you know, I’m the president of the United States, I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed, and Congress right now has not changed what I consider to be a broken immigration system.”
  • In September 2013, Obama was asked by Telemundo if he would consider freezing deportations of the parents of students benefiting from the administration’s 2012 action.  Obama replied that if he broadened his protective orders, “then essentially I would be ignoring the law in a way that I think would be very difficult to defend legally.  So that’s not an option.”

So, yeah, by Obama’s own words delivered to his supporters, Obama IS in fact a lawless emperor thug who ignores the law, abolishes democracy and perverts the American system.

The next question is, “Did Obama change the law which the Constitution specifically states no president has the authority to do?”

Again, Obama’s own words to one of his supporters whose only problem with Obama is that Obama isn’t even MORE of a treasonous fascist tells us the truth:

Now, you’re absolutely right that there have been significant numbers of deportations. That’s true. But what you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took action to change the law.  (Applause.) So that’s point, number one.”

So it shouldn’t surprise you that Obama has said frankly warped things about peace and national security such as these gems as 200,000 human beings are murdered in Syria (after Obama’s pathetic and despicable “red line”), as Islamic State takes over Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and counting,

  • [T]he truth of the matter is that for all the challenges we face, all the problems that we have, if you had to be — if you had to choose any moment to be born in human history, not knowing what your position was going to be, who you were going to be, you’d choose this time. The world is less violent than it has ever been. It is healthier than it has ever been. It is more tolerant than it has ever been. It is better fed then it’s ever been. It is more educated than it’s ever been.”
  • Obama:  “Yes, but, David, I think the analogy we use around here sometimes, and I think is accurate, is if a JV team puts on Lakers uniforms, that doesn’t make them Kobe Bryant. I think there is a distinction between the capacity and reach of a bin Laden and a network that is actively planning major terrorist plots against the homeland versus jihadists who are engaged in various local power struggles and disputes, often sectarian.”Remnick: “But that JV team just took over Fallujah.”

This is the most pathologically dishonest president with the most pathologically dishonest administration that ever existed.

This is a president who destroyed Iraq and exposed America to the threat of a giant terrorist caliphate by a Muslim terrorist army that barely existed when Bush was president.  This is a president who falsely has tried to blame his abandonment of Iraq on some “status of agreement” treaty when it is a known damned fact of history that Obama planned to cut-and-run and abandon Iraq from the very moment he took office, if not even before then.  Just as it is a fact of history that top generals predicted YEARS AGO that Obama’s plan for Iraq would end in the very sort of disaster that it has in fact ended in.

But Barack Hussein Obama is a pathologically dishonest LIAR without shame, without honesty, without decency, without virtue and without integrity of any kind aside from the integrity of the devil to be wicked.

I mean, this is a dishonest, lying weasel who claimed that he was deporting more illegal immigrants than any president when in fact all he had done was dishonestly switch the statistic to make it artificially seem like he was doing precisely what he was not doing.  This is a criminal thug who used the IRS as his “Internal Revenge Service” to target and destroy conservative organizations and successfully disrupt their ability to prevent his 2014 re-election.

This is a man who cynically and dishonestly claimed that his would be the most transparent administration in history.  And instead – and this according to New York Times reporters who are decidedly left-leaning – that Obama is “THE greatest enemy of press freedom that we have encountered in at least a generation.”  Obama has created a Stalinist “climate of fear” among journalists.

And please don’t think for one nanosecond that this is a president or an administration who gives a flying damn about you or your family; rather, this is a reckless demagogue who is so vile that he refuses to prepare any contingency plan whatsoever if his ObamaCare is struck down by the Supreme Court as any responsible leader would do.  Rather, he’s holding the fact that he’ll ruin the country’s healthcare system like a terrorist over the Supreme Court’s head and basically letting Republicans know that he will intentionally inflict as much suffering on the American people while trying to blame them for the “fundamental transformation of the United States” that not one of them voted for if he doesn’t get his damn way.  He’ll happily destroy your health care system and blame it on somebody else.   Just as he showed that display of contempt for the American people when he imposed his above – again by his own words – “emperor’s unconstitutional and undemocratic power grab that violates the American system” – immigration amnesty this past week.  Or when he intentionally caused as much damage as he possibly could while demagoguing the future effects of the last time the Republicans tried to show some backbone and stop this “emperor” from his endless fascist tyranny.  And he pulled the same fascist scaremongering tactics this time around, too.

So now here we are, with Obama and his lying cabinet assuring us that this horrifyingly bad nuclear deal with Iran – which to obtain Obama has repeatedly violated his own promise to impose sanctions if he didn’t get aforementioned deal and now dogmatically refuses to impose any sanctions whatsoever – is great for America and great for Israel and that the three-out-of-four Israelis who believe Obama would screw them are nothing but the stupid descendants of apes and pigs.  I mean, why the hell else would three-fourths of a people understand that Obama is wrong and evil and therefore clearly on the side of evil?

I mean, why on earth wouldn’t Jews trust our current Führer when he says he won’t allow Iran to have nuclear weapons – YET.

So Obama is spurning the leader of the state of Israel and at least FIFTY Democrats are joining him in his fatwa against the Little Satan.  Because our pissy little malignant narcissist-in-chief thinks that everyone should come crawling to him for permission to do anything and that no one should have permission to oppose his plans to abandon Israel and the world to a nuclear Iran.

Democrats and their punk president are acting like junior high school students trying to bully an unpopular kid (the state of Israel).  Netanyahu wants the American people to understand the actual facts of the matter in this incredibly wicked deal; Obama and the Democrat Party want him to shut the hell up and go to the Auschwitz deal they’re preparing for him and his people with a country that has repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map.

The Bible predicted Obama nearly 3,000 years ago.  It predicted that a horrible, evil man would one day say peace, peace when there WASN’T any peace.  Jeremiah 6:14 was written just for Obama and his administration:

They offer superficial treatments for my people’s mortal wound. They give assurances of peace when there is no peace.

And the Bible pointed out that the coming Great Tribulation under the demonic world tyrant known as the beast would officially begin when Israel signed a seven-year peace covenant with the Antichrist.

And I am simply stating the FACT that Obama has been without any question THE most anti-Israel president in the entire history of America and that Israel will have no one to turn to BUT the Antichrist thanks to what Obama has done.  Obama’s treatment of Israel is shockingObama is Israel’s most dangerous enemyObama is treating Israel the way you would treat an enemy.

There was a time when Democrats bitterly complained that under Bush, we had a two front war.  That was ultimately false because Bush WON in Iraq.  But now, under Obama’s disgraceful and corrupt and wicked administration, we face a TWENTY FRONT war with a terrorist enemy that is bolder, larger, better equipped, better funded, better trained and more active than it EVER was under Bush.

Obama is arguing that he will be able to produce a treaty by which the U.S.A. will be able to micro-verify Iranian activities toward any nuclear weapons.  Pardon my language, but that is a load of bull feces; as we SPEAK, Iran is refusing to comply with previous agreements and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is publicly saying that Iran “has carried out activities that are relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device,” that Iran is continuing to “deny inspectors access to a key suspect site, it has carried out work there that the agency says will make it more difficult to determine what has been going on there, should they ever be admitted in the future.”  And the IAEA says, “The agency remains concerned about the possible existence in Iran of undisclosed nuclear related activities involving military related organizations, including activities related to the development of a nuclear payload for a missile.”  If it is possible, Iran is even less trustworthy that Obama who is a proven liar without shame.

Obama constantly plays the game of the fallacy of the false dilemma, in this case saying we must either follow his plan to the letter or else the only other possible alternative is total war with Iran.  Which is total baloney, given the fact that before Obama decided to pretend to keep Iran from getting nukes while in fact assuring that they would get their nukes after he leaves office, we had incredibly painful sanctions that were punishingly effective.  Which Obama swears by Allah’s beard he will veto if anyone tries to reinstitute themAfter repeatedly refusing to hold up his word to impose sanctions if no deal came through and instead extending the talks for months and even years on end.  Meanwhile, free of the crippling sanctions, Iran’s economy has rebounded and they are ready for some jihad.  Furthermore, we don’t need to go to war; we could just release Israel and organize flyover rights for their world class air force.

But like I keep saying: Obama is a LIAR.

And now – based on lies as everything this liar has ever did has been – Obama has a deal with Iran that is defeat on steroids.

Barack Hussein Obama hates Israel.  The Democrat Party is now proving that it too hates Israel.

I believe that we are in the last days.  I believe that when Obama’s reverend for 22 years screamed, “No, no, no!  NOT God bless America!  God DAMN America!” that he spoke as a prophet.  And this has become a nation under God’s curse because of an incredibly wicked man’s incredibly wicked policy against God’s people Israel.

 

Liberal Democrat Message: Americans Who Oppose Sharia Law Being Imposed On Them Are Bigots

February 16, 2015

Let me just start with an entirely separate incident to frame this story about the wickedness, dishonesty and vileness of liberals and liberalism before I move on to the elected Democrat official’s being wicked, dishonest and vile.

We just had a shooting homicide of three young Muslim students at Chapel Hill.  Let’s see who the shooter is:

Mr. Hicks appeared to have a deep dislike of all religion. On his Facebook page, nearly all of his posts expressed support for atheism, criticism of Christian conservatives or both.

Last month, he posted a photograph that said, “Praying is pointless, useless, narcissistic, arrogant, and lazy; just like the imaginary god you pray to.”

Mr. Hicks’s wife, Karen, insisted at a news conference that her husband was not a bigot. “I can say with absolute belief that this incident had nothing to do with religion or the victims’ faith, but it was related to a longstanding parking dispute that my husband had with the neighbors,” she said.

His wife also pointed out his support for gay rights and the right to abortion.

[Video] Wife Says Gunman Believed in Equality

Karen Hicks, the wife of Craig Stephen Hicks, who is accused of murdering three Muslim students, said he championed individuals’ rights on his Facebook page and believed everyone was equal.

Okay, so the shooter is a rabid atheist who hates conservatives and Christians and is a rabid supporter of abortion and homosexual marriage.  I know what you’re thinking: if this clown doesn’t spend all day getting his worldview fed to him by Fox News, then I’m the world’s greatest athlete.

Oh, you’re not thinking that because that would be idiotic, given that Fox News if anything presents the very opposite of this turd?

Well, that doesn’t stop the left from framing Fox News for the work of one of their own fascist slimeballs.  I actually saw the coverage on MSNBC blaming Fox News, but here’s the work of CNN doing it:

Shafi Khan, a self-described friend of the Muslim students shot dead Tuesday in North Carolina, specifically blamed Fox News, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and Oklahoma state Rep. John Bennett for what he called the “dehumanization of Muslims.”

“Speaking as an American Muslim, I can tell you that we can’t deny there’s a sentiment in the community that we feel that we were being targeted for our faith,” Mr. Khan, a North Carolina native who co-founded United Muslim Relief, told CNN. “There is certain sections of the media and political apparatus that are constantly dehumanizing Muslims. And I want to take a minute and ask people like Fox News and Bobby Jindal to stop the dehumanization of Muslims. It’s really, really starting to take a toll.”

Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, was arrested and charged with three counts of first-degree murder after turning himself in to Chapel Hill authorities for the shooting deaths of Deah Shaddy Barakat, 23, his wife, Yusor Mohammad, 21, and her sister, Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19.

Apart from the fact that the leftist press is trying to blame the ONE network we can safely assume atheist abortion loving sodomy worshiper Craig Hicks DID NOT watch, what else do we have?  Of course we’ve got these rabid liberals screaming to take away our guns, but who are the murderous whackjobs that kill with guns?  The very liberals who want to take them away.  Which is another way of pointing out the fact that “liberal” or “Democrat” is a synonym for “liar” and “hypocrite without shame, honor or decency.”

We live in an age when our journalists from the very top level down are simply nothing more than documented liars.  Truth is virtually impossible in this climate.

But we have a liar-in-chief as the leader of the free world.

Obama has repeatedly argued that Islam has nothing to do with the scourge of terrorism that has exploded under his presidency:

I have made it clear that America will not base our entire foreign policy on reacting to terrorism. Rather, we have waged a focused campaign against al Qaeda and its associated forces – taking out their leaders, and denying them the safe-havens they rely upon. At the same time, we have reaffirmed that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. Islam teaches peace. Muslims the world over aspire to live with dignity and a sense of justice. And when it comes to America and Islam, there is no us and them – there is only us, because millions of Muslim Americans are part of the fabric of our country.

And yet Barack Obama just went on national television and basically said that there is a moral equivalence between what Muslim terrorists are doing RIGHT NOW TODAY and what Christians allegedly did A THOUSAND DAMN YEARS AGO in the Medieval world as a response to Muslims attacking one of their own Christian empires:

Obama spotlights ‘terrible deeds in the name of Christ’ during Crusades
By Douglas Ernst  – The Washington Times – Thursday, February 5, 2015

President Obama used the annual National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday to draw those in attendance to the “terrible deeds” committed “in the name of Christ.”

While speaking at the Washington event, Mr. Obama had harsh words for the Islamic State group, but he also put a spotlight on the Crusades.

“Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” Mr. Obama said.
 SEE ALSO: Obama equates Islamic terrorism with ‘terrible deeds’ committed by Christians
The president added that members of the Sunni radical terror group are part of  “brutal vicious death cult that in the name of religion carries out unspeakable acts of barbarism.”

The president’s speech came just days after Jordanian pilot Moaz al-Kassasbeh was burned alive by the Islamic State group. The member of the U.S.-led coalition had been held prisoner since December after his F-16 crashed.

So we catch Obama in the act of blaming religion in general and then specifically trying to create a false moral equivalence and point his finger at Christians while shielding the religion of Islam that is actually responsible for 99.999% of violent acts of terror today.  You know, excluding the ones that atheists are responsible for.

The problem is that atheism is itself a religious worldview with all the defining characteristics of a religious worldview.  The problem is that atheism is responsible for more brutal murders in the last century than every other religious worldview in all of history (even including psycho Islam) has ever been COMBINED.  And the problem is that Christianity – to the extent that it actually needed to do so – reformed hundreds of years ago and why in the HELL are liberals and Democrats doing everything they can to prevent Islam from needing to reform itself the same way as they constantly try to say that terrorism committed by Muslims in the name of Allah and Islam have nothing to do with Muslims, Allah or Islam???

G.K. Chesterton stated the fact that:

Lenin said that religion is the opium of the people… [But] it is only by believing in God that we can ever criticize the Government. Once abolish the God, and the Government becomes the God. That fact is written all across human history; but it is written most plainly across that recent history of Russia; which was created by Lenin…Lenin only fell into a slight error: he only got it the wrong way round. The truth is that irreligion is the opium of the people. Wherever the people do not believe in something beyond the world, they will worship the world.

What has happened is that socialist – by which I mean a hybrid of fascist and communist – liberal Democrats such as Barack Obama have done everything they can to replace God with The State.  And apart from God – and specifically the God of the Bible – The State is beyond question.  It’s motives are simply “truth” because there is no greater power and no greater “truth” than Government left.

Radical Muslims and radical liberals want the same thing: the State elevated to the power of Deity and having complete control over our lives and our liberties and our freedom.  They both have the exact same end and the only difference is the means to that end.  And liberals such as Barack Obama and Maxine Waters believe that they can either negotiate with or appease radical Islam.

So with that setup that occurred after I had basically written the following, let me get to the story I initially intended to write about.

Rep. Maxine Waters, a multi-term elected Democrat in good standing, believes that if you don’t like sharia law, you are a bigot and you need to have your freedoms crushed.

She’s hardly the only Democrat holding this position: in her most recent appearance where she claims that any opposition to sharia law amounts to racism and bigotry, she cited a host of Democrats who were there with her supporting this insanity including Rep. Loretta Sanchez, Rep. Judy Chu, California State Controller John Chiang, among others.

Here she is:

And you can see that this is hardly out of character with this member of the Democrat Party.

The only refreshing thing here is that at least Maxine Waters is saying what Barack Hussein Obama clearly believes.

It is AMAZING how profoundly deceived and how frankly demon-possessed Democrats are today.  Islam is THE most oppressive force on the planet today.  There has NEVER been a democracy arise within Islam and there never WILL be an Islamic democracy that arises within Islam because of the facts about Islam as revealed in the great book, The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion (which is entirely available for FREE at the link as a PDF document).  Or you can buy your own copy.

Islam murders homosexuals.  Islam forces women into a life of ignorance where they walk around as living tents with only the slits of their eyes exposed if they don’t have to veil those, too.  Islam enslaves blacks in numbers as great as anything Democrats – yes, DEMOCRATS – in America did when Lincoln and his fellow Republicans went to war to defeat the aforementioned Democrats to abolish slavery.

And yet these demon-possessed people, these DEMOn-possessed-bureauCRATS, have only hostility and slander for Christianity and for Christ.

We’ve seen that radical hate masqueraded as “tolerance” in Obama.  We’re seeing it in public schools as children are being forced to pray Islamic prayers after their right to pray Christian prayers were eradicated BY THE VERY SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE FORCING CHILDREN TO PRAY MUSLIM PRAYERS.

Barack Obama has a profoundly disturbing connection with radical Islam and with radical Muslims.

Consider ten statements by Obama for Islam:

10 Quotes By Barack Obama About Islam
#1 “Islam has always been part of America”
#2 “we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities”
#3 “These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.”
#4 “America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.”
#5 “So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed”
#6 “Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity and racial equality”
#7 “As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.”
#8 “I look forward to hosting an Iftar dinner celebrating Ramadan here at the White House later this week, and wish you a blessed month.”
#9 “That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”
#10 “I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”

And now consider by way of contrast ten statements by Obama condemning and undermining Christianity:

#1 Ten interesting quotes by Obama regarding Christianity: 
1 “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation”
2 “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation.”
3 “Which passages of scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is an abomination? Or we could go with Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith?”
4 “Even those who claim the Bible’s inerrancy make distinctions between Scriptural edicts, sensing that some passages – the Ten Commandments, say, or a belief in Christ’s divinity – are central to Christian faith, while others are more culturally specific and may be modified to accommodate modern life.”
5 “The American people intuitively understand this, which is why the majority of Catholics practice birth control and some of those opposed to gay marriage nevertheless are opposed to a Constitutional amendment to ban it. Religious leadership need not accept such wisdom in counseling their flocks, but they should recognize this wisdom in their politics.”
6 From Obama’s book, The Audacity of Hope: “I am not willing to have the state deny American citizens a civil union that confers equivalent rights on such basic matters as hospital visitation or health insurance coverage simply because the people they love are of the same sex—nor am I willing to accept a reading of the Bible that considers an obscure line in Romans to be more defining of Christianity than the Sermon on the Mount.”
7 “I find it hard to believe that my God would consign four-fifths of the world to hell. I can’t imagine that my God would allow some little Hindu kid in India who never interacts with the Christian faith to somehow burn for all eternity. That’s just not part of my religious makeup.”
8 “Those opposed to abortion cannot simply invoke God’s will–they have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths.”
9 On his support for civil unions for gay couples: “If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount.”
10 “I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.”

For the factual record to correct this Liar-in–Chief of ours regarding statement 6 above, there is NOTHING in the Sermon of the Mount that recognizes or affirms homosexuality in any way, shape or form.  Nor is there ANYTHING “obscure” when it comes to the condemnation of homosexuality as not only sinful but the very last straw that brings the wrath of God upon any society who embraces homosexuality.  Please read it for yourself.  And in reference to Obama’s statement 7, JESUS SPOKE MORE ABOUT THE REALITY OF HELL THAN ANYONE IN THE WHOLE BIBLE AND NEARLY MORE THAN EVERYONE IN THE BIBLE COMBINEDHell is a reality.  The very Book of Romans that Obama so trivializes and demonizes teaches that Jesus died for us so that we don’t have to spend eternity in the very real hell that Barack Obama foolishly mocks.  Please don’t believe what your lying Fool-in-Chief claims if you have any value on your own soul or the souls of your children.

Barack Obama has NO part in true Christianity.  NONE whatsoever.  Whether you want to talk about the nature of the biblical/Christian doctrine of original sin versus Obama’s belief in “the irrepressible force of human goodness or whether you want to talk about Obama’s profoundly unbiblical concept of “collective salvation“, Barack Obama has absolutely NO part in the Christianity that he falsely claims and routinely perverts.  And anyone who believes Obama’s lies is going to one day burn in the very hell that Obama denies and Jesus came and violently died to save us from.

And once you’ve “fundamentally transformed” Christianity – just as Jesus prophesied in Matthew 24:5 and 11 that false messiahs would do in His name – you can of course pervert it into a religion that embraces homosexuality and abortion and government-imposed socialism and illegal immigration that Obama has led America into embracing.

We just had leftists try to impose the Muslim call to prayer from the Christian chapel of a university that was ordained and commissioned as an institution of the Christian Gospel by Methodists.  And yet the insane news coverage by these damned dishonest “journalists” decries the university backing down amid the ensuing outcry as a “victory for American intolerance.”  Yet where are these same cowards in Islamic countries where the similar situation of the Lord’s Prayer being broadcast from a Muslim mosque would be met with rabid violence???

Similarly, in spite of the fact that Islamic State had just burned a human being they’d put in a cage ALIVE, leftist university students in a notoriously leftist university were heard chanting the terrorist call “Allahu Akbar!” after they’d voted to demonize Jews.

And public schools under Obama have become sewers of Islam as students are forced to recite that “Allah is Greater!” in school exercises.

The left very clearly has an agenda from the very heart of the devil.  Incredibly, stunningly, they are actually embracing radical Islam even as it is revealing itself as the ugliest worldview since Nazism.  There is simply no question progressive liberalism as a movement is doing this; the only question is, why on earth are they doing something that flies in the face of their stated principles???

I have pointed out the reasons for that hatred by Democrats – who want a holocaust of murdered babies, the institution of homosexual sodomy and the exaltation of the State in place of belief in God, His Word and His Ways – as they impose ANYTHING but Christ and Christianity upon society and as they fight to ensure the defeat of the America that our founding fathers fought to create and Lincoln fought to preserve.  I documented three reasons why liberal Democrats insanely and hypocritically defend and protect Islam even as they attack and undermine Christianity.  The first is found in the words of Jesus about Christians and Christianity:

“If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you.   If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you.  Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A slave is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you; if they kept My word, they will keep yours also.  But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know the One who sent Me.”  — John 15:18-21

Democrats hate Christians and despise Christianity because they hate Jesus.  It is as simple as that and Jesus told us it would happen and why it would happen.  And so while you would think that liberals would oppose the hate and intolerance of Islam that pisses in the eye of all their views as it murders homosexuals and tortures women, they embrace it simply because it’s better to them than the Jesus they hate with every fiber of their being.

The second reason is the stunning and frankly Luciferian arrogance of atheism and secular humanism.  Liberals truly don’t believe that ANYONE actually believes in God.  They believe that everyone has to ultimately think just like they do; and the unwashed masses who “cling to their religion” are just too stupid as herd animals to realize it.  And so they believe with Marx that religion is merely an opiate for the masses – notwithstanding that Chesterton pointed out that in their prideful wickedness they actually got that ass-backwards – and that their economic socialism will turn the radical Muslims – whom of course they insanely repeatedly tell us have nothing to do with either Islam or even religion – to their view through some Obama process of appeasement and negotiation. And the third reason liberals defend jihadist Muslims is that Muslims actually ultimately want to have a government – just like progressive liberalism – a government that has all the power and prerogatives of God or Allah.  And progressive liberals don’t really care what the means is to total government power as long as they have the end of total government power.  Because they arrogantly and foolishly believe they will ultimately get their secular humanist way.

And so here we are, with Democrats insanely arguing that if we don’t like the sharia law that is increasingly going to be stuffed down our throats, it’s only because we’re “bigots.”

Even if women have to dress like the picture I provide in this article in order to practice progressive liberal “tolerance.”

And then there is the Word of God that these wicked, morally perverted liberals with all of their wicked and morally-perverted “-isms” despise:

Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ. – Colossians 2:8 NLT

We are human, but we don’t wage war as humans do. We use God’s mighty weapons, not worldly weapons, to knock down the strongholds of human reasoning and to destroy false arguments. We destroy every proud obstacle that keeps people from knowing God. We capture their rebellious thoughts and teach them to obey Christ. – 2 Corinthians 10:3-5 NLT

You don’t have very much time left before Barack Hussein Obama, his Democrat Party and his “fundamentally transformed” America bring about the Antichrist prophesied in the Holy Bible who will impose a system of total government domination over the economy and over society –

He required everyone–small and great, rich and poor, free and slave–to be given a mark on the right hand or on the forehead.  And no one could buy or sell anything without that mark, which was either the name of the beast or the number representing his name.  Wisdom is needed here. Let the one with understanding solve the meaning of the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666. — Revelation 13:16-18

– just as these wicked Democrats have been working to impose for decades: a government system that has total power over us and has the power to force us to do what they want.

The beast is coming. Americans voted for it and then they re-elected it. And now it is close at hand.

Obama’s Latest: Americans Have No Right To Complain About My Fascist Dictator Policies Because My Country Is GONE

November 26, 2014

Here’s the latest Obama outrage.  Well, scratch that.  Given this evil man’s pathological wickedness, I have no doubt that two seconds later he provided an even worse one.  But here is yet another Obama outrage against everything this nation has ever stood for:

Obama: Americans Have No Right To Favor Americans
10:01 PM 11/25/2014
Neil Munro, White House Correspondent

The only Americans who can legitimately object to immigration are native Indian-Americans, President Barack Obama told his Chicago audience Nov. 24, as he made an impassioned ideological plea for endless immigration, cultural diversity and a big government to manage the resulting multicultural society.

“There have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, ‘Well, I don’t want those folks,’ even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans,” Obama said, rhetorically dismissing the right of 300 million actual Americans to decide who can live in their homeland.

Americans should not favor other Americans over foreigners, Obama demanded. “Sometimes we get attached to our particular tribe, our particular race, our particular religion, and then we start treating other folks differently… that, sometimes, has been a bottleneck to how we think about immigration,” he said in the face of many polls showing rising opposition to his immigration agenda.

Obama denied any moral or practical distinction between native-born Americans and future migrants. “Whether we cross the Atlantic, or the Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we all shared one thing, and that’s the hope that America would be the place where we could believe as we choose… and that the law would be enforced equally for everybody, regardless of what you look like or what your last name was,” said the president….]

As always, of course, Obama speaks dishonestly, deceitfully, demagogically in warped and perverted argument that frames his opposition as being as hateful as his demonic imagination allows.  “I don’t want those folks,” Obama says of people like me.  BULLCRAP.  Rather, “I don’t want ANY folks flooding into this country ILLEGALLY AND IN VIOLATION OF OUR LAWS.”  But Obama would have a hard time slandering me if he told the truth about how I really feel, wouldn’t he???

Second, let me ask a simple question in defiance of Obama’s dishonest narratives: if I am not a “Native-American,” THEN I DEMAND LIBERALS TELL ME WHERE THE HELL AM I A NATIVE OF???

I was born in Gardena, California.  My mother was born on a farm in Lone Tree, Iowa and my father was born in Oakland, Iowa.  My Grandma on my dad’s side was a member of Daughters of the American Revolution.  But according to the demon-possessed denial of reality coming out of Democrat Party propaganda, none of us qualify as “Native-Americans” and none of us have a right to complain about Obama being more like a Führer than a president.

There are 300-plus million Americans who just learned that their “president” says their will doesn’t matter any more, but that we should get over our being “American” – or at least Obama’s “fundamentally transformed” version of an “American” – and accept our false messiah’s premise that anyone who wants to come here, no matter how illegally, is every bit as “American” as anyone else.  With the sole possible exception being the pure-lineage ancestors of the Indians who greeted the Mayflower.

The American people just learned that they don’t count in Obama’s demonic calculus.

Just before the November elections, Obama decreed, “Make no mistake, my policies are on the ballot.”

And they were.  I mean, had Democrats won, Obama would have boasted that his policies had been approved by the American people and ratified by the election.

Obama once assured us that “elections have consequences,” but that was when Obama could say, “I won.”  But like his opposition that turned to support for gay marriage and like his opposition that turned to support for amnesty for illegal immigrants and like his opposition against issuing a tyrant-like executive order that turned to support for acting as he had previously said would make him a king or an emperor – with both “opposition” and “support” being purely political calculations by this cynical moral monster –  elections should no longer have consequences.  Because Obama lost.

Fascists, for the record, have no respect for elections or democracy or anything but what their power can dictate.

And so Obama the fascist only heard the voices of the two-thirds who DIDN’T vote.  Because in not voting at all their “vote” was all that mattered to Obama.  And to hell with the Americans who stupidly believed that this was still a constitutional democratic republic and bothered to cast a ballot.

Anyway, elections no longer have consequences anymore.  Because Obama lost this time and it’s really just all about the Nazi-in-Chief, now, silly goose.

I suppose Obama is right, in his demon-possessed way: I WAS a “Native-American,” all right.  Because I was born in the United States of America and native to the land of the free and the home of the brave.

But that land has been taken away and the brave are as the buffalo that once filled the land but are now a distant memory.

And now I find that I’m a “native” of nowhere.

Because the beast is coming.

Democrat women sacrificed more than sixty million of their own babies on their demonic altar of abortion; Democrat men have as an act of demonic cult worship bent over as male prostitutes to accept the sodomy of homosexual perversion.  And thus have Democrats paved the way for the Antichrist.

Democrats have forced America into a bet: that there is no God, that Romans chapter one is a lie.  Because if they are wrong, Democrats have consigned America to burn in hell.

I compare Obama’s America – it isn’t “the United States of America” any more, because Obama has fundamentally divided us and most of the states are now GOP strongholds that bitterly oppose his fascist tyranny, and as for the “America” part, well, just look above – to the Japanese battleship the Yamato.  As America is the most powerful nation that ever existed, the Yamato, with its 18.1″ guns, is the most powerful warship that ever existed.  But like the Yamato on its final voyage to its destruction, America is running out of fuel, like the Yamato, its ultimate destination is suicide.  And like the Yamato, this perverted “America” will be utterly destroyed on all sides even as it collapses from within.  But because of the moral stench of Obama and because of the wickedness of the party that broke this nation from “One nation, under God,” we have become a nation that is 50-percent-plus-one wicked.  And because of our wickedness this “God damn America!” will go down and sink so hard and so fast and with so much suffering it will be worse than any nightmare.  Because just like the Japanese fascists on the Yamato who worshiped their emperor as god, Democrats are fascists who will worship the coming Antichrist and take his mark on their right hands or on their foreheads.

So I suppose that God has allowed Democrats to shove me out of the country of my birth to prepare me for the one place that I am still a fully valid citizen of: Heaven.

So Maranatha, Lord Jesus.  Democrats have Obama and their Antichrist to come, and the rest of us have You.  And I want to go with You and leave this land I just found out I was not even a “native” of to the fate decreed in the Book of Revelation.

Obama’s Fascist Executive Order Reveals That The Spirit Of Antichrist Is In America Right Now

November 20, 2014

Obama, liberals and Democrats never cease to boggle my mind with their fascist evil.

Think about it: you live in a country with some 330 million people.  We have a man who has said over and over and over again that it would be illegal, unconstitutional, undemocratic and a violation of the law for him to do what he is now saying he is going to do in spite of his own words that it would be immoral and harmful.  And no one can do anything about it.

That is the heart of a world with Antichrist.

When the beast comes, the same exact evil spirit that moves the wicked heart of Obama will move the heart of the coming Antichrist.

Here are 22 specific statements by Barack Obama that what he is now about to do is EVIL:

  1. “I take the Constitution very seriously. The biggest problems that we’re facing right now have to do with [the president] trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all. And that’s what I intend to reverse when I’m President of the United States of America.” (3/31/08)
  2. “We’ve got a government designed by the Founders so that there’d be checks and balances. You don’t want a president who’s too powerful or a Congress that’s too powerful or a court that’s too powerful. Everybody’s got their own role. Congress’s job is to pass legislation. The president can veto it or he can sign it. … I believe in the Constitution and I will obey the Constitution of the United States. We’re not going to use signing statements as a way of doing an end-run around Congress.” (5/19/08)
  3. “Comprehensive reform, that’s how we’re going to solve this problem. … Anybody who tells you it’s going to be easy or that I can wave a magic wand and make it happen hasn’t been paying attention to how this town works.” (5/5/10)
  4. “[T]here are those in the immigrants’ rights community who have argued passionately that we should simply provide those who are [here] illegally with legal status, or at least ignore the laws on the books and put an end to deportation until we have better laws. … I believe such an indiscriminate approach would be both unwise and unfair. It would suggest to those thinking about coming here illegally that there will be no repercussions for such a decision. And this could lead to a surge in more illegal immigration. And it would also ignore the millions of people around the world who are waiting in line to come here legally. Ultimately, our nation, like all nations, has the right and obligation to control its borders and set laws for residency and citizenship.  And no matter how decent they are, no matter their reasons, the 11 million who broke these laws should be held accountable.” (7/1/10)
  5. “I do have an obligation to make sure that I am following some of the rules. I can’t simply ignore laws that are out there. I’ve got to work to make sure that they are changed.” (10/14/10)
  6. I am president, I am not king. I can’t do these things just by myself. We have a system of government that requires the Congress to work with the Executive Branch to make it happen. I’m committed to making it happen, but I’ve got to have some partners to do it. … The main thing we have to do to stop deportations is to change the laws. … [T]he most important thing that we can do is to change the law because the way the system works – again, I just want to repeat, I’m president, I’m not king. If Congress has laws on the books that says that people who are here who are not documented have to be deported, then I can exercise some flexibility in terms of where we deploy our resources, to focus on people who are really causing problems as a opposed to families who are just trying to work and support themselves. But there’s a limit to the discretion that I can show because I am obliged to execute the law. That’s what the Executive Branch means. I can’t just make the laws up by myself. So the most important thing that we can do is focus on changing the underlying laws.” (10/25/10)
  7. “America is a nation of laws, which means I, as the President, am obligated to enforce the law. I don’t have a choice about that. That’s part of my job. But I can advocate for changes in the law so that we have a country that is both respectful of the law but also continues to be a great nation of immigrants. … With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed …. [W]e’ve got three branches of government. Congress passes the law. The executive branch’s job is to enforce and implement those laws. And then the judiciary has to interpret the laws. There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply through executive order ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as President.” (3/28/11)
  8. “I can’t solve this problem by myself. … [W]e’re going to have to have bipartisan support in order to make it happen. … I can’t do it by myself. We’re going to have to change the laws in Congress, but I’m confident we can make it happen.” (4/20/11)
  9. “I know some here wish that I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself.  But that’s not how democracy works.  See, democracy is hard.  But it’s right. Changing our laws means doing the hard work of changing minds and changing votes, one by one.” (4/29/11)
  10. “Sometimes when I talk to immigration advocates, they wish I could just bypass Congress and change the law myself. But that’s not how a democracy works. What we really need to do is to keep up the fight to pass genuine, comprehensive reform. That is the ultimate solution to this problem. That’s what I’m committed to doing.” (5/10/11)
  11. “I swore an oath to uphold the laws on the books …. Now, I know some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own. Believe me, the idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you. Not just on immigration reform. But that’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.” (7/25/11)
  12. “So what we’ve tried to do is within the constraints of the laws on the books, we’ve tried to be as fair, humane, just as we can, recognizing, though, that the laws themselves need to be changed. … The most important thing for your viewers and listeners and readers to understand is that in order to change our laws, we’ve got to get it through the House of Representatives, which is currently controlled by Republicans, and we’ve got to get 60 votes in the Senate. … Administratively, we can’t ignore the law. … I just have to continue to say this notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true.  We are doing everything we can administratively.  But the fact of the matter is there are laws on the books that I have to enforce.  And I think there’s been a great disservice done to the cause of getting the DREAM Act passed and getting comprehensive immigration passed by perpetrating the notion that somehow, by myself, I can go and do these things.  It’s just not true. … We live in a democracy.  You have to pass bills through the legislature, and then I can sign it.  And if all the attention is focused away from the legislative process, then that is going to lead to a constant dead-end. We have to recognize how the system works, and then apply pressure to those places where votes can be gotten and, ultimately, we can get this thing solved.” (9/28/11)

In June 2012, President Obama unilaterally granted deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA), allowing “eligible individuals who do not present a risk to national security or public safety … to request temporary relief from deportation proceedings and apply for work authorization.” He then argued that he had already done everything he could legally do on his own:

  1. “Now, what I’ve always said is, as the head of the executive branch, there’s a limit to what I can do. Part of the reason that deportations went up was Congress put a whole lot of money into it, and when you have a lot of resources and a lot more agents involved, then there are going to be higher numbers. What we’ve said is, let’s make sure that you’re not misdirecting those resources. But we’re still going to, ultimately, have to change the laws in order to avoid some of the heartbreaking stories that you see coming up occasionally. And that’s why this continues to be a top priority of mine. … And we will continue to make sure that how we enforce is done as fairly and justly as possible. But until we have a law in place that provides a pathway for legalization and/or citizenship for the folks in question, we’re going to continue to be bound by the law. … And so part of the challenge as President is constantly saying, ‘what authorities do I have?’” (9/20/12)
  2. “We are a nation of immigrants. … But we’re also a nation of laws. So what I’ve said is, we need to fix a broken immigration system. And I’ve done everything that I can on my own[.]” (10/16/12)
  3. I’m not a king. I am the head of the executive branch of government. I’m required to follow the law. And that’s what we’ve done. But what I’ve also said is, let’s make sure that we’re applying the law in a way that takes into account people’s humanity. That’s the reason that we moved forward on deferred action. Within the confines of the law we said, we have some discretion in terms of how we apply this law.” (1/30/13)
  4. I’m not a king. You know, my job as the head of the executive branch ultimately is to carry out the law.  And, you know, when it comes to enforcement of our immigration laws, we’ve got some discretion. We can prioritize what we do. But we can’t simply ignore the law. When it comes to the dreamers, we were able to identify that group and say, ‘These folks are generally not a risk. They’re not involved in crime. … And so let’s prioritize our enforcement resources.’ But to sort through all the possible cases of everybody who might have a sympathetic story to tell is very difficult to do. This is why we need comprehensive immigration reform. To make sure that once and for all, in a way that is, you know, ratified by Congress, we can say that there is a pathway to citizenship for people who are staying out of trouble, who are trying to do the right thing, who’ve put down roots here. … My job is to carry out the law. And so Congress gives us a whole bunch of resources. They give us an order that we’ve got to go out there and enforce the laws that are on the books.  … If this was an issue that I could do unilaterally I would have done it a long time ago. … The way our system works is Congress has to pass legislation. I then get an opportunity to sign it and implement it.” (1/30/13)
  5. “This is something I’ve struggled with throughout my presidency. The problem is that I’m the president of the United States, I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed. And Congress right now has not changed what I consider to be a broken immigration system. And what that means is that we have certain obligations to enforce the laws that are in place even if we think that in many cases the results may be tragic.” (2/14/13)
  6. “I think that it is very important for us to recognize that the way to solve this problem has to be legislative. I can do some things and have done some things that make a difference in the lives of people by determining how our enforcement should focus. … And we’ve been able to provide help through deferred action for young people …. But this is a problem that needs to be fixed legislatively.” (7/16/13)
  7. My job in the executive branch is supposed to be to carry out the laws that are passed. Congress has said ‘here is the law’ when it comes to those who are undocumented, and they’ve allocated a whole bunch of money for enforcement. And, what I have been able to do is to make a legal argument that I think is absolutely right, which is that given the resources that we have, we can’t do everything that Congress has asked us to do. What we can do is then carve out the DREAM Act folks, saying young people who have basically grown up here are Americans that we should welcome. … But if we start broadening that, then essentially I would be ignoring the law in a way that I think would be very difficult to defend legally. So that’s not an option. … What I’ve said is there is a there’s a path to get this done, and that’s through Congress.” (9/17/13)
  8. [I]f, in fact, I could solve all these problems without passing laws in Congress, then I would do so. But we’re also a nation of laws. That’s part of our tradition. And so the easy way out is to try to yell and pretend like I can do something by violating our laws. And what I’m proposing is the harder path, which is to use our democratic processes to achieve the same goal that you want to achieve. … It is not simply a matter of us just saying we’re going to violate the law. That’s not our tradition. The great thing about this country is we have this wonderful process of democracy, and sometimes it is messy, and sometimes it is hard, but ultimately, justice and truth win out.” (11/25/13)
  9. “I am the Champion-in-Chief of comprehensive immigration reform. But what I’ve said in the past remains true, which is until Congress passes a new law, then I am constrained in terms of what I am able to do. What I’ve done is to use my prosecutorial discretion, because you can’t enforce the laws across the board for 11 or 12 million people, there aren’t the resources there.  What we’ve said is focus on folks who are engaged in criminal activity, focus on people who are engaged in gang activity. Do not focus on young people, who we’re calling DREAMers …. That already stretched my administrative capacity very far. But I was confident that that was the right thing to do. But at a certain point the reason that these deportations are taking place is, Congress said, ‘you have to enforce these laws.’ They fund the hiring of officials at the department that’s charged with enforcing.  And I cannot ignore those laws any more than I could ignore, you know, any of the other laws that are on the books. That’s why it’s so important for us to get comprehensive immigration reform done this year.” (3/6/14)
  10. “I think that I never have a green light [to push the limits of executive power].  I’m bound by the Constitution; I’m bound by separation of powers.  There are some things we can’t do. Congress has the power of the purse, for example. … Congress has to pass a budget and authorize spending. So I don’t have a green light. … My preference in all these instances is to work with Congress, because not only can Congress do more, but it’s going to be longer-lasting.” (8/6/14)

– See more at: http://www.speaker.gov/general/22-times-president-obama-said-he-couldn-t-ignore-or-create-his-own-immigration-law#sthash.fNRIi14a.dpuf

The Republican Party ought to state reality this way:

Barack Obama is a liar who can claim whatever the hell he wants to.  But what he is really imposing is a suspension of ANY possibility of ANY pathway to citizenship until he has been driven out of office by an enraged people who will NOT suffer an emperor to rule over them as a tyrant king.

The Hispanic people should know that the truth is that ANY support for Barack Obama means OPPOSITION to any pathway for citizenship.

Barack Obama is a king and an emperor.  And he is those things in his very own words according to what he himself said about the actions he is now about to take.

What Obama is about to do he himself said would be unwise and unfair and clearly detrimental to America:

Obama: “For example, there are those in the immigrants’ rights community who have argued passionately that we should simply provide those who are [here] illegally with legal status, or at least ignore the laws on the books and put an end to deportation until we have better laws. And often this argument is framed in moral terms: Why should we punish people who are just trying to earn a living? I recognize the sense of compassion that drives this argument, but I believe such an indiscriminate approach would be both unwise and unfair. It would suggest to those thinking about coming here illegally that there will be no repercussions for such a decision. And this could lead to a surge in more illegal immigration. And it would also ignore the millions of people around the world who are waiting in line to come here legally.”

Barack Obama should be impeached.  And the star witness at his impeachment trial should be Barack Obama as his own words prove over and over and over again that he is not fit to lead in a constitutional republic.

The United States of America dies tonight.  And the sort of fascist regime that was birthed when Adolf Hitler used his “legal power” to suspend the rule of law after the Reichstag fire will be born in the moment that Obama does what he says he will do tonight.  That’s the “murky, uncharted territory” that the Washington Post warns about.

The next president will be a god-king emperor just like this one because Obama has “fundamentally transformed America” into genuine fascism.