Archive for the ‘War’ Category

The Now Beyond Sick, Ignorant And Evil Joke That Obama And Clinton Have Done Anything But Massively FAIL Against Terrorism

June 16, 2016

The way Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton frame the narrative, we cannot dare go back to the terrible days before Obama when the world was aflame with terrorism.  Barack Obama has succeeded magnificently in staunching terrorism and dragging the world from the precipice of destruction from Bush.  These fools will tell us that if we try to in any way, shape or form blame Islam for terrorist violence, or if we even have a Gitmo to keep terrorists prisoner and interrogate them, that we are to blame for the terrorist crisis because we inflamed the radicals and gave them a recruiting tool.

But let’s take a moment to examine their claims and see how utterly fallacious they truly are:

Today the word “bloodbath” is a properly descriptive term for Iraq, the nation Bush delivered from first Saddam Hussein and then al Qaeda in Iraq.  We go back to the past and we see what the world Bush handed to Obama was like even according to Obama himself and his Vice President Joe Biden: Obama boasted in February 2009, “This strategy is grounded in a clear and achievable goal shared by the Iraqi people and the American people: an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.”  And Joe Biden was even more clear in his boasting about the “victory” we had won in Iraq: “I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration.

What was the root cause of all that “optimism”:

“By the end of 2008 and in the beginning of 2009, President Bush’s surge strategy, led by General Petraeus and General Odierno, now the Chief of Staff of the Army, defeated the al-Qaeda in Iraq.  I saw the transmissions because I was advising Petraeus on the ground in Iraq.  They showed me the transmissions from al-Qaeda that they were intercepting.  They said: “We are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.”  So we knew how to deal with this enemy in that category.” General Jack Keane, one of the architects of the successful surge strategy that caused the defeat of al Qaeda in Iraq

But something happened that turned victory into defeat and led to the bloodbath rather than the optimistic “great achievement” of a “sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq.”  And that something was the incredibly foolish and frankly evil policies of one Barack Hussein Obama:

US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.

Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”

Petraeus, Gates and Odierno had hoped to sell Obama on a plan that they formulated in the final months of the Bush administration that aimed at getting around a key provision of the U.S.-Iraqi withdrawal agreement signed envisioned re-categorising large numbers of combat troops as support troops. That subterfuge was by the United States last November while ostensibly allowing Obama to deliver on his campaign promise.

Gates and Mullen had discussed the relabeling scheme with Obama as part of the Petraeus-Odierno plan for withdrawal they had presented to him in mid-December, according to a Dec. 18 New York Times story. […]

Petraeus made the mistake of not realizing that Barack Obama was an unmitigated FOOL unlike Bush, who listened to his generals’ recommendations.  That’s the bottom line.

Every single general was absolutely and fundamentally and profoundly opposed to Obama’s cut-and-run policy and knew it would amount to a return of the very war we had WON with American blood and treasure.  But Obama did it anyway.  And NO, it had NOTHING to do with the “status of forces agreement” that Bush signed.  Bush signed that agreement having listened to his generals – something Obama has STILL never done – and understanding that the agreement would do nothing to constrain our policy objectives because there were plenty of ways for our troops to remain and keep the peace we had won.  Rather, Obama unilaterally determined to do something that his generals said was foolhardy and which history has since proven to have been foolhardy.

In 2011, General Jack Keane predicted the complete, unmitigated disaster that Obama’s policies would become:

President Obama’s decision to pull all U.S. forces out of Iraq by Dec. 31 is an “absolute disaster” that puts the burgeoning Arab democracy at risk of an Iranian “strangling,” said an architect of the 2007 troop surge that turned around a losing war.

Retired Army Gen. John M. Keane was at the forefront of persuading President George W. Bush to scuttle a static counterinsurgency strategy and replace it with 30,000 reinforcements and a more activist, street-by-street counterterrorism tactic.

Today, even with that strategy producing a huge drop in daily attacks, Gen. Keane bluntly told The Washington Times that the United States again is losing.

“I think it’s an absolute disaster,” said Gen. Keane, who advised Gen. David H. Petraeus when he was top Iraq commander. “We won the war in Iraq, and we’re now losing the peace.”

U.S. troops will be vacating Iraq at a time when neither Baghdad’s counterterrorism skills nor its abilities to protect against invasion are at levels needed to fully protect the country, say analysts long involved in the nearly nine-year war.

“Forty-four hundred lives lost,” Gen. Keane said. “Tens of thousands of troops wounded. Over a couple hundred thousand Iraqis killed. We liberated 25 million people. There is only one Arab Muslim country that elects its own government, and that is Iraq.

Obama gave up Iraq.  He abandoned Syria after making one of the most foolish threats in history and then proving he was a coward and a paper tiger by abandoning his own words when he declared a “red line” in Syria that Syria stepped across over and over and over again.  And in so doing Obama pissed away any shred of credibility he still had.  And he has NONE now in the eyes of either our enemies or our wavering allies.

And as a result of Obama’s absolute foolish and pathetic gutlessness, consider the results: and HOW DOES THIS NOT PROVE OBAMA HAS FAILED BEYOND CATASTROPHE!!!???

Terrorism Toll 800% Higher Since 2010
“I don’t think people have grasped how significant these numbers are.”
3.29.2016 |
News | Mark Tapson

A new report blames the rapid expansion of Islamist groups across the Middle East and Africa for the booming death toll of terrorism worldwide: a nearly 800 percent rise since 2010.

According to Fox News, terrorism expert Steven Emerson’s nonprofit Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) found that an average of nearly 30,000 people per year have been killed by terrorists since 2010, when terrorism’s death toll was 3,284. The study identifies two troubling trends: more attacks are happening, and they are deadlier than ever.

Emerson, the executive director of IPT, said,

“Everyone has known that terrorist attacks have generally been increasing yearly since 9/11. But the magnitude of the increase of the attacks surprised us, especially in the past five years. Even if you look back at the annual reports issued by the most senior analysts in the top five intelligence and counter-terrorism agencies, there is not one report that predicted or forecasted that we would likely see such a massive escalation of attacks.”

The study credits the rise in part to the fact that Islamist terror groups like Boko Haram in Nigeria, Al Shabaab in Somalia, a resurgent Taliban, Palestinian terrorists, and President Obama’s JB team ISIS are operating in more countries than ever, especially in the Middle East and Africa.

Deaths Due To Terrorism

Fox reports:

IPT’s report used data collected by the University of Maryland’s Global Terrorism Database. Looking at various intervals following the 9/11 attacks, and sorting out deaths caused by clear acts of terrorism — not simply war involving known terrorist groups — IPT found annual terror deaths have jumped 774 percent since the 2007-11 average.

‘[The numbers] are striking when you take into account where the numbers were at the beginning period,” said Pete Hoekstra, who chaired the House Intelligence Committee when he represented Michigan in the U.S. Congress. “I don’t think people have grasped how significant these [death toll] numbers are.” […]

The attack we just saw in Orlando, Florida – THE worst mass shooting in all of American HISTORY very much in spite of the fact that this is a nation that has been a gun culture from day ONE – ought to be all you need to prove that things are getting worse and worse and worse rather than better and better and better.

When you look at the giant jump in terrorist killings between 2012-13 and 2014-15 – to the tune of a DOUBLING of deaths caused by terrorism – we can consider the trend and safely estimate that terrorism will create at least 45,000 deaths in the 2016-17 year range and as many as 60,000 deaths.  Which is to say that by the time Obama leaves office, he will be personally responsible for a 1,270 percent increase to as much as a 1,707 percent increase in terrorist killings during his watch.

Question: How can these people say their policies and their strategies and their solutions have done anything but fail and then wildly fail and then demonically fail some more???  Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and the whole LOT of Democrats are now proven rabid fools by the only measure that matters: the measure of actual fact.

According to the United Nations, there are more refugees in the world today fleeing terror and horror and murder than at any time in all recorded human history.

Think about it: if you are a Democrat, you are actually so demon-possessed insane-stupid to believe these are good things, and that Obama making the world a thousand percent PLUS worse than Bush is a good thing.

That’s where we are at now: we are dealing with a Party that is lock, stock and barrel owned by Satan.  And Barack Obama is Allah’s Most Useful Idiot.

It is beyond amazing that we have had THOUSANDS of terrorist attacks with tens of thousands of deaths, and yet somehow the fact that 99.99999999999999999999 percent of these attacks have been from people claiming to be Muslims killing in the name of Allah is nothing but the most trivial coincidence.

It’s not enough that they dismiss the obvious link between terrorism and Islam and Islam and violence.  I’ve written about why it is a genetic, pathological condition that stems from the Prophet Muhammad himself as revealed in both the Qur’an and the history of Islam.  The very word “assassin” came from the first Muslim Fedayeen in the 11th century.  The Muslim terrorists we see today are as old as Islam.  That followed Muhammad’s reign of terror and violence in Arabia; that followed the vicious split between Sunni and Shiite over who should succeed Muhammad upon his death; that was subsequently followed by the invasion of Christian Europe by Muslims that was finally stopped in FRANCE on the opposite side of the continent by Charles “the Hammer” Martel one hundred years after Muhammad’s death (by poisoning by his own Muslim followers); and after that there was the Muslim attempted violent conquest of Spain until they were stopped by El Cid.  at some point, of course, rabidly intolerant Muslims built their Dome of the Rock DIRECTLY ON  TOP of the Wailing Wall that represents the holiest site in all Judaism.  And if Democrats had any integrity whatsoever, they would demand that Islam tear down that mosque and allow Israel to have the sacred site that was clearly there first BECAUSE MUSLIMS BUILT THEIR DAMN MOSQUE DIRECTLY ON TOP OF IT.  Again, our own founding fathers had to deal with Islamic terrorists, because that’s exactly what the Barbary Pirates were.

Islam is violence and it is terrorism.  And it always HAS been violence and terrorism unless it was cowed into being peaceful by the raw power of those who would otherwise be forced to submit to Islam.

That’s right.  Islam means “Submission.”  And because of Islam SOMETHING and SOMEONE is going to be FORCED to submit; either they will submit or they will submit us to their totalitarian political system masquerading as a peaceful religion.

But Democrats go even FARTHER, and slander and demagogue in such a manner that any attempt to point out the truth about the nature of Islam, or the demand that Muslims come to grips with the obvious violence that is routinely carried out by this “peaceful” religion, is somehow inciting and thereby being responsible for even more violence from these savage beheaders.  In fact, they tell us, even to try to put them in prison is itself an incitement; which is why we must first of all acknowledge that America is actually to blame for terrorism and then dismantle Gitmo.

PLEASE stop and think about that whackjob blather: think of how most of the 1.6 billion Muslims who live in Muslim countries treat women, treat gays, etc.  If you TRULY don’t want to incite and inflame Muslims, HOW THE HELL COULD YOU VOTE FOR A DAMN WOMAN PRESIDENT WHEN THAT IS PROBABLY THE ULTIMATE INSULT TO MUSLIMS???

THIS is what Hillary Clinton ought to be doing if she or her Democrat Party truly wants to respect Islam (standing there in her hijab because she doesn’t have the damn right to do anything else):

Hijab picture

This is how MOST Muslim women on this planet dress: WHY DON’T YOU DRESS THAT WAY, DEMOCRAT???  Because you WOULD, IF you had any honor or decency or virtue or integrity whatsoever based on your own constant denunciations against conservatives for “inciting” more terrorism.

I mean, at least Hillary doesn’t drive a car, because she is a rich elitist who has been chauffeured around most of her life.  But NO Democrat woman ought to be driving a car, or getting an education, or being viewed in public without a male relative to escort her and order her around, or being viewed at ALL because she will wear a hijab.

Oh, mindless liberal, you say Muslims are FINE with a female president as you keep (falsely and frankly idiotically) lecturing us that the only reason the Muslim terrorist attacked was because he was homophobic – you know, due to Republicans’ and Christians’ insistence on basic morality???  Well, listen to an imam who taught the Orlando shooter Omar Mateen:

A fundamentalist Muslim imam who hosted an online seminary course attended by Orlando terrorist Omar Mateen – but who denied ties to the “gay” nightclub murderer – told Greta Van Susteren during a Fox News interview that Hillary Clinton shouldn’t be president because according to his faith’s prophet, her anger during her monthly menstruation cycle would make her a poor leader.

“As a Muslim, I object to Hillary Clinton,” said Abu Taubah, who’s also gone by the name of Marcus Dwayne Robertson, a former U.S. Marine who’s worked as a bodyguard for Omar Abdel-Rahman, the “Blind Sheik,” Breitbart reported. The “Blind Sheik” was involved in the 1993 World Trade Center attack.

He expanded on his views of women in leadership roles, saying the idea wasn’t compatible with his religious beliefs.

“I don’t believe women should be the president of a nation. … [Our prophet] taught us that whenever a woman is in charge, is going to be problems,” he said. “What if she’s on her menses and it’s time to go to war, she going to press the button cause she’s angry? I like Bernie [Sanders].”

If you truly don’t want to offend Islam, VOTE FOR WHATEVER MAN IS RUNNING AGAINST HER.  OR AT LEAST PLEASE SHUT UP WITH YOUR PC BULLCRAP THAT CONSERVATIVES ARE “OFFENDING” MUSLIMS AND KEEPING THIS WAR GOING WHEN IT IS YOU WHO ARE OFFENDING MUSLIMS AND KEEPING THIS DAMN WAR GOING BY YOUR OWN LOGIC.

In the same way, given Koranic teaching, given the teaching embraced by the entirety of the Islamic world, how do you justify passing LGBT and gay marriage laws???  How is THAT not a giant, radical, massive act of defiant incitement against Islam???  If you want to show “tolerance” and “respect” for Islam, Democrats, you are STONING these depraved infidel perverts.  BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT MUSLIMS DO ALL OVER THE DAMN WORLD.

Bottom line, to the extent that Muslims have any right to hate us, any right to blame us, any right to attack us, it is because of DEMOCRATS and ONLY because of Democrats.

And yet the same demonic bureaucrats otherwise known as DEMOCRATS maintain that just as Obama has been “successful” in his strategy against terrorism (that has nothing to do with Islam; nope, nothin’ to see here, folks!) likewise believe that their own IN-YOUR-FACE-ISLAM liberal policies are anything other than justifications for continued Muslim terrorist slaughter of Westerners.

No human being could even possibly be that stupid unless “the god of this world” were “blinding their eyes so they cannot see” (2 Corinthians 4:4).  And yet we’re seeing this level of stupid all around us.

Lastly, there is this vile myth that somehow Obama and Hillary Clinton are these “voices of tolerance” against the rabid intolerance of Trumps and against conservatives and against Christians.  I am just so beyond SICK of it.  Donald Trump – responding to Obama’s childish rant – pointed out the fact that Obama was far angrier at Trump than he was at the Orlando terrorist shooter.  And other than demonizing guns and our Bill of Rights that guarantees Americans have the absolute constitutional right to keep and bear them, Obama is absolutely bloodless and passionless about decrying the terrorism that he still steadfastly refuses to identity the actual damn SOURCE of.  In his childish, unhinged rant he refers to demands that he acknowledge Islam as the source of terrorism as a “magic word,” as if it truly doesn’t matter whether or not we know who our enemy is and that it makes no difference if we blindfold ourselves and swing wildly in all directions rather than having a coherent strategy that will actually do something other than produce death tolls that increase over a thousand percent.  Because no you are NOT merely “calling it a different name”; you are finally correctly identifying its actual source which means we could finally DO SOMETHING TO DEAL WITH IT AND STOP IT.

Again, when terrorism has already increased over 800 percent during your failed watch, Obama, and is likely to have increased by over FIFTEEN HUNDRED PERCENT by the time you finally leave your wretched office, maybe, just maybe, you HAVEN’T done “everything to do with actually defeating terrorism.”  Maybe it’s YOU who ought to stop your “yapping” you craven, yapping hyena.

I want you to see the result of Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s hateful rhetoric against Trump and against conservatives.  Because one political party in America today – the Democratic Party – has actually OPENLY EMBRACED political viciousness and violence and thuggishness and I dare say TERRORISM against the other party:

7

6

10

That’s what it looks like to be a conservative today as Democratic Party Nazi SA Brownshirt thugs surround you and start attacking you.

We are watching organized Democrat violence against the Republican Party.  And the Democrats, like the Nazis, actually make the Nazi claim that their victims deserve their vicious beatings.

Democrats are nothing short of the worst hypocrites who ever lived in all of human history.

Obama and Hillary Clinton are seemingly gleefully allowing terrorism abroad and terrorism from their own party.

In Greek mythology, there is the story of Cassandra, who was given a box by the god Apollo and told never to open it.  But curiosity got the better of her, and so she opened it and was able to clearly see the future.  But the gods, in their stratagem to solve the crisis, ordained it that while Cassandra would scream and rave of what would be, no one would ever believe her.

That is precisely what it is like to be a Bible-believing Christian and a conservative thinker in today’s mass -media-mindless world.

And so people like me sit here, stunned, having predicted for eight terrible years that Obama would fail in every way, and having been proven right over and over with every matter, realizing the horror of living in a world where truth means nothing, and reality means nothing, and morality means nothing.

 

Worst Mass Shooting In U.S. History A Terrorist Attack. And Consider How Obama Dismantled America To Bring This Hell Here.

June 12, 2016

As we listen to Obama’s absolute drivel as he pathetically tries to explain away how we got into this hell-hole we are now in where we USED to be safe but clearly no longer are, let’s check in with the warning that George Bush offered and see the contrast:

“Failure in Iraq will cause generations to suffer, in my judgment. al-Qaeda will be emboldened. They will say, “Yes, once again, we’ve driven the great soft America out of a part of the region.” It will cause them to be able to recruit more; it will give them safe haven. They are a direct threat to the United States.

And I’m going to keep talking about it. That’s my job as the president, is to tell people the threats we face and what we’re doing about it. They’re dangerous, and I can’t put it any more plainly to the American people, and to them, we will stay on the offense. It’s better to fight them there than here.” — President George W. Bush, May 24, 2007

We WON the Iraq War, as I shall proceed to document; Barack Obama lost it AFTER our soldiers won it and secured it and pulled all our troops out over all of our generals’ warnings of catastrophe if he did so.  And from that point, everything that Bush said would happened proceeded to happen: the SAME thing happened that happened when Bill Clinton gave us Osama bin Laden’s “Americans are paper tigers” speech after Clinton cut-and-ran from Somalia in 1993 that resulted ultimately in the 9/11 attack in 2001.   Terrorists not only received a “safe haven” from Obama; they actually created the caliphate that was Osama bin Laden’s DREAM.  They have not only been able to recruit more, but FAR MORE, more than anyone could have possibly imagined before the Turd-in-Chief took office.

It is a fascinating thing.  Because President Bill Clinton left America both weak – by disassembling our military – and blind – by disassembling our entire intelligence establishment and even erecting the walls that prevented communication between intelligence and law enforcement – the United States was viciously hit with the worst terrorist attack in history on 9/11/2001 in an attack that had been planned for years while Clinton did nothing and struck us less than eight months into Bush’s presidency.  It was because of Bill Clinton’s cowardly policies in Somalia that a would-be-terrorist named Osama bin Laden first began to call America a “paper tiger” and dreamed of attacking the United States.  And as a result of that attack, President Bush rebuilt our military and made it powerful again, rebuilt our intelligence capability and broke down the walls that kept our various intelligence agencies from sharing information, and fought the terrorists over there so they wouldn’t be able to come over here.

And it worked.  Even the war that Democrats treasonously did EVERYTHING to turn into a defeat was won by Bush.  The terrorist enemy in Iraq themselves communicated their defeat in their own transmissions saying, “We are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.”

There is ABSOLUTELY ZERO QUESTION we won the war in Iraq.  Even Obama’s Vice President Joe Biden acknowledged it: “I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.”  And Barack Obama himself acknowledged in February 2009 that he had been handed victory rather than defeat: ““This strategy is grounded in a clear and achievable goal shared by the Iraqi people and the American people: an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.”

But Obama proceeded to ignore EVERY SINGLE ONE OF HIS GENERALS and made a terrible, terrifying, and frankly treasonous mistake that is documented in a 2009 article that proves that everything that Obama has said since about his decision to unilateral cut-and-run from Iraq the abject lie that it always was:

US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.

Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”

Petraeus, Gates and Odierno had hoped to sell Obama on a plan that they formulated in the final months of the Bush administration that aimed at getting around a key provision of the U.S.-Iraqi withdrawal agreement signed envisioned re-categorising large numbers of combat troops as support troops. That subterfuge was by the United States last November while ostensibly allowing Obama to deliver on his campaign promise.

Gates and Mullen had discussed the relabeling scheme with Obama as part of the Petraeus-Odierno plan for withdrawal they had presented to him in mid-December, according to a Dec. 18 New York Times story.

Obama decided against making any public reference to his order to the military to draft a detailed 16-month combat troop withdrawal policy, apparently so that he can announce his decision only after consulting with his field commanders and the Pentagon.

The first clear indication of the intention of Petraeus, Odierno and their allies to try to get Obama to amend his decision came on Jan. 29 when the New York Times published an interview with Odierno, ostensibly based on the premise that Obama had indicated that he was “open to alternatives”.

The Times reported that Odierno had “developed a plan that would move slower than Mr. Obama’s campaign timetable” and had suggested in an interview “it might take the rest of the year to determine exactly when United States forces could be drawn down significantly”.

The opening argument by the Petraeus-Odierno faction against Obama’s withdrawal policy was revealed the evening of the Jan. 21 meeting when retired Army Gen. Jack Keane, one of the authors of the Bush troop surge policy and a close political ally and mentor of Gen. Petraeus, appeared on the Lehrer News Hour to comment on Obama’s pledge on Iraq combat troop withdrawal.

Keane, who had certainly been briefed by Petraeus on the outcome of the Oval Office meeting, argued that implementing such a withdrawal of combat troops would “increase the risk rather dramatically over the 16 months”. He asserted that it would jeopardise the “stable political situation in Iraq” and called that risk “not acceptable”.

The assertion that Obama’s withdrawal policy threatens the gains allegedly won by the Bush surge and Petraeus’s strategy in Iraq will apparently be the theme of the campaign that military opponents are now planning.

Keane, the Army Vice-Chief of Staff from 1999 to 2003, has ties to a network of active and retired four-star Army generals, and since Obama’s Jan. 21 order on the 16-month withdrawal plan, some of the retired four-star generals in that network have begun discussing a campaign to blame Obama’s troop withdrawal from Iraq for the ultimate collapse of the political “stability” that they expect to follow U.S. withdrawal, according to a military source familiar with the network’s plans.

The source says the network, which includes senior active duty officers in the Pentagon, will begin making the argument to journalists covering the Pentagon that Obama’s withdrawal policy risks an eventual collapse in Iraq. That would raise the political cost to Obama of sticking to his withdrawal policy. […]

It is impossible for anyone who either has a functioning brain cell or who is NOT demon-possessed to rationally argue that what President George W. Bush predicted on July 12, 2007 would happen if a future fool like Obama got his way is not EXACTLY what happened JUST AS ALL OUR GENERALS ALSO PREDICTED WOULD HAPPEN:

“To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States,” Bush cautioned.

He then ticked off a string of predictions about what would happen if the U.S. left too early.

“It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to Al Qaeda.

“It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale.

“It would mean we allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan.

“It would mean we’d be increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.”

First Obama COMPLETELY and UNILATERALLY ABANDONED Iraq.  It had NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO with Obama’s bogus pile of lies about a “status of forces” agreement.  As I just documented above, Bush had a strategy to remain in Iraq and all of his generals understood the various ways that U.S. forces would be able to remain in Iraq.  It is a simple fact of history that Obama wanted out of Iraq and he got us out of Iraq.  And the terrible and tragic consequences of his incredibly foolish and frankly immoral decision have been hell for us ever since.  Because only a truly wicked leader walks away from all that his own soldiers had died fighting for years to secure.

Just as Obama handed the terrorists Iraq back AFTER our soldiers had fought and given their own blood to liberate, Obama also gave away Syria.  Obama’s utter failure as a leader to follow through with his “red line” was a shocking signal of American weakness to both our friends and our enemies alike.  John Kerry admitted that Obama “altered perceptions” of both our friends and our enemies when he declared a red line in Syria and then backed away from his red line and even outright lied about having given it; both Obama’s Secretaries of Defense Robert Gates and Leon Panetta declared it destroyed American credibility; Obama’s Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said the same, adding that Obama micromanaged the Defense Department with arrogant know-nothing idiots and tried to destroy him when he decided he had to do what was right for America.  The president of the foremost foreign policy think tank in the world – the Council on Foreign Relations – said American credibility took a major hit after Obama’s red line fiasco.  As a result of Barack Obama, our enemies have been rabidly emboldened and know for a fact that the United States WILL NOT act in its interests or protect its allies against tyranny and even hostile attacks (think Ukraine, think Egypt); and our historic allies are dismayed, uncertain and looking anywhere other than America for a strong power who will support them.  Every single one of those people is an Obama appointee and even THEY admit that Obama’s foreign policy was beyond foolish.

A terrorist group that essentially did not even EXIST when George W. Bush was president – and if you doubt me show me ONE MAJOR NEWS MEDIA ARTICLE ABOUT ISIS/ISIL prior to Bush’s leaving office because there was nothing to report – has under Barack Obama first flowered and then flourished into the caliphate that it is today.  ISIS was a disgruntled offshoot of al Qaeda, and they were disgruntled because Bush DEFEATED al Qaeda.  And that group that had fewer than fifty disgruntled and defeated terrorists when Bush was president found refuge in Syria and leveraged that territory into the Iraq that Obama abandoned.  And hell on earth was the price to pay for Obama’s wicked foolishness.

Every single thing George W. Bush said if America didn’t stay the course on a war that it didn’t start but had to fight has come to pass.

But here is the most significant prediction and today is the time to remember it.  President Bush said:

 “It’s better to fight them there than here.”

Say what you want; George W. Bush kept America SAFE.  We were massively HIT and then WE HIT BACK HARDER.  And our soldiers went to war and fought heroically quoting their commander-in-chief.

Compare that record to what Barack Obama has compiled since he dismantled our military and dismantled every single aspect of our war against terror and thereby allowed terror to terrorize us at home.

There is absolutely NO QUESTION that this was a terrorist attack: the terrorist murderer was heard by numerous witnesses screaming “Allahu Akbar!” as he executed fifty people and wounded 53 others.  Not that reality matters to Obama and demon-possessed Democrats who support him: the terrorist murderer who murdered thirteen and wounded nineteen in Fort Hood in 2009.  He too screamed “Allahu Akbar!”  But Obama dishonestly and wickedly claimed it was “workplace violence” rather than a terrorist attack.  The same thing happened when another Muslim who gloried in terrorist websites beheaded one woman and tried to behead another, similarly screaming about Allah: workplace violence, Obama dishonestly and wickedly claimed.

You have to realize that Obama would have been desperate to lie to the American people whom he’s lied to so many times before yet again.  Only he can’t lie his way out of this one: Now we’re finding out that this TERRORIST who had SWORN ALLEGIANCE TO ISIS had been on the FBI’s terrorism radar for at least three years.  We’re finding that the terrorist shooter pledged allegiance to Islamic State prior to the attack.  We’re finding out that Islamic State itself is affirming responsibility.  Obama once again utterly failed and his utter failure has resulted in THE worst mass shooting in ALL of American HISTORY.

We’ve come a long way, baby.  We’ve come full circle in the last sixteen years: it began with a massive terrorist attack that transformed George W. Bush into a true wartime president.  And as a true wartime president of the United States, Bush successfully waged that war and won.  And handed peace to a fool named Barack Obama who managed to piss away that peace and not only restore terrorism to what it was on 9/11, BUT ACTUALLY “FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM” IT AN EVEN WORSE THREAT.  And that according to Obama’s own administration officials.

Obama created a CULTURE of terrorism both within and without the United States.  Go back to 2009 and Obama had already so contaminated the military with his political correctness poison that officers were terrified to confront Major Nidal Hasan with his obvious terrorist leaningsYou couldn’t dare speak about about a Muslim military officer being a terrorist in Obama’s Army.  That is just a factBefore his murderous terrorist rampage, Hassan had given a PowerPoint lecture to stunned fellow military officers – who were terrified into silence.  And after the fact Obama still denied the obvious terrorism even after it was revealed that the terrorist major had been in email contact with al Qaeda, had business cards identifying himself as a “Soldier of Allah,” etc.

Then we get to the more recent San Bernardino terrorist rampage – which incredibly Obama also initially tried to deny was terrorism and proceeded to transform the tragedy into one of gun violence rather than of yet another Obama fail to keep America safe from THE ISLAMIC TERRORISM HE REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDGE EVEN EXISTS.  Again, people saw bizarre, crazy stuff that would make any reasonable person’s suspicion radar go off the charts – especially given the fact that the person doing all the bizarre, crazy stuff is a Muslim – but they were cowed into silence over fear that Obama and his leftist roaches would label them “racist.”

Obama has not only failed in keeping us safe from terrorism, but he is simultaneously doing everything he possibly can to disarm the law-abiding American people so only criminals and terrorists will even be able to get their hands on guns.  He can’t and won’t keep us safe and he won’t allow us to keep OURSELVES safe.

The problem with criminalizing guns or bullets is that from that moment on, criminals are the ONLY people who can have them.  And it is by now beyond obvious in places like Chicago that outlawing guns doesn’t do one damn thing to prevent the OUTLAWS FROM GETTING THEM.  There were 2,986 shootings in gun-controlled Chicago.  And it isn’t just Chicago: homicide rates are SKYROCKETING in all the major cities controlled by institutional Democrat power with all the gun control laws to go with it.  The ONLY thing that Democrats guarantee with their fascist and frankly treasonous attack on the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution is that law-abiding people cannot shoot back when vicious thugs and terrorists shoot at them.  And if Democrats can’t ban guns from America, they can at least create “gun-free zones” where Americans are helpless.  And so since 1950, it is an empirical fact that all but TWO of all the two-hundred mass-shootings in America where more than three people were killed occurred in officially designated Democrat gun-free zones.

And yes, the gay nightclub in Orlando was – you guessed it – a designated gun free zone.  Which means the only people who get to have guns are criminals and terrorists and everybody else can cower and beg not to die until the police finally show up.

We have a right to protect ourselves in this country.  At least until Obama is finished dismantling our Constitution.

Obama has utterly failed to protect America or the American people.  Obama stupidly thought he could unilaterally end the war on terror by refusing to fight back and keeping us distracted as first the world exploded into terrorist violence and then America exploded into terrorist violence.  All Obama can do now is try to demonize and blame the guns that have been part of this country since the founding fathers used them to defeat their British oppressors in 1775.

You want to ban guns?  Good!  First ban every single gram of cocaine, heroine, LSD, and ban every single illegal immigrant in the United States such that absolutely no one or NOTHING can get into this country against our laws.  And then you’d at least have the right to politely suggest gun control.  But until then, shut the hell up because the ONLY people who are denied guns when guns are criminalized are law-abiding people who follow the law.  As long as illegal immigrants have free access to America because our borders are wide open and because Democrats aren’t competent enough to check on these people flooding in to our country, we can KNOW FOR A FACT that millions of guns would continue to pour in.

Further, you listen to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton use this opportunity as a political-cheap shot to demonize guns as if the things had never been invented before Obama took office and neither had hate.  Believe me, fools, we had both a’plenty.  What we didn’t have is a pathological fool who has literally created defeat out of victory, who literally spawned the most vicious and virulent terrorist army in the history of the world with his incompetent neglect, and who has created a climate of incredible rage with his massively divisive brand of politics.

We had lots of guns and we had lots of ideologies; what we didn’t have is OBAMA.  He and his party’s depraved folly is the toxic poison that has exploded the world.

It really is amazing: the terrorist who shot up that nightclub IS A REGISTERED DEMOCRAT and it is somehow apparently Republicans’ fault that a member of Obama’s despicable Democrat Party all-too easily avoided any meaningful investigation by Obama’s incredibly incompetent Democrat Party administration.  The Islamic terrorist with long-suspected terrorist ties was able to get his hands on guns not because guns are evil but because Democrats are incompetent to keep Americans safe.

Because of Democrats and Obama and their utterly insane policies, we are so awash in Muslims as it is that there is absolutely no way right now to track all the jihadists with Islamic State sympathies.  And Obama and Hillary Clinton want to let tens of thousands more of them in to make an impossible situation even MORE impossible!!!

Barack Obama is a liar.  And we have to hold this liar responsible as we hold the liar he’s picked to replace him responsible.

 

 

 

 

 

Why Democrats ‘Solution’ In The War On Terror Will Not Work And Amount To Blatherspeaking Gobblygook

March 24, 2016

I heard excerpts of a Hillary Clinton speech yesterday that she delivered at Stanford. It almost made sense.

Almost.

There were only two things missing. And those two things guaranteed that nothing Hillary said would mean any more of a damn thing than anything Obama has flailed at in his seven failed years in office.

What are those two things?

I’ve already written about one in detail, but in short, it is this: you MUST understand the connection between Islamic terrorism and the religion of Islam. If you fail to understand that connection, it is impossible to fight the terrorists. Our effort must necessarily have four foundations: one is military, one is political, one is economic and the most important one of all is religious.

It is RELIGION and specifically THE RELIGION OF ISLAM that motivates the terrorists and serves as their ultimate recruiting tool and their source of passionate resolve and their willingness to die. If you actually think that that ground is “Gitmo,” as your president does, you are an astonishingly morally stupid person, period. Rather, Islamic State is talking about Allah; they’re talking about the Prophet; they’re talking about the Qur’an; they’re talking about jihad; and they’re talking about Islamic eschatology and their determination to bathe the world in blood so that their Twelfth Imam will be forced to reveal himself:

ISIS is consciously and deliberately trying to bring about the end of days:

In broad strokes, al-Qaeda acts like an underground political movement, with worldly goals in sight at all times—the expulsion of non-Muslims from the Arabian peninsula, the abolishment of the state of Israel, the end of support for dictatorships in Muslim lands. The Islamic State has its share of worldly concerns (including, in the places it controls, collecting garbage and keeping the water running), but the End of Days is a leitmotif of its propaganda. Bin Laden rarely mentioned the apocalypse, and when he did, he seemed to presume that he would be long dead when the glorious moment of divine comeuppance finally arrived. “Bin Laden and Zawahiri are from elite Sunni families who look down on this kind of speculation and think it’s something the masses engage in,” says Will McCants of the Brookings Institution, who is writing a book about the Islamic State’s apocalyptic thought.

During the last years of the U.S. occupation of Iraq, the Islamic State’s immediate founding fathers, by contrast, saw signs of the end times everywhere. They were anticipating, within a year, the arrival of the Mahdi—a messianic figure destined to lead the Muslims to victory before the end of the world. McCants says a prominent Islamist in Iraq approached bin Laden in 2008 to warn him that the group was being led by millenarians who were “talking all the time about the Mahdi and making strategic decisions” based on when they thought the Mahdi was going to arrive. “Al-Qaeda had to write to [these leaders] to say ‘Cut it out.’ ” [Atlantic, “What ISIS Really Wants”]

I had already written an article describing that last-days mindset and one side gearing up for an ultimate take-all-or-die war while we have nothing to fight for and literally a determination not to fight at all even as they slaughter us.

Islam MUST be confronted as a religion. Not with violence in the sense of another Crusade, but rather with verbal confrontation in the form of, “Muslims are waging violent jihad in the name of Islam and they truly do appear to have valid Qur’anic justification to do so. What are you going to do as a religion to persuade these people who are exploiting your religion that they are theologically wrong?”

It won’t be easy. But the alternative of burying our civilizational heads in the sand and ignoring a metastasizing cancer that is growing larger and worse literally by the hour is beyond insane.

And yet that is precisely what Democrats have done at this point – INISISTED on doing, in fact – as they have demonized anybody who would cite the facts and draw and accurate conclusion from those facts. These people will look you right in the face and scream that the mere fact that 99.99999999999999999% of violent terrorist attacks are being perpetrated by people who for some mysterious reason insist that they are “Muslims” is nothing but the most bizarre forms of random coincidence.

They refuse to attribute to Islam what people who claim to be Muslims and follow the Five Pillars of Islam and live out the actual words of the Qur’an to Islam; and then they just as stupidly try to argue that people like Timothy McVeigh were “Christians’ basically because he’s white.  It truly doesn’t matter to them that Timothy McVeigh absolutely never claimed to have been a Christian or to have committed his atrocities in the name of Christ or Christianity.

They hide behind rhetoric and pretend reality isn’t really real.

We did this once before as Western Civilization. It was called “the rise of Nazism.” Our refusal to deal with a clearly developing ideology of death led to our being forced to suffer tens and tens of millions of dead and a truly horrifying world war.

And this is shaping up to be far, far worse. Because the same liberals who refused to stand up to and confront a crisis even as it was clearly getting worse and worse are doing “deja vu all over again.” Only there were a few million Nazis and there are more than a BILLION Muslims and some of them have nuclear weapons now.

The left comes with the pseudo-argument that blaming Muslims for terrorism is like blaming Christians for the Ku Klux Klan. Which is the epitome of non sequitur. Because if we should blame ANYBODY or ANYTHING for the KKK, it ought to be the Democrat Party. Because fact: the Ku Klux Klan began as the terrorist arm of the Democrat Party. Which was officially revealed during the Republcian-controlled Senate’s passage of the 1871 Ku Klux KLan Act that Democrats fiercely opposed in their determination to protect their wicked terrorist murderers. The purpose of the KKK was to “to overthrow the Republican state governments in the South during the Reconstruction Era, especially by using violence against African American leaders.” In fact, “its central objective [was] the overthrow of Republican state governments in the South.”

So it is literally demonic for the people who gave birth to the Klan to blame anyone else for it. That’s one. And the Democratic Party today is nothing short of the political expression of rabid hatred against Christians in fulfillment of Jesus’ words, “If they hate you, remember that they hated Me first” (John 15:18).

But now we get to the very essence of why I say it is so tremendously vital that we DO confront Islam with the problem of the fact that 99.9999999% of all violent terrorist acts in the world come from Muslims who follow the Five Pillars of Islam and conduct their violent jihad specifically in the name of Islam. Becuse for those rabid secular humanist Christ-haters who even INSINUATE that Christianity has any racism in it, we can refute their obscene attack with the Word of God. We can point out that the beating heart of Christianity boils down to “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life” (John 3:16). We can demonstrate that “the world” is the world of ALL races and that Christ came on a mission to save ALL humanity rather than just “white people.” And it is frankly demonic to say otherwise. We can document in our Bible that God does NOT show partiality or play favorites (Deuteronomy 10:17; Acts 10:34; Romans 2:11; Ephesians 6:9). The Bible that all true Christians follow as the Word of God says, “For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility” (Ephesians 2:14). The Word of God declares, “If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right.” (James 2:8). Which is to say, racism does not come from God and it does not come from Christianity; it comes from wicked man, it comes from DEMOCRATS.

God DID separate the world into two “racial” groups; BUT those two groups were JEWS and GENTILES and it did not matter if you were white or black or Asian or Arab because you were nontheless a Gentile. In other words, it ultimately wasn’t a racial separation, but a theological one as God created a separate people for Himself and related to His people in a unique manner. And the same God who declared ONLY that one racial/ethnic barrier HIMSELF told us that He destroyed ALL barriers, such that: ““There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are ALL ONE in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28).

Christians can confront wicked, slanderous, libelous charges against them and against their faith in Christ and refute them with the truth of the Word of God.

But the question is, “CAN ISLAM SIMILIARLY DO THAT REGARDING THE ISSUE OF TERRORIST VIOLENCE????” And you ignorant, depraved liberals would be astonished if you knew the truth about what the Qur’an actually teaches. Many atheists have attacked Christianity and the Bible with supporting violence; I both refute that charge and demonstrate that the Qur’an has an incredibly difficult dilemma in refuting violence. Please read my article and see all my facts if you have any doubt as to the truth of what I claim, but in a nutshell it comes down to this: the Old Testament of the Bible (which predates the Qur’an by 2,000 years) DOES call for specific acts of violence against specified enemies at specified times; whereas the Qur’an contains universal edicts to violence that apply in all situations both modern and ancient alike. But it gets worse: because while the Old Testament called for violence, the same Old Testament promised a “New Covenant” of which Jesus Christ literally embodied. And Jesus Christ put aside violence whereas Muhammad started out talking about peace but ended up being a mass-murderer. And Muslims have something called “abrogation” which means that the latter teachings of Muhammad replace the former. So Jesus truly IS the Prince of Peace, but Islam is in a giant quandary over its violence.

And that theological violence needs to be confronted. Because as long as Muslims are allowed to think that they have nothing to do with the problem, they will therefore do nothing to overcome the problem And IF Islam and Muslims accepted responsibility for terrorism and violence and wanted to do something about it, ISIS would be annihilated in less than two weeks.

As it is, the Democratic Party, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are leading all efforts to prevent the war on terror from EVER being over – to the ridiculous extent of even denying that there IS a “war on terror” to begin with.

Just to make one more giant distinction between Christianity and Islam: As I pointed out above, to be a Muslim means to follow the Five Pillars of Islam, according to the Qur’an. And the terrorists DO that; they follow the Five Pillars faithfully. Just to make absolutely certain you understand, THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT BEING PEACEFUL AND NOT MURDERING PEOPLE IN THE FIVE PILLARS OF ISLAM THAT DETERMINES WHETHER OR NOT ONE IS A MUSLIM. Whereas Christianity isn’t about what you do, it is about who you are in Jesus Christ and it is about whether you have the Holy Spirit that He sent in you. “Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again” (John 3:3). Christians all have one thing in common: they all have the Holy Spirit in them because they accepted Jesus’ deity and work by faith and have His Spirit inside them. Ephesians 1:13 makes it crystal clear: we were SEALED in CHRIST with the HOLY SPIRIT of promise. And so we have Jesus in us, and Jesus – unlike Muhammad – was bathed in His OWN blood poured out for our sins whereas Muhammad was bathed in the blood of his enemies just as his true followers the terrorists are.

I submit to you that the only reason the world will not confront Islam with its violence is because everyone who understands anything about Islam understands this fact and is terrified by it.

So that’s one. And Hillary Clinton is as dogmatically opposed to confronting Islam and demanding they theologically confront the terrorist movement on religious grounds as Obama has been. Instead there is nothing but a hand-waving-dismissal, head-of-the-ostrich-in-the-sand contemptuous dismissal of true evil (they view it as a crime the way bank robbery is a crime) and the source of that evil (they view it as “Gitmo” rather than the Islam that it very clearly is).

I laugh every time I hear a liberal blame Gitmo. Because these idiots are actually fool enough to think that the ultra-Islamic terrorists are just peachy happy with the perversions such as homosexual marriage they keep imposing on our culture. What if we elect a woman for president WHEN THEIR QUR’AN GIVES THEM PERMISSION TO BEAT THEIR WIVES TO KEEP THEM IN SUBMISSION, WHEN THEY WON’T ALLOW THEIR DAUGHTERS TO HAVE AN EDUCATION, WHEN THEY CAN’T EVEN DRIVE A DAMN CAR OR APPEAR IN PUBLIC WITHOUT AN ESCORT???

You don’t think this prospect would frighten Muslims: if women can be elected president of the United States, then women should have freedom in Muslim countries??? You’re really unbelievably ignorant enough to actually believe that Muslim terrorists would be fine with women having power over them??? You’re truly that stupid???

Do you REALLY wonder what their actual recruiting tools are??? You’re really fool enough to think it’s Gitmo, that terrorists are somehow enraged that we’re locking up the people who murder us??? You’re actually stupid enough to think the terrorists are saying, “We behead them and burn them alive, but we are not so terrible that we would ever put men in Gitmo.” I mean, you’re actually that stupid to believe the dishonest propaganda that pours out of leftwing media???

The second thing that made Hillary Clinton’s speech and Barack Obama’s entire foreign policy utterly meaningless and in fact absurd is the refusal to show any genuine American leadership.

I wrote an article that was prophetic because I was primarily citing as my source a truly prophetic article titled “Brave Old World” by Victor Davis Hanson. People like us have wisdom that comes from above, comes from GOD, that the left in their anti-supernaturalist and anti-religious and anti-Christian mindset simply cannot see or comprehend. Hanson ends his article by warning:

If we flee Iraq and call off the war on terror, Islamic jihadists will regroup, not disband. And when the Russians attack the next democracy, they won’t listen to the United Nations, the European Union or Michael Moore.

Brace yourself — we may be on our way back to an old world, where the strong do as they will, and the weak suffer as they must.

Which is of course exactly what has happened. Including the damn part about a resurgent, uber-aggressive RUSSIA.

I want you to realize that I speak the truth on that last part: Obama firmly decreed that Assad must go from Syria. Russia said absolutely not. And Russia did what Obama would not do and sent his troops in and literally intimidated the United States out of being where it had previously always been and had successfully kept Russia from being. Obama literally INVITED Russia in, but Russia went into Syria for one purpose and one purpose only: NOT to bomb Islamic State, but to bomb the pro-American forces that America had encouraged and even trained to fight Assad.

Putin and Russia succeeded in their mission: RIGHT IN OBAMA’S AND AMERICA’S HUMILIATED FACE.

Here is what the prestigious journal Defense News says in its analysis:

Considering the resources expended, Russia’s operation in Syria has been labeled by many analysts to have been a great success for Putin. He entered the conflict with clear goals and significantly altered the facts on the ground by saving Assad from an imminent defeat. He also bolstered Russia’s air base in Latakia and a naval facility in the port of Tartus. By withdrawing when he did, Putin looked victorious, but he also is leaving all options on the table.

FACT: Obama has been consistently saying since 2011 that Assad must step down from power in Syria. Obama was blathering the same bold-sounding line as late as November 2015. Of the two leaders of Russia and America, one was a strong, dominant, aggressive force ready to project will, and the other was a timid, weak, pathetic coward who backed down and submitted to the other.

Obama brazenly said that Putin and Russia would be marginalized on the world stage. Now Russia is the one who is in command and Obama who is literally left passively sitting at a baseball game in Cuba when the terrorists attack Brussels and a strong leader is required.

And now when our allies go to the strong, dominant power in the Middle East, they go to RUSSIA and IGNORE America and Obama. Saudi Arabia and Jordan used to be firmly on the side of the United States against the Soviet sphere. Now they’ve gone to Russia. Egypt used to be an American ally opposed to Russia. Now they too have abandoned us because Obama is a weak man who will do nothing to help them and they need to turn elsewhere. Because due to our refusal to get involved and fight, we truly don’t matter. Even Israel has turned away from the United States and toward Russia because Barack Hussein Obama stabbed them in the heart too many times and they know with a dread certitude that they absolutely cannot trust in or rely upon the United States to lift a finger to help them.

Barack Obama is a pure, rabid ideologue and nothing else: the only people on EARTH Obama will stand up to and fight – and fight to the death and to the last dead American – is the Republicans. He will fight Republicans to the death, to the bitter end, amid the dust and ashes of the republic. He will sit next to tyrants and watch baseball games in communist regimes that support terrorism.

And so in 2009 – with Hillary Clinton’s help, fwiw – Obama sought to “reset” relations with our historic opponent Russia. And Obama succeeded wildly, as long as “success” be defined in terms of Russia’s goals and prestige and power at the expense of America’s goals and prestige and power. We lost the reset, Russia won.

So, for example, after Russia invaded and brutally annexed Ukraine the identical same way that Hitler did his annexing and no one did a damn thing to stop it but spout cheap talk the way Obama did, Obama gave one of his infinite speeches and said this a year ago now:

“And that’s why Russia’s violation of international law, its assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, must be met with condemnation, not because we’re trying to keep Russia down, but because the principles that have meant so much to Europe and the world must be lifted up.

Over the last several days, the United States, Europe and our partners around the world have been united in defense of these ideals and united in support of the Ukrainian people. Together, we’ve condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and rejected the legitimacy of the Crimean referendum. Together, we have isolated Russia politically, suspending it from the G-8 nations and downgrading our bilateral ties. Together, we are imposing costs through sanctions that have left a mark on Russia and those accountable for its actions.

And if the Russian leadership stays on its current course, together, we will ensure that this isolation deepens. Sanctions will expand, and the toll on Russia’s economy, as well as its standing in the world, will only increase.

And meanwhile, the United States and our allies will continue to support the government of Ukraine as they chart a democratic course. Together, we are going to provide a significant package of assistance that can help stabilize the Ukrainian economy and meet the basic needs of the people.” – Barack Obama

But due to Obama’s weakness, Russia is now more dominant, more powerful and more NON-isolated than it has ever been since its most dominant days of the U.S.S.R.

Whereas Obama’s appalling weakness and gutless “hands-off” approach in that very theater of Ukraine stunned and appalled even DEMOCRATS:

The approach has drawn criticism not only from Republican adversaries, but also from ranking figures in the Democratic foreign policy establishment, who are pushing ever harder for the White House to do more to stop what they consider the biggest threat to European security since the Cold War.

The split was clear this month, when a group of former senior members of the Obama and Clinton administrations, among others, called on Obama to begin sending weapons and ammunition to Kiev to help government forces fight the Russia-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine.

We’re not going to do anything. And the entire world KNOWS we’re not going to do anything. We’re not going to oppose our enemies and we’re not going to rise up to stand with our friends. That was Bush’s America. That was Reagan’s America. That was the strong, powerful, courageous America that elected Republicans. That America is dead and gone.

And that is why America really, truly doesn’t matter any more.

So Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are spouting their speeches – albeit it in Obama’s case from the luxury deck of a baseball field in Cuba because he is so marginalized and so isolated and so useless that he has nothing whatsoever to do when a significant European ally and member of NATO is attacked by vicious terrorists – and saying that the world needs to come together and unite, “we” need to stand against terror, blah-blah-blah.

But everyone knows that “we” won’t do a damn actual THING.

So look at the reality just since Obama was reelected (you know, having told Vlidimir Putin he would be “more flexible” to betraying America):

2012-2013:

The number of deaths from terrorism increased by 61% between 2012 and 2013, a study into international terrorism says.

There were nearly 10,000 terrorist attacks in 2013, a 44% increase from the previous year, the Global Terrorism Index 2014 report added.

2013-2014:

32,658 people were killed by terrorism in 2014 compared to 18,111 in 2013: the largest increase ever recorded

2014-2015: the report hasn’t come out yet, but does anybody really honestly believe things have gotten better???

Now when we’re just finding out that Islamic State has dispatched more than 5,000 trained terrorists who have fought for ISIS and have now returned to fight for ISIS in Europe to hit targets in coordinated waves, it hasn’t. And it won’t.

But you read these facts, and then you come upon one of those impossible Obama statements that just shows you how pathologically ignorant and how truly dangerous his ignorance makes him:

[T]he truth of the matter is that for all the challenges we face, all the problems that we have, if you had to be — if you had to choose any moment to be born in human history, not knowing what your position was going to be, who you were going to be, you’d choose this time. The world is less violent than it has ever been. It is healthier than it has ever been. It is more tolerant than it has ever been. It is better fed then it’s ever been. It is more educated than it’s ever been. — Barack Obama, June 11, 2014

For the record, just on that last, the most vicious terrorist group in terms of sheer murder is Boko Haram. Boko Haram means “Fake [i.e. Western] education is forbidden.” No we’re not more educated than we’ve ever been; we’re more INDOCTRINATED and PROPAGANDIZED than we’ve ever been. And if Obama himself weren’t so stupid and so ignorant, he wouldn’t have ever said something so obviously completely false.

You just have to marvel at the destructive power of liberalism on the human brain.

Obama and the Democrats running to take his job give the same speech every time there’s a massive terrorist attack. And then they do NOTHING. And then the next attack comes along, and they give the same damn speech. And again do nothing. And so on, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.

And to the extent that Obama is bothering to do ANYTHING, he is committing the very worst folly of Vietnam: gradualization. He doesn’t want to do this; he’s being dragged into it against his will by reality; and he doesn’t have any kind of

We will either roll up our sleeves and go in there and fight and LEAD others to do the same behind us or we will continue marginalizing and isolating ourselves. Because the world is looking for a strong, powerful leader who will protect them. And we’re just not it any longer.

The ONLY way we’re going to defeat Islamic State in their own caliphate that Obama allowed them to carve for themselves is if we use ground forces. That is simply a fact of military reality. Somebody has to go in and take possession of an area. Especially when the enemy has the very easy and simple option of locating in dense civilian population zones and then daring us to indiscriminately kill women and children with airstrikes. But if the United States isn’t willing to commit troops, then no one else will. It is as simple as that. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton can spout all the gibberish they want to, but none of their words will make any more of a difference than Obama’s meaningless, empty, trivial words have made.

And the only way we’ll become “it” again is if we vote Republican.

Here is a list of terrorist attacks from Islamic jihadists just in 2015. Note, it’s really, REALLY long:

The State Of The Union Is TERROR. Obama Has Failed The World And Is Determined To Bring Terrorism Into America.

March 23, 2016

A terror attack in Brussels ought to terrorize the United States and the American people: at least nine of the victims are Americans.

A scripture passage from Mark chapter 12 is highly illustrative when it comes to why Obama will NOT fight terror or even acknowledge that it is a real thing that needs to BE fought:

22 Then one was brought to Him who was demon-possessed, blind and mute; and He healed him, so that the blind and[a] mute man both spoke and saw. 23 And all the multitudes were amazed and said, “Could this be the Son of David?”

24 Now when the Pharisees heard it they said, “This fellow does not cast out demons except by Beelzebub,[b] the ruler of the demons.”

25 But Jesus knew their thoughts, and said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand. 26 If Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then will his kingdom stand?

Obama won’t fight evil because the man himself IS evil.  And evil will not fight evil, because a house divided cannot stand.

You know, the way Obama has divided America and put us at each other’s throats.  Obama has created a spirit of rage and hate and distrust and contempt for both parties and for all government: that’s why we not only have Donald Trump, but Bernie Sanders.  The only reason the Democrat Party isn’t melting down with Sanders taking 71% of all Democrats under 30 years old is because it has an intrinsically and pathologically fascist “super delegate” category in which the Party has lock-step control of the election rather than any genuine “democracy” or “vote.”

You want to talk about Donald Trump?  Okay, let’s.  I PREDICTED that a Donald Trump would arise because of Obama’s spirit of divisive hate in which he broke America into groups and pitted one group against another: race against race, gender against gender, income level against income level, religion against contempt of religion.  And dividing, he conquered by a fifty-plus-one margin that left the rest of the nation seething with increasing rage as he imposed his ideology like a tyrant emperor.  And then Obama set out to break the Republican Party by issuing sweeping executive orders that split the Republican Party as they scrambled and divided in their attempt to react to and deal with naked fascism.  My words on June 18, 2012:

Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit.  Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.

What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States.  And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions.  You mark my words.  Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification???  Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage.  You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching.  And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame.

I told you it would happen and I told you it would happen because of Obama’s hate.  And it happened just as I told you.  Which is why my prediction now stands as a naked FACT as to WHO divided America.

So America is now hopelessly divided because of Obama.  Our allies are weak and won’t support us because they cannot trust our strong commitment.  Because of Obama.  And our worst, most mortal enemies are emboldened and united like they’ve never been.  Because of Obama.

Obama has broken America’s faith; we are severed from GOD because of this wicked man who claimed that “As a Christian, I believe marriage is a sacred union between a man and a woman.”  But wicked man the liar is, he wickedly LIED out of the most craven, most cynical, political reasons.  Obama’s “Christianity” stands for and means less than one of my dog’s poops in the backyard stands for and means.  It is utterly worthless and means nothing and stands for less than nothing.  And now our “religion” is no different whatsoever than the agenda wishlist of the atheist American Civil Liberties Union whose founder once declared, “Communism is the goal.”

“God DAMN America,” Obama’s spiritual leader and mentor said:

Mission accomplished.  Obama is celebrating because those words “No, no, no!  NOT God bless America.  God DAMN America!” are now his “fundamental transformation of America.”  God has always held nations accountable for the wickedness of their kings.  And we actually VOTED for this wicked king.

If you are a Democrat, it is because you have a radical hatred and contempt for God.  And good luck experiencing all the fun promised in the soon-to-be-fulfilled Book of Revelation when you finally get that antichrist you have dreamed of for all your roach lives.

It is an amazing thing the way Bush got blamed for the wars but Obama cut and ran AFTER BUSH WON HIS WAR and now the terrorists as a direct result of Obama’s stupidity are far stronger than they EVER were when Bush was president.  This is an easy thesis to document:

  1. Obama HIMSELF announced we were victorious: “Today, I can announce that our review is complete, and that the United States will pursue a new strategy to end the war in Iraq through a transition to full Iraqi responsibility,” said Obama. “This strategy is grounded in a clear and achievable goal shared by the Iraqi people and the American people: an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant. To achieve that goal, we will work to promote an Iraqi government that is just, representative, and accountable, and that provides neither support nor safe-haven to terrorists.” — President Barack Hussein Obama, February 27, 2009
  2. Vice President Biden went further and called Iraq “one of the great achievements of this administration.”  You explain to me how he could say that in 2010 and Bush be to blame now.  Because if Bush had ruined the world in 2008, what is Biden doing calling it a “great achievement” in 2010???  No, rather, Bush handed Obama a peaceful, stable Iraq that Obama proceeded to flush down the toilet with his idiotic stupidity as he failed to listen to his own generals and foreign policy experts and ruined the world.  Here’s Biden’s quote: “I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.”  — Vice President Joe Biden, 2010
  3. Our enemy in Iraq announced themselves that they were defeated (until Obama gave them life with his treason): “By the end of 2008, in the beginning of 2009, President Bush’s surge strategy led by General Petraeus and General Odierno, now the chief of staff of the Army, defeated the al Qaeda in Iraq.  I saw the transmission because I was advising Petraeus on the ground in Iraq. They showed me the transmissions from al Qaeda that they were intercepting. They said we are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.” — General Jack Keane
  4. Obama ignored all of his generals and advisors in pulling out of Iraq:US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
    By Gareth PorterWASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”Petraeus, Gates and Odierno had hoped to sell Obama on a plan that they formulated in the final months of the Bush administration that aimed at getting around a key provision of the U.S.-Iraqi withdrawal agreement signed envisioned re-categorising large numbers of combat troops as support troops. That subterfuge was by the United States last November while ostensibly allowing Obama to deliver on his campaign promise.Gates and Mullen had discussed the relabeling scheme with Obama as part of the Petraeus-Odierno plan for withdrawal they had presented to him in mid-December, according to a Dec. 18 New York Times story.Obama decided against making any public reference to his order to the military to draft a detailed 16-month combat troop withdrawal policy, apparently so that he can announce his decision only after consulting with his field commanders and the Pentagon.The first clear indication of the intention of Petraeus, Odierno and their allies to try to get Obama to amend his decision came on Jan. 29 when the New York Times published an interview with Odierno, ostensibly based on the premise that Obama had indicated that he was “open to alternatives”.

    The Times reported that Odierno had “developed a plan that would move slower than Mr. Obama’s campaign timetable” and had suggested in an interview “it might take the rest of the year to determine exactly when United States forces could be drawn down significantly”.

    The opening argument by the Petraeus-Odierno faction against Obama’s withdrawal policy was revealed the evening of the Jan. 21 meeting when retired Army Gen. Jack Keane, one of the authors of the Bush troop surge policy and a close political ally and mentor of Gen. Petraeus, appeared on the Lehrer News Hour to comment on Obama’s pledge on Iraq combat troop withdrawal.

    Keane, who had certainly been briefed by Petraeus on the outcome of the Oval Office meeting, argued that implementing such a withdrawal of combat troops would “increase the risk rather dramatically over the 16 months”. He asserted that it would jeopardise the “stable political situation in Iraq” and called that risk “not acceptable”.

  5. In fact Obama has ALWAYS ignored all military advice.  Obama in fact has never ONCE listened to a single decent expert who knew what the hell he was doing.  Because he is a demon-possessed FOOL par excellence.  Obama’s own leaders as well as the military advised him what he needed to do; Obama ignored their wisdom.  And the very hell those generals and leaders predicted came to pass just as they predicted it.  It is a stupid, pathetic, trivial and demonic mind that blames Bush for that.
  6. Furthermore, Bush was RIGHT and Obama was demonically WRONG:  George W. Bush predicted EXACTLY what would happen if we listened to Great Satan Obama:Bush, as discussed on “The Kelly File,” made the remarks in the White House briefing room on July 12, 2007, as he argued against those who sought an immediate troop withdrawal.“To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States,” Bush cautioned.He then ticked off a string of predictions about what would happen if the U.S. left too early:“It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to Al Qaeda [Bush could not conceive that Obama would give birth to an even MORE vicious monster Islamic State that made al Qaeda look, well, “JayVee” in comparison].“It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale [Yep, that sure happened thanks to Obama].“It would mean we allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan [Yep, check again: for the first time in the history of the world we have a true terrorist army that has created its own giant CALIPHATE.  Never saw anything like that when George W. Bush was president.  That is simply a fact].“It would mean we’d be increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.”  [Check yet again.  And since Obama stupidly gave Russia hegemony over the region, it would mean risking World War III.  All because Barack Hussein Obama is the worst fool who ever lived].
  7. Now add to that unmitigated disaster, that totally unforced error, Obama’s red line fiasco in Syria.  John Kerry said Obama “altered perceptions” of both our friends and our enemies when he declared a red line in Syria and then backed away from his red line and even outright lied about having given it; both Obama’s Secretaries of Defense Robert Gates and Leon Panetta declared it destroyed American credibility; Chuck Hagel said the same, adding that Obama micromanaged the Defense Department with arrogant know-nothing idiots and tried to destroy him when he decided he had to do what was right for America.  The president of the foremost foreign policy think tank in the world – the Council on Foreign Relations – said American credibility took a major hit after Obama’s red line fiasco.  As a result of Barack Obama, our enemies have been rabidly emboldened and know for a fact that the United States WILL NOT act in its interests or protect its allies against tyranny and even hostile attacks (think Ukraine, think Egypt); and our historic allies are dismayed, uncertain and looking anywhere other than America for a strong power who will support them.
  8. Both military leaders, civilian leaders of the military and national security and foreign policy, and numerous conservatives such as MYSELF stated that Obama’s idiotic plan to pull out of Iraq would lead to disaster.  In any valid scientific laboratory, we were verified to be 100 percent scientifically proven RIGHT and Obama and every fool who believes in Obama was proven to be a demoniac jackass who hates the United States of America and is plotting its destruction.  In August 2008, I predicted, and I quote: “A vote for Barack Obama is a vote for forfeiting Iraq, and then having to come back in a few years to do it all over again – this time against a determined Iranian insurgency.”  You tell me I was wrong, you demon-possessed Nazicrat Party liars, because all you have is a demonic delusion in your fool minds and I have all the actual facts.
  9. And as a result, I have with all those facts and evidence and history itself behind me written articles like this one: ‘The Tide Of War Is Receding’: Barack Obama Is ENTIRELY Responsible For The Disastrous Meltdown In Iraq And Across The Middle East and Iraq: Bush’s Victory, Obama’s Despicable Defeat.
  10. And therefore Iraq has been in meltdown, Syria is a shambles, Libya is a shambles, Yemen is a shambles (and CONSIDER the debacle in Yemen given what Obama stupidly said), Egypt is a shambles, etc. etc.  Obama guaranteed Iran would have nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles to deliver them to us and so terrorize us from acting in the region.  Russia and Iran are now without any question have hegemony over the Middle East.  And Israel is isolated and abandoned.  Which is why Israelis say Obama is the WORST American president in history.  And as I document three paragraphs below, Obama has cursed the world with more refugees than it has ever seen in all of human history.

So let’s refresh ourselves with what we just learned.  Both Obama and his vice president were both on record taking credit for Iraq AFTER Bush handed off a stable, peaceful Iraq having broken the terrorist army.  All Obama had to do was remain in Iraq with a relatively small force, just as we have done in Japan and Germany and in South Korea.  Obama’s military leaders were adamant that he stay, having told him in advance what would happen if he didn’t: namely, that the terrorists who had been defeated would be able to establish another stronghold in the vacuum Obama was stupidly leaving open.  Obama ignored them and the result was chaos just as they had correctly predicted it would be.  Barack Obama literally lost a war that had already been won.  Combine that with Obama’s depraved stupidity in countries like Syria and Libya, and you had a recipe for total disaster.  Again, John Kerry, Chuck Hagel, Leon Panetta, Robert Gates, Obama’s own top people, declared that Obama’s foreign policy had collapsed.  And now we are facing hell.  And it is a hell of Obama’s invention.

Case factually proven.  No one but an abject ideologue who is a complete fool and a total liar would say anything different.  And what do demonic Democrats do?  Blame Bush and blame Benjamin Netanyahu.  Because Bush could operate a pristine china shop, Obama could race through and knock down and break every single piece and blame it on Bush and Democrats would say that Bush destroyed the China.

Because of Barack Hussein Obama – and because to be a Democrat is to be a pathologically wicked liar and fool who will one day spend all eternity screaming in agony in hell and will NEVER be able to pay for the hell on earth you unleashed – there are now more refugees than there have EVER been in the ENTIRE history of the human race.

And so as a result the number of terrorist groups have exploded under Obama causing the number of terrorist attacks to have skyrocketed which caused the number of deaths caused by terrorist attacks have QUADRUPLED under Obama.

But if you’re a Democrat, you are too evil to understand or comprehend reality, you are too hell bent bending over for homosexual sodomy and too murderous in slaughtering our babies by the tens of millions to see anything but the blood covering your fangs and faces and eyes.

Obama blathers utterly meaningless, hollow, trivial speeches in flat tones, saying “we can and will defeat those who threaten our security.”  Which of course is a passive declaration of what is possible (we can defeat cancer) and future tenses (and one day we’ll actually DO it).  Because we very certainly ARE not actively defeating them.  Bush unleashed more firepower in EIGHT DAYS in Iraq than Obama has in SEVEN YEARS of his whatever-he-calls-what-he’s-doing.  And I earlier this morning heard a military expert say the Pentagon is releasing bombing details that wouldn’t have made it out of the lowest-level squadron briefing room because they are so trivial.  But that’s ALL Obama has to show he’s doing anything.

Obama has exploded the world into bloodshed by delivering us all into the terrorists hands.  And if a president is responsible for fighting a war he shouldn’t have fought, A LEADER IS EVERY BIT AS RESPONSIBLE FOR REFUSING TO RIGHT A WAR HE DESPERATELY NEEDED TO FIGHT FOR THE SAKE OF ALL HUMANITY.

How many attacks have we seen from Islamic State that are described in terms of “the worst death toll since World War II”?  That’s what Brussels just said.  It’s what France recently said after they got nailed a few months ago.  Russia said it when Islamic State brought down one of their passenger jets.  Hundreds have been slaughtered.  And if you go to Africa, THOUSANDS have been slaughtered.  Because for the Democrat Party “Black Lives DON’T Matter.”

Obama becomes like the cuckhold husband who has a gang of thugs break into his house and rape, torture and murder his entire family and then burn his house down.  And oh, Obama was holding a loaded gun the entire damn time but was too afraid to aim it at the thugs and pull the trigger.  That’s what we literally have here.

Barack Obama has failed the world.  And the consequences are going to get so ugly it is beyond UNREAL.

Brussels just got nailed.  At least two suicide bombers in a crowded airport terminal.  At least one other bomb found.  Dozens killed and over a hundred injured.  Because Brussels is screwed along with France and the rest of Europe and frankly the rest of the world as Obama’s unprecedented-in-all-of-human-history crisis refugee situation metasticizes into one terror attack after another.

Or let me put it this way: to coin a phrase Obama made possible, unless you are a “card-carrying soldier of Allah,” Obama has put you – and frankly every decent person on EARTH as Muslims who will most assuredly be subject to being RADICALIZED in the future – in harm’s way.

They already know and are reporting that was Islamic State that pulled it off.  And unlike our own wicked government, they don’t have an Obama to pressure the counter-terror authorities to report it as “workplace violence” or “gun crimes.”

It is an amazing thing, how we utterly failed to stop the San Bernardino terror attack that Obama and his roaches blamed on “gun violence.”  For example,  ABC News reported on a “secret U.S. policy” that blocked immigration officials from looking at the social media posts of visa applicants.  It is frankly remarkable.  Even worse, the female terrorist who came to curse us from Pakistan by way of Saudi Arabia, used a false address in her application to obtain a K-1 visa to come here.  Quoting the Los Angeles Times, “Testifying to the Senate Judiciary Committee, FBI Director James Comey said Wednesday that the FBI has determined “they were radicalized before they started courting or dating each other online, and as early as the end of 2013 were talking to each other about jihad and martyrdom.”  The left wants to say, “Ha!  You got it wrong!  Terror bride Tashfeen Malik did NOT use a fake address.  And they cite a report that “Local residents say the version of the address provided is not precise, but the family does own a house in the neighborhood.”  DUMBASSES!  If I give you my NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR’S ADDRESS, let alone cite some address somewhere in the dang neighborhood where I live, I gave a false address, okay?  And since such information is highly specific, ANY false address would be equally misleading and equally bad.

Then you have Obama’s interference:

Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
Jonah Bennett Reporter
4:52 PM 12/10/2015

The FBI has taken heat for failing to immediately classify the San Bernardino shootings as terrorism, but a new report shows that FBI reluctance could have been due to external pressure from the White House.

A source told Jack Murphy of SOFREP that the FBI instantly believed the shooting, which left 14 dead, to be a clear act of terrorism. The White House, however, didn’t feel the same way and quickly moved in to squash the terror classification.

This source added that as soon as the shooting took place, Obama convened a meeting with the National Security Council and the heads of other federal enforcement agencies to discuss a public relations strategy.

“A public relations strategy.”  NOT a counter terrorism strategy.  Not a plan to bomb Islamic State into the stone age.  “A public relations strategy.”

Was there ANY question in HELL that this was a terrorist attack???  The liberal Atlantic puts it this way:

During a press conference in San Bernardino on Thursday, law-enforcement officials noted that the two dead suspects in Wednesday’s massacre had stockpiled an enormous arsenal: thousands of rounds of ammunition, 12 pipe bombs, and material to build more. They said that the couple, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, seemed to be preparing for more carnage in separate attacks. They noted “international travel,” and said that “if you look at the amount of obvious preplanning … there was obviously a mission here.” Anonymous officials told various news organizations that they believed the couple was in touch with suspected terrorists.

But when a reporter asked David Bowdich, who heads the Los Angeles field office of the FBI, whether the attack was terrorism, he was careful not to make a ruling.

And we know why that is, of course.  Because Barack Obama is an evil liar with an agenda to “degrade and ultimately destroy the United States of America.”

By the time they acknowledge it was what it was, it is too late to make it anything more than “it is what it is.”  You have to MOVE on these things.  You have to have something Obama does not have and does not want: the TRUTH.

Rather, Obama wants to play games in which he hides – to put it in Clintonesque terms – behind what “the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”  So they quibble and quibble and quibble rather than just acknowledge the damn, literally BLOODY obvious and then DO something about REALITY.

That is the spirit of Obama, the spirit of the Democrat Party.

It is the spirit of lies and deception for the very worst and very most cynical political reasons.

There will be MANY MORE terror attacks.  Because we were fool enough to elect Obama as our king and evil enough to RE-ELECT him.  And unless this wicked nation gets right before God and repents of those evils, we who once called upon the LORD will go down harder than every other nation that ever existed combined.

Obama has demanded that we BRING IN tens of thousands of Muslims who are MOSTLY MEN and whom we cannot possibly vet because either they have no documentation whatsoever or because Islamic State has captured the machines and the blank forms to create their own passports.  Why is this significant?  Listen to what the security officials are saying in Brussels:

A Belgian counterterrorism official put it bluntly in an interview with BuzzFeed just last week.

“We just don’t have the people to watch anything else and, frankly, we don’t have the infrastructure to properly investigate or monitor hundreds of individuals suspected of terror links, as well as pursue the hundreds of open files and investigations we have,” the official said.

He added: “It’s literally an impossible situation and, honestly, it’s very grave.”

And guess what?  WE DON’T HAVE THE PEOPLE EITHER!!!  The FBI has repeatedly said that it is overextended, that they can’t possibly watch all the terrorist suspects (in all fifty states!!!) that are flooding into America.  I pointed out the following when the Muslim refugee crisis that Obama created first boiled over and Obama demanded we take in tens of thousands and Republicans said no freaking WAY:

We already have Islamic State having infiltrated ALL FIFTY STATES IN AMEICA, according to the Director of the FBI.

There are already 1,000 active investigations into Islamic State presence inside America, according to the FBI.

It requires thirty agents to mount a round-the-clock surveillance of a suspect.  The FBI has testified that they do not have the resources to do more than sixty to seventy of these surveillances at one time maximum.  There is simply no possible way we can surveil the terror suspects we’ve already got in our country, let alone the potentially thousands more Obama and the Democrat Party want to let in.

WE ARE BRUSSELS NOW.  Or at least we’re about to be and we definitely will be if we elect another Democrat.

Democrats want American to be more Europe and that’s exactly what’s going to happen.  Obama has decreed it and is making it happen.

Obama’s foolish and wicked policies have guaranteed that America will get hit for YEARS.  Because he’s literally IMPORTED terrorists from overseas.

Because “No, no, no, NOT God bless America, GOD DAMN AMERICA” – Obama’s spiritual guru for 23 years, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, speaking as a prophet

THIS Is What ‘Successful Diplomacy’ Looks Like To Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton And Democrats

January 14, 2016

Barack Obama’s, Hillary Clinton’s and Democrats’ idea of what “successful diplomacy” looks like:

Obama Navy Surrenders

I don’t know what burns my butt more: my warriors on their knees with their hands on their heads in surrender and submission, or the Democrat Party trumpeting it as is illustrated by the following New York Times pull quote:

Their quick release was hailed by the Obama administration as an unintended benefit of the new diplomatic relationship with Iran

Okay, I take it back: I really DO know: surrender and humiliation is bad; reveling in and celebrating surrender and humiliation is far, far worse and far, far more despicable.

As it is, let me give you Obama’s, Clinton’s and the Democrat Party’s version of “serving with honor and distinction” (remember that?  And this is where we are with that pathetic little weasel now) as our Obama military after submissively surrendering abjectly apologizes and thanks Iran for humiliating them:

“We were so wrong.  We’re just infidels, after all.  We are so, so grateful to you for not sawing our heads off as we so truly deserve.”

The more of a traitor you are to your country, the happier Obama and Hillary and their Democrat Party are.

Well, thank you very much for that. I had no idea Obama had promoted Bowe Bergdahl to Lieutenant.  I’m actually surprised that Obama didn’t release a hundred terrorist commanders from Gitmo just to show his gratitude.

I mean, yes this lieutenant violated the heart of the code of military conduct for a US serviceman captured.  Yes, Iran violated every international law in it’s treatment of prisoners.  The photos and videos blatantly violate articles 13 and 17 of the Geneva Convention.  A Politico article points out the following:

“You’re not supposed to take photos to be used in propaganda media,” Pregent told POLITICO in a phone interview Wednesday. “You look at what they released this morning. They have a video of them boarding the ship, Americans on their knees with their hands behind their head, videotaping them as if that’s amusing. That’s a violation of the Geneva Convention.”

By releasing media that makes the sailors identifiable, Pregent added, Iran again violated the Geneva Convention, the international series of treaties setting a standard for treatment of civilians, prisoners of war and soldiers who are unable to fight.

“In this case, the sailors weren’t necessarily prisoners of war, but they were detained, and when you detain uniformed military you have to treat them a certain way, and Iran’s in violation of that,” said Pregent, who noted his opposition to the Obama administration’s Iran deal. “It’s just making a point that this actually did warrant an apology from Iran. This wasn’t just a simple rescue of distressed American sailors after their ship broke down.”

Thank you for violating the Geneva Convention and making us look like the disgraces we are in the age of Obama, Iran.  We thank you for your generosity and kindness.

What the Islamic world saw is America’s warriors on their knees in humiliation, our female soldier submitting to Islam by wearing a hijab, and the United States Navy clearly surrendering.

As for Obama’s new Secretary of State roach that he replaced his last roach with, well, why didn’t you just scoop yourself out one of the Ayatollah’s turds from his toilet and eat it to show how much of their crap you’ll willing to accept???  I mean, hey, Kerry, maybe after that you could give the Ayatollah an enema with your tongue while you’re at it.

As disgusting as that image is, the picture of our warriors surrendering to Iran is massively MORE disgusting.

Would you like to know what REAL “successful diplomacy” and a TRUE “diplomatic relationship with Iran” would look like?

It would look like an Iran TERRIFIED to do something like this to the United States of America or its warriors.

Unfortunately, instead, it looks like another glorious day for “Allahu Akbar!”

Time to hang the American flag upside down again.  Or you can just fly this Obama States of America flag instead. (see my article on that down-memory-lane outrage here).  Either way, it signals the dire distress of the United States of America.

 

The Democrat Party is Pro-Slavery. It Always HAS BEEN And Always Will BE Pro-Slavery

January 4, 2016

I was watching a History channel program on the most bloody battle of the Civil War – the grisly Battle of Antietam with 23,000 men massacred in a single day of fighting – and something popped into my head.

I’ve talked about the Democrat Party being the ideological force that created the Civil War over their determination to keep human beings in the bondage of slavery before.

I’ve also pointed out the basically unbroken chain between the Democrat Party of the Civil War and the STILL racist Democrat Party of today.

Oh, yeah.  I pointed those facts out in articles like “Harry Reid Invokes Slavery To Attack Republicans: The Real Story.”

I’ve written articles on how the Obama Democrat Party STILL wallows in open racism and swims in racial bigotry and feeds off of the bitterness and division and hate they create.

But I didn’t realize one critical way that the Democrat Party is the party of slavery until something occurred to me while I watched that program on Antietam.

The thing that occurred to me is the question, “What would happen if we were fighting the Civil War today, suffering those terrible casualties?”

And there is a crystal-clear, unmistakable answer: liberals would demand peace, and end to the war.  They would demand we stop the fighting and withdraw, suspend combat operations, cut-and-run.  It is who they are.

Okay, fine.  Great for Democrats.  They can claim to be the party that brought us an end to war.

But what would that have meant?  Well, it would have guaranteed that the institution of human slavery would remain intact.  Because the only way the Confederate States of America was EVER going to give up slavery is if they were FORCED to by strong men who were willing to take a stand and fight.

Today, thanks to the complete moral cowardice of Democrats, we have deaths from terrorism having already quadrupled under Obama, terrorism having increased by 150 percent in the first five years of Obama and a further 81% last year alone  – and that figure will be FAR worse when they tally it early this coming year as compared to 2014 – and we have the worst human refugee crisis in the recorded history of mankind as Obama’s failure to lead has created bloodbath after bloodbath that millions of refugees are forced to flee from.

This is a president who denied that there was a “war on terror” or for that matter any “war” at all; he played rhetorical word-games and created PC phrases like “overseas contingency operation” and “man-caused disasters” to masquerade the truth while Islamic State grew and grew and grew into a powerful monster.

And so, thanks to Obama and to every single Democrat being a coward and a liar, we have SLAVERY.  And slavery of the very worst and very most vile sort.

THIS is the real picture of the “war on women” today.  And it is ENTIRELY due to the Democrat Party:

Because to be a Democrat is to “hate war” and therefore to love the consequences of withdrawing from wars we desperately need to fight to prevent far greater evils.

So, yes, it really doesn’t matter how you slice it: if you are a Democrat, you stand for slavery and you always HAVE stood for slavery.

 

Cockroach Democrats Go From Supporting Bush’ War On Terror, To Claiming Being Like Bush Is Evil, To Claiming We’re Just Like Bush

December 30, 2015

If you are a Democrat, you are the lowest form of hypocrite there is, there ever has been or there ever will be.

Let me simply point out the fact that the Democrat Party voted to support George Bush’s War on Terror after the 9/11 attack, and then treasonously cut-and-ran on their duty WHILE OUR TROOPS WERE IN THE FIELD FIGHTING FOR THE WAR THEY VOTED FOR.  In fact, now-President Obama and President wanna-be Hillary Clinton BOTH voted to cut off all funding for our troops while they were still in the field fighting on foreign soil while hoping that traitors wouldn’t abandon them at home.  And at this point it is beyond obvious that the only way the United States will actually be able to end this war on terror with victory will be to hunt down every single Democrat  with dogs and burn them all alive.

Allow me to present the list of Democrat Senators who voted for George Bush’s Iraq War Resolution.  I made the list easier to see by pasting in only those Democrats who voted “yes.”  Note that the final tally of 29 Democrats voting yes – which represents very nearly 60% of all Democrats in the U.S. Senate – is cited:

Senate Roll Call: Iraq Resolution

Friday, October 11, 2002

Following is an alphabetical listing by state of how each senator voted on President Bush’s Iraq resolution. A “yes” vote was a vote to grant President Bush the power to attack Iraq unilaterally. A “no” vote was a vote to defeat the measure. Voting “yes” were 29 Democrats and 48 Republicans. Voting “no” were 1 Republican, 21 Democrats, and 1 Independent.

Arkansas Blanche Lincoln (D): Yes
California Dianne Feinstein (D): Yes
Connecticut Christopher Dodd (D): Yes Joseph Lieberman (D): Yes
Delaware Joseph Biden (D): Yes Thomas Carper (D): Yes
Florida Bill Nelson (D): Yes
Georgia Max Cleland (D): Yes Zell Miller (D): Yes
Indiana Evan Bayh (D): Yes
Iowa Tom Harkin (D): Yes
Louisiana John Breaux (D): Yes Mary Landrieu (D): Yes
Massachusetts John Kerry (D): Yes
Missouri Jean Carnahan (D): Yes
Montana Max Baucus (D): Yes
Nebraska Ben Nelson (D): Yes
Nevada Harry Reid (D): Yes
New Jersey Robert Torricelli (D): Yes
New Mexico
New York Hillary Clinton (D): Yes Charles Schumer (D): Yes
North Carolina John Edwards (D): Yes
North Dakota Byron Dorgan (D): Yes
South Carolina Ernest “Fritz” Hollings (D): Yes
South Dakota Thomas Daschle (D): Yes Tim Johnson (D): Yes
Washington Maria Cantwell (D): Yes
West Virginia Jay Rockefeller (D): Yes
Wisconsin Herb Kohl (D): Yes

Notice also that all of the top Democrats of the time voted “yes” including Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Joe Biden and Harry Reid.

But just like Bush?  Not on your life.  Bush stayed the course; Democrats cut and ran like the cut-and-run roaches that they are.  Bush had integrity; Democrats had cynical exploitation.

And let me point out the fact that to the extent that George W. Bush failed in his war on terror, maybe – just maybe – we ought to do something DIFFERENT and not follow in the same basic fallacy that Bush pursued.  I submit that Bush made two fundamental mistakes: 1) he refused to consider the religious motivation of the Islamic jihadists and confront Islam with its profound and possibly pathological problem of religious-inspired violence; and 2) Bush wrongly believed that “democracy” was an intrinsic good and that any people who voted would vote for freedom when the fact of the matter is that bad and ignorant people will vote in a bad and ignorant way.  And I further submit that since Barack Obama’s strategy has now failed about a thousand times worse than Bush’s – realize that Islamic State emerged COMPLETELY out of the failure of Obama to fight the “war on terror” that he steadfastly refused to even acknowledge and we’ve paid DEARLY for his foolish mistake – maybe we need to pursue a completely different policy and recognize Islamic terrorism and the roots that are sustaining it for what it clearly is.

Anyway, here’s the current story framed the way Democrats want you  to see things now:

On Muslims, Democrats Find an Unlikely Ally: George W Bush
By josh lederman, associated press
·WASHINGTON — Dec 25, 2015, 1:00 PM ET

Taunted by Republicans to declare war on “radical Islamic terrorism,” Democrats are turning to an unlikely ally: George W. Bush.

President Barack Obama, under pressure to be more aggressive on terrorism, regularly cites his predecessor’s refusal to demonize Muslims or play into the notion of a clash between Islam and the West. It’s a striking endorsement from a president whose political rise was predicated on opposition to the Iraq war and Bush’s hawkish approach in the Middle East.

As Hillary Clinton put it, “George W. Bush was right.”

Don’t you DARE try to grab hold of Bush’s coattails now, you miserable ROACHES.

I just want to keep pointing out what I’ve been saying for the official record. Go back in time to early 2011 – when Obama was claiming he had healed the planet – and you’ll find me having said this.  Note in particular the bold-face and italicized paragraph:

Basically, the Judeo-Christian worldview – “Christendom,” if you like – has been treated like a salad bar in the Western Civilization that had been forged by Christianity, and secular humanists can pick out the parts that they like and throw away the rest.  But it’s not a salad bar; Judeo-Christianity as both a religion and a worldview is far more like the foundations of a great building.  And what these secular humanists have been doing is pulling out the foundational pillars one block at a time until there is nothing left to sustain the surrounding structure.

Which is precisely why the West – which used to be called “Christendom” – is now on the verge of complete collapse on virtually every level.

I see the war on terror, and from the start I have seen the glaring flaw in our strategy (yes, even when George Bush was waging it).  Basically, we have confronted totalitarian Islam on the military, political and economic fronts.  But we have utterly ignored the religious front – which is precisely the major front by which totalitiarian Islam has been attacking us.  Like it or not, 9/11 was a religious act.  And there has been no major movement whatsoever – either by the Western powers or by the movements within Islam itself – to confront the religious grounds of the totalitarian Islamists.

And the reason is because we have nothing to confront them with.  Secular humanists/atheists have undermined public religious expression at every turn, while cultural relativists have contextualized religion in such a way to strip it of any spiritual power whatsoever.  Now when we truly need true spiritual power to confront the demonic power motivating radical Islam, basically all we’ve got is allegorical dirt clods.

In the sphere of Islam, jihadists have the superior Qu’ranic argument that it is THEY who are carrying out Muhammad’s vision for Islam, not the liberal Westernized contextualizers who want to make very clear claims of Muhammad into metaphors and allegories representing something else.  Muhammad was a man of genuine violence; he had been in some thirty military campaigns in his life; he had committed numerous genocidal campaigns against “infidels”; and he had another thirty military campaigns planned at the time of his death, including the conquest of Western Europe as the means to spread Islam (“submission”) and the call of Allahu Akbar (a comparative which means “Allah is greater”).  If Muhammad is in any way, shape or form a representative paradigm of what it means to be “Muslim,” then the jihadists are right.

And liberalism – whether it be religious/theological or political/cultural liberalism – has exactly what to answer that?  Other than mocking or trivializing it?

Did political liberals – like the liberal rabbis from the LA Times article above – truly believe that we overcome the threat of terrorism by simply changing the name to “overseas contingency operation” from “war on terror”?

As bad as the religion of Allah may be for a free society, it has a great deal of force when the competition is cultural nothingness, the decaying leftovers of “salad bar pseudo-Judeo-Christianity.”

Notice I point out I’d argued this many times before, but I just don’t have the time to go back and search for my earliest argument for the fact that ignoring the very clearly Islamic tie to terrorism is and has been a giant mistake and that we cannot win if we don’t understand why our enemy keeps wanting to see us spitting blood as they jubilantly cut our heads off.

And Bush was also fundamentally wrong in his insistence that bringing “democracy” to the Middle East would make that region a better place given the simple fact that bad people will vote in a bad way.  I’ll simply put it in the words of founding father James Madison who said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”  And I’ll further point out that while Islam might be “religious” it is NOT “moral” by any Judeo-Christian standard that values human dignity and freedom.  It is no accident that while democracy emerged out of Judeo-Christianity and every single “Christian” nation has become a democracy, not one single Islamic country has EVER become a democracy in the 1,500 year history of Islam.  Asking Muslims to create a democratic republic is like asking elephants to build a space ship.  Neither is going to happen without a massive transformation in either the elephant or the Muslim.

So I just want to point out for the factual record that I don’t CARE what Bush said.  BUSH WAS WRONG.  I said it YEARS ago back when it mattered.  I said it before Obama’s horrible, godawful foreign policy that made Bush’s look like the greatest thing since sliced bread had the wheels completely fall off and we started watching in horror as Obama has since kept trying to drag the wheel-less cart by sheer undying moral idiocy rather than simply admit he was wrong.

Here are a number of article titles I came across while I was searching for the above quote that highlight rather key differences between Bush and Obama and conservatives and liberals:

On the article from the liberal “journalist” who wishes a terrorist had been a conservative tea party member, let’s just realize how COMMON that vile attitude is among liberals.  Samual L. Jackson, actor, liberal and demonic turd, just got through telling the world that when he heard about the San Bernardino terror attack, his very first thought was “how much I really wanted that to just be another, you know, crazy white dude, and not really some Muslims.”  Because like ALL Democrats he is a pathological RACIST BIGOT who hates Americans and therefore lives in an alternate reality where it is the American white people he so despises who are guilty of all the sins in the world.  He goes on to label the sort of people who just murdered 14 human beings as ” the new young black men.”

No, don’t be comparing Obama to Bush or Democrat-fool foreign policy to Republicans.  Just DON’T.  You damn hypocrite liars.  You damn and damnable liberals are SO wrapped up and enmeshed in the Muslim Monsters who are trying to murder us it makes me sick.  You both want the same damn thing: the State worshipped as God and the people trampled upon as they are compelled to do your bidding by force.

Also keep in mind that President George W. Bush PREDICTED the meltdown in Iraq if a future fool were to try to undo what Bush had at great cost managed to finally do:

“I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.” — President Bush, 2007

Which is EXACTLY what happened because our Fool-in-Chief began his fool presidency doing the following:

US-IRAQ: Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision
By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 2009 (IPS) – CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus, supported by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, tried to convince President Barack Obama that he had to back down from his campaign pledge to withdraw all U.S. combat troops from Iraq within 16 months at an Oval Office meeting Jan. 21.

But Obama informed Gates, Petraeus and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen that he wasn’t convinced and that he wanted Gates and the military leaders to come back quickly with a detailed 16-month plan, according to two sources who have talked with participants in the meeting.

Obama’s decision to override Petraeus’s recommendation has not ended the conflict between the president and senior military officers over troop withdrawal, however. There are indications that Petraeus and his allies in the military and the Pentagon, including Gen. Ray Odierno, now the top commander in Iraq, have already begun to try to pressure Obama to change his withdrawal policy.

A network of senior military officers is also reported to be preparing to support Petraeus and Odierno by mobilising public opinion against Obama’s decision.

Petraeus was visibly unhappy when he left the Oval Office, according to one of the sources. A White House staffer present at the meeting was quoted by the source as saying, “Petraeus made the mistake of thinking he was still dealing with George Bush instead of with Barack Obama.”

So don’t EVER let ANY Democrat cite Obama now.

Bush didn’t do that.  Bush warned AGAINST doing that.  It was OBAMA who foolishly abandoned Iraq against every single one of his generals’ recommendations and them demonically and deceitfully tried to blame it on Bush and on a status of forces agreement that had NOTHING to do with Obama’s stupid decision-making.

Bush WON the war in Iraq: Vice President Joe Biden claimed that fact, saying:

“I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government,” said Biden.

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  Barack Obama claimed that fact, claiming in 2009 “an Iraq that is sovereign, stable, and self-reliant.”

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  Even Bush’s terrorist enemies acknowledged it by saying in their radio transmissions that were intercepted, “We are defeated, don’t send any more foreign fighters.”

Bush WON the war in Iraq.  OBAMA LOST IT BECAUSE OBAMA IS A WICKED FOOL.

Terrorism has EXPLODED under Obama by EVERY metric you want to use.  Deaths from terrorism have already QUADRUPLED under Obama; and the wicked fool’s still got over a year left that we can already see are going to be so much worse it’s not even REAL.  Realize that in the first five years of Obama’s failed rule, terrorism exploded 150 percent.   But that’s NOTHING because terrorism under Obama exploded by ANOTHER 81 percent just last year alone.  How do you think 2015 is going to look, you Democrat FOOL???

Because Barack Obama is the most demon-possessed FOOL who has EVER LIVED, we are now seeing the worst refugee crisis in the entire recorded history of planet earth.

No, Barack Obama is NOTHING like George Bush.

And the Democrat Party is the party of Satan himself.  And Satan is laughing and laughing and maniacally laughing as evil EXPLODES because he owns the soul of every single Democrat.  And that is why these sodomy-worshiping baby butchering Marxists are one day going to share Satan’s ultimate eternal destiny.

So just to recap, Democrats who demonically, treacherously and in fact treasonously betrayed and back-stabled their commander-in-chief and the troops they had voted to authorized to fight under him before they abandoned their duty are cowards and liars of the very lowest sort to now try to argue that they are the ones who are the true bearers of Bush’s mantle.

 

Meet The REAL ‘Best Recruiter’ For ISIS: Hillary Clinton (I Am So Beyond Sick Of This ‘PLEASE Don’t Offend Muslims!’ PC Poop)

December 23, 2015

During the last debate Hillary Clinton said some flat-out lies.  Here was one of the winners that even the leftist-oriented Politifact ruled to be downright FALSE:

“We also need to make sure that the really discriminatory messages that Trump is sending around the world don’t fall on receptive ears,” Clinton said during the debate. “He is becoming ISIS’s best recruiter. They are going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists.”

In their very final words under “Our Ruling” they conclude:

Clinton said that ISIS is “going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists.”

We were unable to find any evidence to support this. The Clinton campaign did not provide any evidence that this is already happening — only that it could be happening, or that it may in the future. If ISIS was using Trump for recruitment videos, we would expect a frenzy of media coverage over it. We rate this claim False.

Okay, so Hillary LIED (again).  You can just shrug your shoulders and say, “What else is new?  The second hand spins around the clock and Hillary Clinton lies every time it moves.  But this particular lie fits a leftist narrative that desperately needs to be exposed and demonized once-for-all for the sake of our very national survival.

First of all, let’s keep going on the massive, appalling hypocrisy of Hillary Clinton’s lie that Donald Trump is somehow a recruiting tool for ISIS and that is a terrible thing.  Hey, let’s assume that Hillary is actually telling the truth (I know, we should trust a diarrhea fart while wearing white pants more than anything Hillary says) about Donald Trump being a recruiting tool for jihadists.  Let’s see who ELSE fits that illustrious company of the “offended ISIS” hall of shame:

While there is no Islamic State video featuring Donald Trump, ironically Islamic State does use videos featuring Bill Clinton as a recruitment tool.

Image credit: Live Leak Video

Image credit: Live Leak Video

His image is used on Islamic State videos to represent the immorality of America – a place where the president has sex in the oval office with his intern. Islamic State calls Hillary’s husband “the Fornicator-in-Chief.”

How embarrassing to Hillary. It’s just lucky Islamic State doesn’t know about all the rumors and charges that Bill sexually harassed and even raped women and traveled three times to “Orgy Island” to visit his friend Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender. All of those charges make Hillary’s husband one of the greatest recruiting tools in Islamic State history.

Okay, so oops.  The only recruiting tool we find IS HER OWN DAMN HUSBAND AND BELOVED DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT.  And Bill Clinton isn’t the “best recruiter” for ISIS because of his warlike stance against Muslims or his harsh rhetoric; nope; he’s their best recruiter because he was a morally-depraved sex offender.  Which ought to communicate volumes about just what a great recruiting tool the Democrat Party is in their radical and evil imposition of homosexual perversion upon America.

But let’s return to Trump for a moment, since Hillary wants that so much.

Trump the insult dog mocked Hillary Clinton from that very same debate leaving at the commercial break and then showing up well after the debate resumed: “Where did she go?”

I don’t know.  Maybe she was going on her very favorite jihadi sites and desperately fact-checking ISIS videos?

You’ve got to love liberals demonizing Trump for calling out what they say is such an illegitimate and trivial thing.  You know, like when Democrats mocked and demonized Marco Rubio for drinking water last year.  You’ve got to just love the demon-possessed left when somebody takes a page from their roach play book and they whine about it.  But hey, Democrat: if you can mock somebody for drinking too much water, we can surely mock somebody for what they do after they drink too much damn water.

But I digress.  Let me refocus on the fundamental issue here: being a recruiting tool for ISIS and how awful that supposedly therefore is.

Do you have ANY idea what would be the ULTIMATE recruiting tool for ISIS?  Let me tell you in three words:

A WOMAN PRESIDENT.

Women, according to the Islam that Democrats say is so peaceful and so wonderful, are supposed to look like this:

Let me contrast this traditional Islamic view of women with tree-hugging environmentalist Democrat women from uber-liberal UC Berkeley University:

Tree-Hugging Liberal Naked Women

Let’s play “Where’s Waldo?”  Can you spot the object in the above picture that might offend Muslims?

I mean, where are you hijabs, girls?  And you came from a college where you were studying like only a man ought to be allowed to do?  And I KNOW you didn’t drive a car to get to that tree you’re hugging!

And you cockroach hypocrite Democrat fascists who are SO afraid of “offending Muslims” never gave so much as ONE NANOSECOND of thought to offending Christians with your “Piss Christ” and your “Holy Virgin Mary” and all the other cultural affronts that you have so routinely punched us in the face with.  Oh, no, we were just people to marginalize and demonize by Obama.  Why is that, you hypocrites without shame, without honor, without decency, without any kind of integrity or virtue?

Why is it that your cockroach values honor an incredibly violent warmonger like Mohammad but continually demonize the followers of Jesus who prophesied, “If they hate you, know that they hated Me first.”

I’m not just talking about “ISIS” here, either: I am talking about Muslims in damn near ANY Muslim country such as our “dear friends” in Saudi Arabia.

So allow me to point out that a woman president would be the ULTIMATE INSULT to Islam.  Just as a woman Secretary of State was a naked insult to a religion that really doesn’t want women showing their damn ankles, driving a car, getting an education, being allowed to vote, being allowed to testify that they were just raped, let alone wielding political power over them.

You want to give Muslims something to “radicalize” over?  You want to be “ISIS’ best recruiter”?  I’ll tell you how YOU can do it, Democrat: vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And while you’re at it, if you’re a Democrat woman, put on your damn clothes, put on your full hijab, drop out of school, stop driving your damn car (which your religion of environmentalism also ought to make you do, hypocrite!) and stay locked up in your house unless you have a male relative who will accompany you.  Because if you don’t do ALL of these things, welcome to the hall of shame of those who serve as “ISIS’ best recruiter.”

Hey, here’s another image: can you see what might offend Islam here?:

Obama White House lights up to celebrate gay marriage - Copy

Gosh, I can’t spot a darn thing.  Oh, wait: Islam very specifically condemns homosexuality and calls for the death of homosexuals and anyone who condones it.  You know, like Obama.  Like Hillary Clinton.

So, hypocrite liberal, if you haven’t stoned a homosexual today, YOU ARE ISIS’ BEST RECRUITER.

I think about pornography and the liberal judges refusing to censor it.  Pornography has now utterly EXPLODED on the internet and the spirit of pornography is a vicious slap in the face to ANYONE who in any way, shape or form harbors any kind of moral or religious values.

You don’t think your porn radicalizes Muslims, Democrat???

Or how about this one, liberal.  A Muslim cleric once pointed out:

When you see some people here dressed in American-style clothes, you are seeing the bullets of the West.”

WHO is making those clothes, liberal?  Are you truly so damn demon-possessed that you think REPUBLICANS are pumping out and pimping Hollywood culture???

Everything you do, liberal, EVERYTHING you do, Democrat, is a bullet aimed at Islam.  And they are shooting back at your version of “Piss Christ” poured on them in the form of your God-damned “values.”

My point here is very simple, Democrat: if it is such a horrifying thing to in any way insult Islam or offend Muslims, etc., THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP DOING IT???

Personally, I don’t give one flying RIP about offending Islam.  But then again, I am not a vile, cockroach hypocrite like every single Democrat on planet earth is, either.

There are values that are worth standing up for against anyone or anything.

If Muslims want to get offended by my values, then allow me to let this little kitty speak for how I feel.

Because unlike Democrats, I am actually capable of the moral virtue of CONSISTENCY.  I don’t demonize people for doing something while I’m doing it about a thousand times worse at the very moment I’m demonizing them for doing what I’m doing.

I have pointed out the FACT – the blatant HISTORIC FACT – that Islam has a pathological problem with violence.  We desperately need to confront Islam and Muslims on that FACT.

If we do not deal with the RELIGIOUS GROUNDS for the violence that is pouring out of Islam, we will NEVER have ANYTHING but unending war that will last beyond the dust that our Western civilization will become.  We HAVE to call out the TRUTH and be willing to STAND for that truth and FIGHT for it.

Or we need to surrender, to bear our heads to the scimitar, to welcome sharia law as our governing authority.

Which do you prefer?

You Democrats are ROACHES.  You sit there and whine and slander me because I’m “offending Muslims” and “radicalizing” them and “giving ISIL what they want.”

Terrorism has SKYROCKETED under Obama and his Democrat policies of craven cowardice.  President George W. Bush wisely predicted what would happen if a fool like Obama was elected and what Bush predicted has come to passTerrorism deaths have QUADRUPLED under Obama and when the statistics come out next year they will easily more than have QUINTUPLED.  We just saw more US soldiers murdered by terrorists in Afghanistan – Obama’s response being to go golfing AGAIN – and US military deaths in Afghanistan had ALREADY skyrocketed under Obama because Obama emboldened the enemy with a plan for withdrawal (surrender).  At home, the very mass shootings Obama keeps demagoguing have skyrocketed 700% under his ROACH rule.  Obama has proven that “ISIS’ best recruiter” is WEAKNESS and lack of resolve before Islamic terrorism and the religious values that inspire it.

Hey, you turds: if Islamic State wants me to condemn Islam because it helps them recruit they just as much want YOU to serve as the ultimate recruiting tool by offending everything that Islam stands for with your perverted leftist “values.”

So for the sake of everything that has any integrity whatsoever, please either stop bitching about this “ISIS’ best recruiter” crap or abolish the Democrat Party as the ultimate insult to Islam that it is.

Me, I’m going to keep standing up for the truth, and for what is truly right.  And I frankly don’t care who I offend while I’m at it.

 

 

 

 

 

Islam’s ONLY Hope For True Reform Comes From A Surprising Source. And What Of America’s Only Hope For Reform?

December 17, 2015

I’ve recently been contemplating the Qur’an and the pathological tendency toward violence within Islam.  And I’ve been contemplating how morally idiotic liberals irrationally and continually pronounce Islam as “a peaceful religion” when they would NEVER say the same thing about biblical Christianity given the Bible’s blatantly clear stances of abortion, homosexuality and socialism.

Is Islam a religion of peace?  Is Mars a planet with breathable atmosphere?  No and no, with both deserving a “No, stupid” delivered with suitable incredulous and condescending stare.

I’ve made the points recently: both the Bible and the Qur’an contain commands to violence and death.  Here’s an article from a decidedly liberal (i.e., hostile to Judeo-Christianity) perspective about the Bible being even MORE violent than the Qur’an in the eyes of progressive liberalism.  Penn State religious history professor Philip Jenkins launched his own “investigation” of the Bible vis a vis the Qur’an and concluded, “”Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible.”

And of course everyone is agonizingly aware of the ten top Christian terrorist organizations inflicting mass death in tens of thousands of terror attacks.  Oh, wait, they’re not, BECAUSE THERE AREN’T ANY CHRISTIAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS the way we’ve suffered al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Taliban,  al-Shabaab, Hezbollah, Hamas, Ansar al-Sharia, al-Nusra, Muslim Brotherhood, etc., etc.

It’s just a complete mystery to liberals why a “religion of peace” like Islam is inspiring so much terror and hate and violence.  When they believe with ever fiber of their being that it ought to be the Christianity that they so despise that is the true source of all the violence.

Let’s consider this leftist professor’s claims and see if they are actually true.  I’ll begin with the Bible and proceed to expose a critical fact that Jenkins leaves entirely out of his false comparison.

Yes, the God of the Bible, in judgment of sin, commands the Israelites to wipe out and exterminate the inhabitants of the land He is giving His people.  God gives Abraham’s descendants through Isaac the Promised Land.  Shortly before Abraham dies, God tells Abraham this:

 “As for you, you shall go to your fathers in peace; you will be buried at a good old age.  Then in the fourth generation they will return here, for the iniquity of the Amorite is not yet complete.” — Genesis 15:15-16.

Understand that God had already promised Abraham this land that belonged to another people in Genesis 12.  In the very passage I just quoted for you from Genesis 15, God immediately after verses 15-16 proceeds to specifically define the boundaries of the Promised Land that He just promised:

On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates–the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites.” — Genesis 15:18-21

So God tells Abraham, “I am giving you THIS land, land that other peoples are currently on.  But not YET.  God’s promise unfolds throughout Genesis chapter 15. Look at the unfolding context:

  • 7He also said to him, “I am the LORD, who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to take possession of it.”
  • 13Then the LORD said to him, “Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated there.
  • 14But I will punish the nation they serve as slaves, and afterward they will come out with great possessions.
  • 15You, however, will go to your ancestors in peace and be buried at a good old age.
  • 16In the fourth generation your descendants will come back here, for the sin of the Amorites has not yet reached its full measure.”
  • 18On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates–
  • 19the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites,
  • 20Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites,
  • 21Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites.”

The Book of Genesis records Israel being invited into Egypt by a grateful Pharaoh but ultimately being cruelly enslaved by a subsequent Pharaoh.  And just as God had foretold to Abraham, Israel would spend 400 years in bondage as slaves.  But the Israelites were finally delivered through Moses.  And they came in and took the land that God had promised them.  And God gave them this land after having given the wicked people who inhabited it 400 years to get their moral acts together.

God tells the Israelites under the command of Moses’ successor Joshua to wipe out these peoples (i.e., the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites).  In Deuteronomy 20:16-18 God commands:

16“Only in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall not leave alive anything that breathes. 17But you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittite and the Amorite, the Canaanite and the Perizzite, the Hivite and the Jebusite, as the LORD your God has commanded you, 18 so that they may not teach you to do according to all their detestable things which they have done for their gods, so that you would sin against the LORD your God.…

This theme – and the reason behind it – is repeated several times by God in the Old Testament, as Numbers 33:55 demonstrates:

‘But if you do not drive out the inhabitants of the land, those you allow to remain will become barbs in your eyes and thorns in your sides. They will give you trouble in the land where you will live.

So in these passages we have the commandment and we also have the REASON FOR the commandment: if Israel destroys its enemies and wipes them out, they will not be corrupted.  If they refuse or fail to wipe out their enemies, then the very same evil that brought God’s judgment on their enemies will enter into Israel and God will have to bring judgment upon THEM.

Which, for the record, is ultimately precisely what happened to Israel as is declared in numerous biblical passages.  We find in 1 Samuel 15:17-24 a simple statement that Israel refused to obey God’s commands.  They didn’t drive out these wicked peoples, who ultimately morally contaminated them and perverted the righteous culture God commanded them to create where previously only the wicked cultures of the Amorite, Jebusite, etc. had been.

Because Israel did NOT drive out the wicked peoples who inhabited the land God gave them according to God’s command, Israel became just as wicked if not MORE wicked than those people as their evil ways contaminated Israel’s culture:

But the people did not listen. Manasseh led them astray, so that they did more evil than the nations the LORD had destroyed before the Israelites. — 2 Kings 21:9

Habakkuk chapter one records the people becoming evil and the LORD raising up the Babylonians to judge them.

And so just as God used the Israelites as His weapon against the wicked peoples who inhabited the land that God gave to Israel, so God used the mighty Gentile nations such as the Egyptians, the Assyrians and the Babylonians against Israel.  God is sovereign over the nations, and He providentially uses them to ultimately accomplish His will.  And in His sovereign providence He uses the righteous and the wicked alike.

Israel was first subjugated by Gentile powers and ultimately after rejecting their Messiah ceased to exist for two millennia until God, in fulfillment of His word through Ezekiel, literally resurrected the nation back from the “dry bones” of the dead.  And in miraculous fulfillment of Isaiah 66:8 – “Who has ever heard of such things? Who has ever seen things like this? Can a country be born in a day or a nation be brought forth in a moment? Yet no sooner is Zion in labor than she gives birth to her children” – Israel was born in a day when the United Nations officially and historically declared her existence on May 14, 1948.  This was in direct response out of international outrage over the world having allowed six million Jews to be slaughtered in the Holocaust.

Liberals may not like it because they hate the God of the Bible, His righteousness, and His sovereignty over the nations when they yearn for a totalitarian socialist global new world order that exalts itself far above the God of the Bible.

God is sovereign over the nations.  Liberals despise Him for that; they want a world where the nation – the totalitarian human government – is sovereign over God.  They want a world where they dictate to God and to mankind what is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is evil.  But I digress.

We have seen up to this point that in a violent world, God not only condoned but actually commanded His people Israel to employ the same violence that all the other people were employing.

BUT… we ultimately come to a critical turning point in the Bible: we come to the promise of a New Covenant.  The Old Testament itself affirms a coming New Covenant:

31 Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. 33 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”Jeremiah 31:31-34

Hebrews 8:6-13 also affirms that this New Covenant has been fulfilled in Christ Jesus.

During the Last Supper Jesus said:

19And when He had taken some bread and given thanks, He broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” 20And in the same way He took the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in My blood.”  — Luke 22:19-21

Hebrews 9:15 states, “For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance–now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.”

So we have a progression in both Testaments of the Bible from the Old Covenant to a New Covenant.  And the New Covenant is literally and even physically embodied in the Word, Messiah Jesus.

And what is it that Jesus taught?  What did He command?  Violence?  No, the Virgin-born fulfillment of Isaiah 9:6 came to be “the Prince of peace.”  And Jesus taught even as He was being led away to be viciously flogged and then crucified, “Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.”

Liberals completely fail to comprehend this: the Bible begins with violence and moves to peace.

Not so the Qur’an.  Not so Muhammad.  When you read a Qur’an, understand that “Muhammad was like two different persons at two different times and the Quran is like two contradictory books pasted together.”  Understand that in Islam you have 1390 Years of Violence and only 10 years of Peace.

When Mohammad first began to proselytize his new religion in Mecca and claim that he was receiving revelations from Allah, he was decidedly the underdog.  And correspondingly all of his revelations centered around peaceful coexistence and tolerance.

But then Mohammad went to Medina in what is today called “Al Hijra.”  He was able to garner followers and became militarily powerful.  And suddenly all of the revelations of his Qur’an took a decidedly violent turn.

The Qur’an was NOT organized in any kind of chronological order; rather, it was organized by length, from the longest to the shortest suras.

When you re-arrange the Qur’an by chronology, you get this order: and you get not violence to peace as the Holy Bible gives, but peace to VIOLENCE.

So, for example, do your own research.  Consider the very first violent Sura 2:191-193 found in the Qur’an which states, And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killingbut if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”.  And lo and behold, when you examine the chronological order and look to the right column to see where it was organized according to the tradition based on length of sura, you find that this edict found in Sura 2 to “kill them wherever you may find them” is the VERY FIRST sura Mohammad conveniently claimed he received from Allah when he arrived in Medina and became the dominant power. 

This is not merely a command for violence; it is a UNIVERSAL COMMAND for violence.  I’ll talk about that more.

Keep going down the list of violent suras and look at where they are found, whether they were written earlier in Mohammad’s Mecca phase or later when he arrived at Medina and became militarily powerful.

You will find that without any question, the vast overwhelming majority of violent sura that commanded violence and death were given in Medina just as the vast overwhelming majority of suras commanding any kind of “peace” was given in Mecca.

A simple historic statement of fact: Mohammad and the Qur’an takes us from peace to viciousness and hate and murder and death and slaughter.

Now, this is bad, but it actually gets WORSE.  Because Islam has a doctrine called “abrogation” by which later suras correct and supercede earlier ones.

In other words, if Mohammad first said “peace” and then he said “war,” the ONLY correct interpretation of the Qur’an MUST BE WAR.

Now, abrogation is not necessarily such a terrible thing; every parent has done it: your child may ask you if she can go to a party, and then you find out something you don’t like about the party that makes you change or mind, or your child misbehaves and you say, “Now you can’t go.”  You’ve abrogated your previous statement.  You’ve said yes and now you’re saying no to the same thing you’d said yes to.  So if your child comes to you and says, “You said on Monday I could go, so I went,” you are enraged as you point out, “But I said on TUESDAY you could NOT go, so you are in a heap of trouble!”

It’s different when it comes to a revelation from God, though: God isn’t supposed to be caught by surprise or change His mind with new information or be wrong and then correct Himself.  How did Mohammad respond to this dilemma?  It seems that Qur’an 2:106 was “revealed” in response to skepticism directed at Muhammad that Allah’s revelations were not entirely consistent over time. Muhammad’s rebuttal was that ”Allah is able to do all things” — even change his mind.

And hence we have examples of blatantly obvious abrogation in the Qur’an such as:

In Surah 58, Al Mujadilah, verse 12, the believers are commanded to give alms before a private consultation with the Messenger. In verse 13 they are told that it is no longer necessary.

In Surah 33, Al Ahzab, verses 50-51 Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) is allowed to marry and divorce an unlimited number of women. In verse 52 he is prohibited to continue to do so.

In Surah 73, Al Muzzammil, verses 2-4, the prophet of Islam is commanded to spend about half of the night in prayer and reading of the Quran. In verse 20 of the same Surah this is changed into what is easy for him and those who followed his example.

But this Islamic view of Allah is in very direct contrast to the Judeo-Christian God of the Bible, and so we have passages like Numbers 23:19: “God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?

Sneering liberal pseudo-intellectuals claim that Christianity has the same issue of abrogation, BUT WE DON’T.  And they are frankly moral idiots of the very lowest order to make such a blatantly false claim.  Here’s why:

  1. In every single example of violence in the Old Testament, it is ALWAYS in EVERY CASE a specific command by God to a specific people to do a specific thing at a specific time for a specific reason.  There is NO universalized commandment by God to always kill everyone the way we see in the Qur’an, no “kill them wherever you find them.”  There are no verses in the Bible that say “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you…” (Qur’an 2:216), no “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah” (Qur’an 4:76).  God never gives a universal command that He later has to take back.
  2. If the Bible were given the same way the Qur’an is given, Moses would have commanded peace and Jesus would have come after Moses and subsequently taught, “But I tell you, hate your enemies and slaughter those who persecute you.”  When Jesus, in fulfillment of the New Covenant that even the Old Covenant itself anticipated hundreds of years before Jesus’ arrival on earth, as the Prince of Peace, actually taught, “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44).  You need to comprehend how absolutely MASSIVE is the difference between a religion that begins with violence and then moves to peace (Christianity) verses a religion that begins with peace and then ends with commands to universalized violence.
  3. The Bible pointedly “abrogates” ITSELF in terms of violence because it promises a New Covenant and then it DELIVERS one in the form of the Prince of Peace, Jesus.  The “abrogation” of violence was not for the sake of Jesus’ convenience, the way the abrogation of peace for a call to violence clearly was politically oh-so-very convenient for Mohammad.  Let me put it this way: Jesus told Peter, “Put away your sword” (Matthew 26:52) in order that He could be arrested and beaten and go to the cross where He would die a terrible, humiliating, agonizing death in our place for our sins.  Versus Mohammad who said let’s be peaceful when he was the underdog and then turned on a dime and ordered mass violence the moment his forces gained the upper hand.
  4. The Bible doesn’t “abrogate” violence merely because times had changed and the world was no longer a violent place and the Bible was correcting a problem that was obviously out of step with the rest of the world.  Any such notion is simply FALSE.  The Romans at the time of Christ were as vicious and brutal as ANYONE ever had been; what they did to Jesus itself proves that.  And Jesus’ disciples wrote the New Testament not only in light of what Rome had done to Jesus, but in light of the fact that even as they were writing, Rome was treating Christians viciously.  St. Peter and St. Paul were both executed by Rome, as were many other disciples.
  5. The God of the Bible is a God of wrath just as He is a God of love.  But all of His attributes are perfectly balanced, such that His wrath is manifested in the attribute of justice that ultimately flows from love.  And the toleration of evil results in a lack of justice.  And so God gave His people the sword and used them as an instrument in defined, limited circumstances and only in accordance with His command.  But ultimately He was always preparing for the arrival of His Son, the Prince of Peace.
  6. Finally, the thing that changed in the Bible was this: “But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship” (Galatians 4:4-5).  God prophesied a coming Messiah who would epitomize and usher in a “new covenant,” and Jesus came as foretold.
  7. And so Jesus completely fulfilled the Old Covenant (Matthew 5:17).  The various laws and regulations and customs of the Old Testament weren’t “abrogated,” but rather they were fulfilled and served their purpose and were no longer necessary because the promised Messiah took their burden off our necks.  And so Christians have realized even in the time of St. Peter that unless a principle or a command from the Old Covenant is specifically repeated/restated in the New Covenant, it was fulfilled by Christ and no longer applies to New Covenant believers.  We can compare the Old Covenant and the New to the abacus vs. the computer or the horse vs. the automobile: the former things weren’t “abrogated” and declared wrong; rather they served their purpose and we now use the superior things.  Christ is the Superior which fulfilled the inferior and the inferior that served as a type or a shadow (see for example Colossians 2:17Hebrews 8:5) of the Superior is therefore no longer needed.

It is for this reason that I point out the fact and hereby state for the historical record that Penn State religious history professor Philip Jenkins is an abject moral idiot and the worst kind of intellectual fraud.  He is, as are all progressive liberals, a pathologically ignorant fool masquerading himself as someone who is wise and knowledgeable when he in fact teaches the precise opposite of wisdom and knowledge.  Jenkins is not only utterly blind to what is actually going on all around him in the real world as Muslim terrorists murder and bomb innocent people in the name of Allah, but as I have just proven he is just as utterly blind to the religious theology that he claims that he is an expert in.

A passage from Colossians sums these liberal fools up well: “Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.” – Colossians 2:8.  Tragically, modern universities teach very little BUT “empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense.”

The fact that the Qur’an does NOT begin with violence and then end with peace, but rather the opposite, and the fact that abrogation forces true Muslims to accept that the later “revelations” to Mohammad supercede previous ones, puts Islam in a deep, dark pit of endless violence that is NOT true of Christianity.

Which is why Christianity and Christ are attacked all the damn TIME by liberals and Christians don’t unleash waves of violent hate the way Muslims routinely do the moment they even THINK their Prophet might be getting insulted.

We are left with a giant problem of Islam: we find that Islam, Mohammad and the Qur’an spent ten years deceiving people by preaching peace and tolerance in order to grow strong and powerful, and then the rest of history practicing force and violence and terror the moment they were able to gain the upper hand.

We find that Islam does NOT mean “peace” as liberals love to adoringly say; it means “submission.”  AND YOU WILL SUBMIT OR ELSE YOU WILL BE KILLED.

A historical study of Mohammad’s life reveals that the “Prophet of Peace” had fought in over thirty violent military campaigns and had at least another thirty campaigns planned at the time of his death in 632 AD.  In fact I can quote you Islamic sources that state, “that the Prophet waged jihad operations 77 times in the first 10 years as head of the Muslim community in Medina.”  But it is a fact of history that when Mohammad showed up at Medina, he became a violent terrorist warmonger who waged unrelenting war until he defeated and subjugated everyone around him.  What you will also find is that Islam did NOT practice peace after Mohammad’s death; in fact it split due to terrifying, graphic and vicious violence that continues to this very day as the viciousness created Sunni and Shiite Islam.  But within 100 years of Mohammad’s death, warring, violent Muslims were attacking Christian Europe and had killed an looted and pillaged their way all across the entirety of Europe before finally being crushed by Charles “the Hammer” Martel at the Battle of Tours in France in 732.  Violent warring Muslims had already poured across Africa and seized the Christian realms established by St. Augustine.  All of the vast peaceful Christian provinces of North Africa had fallen to the bloody sword of Allah by 711.  Violent, warring Muslims poured into Christian Spain to be finally defeated by El Cid.  Violent, warring Muslims poured into the Christian Byzantine Empire and besieged Constantinople and the Christian Emperor pleaded with the Pope to send Christian warriors to defend a Christian realm from Muslim conquest in what became known as the Crusades.

The United States of America, from its infancy, almost immediately came into contact with violent, warring Islam as the violent, warring Muslims from the Islamic Barbary States began a vicious campaign against the United States.  So we had ten years of “peace” and yes, fourteen centuries of violence and war.

The ONLY thing in history that has stopped Islam from violence against their “infidel” neighbors is raw military power and the Muslims’ naked fear of the “infidels'” willingness to use it.

The Muslims who are attacking us are doing nothing more than reading their Qur’ans in light of the life of their moral and spiritual paradigm, their Prophet, Mohammad.  Their lives are matching his teachings, and that is why they are “killing us wherever they may find us.”

Jesus, by contrast, never harmed anyone.  He was the Lamb of God who never harmed anyone or ever commanded anyone to ever harm anyone.  Jesus is the antithesis of Mohammad.

If you want peace, there is ultimately one one place and one Person to go to: to the foot of the Cross, to the feet of Jesus, who came to allow violence to prevail so He could ultimately prevail against all violence when He returns as King of kings and Lord of lords.

So, how then do you reform Islam?  If you have any honesty or intelligence, you ought to see the nearly insurmountable difficulty by now.

There is only one possible way and it is interesting where it is found:

It is found in the Qur’an itself.

What you have to do is go to one interesting and frankly incredibly embarrassing period for Muslims: when Mohammad received his “Satanic Verses.”

Here are a couple of links to understand what is going on from Answering Islam (another here) and from Muhammadanism.  But here’s what happened in a historic nutshell: while Mohammad was in Medina (his “peaceful” period), he was weak and had few followers.  He was estranged from even his own tribe.  And he had a “revelation” that it was okay for his followers to acknowledge and affirm the existence of three pagan goddesses alongside Allah: Lat, Uzza, and Manat.  When the inhabitants of Mecca heard Muhammad’s confession of the ancient goddesses inside the Ka’aba, they immediately revoked the ban they had placed on him and gave his movement political breathing room.  But the moment he was able to become strong enough to rescind his confession, he took it back by claiming that while he had believed it had come from Allah, it had actually come from Satan.  And so he went back on his confession because what he had put in the Qur’an as a revelation from Allah had actually come from Satan.  Hence the title, “the Satanic verses.”

I’m just going to say it: the ONLY hope for Islam in terms of any meaningful reform into a religion of actual peace is for Islam to affirm that the ENTIRE Medina portion of the Qur’an came from Satan.

It is a simple and undisputable fact of history that Mohammad HIMSELF took back part of his Qur’an and claimed it had actually been from Satan; ultimately, Muslims are going to have to take back a much bigger chunk of it and recognize that every violent sura came from the same Satan.

Mohammad himself acknowledged that Satan could enter into him and alter his revelation.  Run with it.

But what of the United States?  What is our only hope for reform?

Another fact of history to point out is that the United States actually has some powerful experience with dealing with fanatic death cults.  We faced one called “Imperial Japan.”  Believe it or not, Muslims were NOT the first people to fly planes loaded with bombs into human-inhabited structures: think “Kamikaze pilots” during World War II: not merely hundreds but THOUSANDS of them.  3,860 Japanese Kamikaze pilots died as their explosives-laden planes either crashed into American ships or were shot down trying to do so.

Oh, yes, America has dealt with “suicide bombers” and the ideology that sent them at us before.  Do you understand me?  WE’VE DEALT WITH THIS KIND OF VICIOUS MENTALITY BEFORE.  And we did not prevail over it by adopting any modern liberal pile of inane Obama blathering drivel.

How we defeated that existential threat to freedom and peace is a matter of history.

The Japanese Imperial fascists were every BIT as much of a national death cult as what we are confronting now with Islam: but the United States of America stopped being “a sleeping giant” and woke up enough to unleash a violent jihad of our OWN and we BROKE THE NECK of that national death cult.

I remember the quote from the Japanese admiral who had planned the Pearl Harbor attack and then realized what he had done as America began to rise up in righteous anger:

I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve.” Japanese Admiral Yamamoto

Islam is NOT going to reform by itself.  Any more than the Japanese were going to reform by themselves.  They’re going to need some confrontation.  They are going to need to be confronted with reason and with truth and with fact and with their own history and they are going to need to be confronted with a terrible resolve to use all the power we can bring against them until they are forced to see reason as the Japanese were forced to see reason.

But that means that the United States needs to reform as well if it is going to survive.  We desperately need to manifest the same “terrible resolve” that we were able to find in the days of our greatness.

Pain can be an awesome tutor when it is combined with truth.  That is the only chance to drive even a fool to finally see reason and do the right thing.

Liberals are people with a pathological hatred of truth.  And so what they keep repeating in their condescending moral idiocy is that everyone ought to be just like them and ignore truth, ignore reason, ignore history, ignore reality and just follow the blatherings of Obama.

The TRUTH is that Islam has an inherent, intrinsic, pathological problem with violence.  Ultimately, the ONLY way through to any genuine peace is to make Islam recognize that truth and DEAL with it.  Any liberal notion that the path to peace is to ignore the truth, bury our head in the sand and hope the truth somehow goes away is another word for “suicide.”

Liberals tell us over and over again that to confront Islam, to associate it with terrorism, will “radicalize” the Islamic world.  But here’s the thing: every single time liberals affirm this proposition, what they are in fact acknowledging is their own belief that every single Muslim is hair-trigger psycho and all it will take is the slightest provocation, the littlest nudge, to send them over the edge of madness and into bloodbath jihad.  They acknowledge that the very Christianity they revile so is a FAR superior worldview to every other worldview including Islam, because it is only in Christianity that we can have peace even with our enemies as we follow the teachings of Jesus as true disciples.  Let’s get beyond “Piss Christ” (a crucifix of Christ placed in a jar of urine) and Ofili’s “Holy Virgin Mary” (a mockery of the Virgin Mary smearing her with dung and pornographic images); just imagine the response if a Barack Obama tried to impose homosexual marriage on a Muslim country and imagine every single Muslim willing to crawl over the dead bodies of their own family members so they could get to Obama and cut his head off for his blasphemy.  Or how about this one: why don’t you Democrats try forcing the American people to fund “Piss Prophet” with tax dollars the same way you imposed “Piss Christ” on us and see how crazy insane Muslims get?

You don’t DARE do that.  Why not? 

And the answer is: because the mere act of drawing a cartoon – and let me assure you that a cartoon is FAR less offensive than your filthy, vile, disgusting urine, liberal – is enough to set off the entire Islamic world into a murderous rage.

And the answer is: because you KNOW Christianity is the only true source of peace on earth – as much as you hate it.  Just as you KNOW Islam is the source of violence just waiting to explode regardless of your dishonest rhetoric about “the religion of peace.”

Every single time a liberal so much as mentions the possibility of “radicalizing” the Muslim community, they affirm the spirit of violent hate just waiting to be unleashed by a religion that is manifestly violent.  Nobody worries about “radicalizing” Christians because you know full bloody well we don’t act that way.  You fear Muslims “radicalizing” if you so much as breathe wrong because no matter how much you want to suppress reality, bury the truth, deep, deep down you know how very wrong you are.

Go ahead, be a good liberal and follow the liberal way of burying your head in the sand so you won’t have to deal with REALITY:

The Bible spoke of wicked Israel before its judgment.  Let it speak to us before ours as well:

You boast, “We have struck a bargain to cheat death and have made a deal to dodge the grave. The coming destruction can never touch us, for we have built a strong refuge made of lies and deception.” — Isaiah 28:15

And we’ll see how long you keep your fool heads attached to your bodies the moment these people get to you:

003

If you bury your head in the sand to reality, you might as well lose your head, you deserve to lose your head – and we now live in an age where lose it you surely will.

We absolutely cannot continue to ignore the true reality – and yes, the terrifying reality – that is Islam.  We have to confront them with the truth and force them to acknowledge that truth and embrace the change they must embrace.  Or we will surely be fighting until the end of the planet in nuclear Armageddon.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Ultimate Hero In the San Bernardino Terrorist Massacre Was Very Likely One Christian Man Who Called Out Islam For What It Is

December 4, 2015

From all I have watched and read, the experts in counter-terrorism were flat-out puzzled from the very outset as to why the terrorist couple would select the target they attacked, fire a couple of magazines, and then simply leave.  Because what we have previously seen in Islamist terror attacks is the terrorist shoot their way in and then stay until every single victim is murdered and they themselves are gunned down screaming “Allahu Akbar!”

It didn’t happen.  Instead, we’ve got a pair of terrorists entering a building, targeting only one specific room in that building, and then leaving.

Even before they were identified and killed, the experts were scratching their heads.  Something just didn’t fit.

Then, to make it even crazier, the authorities entered the home of the terrorist couple and literally found a giant bomb-making factory.  Bombs that were ready to use.  Bombs that were strapped to remote-controlled cars that they could drive to various targets (such as into crowds of cowering people) and then remotely detonate.

Everyone now agrees they had a far larger, and far deadlier, attack planned.  Which was their REAL target.

So the question becomes, what led them to go after that one small target and ultimately defeat the far larger and far deadlier attack they were clearly prepared to launch?

One fact that we now know may contain the answer:

San Bernardino shooting update: Friend of victim says heated exchange on Islam took place before rampage
KPCC staff
December 03, 03:06 PM

A friend of a man who was killed during Wednesday’s attack said she witnessed a fight between him and one of the attackers over religion.

Kuuleme Stephens told the Associated Press she overheard Farook and coworker Nicholas Thalasinos arguing over Islam when she called two weeks before the attack.

Thalasinos’ wife Jennifer Thalasinos told KPCC her husband was outspoken about radical Islam. She said her husband “did have a lot of anti-Muslim sentiment.”

“But again, he did get along with the person who caused all of this. He had friends who were Muslim,” she said. “He was very outspoken about how he felt. … He was anti-Muslim in the whole scheme of things just because everything has been so out of control with ISIS and Al-Qaeda and their anti-Semitic sentiment and with my husband being a Messianic Jew, that was a big issue with him.”

The Associated Press reports:

Kuuleme Stephens says she happened to call 52-year-old Nicholas Thalasinos while he was at work and having a discussion with Syed Farook.

Thalasinos identified Farook by name and told her Farook believed Islam was a peaceful religion.

She added that Farook said Americans don’t understand Islam.

Stephens says both men worked as county restaurant inspectors and regularly discussed politics and religion. Thalasinos identified as a Messianic Jew and was passionate about pro-Israel causes.

AP cautioned that it’s not yet clear if the argument had anything to do with the attack, but at a press conference Thursday, San Bernardino Police Chief Burguan confirmed that at least one witness said Farook had left the holiday gathering upset after some kind of dispute. Investigators have also been clear that they have found no motive yet for the attack.

I am just going to put it this way: I believe that Christian – and specifically that glorious Messianic Jew who had accepted the TRUE Messiah of Israel as his Savior and Lord – ultimately broke up that far bigger, far deadlier attack by confronting the vicious terrorist murderer who had hate and murder in his heart over the real nature of his false religion.

From what I am hearing now, it is at least quite possible that they were doing reconnaissance on a theatre in preparation for what would have been a far deadlier attack employing all of their massive explosive arsenal that would have likely killed HUNDREDS.

In a way, you almost have to laugh: a terrorist who is planning to unleash a vicious, murderous attack and kill as many innocent victims as possible, is actually arguing with somebody over whether or not the religion he is about to murder and massacre in the name of is “peaceful.”  When he literally embodies the fact that no, it is NOT peaceful!!!

Let’s acknowledge that there are obviously Muslims who would never do such a vicious thing.  And they may very well understand their religion – which means “submission” and NOT “peace”, for the record – does not permit such a vicious act in the name of Allah.  But let’s put those Muslims aside for the moment and focus on this one particular Muslim man who DID clearly believe that Islam permitted and even DEMANDED such acts of violence from true followers of Islam.

Syed Farook’s father said this of his terrorist son after he gunned down fourteen people and tried to murder something like twenty-one others:

“He was very religious. He would go to work, come back, go to pray, come back. He’s Muslim.”

There is absolutely no question that Syed Farook WAS a Muslim.  THE MAN MEMORIZED THE ENTIRE KORAN.  HE WENT TO MOSQUE TO PRAY TWICE A DAY.  Frankly, anybody who claims that Syed Farook was not a Muslim is NOT making a statement about Syed Farook or Islam; he or she is making a statement about his/her own incredible abject moral idiocy.  You are simply stating that you are absolutely pathologically incapable of perceiving reality no matter how obvious that reality is.

Okay, so this guy, Syed Farook, has a passionate argument with a Christian over the nature of Islam.  The Christian says Islam is NOT a religion of peace, but rather a religion of violence and hate.  Meanwhile, Syed Farook is actively plotting a violent, hateful act at the very time they’re having this argument.

But what does Syed Farook claim in his argument?  That the Christian who is clearly VERY right is wrong, and that the Islam Syed Farook is preparing to massacre in the name of is in fact actually a religion of peace.

It’s actually beyond insane.  It’s a demonic degree of blindness.

Just as the Christian Scriptures say:

The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. — 2 Corinthians 4:4

Just as the Christian Scriptures in the very Person of Jesus Himself says in relation to the character of those who are so blinded and therefore ultimately so sold out to Satan:

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. — John 8:44

I’m just going to flat-out state it for the factual historic record: you have a combination of blindness and deception.  Unbelief results in self-deception, which leads to spiritual blindness, which leads to the willingness to live a deceived and deceiving life.

Is Islam a religion of peace?  Not hardly.  Muhammad was a man of violence who had been in more than three dozen military campaigns as he killed his way to victory after victory.  And he had another three dozen planned at the time of his death.  One of those attacks that he had planned was ultimately carried out nearly a century after his death, when a giant Islamic invasion of Christian Europe was finally stopped all the way across the continent as Charles “the Hammer” Martel stopped and drove back Islam at the Battle of Tours in France.  Muhammad committed all manners of atrocities.  He committed genocide.  He enslaved people.  He commanded that people who did not believe in Islam be killed.

What many people simply fail to understand because the liberal education system refuses to teach them the truth is that there are basically TWO Korans: the Koran that Muhammad wrote when he was the underdog in Mecca and the Koran that Muhammad wrote AFTER Mecca when he was the superior military power in Medina.  As the underdog inferior power in Mecca, Muhammad preached tolerance and peace. But he was agitating all along, and was ultimately forced to flee. And then the moment he gained the upper hand, in Medina, he became a brutal butcher.

You need to understand – and the leftist academia system will never teach it to you – that Islam has a doctrine called “abrogation,” in which the LATER commands nullify and void the previous ones.  And the later verses call for WAR and VIOLENT JIHAD.  The Koran is an inherently self-refuting book that contradicts itself.  And that is because the Koran is largely a series of “convenient suras” in which Muhammad kept arbitrarily altering his religion whenever it suited his political or personal ambitions or desires.  He would invoke God to get whatever the hell he wanted.  And then he would invoke God again to nullify the previous invocation once he’d got what he wanted.  And without “abrogation” it is absolutely impossible to make any sense whatsoever out of the Koran.

Christians publish chronological Bibles that are presented in the historical order of when they were written and the periods they cover; I would LOVE to see somebody do that with the Koran.  It would be a rather shocking thing to see Muhammad turn on a dime to go from being an apostle of peace when it was convenient to a minister of war when it was convenient.  And I dare say the only fitting ink for such a book would be BLOOD, because genuine historical Islam is bathed in that fluid.

Liberals who rabidly despise God and the Bible might tell us that Christians practice “abrogation,” also.  I mean, the Old Testament both commands and condones acts of violence.  But here’s the thing: in the case of the Bible, the “abrogation” very clearly works the opposite direction of the Koran; the Bible goes from war to peace and ends with PEACE whereas the Koran goes from peace to war and ends with WAR.  Period.

Jesus died saying “Father, forgive them” and Muhammad died screaming for the blood of his enemies.

Muhammad’s final chapter was one of war, of violent jihad, of genocide, of hate.  And the doctrine of “abrogation” ABROGATES any notion of Islam as a “religion of peace.”

Except in the vacuous minds of deluded fools.  Which is why the Christian Scriptures warn us:

Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ. — Colossians 2:8

We have numerous “intellectuals” who believe NOTHING BUT empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense.  Belief in empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense is the zeitgeist of this age, more than any age that has ever come before it.

And that is made abundantly obvious when you consider the liberal view of “Islam” as “the religion of peace.”

I was leaving as a pair of attorneys for the TERRORIST Farook family took to the microphones and began to claim that the murderous San Bernardino terrorist attack had nothing to do with Islam.  They actually blamed the CHRISTIAN for the attack for basically inciting the Muslim by claiming that Islam isn’t a peaceful religion.  But, of course, on their distorted view, the Muslim who acted murderously because he felt his religion was being insulted somehow didn’t kill in the name of the religion he was “defending”???  Hello?  “Empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense.”  They told us we’d be wrong to associate Muslims with terrorism and then proceeded to do what they said was so wrong by repeatedly attempting to link Christians with terrorism.  It’s really pretty amazing, the level of pure hypocrisy liberals are capable of.  They’ll keep dredging up two or three attacks and compare them to the hundreds of THOUSANDS of Islam-inspired attacks like there’s some kind of equivalence.  I actually wish there WAS: THAT would mean that the dollar I had in my pocket was just like the BILLION dollars in Mark Zuckerberg’s pocket!!!  That’s the level of asininity of these people.  And then to make it worse, when you consider their “Christian terrorists,” such as Robert Lewis Dear who recently shot up a Planned Parenthood clinic, WHY THE HELL WOULD ANYONE CLAIM THESE GUYS ARE CHRISTIANS???  Dear NEVER went to any Christian church, never spoke about Jesus or God or religion.  Basically, what the left is saying is that the ONLY people who have any love in their hearts for children and AREN’T brutally indifferent to liberals’ selling baby parts like meat in a deli clearly have to be “Christian.”

In the same way, the left branded Timothy McVeigh a “Christian.” Again, employing twisted “logic” that would guarantee that Barack Obama truly IS a MUSLIM if the same standard were applied (which the pathologically hypocritical left would NEVER ever do).

So again, you’ve got this trivial handful of terror attacks that even the damn hateful LEFT can call “Christian,” versus hundreds of THOUSANDS of terror attacks committed by people who very proudly screamed out their “Allahu akbars!”  But again, we are employing the “logic” that a dollar is just the same as a billion dollars, so I guess there’s equivalence if you’re just nuts enough.

A “Christian,” just like a “Muslim,” is a particular thing.  We are talking about people who read their holy book, attend religious service and try to model their life after the example of their paradigm.  In the case of Christianity, the paradigm is Jesus; in the case of Islam, the paradigm is Muhammad.

And therein lies the problem for Muslims.  Because Christianity IS a religion of peace because Jesus is the Prince of Peace who told His followers to put away their swords and love your enemies.  Whereas Muhammad was a warmongering psychopath who told his people to pick up the sword and kill with it until all the enemies of Islam were defeated or dead.

Prior to the beginning of the “infamous” Crusades in 1095, Muslims had long-since attacked and tried to kill or forcibly convert to Islam every Christian in Northern Africa, in Egypt and in Spain.  That death spree began right away.  Muslims attacked the city of Hippo Regius made famous by St. Augustine, Bishop of Hippo.  Christians were killed or forcibly converted.  In Africa, El Cid stopped Muslims from taking Spain.  Then in 1095, the Pope, responding to the pleas of the Christian emperor of Byzantine, whose empire was under siege by Muslims, called for the Crusades.

Muslims never stopped attacking until they marginalized themselves into an inferior power.  But history is rife with examples that whenever Muslims believe they rise up in violence, they have risen up in violence.

Frankly, it is a blasphemy of HISTORY to blame Christians for the Crusades.  But we are seeing that same “blindness” and that same “not holding to the truth” emanating from Obama and the spirit of liberalism that Obama embodies today.  Academia today is FILLED with devout liars who are simply the worst kind of fools.

Is Islam the religion of peace or war?  It’s a religion of WAR.  The answer is rather bloodily obvious to anyone who would just open up a damn Koran and READ.

It took more than blindness for this devout Muslim who was preparing to murder and massacre in the name of Allah to become enraged at the concept that the religion that he was preparing to murder over might not be such a religion of peace; it took a demonic spiritual force.

And it is that SAME demonic spiritual force that owns and governs liberals, that owns and governs the Democrat Party and the Satan machine that drives the Democrat Party.

I marvel at the left: they STILL can’t bring themselves to acknowledge that the attack on the Christmas Party yesterday by a Muslim fanatic was a “terrorist attack” committed “in the name of Islam.”  But you known damn well what they would have called it if a publicly confessing Christian such as myself went on a murderous rampage of a large group celebrating Ramadan.

And that is because they have the same demonic spirit of hate for the truth and corresponding blindness to reality that Syed Farook died embodying: such a rabid denial of reality that he became enraged by someone claiming that Islam is not a religion of peace that he decided to murder that man and everyone with him.

Ultimately, it was a Christian, specifically a Messianic Jew who rightly believed his Messiah Yeshua, whose words provoked the demons in Farook’s possessed mind to enrage him into abandoning his more deadly and better planned attack for the one that he launched.  Anybody who believes that the Christian somehow caused the terrorist attack by confronting the scheming murder with his own hate is a fool.  Because he was already planning that far-more vicious attack and he and his wife clearly had the will to carry it out.

How many lives did Nicholas Thalasinos  save?  We’ll never know this side of eternity.

But Nicholas Thalasinos confronted Syed Farook with the truth.  And Farook responded to the truth the same way the mob responded to Jesus when HE presented the truth: with the spirit of hate and murder (see John 15:18-20 and compare to John 19:4-6.

That’s the spirit we see today from the heart of the left.  They mock, “God isn’t fixing this!” to anyone who would pray to the God of the Bible, to anyone who would actually stand up for the truth about “the religion of peace” the left keeps assuring us that Islam is.

Barack Obama embodies the spirit of the left.  He assured us that Islam was a religion of peace, and that by refusing to fight he would bring peace.  He is a fool and he is wrong: the exact OPPOSITE happened.  The number of terrorist attacks increased by more than 150 PERCENT during his failed watch between 2009 and 2014.  And this year terrorism has TRULY exploded under the worldview of liberalism and the failed presidency of Barack Obama, terrorism has EXPLODED BY 80 PERCENT this year from last year (2014).

There’s that Dr. Phil question: “How’s that working out for you?” to the people living wildly failed lives.

Under this failed presidency of Obama, and under the failed worldview of liberalism that nevertheless like the FOOLS they are continue to mock and undermine those who have been RIGHT and told the TRUTH all along, we now have the worse refugee crisis in ALL of human history.

The Democrat Party and Obama and Hillary Clinton are directly and personally responsible for the worst suffering in all of history.  They are literally co-conspirators with violent jihadists, in the sense that they are like Sinn Fein which served as the political wing of the terrorist Irish Republican Army.  Obama and Clinton and the Democrat Party give political cover to the MUSLIM TERRORISTS; they appease and serve as apologists and PREVENT anything substantial from being done.  Even as they mock and undermine and attack those who rightly call them out for what they are.

I remember this quote very vividly from the CIA officer who interrogated the terrorist mastermind who is responsible for the Twin Towers coming down in ruins and nearly 3,000 Americans being murdered:

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed told me personally, ‘Your country will turn on you, the liberal media will turn on you, the people will grow tired of this, they will turn on you, and when they do, you are going to be abandoned.’”

The interrogator said K.S.M. was “immensely arrogant” and “disdainful.”  Because he was no fool; he KNEW an Obama would come along and undo all the progress and help the terrorists defeat the “paper tiger” that has become America.

And that’s exactly what happened, of course.  Because the spirit of the Democrat Party is the spirit of cowardice and treason and nihilism.  And therefore Democrats treasonously side WITH the terrorists and sided WITH Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who murdered 3,000 Americans.  And therefore the next 9/11 attack is guaranteed.  And just as before, the country will ultimately traitorously turn on those who fought to save it.  Because we live in a time when the only thing Democrats are good at is treasonously undermining those who fight for the United States of America and its Constitution and its way of life enshrined by our Christian founding fathers.

And so Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party completely agrees with terrorist murderer Syed Farook, that Islam is a religion of peace.  Because Satan completely owns their souls and has completely and totally blinded them and deluded them and because they want to serve their god of this world by hating the truth and undermining it with their steadfast lies.

 

 

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 637 other followers